Skip to main content

Treatment outcome of chronic low back pain and radiographic lumbar disc degeneration are associated with inflammatory and matrix degrading gene variants: a prospective genetic association study



Inflammatory and matrix degrading gene variants have been reported to be associated with disc degeneration. Some of these variants also modulate peripheral pain. This study examines the association of these genetic variants with radiographic lumbar disc degeneration and changes in pain and disability at long-term after surgical and cognitive behavioural management.


93 unrelated patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) for duration of >1 year and lumbar disc degeneration were treated with lumbar fusion or cognitive intervention and exercises. Standardised questionnaires included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for CLBP, were filled in by patients both at baseline and at 9 years follow-up. Degenerative changes at baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography scans, were graded as moderate and severe (N=79). Yield and quality of blood and saliva DNA was assessed by nano drop spectrophotometry. Eight SNPs in 5 inflammatory and matrix degrading genes were successfully genotyped. Single marker and haplotype association with severity of degeneration, number of discs involved, changes in ODI and VAS CLBP, was done using Haploview, linear regression and R-package Haplostats.


Association analysis of individual SNPs revealed association of IL18RAP polymorphism rs1420100 with severe degeneration (p = 0.05) and more than one degenerated disc (p = 0.02). From the same gene two SNPs, rs917997 and rs1420106, were found to be in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) and were associated with post treatment improvement in disability (p = 0.02). Haplotype association analysis of 5 SNPs spanning across IL18RAP, IL18R1 and IL1A genes revealed significant associations with improvement in disability (p=0.02) and reduction in pain (p=0.04). An association was found between MMP3 polymorphism rs72520913 and improvement in pain (p = 0.03) and with severe degeneration (p = 0.006).


The findings of the current study suggest a role of variation at inflammatory and matrix degrading genes with severity of lumbar disc degeneration, pain and disability.

Peer Review reports


Fifty percent report to have back pain yearly in Norway [1]. Degeneration of the lumbar intervertebral disc is regarded as a common cause of chronic low back pain (CLBP) [2]. The etiology of lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) is complex and not fully explained. LDD is considered to be a multifactorial disorder involving numerous genetic and environmental factors and their interactions. Heavy physical loading, trauma, bending, twisting, prolonged non-neutral work postures, vibrations during vehicle driving, cigarette smoking have been suggested to be associated with disc degeneration [3, 4]. The pathogenesis of LDD involves the degradation of the normal disc matrix into a disorganized fibrous and less cartilaginous disc, progressing to the formation of clefts and fissures and ultimately compromising the disc integrity [5]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies have established a strong heritability of degenerative changes among twins [6] and genes related to the structural proteins of the discs (aggrecan and collagens), inflammation and matrix degradation have been reported to be associated with the pathologic and radiographic changes of LDD [710].

The correlation between severity of degeneration and clinical symptoms is not strong and recent studies reported no correlation between changes in degenerated disc and changes in treatment [11, 12].Variants of some genes coding for inflammatory mediators: interleukin 1A (IL1A); interleukin 18 receptor 1 (IL18R1); interleukin 18 receptor accessory protein (IL18RAP); cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) and matrix metalloprotease 3 (MMP3), have all been found to be associated with different phenotypes of LDD [9, 10, 1316]. They have also been reported to be involved in peripheral modulation of pain [17]. These genes are candidates for assessment of their association with degeneration, pain and disability.

Pro inflammatory cytokines are involved in extracellular matrix degradation and fibrosis of the disc, and play a role in peripheral neuropathic pain. IL1 causes degeneration by regulating the destruction of disc matrix by activating degradative enzymes and inhibiting resynthesis of proteoglycans. It also modulates pain by inducing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis which in turn enhances the activity of phospholipase A2 and COX2. IL1 secreted by herniated discs, along with IL6 and TNF-α sensitize the nociceptors that innervate the disc [18, 19]. IL18 is another proinflammatory cytokine that shares many biological, structural and functional properties with IL1 [20] and mediates its function through its receptor IL18R (IL18R1 and IL18RAP). It exerts its pro-inflammatory effects by inducing the production of IL-1β, TNF-α, chemokines, nitric oxide and prostaglandins [21, 22].

MMP3 (stromelysin 1) mediates degeneration of the disc by degradation of matrix proteoglycans and collagens [23] and also contributes to neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury [24]. MMP3 gene polymorphism 5A/6A (rs72520913) regulates the MMP3 gene expression with 5A allele possessing twice the promoter activity than 6A[25].

The COX2 gene (PTGS2) may be involved in disc herniation through the up regulation of PGE2 [26]. It is also reported to be involved in the peripheral modulation of pain [17, 27].

Associations between inflammatory and matrix degrading gene variants and changes in long- term pain and disability after surgical and cognitive behavioural management, have to our knowledge not been investigated previously. The aim of the present study was to examine these associations. We also analyzed the yield and purity of DNA acquired from both blood and saliva in our patients, in light of an increase in use of saliva as a source of genomic DNA for genetic association studies, compared to the blood [28].


Study design

The cohort was from a randomized control trial, and a prospective design was used for obtaining clinical data at long term follow-up and was in the current study used for genetic association analyses.

Patient sample

124 unrelated Norwegian patients with chronic LBP recruited from two previously published randomized control trials [2932] were invited to participate. At baseline each patient was examined by at least one spine surgeon and one specialist in physical and rehabilitation medicine. The inclusion criteria were: age 25-60 years; LBP with duration >1 year despite of undergoing supervised non-operative treatment; Oswestry disability index (ODI) score > 30 of 100 points; and disc degeneration at one or two levels i.e. L4-L5 and/or L5-S1 as assessed by plain radiography. Exclusion criteria were: widespread myofascial pain; spinal stenosis with reduced walking distance and associated neurological signs; recurrent disc herniation or lateral recess stenosis with clinical signs of rediculopathy; inflammatory disease; previous spinal fracture; previous surgical fusion of spine; pelvic pain; generalized disc degeneration on plain radiographic assessment; ongoing serious somatic or psychiatric disease that could exclude treatment alternatives; registered medical abuse and reluctance in accepting either one or both treatment modalities of this study.

Ninety nine patients responded to the follow up examination at median 9 years (range 7-11 years). Ninety three patients (35 males and 58 females) were ethnically West European, and hence 6 were excluded due to a non-European ethnicity. Out of the 93 patients, 51 were randomized to lumbar instrumented postero-lateral fusion with transpendicular screws at L4-L5 and /or L5-S1 and 42 to cognitive intervention and exercises given by physiotherapists and a specialist in physical and rehabilitation medicine. This intervention involved one week plus two weeks at outpatient facility interrupted by two weeks at home. Five patients randomized to fusion did not undergo surgery and 14 patients randomized to cognitive treatment had later undergone fusion.

The eligible patients were informed orally as well as in writing about the study procedures before consenting. The Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics in Health Region South-East Norway approved the study. It was also recommended by the Biobank Register at Norwegian Institute of Public Health and by the patient’s ombudsman at, Oslo University hospital.

Outcome variables of pain and disability

The clinical data regarding age, ethnicity, gender, and presence of any other medical condition was obtained at baseline. At baseline and at 9 year follow-up, these patients were given standardised questionnaires for assessing the disability and pain. Disability was estimated by ODI comprising 10 questions about pain related disability, each having six verbal response alternatives. The sum of the response score was calculated and presented as percentage where 0% represents no pain and disability, and 100% represents the worst possible pain and disability [33]. LBP intensity was scored on three vertical visual analog scales (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable). Patients scored their maximum pain, minimum pain and current pain the last week, respectively. The mean of these three measurements was calculated [34].

The outcome variables were the change in ODI and VAS scores at follow-up (post treatment value – pre treatment value).

Radiological assessment of disc degeneration

Disc degeneration in all patients was assessed for levels L1-S1 by plain radiography. MRI (N = 65) and Computed Tomography scanning [CT] (N = 14) were also used, but not in all patients. MRI signal changes in lumbar discs were graded into six patterns [35]. Pattern 1: Thickened cleft but normal disc signal intensity and height with no protrusion; Pattern 2: Similar to pattern 1 with slight overall reduction in disc signal intensity; Pattern 3: Normal disc signal intensity, height and cleft with small protrusion; Pattern 4: Disc signal intensity was further reduced, mild narrowing of the disc space, cleft present with definite protrusion of the disc; Pattern 5: Marked reduction in disc signal intensity and height with protrusion and cleft poorly defined; Pattern 6: Minimal or lost disc signal with marked resorption and protrusion of the disc with no cleft.

MRI changes were dichotomized into moderate if assessed to be of pattern 1-4; and severe if the pattern was 5 or 6. Degeneration on CT scans was classified moderate if disc height was considered to be < 50% of the normal height and severe if disc height was reduced > 50%.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA from 89 patients was extracted from approx 9 ml of venous blood by salting out method [36]. From all 93 patients, DNA was extracted from approx 2 ml of saliva using a collection kit, purifier and protocol from DNA genotek (Kanata, Ontario Canada). This means that in four patients DNA was extracted from saliva only. Both blood samples and saliva were collected at the Hospital facility. DNA quality and concentration were measured on a DNA spectrophotometer (ND-1000, NanoDrop, Wilmington USA).

For the 89 patients, we compared the purity and total DNA yield (μg) from blood and saliva samples. The amount of DNA (μg) obtained given as mean [SEM] from blood sample was 229.3 [8.0] and from saliva, it was 339.3 [21.6] respectively (Figure 1). Purity of the DNA was assessed by the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm (A260/280), and values ≥ 1.8 indicate a pure DNA. The mean A260/280 ratio for the blood sample was 1.86 [0.001] and 1.94 [0.007] for saliva, respectively. There were no drop out for DNA samples extracted from blood, but one drop out from a DNA sample extracted from saliva (A260/280 < 1.8). For 48 patients, DNA from blood as well as saliva was genotyped together, and genotype success rate of DNA from both sources was comparable for the tested SNPs.

Figure 1

Scattergram of DNA yield ( μg ) in 89 blood and saliva samples. Scattergram of total DNA yield (μg) in 89 blood and saliva samples. The dashed line represents the mean value and continuous lines denote standard error of mean (SEM).

Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and genotyping

A total of eight single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from five different inflammatory and matrix degrading genes were tested on the basis of previously reported associations with disc degeneration and their established role in pain related pathways. These included SNPs from interleukin genes (IL1A, IL18R1, and IL18RAP), matrix metalloprotease-3 gene (MMP3), and cyclooxygenase-2 gene (COX2).

Genotyping for the SNPs was performed by Sequenom system, using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry at the Centre for interactive genetics; Cigene, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) Ås, Norway.

Statistical analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, pair wise linkage disequilibrium (LD), genotype success rate and minor allele frequency were calculated using the statistical programme Haploview version 4.2 [37]. The cut off value for divergence from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was (p ≥ 0.001).

Linear and logistic regression analysis was performed for assessing the effect of each individual SNP on the regression of degeneration, number of segments involved, ODI and LBP change as dependent variables, along with controlling for the covariates age, sex and fusion. Association was tested using three different types of genetic models on the same data set. A recessive genetic model, assuming that severe degeneration and change in post treatment pain scores was increased / decreased when having two copies of a specific allele compared to having only one or zero copies of the specific allele. The mean difference in pain and disability score (β) between patients having two copies and those having one or zero copies was estimated in regression analysis. In the additive model, we assumed that the change in the progression and pain scores was increased two fold by possessing two copies of the specific allele, compared to having a single copy. For the dominant genetic model we pre specified the dominant allele to be a risk allele and carriers were compared with the opposite non-risk homozygous alleles [38]. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We consider our study to be an explorative genetic association study, and therefore the p-values were not formally corrected for multiple testing.

Association between the common haplotypes of the SNPs with frequency > 0.02 and severity of degeneration, numbers of segments involved, pain and disability, along with effect of the covariates was tested using the R package Haplostats [39]. The estimated frequencies and regression coefficients were computed by the function haplo.glm using an additive model. The reference haplotype was selected to be the most frequent haplotype as a baseline for linear regression by the software.


The genotype success rates for the eight SNPs were 100% and minor allele frequencies observed for the tested SNPs in the present population were comparable to what has been reported for European Hap Map samples (Table 1). No divergence from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium observed for any of the tested markers.

Table 1 Overview of the selected SNPs and their genotyping performance

SNP associations with pain and disability outcome

Association analysis of individual SNPs with the 9 years post treatment change in pain and disability scores using a recessive genetic model among 93 patients, revealed statistically significant associations between post treatment improvement in disability (ODI change) and two SNPs from IL18RAP gene, rs1420106 and rs917997 (p = 0.02) (Table 2). The alleles at these two polymorphisms rs1420106-A and rs917997-T were in strong LD (D'=1 and r 2=0.9) and hence represented the same association. A significant association (p = 0.03) was also observed between post treatment improvement in pain and a polymorphism (rs72520913) of the MMP3 gene (Table 2). Our study had 80% power to detect a change of 22.2 in ODI and 19.7 in VAS LBP with a significance level of 0.05 for the associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Table 2 Association analysis of inflammatory and matrix degrading gene polymorphisms with 9 years ODI change and VAS LBP change in 93 patients with LDD and LBP

No significant effect of the other covariates included in the models (age, gender and fusion) was observed.

Table 3 describes the study population characteristics and values for post treatment disability and pain reduction according to the genotype for associated SNPs. For IL18RAP SNP rs917997, we observed that improvement in disability was reduced among T/T homozygotes (N = 7, mean [SD] – 2.0 [17.8]) compared to the C/C homozygotes (N = 50, Mean [SD] – 21.5 [19.6]), and T/C heterozygotes (N = 36, mean [SD] – 21.4 [21.5]). The improvement in disability for the other associated IL18RAP SNP rs1420106 was also the less among A/A homozygotes (N = 7, mean [SD] – 2.0 [17.8]), where as larger improvement was observed for A/G heterozygotes (N = 33, mean [SD] – 23.8 [20.8]) and G/G homozygotes (N = 53, mean [SD] – 20.0 [20.8]).

Table 3 Characteristics of the patients ( N =93) carrying different genotypes for the associated SNPs

Similarly, lower reduction in pain was observed among patients who were homozygous A/A for MMP3 SNP rs72520913 (N = 18, mean [SD] – 10.8 [18.5]) compared to the heterozygous A/C (N = 56, mean [SD] – 28.7 [33.2]) and homozygous C/C (N = 19, mean [SD] – 25.5 [26.2]) genotypes.

Additive and dominant genetic model association testing revealed no statistically significant associations between post treatment ODI and VAS LBP change and any of the tested markers.

Associations with severity of degeneration (MRI and CT) and number of discs involved

We observed an association of the IL18RAP polymorphism rs1420100 with severe degeneration (p = 0.05; odds ratio = 3.9; 95% CI = 1.1-19.3) compared to moderate, and with degeneration of more than one disc compared to one (p = 0.02; odds ratio = 4.1; 95% CI = 1.3-14.0), using a dominant model. MMP3 polymorphism rs72520913 was found to be associated with severe degeneration (p = 0.006; odds ratio = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.5-9.4) using the additive model but no associations were observed for the recessive genetic model.

Haplotype association analysis for severity of degeneration and treatment outcome

The five SNPs (rs2071375, rs2287037, rs1420100, rs1420106, rs917997) from the biologically similar pro-inflammatory neighbouring genes located on chromosome 2 (IL1A, IL18R1, IL18RAP) were in LD and four common haplotypes accounted for > 80% of all haplotypes (Table 4).

Table 4 Estimated haplotype frequencies for SNPs at IL1A, IL18R1 and IL18RAP chromosome 2 in 93 LDD patients with LBP

Haplotype association analysis revealed significant associations for the haplotype T-C-C-A-T with improvement in disability (p = 0.02; mean difference = 20.0; 95% CI = 3.0-37.0) and reduction in pain (p = 0.04; mean difference = 24.0; 95% CI = 1.4-46.5) at 9 year follow-up. No association of any haplotype of chromosome 2 markers was observed with the severity of degeneration and number of degenerated discs.


Several studies have previously reported the association of inflammatory and matrix degrading genes with LDD [9, 10, 14], and findings of the present study confirms that some of these genes influence the radiographic degeneration of the lumbar disc. The novelty of the present study is that it also highlights the influence of these variants on pain and disability at long term in patients treated with spinal fusion or cognitive intervention and exercises for CLBP.

This study observed associations of IL18RAP polymorphism rs1420100 and MMP3 polymorphism rs72520913 with severe degeneration and for rs1420100 also with more than one degenerated disc. Interestingly two other polymorphisms of IL18RAP, rs917997 and rs1420106, showed association with improvement in disability. Furthermore the MMP3 polymorphism, rs72520913, was observed to be associated with reduction in pain.

The associations between IL18RAP polymorphism rs1420100 with severity of degeneration and the number of degenerated discs are in line with results from a previous study by Videman et al. They were the first to identify an association of this SNP of IL18RAP gene with LDD [10]. In their study of 588 monozygotic and dizygotic male twins from the Finish population, they reported a significant association with disc desiccation at both upper and lower lumbar levels, which is considered to be an earlier stage of degenerative process. They did not find an association with disc height narrowing or bulging. In contrast, we only assessed the lower lumbar segments (L4-L5 and L5-S1). These are usually more prone to severe degeneration and our association was observed in patients who had degeneration and chronic LBP and were considered for lumbar fusion. Although our findings strengthen the evidence in support of previously reported association of IL18RAP gene variant with radiographic lumbar disc degeneration, we could not rule out that these findings could be by chance. The small sample size and no correction for multiple testing, does not allow drawing firm conclusions.

IL18RAP is a subunit of IL18 receptor along with IL18R1 [40] and is essential for IL18 signal transduction and ligand binding affinity. IL18R mediated activation of T cells and natural killer cells results in secretion of interferon gamma (IFN-γ), which induce macrophages to secrete cytokines TNF-α and IL-1, which are eventually involved in increased matrix degradation, by production of cytokines and proteases. These have been found to be secreted by the cells of degenerated and herniated discs [4143]. This sheds light on a putative connection between inflammation and degeneration and a possible pathway for back pain.

Interestingly in the present study, two other tested IL18RAP polymorphisms, rs917997 and rs1420106, did not display association with severity of degeneration, but with reduction in disability. The reduction was less pronounced among T/T genotypes at rs917997 compared to C/C and C/T indicating that carrying even one copy of T allele was associated with reduced improvement in disability. Similar lower reduction appeared to be attributed to A allele for rs1420106 where less improvement was observed with A/A compared to the G/G and A/G genotypes. The alleles at these polymorphisms rs1420106-A and rs917997-T were in strong LD and both revealed similar association with improvement in disability. On the other hand, the alleles rs1420100-A and rs917997-T or rs1420106-A, were never carried on the same haplotype, but were in complete negative LD (D' = - 1). Therefore we speculate that different genetic variants at the same gene, i.e. IL18RAP, affect both the severity of degeneration and improvement in outcome. The polymorphisms rs1420106 and rs917997 were found to be associated with disc desiccation in the study by Videman et al, but no association of these polymorphisms was observed with severity of degeneration in the present study. The SNP rs917997 has previously been reported to be associated with differential expression of IL18RAP gene in coeliac disease patients [44].

We observed that a haplotype T-C-C-A-T spanning the IL1A, IL18R1 and IL18RAP genes located on chromosome 2, revealed association with improvements in pain and disability. IL-18 is a member of the IL-1 family of cytokines. These are related in terms of structure, receptor family and signal transduction pathways [45] and both are located on chromosome 2. Based on these similarities, we considered the IL1A rs2071375 along with IL18 receptor polymorphisms when testing the association of haplotypes.

The association of MMP3 SNP rs72520913 with severe degeneration is in agreement with previously reported associations with disc degeneration [9]. This SNP has been reported to regulate the MMP3 gene expression where the 5A allele possesses twice the promoter activity compared to the 6A allele [25]. A study involving elderly patients found the 5A/5A genotype to be associated with presence of osteophytes, narrowing of discs and end plate sclerosis [15]. Another study evaluated the interaction between this polymorphism and whole body vibration (gene-environment interaction) and revealed susceptibility between the 5A allele and LDD [16]. Together with IL1A it has been reported to be associated with type II Modic changes [13]. In vitro studies have also highlighted the role of MMP3 in intervertebral disc degeneration through matrix degradation [46]. Our finding supports the role of variant(s) in promoter region of MMP3 gene in LDD, and based on the fact that such polymorphisms may enhance the MMP3 expression, we speculate that they may ultimately disturb the balance of ECM of the lumbar disc. Contrary to this, the association of the same polymorphism with improvement in pain after treatment, is difficult to understand, but in line with other studies that have reported a low correlation between clinical and radiographic outcome [12, 32].

The inflammatory genes tested in the present study are interestingly also involved in the modulation of pain. They regulate the production of cytokines that may contribute to LBP by inducing growth of nerve and vascular elements [47, 48]. IL18 induced synthesis of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) has also been proposed to play a role in discogenic pain [49]. MMP3 and IL1A have been associated with neuropathic pain and sensitization of nocireceptors [18, 24].

Our finding of a higher yield of DNA extracted from saliva compared to blood was similar to Mitsouras et al report that DNA yield from saliva was superior to blood and buccal swabs [50]. In accordance with our finding that saliva DNA was of high quality, a study had previously reported the saliva DNA extracted using similar kits and methods as ours, to be of high quality [51]. Other studies have reported an equal or lower DNA yield from saliva compared to the blood [28, 52].

The main strengths of the present study include long term follow up of patients, a high genotype success rate alongside homogeneity of the sample population (all subjects were of homogenous Norwegian origin) and testing of polymorphisms from genes that have previously been reported to be involved in both degeneration and pain modulation.

Limitations were small sample size, no testing for multiple correction, dichotomy of images of degeneration into moderate and severe rather than using a continuous classification, inclusion of patients with only 1-2 levels involved rather than multi level degeneration and testing by three genetic models on the same data. Furthermore, we have only tested one or few variants from each of these inflammatory genes, thus we could have missed the involvement of genetic variation at each tested gene.

Despite these limitations, our study gives valuable replication of previous findings, support the importance of variation at inflammatory and matrix degrading genes in the degeneration process and LBP and provide hypothesis for future studies. Replication of these results in larger study populations is important for strengthening conclusions from the present study.


This study suggests a role of variation at inflammatory and matrix degrading genes in severity of LDD and pain and disability outcome.



Lumbar disc degeneration


Chronic low back pain


Low back pain


Single-nucleotide polymorphisms


Oswestry disability index


Visual analog score


Extracellular matrix


Matrix metalloproteinase


Linkage disequilibrium.


  1. 1.

    Natvig B, Nessioy I, Bruusgaard D, Rutle O: [Musculoskeletal complaints in a population. Occurrence and localization]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1994, 114 (3): 323-327.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Borenstein DG: Epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of low back pain. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001, 13 (2): 128-134. 10.1097/00002281-200103000-00006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Frymoyer JW: Lumbar disk disease: epidemiology. Instr Course Lect. 1992, 41: 217-223.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Videman T, Battie MC: The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999, 24 (11): 1164-1168. 10.1097/00007632-199906010-00020.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Berlemann U, Gries NC, Moore RJ: The relationship between height, shape and histological changes in early degeneration of the lower lumbar discs. Eur Spine J. 1998, 7 (3): 212-217. 10.1007/s005860050058.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sambrook PN, MacGregor AJ, Spector TD: Genetic influences on cervical and lumbar disc degeneration: a magnetic resonance imaging study in twins. Arthritis Rheum. 1999, 42 (2): 366-372. 10.1002/1529-0131(199902)42:2<366::AID-ANR20>3.0.CO;2-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Eyre DR, Matsui Y, Wu JJ: Collagen polymorphisms of the intervertebral disc. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002, 30 (Pt 6): 844-848.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Solovieva S, Noponen N, Mannikko M, Leino-Arjas P, Luoma K, Raininko R, Ala-Kokko L, Riihimaki H: Association between the aggrecan gene variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism and intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007, 32 (16): 1700-1705. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180b9ed51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Valdes AM, Hassett G, Hart DJ, Spector TD: Radiographic progression of lumbar spine disc degeneration is influenced by variation at inflammatory genes: a candidate SNP association study in the Chingford cohort. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005, 30 (21): 2445-2451. 10.1097/01.brs.0000184369.79744.a5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Videman T, Saarela J, Kaprio J, Nakki A, Levalahti E, Gill K, Peltonen L, Battie MC: Associations of 25 structural, degradative, and inflammatory candidate genes with lumbar disc desiccation, bulging, and height narrowing. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60 (2): 470-481. 10.1002/art.24268.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C: Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012, 379 (9814): 482-491. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Berg S, Tropp HT, Leivseth G: Disc height and motion patterns in the lumbar spine in patients operated with total disc replacement or fusion for discogenic back pain. Results from a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2011, 11 (11): 991-998. 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Karppinen J, Daavittila I, Solovieva S, Kuisma M, Taimela S, Natri A, Haapea M, Korpelainen R, Niinimaki J, Tervonen O: Genetic factors are associated with modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008, 33 (11): 1236-1241. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fd0e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Solovieva S, Kouhia S, Leino-Arjas P, Ala-Kokko L, Luoma K, Raininko R, Saarela J, Riihimaki H: Interleukin 1 polymorphisms and intervertebral disc degeneration. Epidemiology. 2004, 15 (5): 626-633. 10.1097/01.ede.0000135179.04563.35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Takahashi M, Haro H, Wakabayashi Y, Kawa-uchi T, Komori H, Shinomiya K: The association of degeneration of the intervertebral disc with 5a/6a polymorphism in the promoter of the human matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001, 83 (4): 491-495. 10.1302/0301-620X.83B4.11617.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yuan HY, Tang Y, Liang YX, Lei L, Xiao GB, Wang S, Xia ZL: Matrix metalloproteinase-3 and vitamin d receptor genetic polymorphisms, and their interactions with occupational exposure in lumbar disc degeneration. J Occup Health. 2010, 52 (1): 23-30. 10.1539/joh.L8149.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Foulkes T, Wood JN: Pain genes. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4 (7): e1000086-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000086.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hoyland JA, Le Maitre C, Freemont AJ: Investigation of the role of IL-1 and TNF in matrix degradation in the intervertebral disc. Rheumatol (Oxford). 2008, 47 (6): 809-814. 10.1093/rheumatology/ken056.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Le Maitre CL, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA: The role of interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of human intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005, 7 (4): R732-745. 10.1186/ar1732.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dinarello CA: Interleukin-1, interleukin-1 receptors and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Int Rev Immunol. 1998, 16 (5–6): 457-499.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Olee T, Hashimoto S, Quach J, Lotz M: IL-18 is produced by articular chondrocytes and induces proinflammatory and catabolic responses. J Immunol. 1999, 162 (2): 1096-1100.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Puren AJ, Razeghi P, Fantuzzi G, Dinarello CA: Interleukin-18 enhances lipopolysaccharide-induced interferon-gamma production in human whole blood cultures. J Infect Dis. 1998, 178 (6): 1830-1834. 10.1086/314481.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Goupille P, Jayson MI, Valat JP, Freemont AJ: Matrix metalloproteinases: the clue to intervertebral disc degeneration?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998, 23 (14): 1612-1626. 10.1097/00007632-199807150-00021.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kawasaki Y, Xu ZZ, Wang X, Park JY, Zhuang ZY, Tan PH, Gao YJ, Roy K, Corfas G, Lo EH: Distinct roles of matrix metalloproteases in the early- and late-phase development of neuropathic pain. Nat Med. 2008, 14 (3): 331-336. 10.1038/nm1723.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ye S, Eriksson P, Hamsten A, Kurkinen M, Humphries SE, Henney AM: Progression of coronary atherosclerosis is associated with a common genetic variant of the human stromelysin-1 promoter which results in reduced gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (22): 13055-13060. 10.1074/jbc.271.22.13055.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Miyamoto H, Saura R, Doita M, Kurosaka M, Mizuno K: The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002, 27 (22): 2477-2483. 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cipollone F, Toniato E, Martinotti S, Fazia M, Iezzi A, Cuccurullo C, Pini B, Ursi S, Vitullo G, Averna M: A polymorphism in the cyclooxygenase 2 gene as an inherited protective factor against myocardial infarction and stroke. JAMA. 2004, 291 (18): 2221-2228. 10.1001/jama.291.18.2221.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Abraham JE, Maranian MJ, Spiteri I, Russell R, Ingle S, Luccarini C, Earl HM, Pharoah PD, Dunning AM, Caldas C: Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping. BMC Med Genom. 2012, 5 (1): 19-10.1186/1755-8794-5-19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Brox JI, Nygaard OP, Holm I, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Reikeras O: Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010, 69 (9): 1643-1648. 10.1136/ard.2009.108902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Brox JI, Reikeras O, Nygaard O, Sorensen R, Indahl A, Holm I, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Grundnes O, Lange JE: Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled study. Pain. 2006, 122 (1–2): 145-155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Eriksen HR, Holm I, Koller AK: Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003, 28 (17): 1913-1921. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Froholdt A, Holm I, Keller A, Gunderson RB, Reikeraas O, Brox JI: No difference in long-term trunk muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and density in patients with chronic low back pain 7 to 11 years after lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises. Spine J. 2011, 11 (8): 718-725. 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP: The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980, 66 (8): 271-273.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A: 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001, 26 (23): 2521-2532. 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002. discussion 2532-2524

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Buirski G: Magnetic resonance signal patterns of lumbar discs in patients with low back pain. A prospective study with discographic correlation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992, 17 (10): 1199-1204. 10.1097/00007632-199210000-00012.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16 (3): 1215-10.1093/nar/16.3.1215.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (2): 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lewis CM: Genetic association studies: design, analysis and interpretation. Brief Bioinform. 2002, 3 (2): 146-153. 10.1093/bib/3.2.146.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA: Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 70 (2): 425-434. 10.1086/338688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Puren AJ, Fantuzzi G, Dinarello CA: Gene expression, synthesis, and secretion of interleukin 18 and interleukin 1beta are differentially regulated in human blood mononuclear cells and mouse spleen cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96 (5): 2256-2261. 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2256.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cavanaugh JM: Neural mechanisms of lumbar pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995, 20 (16): 1804-1809. 10.1097/00007632-199508150-00011.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Doita M, Kanatani T, Ozaki T, Matsui N, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S: Influence of macrophage infiltration of herniated disc tissue on the production of matrix metalloproteinases leading to disc resorption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001, 26 (14): 1522-1527. 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Rannou F, Corvol MT, Hudry C, Anract P, Dumontier MF, Tsagris L, Revel M, Poiraudeau S: Sensitivity of anulus fibrosus cells to interleukin 1 beta. Comparison with articular chondrocytes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000, 25 (1): 17-23. 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Koskinen LL, Einarsdottir E, Dukes E, Heap GA, Dubois P, Korponay-Szabo IR, Kaukinen K, Kurppa K, Ziberna F, Vatta S: Association study of the IL18RAP locus in three European populations with coeliac disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2009, 18 (6): 1148-1155. 10.1093/hmg/ddn438.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Fantuzzi G, Dinarello CA: Interleukin-18 and interleukin-1 beta: two cytokine substrates for ICE (caspase-1). J Clin Immunol. 1999, 19 (1): 1-11. 10.1023/A:1020506300324.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Haro H, Crawford HC, Fingleton B, MacDougall JR, Shinomiya K, Spengler DM, Matrisian LM: Matrix metalloproteinase-3-dependent generation of a macrophage chemoattractant in a model of herniated disc resorption. J Clin Invest. 2000, 105 (2): 133-141. 10.1172/JCI7090.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Andersson GB: What are the age-related changes in the spine?. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1998, 12 (1): 161-173. 10.1016/S0950-3579(98)80010-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Freemont AJ, Watkins A, Le Maitre C, Baird P, Jeziorska M, Knight MT, Ross ER, O’Brien JP, Hoyland JA: Nerve growth factor expression and innervation of the painful intervertebral disc. J Pathol. 2002, 197 (3): 286-292. 10.1002/path.1108.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Onda A, Yabuki S, Kikuchi S: Effects of neutralizing antibodies to tumor necrosis factor-alpha on nucleus pulposus-induced abnormal nociresponses in rat dorsal horn neurons. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003, 28 (10): 967-972.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Mitsouras K, Faulhaber EA: Saliva as an alternative source of high yield canine genomic DNA for genotyping studies. BMC Res Notes. 2009, 2: 219-10.1186/1756-0500-2-219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Nunes AP, Oliveira IO, Santos BR, Milech C, Silva LP, Gonzalez DA, Hallal PC, Menezes AM, Araujo CL, Barros FC: Quality of DNA extracted from saliva samples collected with the OrageneTM kit DNA self-collection kit. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012, 12 (1): 65-10.1186/1471-2288-12-65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Looi ML, Zakaria H, Osman J, Jamal R: Quantity and quality assessment of DNA extracted from saliva and blood. Clin Lab. 2012, 58 (3–4): 307-312.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


We thank Siri Flåm and Marte Viken at Oslo University Hospital-Ulleval for advice and excellent technical assistance. The Center for interactive genetics; Cigene, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) Aas is thanked for performing Sequenom analysis. The study was funded by the Research Council of Norway with few months’ contribution by the Hansjorg Wyss Research Awards, AO Spine, Davos Switzerland, and we thank them for providing the financial support.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Omair.

Additional information

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AO, BL, OR and JIB contributed to the conception and design and conduction of the study. JIB recruited and examined the patients, provided funding and approvals. MH, AO and BL conducted the statistical analysis. AO drafted the manuscript and all authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omair, A., Holden, M., Lie, B.A. et al. Treatment outcome of chronic low back pain and radiographic lumbar disc degeneration are associated with inflammatory and matrix degrading gene variants: a prospective genetic association study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14, 105 (2013).

Download citation


  • Disc Degeneration
  • Oswestry Disability Index
  • Visual Analog Scale
  • Severe Degeneration
  • Recessive Genetic Model