Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound enhances callus consolidation in distraction osteogenesis of the tibia by the technique of lengthening over the nail procedure

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 20, Article number: 108 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been widely accepted in promoting the fracture healing process. However, there have been limited clinical trials focused on the efficacy of LIPUS during distraction osteogenesis (DO) by the technique of lengthening over the nail procedure. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of LIPUS during DO.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 30 patients (60 segments) who underwent simultaneous bilateral tibial lengthening over the nail. The patients were grouped into the LIPUS group and the control group based on LIPUS stimulation. The two patient groups were compared for demographic data (sex, age at operation, preoperative height, BMI, and smoking history), qualitative assessments of the callus (callus shape and type), external fixation index, and four cortical healing indexes.

Results

Fifteen patients (30 segments) were classified as the LIPUS group, and another 15 patients (30 segments) were classified as the control group. No significant differences were found in the assessed demographic data between the groups. LIPUS stimulated a more cylindrical, more homogenous, and denser type of callus formation at the end of the distraction phase. The two groups exhibited equivalent outcomes in terms of external fixation index (p = 0.579). However, significant differences were found in healing indexes of the anterior and medial cortices (p <  0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). The healing indexes of those cortices in the LIPUS group (mean of 36.6 days/cm and 32.5 days/cm, respectively) reflected their significantly faster healing compared to the control group (mean HI of 57.5 days/cm and 44.2 days/cm, respectively). There were no LIPUS-related complications.

Conclusions

LIPUS is a noninvasive and effective adjuvant therapy to enhance callus maturation during DO. It enhances callus consolidation and may have a positive effect on the appropriate callus shape and type.

Peer Review reports

Background

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) using an external fixator has been successfully used in limb lengthening for short stature or limb length discrepancy. The consolidation of regenerated callus during DO can be affected by various factors including host factors (age and underlying disease), local factors (adjacent soft tissue condition and concomitant infection), and surgical factors (surgical technique, stability of the frame, and modulation of the distraction rhythm) [1,2,3,4]. Long-term external fixation, related to delayed consolidation, may lead to complications such as pin site infection and adjacent joint contracture, as well as subsequent socioeconomic and psychological burdens on the patient [3, 5].

To reduce these complications and burdens on the patient, several techniques have been employed to enhance callus maturation. Local application of autogenous and allogenous iliac bone, biphasic calcium phosphate [6], platelet-rich plasma (PRP) [7, 8], and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) [9] have been used to induce biological stimulation of callus consolidation. Furthermore, systemic application of parathyroid hormone [10], growth hormone [11], and bisphosphonate [12] have been investigated. However, further investigation of the optimal dose and potential risk of complications of these biological materials is required for their wide clinical use.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), which has been widely accepted for promoting the fracture healing process [13,14,15,16,17], may be another option for adjuvant therapy to accelerate consolidation of the regenerated callus. Although there have been several in vivo studies evaluating the efficacy of LIPUS on callus maturation during DO [18,19,20,21,22,23], there have been limited clinical trials focused on the efficacy of LIPUS during DO [24,25,26]. Therefore, this clinical investigation was performed to evaluate the efficacy of LIPUS during DO under the hypothesis that LIPUS would enhance callus maturation.

Methods

The medical and radiographic records of patients who underwent tibial lengthening in our institute from October 2009 to October 2015 were reviewed. Only patients who were skeletally mature, underwent simultaneous bilateral tibial lengthening over the nail, and had no medical illness (such as bone metabolic disorders or neuromuscular disorders) or history of trauma were included. Patients who developed an infection (including pin-site infection and acute osteomyelitis) during DO, received adjuvant therapy other than LIPUS, exhibited a lack of compliance, or had incomplete medical and radiographic records were excluded. A total of 30 patients (60 tibiae) were enrolled in this study. The mean age at tibial lengthening was 22.1 years (17.5–34.0), and the patients were followed for an average of 5.6 years (1.7–8.2).

Surgical procedure

The tibial lengthening over the nail procedure was performed by the senior author (HRS) using an Ilizarov apparatus (U & I Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea) and AO unreamed tibial nails. At the mid-diaphyseal level, a transverse osteotomy was performed using the multiple-drill-hole method. At the time of osteotomy, the nail was concomitantly inserted and reached the distal metaphysis as the development of a valgus or varus deformity was monitored. Two proximal interlocking screws were inserted in the medio-lateral direction. The preconstructed Ilizarov apparatus was then mounted to the tibia. Range of motion exercises for the adjacent joints and full weight bearing were started on postoperative day 3. After 7–10 days of consolidation, tibial lengthening was initiated at a rate of 0.25 mm every 6 h. The actual distraction rhythm was determined depending on the morphological features of the callus in each case [27]. After achieving the desired length, the intramedullary nail was interlocked. The external fixator was removed when we observed a bridging callus at 2 of 4 cortices on plain radiographs. A short leg cast was used for the next 2 weeks to prevent a regenerate fracture, and a brace was then applied until complete consolidation of at least 3 of 4 cortices. The patients were followed every week during the first month, every 2 weeks during the distraction phase, and then monthly during the consolidation phase.

LIPUS protocol

LIPUS stimulation was initiated during the distraction phase and maintained until the early consolidation phase. It was performed over the corticotomy site and the distraction gap for 20 min a day. A well-trained physician carried out the LIPUS and instructed the patient on the procedure during the hospitalization, and the patients performed self-treatment after discharge. The compliance of each patient was confirmed in the out-patient clinic by assessing the remaining usage of the device. The Sonic Accelerated Fracture Healing System (Exogen Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA) and BH-1000 ultrasound bone healing device (Orthoheal, Seoul, Korea) were used for the LIPUS. The characteristics of the LIPUS signal were a frequency of 1.5 MHz, a signal repetition rate of 1 kHz, a pulse width of 200 μs, 117 mW of power, and an intensity of 30 mW/cm2 [26, 28].

Evaluations

The patients were grouped into the LIPUS group and the control group based on LIPUS. To investigate the efficacy of LIPUS during DO, the two patient groups were compared for demographic data (sex, age at operation, preoperative height, BMI, and smoking history), qualitative assessments of the callus [27], external fixation index, and four cortical healing indexes.

Radiographic evaluations were performed using standard tibia/fibula anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and a slit scanogram (as described by Bell and Thompson) [29] both before tibial lengthening and at every postoperative visit at the out-patient clinic. Initial tibial length, amount of lengthening, and lengthening percentage were assessed. The callus shape and type according to Li et al. [27] were assessed for qualitative assessments of the callus. The callus shape was classified as fusiform, cylindrical, concave, lateral, or central. The callus type was classified as normal-, intermediate-, or low-density. These parameters were investigated twice, at the end of the distraction phase and at the time of external fixator removal, to observe the progression of callus maturation. The external fixation index (EFI) was calculated as the duration of external fixation in days divided by the length gained in cm, and the external fixator was removed when a bridging callus was observed at 2 of 4 cortices. In comparison, the healing index (HI) was calculated as the duration of complete consolidation in days divided by the length gained in cm, and complete consolidation was defined as formation of cortical bridging at at least 3 of 4 cortices.

Additionally, complications other than infection (including pin-site infection and acute osteomyelitis) were assessed [3].

Statistical analysis

We used the Mann-Whitney test for continuous data not following a normal distribution and the independent t-test for continuous data following a normal distribution. Categorical data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 20.0 (SPSS, IBM Corp., Chicago, IL). P-values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Fifteen patients (30 tibial segments) were classified as the LIPUS group (Fig. 1), and another 15 patients (30 tibial segments) were classified as the control group (Fig. 2). The demographic data of the LIPUS and control groups are presented in Table 1. No significant differences between the groups were found for the assessed demographic data including sex, age at operation, preoperative height, BMI, and smoking history. In addition, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of the initial tibial length and amount and percentage of tibial lengthening (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Sequential radiographic images of the left tibia in a 22-year-old female patient who received low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) after 7.3 cm of tibial lengthening. At the end of the distraction phase, the anteroposterior (AP) (a) and lateral (b) images show a callus with a cylindrical shape and intermediate density. At the time of external fixator removal, the AP (c) and lateral (d) images show progression of callus consolidation with a cylindrical shape and normal density. The external fixation index of the patient was 29.6 days/cm. At 9 months postoperation, the AP (e) and lateral (f) images show full corticalization of the regenerated callus

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Sequential radiographic images of the left tibia in a 19-year-old female patient without low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) stimulation after 8.1 cm of tibial lengthening. At the end of the distraction phase, the anteroposterior (AP) (a) and lateral (b) images show a callus with a cylindrical shape and low density. At the time of external fixator removal, the AP (c) and lateral (d) images show progression of callus consolidation with a cylindrical shape and intermediate density. The external fixation index of the patient was 29.4 days/cm. At 17 months postoperation, the AP (e) and lateral (f) images show full corticalization of the regenerated callus

Full size image
Table 1 Demographic data of patients undergoing bilateral tibial lengthening
Full size table
Table 2 Radiographic comparison between the LIPUS and control groups
Full size table

The callus shape and type, classified according to Li et al. [27], for each treatment group are presented in Table 3. At the end of the distraction phase, there were significant differences in callus shape and type between the groups (p = 0.005 and p <  0.001, respectively). Calluses of the LIPUS group were more cylindrical, more homogenous, and denser type than those of the control group. At the time of external fixator removal, however, no significant differences were observed between the groups in callus shape and type (p = 0.055 and p = 0.313, respectively).

Table 3 Comparison of callus shape and type according to Li et al. [27] between the two groups
Full size table

There was no significant difference in the EFI between the groups. However, significant differences were found in the HIs of the anterior and medial cortices (p <  0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) (Table 2). The HIs of those cortices in the LIPUS group (mean of 36.6 days/cm and 32.5 days/cm, respectively) reflected their significantly faster healing compared to the control group (mean HI of 57.5 days/cm and 44.2 days/cm, respectively).

Six complications were encountered in the LIPUS group, whereas five complications occurred in the control group (Table 4). Equinus deformity was the most common complication in both groups and was managed using a Vulpius procedure with or without gradual distraction through application of an additional foot frame. One case of impending compartment syndrome developed in the LIPUS group, and the patient required a fasciotomy at 1 day postoperation. In addition, valgus angulation of the tibia was seen in one patient in the control group. The patient refused to undergo any intervention to treat the deformity, and the deformity persisted without any further symptoms. No LIPUS-related complications developed in the LIPUS group.

Table 4 Comparison of complications between the two groups
Full size table

Discussion

We performed a clinical investigation on the efficacy of LIPUS during DO. The findings of the current study showed that LIPUS stimulated a more cylindrical, more homogenous, and denser type of callus formation in the early stage of DO (at the end of distraction phase) and promoted faster callus consolidation, especially in the anterior and medial cortices.

LIPUS is a mechanical stimulation method using high-frequency acoustic pressure waves. It is speculated that LIPUS exerts low-magnitude mechanical stress at the application site and acts through a functional loading effect [30]. This may provoke a cascade of biological responses during cellular reaction processes in the inflammation, angiogenesis, chondrogenesis, and endochondral and intramembranous ossification stages, as well as the bone remodeling period [18, 30]. Accordingly, LIPUS stimulates differentiation and proliferation of osteogenic cells, activation of osteoblasts, and synthesis of osteocalcin [23]. Expression of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and synthesis of fibroblast growth factor (FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and prostaglandin E2 are also increased via LIPUS stimulation [17, 31,32,33,34].

To produce acceptable outcomes with LIPUS therapy, a well-formulated LIPUS protocol is required. The LIPUS protocol established in previous studies is a frequency of 1.5 MHz, a signal repetition rate of 1 kHz, a pulse width of 200 μs, and an intensity of 30 mW/cm2 with a 20-min application time per day [23, 26, 28, 35]. Because these previous studies achieved satisfactory outcomes via LIPUS during either DO or fracture healing, this study was conducted using the same LIPUS protocol: the characteristics of the LIPUS signal were a frequency of 1.5 MHz, a signal repetition rate of 1 kHz, a pulse width of 200 μs, 117 mW of power, and an intensity of 30 mW/cm2.

In this study, LIPUS stimulation was initiated during the distraction phase; however, the timing for application of LIPUS during DO is not standardized [26]. Most studies have preferred to conduct LIPUS during the consolidation phase [18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 36]. However, we hypothesized that LIPUS could play an important role in enhancing callus consolidation when applied during the distraction phase because active angiogenesis, which is closely related to mineralization in the distraction gap, occurs during the distraction phase [37]. Aronson demonstrated that regional blood flow at the corticotomy site increases 10-fold during the early distraction phase [38]. This increased blood flow decreases after surgery but remains up to 3 times greater than normal until 17 weeks postoperation. The increase in blood flow in this phase leads to an increase in hematopoietic function, differentiation of pluripotential cells, and active angiogenesis [37].

The efficacy of LIPUS is debatable. Recently, Simpson et al. [39] demonstrated that callus consolidation was not significantly stimulated by LIPUS therapy but was stimulated by smoking status. A meta-analysis including the mentioned study [40] concluded that LIPUS influenced neither treatment time nor decrease in risk of complications. However, several clinical trials have suggested the effectiveness of LIPUS on DO (Table 5). El-Mowafi and Mohsen [24] demonstrated that LIPUS induced a 38% significant reduction in the HI using the conventional Ilizarov technique. Salem and Schmelz [26] found that LIPUS reduced the HI by 27% in posttraumatic tibial defects after comminuted diaphyseal tibial fractures. Dudda et al. also concluded that the EFI could be shortened in patients who receive LIPUS therapy (32.8 days/cm in the LIPUS group and 44.6 days/cm in the control group), although their data did not achieve statistical significance [25]. In addition, Tsumaki et al. found that LIPUS therapy significantly increased bone mineral density, accelerates callus maturation, and reduced the duration of external fixation application [41]. Concurrent with these previous studies, the current study also indicated that LIPUS improved the quality of the callus with a more cylindrical, more homogenous, and denser type of callus formation and led to faster callus consolidation, especially in the anterior and medial cortices. In addition, no LIPUS-related complications developed among the LIPUS group during the study.

Table 5 Healing index in previous comparative studies demonstrating the efficacy of LIPUS stimulation during tibial lengthening
Full size table

This study demonstrated that LIPUS enhanced callus consolidation, especially in sites with a thin covering of soft tissue (anterior and medial cortices). It is known that inadequate soft tissue coverage is closely related to late consolidation of the regenerated callus during DO; hence, calluses on these two cortices have a higher risk of delayed consolidation than those of the posterior and lateral cortices [7]. However, a thinner covering of soft tissue causes less attenuation of the LIPUS signal [23], which may increase the efficacy of LIPUS stimulation on the anterior and medial cortices during DO.

However, in terms of EFI, no significant positive effect was observed by LIPUS stimulation. We supposed that this finding was related to the lengthening over the nail procedure used in the current study. It is possible to remove the external fixator after achieving consolidation of only 2 of 4 cortices using the lengthening over the nail procedure, while it is safe to remove the external fixator after achieving complete consolidation of at least 3 of 4 cortices using the conventional Ilizarov procedure.

This study was limited by its retrospective nature. Also, the number of patients opting for LIPUS was not large enough due to the added cost of the therapy, limiting the number of patients recruited. These factors could affect the statistical significance. Nevertheless, all patients in this study were surgically treated by a single surgeon at a single institution with the same standardized LIPUS protocol. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the efficacy of LIPUS during DO by the technique of lengthening over the nail procedure.

Conclusions

LIPUS is a noninvasive and effective adjuvant therapy to enhance callus maturation during DO. It also enhances callus consolidation and may have a positive effect on appropriate callus shape and type.

Abbreviations

DBM:

Demineralized bone matrix

DO:

Distraction osteogenesis

EFI:

External fixation index

FGF:

Fibroblast growth factor

HI:

Healing index

LIPUS:

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound

PDGF:

Platelet-derived growth factor

PRP:

Platelet-rich plasma

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. 1.

    Fischgrund J, Paley D, Suter C. Variables affecting time to bone healing during limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:31–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Guo Q, Zhang T, Zheng Y, Feng S, Ma X, Zhao F. Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail in patients with short stature or leg-length discrepancy: a comparative study. Int Orthop. 2012;36(1):179–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sabharwal S. Enhancement of bone formation during distraction osteogenesis: pediatric applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(2):101–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Faber FW, Keessen W, van Roermund PM. Complications of leg lengthening. 46 procedures in 28 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62(4):327–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Arinzeh TL, Tran T, McAlary J, Daculsi G. A comparative study of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for human mesenchymal stem-cell-induced bone formation. Biomaterials. 2005;26(17):3631–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lee DH, Ryu KJ, Kim JW, Kang KC, Choi YR. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate and platelet-rich plasma enhanced bone healing in distraction osteogenesis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3789–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Latalski M, Elbatrawy YA, Thabet AM, Gregosiewicz A, Raganowicz T, Fatyga M. Enhancing bone healing during distraction osteogenesis with platelet-rich plasma. Injury. 2011;42(8):821–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Song SH, Kim SG, Kim SE, Song HR. Is DBM beneficial for the enhancement of bony consolidation in distraction osteogenesis? A randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/281738.

  10. 10.

    Chen H, Frankenburg EP, Goldstein SA, McCauley LK. Combination of local and systemic parathyroid hormone enhances bone regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Raschke MJ, Bail H, Windhagen HJ, Kolbeck SF, Weiler A, Raun K, et al. Recombinant growth hormone accelerates bone regenerate consolidation in distraction osteogenesis. Bone. 1999;24(2):81–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Im GI, Qureshi SA, Kenney J, Rubash HE, Shanbhag AS. Osteoblast proliferation and maturation by bisphosphonates. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4105–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Busse JW, Bhandari M, Kulkarni AV, Tunks E. The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on time to fracture healing: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2002;166(4):437–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Heybeli N, Yesildag A, Oyar O, Gulsoy UK, Tekinsoy MA, Mumcu EF. Diagnostic ultrasound treatment increases the bone fracture-healing rate in an internally fixed rat femoral osteotomy model. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(12):1357–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nolte PA, van der Krans A, Patka P, Janssen IM, Ryaby JP, Albers GH. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of nonunions. J Trauma. 2001;51(4):693–702; discussion 702-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tajali SB, Houghton P, MacDermid JC, Grewal R. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on fracture healing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 2012;91(4):349–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yang KH, Parvizi J, Wang SJ, Lewallen DG, Kinnick RR, Greenleaf JF, et al. Exposure to low-intensity ultrasound increases aggrecan gene expression in a rat femur fracture model. J Orthop Res. 1996;14(5):802–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shimazaki A, Inui K, Azuma Y, Nishimura N, Yamano Y. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone maturation in distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(7):1077–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tis JE, Meffert CR, Inoue N, McCarthy EF, Machen MS, McHale KA, et al. The effect of low intensity pulsed ultrasound applied to rabbit tibiae during the consolidation phase of distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(4):793–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Eberson CP, Hogan KA, Moore DC, Ehrlich MG. Effect of low-intensity ultrasound stimulation on consolidation of the regenerate zone in a rat model of distraction osteogenesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23(1):46–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mayr E, Laule A, Suger G, Ruter A, Claes L. Radiographic results of callus distraction aided by pulsed low-intensity ultrasound. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(6):407–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sakurakichi K, Tsuchiya H, Uehara K, Yamashiro T, Tomita K, Azuma Y. Effects of timing of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(2):395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chan CW, Qin L, Lee KM, Cheung WH, Cheng JC, Leung KS. Dose-dependent effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on callus formation during rapid distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(11):2072–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    El-Mowafi H, Mohsen M. The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on callus maturation in tibial distraction osteogenesis. Int Orthop. 2005;29(2):121–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dudda M, Hauser J, Muhr G, Esenwein SA. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound as a useful adjuvant during distraction osteogenesis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1376–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Salem KH, Schmelz A. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound shortens the treatment time in tibial distraction osteogenesis. Int Orthop. 2014;38(7):1477–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li R, Saleh M, Yang L, Coulton L. Radiographic classification of osteogenesis during bone distraction. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(3):339–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Duarte LR. The stimulation of bone growth by ultrasound. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1983;101(3):153–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bell JS, Thompson WA. Modified spot scanography. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther. 1950;63(6):915–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Griffin XL, Costello I, Costa ML. The role of low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy in the management of acute fractures: a systematic review. J Trauma. 2008;65(6):1446–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Khan Y, Laurencin CT. Fracture repair with ultrasound: clinical and cell-based evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 1):138–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kumagai K, Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Yamaguchi Y, Fujisawa T, Kuniya T, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates fracture healing by stimulation of recruitment of both local and circulating osteogenic progenitors. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(9):1516–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Malizos KN, Hantes ME, Protopappas V, Papachristos A. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: an overview. Injury. 2006;37(Suppl 1):S56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Reher P, Harris M, Whiteman M, Hai HK, Meghji S. Ultrasound stimulates nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 production by human osteoblasts. Bone. 2002;31(1):236–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Pilla AA, Mont MA, Nasser PR, Khan SA, Figueiredo M, Kaufman JJ, et al. Non-invasive low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone healing in the rabbit. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(3):246–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Claes L, Willie B. The enhancement of bone regeneration by ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93(1–3):384–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Choi IH, Chung CY, Cho TJ, Yoo WJ. Angiogenesis and mineralization during distraction osteogenesis. J Korean Med Sci. 2002;17(4):435–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Aronson J. Temporal and spatial increases in blood flow during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:124–31.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Simpson AH, Keenan G, Nayagam S, Atkins RM, Marsh D, Clement ND. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound does not influence bone healing by distraction osteogenesis: a multicentre double-blind randomised control trial. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4):494–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lou S, Lv H, Li Z, Tang P, Wang Y. Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tsumaki N, Kakiuchi M, Sasaki J, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates maturation of callus in patients treated with opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy by hemicallotasis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(11):2399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Ethics of approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by our institutional review board (Korea University Guro Hospital Institutional Review Board; IRB No. 2016GR0730; IRB-approved on November 16, 2016). The study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1983. The relevant ethics committee exempted this study from obtaining subjects’ informed consent after a waiver of informed consent was submitted with a specific explanation of the applicable reasons.

Funding

No benefits in any form have been or will be received form a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusion of this study is available upon request to the corresponding author.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Institute for Rare Diseases, Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, South Korea
    • Mi Hyun Song
    • , Tae-Jin Kim
    • , Sung Hyun Kang
    •  & Hae-Ryong Song
Authors
  1. Mi Hyun Song
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Tae-Jin Kim
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Sung Hyun Kang
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Hae-Ryong Song
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

MHS participated in study design, the analysis and interpretation of the data, and the drafting of the article and provided statistical expertise. TJK participated in the collection and assembly of the data. SHK participated in the collection and interpretation of the data. HRS participated in the study design and critical revisions of the manuscript and provided final approval of the article. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae-Ryong Song.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

MHS, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Institute for Rare Diseases, Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea; TJK, Resident, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Institute for Rare Diseases, Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea; SHK, Resident, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Institute for Rare Diseases, Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea; HRS, Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Institute for Rare Diseases, Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, M., Kim, T., Kang, S. et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound enhances callus consolidation in distraction osteogenesis of the tibia by the technique of lengthening over the nail procedure. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20, 108 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2490-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Distraction osteogenesis
  • Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound
  • Healing index
  • Callus maturation

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us