Low urine pH and acid excretion do not predict bone fractures or the loss of bone mineral density: a prospective cohort study

Osteoporosis is a disease that causes pain, disability, reduced quality of life [1], mortality [2], and places substantial demands on health care budgets [3, 4]. According to the acid-ash hypothesis, the modern diet produces residual acid after metabolism [5–7]. This diet-derived acid is thought to be buffered by bicarbonate from bone, followed by bone calcium excretion in the urine [5–7].

Numerous papers in the medical literature (experimental trials [6–14], cross sectional studies [5, 15], prospective studies [16–19], and animal models [20]) identify the potential acid load of the diet as a risk factor for osteoporosis. Well-respected textbooks [21] and reference works [22, 23] uphold this concept. Of public health importance, the acid-ash hypothesis is marketed to the general public as the "alkaline diet", to decrease acidity, to help the body regulate its pH, and to prevent numerous disease processes. Websites[24, 25], lay literature [26–28], magazine advertisements, and direct mail marketing encourage people to measure their urine pH to assess their risk of osteoporosis as well as their general health status [24, 29]. Urine pH of people consuming modern diets tends to be slightly acidic, with pH of approximately 6 [14, 30]. When urine pH is found to be acidic, the "alkaline diet" and the purchase of products to achieve acid-base balance are advocated.

In the medical literature, the diet acid load has been quantified in food ([sulfate + chloride + 1.8x phosphate + organic acids] minus [sodium + potassium + 2x calcium + 2x magnesium] in mEq/day [10]), as well as in urine [10, 11, 31]. The urine acid load has been quantified in two ways: through the measurement of urine pH [10, 11, 31], and from the measurement of net acid excretion [10, 31–33]. Traditionally the urine acid excretion has been estimated from measured titratable acidity, ammonium and bicarbonate [10, 32], which may be inferior measures of acid excretion since ammonium and bicarbonate are volatile and altered by bacterial growth [34] and the measurement of titratable acidity is not a precise method [35]. Urine measures of food intake or the diet acid load take place after absorption has occurred, are not prone to food intake reporting bias, and therefore may provide more accurate estimates.

To our knowledge, the utility of urine pH and/or urine measures of acid excretion to predict osteoporotic outcomes has not been assessed. If urine pH and urine measures of the potential acid load of the diet can predict which individuals are vulnerable to the development of osteoporosis, a novel laboratory testing strategy could be implemented to identify individuals at risk of accelerated bone loss. However, if these measures do not predict which individuals are vulnerable to osteoporosis, the practice of urine pH testing to identify who is at risk for this disease should be discouraged.

The objectives of this study were to determine whether 1) low urine pH, or 2) the calculated acid excretion in urine predict: a) fragility fractures; and b) five-year change of bone mineral density (BMD) in adults.

This study was approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary and the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMOS) Design, Analysis and Publication Committee. Informed consent was obtained from the study participants at baseline. CaMOS is a prospective population-based cohort study designed to study skeletal health among a random sample of Canadian adults 25 years of age and above [36].The participants in this study included those recruited from Quebec because they had urine and blood samples obtained at both baseline and at 5-years (Figure 1). At baseline (1996-8) and at five years participants had in-person interviews, measurement of BMD, and collection of samples. Fasting urine samples were collected in the morning after an initial void and a wait of two hours, while participants maintained a fast from the evening before. The urine samples were aliquoted, frozen and stored at -70°C in plastic vials within two hours of collection.

The outcome variables for this study were change of BMD (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (Hologic 2000)) over 5-years (at the femoral neck (FN), the lumbar spine (L1-4) (LS), and the total hip (HIP)) as well as fragility fractures over seven years of follow-up. Fractures, initially self-reported, were confirmed using radiology reports, over seven years of follow-up. A fragility fracture occurred spontaneously, after a no-fall injury, or from a fall from a standing height or less.

The exposure variables used in this study were: urine pH, and the concentration of the urine ions (mmol/l) summed as estimated acid excretion ([sulfate + chloride + 1.8x phosphate + estimated organic acids [37]] - [potassium + sodium + 2x calcium + 2xmagnesium] mEq/L) [10] based on measurements made on in fasting morning urine. Urine creatinine was included in the adjusted models to control for urine concentration. The urinary excretion of organic acids (including citric, oxalic, malic, succinic, lactic, glutamic, aspartic acid, etc) were estimated from body surface area ([(body surface area × 41)/1.73] [37], where 41 is the median daily organic acid anion excretion (mEq/d) (body surface area was used by these authors as [0.007184x height (cm)^0.725 × weight (kg)^0.425] [37] based on a recent study that found that anthropometric measures predicted urine organic acids (R² of 0.15 to 0.39) better than diet measures [37].

Immediately after thawing, urine pH was measured using a Radiometer PHM82 Standard pH Meter (Copenhagen, Denmark). The calcium, phosphate and creatinine measurements were made using a Vitros 950 (Vitros Chemistry product, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson Company, Rochester, NY, USA. Sodium, potassium, magnesium, and chloride were measured using Cobas Integra 700 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland). Urine sulfate was measured using an automated methylthymol blue method.

This study revealed no significant associations between either of the urine measures of dietary acid load, urine pH or calculated acid excretion in urine [10], with the occurrence of fragility fractures over 7-years or changes in BMD over 5-years at any of three sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip). The adjusted models are more likely to be accurate estimations of the associations between dietary acid load in fasting morning urine samples and bone outcomes than the unadjusted models since the adjusted models control for other risk factors and confounding [45].

The evidence to support the acid-ash hypothesis of osteoporosis predominantly comes from studies using changes in urine calcium as the outcome [6, 8–12, 46], some prospective observational studies [16, 18, 19, 47] and one randomized trial [13]. Although one randomized trial has supported the hypothesis [13], another did not [40]. The randomized trial [13] supporting the hypothesis did not use concealment of allocation, a study quality indicator for randomized studies that is important to avoid bias during the randomization process [48]. Without concealment of allocation, investigators can influence the allocation of individuals into the treatment groups, invalidating the randomization. Trials that do not have concealed allocation can overestimate effectiveness of a therapy [49]. The more recent randomized trial, that concealed allocation, did not reveal any protective effect of either potassium citrate or increased fruit and vegetable consumption on change in BMD [14].

Three previous prospective cohort studies of the hypothesis reported some protective associations between fruit and vegetable, potassium, and/or vitamin C intakes and bone health [16, 18, 19], and thus may support the hypothesis, while two more recent cohort studies do not support it [50, 51]. One of the positive reporting studies did not see a significant protective association for potassium once potential confounders were controlled [16]. Further, it is possible that the associations in agreement with the hypothesis in the cohort studies were due to uncontrolled confounding by estrogen status [19], baseline BMD [16, 19], change of weight status during follow-up [18], and/or vitamin D status [16, 18, 19, 47].

Further, three recent meta-analyses of the acid-ash hypothesis do not support the hypothesis. First, a meta-analysis of calcium balance studies, restricted to studies of superior methodology, revealed no association between net acid excretion and calcium balance, in spite of the strong relationship between net acid excretion and urinary calcium [52]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of protein intake on bone health revealed a small beneficial effect of protein supplementation on lumbar spine BMD in randomized placebo-controlled trials [53]. Further, the acid-ash hypothesis predicts higher phosphate intakes would be associated with increased urinary calcium and lower calcium balance, but this was not supported by a third recent meta-analysis [54].

We used urine samples that had been stored since baseline. Urine pH may change slightly with storage as carbon dioxide (CO₂) and ammonia (NH₃) evaporate, but the changes are not likely to result in misrepresentation of the measurements. As urine bicarbonate evaporates as CO₂ from alkaline urine (H⁺ and HCO₃ ^- <--> H₂O + CO₂), pH would increase through the loss of the hydrogen ions [55]. As urine ammonia (NH₃) evaporates from more acidic urine, ammonium would converted to ammonia (NH₄ ⁺ <--> H⁺ + NH₃), hydrogen ions would be liberated and therefore the measured hydrogen ion will increase and thus the pH will decrease. Bicarbonate is found in appreciable amounts only in more alkaline urine, and ammonium in more acidic urine [56]. Therefore these reactions, which cause the alkaline urine to become somewhat more alkaline, and acidic urine to become more acidic, would not likely cause misrepresentation of the measurements of the potential risks.

Our study had four strengths. First, the population from which the cohort was selected has wide ranges of intakes for protein, potassium, fruit and vegetables [57, 58]. Therefore the sample likely had a range of exposures, which improve the chances of revealing the relationship under investigation. Second, the outcome measures used in this study, change in BMD (an accepted clinical measure of the progression of this disease [59]) and occurrence of fragility fractures (a direct measure of osteoporosis [60, 61]) are superior measures of osteoporosis relative to the measurement of urine calcium changes. Third, the use of urine to measure the diet acid load allowed us to avoid the random and systematic errors inherent in food intake measurement. Food-based calculations of acid load excretion are not very precise [31], determining food intake is prone to reporting bias [62, 63], and the absorption of individual ions from food is variable [10, 64]. Food is a complex mixture of numerous compounds, and nutrient absorption depends on the chemical composition as well as "on various interactions with many endogenous and exogenous factors" [35].

This study also had limitations. First, the exposures for this study were measured in fasting morning urine samples, which might be inferior to measures made in 24-hour urine samples. It is possible that urine pH or measures of acid excretion in 24-hour urine samples have a relationship with bone outcomes, and it is also possible that fasting-morning-second-void urines are more reliable measures of diet-acid than 24-hour collections that are more prone to incomplete collection [65]. However, proponents of the acid-ash hypothesis advocate the measurement of pH in morning urine to assess osteoporosis risk [24, 27], so we argue the ability to predict osteoporosis in morning urine samples warranted testing. Second, as a cohort study, the risk of confounding remains, and there is a chance of reporting bias for the potential confounding variables.

This study indicates that two measures of acid excretion from fasting morning urine, low urine pH and the calculated acid excretion in urine, do not identify individuals at risk for osteoporosis, as measured using fragility fractures and changes of bone mineral density. This study cannot determine whether the lack of association between these urine measures of diet acid load and bone outcomes is due to the type of urine sample used, the lack of ability of a single measure to reflect long-term diet acid load, or because the acid-ash hypothesis is not predictive of bone health. Together, this study, the recent critical review [66], and recent meta-analyses [52–54] provide a body of contradicting evidence for the acid-ash hypothesis. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of the role of diet in prevention of osteoporosis and to provide the best possible evidence to support or refute marketing of novel therapies to influence health.