Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Low dose native type II collagen prevents pain in a rat osteoarthritis model

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201314:228

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-228

  • Received: 4 April 2013
  • Accepted: 31 July 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Osteoarthritis is the most widespread joint-affecting disease. Patients with osteoarthritis experience pain and impaired mobility resulting in marked reduction of quality of life. A progressive cartilage loss is responsible of an evolving disease difficult to treat. The characteristic of chronicity determines the need of new active disease modifying drugs. Aim of the present research is to evaluate the role of low doses of native type II collagen in the rat model of osteoarthritis induced by sodium monoiodoacetate (MIA).

Methods

1, 3 and 10 mg kg-1 porcine native type II collagen were daily per os administered for 13 days starting from the day of MIA intra-articular injection.

Results

On day 14, collagen-treated rats showed a significant prevention of pain threshold alterations induced by MIA. Evaluation were performed on paws using mechanical noxious (Paw pressure test) or non-noxious (Electronic Von Frey test) stimuli, and a decrease of articular pain was directly measured on the damaged joint (PAM test). The efficacy of collagen in reducing pain was as higher as the dose was lowered. Moreover, a reduced postural unbalance, measured as hind limb weight bearing alterations (Incapacitance test), and a general improvement of motor activity (Animex test) were observed. Finally, the decrease of plasma and urine levels of CTX-II (Cross Linked C-Telopeptide of Type II Collagen), a biomarker of cartilage degradation, suggests a collagen-dependent decrease of structural joint damage.

Conclusions

These results describe the preclinical efficacy of low dosages of native type II collagen as pain reliever by a mechanism that involves a protective effect on cartilage.

Keywords

  • Monoiodoacetate
  • Oral tolerance
  • CTX-II
  • Articular pain

Background

Osteoarthritis pathophysiology involves the whole joint in a disease process that includes focal and progressive loss of hyaline articular cartilage. Concomitant changes in the bone underneath the cartilage involve formation of osteophytes and bony sclerosis, as well as alterations in the synovium and joint capsule [1]. Cartilage loss or degeneration may be a result of natural aging, obesity, repeated trauma or hormone disorders. The mechanical stress on the damaged joint irritates and inflames the cartilage causing joint pain and swelling [2, 3].

An integrative treatment of osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis, must consider a supplementation with collagen since it is the most prevalent component of the solid phase of articular cartilage [4]. The three major groups of collagen derivatives clinically used for arthritis treatment are based on the various degrees of hydrolysis of collagen: gelatin, collagen hydrolysate and native undenatured collagen [5]. Analogous working mechanisms has been described for gelatin and collagen hydrolysate: after oral administration peptides can be used as building blocks for the cartilage [68]. Moreover, it is hypothesized that collagen hydrolysate also influences bone metabolism [9, 10] or the vascular system involved in the atheromatous disease of the subchondral bone [11, 12]. For these purposes collagen hydrolysate is dosed in grams per day (usually 10 g) [1315]. On the contrary, undenatured collagen has been reported as beneficial for articular pain when per os administered in the order of milligrams [16, 17]. Undenatured collagen was preclinically and clinically studied mainly in rheumatoid arthritis [16, 17]; the autoimmune component of this pathology suggests a mechanism called oral tolerance, the usual response of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) to harmless gut antigens inducing local and systemic immunological tolerance [1820]. The knowledge about the relevance of low doses of undenatured collagen in osteoarthritis are more limited [21] and the absence of an immune component in the pathology of osteoarthritis make difficult to assume the oral tolerance as possible mechanism of collagen action.

In order to verify the efficacy of low doses of porcine native type II collagen as pain reliever and cartilage protector, we determined its pharmacological profile in a rat unilateral osteoarthritis induced by sodium monoiodoacetate (MIA).

Methods

Animals

For all the experiments described below, male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan, Varese, Italy) weighing approximately 200-250 g at the beginning of the experimental procedure were used. Animals were housed in CeSAL (Centro Stabulazione Animali da Laboratorio, University of Florence) and used at least one week after their arrival. Four rats were housed per cage (size 26 × 41 cm); animals were fed with standard laboratory diet and tap water ad libitum, and kept at 23 ± 1°C with a 12 h light/dark cycle, light at 7 a.m. All animal manipulations were carried out according to the European Community guidelines for animal care (DL 116/92, application of the European Communities Council Directive of 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC). The ethical policy of the University of Florence complies with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996; University of Florence assurance number: A5278-01). Formal approval to conduct the experiments described was obtained from the Animal Subjects Review Board of the University of Florence. Animals were anaesthetised before cervical dislocation. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used.

Monoiodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis

Unilateral osteoarthritis was also induced by injection of monoiodoacetate (MIA, Sigma-Aldrich) into the knee joint according to a described method [22, 23]. On day 1, rats were slightly anesthetized by 2% isoflurane, the left leg skin was sterilized with 75% ethyl alcohol and the knee located by palpation; then, a 28-gauge needle was inserted vertically to penetrate the skin and turned distally for insertion into the articular cavity until a distinct loss of resistance was felt. 2 mg MIA in 25 μl saline were delivered into the left articular cavity. Control rats received 25 μL of saline solution (day 1) in the knee joint. Behavioral and biochemical measures were performed at day 14.

Drug treatments

Porcine native type II collagen (Bioiberica, Spain) was suspended in 1% carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt (CMC) and administered by the per os (p.o.) route. 1, 3 or 10 mg kg-1 collagen were daily administered starting from the day 1 immediately after MIA injection to the 13th day. Behavioural and biochemical tests were performed 24 hours after the end of treatments. Control rats received p.o. CMC every day. For all tests blind experiments were performed.

Paw Pressure test

The nociceptive threshold in the rat was determined with an analgesimeter (Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy), according to the method described by [24]. Briefly, a constantly increasing pressure was applied to a small area of the dorsal surface of the paw using a blunt conical probe by a mechanical device. Mechanical pressure was increased until vocalization or a withdrawal reflex occurred while rats were lightly restrained. Vocalization or withdrawal reflex thresholds were expressed in grams. Rats scoring below 40 g or over 80 g during the test before drug administration were rejected (25%). For analgesia measures, mechanical pressure application was stopped at 120 g.

Von Frey test

The animals were placed in 20 cm x 20 cm plexiglas boxes equipped with a metallic meshy floor, 20 cm above the bench. A habituation of 15 minutes was allowed before the test. An electronic Von Frey hair unit (Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy) was used: the withdrawal threshold was evaluated by applying force ranging from 0 to 50 grams with a 0.2 gram accuracy. Punctuate stimulus was delivered to the mid-plantar area of each anterior paw from below the meshy floor through a plastic tip and the withdrawal threshold was automatically displayed on the screen. Paw sensitivity threshold was defined as the minimum pressure required to elicit a robust and immediate withdrawal reflex of the paw. Voluntary movements associated with locomotion were not taken as a withdrawal response. Stimuli were applied on each anterior paw with an interval of 5 seconds. The measure was repeated 5 times and the final value was obtained by averaging the 5 measures [25].

PAM test

The Pressure Application Measurement (PAM from Ugo Basile, Italy) was used to measure mechanical pain threshold of the knee jont. A force transducer (2 mm diameter) is mounted on the operator’s thumb and a progressive a quantified force was applied for direct stimulation of the joint. The rate of application of the force is decided by the operator. The force (gram-force; gf) which elicits the animal response (normally, limb withdrawal) was recorded. The value considered for each joint was the mean of 5 consecutive measurements. Data are expressed as the difference between the force tolerated on the knee joint contralateral to the injury and the force tolerated on the ipsilateral one (Δ Force).

Incapacitance test

Weight bearing changes were measured using an incapacitance apparatus (Linton Instrumentation, UK) detecting changes in postural equilibrium after a hind limb injury [26]. Rats were trained to stand on their hind paws in a box with an inclined plane (65° from horizontal). This box was placed above the incapacitance apparatus. This allowed us to independently measure the weight that the animal applied on each hind limb. The value considered for each animal was the mean of 5 consecutive measurements. In the absence of hind limb injury, rats applied an equal weight on both hind limbs, indicating a postural equilibrium, whereas an unequal distribution of the weight on hind limbs indicated a monolateral decreased pain threshold. Data are expressed as the difference between the weight applied on the limb contralateral to the injury and the weight applied on the ipsilateral one (Δ Weight).

Spontaneous activity meter (Animex)

Locomotor activity in rats was quantified using an Animex activity meter Type S (LKB, Farad, Sweden) set to maximum sensitivity. Every movement of rats, which were placed on the top of the Animex activity meter, produced a signal due to variation in inductance and capacity of the apparatus resonance circuit. Signals were converted automatically to numbers. On the day of the experiment the cage, containing three rats, were put on the measuring platform. Activity counts were made for 5 min.

CTX-II and CPII levels

On the day 14 plasma and urine samples were collected and analyzed to measure the Cross Linked C-Telopeptide of Type II Collagen (CTX- II) levels. Dosages were performed using ELISA assay (Antibodies online, Germania) by specific antibody. The method was in accordance to the procedure described by [27] for plasma and urine measure, respectively. Plasmatic levels of CPII, the carboxyl propeptide of type II procollagen, were also evaluated by ELISA assay (Ibex, Canada) according to [28, 29].

Statistic analysis

Results were expressed as means ± S.E.M. and the analysis of variance was performed by ANOVA. A Bonferroni’s significant difference procedure was used as post-hoc comparison. P values of less than 0.05 or 0.01 were considered significant. Data were analyzed using the “Origin 8.1” software.

Results

The pharmacological activity of low dosages of type II collagen was evaluated in the rat unilateral osteoarthritis model induced by MIA. 14 days after intra-articular MIA injection the mechanical withdrawal threshold to a noxious stimulus was measured by Paw pressure test (Figure 1). The weight tolerated on the ipsilateral paw was significantly reduced (42.2 ± 2.0 g) compared to the contralateral (77.0 ± 4.1 g). 1 mg kg-1 collagen administered daily p.o. for 13 days (starting from the day of MIA injection) increased the withdrawal threshold of the ipsilateral paw up to 67.5 ± 3.1 g. The doses of 3 and 10 mg kg-1 were significantly active but progressively less effective. Figure 2 shows the response to a non-noxious mechanical stimulus evaluated by the Von Frey test. On day 14 pain threshold of the ipsilateral paw (MIA + vehicle group) was decreased to 14.1 ± 2.0 g as compared to the contralateral (31.4 ± 4.2 g). Animals treated with 1 mg kg-1 collagen showed an ipsilateral threshold of 25.3 ± 4.0 g; the groups treated with higher dosage tolerated a stimulus of about 21 g. In both Paw pressure and Von Frey tests the pain sensitivity of the contralateral paw of MIA + vehicle or MIA + collagen groups was not different with respect to the control (vehicle + vehicle, data not shown). Articular pain was evaluated by PAM test, in Figure 3 the difference (Δ Force) between the force tolerated directly on the knee joint contralateral to the injury and the force tolerated on the ipsilateral one was described. Δ Force in control rats (vehicle + vehicle, 36.1 ± 21.1 gf) was dramatically increased on the day 14 in MIA + vehicle group (129.5 ± 10.1 gf). Collagen treatment prevented articular pain in a manner inversely proportional to the dose, reaching 15.8 ± 2.7 gf Δ Force in animals treated with 1 mg kg-1.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Pain: noxious stimulus, Paw-pressure test. Monoarthritis was induced by injection of MIA into the knee joint. On day 1, 2 mg MIA in 25 μl saline were delivered in the left (ipsilateral) articular cavity. Paw pressure test was performed on day 14. Collagen was suspended in 1% CMC and daily administered p.o. starting on the 1th day suddenly after MIA. Control animals were treated with vehicle. Each value represents the mean of 12 rats performed in 2 different experimental set.*P < 0.01 vs the contralateral paw; §P < 0.05 and ^P < 0.01 vs the MIA + vehicle treated rats.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Pain: non-noxious stimuli. Von Frey test was used to measure the response evoked by a mechanical stimulus 14 days after MIA injection. 1, 3 or 10 mg kg-1 collagen were p.o. administered every day starting on the 1th day suddenly after MIA. Control animals were treated with vehicle. Each value represents the mean of 12 rats performed in 2 different experimental set.*P < 0.01 vs contralateral paw; §P < 0.05 and ^P < 0.01 vs MIA + vehicle treated rats.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Articular pain, PAM test. The effect of collagen (daily administered starting on the 1th day) on MIA-induced articular damage was evaluated on day 14. Data are expressed as the difference between the force tolerated on the knee joint contralateral to the injury and the force tolerated on the ipsilateral one. Control animals were treated with vehicle. Each value represents the mean of 12 rats performed in 2 different experimental set. *P < 0.01 compared to vehicle + vehicle rats; §P < 0.05 and ^P < 0.01 compared to MIA + vehicle treated rats.

Unilateral pain was also able to induce hind limb weight bearing alterations (Incapacitance test): the difference between the weight burdened on the contralateral and the ipsilateral limb was significantly increased in MIA + vehicle (54.1 ± 5.3 g) with respect to vehicle + vehicle (4.3 ± 3.5). The protective effect of collagen was shown in Figure 4. Moreover, the Animex test showed a collagen-dependent improvement of motor activity increasing the number of movements by about 50% (Figure 5).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Hind limb weight bearing alterations, Incapacitance test. The effect of collagen (daily administered starting on day 1) on MIA-induced articular damage was evaluated on day 14. Data are expressed as the difference between the weight applied on the limb contralateral to the injury and the weight applied on the ipsilateral one. Control animals were treated with vehicle. Each value represents the mean of 12 rats performed in 2 different experimental set. *P < 0.01 vs vehicle + vehicle rats; §P < 0.05 and ^P < 0.01 vs MIA + vehicle treated rats.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Motor activity alterations, Animex test. Motor capability was observed by measuring the number of movements in 5 minutes on a free surface. The test was performed 14 days after MIA injection and effect of daily repeated collagen administration starting from the day 1 was evaluated. Control animals were treated with vehicle. Each value represents the mean of 12 rats performed in 2 different experimental set. *P < 0.01 compared to vehicle + vehicle rats; §P < 0.05 and ^P < 0.01 compared to MIA + vehicle treated rats.

Biochemical analysis of biological fluids performed 14 days after MIA injection, allowed to observe a 4 fold increase of CTX-II in plasma of MIA + vehicle rats compared to the control group (vehicle + vehicle). The plasmatic CTX-II increase was reduced by 53% in the rats treated with 1 mg kg-1 collagen and by 40% in those treated with the higher doses (Figure 6). The same parameter was increased by MIA also in urine (2.6 fold with respect to the control); 3 mg kg-1 collagen induced the higher protective effect (75% inhibition compared to MIA + vehicle; Figure 7). 1, 3 and 10 mg kg-1 collagen daily administered p.o. for 14 days, in the absence of articular damage, did not alter CTX-II levels in plasma and urine (data not shown). In Table 1 are shown the plasmatic levels of the collagen synthesis marker CPII. MIA-induced articular damage evoked an increase of CPII that is unaltered by collagen repeated treatments.
Figure 6
Figure 6

CTX-II, plasma levels. On day 1, 2 mg MIA in 25 μl saline were delivered in the left knee articular cavity. Collagen was suspended in 1% CMC and p.o. daily administered starting on day 1. Control animals were treated with vehicle. On day 14 plasma samples were collected and analyzed by ELISA kit. Each value represents the mean of 12 rats performed in 2 different experimental set. *P < 0.01 compared to vehicle + vehicle rats; §P < 0.05 and ^P < 0.01 compared to MIA + vehicle treated rats.

Figure 7
Figure 7

CTX-II, urine levels. On day 1, 2 mg MIA in 25 μl saline were delivered in the left knee articular cavity. Collagen was suspended in 1% CMC and p.o. daily administered starting on day 1. Control animals were treated with vehicle. On day 14 urine samples were collected and analyzed by ELISA kit. Each value represents the mean of 12 rats performed in 2 different experimental set. *P < 0.01 with respect to vehicle + vehicle rats; §P < 0.05 and ^P < 0.01 compared MIA + vehicle treated rats.

Table 1

CPII levels

CPII LEVELS (ng mL-1)

 

MIA

 

vehicle + vehicle

vehicle

collagen 1 mg kg-1

collagen3 mg kg-1

collagen10 mg kg-1

plasma

232 ± 12

454 ± 31*

500 ± 28

486 ± 23

505 ± 32

2 mg MIA/25 μl were delivered in the left knee articular cavity on day 1 Collagen was p.o. daily administered starting on the same day. On day 14 plasma samples were collected and analyzed by ELISA kit. Each value represents the mean of 6 rats performed in 2 different experimental set. *P<0.01 compared to vehicle + vehicle rats.

Discussion

Osteoarthritis, also called degenerative joint disease, is a chronic pathology frequently seen in knee, hip, spine and hand causing pain, stiffness, decreased range of motion, and reduced quality of life for million people throughout the world [5]. It is by far the most widespread joint-affecting disease. According to the World Health Organization, osteoarthritis is the sixth-leading cause of disability in the world [30], being comparable to that of asthma [31, 32]. It is estimated that it affects over 12% of the total population in the USA [33], compared with 0.6% for rheumatoid arthritis [34]. The prevalence of osteoarthritis increases with age because the condition is not spontaneously reversible [35]. Almost 9.6% of men and 18.0% of women ages 60 years in the world are thought to have symptomatic osteoarthritis [36]. Given the increasing incidence of osteoarthritis with age, the extended life expectancy observed in the Western world (for example 20% of the Italian population is age > 65 years; [37]) is expected to result in a progressively higher number of people affected by this pathology.

The usual management of patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis requires a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological modalities of therapy. Pharmacological treatments include acetaminophen, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) non-selective and selective oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), topical NSAIDs and capsaicin, intra-articular injections of corticosteroids and hyaluronates, glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulphate for symptom relief. Glucosamine sulphate, chondroitin sulphate and diacerein have possible structure-modifying effects [38]. The characteristic of chronicity determines the need of new active disease modifying drugs.

In the present research osteoarthritis was mimicked in rats injecting MIA in the knee joint. The intra-articular injection of MIA induces necrosis of condrocytes with decrease of cartilage thickness and osteolysis [23], in the presence of a relevant component of oxidative stress [39]. Kobayashi et al. [40] showed that MIA is able to disorganize condrocytes and to promote cartilage erosion. These alterations are comparable with joint damages typical of humans affected by osteoarthritis [22, 41, 42].

In our experiments behavioral and biochemical features were evaluated 14 days after MIA injection, when pain as well as the degenerative articular process are overt [42, 43]. At this time, CTX-II levels were strongly increased as measured in urine and plasma. CTX-II is a C-terminal peptide generated by the concerted action of matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) on the fibrillar type II collagen, and it is considered a biomarker of cartilage degradation [44, 45]. Its level was found to correlate with cartilage loss in animal models of osteoarthritis [46]. In agreement, clinical studies showed increased CTX-II levels in patients with osteoathritis compared with controls [47, 48].

Type II collagen is the principal molecular component of mammalian cartilages [4]: the present work is focused on the study of this fibrous protein as preventive of MIA-induced articular damage. Different dosages of native type II collagen were daily administered per os for 14 days starting from the day of MIA injection. 1-10 mg dose range was chosen on the bases of the efficacy demonstrated in rheumatoid arthritis models [17]. Lower doses, in particular 1 mg kg-1, was able to strongly prevent pain behavior when evaluated both as an increase on suprathreshold stimulation (hyperalgesia-related measure) or as pain threshold decrease (allodynia-related measure). Collagen was able to reduce pain on the paw ipsilateral to the MIA injection. Since articular pain and joint tenderness are the most frequent and disabling symptoms [5] we evaluated also the animal responses to a direct stimulation of knee joint. The efficacy of collagen on reducing articular pain progressively increased lowering in the dose. Moreover, collagen-dependent pain relief allowed also to reduce postural unbalance, a feature of disease progression [26], as measured by hind limb weight bearing alterations. A general improvement of motor activity was observed.

The behavioral positive effects of collagen may be related to a prevention of articular damage since CTX-II levels were reduced in urine and in plasma of collagen-treated rats. On the other hand, low dosed collagen did not promote the synthesis of new collagen given that the plasmatic levels of CPII, the carboxyl propeptide of type II procollagen [28, 29], was not altered by 14 days of collagen treatment.

The higher efficacy of the lower dose and, in general, the low dosages administered in the present work do not justify a mechanism founded on cartilage structure supplementation, as confirmed by the lack of CPII increase. Moreover, cartilage has limited repair capabilities and cartilage damage is difficult to heal since chondrocytes are bound in lacunae and they cannot migrate to damaged areas; hyaline cartilage does not have a blood supply and the deposition of new matrix is slow [49]. Other working mechanisms remain to be explored.

In rheumatoid arthritis the induction of oral tolerance was suggested as mechanism for the beneficial effect on pain evoked by low doses of native collagen [17, 50]. The relevance of oral tolerance has been described for pathologies related to immune dysregulations and for autoimmune diseases [51], indeed a complex immune mechanism contribute to the pathology of rheumatoid arthritis [16, 52]. The proposed mechanism for collagen-induced oral tolerance is that dendritic cells in the GALT take up the collagen and present it to T cells to generate regulatory T cells. Regulatory T cells control the immune response inducing several inhibitory cytokines, such as transforming growth factor β and interleukin 10, while decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines [17, 53].

To the actual knowledge osteoarthritis has not immune characteristic, but shares with rheumatoid arthritis cartilage degradation and the consequent inflammatory response. The role of oral tolerance in the management of osteoarthritis remains to be investigated. However, future research focused on the pharmacodynamic study of collagen therapeutic effects could offer new insights in osteoarthritis pathophysiology.

Conclusions

Low dose collagen decrease pain induced by the intrarticular injection of MIA, a rat model of articular damage that mimics osteoarthritis alteration. Treated animals showed a reduced postural unbalance and a general improvement of motor activity. The decrease of CTX-II levels in urine and plasma suggests a protective effect on cartilage. This evidence highlights the interest for further investigation about the mechanism of low dose collagen and its relevance in osteoarthritis therapy.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The present research is funded by the Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and Research and by the University of Florence.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health - Neurofarba - Pharmacology and Toxicology Section, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy

References

  1. Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, Kington RS, Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Zhang Y, Sowers M, McAlindon T, Spector TD, Poole AR, Yanovski SZ, Ateshian G, Sharma L, Buckwalter JA, Brandt KD, Fries JF: Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2000, 133: 635-646. 10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mow VC, Setton LA, Fuilak F, Ratcliffe A: Mechanical factors in articular cartilage and their role in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritic disorders. Edited by: Kuettner KE, Goldberg VM. 1995, Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 147-172.Google Scholar
  3. ANON: Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Arth Rheum. 2000, 43: 1905-1915.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Eyre D: Articular cartilage and changes in Arthritis: Collagen of articular cartilage. Arthritis Res. 2002, 4: 30-35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Van Vijven JPJ, Luijsterburg PAJ, Verhagen AP, Van Osch GJVM, Kloppenburg M, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA: Symptomatic and chondroprotective treatment with collagen derivatives in osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2012, 20: 809-821. 10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Oesser S, Adam M, Babel W, Seifert J: Oral administration of (14)C labelled gelatin hydrolysate leads to an accumulation of radioactivity in cartilage of mice (C57/BL). J Nutr. 1999, 129: 1891-1895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Oesser S, Seifert J: Stimulation of type II collagen biosynthesis and secretion in bovine chondrocytes cultured with degraded collagen. Cell Tissue Res. 2003, 311: 393-399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schunck M, Schulze CH, Oesser S: Disparate efficacy of collagen hydrolysate and glucosamine on the extracellular matrix metabolism of articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006, 14: S114-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Koyama Y, Hirota AH, Irie S: Ingestion of gelatin has differential effect on bone mineral density and body weight in protein undernutrition. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2001, 47: 84-86. 10.3177/jnsv.47.84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nomura Y, Oohashi K, Watanabe M, Kasugai S: Increase in bone mineral density through oral administration of shark gelatin to ovariectomized rats. Nutrition. 2005, 21: 1120-1126. 10.1016/j.nut.2005.03.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Faria M, Da Costa EL, Gontijo JAR, Netto FM: Evaluation of the hypotensive potential of bovine and porcine collagen hydrolysates. J Med Food. 2008, 11: 560-567. 10.1089/jmf.2007.0573.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang Y, Koguchi T, Simizu M, Ohmori T, Takahata Y, Morimatsu F: Chicken collagen hydrolysate protects rats from hypertension and cardiovascular damage. J Med Food. 2010, 13: 399-405. 10.1089/jmf.2009.1246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McCarthy S, Carpenter MR, Barrell MM, Morrissey DE, Jacobson E, Kline G:The effectiveness of gelatine supplementation treatment in individuals with symptoms of mild osteoarthritis. A randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study.US Family Practice News; American Academy of Family Physicians. 2000, Dallas (TX): Annual Assembly,Google Scholar
  14. Moskowitz RW: Role of collagen hydrolysate in bone and joint disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 30: 87-99. 10.1053/sarh.2000.9622.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McAlindon TE, Nuite M, Krishnan N, Ruthazer R, Price LL, Burstein D, Griffith J, Flechsenhar K: Change in knee osteoarthritis cartilage detected by delayed gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging following treatment with collagen hydrolysate: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2011, 19: 399-405. 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wei W, Zhang LL, Xu JH, Xiao F, Bao CD, Ni LQ, Li XF, Wu YQ, Sun LY, Zhang RH, Sun BL, Xu SQ, Liu S, Zhang W, Shen J, Liu HX, Wang RC: A multicenter, double blind, randomized, controlled phase III clinical trial of chicken type II collagen in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009, 11: R180-10.1186/ar2870.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Park KS, Park MJ, Cho ML, Kwok SK, Ju JH, Ko HJ, Park SH, Kim HY: Type II collagen oral tolerance; mechanism and role in collagen-induced arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2009, 19: 581-589. 10.1007/s10165-009-0210-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mowat AM: Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003, 3: 331-341. 10.1038/nri1057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Coombes JL, Powrie F: Dendritic cells in intestinal immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008, 8: 435-446. 10.1038/nri2335.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Ilan Y: Oral tolerance: Can we make it work?. Hum Immunol. 2009, 70: 768-776. 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.06.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Crowley DC, Lau FC, Sharma P, Evans M, Guthrie N, Bagchi M, Bagchi D, Dey DK, Raychaudhuri SP: Safety and efficacy of undenatured type II collagen in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a clinical trial. Int J Med Sci. 2009, 6: 312-321.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Guingamp C, Gegout-Pottie P, Philippe L, Terlain B, Netter P, Gillet P: Mono iodoacetate-induced experimental osteoarthritis: a dose-response study of loss of mobility, morphology, and biochemistry. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40: 1670-1679. 10.1002/art.1780400917.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pomonis JD, Boulet JM, Gottshall SL, Phillips S, Sellers R, Bunton T, Walker K: Development and pharmacological characterization of a rat model of osteoarthritis pain. Pain. 2005, 114: 339-346. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leighton GE, Rodriguez RE, Hill RG, Hughes J: k-opioid agonist produce antinociception after i.v. and i.c.v. but not intrathecal administration in the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1988, 93: 553-560. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb10310.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Sakurai M, Egashira N, Kawashiri T, Yano T, Ikesue H, Oishi R: Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in the rat: involvement of oxalate in cold hyperalgesia but not mechanical allodynia. Pain. 2009, 147: 165-174. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.09.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bove SE, Calcaterra SL, Brooker RM, Huber CM, Guzman RE: Weight bearing as a measure of disease progression and efficacy of anti-inflammatory compounds in a model of monosodium iodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2003, 11: 821-830. 10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00163-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Oestergaard S, Chouinard L, Doyle N, Karsdal MA, Smith SY, Qvist P, Tankó LB: The utility of measuring C-terminal telopeptides of collagen type II (CTX-II) in serum and synovial fluid samples for estimation of articular cartilage status in experimental models of destructive joint diseases. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006, 14: 670-679. 10.1016/j.joca.2006.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Driban JB, Barr AE, Amin M, Sitler MR, Barbe MF: Joint Inflammation and Early Degeneration Induced by High-Force Reaching Are Attenuated by Ibuprofen in an Animal Model ofWork-RelatedMusculoskeletal Disorder. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011, 2011: 691412-10.1155/2011/691412.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Yamaguchi S, Aoyama T, Ito A, Nagai M, Iijima H, Zhang X, Tajino J, Kuroki H: Effects of Exercise Level on Biomarkers in a Rat Knee Model of Osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2013, 31: 1026-1031. 10.1002/jor.22332.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Symmons D, Mathers C, Pfleger B: Global burden of osteoarthritis in the year 2000. 2003, Geneva: World Health Organization,http://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper50.pdf,Google Scholar
  31. Mathers CD, Vos ET, Stevenson CE, Begg SJ: The Australian burden of disease study: measuring the loss of health from diseases, injuries and risk factors. Med J Aust. 2000, 172: 592-596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Piscitelli P, Iolascon G, Di Tanna G, Bizzi E, Chitano G, Argentiero A, Neglia C, Giolli L, Distante A, Gimigliano R, Brandi ML, Migliore A: Socioeconomic burden of total joint arthroplasty for symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis in the Italian population: a 5-year analysis based on hospitalization records. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012, 64: 1320-1327. 10.1002/acr.21706.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Jordan JM, Katz JN, Kremers HM, Wolfe F: National Arthritis Data Workgroup: Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58: 26-35. 10.1002/art.23176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Helmick CG, Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Kwoh CK, Liang MH, Kremers HM, Mayes MD, Merkel PA, Pillemer SR, Reveille JD, Stone JH: National Arthritis Data Workgroup: Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part I. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58: 15-25. 10.1002/art.23177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shane Anderson A, Loeser RF: Why is osteoarthritis an agerelated disease?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010, 24: 15-26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. World Health Organization: The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. 2003, Geneva: WHO technical report series 919Google Scholar
  37. Italian Statistics Rome: National Institute for Statistics. 2005,http://www3.istat.it/dati/catalogo/asi2005/contenuti.html,Google Scholar
  38. Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II. OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008, 16: 137-62. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Di Cesare Mannelli L, Bani D, Bencini A, Brandi ML, Calosi L, Cantore M, Carossino AM, Ghelardini C, Valtancoli B, Failli P: Therapeutic Effects of the Superoxide Dismutase Mimetic Compound Me2DO2A on Experimental Articular Pain in Rats. Mediat Inflamm. 2013, 10.1155/2013/905360.Google Scholar
  40. Kobayashi K, Imaizumi R, Sumichika H, Tanaka H, Goda M, Fukunari A, Komatsu H: Sodium iodoacetate-induced experimental osteoarthritis and associated pain model in rats. J Vet Med Sci. 2003, 65: 1195-1199. 10.1292/jvms.65.1195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. van der Kraan PM, Vitters EL, van de Putte LB, van den Berg WB: Development of osteoarthritic lesions in mice by “metabolic” and “mechanical” alterations in the knee joints. Am J Pathol. 1989, 135: 1001-1014.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Guzman RE, Evans MG, Bove S, Morenko B, Kilgore K: Mono-iodoacetate-induced histologic changes in subchondral bone and articular cartilage of rat femorotibial joints: an animal model of osteoarthritis. Toxicol Pathol. 2003, 31: 619-624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Izumi M, Ikeuchi M, Ji Q, Tani T: Local ASIC3 modulates pain and disease progression in a rat model of osteoarthritis. J Biomed Sci. 2012, 19: 77-10.1186/1423-0127-19-77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Rousseau JC, Delmas PD: Biological markers in osteoarthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007, 3: 346-56. 10.1038/ncprheum0508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. De Ceuninck F, Sabatini M, Pastoureau P: Recent progress toward biomarker identification in osteoarthritis. Drug Discovery Today. 2011, 16: 443-449. 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. De Ceuninck F, Sabatini M, Renoux V, De Nanteuil G, Pastoureau P: Urinary collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments are sensitive markers of matrix metalloproteinase-dependent cartilage degradation in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003, 130: 1561-1564.Google Scholar
  47. Sowers MF, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Yosef M, Jannausch M, Jiang Y, Garnero P, Jacobson J: Longitudinal changes of serum COMP and urinary CTX-II predict X-ray defined knee osteoarthritis severity and stiffness in women. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009, 17: 1609-1614. 10.1016/j.joca.2009.06.001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharif F, Kirwan J, Charni N, Sandell LJ, Whittles C, Garnero P: A 5-yr longitudinal study of type IIA collagen synthesis and total type II collagen degradation in patients with knee osteoarthritis – association with disease progression. Rheumatology. 2007, 46: 938-943. 10.1093/rheumatology/kel409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Chen FH, Rousche KT, Tuan RS: Technology Insight: adult stem cells in cartilage regeneration and tissue engineering. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006, 2: 373-382. 10.1038/ncprheum0216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagler-Anderson C, Bober LA, Robinson ME, Siskind GW, Thorbecke GJ: Suppression of type II collagen-induced arthritis by intragastric administration of soluble type II collagen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986, 83: 7443-7446. 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7443.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Castro-Sánchez P, Martín-Villa JM: Gut immune system and oral tolerance. Br J Nutr. 2013, 109 (Suppl 2): S3-S11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Trentham DE, Dynesius-Trentham RA, Orav EJ, Combitchi D, Lorenzo C, Sewell KL, Hafler DA, Weiner HL: Effects of oral administration of type II collagen on rheumatoid arthritis. Science. 1993, 261: 1727-1730. 10.1126/science.8378772.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. McDole JR, Wheeler LW, McDonald KG, Wang B, Konjufca V, Knoop KA, Newberry RD, Miller MJ: Goblet cells deliver luminal antigen to CD103+ dendritic cells in the small intestine. Nature. 2012, 483: 345-349. 10.1038/nature10863.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/14/228/prepub

Copyright

Advertisement