Skip to main content
Download PDF

Different associations between waist circumference and bone mineral density stratified by gender, age, and body mass index

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 23, Article number: 786 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Investigations of the relationship between waist circumference (WC) and bone mineral density (BMD) have inconsistent and incomprehensive results.

We explored the association between WC and BMD at various sites in a large-scale population-based study.

Methods

We screened 5337 participants from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites. The associations of WC with BMD were evaluated by weighted multivariable logistic regression models and conducted subgroup analyses for gender, age, and BMI. A weighted generalized additive model and a smooth curve fitting were performed to address non-linearity.

Results

Adjustments for all confounders, in males, WC was negatively correlated to BMD in different age and BMI groups (all the p < 0.05), except for in the lowest BMI group; in females, overall trends of relationships between WC and BMD were negative. However, statistical differences were insignificant in some cases. Additionally, every 1 cm increase in WC for individuals of all ages with normal BMI (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25) was associated with decrease in BMD at each skeletal site, as was the case for men with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. For women, the negative association of WC with BMD was evident at the lumbar spine in the youngest age group (8 ≤ Age ≤ 18) with normal BMI.

Conclusions

The nonlinear associations between WC and BMD at various skeletal sites are gender-, age- and BMI-specific in the NHANES (2006–2006).

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a metabolic and age-related skeletal disorder characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitectural deterioration, which increases bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture [1]. Along with the ageing social, the number of osteoporosis patients is rising, and osteoporosis-related fractures and secondary mortality are dramatically on the rise [1,2,3]. Unfortunately, the occurrence and progression of bone loss are usually silent, and patients have no symptoms until the first devastating fracture. Therefore, Therefore, it may be useful to explore simple anthtopometric risk factors for osteoporosis.

Accumulating epidemiological evidence has shown obesity is associated with.

osteoporosis. However, conclusions from different researcharches are conflicting. On the one hand, literature has reported that obesity, determined by body mass index (BMI), increases BMD and is protective against osteoporosis [4, 5]. In fact, however, almost half of all patients with osteoporosis-related fracturesture are overweight or obese [6]. On the other hand, body fat mass, especially abdominal fat mass, plays a detrimental role on BMD and the risk of fracture [7, 8]. One reason for this discrepancy might be the failure of BMI to serve as a sufficient biomarker of abdominal adiposity [9].

Waist circumference (WC) is suitable to assess abdominal adiposity and easy to standardize and clinically apply [10]. N evertheless, there few studies of the relations between WC and BMD are inconclusive [11]. The current study explores associations between WC and BMD at various skeletal sites in individuals stratified by age, gender, and BMI.

Methods

Study population

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is an extensive, ongoing cross-sectional survey conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). In detail, the NHANES database includes demographic, socioeconomic, dietary, and health-related data, examination components consisting of medical, dental, and physiological measurements, and laboratory tests administered by highly trained medical personnel. NHANES database can provide objective and overall data on health conditions for children and adults in the US, which is beneficial for researchers to develop sound public health policy and address emerging public health issues. All the data from the NHANES database were open and freely available for researchers throughout the world.

Our analysis was based on NHANES 2005–2006 data, a detailed flow chart was shown in Supplementary Fig. 1, and 5337 aged 8–69 years individuals were included in the final analysis ( dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was only administered to eligible participants aged 8–69 years in NHANES). Furthermore, individuals with age ≤ 18 are forbidden to smoke and drink in the united states, and physical activity is difficult to quantify. So data about smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity were unavailable in participants with less than or equal to 18.

Variables

Waist circumference was regarded as an exposure variable in this study. Detailed measurement methods for WC are shown on the NHANES website (https://www.n.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/2005-2006/manuals/BM.pdf). Data about smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity were extracted from the questionnaire. Subjects who smoked less than 100 cigarettes in life were considered as never smokers. Former smokers were defined as having smoked over 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and as having quit smoking [12]. Alcohol use was categorized as follows [13]: lifetime abstainers < 12 drinks in entire life; former drinkers ≥ 12 drinks in the past but none during the past 12 months; for women, moderate: ≤ 1 drink per day; heavy: > 1 drink per day; for men: moderate: ≤ 2 drinks per day; heavy: > 2 drinks per day. Additionally, physical activity levels were classified by responding to the question "average level of physical activity each day” into sedentary, low, moderate and rigorous groups, respectively.

Continuous covariates included age, poverty income ratio, height, weight, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total calcium, creatinine, fasting glucose, uric acid (UA), and parathyroid hormone. Race, smoking status, alcohol use, and physical activity were adjusted as categorical variables.

Outcomes

The outcomes of the present study are BMD at various skeletal sites, including total body BMD, total femur BMD, femoral neck BMD, intertrochanteric BMD, lumbar spine BMD, and lumbar pelvis BMD. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used in measurements of BMD, which is a widely accepted method of measuring BMD due to its speed, ease of use, and low radiation exposure. Importantly, the data of specific site BMD was from specific site DXA scans. Trained and certified radiology technologists performed the DXA examinations. Further details of the DXA examination protocol are documented in the Body Composition Procedures Manual on the NHANES website (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are reported as mean ± SD, and categorical variables are expressed as a number (percentage). All the statistical analysis in this study was conducted using package R version 3.4.3 (http://www.R-project.org) and EmpowerStats software (http://www.empowerstats.com). p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. The associations of WC with BMD at various skeletal sites were evaluated by weighted multivariable logistic regression models. Two models were conducted: model 1: none was adjusted. Model 2: age, race, poverty income ratio, height, ALP, total calcium, creatinine, fasting glucose, UA, and parathyroid hormone were adjusted in group 1. Model 2: age, race, poverty income ratio, height, smoking status, alcohol use, physical activity, ALP, total calcium, creatinine, fasting glucose, UA, and parathyroid hormone were adjusted in group 2 and group 3. Subgroup analyses stratified by gender, age and BMI were also conducted. A weighted generalized additive model and a smooth curve fitting were deployed to address non-linearity.

Results

Participant characteristics

The demographic characteristics of 5337 participants in this study were demonstrated in Table 1 classified based on gender and age. No matter in male or female, significant differences were found among three age groups in race, poverty income ratio, height, weight, WC, smoking status, alcohol use, physical activity, ALP, total calcium, creatinine, fasting glucose, UA, and parathyroid hormone (all the p < 0.001). Group 2 of both genders had the highest BMD compared with those in groups 1 and 3, except for BMD at the lumbar spine of men. In addition, for both males and females, BMI and WC increased in group 3 (p < 0.001).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of study participants
Full size table

Associations between WC and BMD were stratified by gender and age

The results of the multivariate regression analyses between WC and BMD categorized by gender and age were presented in Table 2. In males, WC was negatively correlated to BMD at various skeletal sites in different age groups after complete adjustments (all the p < 0.05). Moreover, compared with age group 2 and group 3, every 1 cm increase in WC resulted in the relatively most decrease in BMD at all skeletal sites in age group 1. Interestingly, the relationships between WC and BMD in females grouped by age were complicated. Firstly, significant inverse associations after adjusting for confounders were found at all skeletal sites apart from the lumbar pelvis in age group 1.

Table 2 Associations between waist circumference and BMD at various skeletal sites stratified by gender and age
Full size table

Furthermore, WC had relatively more importance on lumbar spine BMD in the age group 1 (β: -0.004, 95%CI: (-0.006, -0.002), p < 0.001). Secondly, in age group 2, WC was negatively related to total body BMD, total femur BMD, intertrochanteric BMD, and lumbar spine BMD, not femoral neck and pelvis BMD. Similarly, relatively more importance of WC on the lumbar spine was found (β: -0.003, 95%CI: (-0.005, -0.002), p < 0.001). Thirdly, WC was independently associated with total body BMD and femoral neck BMD in age group 3, not BMD at other sites.

Smooth curve fittings and generalized additive models were used to characterize.

the nonlinear relationship between WC and BMD at various sites in individuals classified by gender and age is shown in Fig. 1. In men, among age groups 1 and 3, the association between WC and BMD was an inverted J-shaped except for lumbar spine BMD; among age group 2, the association between WC and lumbar spine BMD was an inverted J-shaped curve. In women, among the lowest age group, inverted U-shaped curves were presented between WC and BMD at different sites; among age group 2, inverted U-shaped curves owner was shown between WC and pelvis BMD; diverse curve types were illustrated in the highest age group. Nevertheless, the overall trend of BMD appeared to be downward with WC increasing.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The association between WC and BMD stratified by gender and age. Group 1 (8 ≤ Age ≤ 18); Group 2 (18 < Age ≤ 50); Group 3(50 < Age ≤ 69). WC: waist circumference. BMD: body mineral density. ALP: alkaline phosphatase. UA: uric acid. Age, race, poverty income ratio, height, weight, ALP, total calcium, creatinine, fasting glucose, UA, and parathyroid hormone were adjusted in group 1. Further adjustments for smoking status, alcohol use, and physical activity were performed in group 2 and group 3

Full size image

Associations between WC and BMD stratified by gender and BMI

The relationships between BMI and BMD at different sites were shown in supplementary table 1. In males, BMI was positively related to BMD even after adjustments for confounders (p < 0.001), except for BMD at the lumbar spine (β: 0.007; 95%CI: (-0.002, 0.016)). Meanwhile, BMI had a predominant and positive effect on BMD at the total femur, femoral neck, and intertrochanter (all the adjusted p < 0.05) in females. There were not dramatic relations between BMI and BMD at total body, lumbar spine and pelvis after full adjustments (β: 0.002, 95%CI: (-0.006, 0.009); β: 0.001, 95%CI: (-0.009, 0.012); β: 0.005, 95%CI: (-0.006, 0.017), respectively).

The results of the multivariate regression analyses between WC and BMD categorized by gender and BMI were presented in Table 3. Both in men and women, WC was not significantly related to BMD at various sites in BMI group 1 after adjusting for confounders (p > 0.05). In men, inverse and obvious associations between BMI groups 2 and 3 were demonstrated between WC and BMD at diverse skeletal sites after adjustments (p < 0.001). In women, WC had dramatically negative effects on BMD apart from BMD at the femoral neck and pelvis in model 2 in BMI groups 2 and 3.

Table 3 Associations between waist circumference and BMD at various skeletal sites stratified by gender and BMI
Full size table

To detect nonlinear relationships between WC and BMD in subjects stratified by gender and BMI, Smooth curve fittings and generalized additive models were performed and related results were presented in Fig. 2. In males, WC had an inverted U-shaped relationship with BMD other than lumbar spine BMD in the lowest BMI group. In females, in the lowest BMI group, the associations between WC and total body BMD and pelvis BMD showed an inverted U-shaped curve; among BMI group 2, a light S-shaped association was presented between WC and total femur BMD and intertrochanter BMD; the association between WC and pelvis BMD was an inverted J-shaped curve in highest BMI group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The association between WC and BMD stratified by gender and BMI. Group 1 (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2); Group 2 (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2); Group 3 (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2). WC: waist circumference. BMD: body mineral density. BMI: body mass index. ALP: alkaline phosphatase. UA: uric acid. Age, race, poverty income ratio, height, weight, smoking status, alcohol use, physical activity, ALP, total calcium, creatinine, fasting glucose, UA, and, parathyroid hormone were adjusted

Full size image

The effect size of the association between WC and BMD according to gender, age, and BMI

To define the relative importance of WC on bone health, we compared regression coefficients between body WC and BMD in subjects stratified by gender, age, and BMI (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 2). In men, based on the independent relations, every 1 cm increase in WC of individuals with normal BMI bought a relatively more decrease in BMD at any site in any age group than subjects with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. In women, due to the number of subjects with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 in age group 1 being zero, the related data is lacking. Moreover, the greatest effect of WC on BMD was presented at the lumbar spine in the lowest age group with normal BMI (β: -0.0061, 95%CI:(-0.0089, -0.0033), p < 0.001).

Fig. 3
figure 3

A comparison of effect size in the correlations between WC and BMD at different skeletal sites according to gender, age, and BMI. WC: waist circumference. BMD: body mineral density. BMI: body mass index. ALP: alkaline phosphatase. UA: uric acid. Age, race, poverty income ratio, height, weight, smoking status, alcohol use, medical activity, ALP, total calcium, creatinine, fasting glucose, UA, and parathyroid hormone were adjusted. *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we explored the associations between waist circumference and BMD at various skeletal sites in subjects stratified by gender, age, and BMI. Our results indicated there were gender-, age- and BMI-specific relationships between WC and BMD. In males, waist circumference was significantly and inversely associated with BMD at all sites in all the age subgroups with normal BMI and overweight. WC is insignificantly related to BMD in subjects with low BMI in any age group at any site. Generally, WC has a negative effect on BMD in females. However, the differences were insignificant in some subgroups.

Several previous studies assessed the association between waist circumference as a metabolic syndrome component and BMD, but the results are inconsistent and uncomprehensive. A positive correlation between waist circumference and BMD was reported [14, 15]. Similarly, several studies found a negative correlation between WC and BMD [16, 17]. Furthermore, general population-based studies have found a significant negative correlation between BMD and waist circumference in postmenopausal females [18] and males [19]. The conflicting results may be attributed to the following factors. Different measuring methods were employed to evaluate BMD. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a widely accepted and used method of measuring BMD. However, the ultrasound pulse transmission method was performed in some researches. Additionally, the number of screened individuals was small in some studies, and different studies focused on diverse populations and BMD at various skeletal sites. Most investigations paid more attention to older men and postmenopausal women and overlooked the relationships between WC and BMD in middle-aged people and adolescents. Furthermore, femoral neck fracture, secondary to decrease in femoral neck BMD, poses a major medical burden [20]. Thus, the researchers related femoral neck BMD attract more attention. Importantly, controlled covariates were diverse in different studies. Three studies presenting a positive correlation between waist circumference and BMD didn’t adjust body weight or BMI [14, 21]. Meanwhile, a significantly positive association was shown in several investigations. However, the association was negative after adjusting for body weight or BMI. From the above analysis, body weight or BMI may affect the association between WC and BMD. As reported in previous and present studies, greater body weight or BMI is thought to increase bone density, which may be attributed to an adaptive response of skeletons to growing loading. When the mechanical loading effect of body weight or BMI is statistically eliminated, fat mass, especially abdominal fat, may be negatively associated with bone health. In the present study, we assessed the relationships between WC and BMD at the various skeletal site and conducted subgroup analyses for gender, age, and BMI based on data from ongoing and large NHANES databases. At the same time, we adjusted all the cofounders, including age, race, poverty income ratio, height, weight, smoking status, alcohol use, physical activity, ALP, total calcium, creatinine, fasting glucose, UA, and parathyroid hormone, to present the real associations between WC and BMD. Fortunately, our study may be a contribution to filling the gap on this subject.

Different patterns of nonlinearity between WC and BMD were observed in different age groups in this study. This may be attributed to following several causes.

On the one hand, it is well known that bone metabolism dramatically changes with the growing of age. on the other hand, increased age can bring about changes of bone geometry, which is mainly manifested as bone expansion [22]. Furthermore, aging is associated with gradual changes in body composition, typically characterised by decreases in appendicular lean mass and increases in central fat mass [23, 24].

A cross-sectional study has shown total estradiol and free estradiol, but not testosterone levels were significantly correlated with BMD in males after various adjustments [21]; that is, estradiol may be a protective factor against bone loss, and variations in estradiol may have obvious effects on bone health. Additionally, testosterone predominates in males, and estrogen predominates in females. Therefore, sex hormones may play a more important role in females than in males, and adjustment for estrogen levels may be necessary for BMD-related studies, especially in females. In the present investigation, WC is significantly related to BMD at various sites in all age groups with normal BMI and overweight in males. However, the situation for females is a little more complicated. This may be because variations in estradiol are obvious among different age groups and attenuate the effects of WC on BMD.

An essential limitation of the present study is a cross-sectional design. The design allows only a cross-sectional observation of the associations of WC with BMD, so we fail to assess the effects of dynamic change of WC on BMD. Secondly, estradiol and variations in estradiol aren’t adjusted in statistical analysis. Further investigation should examine the link between WC and BMD under estradiol-adjusted conditions. Similarly, due to the unavailable exact age of menopause in the NHANES, the inclusion of this variable is lack in the study. Finally, data on overall diet quality and calcium intake are not available in this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the website of the NHANES: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/index.htm.

References

  1. Sambrook P, Cooper C. Osteoporosis. The Lancet. 2006;367:2010–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Center JR. Fracture Burden: what two and a half decades of dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study data reveal about clinical outcomes of osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15:88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bliuc D, Alarkawi D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR. Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density: the dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:637–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lloyd JT, Alley DE, Hawkes WG, Hochberg MC, Waldstein SR, Orwig DL. Body mass index is positively associated with bone mineral density in US older adults. Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM. Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal womenresults from the national osteoporosis risk assessment. JAMA. 2001;286:2815–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielson CM, Marshall LM, Adams AL, LeBlanc ES, Cawthon PM, Ensrud K, Stefanick ML, Barrett-Connor E. Orwoll ES and for the osteoporotic fractures in men study research G. BMI and fracture risk in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS). J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:496–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim YM, Kim SH, Kim S, Yoo JS, Choe EY, Won YJ. Variations in fat mass contribution to bone mineral density by gender, age, and body mass index: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2008–2011. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:2543–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu X, Ma X, Lu H, He W, Wang Z, Zhu S. Associations of fat mass and fat distribution with bone mineral density in pre- and postmenopausal Chinese women. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:113–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller MJ. From BMI to functional body composition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:1119–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross R, Neeland IJ, Yamashita S, Shai I, Seidell J, Magni P, Santos RD, Arsenault B, Cuevas A, Hu FB, Griffin BA, Zambon A, Barter P, Fruchart JC, Eckel RH, Matsuzawa Y, Despres JP. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus statement from the IAS and ICCR working group on visceral obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16:177–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen L, Liang J, Wen J, Huang H, Li L, Lin W, Zong L, Wang N, Cai L, Tang K, Chen H, Li M, Lin L, Lu J, Bi Y, Wang W, Chen G. Is waist circumference a negative predictor of calcaneal bone mineral density in adult Chinese men with normal weight? Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore JX, Bevel MS, Aslibekyan S, Akinyemiju T. Temporal changes in allostatic load patterns by age, race/ethnicity, and gender among the US adult population; 1988–2018. Prev Med. 2021;147:106483.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Agrawal P, Mercer A, Hassanali J, Carmack C, Doss D, Murillo R. Gender differences in the association between alcohol use and sedentary behavior among adults. Am J Health Promot. 2018;32:1576–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. von Muhlen D, Safii S, Jassal SK, Svartberg J, Barrett-Connor E. Associations between the metabolic syndrome and bone health in older men and women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:1337–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hernández JL, Olmos JM, Pariente E, Martínez J, Valero C, García-Velasco P, Nan D, Llorca J, González-Macías J. Metabolic syndrome and bone metabolism: the Camargo Cohort Study. Menopause. 2010;17(3):955–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim HY, Choe JW, Kim HK, Bae SJ, Kim BJ, Lee SH, Koh J-M, Han KO, Park HM, Kim GS. Negative association between metabolic syndrome and bone mineral density in Koreans Especially in Men. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010;86:350–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim K-C, Shin D-H, Lee S-Y, Im J-A, Lee D-C. Relation between obesity and bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in Korean postmenopausal women. Yonsei Med J. 2010;51:857–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoo HJ, Park MS, Yang SJ, Kim TN, Lim KI, Kang HJ, Song W, Baik SH, Choi DS, Choi KM. The differential relationship between fat mass and bone mineral density by gender and menopausal status. J Bone Miner Metab. 2012;30:47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim T, Park S, Pak Y-S, Lee S, Lee E-H. Association between metabolic syndrome and bone mineral density in Korea: the Fourth Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES IV), 2008. J Bone Miner Metab. 2013;31:652–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen C, Chen Q, Nie B, Zhang H, Zhai H, Zhao L, Xia P, Lu Y, Wang N. Trends in bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and osteopenia among U.S. adults with prediabetes, 2005–2014. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:1008–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Araujo AB, Travison TG, Leder BZ, McKinlay JB. Correlations between serum testosterone, estradiol, and sex hormone-binding globulin and bone mineral density in a diverse sample of men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:2135–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo Y. Bone mineral density averaged over a region of interest on femur is affected by age-related change of bone geometry. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29:1419–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao Z, Tan Z, Shang J, Cheng Y, Tang Y, Guo B, Gong J, Xu H. Sex-specific and age-specific characteristics of body composition and its effect on bone mineral density in adults in southern China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e032268–e032268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo B, Wu Q, Gong J, Xiao Z, Tang Y, Shang J, Cheng Y, Xu H. Relationships between the lean mass index and bone mass and reference values of muscular status in healthy Chinese children and adolescents. J Bone Miner Metab. 2016;34:703–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciated the permission for use of the data of the NHANES database.

Funding

The study was supported by Doctoral Research Foundation of Dalian University 2021QL26 to Zhiqiang Yin. 

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China

    Zhiqiang Yin & Yupeng Liu

  2. Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China

    Haihong Yan

  3. Administration Office, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China

    Yin Yu

Authors
  1. Zhiqiang Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haihong Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yin Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yupeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yupeng Liu made substantial contributions to conception and the design of the study. Zhiqiang Yin participated in the study design, analyzed the data and, drafted the manuscript. Haihong Yan participated in the collection and analysis of data. Yin Yu revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yupeng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were followed by the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics NHANES. All participants gave their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1.

Study flow chart.

Additional file 2: Table1.

The associations between BMI and BMD stratified by age and gender.

Additional file 3: Table 2.

Associationsbetween waist circumference and BMD at various skeletal sites stratified by gender,age and BMI.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, Z., Yan, H., Yu, Y. et al. Different associations between waist circumference and bone mineral density stratified by gender, age, and body mass index. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 786 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05736-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05736-5

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us