Skip to main content
Download PDF

Activation of intervertebral disc cells by co-culture with notochordal cells, conditioned medium and hypoxia

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 15, Article number: 422 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Notochordal cells (NC) remain in the focus of research for regenerative therapy for the degenerated intervertebral disc (IVD) due to their progenitor status. Recent findings suggested their regenerative action on more mature disc cells, presumably by the secretion of specific factors, which has been described as notochordal cell conditioned medium (NCCM). The aim of this study was to determine NC culture conditions (2D/3D, fetal calf serum, oxygen level) that lead to significant IVD cell activation in an indirect co-culture system under normoxia and hypoxia (2% oxygen).

Methods

Porcine NC was kept in 2D monolayer and in 3D alginate bead culture to identify a suitable culture system for these cells. To test stimulating effects of NC, co-cultures of NC and bovine derived coccygeal IVD cells were conducted in a 1:1 ratio with no direct cell contact between NC and bovine nucleus pulposus cell (NPC) or annulus fibrosus cells (AFC) in 3D alginate beads under normoxia and hypoxia (2%) for 7 and 14 days. As a positive control, NPC and AFC were stimulated with NC-derived conditioned medium (NCCM). Cell activity, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, DNA content and relative gene expression was measured. Mass spectrometry analysis of the NCCM was conducted.

Results

We provide evidence by flow cytometry that monolayer culture is not favorable for NC culture with respect to maintaining NC phenotype. In 3D alginate culture, NC activated NPC either in indirect co-culture or by addition of NCCM as indicated by the gene expression ratio of aggrecan/collagen type 2. This effect was strongest with 10% fetal calf serum and under hypoxia. Conversely, AFC seemed unresponsive to co-culture with pNC or to the NCCM. Further, the results showed that hypoxia led to decelerated metabolic activity, but did not lead to a significant change in the GAG/DNA ratio. Mass spectrometry identified connective tissue growth factor (CTGF, syn. CCN2) in the NCCM.

Conclusions

Our results confirm the requirement to culture NC in 3D to best maintain their phenotype, preferentially in hypoxia and with the supplementation of FCS in the culture media. Despite these advancements, the ideal culture condition remains to be identified.

Peer Review reports

Background

The notochord is a key structure in early embryogenesis in all chordates and is populated with relatively big and vacuole enriched notochordal cells (NC)[1, 2]. The cells form the center of the intervertebral disc (IVD) in the fetus and the adult[3, 4]. These cells are either present throughout the lifetime at various ratios across the vertebrate phylogenetic tree with respect to other IVD cells, or they are reduced to a minimum population after adolescence[5, 6]. In humans, it has been found that they disappear early in childhood[7]. It has been described that in different mammalian groups, these cells co-exist with nucleus pulposus cells (NPC) at different ratios[5, 7]. For instance, in cattle, goats, and sheep, these cells disappear early in lifetime[3, 7], whereas in rodents (rats and mice) and rabbits, a high number of NC is maintained throughout their lifetime. In dog breeds, both IVD types are present. In the so-called non-chondrodystrophic dogs (e.g. larger dogs, such as greyhounds) in which low back pain is less common, a high ratio of NC is present. Conversely, in chondrodystrophic dog breeds (e.g. beagle, dachshund), few NC are present, and these breeds frequently suffer from disc degeneration and low back pain. Over the past decade, the fate of NC has been a matter of debate. It was hypothesized that these cells either disappear by apoptosis or that they are differentiated into an IVD chondrocyte-like cell phenotype[8, 9]. On this matter, recent transcriptome analyses of the possible origin of these cells have pointed into the direction of precursor origin and that these two cell populations — although very different in size and granularity — were not so different in their phenotypic profile[10, 11]. The open question remains about the mesodermal or ectodermal origin of these cells[12–14]. However, recently, “noto,” a highly conserved homeobox gene restricted to the notochord, where it regulates node morphogenesis, has been tracked by a novel notochord-specific Cre mouse. These gene-tracking data, during embryogenesis, clearly demonstrated that the notochord indeed gives rise to the NP and later, to the smaller chondrocyte-like disc cells, which confirms the close relationship of the NC and the smaller NPC[15–17]. However, the interaction between these morphologically different cell types remains obscure, hence leading to cross-species co-cultures investigations[13, 14, 18] and conditioned medium experiments[13, 14, 19–23]. In a dog model, it was found that NC secrete connective tissue growth factor (CTGF, syn. CCN2) and can protect NPC from undergoing apoptosis[24, 25] by inhibiting the caspase pathway. It was furthermore demonstrated that NC are highly sensitive to the culture conditions, i.e., to media composition and oxygen content[26]. More importantly, NC or their cultured media — the so-called notochord-derived conditioned medium (NCCM) — demonstrated regenerative effects by inducing the glycosaminoglycan per DNA (GAG/DNA) ratio[13, 18, 21]. These cells, or, possibly, merely their released factors, are of high interest for regenerative medicine to re-populate degenerated IVDs or to stimulate native disc cells. Our aim was to test whether NC can activate NPC in vitro and which initial culture conditions may be favorable to activate more differentiated disc cells. The experimental set-up (explained below) is shown in Figure 1. Our first step was to revisit the question for suitable culture conditions for these cells. Previous cell culture studies expanded NC in 2D monolayer[14] and also, more recently, in 3D[26, 27]. It has been noted that NC are highly sensitive to mechanical loading and changes to the nutritional environment[26–29]. What is currently missing is a direct proof that 2D culture conditions are indeed unfavorable for NC and that the activation capacity of NC on other cells is dependent on the nutritional state of the NC in culture. Thus, we wanted to demonstrate the effect of 2D monolayer culture versus 3D cell culture in alginate. Furthermore, we investigated the hypothesis that NC are sensitive to culture conditions[28] and that their activation capacity on disc cells in indirect co-culture experiments can be stimulated by exposure to fetal calf serum (FCS). As a positive control, we included the previously described application of conditioned medium (NCCM) collected from NC that has been demonstrated to stimulate smaller NPC[21, 22, 27, 30]. However, it is unknown whether annulus fibrous cells (AFC) can be activated by either co-culture or exposure to NCCM. We then also replicated the experiments in normoxic (~21%) and hypoxic (~2%) conditions to study the effect of the physiological oxygen environment as it was also reported in the literature that NC should be preferentially cultured in hypoxia for a better aligned extracellular matrix[20, 26] and a more authentic phenotype as defined by the production of aggrecan with respect to collagen type 2, which was found to be around 27:1 in human tissue[31] or around 1:1 as found in rabbit tissue[32].

Figure 1
figure1

Experimental set-up to test NC regenerative effects on co-culture with NPC or AF that were stimulated initially in pre-culture with and without 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and subsequent co-culture or exposure with conditioned medium (NCCM) from step 1. The design also involved a comparison of normoxia (~20% oxygen) and hypoxic conditions (2% oxygen).

Full size image

Methods

Cell source and expansion

The post-mortem usage of biological material for biomedical research taken from the food chain requires no ethical permit according to the Swiss and European law. Porcine notochordal cells (NC) were isolated from the nucleus pulposus (NP) tissue of porcine tails obtained from 4- to 5-month-old pigs collected from the local abattoir. Tails with a high percentage of NC (~80%) were selected for the experiment. The percentage of NCs was assessed and counted using a haemocytometer and brightfield microscopy to confirmed the NC phenotype as large in cell size and presence of vacuoles. Bovine nucleus pulposus cells (NPC) were harvested from the NP tissue of ~1-year-old bovine tails obtained from the local slaughter house. Porcine and bovine NP tissues were digested by 0.19% pronase (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) for 1 hour and subsequent collagenase type 2 at a concentration of 32 U/mL in 25 mL of HG-DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS (Worthington, London, UK) overnight (~14 hours) at 37°C and standard culture conditions (5% CO2 and 100% humidity)[14, 23].

Cell separation using micro sieves and cytometry using FACS

Cells isolated from porcine NP tissues were separated with three cell sieves, i.e., cells > 20 μm, 8-20 μm and cells < 8 μm (CellMicroSieves, BioDesign Inc., New York, USA)[33] with the goal to identify NPC and NC. To characterize and confirm the cell populations by size, the filtered and unlabeled cell fractions were resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and were then analyzed on a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) device (LSR II H271, Bdbiosciences, inc., Allschwil, Switzerland) with 429V for forward scattering (FSC-A) and 308V for side scattering (SSC-A). Gates were analyzed and visualized using FlowJo software 10.07R2 (TreeStar, inc., Ashland, OR).Primary gates (Figure 2) for small pNPC and bigger notochordal cells (pNC) were defined based on primary cells digested from discs lacking a notochordal cell phenotype, including bovine and a whole human lumbar IVD obtained from a spinal fusion (ethical permit has been obtained from the local ethical committee). The size of these cells was compared to the cell size of NC isolated from rabbit IVD and porcine IVD. Cells were grown in 2D monolayers for three passages or in 3D alginate beads at a density of 4M/mL alginate in Dulbecco’s High Glucose Modified Eagle Medium (HG-DMEM, containing 4.5 g/mL glucose, Gibco, Lucerne, Switzerland) +10% FCS in order to test for cell size shifts during the cell expansion and to compare 2D monolayers with 3D alginate cultures.

Figure 2
figure2

Flow cytometry of unlabeled primary cells isolated from intervertebral discs (IVD) of four different species. A. Porcine passage 0 coccygeal IVD cells B. Rabbit passage 0 lumbar IVD cells. C. Bovine passage 0 coccygeal IVD cells, and D. Human passage 0 lumbar IVD cells (L1-2). Note the presence of notochordal cells, which are bigger and spread higher on both forward scatter and side scatter in A. and B. Parameters of flow cytometer were constant for all measurements. Axes are FSC-A = forward scatter, SSC-A = side scatter.

Full size image

3D cell encapsulation and co-culture

The cells were re-suspended in 1.2% alginate at a density of 4 M/mL and embedded in ~30 μl beads by pressing the suspension at a constant rate through a syringe (22G needle) and dropping them into a 102 mM CaCl2 salt solution[34]. The porcine NC:NPC ratio in the tissue was estimated to be ~80% notochordal[23]. The cells were kept in co-cultures of NC: NPC ratios of 1:1 in serum-free HG-DMEM medium containing 100 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid, ITS+ and non-essential amino acids or in HG-DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (all from Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) (Figure 1). All bead-bead co-cultures were conducted in duplicate in 12-well plates, using 0.4 μm pore size, high pore density, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) track-etched culture inserts (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Allschwil, Switzerland). The co-cultures were tracked on day 0, day 7, and day 14. Day 0 was defined as the day of cell embedding into the 3D alginate environment. There were four co-culture pairings (thus, each N = 4 for the porcine and bovine animals) (see also Figure 1). The cultures were either kept in normoxia (20% atmospheric oxygen) or in hypoxia using a C-274-2-shelf chamber inside a standard incubator and 1x Pro-Ox controller, (Biospherix, inc., NY) and keeping O2 at 2% by addition of N2.

Metabolic activity

Cell activity of the cells in alginate beads was measured using resazurin assay[35]. Two beads per condition were incubated in 500 μL DMEM with 10% FCS and 50 μM resazurin sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs Switzerland) for 3 hours in a 48-well plate[23]. The relative fluorescence unit (RFU) was then measured at an excitation wavelength of 547 nm and an emission wavelength of 582 nm using a Softmax pro multi-wave length fluorescence reader (Molecular Devices, distributed by Bucher Biotec, Switzerland). RFU values were expressed relative to the activity measured on day 0, i.e. the day of seeding the cells into alginate beads.

Quantification of GAG and DNA content

Alginate beads from the resazurin assay were digested with papain (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) overnight at 60°C. The samples digested with papain were used for glycosaminoglycan (GAG) and DNA measurement. The GAG content was measured by the modified dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay (pH 1.5)[36, 37]. The absorbance of the samples added to the DMMB buffer was read at 595 nm with a fluorescence reader (Molecular Devices). GAG concentrations were calculated from a standard curve obtained with chondroitin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland). The amount of DNA in the sample was measured with bisbenzimidol fluorescent dye (Hoechst 33258, Sigma-Aldrich). Fluorescence was again detected with a multi-wavelength fluorescence reader (Molecular Devices). A standard curve was generated with known concentrations of calf thymus DNA (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland), and the amount of DNA of each sample was calculated from the standard curve.

Real-time RT-PCR

Relative gene expression of major anabolic genes of to the extracellular matrix turnover was monitored, i.e., aggrecan (ACAN), collagen type 1 and 2 (Col 1 and Col 2, respectively) and ribosomal 18S used as a reference gene[38–40]. Typical nucleus pulposus and notochordal cell markers including brachyury (T) and CD24[41] were monitored. Due to DNA substitutions between the porcine and bovine codon sequences of one of the two primer regions, species-specific RT-PCR were designed (Table 1) for both NCs and NPCs. Relative gene expression was estimated by application of a threshold cycle (Ct) and calculation of ∆∆Ct and the statistics of the 2-∆∆Ct according to Livak & Schmittgen[42].

Table 1 Primer sequences used for relative real-time RT-PCR
Full size table

Mass spectrometry analysis and protein identification of conditioned medium

Proteins of 1) serum-free control medium versus 2) NCCM and 3) medium collected from NPC and NC co-culture were lysed in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and proteins separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels. Gels were stained with Sypro Ruby® protein gel stain (Sigma), and the separated proteins were isolated from the gel according to Heller et al.[43]. Briefly, peptide sequencing was made on a LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a Rheos Allegro nano flow system with AFM flow splitting (Flux Instruments, Reinach, Switzerland) and a nano electrospray ion source operated at a voltage of 1.7 kV. Peptide separation was performed on a Magic C18 column (5 μm, 100 Å, 0.075 × 70 mm) using a flow rate of ~400 nL/min and a linear gradient of 5 to 40% acetonitrile in water/0.1% (v/v) formic acid over 60 min. Data acquisition was also done according to Heller et al.[43]. Using the Hardklör Database, mascot generic files were generated[44]. Applying a two round strategy, the searches were done with Phenyx[45] against the forward and reversed UniprotKB SwissProt protein database (Release 2013_12) of human entries. The parameters for the peptide search on the SwissProt protein database were also conducted according to Al Kaabi et al.[46]. The peptide match score summation (PMSS) value for each identified protein was used as a semi-quantitative abundance estimate. PMSS values were normalized by division with the median PMSS across all proteins in each sample and multiplication with the median across all samples. We use the SwissProt ID as the protein name in this manuscript.

Histology

The alginate beads were initially fixed in Tissue-Tek® O.C.T.™ compound (Sakura Finetek Europe, Leiden, The Netherlands) for 20 min and then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Beads were then sectioned in 12 μm slices with a cryotome (Microm HM560, Thermoscientific, Reinach, Switzerland). For immune-staining, slices were incubated in solutions containing 0.1M CaCl2 to prevent dissolution of beads. The cells were first permeabilized with 100% methanol for 2 min and then blocked with 10% FBS 0.1M CaCl2 for 1 hour. The beads were then incubated with polyclonal rabbit brachyury (H-210) polyclonal primary antibody for 1h at a 1:200 dilution (sc-20109, Santa Cruz biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). After washing, the primary antibody was visualized with the secondary antibody Alexa Fluor® 488 Goat anti-Rabbit IgG antibody (A1108, Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Basel, Switzerland) at a 1:500 dilution. Sections were mounted in ProLong® Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI (P-36931, Molecular Probes) to stain the nuclei and were visualized on an inverted fluorescent microscope (Nikon Eclipse E800, Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analyses

All data are given as relative to the “pure” cell population of the same culture day. “Pure” is defined as primary isolated cells cultured in 3D and no contact with other cells, i.e., the cells cultured in media lacking FCS and kept in normoxia. Statistical significance was tested using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis exact test and multiple comparison tests using GraphPad Prism version 5.0f, GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA, http://www.graphpad.com.

Results

Analysis of 2D and 3D cell populations

Cytometry was able to distinguish the cell size differences of the different cell types with the forward (F-SC) and side scatter (S-SC) (Figure 2). Initially putting cell isolations of different species unlabeled under the flow cytometer revealed the clear size differences of this primary isolated cell population after pronase/collagenase 2 digestion, with cell populations containing NC being much larger in F-SC and S-SC. This allowed the definition of the major gate for NC based on cell populations from the mixed IVD cell type. The gate for NPC was based on cells isolated from IVDs lacking the NC fraction, such as bovine and human IVD (Figure 2C, and D). Small NPC (< 8 μm cell size), a mixed cell population (8-20 μm), and a cell population with mainly large cells (>20 μm) were separated. Of the cells > 20 μm, almost all cells had a notochordal cell phenotype at the beginning of the culture. However, after 1-3 passages in 2D, the originally distinct cell populations turned into populations that were not distinguishable from each other (Figure 3A). In contrast, much more NC could be recovered after 34 days of 3D alginate bead culture (around 50%, see Figure 3B). Thus, 3D alginate culture seemed to be superior for NC culture as a higher fraction of large NC were revealed after 34 days of culture, compared to the identical cell population cultured in 2D monolayer and with the requirement to passage them three times for the same number of culture days (Figure 3).

Figure 3
figure3

Flow cytometry of cell-sieve sorted unlabeled primary cells isolated from porcine coccygeal intervertebral discs (IVD). A. (first raw) flow cytometry of passage 0 IVD cells separated by size with cell sieves of different mesh size and (second raw) change of cell size and composition if IVD cells were kept in monolayer culture for three passages (after three weeks). B. Flow cytometry of unlabeled primary cells comparing the performance of 2D monolayer (lower left) versus 3D alginate culture (lower right). Parameters of flow cytometer were constant for all measurements. Axes are FSC-A = forward scatter, SSC-A = side scatter.

Full size image

Cell metabolism, proliferation, and GAG synthesis of 3D co-culture experiments

After 7 days, cell activity, as quantified by resazurin assay, revealed a non-significant change among NC in normoxia (NO) among the four experimental groups (K-W, p = 0.117) but was significant among the experimental groups in hypoxia (HY) after 7 days (K-W, p = 0.0163, Figure 4A). After 14 days, activity was not different among NC groups, neither under NO nor HY (for NO K-W, p = 0.322, for HY K-W, p = 0.051) (Figure 4A and B). Pre-culture of NC prior co-culture revealed in general higher activity in the NC than in the controls after 7 days of co-culture. However, these effects flattened out after 14 days. NPC cell activity remained unchanged under NO after 7 days. There were no significant differences in cell activity among the NPC and the AFC experimental groups, whether they were cultured in NO or HY (Figure 4E and F). The GAG/DNA ratio among the NC groups was significantly different after 7 days in both NO (K-W, p = 0.023, Figure 5A) and HY conditions (K-W, p = 0.016 for HY, Figure 5A), and the ratio remained significantly different after 14 days in HY (K-W, p = 0.044, Figure 5B). In NO conditions, the GAG/DNA ratio of pure NPC was decreased on day 14 to 89.9 ± 38.3% (mean ± SEM) (Figure 5D). When these NPC were co-cultured with NC 1:1, which were never exposed to FCS, the GAG/DNA ratio dropped after 7 days (i.e. 77.1 ± 18.68%, Figure 5C). However, in NO, if we added NCCM or co-cultured NPC with NC, which were exposed to 10% FCS during pre-culture, the ratio tended to be increased (190.6 ± 112.8%) or by addition of NCCM (140.1 ± 71.5%, Figure 5D) after 14 days. However, this was statistically non-significant among NPC groups (K-W, p = 0.964). In HY, however, the ratio tended to be elevated to 152.1 ± 50.2% for the CoC and to 195.7% ± 112.5% for the NCCM group (Figure 5D). After 14 days of culture, these trends were maintained, but these were not significant.

Figure 4
figure4

Cell activity of primary cells in 3D alginate bead co-culture. A, B. Porcine notochordal cells (NC) C, D. Bovine nucleus pulposus cells (NPC) and E, F. Bovine annulus fibrosus cells (AFC). The activity was measured by resazurin assay after day 7 (A, C, E, left side) and 14 days (B, D, F, right side) in normoxic (in blue) and hypoxic (in brown) conditions (mean ± SEM, N = 4 co-culture repeats). *Indicates p < 0.05.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure5

GAG/DNA ratio of primary cells in 3D alginate bead co-culture. A, B. Porcine notochordal cells (NC) C, D. Bovine nucleus pulposus cells (NPC) and E, F. Bovine annulus fibrosus cells (AFC). The ratio was measured after day 7 (A, C, E, left side) and 14 days (B, D, F, right side) of culture in normoxic (in blue) and hypoxic (in brown) conditions (mean ± SEM, N = 4 co-culture repeats). *Indicates p < 0.05.

Full size image

Relative gene expression of NC

ACAN expression of NC was found up-regulated around ten times in the co-culture groups with NPC and previous exposure to FCS, compared to the pure cell population without previous contact with FCS, both in NO and HY (Figure 6A). Further, we found that ACAN gene expression were more pronounced in the co-cultures supplied with 10% FCS and were more strongly expressed in the NO cultures (Figure 6). Collagen type 2 expression was up-regulated much stronger in all groups cultured in NO but much less in HY. The gene expression of one of the major genes for the characterization of the notochordal cells – brachyury (T) — showed a weak up-regulation after 14 days of culture in the HY group, but not in the NO group (Figure 6C).

Figure 6
figure6

Relative gene expression of porcine NC in co-culture with bovine NPC in 3D alginate microspheres after 14 days of culture in normoxic (in blue) and hypoxic conditions (in brown). A. Aggrecan (ACAN) expression, B. Collagen type 2 (col2) expression, C. Brachyury (T) expression, D. CD24 expression *indicates p < 0.05. Gene expression is given relative to the pure NC without FCS and in normoxia (NO) at 14 days. CoC = co-culture with NPC, FCS = 7 days pre-culture in medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (mean ± SEM, N = 4 co-culture repeats).

Full size image

Relative gene expression of NPC

RT-PCR data suggested that CD24 expression in bovine NPC (Figure 7), the NP-specific surface marker, was expressed differently in NO and HY conditions. While there was only a weak effect between the experimental groups of co-culture, however, the effect of the oxygen level was significant (K-W, p = 0.034). However, according to the ACAN/col2 ratio criterion, the most “IVD-like” gene expression pattern among all investigated NPC groups was identified in HY and by co-culture with NC that were previously activated with FCS or by addition of NCCM (Figure 8).

Figure 7
figure7

Relative gene expression of bovine NPC in co-culture of bovine NC in 3D alginate microspheres after 14 days of culture in normoxic (in blue) and hypoxic (in brown) conditions. A. Aggrecan (ACAN) expression, B. Collagen type 2 (col2) expression, C. CD24 expression. *Indicates p < 0.05. Gene expression is given relative to the pure NPC without FCS and in normoxia (NO) at 14 days, CoC = co-culture with NC, FCS = 7 days pre-culture in medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (mean ± SEM, N = 4 co-culture repeats).

Full size image
Figure 8
figure8

ACAN/col2 ratio of relative gene expression of bovine nucleus pulposus cells (NPC) cultured for 14 days either in normoxia (NO = 20% oxygen) or hypoxia (HY = 2% oxygen). NCCM = porcine notochordal cells conditioned medium, CoC = co-culture with NC, FCS = 7 days pre-culture in medium containing 10% fetal calf serum.

Full size image

Histology

The immune histology of NC in beads for brachyury (T) revealed a slightly stronger expression in the case of NO culture conditions compared to HY but the strongest effect was seen if NC were kept “boosted” in media containing 10% FCS for 7 days previous to co-culture (Figure 9).

Figure 9
figure9

Immunological staining of brachyury (“T”, green) expression on porcine NC in alginate bead cryosections (12 μm) and DAPI stain for nuclei after 14 days of culture in presence or absence of initial pre-culture with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and cultured either in normoxia (~20% oxygen) or hypoxia (2% oxygen). Inlet in the upper left represents day 4 porcine NC cultured on cover slips in monolayer and stained for T. Inlet in the lower right represents a negative control lacking the primary antibody.

Full size image

Mass spectrometry of NCCM

For the analysis of the medium protein profile (Table 2, Additional file1: Table S1), we screened for strong signal differences between the unconditioned and the conditioned medium (pooled after 7 days of serum-free culture). A full table of the Swiss Prot search of identified proteins can be obtained as an additional supplemental, Additional file1: Table S1. We found that the CTGF increased in the conditioned medium, which has been identified in canine notochordal cells by Erwin et al.[24]. Further, we found a high concentration of the serum amyloid A-2 protein (SAA2_MUSVI), an outbreak protein identified in immune burst reactions (Table 2 and Additional file1: Table S1).

Table 2 Summary of mass spectrometric analysis of the most interesting proteins related to the IVD extracellular matrix homeostasis identified in serum free medium (SFM) on day 0, conditioned medium (NCCM) of pure NC collected after 7 days and co-culture (CoC) medium of 1:1 NC: NPC co-culture (CoC) after 7 days CoC
Full size table

Discussion

Phenotype of NC

The NC phenotype is specific in the sense that cells are relatively large in size[47] and highly dependent on nutrition because of a high cellular activity[23, 28]. Here, we present data that clearly demonstrate that in monolayer cell culture, NC seem to be outcompeted by the small chondrocyte-like NPC (Figure 3). Of course, we cannot conclude from our unlabeled FACS cytometric data whether the NC differentiated into NPC or whether NPC simply grew faster than NC. However, a recent time-lapse microscopy study by Kim et al.[48] showed that NC populations harvested from the spine of mature New Zealand white rabbits proliferate much slower than the smaller chondrocyte-like cells (i.e. defined as NPC in our case). These authors, furthermore, demonstrated, using time-lapse cell-tracking microscopy, that by looking closer into the NC fraction, there are different cell types present, i.e., vacuolated, giant and polygonal cells that differ in cell proliferation and speed of cell motility. These authors suggested that NC differentiated in vitro into these three morphologically different cell types. The negative effects of monolayer culture for the maintenance for NC has also been demonstrated by Rastogi et al.[26], who cultured rat NC in monolayer in NO and HY. They found that 3D alginate culture maintained the NC phenotype better compared to 2D monolayer. The rapid loss of NC over time can be partially prevented by 3D alginate culture for up to 34 days, as was revealed in this study (Figure 3). Considering our data and the published work, it is still unclear which scenario might be true. We further confirm a strong nutrient dependency (by addition or lack of FCS), as has been found previously[28]. We can clearly confirm a strong dependency of NC to culture medium composition and also oxygen content, as revealed by cell activity and GAG/DNA ratio data (Figures 4 and5). We found a trend towards increased GAG/DNA ratio if NC were kept in medium containing 10% FCS (Figure 5). It has been demonstrated that NC and NPC differ in cell size, nutrition[28], surface markers[49], and mechanosensitivity[29]. It was found that NC glucose consumption rate is higher than in NPC under identical culture conditions[28]. Furthermore, the clear size differences were confirmed by non-invasive femtosecond laser microscopy[47]. Furthermore, the NC differ by the presence of large vacuoles, which can be separated by the size-scatter of FACS analysis[3, 6], as has also been shown by our study. These large vacuoles found in NC of the intervertebral disc have been attributed to a possible functional role in osmoregulation[50]. It has been noted that these vacuoles are not present anymore in the NC after long-time in-vitro culture of 28 days using porcine NC[27, 51]. No such complete loss of vacuoles but a reduction in numbers were reported by other in vitro studies using rat or rabbit NC[26, 48]. Transcriptomics that compare the NC and the NPC cell population revealed that there are only about 20 genes really distinct between these two cell types[10, 52]. A number of cell surface markers that separate these two cell populations have been identified[49]. Weiler et al.[53] found that cells in the human fetal and juvenile NP with the typical morphology of the notochord (physaliferous) express the markers cytokeratin CK-8, -18, -19, and Galectin-3[54]. Another NC-typical marker is brachyury (T), which was investigated in this study. We found that the notochordal homeobox gene marker T did not change when altering the culture conditions but decreased about 10-fold under normoxia at the RNA level (Figure 6). Immunohistology staining confirmed this finding and showed a slight increase of T expression in the case of hypoxia (Figure 9). Potier et al.[27] found a general loss of the NC phenotype and loss of the markers cytokeratin 8 and 19 (KRT8, 19) in their co-culture system of NC, NPC, and mesenchymal stem cells over 28 days of culture. Gilson et al.[49] found that pig NPC, which are phenotypically similar to human infant NPC, were all KRT8 positive. This has been recently confirmed by another histological study on human tissue; the authors furthermore demonstrated that KRT8 is down-regulated with onset of IVD degeneration[55]. However, as we did not look into KRT8 expression in this study, we cannot comment on the validity of the KRT8 marker. Interestingly, a strong effect between hypoxic and normoxic condition was found in the surface marker CD24 in the NPC (K-W test, p = 0.034) (Figure 7), such that CD24 was higher expressed under HY. This finding is in agreement with the culture study presented by Rastogi et al.[26] where they kept NC in alginate beads and in hypoxia and normoxia. Thus, CD24 might indeed represent a sensitive marker for the NC phenotype. CD24, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor protein, has been proposed as a NP-specific marker[26, 41]. Finally, a Tie2+ cell population has been recently reported about, which reflects a stem cell population in the IVD, which decreases rapidly with age[56]. These cells, as well as induced progenitor (iPS) cells, seem to express CD24 and can be enriched via this surface marker[16, 56]. iPS cells, which hold potential for the regeneration of the IVD, could at least theoretically be produced from both NC and NPC. However, it is still unclear which cell type would be more potent and suitable.

Optimizing NC culture conditions

NC are perfectly adapted to a low oxygen environment. They can produce a better-aligned ECM under hypoxic conditions[20]. Here, we cultured the cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. We found that the GAG/DNA ratio of the NC could be significantly increased indeed under HY rather than NO after 14 days (Figure 5B). However, in terms of the better maintenance of a notochord phenotype, the expression of T was higher under HY than in NO from both gene expression and immune-staining data. It could also be that keeping the NC in clusters rather than completely isolated by digestion and increasing the osmolarity from 230 mOsm/L to 400 mOsm/L could preserve the porcine NC phenotype better in culture[51]. Interestingly, we found that by applying indirect co-culture or applying the CM to the bovine NPC, we could obtain a ACAN/col 2 ratio, which was most favorable for the IVD phenotype, in the order of a 1:1 ratio as found in rabbit cells[32] (Figure 8). Similar findings were obtained by previous studies culturing NC or NPC under hypoxia[16, 20, 31, 57]. We cultured the NC in high glucose DMEM (i.e. with 25 mM glucose) either in serum-free medium or medium supplemented with 10% FCS. Park and Park[58] found that the cell proliferation of NC was significantly decreased at glucose concentrations of 100 mM, 200 mM, and 400 mM and apoptosis was increased via the intrinsic pathway with dose- and time-dependent effects. Guehring et al.[28] tested the nutrient sensitivity of NC depleting glucose from 5 mM to 0 mM and found a strong nutrient sensitivity of these cells. Future experiments could be to test culture conditions on NC viability in the 5-20 mM range and adjusting osmolarity.

Composition of NCCM

The analysis of the NCCM by mass spectrometry revealed the presence of expected anabolic proteins, such as the collagens 1, 5, and 6, which these cells produce in 2D and surely in 3D culture (Table 2). Notably, collagen type 2 was not hit by the SwissProt blast. There were also two MMPs detected (MMP1 and MMP2) detected, which is not unexpected given the nature of the NC and NPC. However, unexpectedly, neither MMP3 nor MMP13 were hit by the SwissProt search in the NCCM. These missed proteins might be due to the limited approach to analyzing the NCCM and CoC-medium presented here. Future experimental work could specifically isolate the vacuoles of the NC through centrifugation methods and then perform mass spectrometry analysis on these fractions, which might reveal more focused spectrum searches. Another interesting candidate found by the SwissProt search was High-Temperature Requirement A Serine Peptidase (HTRA1) that was present in the case of the 7 days CoC of NC with NPC (Table 2, Additional file1: Table S1). This enzyme has been described as a potential key enzyme in intervertebral disc degeneration[59, 60] and was specifically expressed here by NPC and not by NC.

Conclusions

  • NC were sensitive to the addition of FCS to the culture medium after 7 days of co-culture but these effects were not longer evident after 14 days. The cell activity was highly reduced in hypoxia compared to normoxia (Figure 4A and B).

  • NC produced significantly more GAG/DNA after stimulation with 10% FCS in NO and HY after 7 days culture and in HY after 14 days culture (Figure 5A and B).

  • NPC tended to produce more GAG/DNA in presence of NC that have been activated previously with FCS or by addition of NCCM (Figure 5C and D).

  • AFC, however, did not respond at all to the presence of NC nor NCCM (Figure 5E and F).

  • Hypoxia and indirect co-culture of FCS-stimulated NC or addition of NCCM resulted in a NPC phenotype, which was most IVD-like according to the ACAN/col2 ratio (Figure 8).

  • Connective Tissue Growth factor (CTGF, syn. CCN2) has been confirmed to be present in the conditioned medium of porcine NC and in NC: NPC co-cultures (Table 2).

Abbreviations

AFC:

Annulus fibrosus cells

COC:

Co-culture

FCS:

Fetal calf serum

KRT:

Keratin

MMP:

Metalloproteinase

NO:

Normoxia

NCCM:

Notochordal cell-derived conditioned medium

NPC:

Nucleus pulposus cells

HY:

Hypoxia

pNC:

Porcine notochordal cells.

References

  1. 1.

    Walmsley R: The development and growth of the intervertebral disc. Edinb Med J. 1953, 60 (8): 341-364.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Horwitz T: The Human Notochord: A Study of its Development and Regression, Variations, and Pathologic Derivative, Chordoma. 1977, Indianapolis: Horwitz

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hunter CJ, Matyas JR, Duncan NA: Cytomorphology of notochordal and chondrocytic cells from the nucleus pulposus: a species comparison. J Anat. 2004, 205 (5): 357-362. 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00352.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Doskocil M, Valouch P, Pazderka V: On vertebral body growth. Funct Dev Morphol. 1993, 3 (3): 149-155.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Miyazaki T, Kobayashi S, Takeno K, Meir A, Urban J, Baba H: A phenotypic comparison of proteoglycan production of intervertebral disc cells isolated from rats, rabbits, and bovine tails; which animal model is most suitable to study tissue engineering and biological repair of human disc disorders?. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009, 15 (12): 3835-3846. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0250.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen J, Yan W, Setton LA: Molecular phenotypes of notochordal cells purified from immature nucleus pulposus. Eur Spine J. 2006, 15 (Suppl 3): S303-S311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hunter CJ, Matyas JR, Duncan NA: The notochordal cell in the nucleus pulposus: a review in the context of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2003, 9 (4): 667-677. 10.1089/107632703768247368.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shapiro IM, Risbud MV: Transcriptional profiling of the nucleus pulposus: say yes to notochord. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010, 12 (3): 117-10.1186/ar3003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Risbud MV, Shapiro IM: Notochordal cells in the adult intervertebral disc: new perspective on an old question. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2011, 21 (1): 29-41. 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v21.i1.30.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Minogue BM, Richardson SM, Zeef LA, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA: Transcriptional profiling of bovine intervertebral disc cells: implications for identification of normal and degenerate human intervertebral disc cell phenotypes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010, 12 (1): R22-10.1186/ar2929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sakai D, Nakai T, Mochida J, Alini M, Grad S: Differential phenotype of intervertebral disc cells: microarray and immunohistochemical analysis of canine nucleus pulposus and anulus fibrosus. Spine. 2009, 34 (14): 1448-1456. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a55705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Erwin WM: The enigma that is the nucleus pulposus cell: the search goes on. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010, 12 (3): 118-10.1186/ar3001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Aguiar DJ, Johnson SL, Oegema TR: Notochordal cells interact with nucleus pulposus cells: regulation of proteoglycan synthesis. Exp Cell Res. 1999, 246 (1): 129-137. 10.1006/excr.1998.4287.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Boyd LM, Chen J, Kraus VB, Setton LA: Conditioned medium differentially regulates matrix protein gene expression in cells of the intervertebral disc. Spine. 2004, 29 (20): 2217-2222. 10.1097/01.brs.0000142747.90488.1d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    McCann MR, Tamplin OJ, Rossant J, Séguin CA: Tracing notochord-derived cells using a Noto-cre mouse: implications for intervertebral disc development. Dis Model Mech. 2012, 5 (1): 73-82. 10.1242/dmm.008128.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen J, Lee EJ, Jing L, Christoforou N, Leong KW, Setton LA: Differentiation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into nucleus pulposus-like cells in vitro. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (9): e75548-10.1371/journal.pone.0075548.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Choi JJ, Alkharouf NW, Schneider KT, Matthews BF, Frederick RD: Expression patterns in soybean resistant to Phakopsora pachyrhizi reveal the importance of peroxidases and lipoxygenases. Funct Integr Genomics. 2008, 8 (4): 341-359. 10.1007/s10142-008-0080-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Korecki CL, Taboas JM, Tuan RS, Iatridis JC: Notochordal cell conditioned medium stimulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward a young nucleus pulposus phenotype. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010, 1 (2): 18-10.1186/scrt18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Erwin WM, Inman RD: Notochord cells regulate intervertebral disc chondrocyte proteoglycan production and cell proliferation. Spine. 2006, 31 (10): 1094-1099. 10.1097/01.brs.0000216593.97157.dd.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Erwin WM, Las Heras F, Islam D, Fehlings MG, Inman RD: The regenerative capacity of the notochordal cell: tissue constructs generated in vitro under hypoxic conditions. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009, 10 (6): 513-521. 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Purmessur D, Schek RM, Abbott RD, Ballif BA, Godburn KE, Iatridis JC: Notochordal conditioned media from tissue increases proteoglycan accumulation and promotes a healthy nucleus pulposus phenotype in human mesenchymal stem cells. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011, 13 (3): R81-10.1186/ar3344.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Abbott RD, Purmessur D, Monsey RD, Iatridis JC: Regenerative potential of TGFβ3 + Dex and notochordal cell conditioned media on degenerated human intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res. 2012, 30 (3): 482-488. 10.1002/jor.21534.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gantenbein-Ritter B, Chan SC: The evolutionary importance of cell ratio between notochordal and nucleus pulposus cells: an experimental 3-D co-culture study. Eur Spine J. 2011, 21 (Suppl 6): 819-825.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Erwin WM, Ashman K, O’Donnel P, Inman RD: Nucleus pulposus notochord cells secrete connective tissue growth factor and up-regulate proteoglycan expression by intervertebral disc chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54 (12): 3859-3867. 10.1002/art.22258.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Erwin WM, Islam D, Inman RD, Fehlings MG, Tsui FW: Notochordal cells protect nucleus pulposus cells from degradation and apoptosis: implications for the mechanisms of intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011, 13 (6): R215-10.1186/ar3548.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rastogi A, Thakore P, Leung A, Benavides M, Machado M, Morschauser MA, Hsieh AH: Environmental regulation of notochordal gene expression in nucleus pulposus cells. J Cell Physiol. 2009, 220 (3): 698-705. 10.1002/jcp.21816.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Potier E, Ito K: Using notochordal cells of developmental origin to stimulate nucleus pulposus cells and bone marrow stromal cells for intervertebral disc regeneration. Eur Spine J. 2013, 23 (3): 679-688. epub ahead of print

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Guehring T, Wilde G, Sumner M, Grünhagen T, Karney GB, Tirlapur UK, Urban JP: Notochordal intervertebral disc cells: sensitivity to nutrient deprivation. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60 (4): 1026-1034. 10.1002/art.24407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Guehring T, Nerlich A, Kroeber M, Richter W, Omlor GW: Sensitivity of notochordal disc cells to mechanical loading: an experimental animal study. Eur Spine J. 2010, 19 (1): 113-121. 10.1007/s00586-009-1217-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Purmessur D, Cornejo MC, Cho SK, Hecht AC, Iatridis JC: Notochordal cell-derived therapeutic strategies for discogenic back pain. Global Spine J. 2013, 3 (3): 201-218. 10.1055/s-0033-1350053.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mwale F, Roughley P, Antoniou J: Distinction between the extracellular matrix of the nucleus pulposus and hyaline cartilage: a requisite for tissue engineering of intervertebral disc. Eur Cell Mater. 2004, 8: 58-63. discussion 63-4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Clouet J, Grimandi G, Pot-Vaucel M, Masson M, Fellah HB, Guigand L, Cherel Y, Bord E, Rannou F, Weiss P, Guicheux J, Vinatier C: Identification of phenotypic discriminating markers for intervertebral disc cells and articular chondrocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009, 48 (11): 1447-1450. 10.1093/rheumatology/kep262.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cappello R, Bird JL, Pfeiffer D, Bayliss MT, Dudhia J: Notochordal cell produce and assemble extracellular matrix in a distinct manner, which may be responsible for the maintenance of healthy nucleus pulposus. Spine. 2006, 31 (8): 873-882. 10.1097/01.brs.0000209302.00820.fd. discussion 883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Maldonado BA, Oegema TR: Initial characterization of the metabolism of intervertebral disc cells encapsulated in microspheres. J Orthop Res. 1992, 10 (5): 677-690. 10.1002/jor.1100100510.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ahmed SA, Gogal RM, Walsh JE: A new rapid and simple non-radioactive assay to monitor and determine the proliferation of lymphocytes: an alternative to [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. J Immunol Methods. 1994, 170 (2): 211-224. 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90396-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Enobakhare BO, Bader DL, Lee DA: Quantification of sulfated glycosaminoglycans in chondrocyte/alginate cultures, by use of 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue. Anal Biochem. 1996, 243 (1): 189-191. 10.1006/abio.1996.0502.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Farndale RW, Buttle DJ, Barrett AJ: Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986, 883 (2): 173-177. 10.1016/0304-4165(86)90306-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lee CR, Grad S, Maclean JJ, Iatridis JC, Alini M: Effect of mechanical loading on mRNA levels of common endogenous controls in articular chondrocytes and intervertebral disk. Anal Biochem. 2005, 341 (2): 372-375. 10.1016/j.ab.2004.10.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Marino JH, Cook P, Miller KS: Accurate and statistically verified quantification of relative mRNA abundances using SYBR Green I and real-time RT-PCR. J Immunol Methods. 2003, 283 (1–2): 291-306.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schmittgen TD, Zakrajsek BA: Effect of experimental treatment on housekeeping gene expression: validation by real-time, quantitative RT-PCR. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2000, 46 (1–2): 69-81.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fujita N, Miyamoto T, Imai J, Hosogane N, Suzuki T, Yagi M, Morita K, Ninomiya K, Miyamoto K, Takaishi H, Matsumoto M, Morioka H, Yabe H, Chiba K, Watanabe S, Toyama Y, Suda T: CD24 is expressed specifically in the nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 338 (4): 1890-1896. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.166.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25 (4): 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Heller M, Schlappritzi E, Stalder D, Nuoffer JM, Haeberli A: Compositional protein analysis of high density lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia by shotgun LC-MS/MS and probabilistic peptide scoring. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007, 6 (6): 1059-1072. 10.1074/mcp.M600326-MCP200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hoopmann MR, Finney GL, MacCoss MJ: High-speed data reduction, feature detection, and MS/MS spectrum quality assessment of shotgun proteomics data sets using high-resolution mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2007, 79 (15): 5620-5632. 10.1021/ac0700833.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bézier A, Annaheim M, Herbinière J, Wetterwald C, Gyapay G, Bernard-Samain S, Wincker P, Roditi I, Heller M, Belghazi M, Pfister-Wilhem R, Periquet G, Dupuy C, Huguet E, Volkoff AN, Lanzrein B, Drezen JM: Polydnaviruses of braconid wasps derive from an ancestral nudivirus. Science. 2009, 323 (5916): 926-930. 10.1126/science.1166788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Al Kaabi A, Traupe T, Stutz M, Buchs N, Heller M: Cause or effect of arteriogenesis: compositional alterations of microparticles from CAD patients undergoing external counterpulsation therapy. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (10): e46822-10.1371/journal.pone.0046822.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Guehring T, Urban JP, Cui Z, Tirlapur UK: Noninvasive 3D vital imaging and characterization of notochordal cells of the intervertebral disc by femtosecond near-infrared two-photon laser scanning microscopy and spatial-volume rendering. Microsc Res Tech. 2008, 71 (4): 298-304. 10.1002/jemt.20557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kim JH, Deasy BM, Seo HY, Studer RK, Vo NV, Georgescu HI, Sowa GA, Kang JD: Differentiation of intervertebral notochordal cells through live automated cell imaging system in vitro. Spine. 2009, 34 (23): 2486-2493. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b26ed1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gilson A, Dreger M, Urban JP: Differential expression levels of cytokeratin 8 in cells of the bovine nucleus pulposus complicates the search for specific intervertebral disc cell markers. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010, 12 (1): R24-10.1186/ar2931.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hunter CJ, Bianchi S, Cheng P, Muldrew K: Osmoregulatory function of large vacuoles found in notochordal cells of the intervertebral disc running title: an osmoregulatory vacuole. Mol Cell Biomech. 2007, 4 (4): 227-237.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Spillekom S, Smolders LA, Grinwis GC, Arkesteijn IT, Ito K, Meij BP, Tryfonidou MA: Increased osmolarity and cell clustering preserve canine notochordal cell phenotype in culture. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2014, 20 (8): 652-662. 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0479.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Risbud MV, Schaer TP, Shapiro IM: Toward an understanding of the role of notochordal cells in the adult intervertebral disc: From discord to accord. Dev Dyn. 2010, 239: 2141-2148. 10.1002/dvdy.22350.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Weiler C, Nerlich AG, Schaaf R, Bachmeier BE, Wuertz K, Boos N: Immunohistochemical identification of notochordal markers in cells in the aging human lumbar intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J. 2010, 19 (10): 1761-1770. 10.1007/s00586-010-1392-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Oguz E, Tsai TT, Di Martino A, Guttapalli A, Albert TJ, Shapiro IM, Risbud MV: Galectin-3 expression in the intervertebral disc: a useful marker of the notochord phenotype?. Spine. 2007, 32 (1): 9-16. 10.1097/01.brs.0000250302.74574.98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sun Z, Wang HQ, Liu ZH, Chang L, Chen YF, Zhang YZ, Zhang WL, Gao Y, Wan ZY, Che L, Liu X, Samartzis D, Luo ZJ: Down-Regulated CK8 expression in human intervertebral disc degeneration. Int J Med Sci. 2013, 10 (8): 948-956. 10.7150/ijms.5642.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sakai D, Nakamura Y, Nakai T, Mishima T, Kato S, Grad S, Alini M, Risbud MV, Chan D, Cheah KS, Yamamura K, Masuda K, Okano H, Ando K, Mochida J: Exhaustion of nucleus pulposus progenitor cells with ageing and degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Nat Commun. 2012, 3: 1264-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Mwale F, Ciobanu I, Giannitsios D, Roughley P, Steffen T, Antoniou J: Effect of oxygen levels on proteoglycan synthesis by intervertebral disc cells. Spine. 2011, 36 (2): E131-E138. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d52b9e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Park EY, Park JB: Dose- and time-dependent effect of high glucose concentration on viability of notochordal cells and expression of matrix degrading and fibrotic enzymes. Int Orthop. 2013, 37 (6): 1179-1186. 10.1007/s00264-013-1836-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Grau S, Richards PJ, Kerr B, Hughes C, Caterson B, Williams AS, Junker U, Jones SA, Clausen T, Ehrmann M: The role of human HtrA1 in arthritic disease. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (10): 6124-6129. 10.1074/jbc.M500361200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Tiaden AN, Klawitter M, Lux V, Mirsaidi A, Bahrenberg G, Glanz S, Quero L, Liebscher T, Wuertz K, Ehrmann M, Richards PJ: A detrimental role for human high temperature requirement serine protease A1 (HTRA1) in the pathogenesis of intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287 (25): 21335-21345. 10.1074/jbc.M112.341032.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/422/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a Swiss National Science Project # 310030_153411 and a grant by the Mäxi Foundation, Center of Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine (CABMM) Start-up Grant, University of Zürich. The imaging part of this study was performed with the facility of the Microscopy Imaging Center (MIC), University of Bern and the mass spectrometry was done in the Proteomics & Mass Spectrometry Core Facility at the Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Tissue & Organ Mechanobiology, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Benjamin Gantenbein, Elena Calandriello & Samantha CW Chan

  2. Competence Center for Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Benjamin Gantenbein & Karin Wuertz-Kozak

  3. AOSpine Research Network, Duebendorf, Zurich, Switzerland

    Benjamin Gantenbein, Karin Wuertz-Kozak & Lorin M Benneker

  4. Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Karin Wuertz-Kozak

  5. Department for Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Lorin M Benneker & Marius JB Keel

  6. Bioactive materials, EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St Gallen, Switzerland

    Samantha CW Chan

Authors
  1. Benjamin Gantenbein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elena Calandriello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karin Wuertz-Kozak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lorin M Benneker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marius JB Keel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Samantha CW Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Gantenbein.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

BG: data collection, preparation of manuscript, experimental design and interpretation, funding; EC: data collection; KWK preparation of manuscript, data interpretation; LMB and MJBK: experimental design, guidance and funding; SCW: data interpretation; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gantenbein, B., Calandriello, E., Wuertz-Kozak, K. et al. Activation of intervertebral disc cells by co-culture with notochordal cells, conditioned medium and hypoxia. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15, 422 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-422

Download citation

Keywords

  • Co-culture
  • Conditioned-medium
  • Notochord
  • Nucleus pulposus
  • Proteoglycan/DNA content
  • Relative gene expression
  • Mass spectrometry

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us