Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Exercise-induced pain changes associate with changes in muscle perfusion in knee osteoarthritis: exploratory outcome analyses of a randomised controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 20, Article number: 491 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Exercise therapy is recommended for knee osteoarthritis (OA), but the underlying mechanisms of pain relief are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of exercise on muscle perfusion assessed by dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and its association with changes in pain in patients with knee OA.

Methods

Exploratory outcome analyses of a randomised controlled study with per-protocol analyses (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01545258) performed at an outpatient clinic at a public hospital in Denmark. We compared 12 weeks of supervised exercise therapy 3 times per week (ET) with a no attention control group (CG). Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess group mean differences in changes from baseline to week 12 in knee muscle perfusion quantified by DCE-MRI, patient-reported pain and function using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire, knee extensor and flexor muscle strength tests, and the six-minute walking test (6MWT). Spearman’s correlation coefficients were used to determine the correlation between changes in DCE-MRI variables, KOOS, muscle strength, and 6MWT. The potential effect mediation of the DCE-MRI perfusion variables was investigated in a post-hoc mediation analysis.

Results

Of 60 participants randomised with knee osteoarthritis, 33 (ET, n = 16, CG, n = 17) adhered to the protocol and had complete DCE-MRI data. At follow-up, there were significant group differences in muscle perfusion changes and clinically relevant group differences in KOOS pain changes (10.7, 95% CI 3.3 to 18.1, P = 0.006) in favor of ET. There were no significant between-group differences on muscle strength and function. The changes in pain and muscle perfusion were significantly correlated (highest Spearman’s rho = 0.42, P = 0.014). The mediation analyses were generally not statistically significant.

Conclusion

The pain-reducing effects of a 12-week exercise program are associated with changes in knee muscle perfusion quantified by DCE-MRI in individuals with knee OA, but whether the effects are mediated by muscle perfusion changes remains unclear.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01545258, first posted March 6, 2012.

Peer Review reports

Background

Exercise therapy is recommended as first line treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) based on extensive research evidence on beneficial effects of exercise on pain and function [1,2,3,4]. However further investigations of the underlying mechanisms of exercise are needed in order to substantiate a possible mode of action.

The beneficial effects of exercise on knee OA pain and function may be caused by increased muscle strength, increased knee range of motion, or improvements in proprioception [5, 6]. Also, a reduction of pressure-pain sensitivity in parallel with pain reduction has indicated alterations in pain processing as a mechanism of exercise [7]. The measurement instruments for these outcomes, however, are either performance-based or assessor-dependent, which lowers the objectivity of the measure and increases the risk of bias [8]. Objective measurements of local physiological changes are needed in order to understand the mode of action behind the symptomatic relief caused by exercise therapy in knee OA.

Muscles are the primary tissue affected by most exercise types; thus, any physiological changes caused by exercise are expected to be reflected in the muscles. Indeed, exercise causes physiological changes in the muscles, such as increased capillarisation or angiogenesis [9,10,11]. We have recently shown that more widespread muscle perfusion in the peri-articular knee muscles was associated with less pain in patients with knee OA [12]. However, no conclusions on causality between exercise-induced changes in muscle perfusion and decreased knee OA pain can be drawn based on this cross-sectional material; the association must be tested prospectively.

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) is a method to quantify tissue perfusion through temporal variations of the MRI signal intensity following intravenous injection of a contrast agent [13]. Such quantification of localized perfusion of synovium reflects the histological degree of inflammation of the synovium in both rheumatoid arthritis and end-stage knee OA [14, 15]. Furthermore, in knee OA, increased perfusion of the infrapatellar fat pad and synovium is associated with higher pain scores [16,17,18]. DCE-MRI derived perfusion is a sensitive method to assess skeletal muscle perfusion [19].

The purposes of this study were to explore 1) the effects of a 12-week therapeutic exercise program on muscle perfusion in the peri-articular knee muscles assessed by DCE-MRI and 2) the association between changes in muscle perfusion and changes in pain, physical function and performance in patients with knee OA. We hypothesized that exercise would increase muscle perfusion in parallel with improved pain, physical function and performance when compared with a no-attention control intervention.

Methods

Study design

This is an exploratory sub-study of a previously published randomised controlled parallel-group-trial investigating the effects of a 12-week exercise program on the pain sensitivity in patients with knee OA focusing on the per-protocol population [7] performed at an outpatient’s clinic at a public hospital in Denmark (2012–2013). The study was approved by the Regional Health Research Ethics Committee of The Capital Region of Denmark (H-2-2011-159) and registered prior to commencement of the trial (www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01545258).

Participants

A comprehensive description of the recruitment process and inclusion/exclusion criteria is published elsewhere [7]. Briefly, eligibility criteria included age ≥ 40 years, a clinical diagnosis of knee OA confirmed by radiography assessed by an experienced radiologist, and a body mass index between 20 and 35 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria included participation in exercise therapy within the previous 3 months, having inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and lower extremity joint replacement.

Sample size, randomisation and blinding

The sample size of the main trial was based on group differences in the primary outcome, pressure-pain threshold, and was calculated to 60 participants [7].

After baseline assessments, participants were randomly assigned (1:1 stratified by gender) to exercise therapy (ET) or to a control group (CG). A computer-generated list of random numbers was used and concealed from the researchers enrolling and assessing participants. Participants were aware of their group allocation; outcome assessors and data analysts were kept blinded to the allocation [7].

Interventions

The ET group was offered facility-based, functional and individualised exercise therapy supervised by a trained physiotherapist 3 times weekly for 12 weeks. A full description of the.

exercise program is available in [7] and in the Additional file 1. Attendance at minimum 24/36 sessions was defined as protocol adherence. The CG received no attention during the 12 weeks and was requested not to engage in therapeutic exercise during study participation.

MRI protocol

MRI of the most symptomatic knee at baseline was performed on a 3 T Siemens Verio® (3 T Magnetom Verio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) system using a 15-channel dedicated send/receive coil. In addition to a standard clinical MRI protocol, a sagittal DCE T1 VIBE sequence was performed with a temporal resolution of 9 s and 30 repetitions. During the third repetition an intravenous injection of 0.1 ml/kg body weight Gadolinium (Gd) contrast agent (Prohance®, Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Italy) was administered (2 ml/s). The total scanning time was 30 min with the DCE-MRI sequence performed after 20 min. The full MRI protocol is available in the Additional file 1.

Image analysis

The investigator analysing the DCE-MRI images (EB) was blinded to group allocation and clinical data and supervised by experienced radiologists (MB and RR). Dedicated software (Dynamika® version 4.2.2., Image Analysis Ltd., London, UK) was used for all DCE-MRI analyses [20, 21]: motion correction between temporal slices was applied, followed by determination of a baseline level of signal intensity (Fig. 1a), and regions of interests (ROIs) were manually drawn on all slices around the peri-articular muscle groups: extensors (vastus lateralis, vastus medialis) and flexors (biceps femoris, sartorius, gracilis, triceps surae, popliteus, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus) without delineation of individual muscles (Fig. 1c). Major vascular branches were avoided. Finally, the ROIs were summed and averaged into three volumes of interest (VOIs): Extensor VOI (extensor ROIs), Flexor VOI (flexor ROIs) and Total Muscle VOI (consisting of all ROIs).

Fig. 1
figure 1

DCE-MRI analysis. DCE-MRI analysis is based on changes in signal intensity over time for each voxel within the VOI. The signal intensity changes calculated relatively to the baseline signal intensity and the changes over time can be plotted as time-intensity-curves (TICs): a TIC from a point of interest in the popliteal artery with the characteristics of tissue with high perfusion: rapid increase in signal intensity, which reaches a plateau and a subsequent rapid decrease (washout) (x-axis: time (s); y-axis: relative signal intensity (baseline = 1.0)). IRE: Initial Rate of Enhancement; ME: Maximal Enhancement; IRW: initial rate of washout. b Assignment and color–coding of the voxels within the ROIs based on the shape of the TICs: No enhancement (no color); Persistent (blue); Plateau (green) and Washout (red) represent the most perfused voxels. c Region of interests (ROIs) around the peri-articular knee muscles avoiding major vascular branches. Blue: extensor muscle; Yellow: flexor muscles. d Parametric map of Initial Rate of Enhancement. Brighter colors indicate higher values

Full size image

As previously described in detail [15, 21], heuristic DCE-MRI analysis is based on changes in signal intensity over time in each voxel. The signal intensity changes are calculated relatively to the baseline signal intensity and changes over time can be plotted as time-intensity-curves (TICs) (Fig. 1a). Based on a robust classification scheme [21], the dedicated software automatically assigns each voxel, based on the shape of linear approximations of the TICs, to one of four enhancement patterns (Fig. 1b). The muscle perfusion parameters (see Table 1 and Additional file 1) were calculated on a voxel-by-voxel basis and averaged across each VOI [21, 22]. A pharmacokinetic parameter, Ktrans, was calculated as described in Riis et al. 2016 [16] with the T1-relaxivity values of muscle and blood set at 1420 and 1400 ms, respectively.

Table 1 Definitions of the muscle perfusion variables (DCE-MRI)
Full size table

Outcomes

Outcomes were measured at baseline and after the 12 weeks of intervention. For the purpose of this exploratory outcome analysis, we examined changes from baseline to follow-up, looking at the outcomes: muscle perfusion from DCE-MRI, patient-reported pain and function using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire (0(worst)–100(best) [23], physical performance by knee extensor and flexor muscle strength test [24] and the six-minute walking test (6MWT) [25] (see the Additional file 1 for details).

DCE-MRI derived perfusion variables are listed and explained in Table 1. All have previously been used in knee OA- and rheumatoid arthritis studies [14,15,16,17, 26, 27]; except Initial Rate of Enhancement and Maximal Enhancement Indices (for details see the Additional file 1).

Intra- and inter observer reproducibility of the DCE-MRI analyses were assessed for the Total VOI on a random subsample (n = 10) in which manual segmentations were repeated after a minimum of 4 weeks. The intra-observer reliability of the volume (cm3) of the Total Muscle VOI was ICC = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98 to 0.99). ICC of the muscle perfusion variables was ≥0.99 (in each case, the lower limit of the 95% CI was ≥0.91′). Due to low reproducibility of the Ktrans it was not included in the further analysis. Details of reproducibility of the DCE-MRI variables are presented in the Additional file 1.

The reliability of KOOS [28], muscle strength tests [24], and 6MWT has been demonstrated [29].

Statistical methods

As pre-specified in the main trial protocol, the study focuses on individuals who adhere to the protocol. The per-protocol population was defined as participants with 12 or fewer incidences of non-attendance at exercise sessions in the ET group, and no exercise in the CG. The present exploratory analyses aim at investigating the effects of exercise on muscle perfusion in the peri-articular knee muscles; thus, only individuals included in the per-protocol population with complete DCE-MRI data sets at baseline and follow-up were included in the present analyses (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow chart

Full size image

Individual changes from baseline were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the follow-up value for all outcomes. To assess group mean differences in the changes from baseline in all variables (purpose 1), analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) was used with change from baseline at follow-up as dependent variable, and baseline value of the dependent variable, treatment group, and gender (due to stratification by gender when randomising) as covariates [30]. For sensitivity purposes the analyses were repeated with further inclusion of age, weight and gender as covariates. All analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Ancillary analyses

To explore whether changes from baseline to follow-up in the muscle perfusion variables were associated with changes in pain and function (KOOS) and physical performance measures (purpose 2), we assessed the rank correlation (Spearman’s rho) of changes from baseline between the DCE-MRI muscle perfusion variables, KOOS subscales, muscle strength, and 6MWT across the entire population.

Furthermore, we investigated the potential effect mediation of changes in the DCE-MRI perfusion variables for changes in KOOS pain in a post-hoc mediation analysis using a model-based approach with nonparametric bootstrap for variance estimation. The mediation models were adjusted for the same variables as the primary analysis (i.e. baseline KOOS pain and gender). We estimated an average causal mediation effect [31], i.e. the amount of the total effect that are mediated by a specific variable, as well as the proportion of the total effect that is mediated. The R software, version 3.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), with the R Package ‘mediation’ for Causal Mediation Analysis [32] was used.

Results

Of the 60 included participants in the main trial, 31 were randomised to ET and 29 to the CG. The present analyses involved participants who adhered to the protocol with complete DCE-MRI data: 33 participants constituted the DCE-MRI per-protocol population (ET, n = 16; CG, n = 17). In the DCE-MRI per-protocol population group, imbalances were present in age, weight and BMI at baseline, with the ET group being older and less overweight. Details of study flow are given in Fig. 2. For baseline characteristics and data, see Table 2. There were no statistically significant differences between the DCE-MRI per-protocol population and the population not included in this study (ET, n = 15; CG, n = 12).

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of the patients: Demographics, self-reported symptoms (KOOS), DCE-MRI perfusion variables, and physical function
Full size table

DCE-MRI perfusion variables

At follow-up there were statistically significant group differences in changes from baseline in all muscle perfusion variables in favor of ET in the Total Muscle and Flexor VOIs showing a relative increase in the ET group compared with the CG.

Furthermore, in the Extensor VOI, the changes in Initial Rate of Enhancement Composite Score (IRExNvoxel) and Initial Rate of Enhancement Index (IRExNvoxel%) were statistically significantly different in favor of ET, showing similar patterns as for the Total Muscle and Flexor VOIs, with a relative increase in the ET group compared with the CG. The results are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 Comparison of changes from baseline in outcomes adjusted for baseline values and gender
Full size table

KOOS questionnaire

There was a statistically significant and clinically relevant group difference (10.7 KOOS points (95%CI 3.3 to 18.1)) in changes from baseline in KOOS pain in favor of ET similar to the per-protocol population in the main study [7]. No statistically significant group differences were observed in the other KOOS subscales (Table 3).

Physical performance measures

No statistically significant group differences were observed in changes from baseline to follow-up in the muscle strength variables and in 6MWT (Table 3).

Sensitivity analyses

The results were robust to sensitivity analysis, with only slight changes in the estimates (see the Additional file 1).

Ancillary analyses

Changes from baseline in KOOS pain were positively correlated with changes in The Proportion of Highly Perfused Voxels (%) (Nvoxel%) and Maximal Enhancement Index (MExNvoxel%) in the Total and Flexor VOIs (r ≥ 0.36, P ≤ 0.042). Further, changes in KOOS pain were positively correlated with changes in IRE Composite score (IRExNvoxel) and ME Composite score (MExNvoxel) in the Flexor VOI (r ≥ 0.35, P ≤ 0.044). This indicates that pain reduction was associated with increase in the degree and area of perfusion of the peri-articular muscles (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Scatterplots of significant correlations

Full size image

No statistically significant associations were found between changes in muscle perfusion variables and the remaining 4 KOOS subscales (r < 0.18, P > 0.317). Changes from baseline in isometric knee extensor muscle strength were the only muscle strength variable which correlated significantly with changes in the muscle perfusion variables (the highest Spearman’s rho = − 0.46, P = 0.028). No other statistically significant associations were found between changes in muscle perfusion variables and changes in the variables of physical performance (highest Spearman’s rho = − 0.38, P = 0.076) (See the Additional file 1 for correlation matrix).

Over all, in the comparison between exercise and a no-attention control group, for changes in muscle perfusion variables (DCE-MRI) there was no statistically significant mediation of the pain-reducing effect of exercise in patients with knee OA, except for three muscle perfusion variables in the Flexor VOI. These were initial Rate of Enhancement Composite Score (IRExNvoxel), Maximal Enhancement Composite Score (MExNvoxel) and Maximal Enhancement index (MExNvoxel%) (Table 4), mediating 26% (95% CI, 0 to 1.24), 28% (95% CI, 1 to 1.71) and 28% (95% CI, 1 to 1.46), of the total effect of the pain-reducing effect of exercise, respectively. However, the upper limit of the 95% CI of the estimated proportions mediated suggest a potential mediation of effects on pain by all muscle perfusion variables (DCE-MRI) (Table 4).

Table 4 The mediation effect of changes in DCE-MRI perfusion variables for changes in KOOS pain
Full size table

Discussion

Our results suggest that exercise therapy sustain peri-articular knee muscle perfusion compared to a no attention CG, as the participants in the ET exhibited a constant level of muscle perfusion in contrast to decreased perfusion in the CG over the 12-week intervention period. Besides the differences in muscle perfusion, exercise had a clinically relevant effect on self-reported pain. Further, across the population, changes in muscle perfusion were associated with changes in self-reported pain but not with physical function and performance. Although the mediation analyses overall were not statistically significant, all effects were in the expected direction. Altogether, these results indicate that muscle perfusion may be part of the underlying mechanisms of the pain-relieving effects of exercise. The present results extend our previous cross-sectional observation that more widespread muscle perfusion associates with less pain [12] and support the notion that muscle perfusion plays a role in the effects of exercise on knee OA pain [12].

Mechanisms of changed muscle perfusion

The current study does not provide insight into the underlying mechanism of changed muscle perfusion. Exercise causes structural adaptations in the muscles, such as increased capillarisation or angiogenesis as a physiological response [9,10,11]. Based on the present results, it could be speculated that exercise in knee OA prevents such loss of capillarisation in the muscle tissue. Exercise programs specifically aiming at physiological muscle adaptations (e.g. resistance or cardiovascular training) may prove even more effective in inducing changes in muscle perfusion and are also beneficial in terms of pain [33, 34].

Evaluating the effects of exercise

Pain experience is affected by psychological variables, such as depression and quality of life [35, 36], and exercise is likely to change these [37,38,39]. It is plausible that exercise-induced pain reductions may also be mediated through improvements in psychological well-being.

As exercise therapy cannot be blinded to the provider or to the patient, the observed clinical effects may be facilitated by effects associated with attention and study participation [8]. However, as the DCE-MRI assessment of muscle perfusion is a truly objective method, this study provides evidence of biological mechanisms associated with the pain-relieving effects of exercise therapy. Unlike radiographs, where there is discordance between radiographic findings and pain [40], and a poor short-term responsiveness to detecting change [41], muscle perfusion may be a potential objective marker of exercise-induced pain reduction (and potentially other treatments) on a structural level in knee OA.

Increased perfusion of intra-articular structures (e.g. synovium and the infra-patellar fat pad) are conventionally interpreted as signs of inflammation, and studies have repeatedly shown that intra-articular perfusion associates with a higher degree of pain [15,16,17, 27]. Our current and previous results [12] differ from these observations as the pain–perfusion relationship in the peri-articular muscle tissue is opposite. This could suggest a possible trade-off between intra-articular and peri-articular perfusion in the response to inflammation or treatment with subsequent changes in pain. This proposed mechanism needs further exploration.

We assessed knee OA pain using the KOOS questionnaire and found clinically relevant group differences that exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 8–10 KOOS points as suggested by the developers of the questionnaire (www.koos.nu). This increases the relevance of our findings. In contrast, the MCIDs in the muscle perfusion variables have not been established, which encumbers interpretation of our results. However, the observed differences in muscle perfusion variables were all beyond the smallest detectable changes, and the reliability of the image analyses was satisfactory, which altogether strengthens our confidence in the results.

When evaluating the effects of exercise in knee OA, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and performance-based tests are recommended and frequently used [5, 42, 43]. PROs and performance-based tests are affected by patient-provider interaction [44, 45], which is an important source of bias when the intervention cannot be blinded. Furthermore, the validity of performance-based tests (e.g. muscle strength) may be challenged by pain or fear of pain during the test [46, 47]. This means that a high degree of participant cooperation is necessary, which increases the risks of measurement bias and underlines the need for objective and sensitive measures in the evaluation of the underlying effects of exercise. DCE-MRI is such an objective method, and we applied it in the analysis of muscle perfusion, which is novel within OA research.

Strengths and limitations

The use of a rigorous randomised study design with pre-specified methods using standardised and validated image analyses with high reproducibility are major strengths of our study. On the other hand, the limited sample size and the many variables and statistical tests performed increase the chances for multiplicity. The fact that the study was designed and powered for another outcome are limitations and calls for replication in larger studies specifically designed for DCE-MRI. Nevertheless, we could detect clinically meaningful important signals associated with the effects of exercise, a universally recommended treatment for knee OA. Another important aspect to consider is the per protocol design of the study. This was done to investigate the underlying mechanisms of exercise and thus it is necessary to focus on the participants who had complete DCE-MRI assessments at both baseline and follow-up and who had adhered to the protocol, i.e. received the allocated intervention (exercise vs control). This is fundamentally different from intention to treat study designs and therefore this study cannot be used to inform clinical practice. An important limitation is that out of 14 potential mediation analyses (corresponding to KOOS subdomains, muscle strength measurements, and 6-min walk distance) we only analysed mediation of effects on KOOS pain as this was the only outcome with significant group differences. This analysis did not support that changes in muscle perfusion mediate pain improvements.

Conclusion

The pain-reducing effects of a 12-week exercise program are associated with changes in muscle perfusion quantified by DCE-MRI in individuals with knee OA, but whether the effects are mediated by muscle perfusion changes remains unclear.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

6MWT:

The six-minute walking test

ANCOVA:

Analyses of covariance

CG:

Control group

DCE-MRI:

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

ET:

Exercise therapy

Gd:

Gadolinium

KOOS:

The knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

Ktrans :

Contrast transfer coefficient from blood to extracellular space over time (min-1) and thus a measure of capillary permeability calculated using extended Tofts’s model.

MCID:

Minimal clinically important difference

OA:

Osteoarthritis

PROs:

Patient-reported outcomes

ROIs:

Regions of interest

TICs:

Time-intensity-curves

VOIs:

Volumes of interest

References

  1. National Institute for H, Clinical E. Osteoarthritis: national clinical guideline for care and management in adults. London: NICE; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(4):465–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22(3):363–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JWJ, Andreassen O, Christensen P, Conaghan PG, et al. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(7):1125–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Runhaar J, Luijsterburg P, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Identifying potential working mechanisms behind the positive effects of exercise therapy on pain and function in osteoarthritis; a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23(7):1071–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beckwee D, Vaes P, Cnudde M, Swinnen E, Bautmans I. Osteoarthritis of the knee: why does exercise work? A qualitative study of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(1):226–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henriksen M, Klokker L, Graven-Nielsen T, Bartholdy C, Schjodt JT, Bandak E, et al. Association of exercise therapy and reduction of pain sensitivity in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res(Hoboken). 2014;66(12):1836–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fransen M, McConnell S, Harmer AR, Van der Esch M, Simic M, Bennell KL. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(24):1554–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris BA. The influence of endurance and resistance exercise on muscle capillarization in the elderly: a review. Acta Physiol Scand. 2005;185(2):89–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoier B, Hellsten Y. Exercise-induced capillary growth in human skeletal muscle and the dynamics of VEGF. Microcirculation. 2014;21(4):301–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Egginton S. Invited review: activity-induced angiogenesis. Pflugers Arch - Eur J Physiol. 2008;457(5):963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bandak E, Boesen M, Bliddal H, Riis RG, Gudbergsen H, Henriksen M. Associations between muscle perfusion and symptoms in knee osteoarthritis: a cross sectional study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23(10):1721–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Galbraith SM, Lodge MA, Taylor NJ, Rustin GJ, Bentzen S, Stirling JJ, et al. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis. NMR Biomed. 2002;15(2):132–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Axelsen MB, Poggenborg RP, Stoltenberg M, Kubassova O, Boesen M, Horslev-Petersen K, et al. Reliability and responsiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2013;42(2):115–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Riis RG, Gudbergsen H, Simonsen O, Henriksen M, Al-Mashkur N, Eld M, et al. The association between histological, macroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging assessed synovitis in end-stage knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017;25(2):272–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Riis RG, Gudbergsen H, Henriksen M, Ballegaard C, Bandak E, Rottger D, et al. Synovitis assessed on static and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and its association with pain in knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(6):1099–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ballegaard C, Riis RGC, Bliddal H, Christensen R, Henriksen M, Bartels EM, et al. Knee pain and inflammation in the infrapatellar fat pad estimated by conventional and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in obese patients with osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22(7):933–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loeuille D, Rat AC, Goebel JC, Champigneulle J, Blum A, Netter P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis: which method best reflects synovial membrane inflammation?: correlations with clinical, macroscopic and microscopic features. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(9):1186–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber MA, Krix M, Delorme S. Quantitative evaluation of muscle perfusion with CEUS and with MR. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(10):2663–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kubassova O, Boesen M, Boyle RD, Cimmino MA, Jensen KE, Bliddal H, et al. Fast and robust analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI datasets. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 2):261–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kubassova O, Boesen M, Cimmino MA, Bliddal H. A computer-aided detection system for rheumatoid arthritis MRI data interpretation and quantification of synovial activity. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74(3):67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boesen M, Kubassova O, Cimmino MA, Ostergaard M, Taylor P, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI can monitor the very early inflammatory treatment response upon intra-articular steroid injection in the knee joint: a case report with review of the literature. Arthritis. 2011;2011:578252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lund H, Sondergaard K, Zachariassen T, Christensen R, Bulow P, Henriksen M, et al. Learning effect of isokinetic measurements in healthy subjects, and reliability and comparability of Biodex and lido dynamometers. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2005;25(2):75–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Enright PL. The six-minute walk test. Respir Care. 2003;48(8):783–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boesen M, Kubassova O, Parodi M, Bliddal H, Innocenti S, Garlaschi G, et al. Comparison of the manual and computer-aided techniques for evaluation of wrist synovitis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI on a dedicated scanner. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(2):202–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Riis RG, Henriksen M, Klokker L, Bartholdy C, Ellegaard K, Bandak E, et al. The effects of intra-articular glucocorticoids and exercise on pain and synovitis assessed on static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in knee osteoarthritis: exploratory outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016.

  28. Collins NJ, Prinsen CAC, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(8):1317–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD, Penney D. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lydersen S. Statistical review: frequently given comments. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(2):323–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kosuke Imai LK, Tingley D, Yamamoto T. Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2011;105(4):765–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dustin Tingley TY. Kentaro Hirose, Luke Keele, Kosuke Imai. Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Softw. 2014;59(5):1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bennell KL, Wrigley TV, Hunt MA, Lim BW, Hinman RS. Update on the role of muscle in the genesis and Management of Knee Osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2013;39(1):145–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lange AK, Vanwanseele B, Fiatarone Singh MA. Strength training for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(10):1488–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de Rooij M, van der Leeden M, Heymans MW, Holla JF, Hakkinen A, Lems WF, et al. Prognosis of pain and physical functioning in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res(Hoboken). 2016;68(4):481–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Edwards RR, Cahalan C, Mensing G, Smith M, Haythornthwaite JA. Pain, catastrophizing, and depression in the rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7(4):216–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Penninx BW, Rejeski WJ, Pandya J, Miller ME, Di BM, Applegate WB, et al. Exercise and depressive symptoms: a comparison of aerobic and resistance exercise effects on emotional and physical function in older persons with high and low depressive symptomatology. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57(2):124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fransen M, Crosbie J, Edmonds J. Physical therapy is effective for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(1):156–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tanaka R, Ozawa J, Kito N, Moriyama H. Does exercise therapy improve the health-related quality of life of people with knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(10):3309–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bedson J, Croft PR. The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hunter DJ, Altman RD, Cicuttini F, Crema MD, Duryea J, Eckstein F, et al. OARSI clinical trials recommendations: knee imaging in clinical trials in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23(5):698–715.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Messier SP, Callahan LF, Golightly YM, Keefe FJ. OARSI clinical trials recommendations: design and conduct of clinical trials of lifestyle diet and exercise interventions for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23(5):787–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McAlindon TE, Driban JB, Henrotin Y, Hunter DJ, Jiang GL, Skou ST, et al. OARSI clinical trials recommendations: design, conduct, and reporting of clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23(5):747–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):110–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Benedetti F. Placebo effects: understanding the mechanisms in health and disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

  46. Henriksen M, Rosager S, Aaboe J, Graven-Nielsen T, Bliddal H. Experimental knee pain reduces muscle strength. J Pain. 2011;12(4):460–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Holm B, Kristensen MT, Husted H, Kehlet H, Bandholm T. Thigh and knee circumference, knee-extension strength, and functional performance after fast-track total hip arthroplasty. PMR. 2011;3(2):117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff at the Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals for helping in obtaining the MRI.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from The Association of Danish Physiotherapists; Bispebjerg- and Frederiksberg Hospital; The Danish Rheumatism Association, The Oak Foundation; The Lundbeck Foundation; and The Danish Council for Independent Research, Medical Sciences (grant no: 10–093704). The funding sources did not influence study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Elisabeth Bandak, Mikael Boesen, Henning Bliddal, Robert G. C. Riis, Sabrina Mai Nielsen, Louise Klokker, Cecilie Bartholdy & Marius Henriksen

  2. Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Mikael Boesen, Robert G. C. Riis & Janus Damm Nybing

  3. Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

    Sabrina Mai Nielsen

  4. Department of physical and occupational therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Cecilie Bartholdy & Marius Henriksen

Authors
  1. Elisabeth Bandak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikael Boesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Henning Bliddal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert G. C. Riis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sabrina Mai Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Louise Klokker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cecilie Bartholdy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Janus Damm Nybing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marius Henriksen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version. EB performed all the MRI analyses, contributed to the study design, statistical design and analysis, interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript; MB contributed to the study design, radiological supervision, and interpretation of the data; RR contributed in the inter-observer reliability analysis, radiological supervision, and interpretation of the data; SMN conducted the mediation analyses and contributed in interpretation of the data; HB, CB, LK, JDN contributed to the study design and interpretation of the data; MH contributed to the study design, statistical design and analysis, and interpretation of the data. All the authors had access to the data and analyses. MH takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to finished article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Bandak.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Regional Health Research Ethics Committee of The Capital Region of Denmark (H-2-2011-159) and was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Prior to inclusion all participants gave written informed consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MB is chairman of the medical and scientific board, Image Analysis Ltd., London, UK and has stock options. He has received fees/honoraria (<$10,000) covering travel/accommodation costs as well as a small yearly honorarium. All other authors have nothing to declare.

RR and JDN: Consultants for Image Analysis Ltd. (analyses of MRIs and conventional radiographs).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bandak, E., Boesen, M., Bliddal, H. et al. Exercise-induced pain changes associate with changes in muscle perfusion in knee osteoarthritis: exploratory outcome analyses of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20, 491 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2858-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2858-8

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us