Skip to main content
Download PDF

Risk factors associated with cervical spine lesions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 22, Article number: 408 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Few reports have described the association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cervical lesions and osteoporosis, especially in patients with vertical subluxation (VS) that could be induced by the collapse of lateral masses in the upper cervical spine. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for cervical lesions in patients with RA under current pharmacological treatments with biological agents, and to investigate the relationship between osteoporosis and VS development.

Methods

One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients with RA who underwent both cervical plain radiography and bone mineral density (BMD) scanning were enrolled. RA cervical lesions included atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS), VS, and subaxial subluxation (SAS). We assigned patients with AAS, VS, or SAS to the cervical-lesion group, and all other patients to the non-cervical-lesion group. Radiological findings, BMD, and clinical data on RA were collected. We used multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the risk factors for cervical lesions in patients with RA.

Results

The cervical-lesion and non-cervical-lesion groups included 106 and 79 patients, respectively. There were 79 patients with AAS, 31 with VS, and 41 with SAS. The cervical-lesion group had a younger age of RA onset, longer RA disease duration, higher RA stage, and lower femoral neck BMD than the non-cervical-lesion group. Multivariate analyses showed that the risk factors for RA cervical lesions were prednisolone usage, biological agent usage, and higher RA stage. Prednisolone usage and femoral neck BMD were the risk factors for VS.

Conclusions

Cervical lesions were confirmed in 57 % of the patients. Prednisolone usage, biological agent usage, and higher RA stage were significant risk factors for cervical lesions in patients with RA. The general status of osteoporosis might contribute to the development of VS.

Peer Review reports

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a type of autoimmune arthritis that causes chronic inflammatory synovitis. RA lesions also invade the spine, and cervical lesions are particularly common in RA, which results in several characteristic deformities [1]. These deformities include atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS), vertical subluxation (VS), and subaxial subluxation (SAS). They possibly lead to cervical instabilities that may cause neurologic damage and induce a fatal status due to compression of the spinal cord or brain stem [2].

The treatment of RA has changed dramatically due to recent developments in biological agents. The available biological agents are the proinflammatory cytokine therapies, such as infliximab, which act by inhibiting the expression of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα). These drugs are effective in blocking disease activities and joint degradation [3]. The incidence of cervical spine instability is 32–42 %, which may be decreasing because of stable disease control due to the usage of biological agents [4, 5] Unfortunately, the incidence of cervical instability in patients with RA is still greater than 30 %, which represents a major health issue.

There have been several reports on RA cervical lesions [4,5,6,7,8,9]. However, few reports have described the association between RA cervical lesions and osteoporosis, especially in patients with VS that could be induced by the collapse of lateral masses in the upper cervical spine [10, 11]. Therefore, osteoporosis could affect the progression of VS; however, the association between osteoporosis and VS development remains uncertain.

The purpose of our study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for cervical lesions in patients with RA under current pharmacologic treatment after the approval of biological agents, and to investigate the relationship between osteoporosis and VS development.

Methods

Study design and population

Between 2008 and 2016, a total of 317 patients with RA who underwent cervical plain radiography were reviewed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for cervical lesions in patients with RA under current pharmacological treatments with biological agents, and to investigate the relationship between osteoporosis and VS development. Seventeen patients who had a history of cervical surgery were excluded. Finally, 185 patients who underwent both cervical plain radiography and bone mineral density (BMD) scans were included in this study. All patients fulfilled the American Rheumatism Association RA criteria [12]. All study participants provided informed consent, and the study design was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee for Clinical Research at Yokohama City University Medical Center.

Data collection

Radiological findings and BMD data were collected from the electronic medical records. Radiography was measured when the patients complained of neck pain and/or neurological abnormalities. Clinical data on RA were also obtained and included age at RA onset and RA disease duration; data on current medications, including the use of prednisolone, methotrexate (MTX), and biological agents; and previous joint surgery for RA. Additionally, the C-reactive protein level, rheumatoid factor (RF), matrix metalloproteinase-3 level, and the Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) were reviewed.

The BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured using Hologic Horizon A dual X-ray bone densitometry (Hologic, Marlborough, MA, USA). The BMD is described as a young adult mean score. We divided the patients into two groups based on the results of their radiographic evaluation of the cervical spine: the cervical-lesion group included patients with AAS, VS, or SAS, and the non-cervical-lesion group included patients with no cervical lesions. In the cervical-lesion group, we subdivided the patients into two subgroups: the VS group that included patients with VS, and the non-VS group that included patients with no VS.

Treatment regimen

Patients with RA received intensive therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: methotrexate (< 16 mg/week), salazosulfapyridine (< 1.0 g/d), D-penicillamine (< 600 mg/d), and bucillamine (< 300 mg/d). Oral corticosteroids (< 20 mg/d) were also administered to relieve RA symptoms. In more severe cases, tacrolimus hydrate (< 3 mg/day), leflunomide (20 mg/day), tofacitinib citrate (10 mg/day), or biologic agents such as abatacept (500–750 mg/4 weeks), etanercept (10–25 mg/2 weeks or 25–50 mg/week), infliximab (3 mg/kg/8 weeks), tocilizumab (8 mg/kg/4 weeks), certolizumab pegol (400 mg/4 weeks), adalimumab (40 mg/2 weeks), and golimumab (50 mg/4 weeks with MTX or 100 mg/4 weeks) were administered.

Radiographic evaluation

Lateral cervical radiographs were obtained with patients in the neutral, extension, and flexion positions using the standardized protocol (exposure time, 80 msec; distance, 150 cm; current, 250 mA; voltage, 72 kV). We measured the atlantodental interval, Ranawat value, and subluxation. AAS was defined as an atlantodental interval > 3 mm [13], VS was defined as a Ranawat value < 13 mm [14], and SAS was defined as vertebral translation > 2 mm without osteophyte formation [15].

Unilateral or bilateral hand radiographs were used to classify the severity of peripheral joint destruction based on the Steinbrocker classifications (I–IV) [16]. The radiographs were evaluated by three spine surgeons.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges. Statistical comparisons between the groups were performed using the Student t-test, Mann−Whitney U test, chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors of cervical lesions. Variables eligible for inclusion in the multivariable analysis had P-values < 0.20 in the univariable analyses and were clinically and biologically plausible. To evaluate the risk factors for RA patients with high disease activity, multivariate analyses were performed for patients with RA stages III or IV separately. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP 12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Intraclass correlation coefficients of the intraobserver reliabilities for the parametric atlantodental interval, Renawat value and vertebral translation were 0.92, 0.81, and 0.89, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients of the interobserver reliabilities were 0.94, 0.87, and 0.93, respectively. Theκcoefficients of the intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities for the non-parametric RA stage were 0.74 and 0.71, respectively. All the values indicated good reproducibility.

Results

The enrolled patients included 12 men and 173 women with a median age of 68 years. The median age at RA onset was 52 years, and the median RA disease duration was 11 years. There were 106 (57 %) patients in the cervical-lesion group and 79 (43 %) patients in the non-cervical-lesion group. There were 78 patients with AAS, 42 with SAS, and 31 with VS. The patients were administered the following biological agents: abatacept (n = 17), etanercept (n = 12), infliximab (n = 10), tocilizumab (n = 8), certolizumab pegol (n = 5), adalimumab (n = 3), and golimumab (n = 1) (Table 1).

Table 1 Patient demographics and clinical parameters
Full size table

In the univariate analysis comparing the cervical-lesion and non-cervical-lesion groups, the age at RA onset and BMD of the femoral neck was significantly lower in the cervical-lesion group than in the non-cervical-lesion group. The RA disease duration, ratio of RA stage III or IV, and previous joint surgery was significantly higher in the cervical-lesion group than in the non-cervical-lesion group. The usage ratios of prednisolone and biological agents were significantly higher in the cervical-lesion group than in the non-cervical-lesion group (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison between the cervical and non-cervical lesion groups (univariate analysis)
Full size table

Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the ratio of RA stage III or IV and the usage of prednisolone and biological agents were significant risk factors of cervical lesions in patients with RA (Table 3). In the univariate analysis comparing the VS and non-VS groups, the age at RA onset, RA duration, ratio of RA stage III or IV, usage of prednisolone, BMD of the femoral neck, and previous joint surgery were significantly different between the groups (Table 4). Multiple logistic regression analysis of VS development showed that usage of prednisolone and BMD of the femoral neck were significant risk factors (Table 5). In RA stage III or IV patients with high disease activity, the usage of prednisolone and BMD of the femoral neck were also significant risk factors for VS development (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 3 Multivariate analysis of risk factors for cervical lesions
Full size table
Table 4 Comparison between the VS and non-VS groups (univariate analysis)
Full size table
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of the risk factors for VS development
Full size table
Table 6 Comparison between VS and non-VS groups of RA stage III or IV patients (univariate analysis)
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, the prevalence of patients with cervical lesions was 57 %. The ratio of RA stage III or IV and the usage of prednisolone and biological agents were identified as risk factors for cervical lesions.

The cervical spine is frequently involved in patients with RA, and neural impairment is a consequent complication. Irreversible spinal cord damage, difficulty with ambulation, respiratory dysfunction, and even sudden death may occur [2]. Once neurological deficits occur, neural impairment becomes progressive [17], and even surgical treatment cannot prevent neurological deterioration [18]. Therefore, RA cervical lesions remain a major health concern. Several studies have reported the risk factors of cervical lesions in patients with RA [6,7,8]. However, it has not been well investigated after the use of biological agents became more popular.

The registration of biological agents has changed the standard of care for patients with RA. The available biological agents are anti-proinflammatory cytokine therapies, such as TNFα blockers and a T-cell activation inhibitor [3].

Terashima et al.. have reported that mutilating changes at baseline, corticosteroid administration, and previous joint surgery are predictors of severe aggravation of cervical spine instabilities in RA [8]. Kaito et al.. have also reported that the disease duration and Steinbrocker stage are identified as independent risk factors for the incidence of cervical lesions [5]. Yurube et al.. identified that corticosteroid administration, Steinbrocker stage III or IV, mutilating changes at baseline, and the development of arthritis mulilans correlated with the progression to severe instability. Progressive development to mutilating changes and concomitant corticosteroid treatment are indicators for poor prognosis of the cervical spine in RA [19, 20]. In this study, the multivariate analysis showed that the ratio of RA stage III or IV and the usage of prednisolone and biological agents were risk factors for cervical lesions. Although biological agents may prevent the onset of cervical lesions, pre-existing cervical lesions cannot be reversed [9]. Patients with RA requiring cervical spine surgery tend to have higher disease activity, and in these patients, the incidence of cervical spine surgery remained unchanged despite treatment with biologic agents [21].

Several studies have shown that the prevalence of cervical lesions in patients with RA ranged from 32 to 57 % [4,5,6,7,8]. Fujiwara et al.. prospectively examined 173 patients to clarify the development and progression of cervical spinal involvement in RA. The incidences of cervical lesions were 43 % at 12.3 years of RA and 57 % at 16.5 years of RA. As follow-up proceeded, more cases of cervical lesions became apparent, indicating that cervical lesions are progressive [6]. In Japan, biological agents were approved in 2003. This might have had an influence on stabilizing RA cervical lesions. In fact, Takahashi et al.. have reported that 42 % of 220 patients from 2010 to 2011 had cervical spine instability. The prevalence has decreased since the approval of biological agents. However, there were no effects of MTX and biological agents on cervical instability [4]. Morita et al.. compared the 1999 and 2015 surveys and reported that the incidences decreased by 50 % for AAS and 75 % for VS by modern therapeutic strategies [22]. Kaito et al.. have reported that the incidence of patients with RA onset after 2000 with any cervical lesions was 31.8 %. Biological agents effectively prevented the emergence of new cervical lesions; however, they could not prevent the progression of pre-existing cervical lesions [5, 9].

Our study indicated that the prevalence of patients with cervical lesions was 57 %. There were 78 patients with AAS, 42 with SAS, and 31 with VS. This prevalence is higher than that in recent studies in this era of biological agents [4, 5]. This might have been due to the mean RA disease duration in our study, which was 14.3 years compared to the 8.5 and 11.1 years reported in previous studies [4, 5]. Additionally, a large proportion of patients with more advanced diseases might have been treated with biological agents.

Few reports have described the association between RA cervical lesions and osteoporosis. Neva et al.. have reported that the severity of atlantoaxial disorders positively correlated with the grade of destruction in evaluated joints. Furthermore, patients with atlantoaxial disorders presented with decreased BMD of the femoral neck [10]. Han et al.. observed that osteoporosis is an independent predictive factor for higher AAS occurrence in patients with a lower body mass index (BMI). The effect of a lower BMD, which is related to higher disease activity and peripheral bone erosions, on increased atlantodental interval and higher AAS development, may be synergistic in patients with RA with a lower BMI. Osteoporotic conditions may lead to atlantoaxial ligament laxity. These conditions may be aggravated in RA patients with a lower BMI [23].

VS usually occurs after AAS. VS is considered to be a serious condition in patients with RA as it can be associated with a poor survival rate and sudden death [2]. Dokai et al.. hypothesized that osteoporosis could affect the progression of VS. Their results indicated that VS could be induced by collapse of the lateral masses in the upper cervical spine. The risk factors for VS development were age, RA symptom duration, and BMD (lumbar). However, they could not show a statistically significant relationship between osteoporosis and VS development [11]. In our study, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the usage of prednisolone and BMD of the femoral neck were significant risk factors of development of VS. However, the difference in BMD of the lumbar spine did not show any statistical significance. This discrepancy might be due to osteophytes and endplate erosions that have been described to affect the measurement of BMD at the lumbar spine [10, 24]. Nevertheless, our results indicated that the general status of osteoporosis could contribute to the development of VS. Osteoporosis may affect the complex upper cervical structure of the bones and ligaments. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Thus, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

An appropriate treatment for BMD deficiency may prevent the development of VS. Tanaka et al.. have reported that denosumab could prevent the progression of bone erosion in the early stage of RA and play a useful role in anti-osteoporotic therapy. However, denosumab has no effect on joint inflammation or cartilage destruction in RA [25]. The complex osteoimmunological network in patients with RA suggests that the powerful anti-inflammatory activity of biological agents beyond the control of the disease is likely to reduce osteoporosis and fracture risk [26]. Therefore, a combination of biological agents and denosumab may be effective in preventing VS. Further studies are required to establish these treatments.

There are several limitations to this study. First, in this cross-sectional study, we reviewed patients with varying degrees of spinal instability, and we did not consider the duration of RA treatment and medication dosages. This might have led to a selection bias, which might have resulted in the use of biological agents being identified as a risk factor for RA cervical lesions. Second, we did not assess the data on clinical and neurological symptoms. Only patients with RA who complained of symptoms of cervical lesions were included in this study. It is possible that only more frail patients underwent a bone scan, as opposed to all patients with RA, to limit selection bias towards patients with lower BMD. Third, this was a cross-sectional study; consequently, disease activity was only reflected over a certain period. A longitudinal evaluation was not performed. Fourth, we did not perform a power analysis for the sample size. We chose the young adult mean as a variable in the osteoporosis index instead of BMD, as we were unable to find a suitable previous study that had compared RA cervical lesions and BMD.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the prevalence of patients with cervical lesions was 57 %. The incidence of RA remains a major health issue.

Age at RA onset and BMD of the femoral neck were significantly lower in the cervical-lesion group than in the non-cervical-lesion group. The RA disease duration, higher RA stage, and previous joint surgery were significantly higher in the cervical-lesion group than in the non-cervical-lesion group. A higher RA stage and the usage of prednisolone and biological agents were significant risk factors for cervical lesions in patients with RA. The usage of prednisolone and BMD of the femoral neck were risk factors for VS development. Finally, the general status of osteoporosis could contribute to the development of VS.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AAS:

Atlantoaxial subluxation

BMD:

Bone mineral density

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

SAS:

Subaxial subluxation

TNFα:

Tumor necrosis factor α

VS:

Vertical subluxation

References

  1. Yonenobu K, Oda T. Management of cervical spinal lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2004;14:113–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paus AC, Steen H, Røislien J, Mowinckel P, Teigland J. High mortality in rheumatoid arthritis with subluxation of the cervical spine. Spine. 2008;33:2278–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Confavreux CB, Chapurlat RD. Systemic bone effects of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:1023–36.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Takahashi S, Suzuki A, Koike T, Yamada K, Yasuda H, Tada M, et al. Current prevalence and characteristics of cervical spine instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologics. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24:904–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaito T, Ohshima S, Fujiwara H, Makino T, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H. Incidence and risk factors for cervical lesions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under the current pharmacologic treatment paradigm. Mod Rheumatol. 2017;27:593–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujiwara K, Owaki H, Fujimoto M, Yonenobu K, Ochi T. A long-term follow-up of cervical lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:519–26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yurube T, Sumi M, Nishida K, Takabatake M, Kohyama K, Matsubara T, et al. Progression of cervical spine instabilities in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine. 2011;36:647–53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Terashima Y, Yurube T, Hirata H, Sugiyama D, Sumi M. Predictive risk factors of cervical spine instabilities in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine. 2017;42:556–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaito T, Ohshima S, Fujiwara H, Makino T, Yonenobu K. Predictors for the progression of cervical lesion in rheumatoid arthritis under the treatment of biological agents. Spine. 2013;38:2258–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neva MH, Kotaniemi A, Kaarela K, Lehtinen JT, Belt EA, Kauppi M. Atlantoaxial disorders in rheumatoid arthritis associate with the destruction of peripheral and shoulder joints, and decreased bone mineral density. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003;21:179–84.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dokai T, Nagashima H, Okano T, Nanjo Y, Kishimoto Y, Tanida A, et al. Morphological and volumetric analysis of the development of atlantoaxial vertical subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis. Yonago Acta Med. 2013;5621–27.

  12. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315–24.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sharp J, Purser DW, Lawrence JS. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine in the adult. Ann Rheum Dis. 1958;17:303–13.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ranawat CS, O’Leary PA, Pellicci PA, Tsairis PE, Marchisello PE, Dorr LA. Cervical spine fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:1003–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mańczak M, Gasik R. Subaxial Lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine. 1995;20:208–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steinbrocker O, Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Med Assoc. 1949;140:659–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sunahara N, Matsunaga S, Mori T, Ijiri K, Sakou T. Clinical course of conservatively managed rheumatoid arthritis patients with myelopathy. Spine. 1997;22:26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boden SD, Dodge LD, Bohlman HH, Rechtine GR. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. A long-term analysis with predictors of paralysis and recovery. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75;1282–97.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yurube T, Sumi M, Nishida K, Miyamoto H, Miyamoto H, Kohyama K, Matsubara T, et al. Incidence and aggravation of cervical spine instabilities in Rheumatoid arthritis. Spine. 2012;37:2136–2144.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yurube T, Sumi M, Nishida K, Miyamoto H, Miyamoto H, Kohyama K, Matsubara T, et al. Accelerated development of cervical spine instabilities in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a prospective minimum 5-year Cohort study. PLOS One. 2014;9:e88970.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sugita S, Chikuda H, Kadono Y, Ohtsu H, Takeshita K, Nishino J, et al. Clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing cervical spine surgery: an analysis of national data base of rheumatic diseases in Japan. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:203.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morita O, Miura K, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Hanyu T, Netsu T, et al. Changes in the incidence of cervical lesions owing to the development of rheumatoid arthritis treatment and the impact of cervical lesions on patients’ quality of life. Modern Rheumatol. 2020;30:495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Han M, Ryu J, Kim C, Kim JM, Cheong JH, Bak KH, et al. Influence of systemic bone mineral density on atlantoaxial subluxation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporosis Int. 2017;28:1931–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Von der Recke P, Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Christiansen C. The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction. Osteoporos Int. 1996;6:43–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tanaka S, Tanaka Y, Ishiguro N, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi T. RANKL: A therapeutic target for bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Modern Rheumatol. 2018;28:9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Munno OD, Ferro F. The effect of biologic agents on bone homeostasis in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019;37:502–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune- cho, Minami-ku, 232-0024, Yokohama, Japan

    Yosuke Uchino, Takayuki Higashi, Naomi Kobayashi & Tetsuhiko Inoue

  2. Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, 232-0024, Yokohama, Japan

    Yuichi Mochida

  3. Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, 236-0004, Yokohama, Japan

    Yutaka Inaba

Authors
  1. Yosuke Uchino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takayuki Higashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naomi Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tetsuhiko Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuichi Mochida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yutaka Inaba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YU, TI, and TH were involved in the study design and interpretation of the data. All authors critically revised the report, commented on draft of the manuscript, and approved the final report.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Kobayashi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee for Clinical Research at Yokohama City University Medical Center (D1401017). All study participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uchino, Y., Higashi, T., Kobayashi, N. et al. Risk factors associated with cervical spine lesions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 408 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04285-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04285-7

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us