Skip to main content

Canine ACL rupture: a spontaneous large animal model of human ACL rupture

Abstract

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in humans is a common condition associated with knee pain, joint instability, and secondary osteoarthritis (OA). Surgical treatment with an intraarticular graft provides reasonable outcomes at mid and long-term follow-up. Non-modifiable and modifiable factors influence risk of ACL rupture. The etiology, mechanobiology, causal biomechanics, and causal molecular pathways are not fully understood. The dog model has shared features of ACL rupture that make it a valuable spontaneous preclinical animal model. In this article, we review shared and contrasting features of ACL rupture in the two species and present information supporting spontaneous canine ACL rupture as a potentially useful preclinical model of human ACL rupture with a very large subject population.

Results

ACL rupture is more common in dogs than in humans and is diagnosed and treated using similar approaches to that of human patients. Development of OA occurs in both species, but progression is more rapid in the dog, and is often present at diagnosis. Use of client-owned dogs for ACL research could reveal impactful molecular pathways, underlying causal genetic variants, biomechanical effects of specific treatments, and opportunities to discover new treatment and prevention targets. Knowledge of the genetic contribution to ACL rupture is more advanced in dogs than in humans. In dogs, ACL rupture has a polygenetic architecture with moderate heritability. Heritability of human ACL rupture has not been estimated.

Conclusion

This article highlights areas of One Health research that are particularly relevant to future studies using the spontaneous canine ACL rupture model that could fill gaps in current knowledge.

Peer Review reports

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common condition associated with knee pain and life-changing loss of function. The estimated incidence in humans is ~ 13.5–75/100,000 persons per year [1]. Primary ligament repair has historically proven unsuccessful and current surgical treatment involves ACL graft reconstruction, although there is recent growing interest in a bridge-enhanced primary repair technique [2, 3]. There is a ~ 50% risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) after ACL rupture that is not influenced by surgical treatment [4]. It has been recognized for many years that familial predisposition to ACL rupture exists [5].

Animal models are important for investigating biological mechanisms and developing new treatments. Dogs, goats, sheep, pigs, and rabbits have all been used as large animal models for ACL research. Readers are referred to Bascuñán et al. for a comparison of the strengths and limitations of these large animal models used for human ACL rupture [6]. Client-owned companion animals that develop disease spontaneously are vital to One Health research. One Health is the intersection of human health, animal health and their shared environment which considers shared risk factors, biology, and disorders while also recognizing the impact of important differences. Shared environment and high prevalence of spontaneous cranial cruciate ligament rupture makes the client-owned dog a widely accessible preclinical animal model of human ACL research.

The morphology of the canine stifle (knee), including the cruciate ligament complex consisting of the cranial (anterior) and caudal (posterior) cruciate ligaments (PCL), and the meniscal cartilages [7] is proportionally like the human knee. An intercondylar notch (ICN) and posterior tibial slope (PTS) is present in both species. For consistency, human anatomic terminology will be used to describe both species in this article.

Initially considered a traumatic injury in dogs, it is now accepted that mid-substance ACL rupture is a consequence of progressive fiber damage [8]. In dogs, ACL rupture incidence is up to ~ 2610/100,000 dogs per year in high-risk breeds (e.g., Newfoundland, Rottweiler, Labrador Retriever, Bulldog and Boxer) [9, 10]. In 1973, experimental ACL transection was performed in laboratory dogs as a model of OA [11]. However, artificially induced ACL transection models may not completely replicate the biological environment and pathologic tissue changes associated with spontaneous disease.

Canine ACL rupture has a similar natural history to the human condition, as meniscal damage and OA typically develop [12,13,14] (Table 1). Incomplete or partial ACL rupture occurs in both species [15, 16]. Specific operative techniques for surgical treatment differ in humans and dogs [17, 18]. Clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, and treatment for both species are summarized in Table 2. This review aims to highlight shared features of ACL rupture between the two species and underscore possible research opportunities where this model could be used to close gaps in knowledge, particularly regarding genetics, development of post-traumatic OA, and non-surgical treatment of ACL rupture and knee OA.

Table 1 Epidemiology, etiology, and pathology of canine and human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture
Table 2 Clinical, radiographic and treatment parameters for canine and human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture

Comparative anatomy

The canine and human knee has comparable intraarticular features, including the ACL, PCL, ICN, femoral condyles, menisci, and tibial plateau (Fig. 1). The infrapatellar fat pad and the synovium surrounding the cruciate ligaments provide a similar rich vascular envelope [19, 20]. The anterolateral ligament (ALL) is absent in the dog.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Anatomical features of the dog and human knee. A, The right knee of a dog. C, D The right knee of a human. Anatomic features including an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), infrapatellar fat pad (IFP), lateral and medial femoral condyles (MFC) and lateral and medial menisci are similar. An important difference between the dog and human knee is the lack of an anterolateral ligament (ALL) in the dog. A Medial femoral pouch (**). In B, the view laterally was improved by transecting the long digital extensor (LDE) tendon

The primary biomechanical function of the ACL is to resist anterior tibial translation, internal tibial rotation, and hyperextension [19, 21]. The anteromedial bundle of the human ACL is taut during flexion [22] while in the dog the anteromedial bundle is taut during extension [23]. ACL tensile properties are similar in both species with comparable mean ultimate loads (2160 ± 157 N) in humans and (1867 ± 324 N) dogs [24, 25] despite a smaller body size. ACL stiffness is also similar in humans (242 ± 28 N/mm) and dogs (201 ± 41 N/mm) [24, 25].

Tibial plateau morphology in quadrupeds and bipeds is different. An osteological study reported mean PTS of 6.9 ± 3.7° along the medial condyle and 4.7 ± 3.6° along the lateral condyle in humans [26]. In dogs, PTS 24.0 ± 3.2° medially and 25.5 ± 3.8° laterally [27]. A more flexed standing angle at the knee is found in dogs and a higher PTS such that functional PTS is parallel to the ground [28]. A limitation to the canine ACL model is the dog’s flexed weight-bearing knee may not precisely model the same high compressive forces experienced in a weight-bearing extended human knee due to differences in gait biomechanics and anatomy.

Research opportunities

Progressive degradation of ACL biomechanical properties as incomplete ACL rupture develops could be an important area of future research.

Etiology

In humans, approximately 70% of ruptures arise from non-contact injury typically after a sudden change in velocity and direction with a planted foot [29]. The proportion of non-contact ruptures in dogs is higher (~ 99% of cases). ACL rupture occurs when plastic tissue damage occurs from excessive loading. Rupture risk is influenced by ACL structure, composition and biomechanics, knee anatomy, and modifiable factors. It is now recognized that repeated submaximal knee loading with subfailure fiber rupture developing gradually over time explains some ruptures in humans [30] like dogs.

Incomplete ACL ruptures represent 10–27% of cases in humans [31], with similar OA progression to that of complete ACL rupture [32]. In the dog, incomplete ACL rupture typically progresses to complete rupture with an unstable knee [33].

Human patients with an ACL rupture are twice as likely than individuals without ACL rupture, to have a relative with ACL rupture [5], but heritability has not been determined. In dogs, ACL rupture is moderately heritable [34].

Research opportunities

Current knowledge suggests that development of subfailure fiber rupture and the associated inflammatory response within the knee joint is another important area for future comparative research. Knowledge of the genetics of canine ACL rupture is much advanced relative to human ACL rupture and translational genetic studies represent another substantial research opportunity.

Non-modifiable factors

Age

In humans, ACL rupture risk is increased in adolescents and young adults [29]. In the Labrador Retriever, peak age of onset is 4 years with few dogs presenting over the age of 8 years [35]. Large breed dogs and dogs with bilateral ACL ruptures present at a younger age [9, 36, 37].

Sex and hormonal factors

In humans, young female athletes are at highest risk of ACL rupture, including contralateral ACL rupture [29]. Sex hormone effects on knee valgus and anterior-posterior laxity may influence risk of injury. Estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors are found on human ACL fibroblasts [38, 39]. Androgen receptors have also been identified in canine ACL fibroblasts [40]. Increasing estrogen and ACL laxity in the preovulatory phase may influence knee valgus and external rotation and associated ACL strains in women [41]. However, women often present with ACL ruptures during the early follicular and late luteal phase with low estrogen and progesterone [42]. ACL rupture risk in dogs is increased by ovariohysterectomy or castration [43]. Prevalence of ACL rupture is higher in neutered dogs, particularly when neutered at a young age [36]. In dogs, neutering may influence PTS [44].

ACL physiology and size

A smaller ACL volume is associated with increased risk of ACL rupture in men [45]. A larger ACL volume is correlated with higher ligament yield load and higher load to failure in dogs [46]. High-risk breeds have higher laxity, higher collagen turnover, lower enthalpy of denaturation and smaller collagen fibril diameters [47, 48], but ACL cross-sectional area is like low-risk breeds [47].

Intercondylar notch

Within the femoral ICN, the ACL and PCL twist around each other. A stenotic ICN may cause ACL impingement and promote fiber rupture [49], with associated increased risk of ACL rupture in both species [49, 50]. In women, decreased ICN width is a risk factor for ACL rupture and graft rupture [45]. In high-risk dog breeds, ACL impingement by the ICN is associated with increased collagen remodeling and reduced ACL structural integrity [49]. However, in a study of Labrador Retrievers, ICN stenosis did not contribute to risk of canine ACL rupture in vivo [51].

Proximal tibial morphology

Studies in humans and dogs have shown that a higher PTS increases ACL load when larger axial compression forces are applied [52, 53]. In humans, increased PTS influences risk of both ACL rupture and ACL graft rupture [54]. In dogs, higher PTS also contributes to risk of ACL rupture [51] and matrix degeneration in the ACL over time [55]. A small relative tibial tuberosity width in dogs also increases ACL rupture risk [56].

Axial rotation at the hip and knee

In humans, limited internal rotation at the hip increases peak ACL strain during pivot landings [30]. Dynamic alignment characterized by hip adduction, internal rotation, and increased knee abduction increases risk of ACL rupture in females [57]. In dogs, increased internal femoral torsion increases risk of ACL rupture [58].

Neuromuscular factors

Develop of muscle fatigue includes hamstring reflex responses in women, but not men, and leads to increased anterior-posterior tibial translation [59]. In dogs, quadriceps atrophy may lead increased anterior tibial thrust [60].

Quadriceps angle and patellar tendon angle

In humans, the quadriceps angle (QA) is larger in females [61] and is weakly associated with increased risk of ACL rupture. In dogs, QA does not influence risk of ACL rupture [58]. Patellar tendon tibial shaft angle in humans is also a moderate predictor of ACL injury [62], and similar effects on ACL rupture risk in dogs may exist [63].

Genetic risk

Genetic risk influences the pathological mechanisms that lead to ACL rupture, but specific linkages are not defined. Humans with ACL rupture are twice as likely as control subjects to have a family member with ACL rupture [5]. Family members of bilateral ACL rupture patients have increased risk [64].

Candidate gene studies have implicated genes that influence ligament matrix properties [65]. Genetic effects that increase ligament laxity, reduce strength, promote fibroblast apoptosis, promote abnormal matrix remodeling, or influence synovial sheath inflammatory responses may all influence injury risk. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified ACL rupture candidate variants [66, 67]. Human ACL rupture heritability has not been estimated.

In high-risk dog breeds, ACL rupture is moderately heritable with a polygenic architecture [34]. Interestingly, Type I (COL1A1) and Type V collagen (COL5A1), and the large proteoglycan, aggrecan (ACAN), have been identified as risk genes in both species [34, 68,69,70,71].

Research opportunities

The epidemiology of non-modifiable risk factors has several shared features in humans and dogs such as internal femoral torsion/rotation and several areas of difference between the two species. Comparative research opportunities appear more limited in this area except for genetic research, where several ACL rupture risk genes that are shared between the two species have been identified to date. As larger epidemiological data sets become available, this may clarify the role of specific risk factors in the two species, such as relative tibial tuberosity width.

Modifiable factors

Environmental factors

Environmental factors have not commonly been shown to be different between sexes [72]. In dogs, there are no specific data that suggest increased ACL rupture risk from a particular terrain [73].

Activity and neuromuscular training

Recent efforts to develop neuromuscular training programs for human athletes have shown promise in lowering ACL rupture rates [74]. Habitual activity is not a risk factor for ACL rupture in Labrador Retrievers, a high-risk breed [73].

Body mass index

Greater body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for human ACL injury in some studies, especially when combined with increased PTS [75]. Obesity in dogs increases ACL rupture risk (OR ~ 2.1–3.8) [76, 77].

Research opportunities

Obesity is common in both humans and dogs and interactions between BMI and ACL rupture risk could represent another area of research that needs more investigation.

Clinical presentation

Patient history and physical examination

Humans with ACL rupture typically present with knee pain, swelling, instability, and hemarthrosis. Increased anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation is often present [78]. The Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot-shift tests are used to assess instability [79]. Dogs with ACL rupture typically present with lameness after a non-contact incident associated with normal activity. In dogs, limb muscle atrophy, knee effusion, medial periarticular fibrosis, and palpable anterior-posterior and internal rotational laxity are common findings [80]. Approximations of the Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot-shift tests that are used in humans are also used to evaluate knee instability in dogs [80]. Knee fibrosis may reduce palpable joint laxity. In both species, anterior translation of the tibia with an ill-defined endpoint is indicative of ACL rupture. Anterior tibial translation while walking in ACL deficient dogs (~ 9.7-10 mm) is much greater than in ACL deficient humans (~ 3 mm) [78, 81].

Diagnostic imaging

Knee radiography is more sensitive than palpation for detection of effusion and OA. Avulsion fractures at ligament attachments may occur in both species. In dogs, subtle radiographic change may be present with obvious synovitis (Fig. 2). Radiographic knee effusion and OA predict progression of ACL rupture from incomplete to complete in dogs [33].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Radiographic features of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in the dog and human. A,B Lateral and anterior-posterior (AP) views of the right knee of a dog with anterior crucitate ligament (ACL) rupture and palpable laxity. The presence of knee joint effusion (#), osteophytes (*) and some degree of intercondylar notch narrowing (arrow) are typical at diagnosis. C,D Lateral and AP radiographs of the right knee of a human demonstrating joint effusion (#). Secondary OA typically develops after ACL rupture in humans

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the best method for identifying ACL fiber tearing in both species, with isotropic 3 T sequences being advantageous [82]. Both humans and dogs with incomplete ACL ruptures have MR signal changes associated with fiber tearing (Fig. 3) that may not be detectable by physical examination, as well as signal changes in the synovium, meniscus, and subchondral bone [31, 82, 83].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of incomplete and complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in the dog and human. Both humans and dogs can present with incomplete or complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. A Sagittal proton density fast spin echo (FSE) magnetic resonance (MR) image of a stable canine knee with incomplete ACL rupture (arrow). B Sagittal T2 FSE CUBE image of a complete canine ACL rupture (arrow). In humans, incomplete ACL rupture develops gradually with subfailure fiber rupture similar to the dog. C Sagittal MR imaging illustrating incomplete human ACL rupture (arrow). D T2-weighted MR sagittal sequence demonstrating mid-substance complete ACL rupture (arrow). Images A and B in Fig. 3 are reproduced with permission from Wiley [82]

Bone bruises identified by MR imaging are associated with ACL rupture in both species [84, 85]. Humans with ACL rupture often have bruising of femoral and tibial subchondral bone suggesting that landing on an extended knee with a flexion angle near full extension with increased valgus, internal tibial rotation, and anterior tibial translation is a risk factor for ACL rupture [84]. In dogs, bone bruises often occur by the intercondylar notch and the tibial eminences, likely reflecting high ACL strains [85].

Intraarticular findings from the knee joint

In both species with suspected incomplete ACL rupture, arthroscopy typically confirms fiber rupture (Fig. 4) [31, 86]. In additional to ipsilateral knee synovitis, contralateral knee synovitis is often present in dogs [86]. PCL fiber rupture is often identified in dogs with incomplete or complete ACL rupture [86]. Softening and fibrillation of hyaline articular cartilage with osteophyte formation and meniscal damage is common in both humans and dogs with complete ACL rupture [86, 87]. Chondroid metaplasia and matrix degeneration of the ACL is similar in both species [88, 89].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Intraarticular findings associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in the dog and human. A-D Arthroscopic views of the intercondylar notch (ICN) in dogs with anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ACL) (*). Fiber rupture often involves specific fiber bundles in the anteromedial bundle of the ACL (*). Associated synovitis is present (arrow). B Fiber rupture and splitting (arrow) of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is also common. C With progressive fiber rupture, associated synovitis reflects hypertrophy, vascularity and inflammatory changes. The healing response in fiber bundles (*) is not successful. D View of the tibial attachment of a complete ACL rupture. A marked healing response in ruptured fiber bundles (*) leads to enlargement of ruptured fiber bundles. E-H Arthroscopic views of a human knee with ACL rupture. E The femoral ICN containing both ACL and PCL as they twist around each other with overlying synovium (arrow) is similar to dogs. Both species develop an associated synovial inflammatory response. F PCL fiber rupture (arrow) with adjacent synovitis and hemorrhage (#). G The ACL rupture can be seen with few fibers remaining attached to the femur (arrow) with synovitis (#) overlying the PCL. H The blunted end of ruptured ACL fibers at the tibial attachment, similar to the dog

Research opportunities

Studies of the progression of fiber rupture in patients with incomplete ACL rupture is limited in humans. The frequency and degree of PCL fiber rupture in human patients with ACL rupture is currently a gap in knowledge. The spontaneous canine ACL rupture model could provide new opportunities to advance fundamental knowledge of the pathogenesis of incomplete ACL rupture, particularly through serial imaging studies. Serial MR imaging could shed new light on development of bone bruises in ACL rupture patients. Such research would be further enhanced by associated molecular analyses of synovial fluid and cruciate ligament tissue.

Treatment

The mainstay of conservative treatment is a regimented physical therapy program and medical management of OA. Canine ACL rupture and knee OA creates the opportunity for large animal model testing of intraarticular biological products [90].

Human and veterinary orthopaedic surgeons have used numerous surgical treatments for ACL rupture. In humans, primary repair and reconstruction have been the main intraarticular techniques. Recent research of bridge-enhanced primary repair for incomplete and complete ACL ruptures in humans has become more prevalent due to interest in lowering incidence of posttraumatic OA and preservation of native tissue proprioceptive and biomechanical function [2, 3]. Primary ACL repair in dogs often results in ACL laxity, fiber loss and OA [91]. ACL repair with an intraarticular graft has been used in both species but is rarely used in dogs currently because of poor outcomes, which is a limitation of the spontaneous canine ACL rupture model. Challenges with graft mechanical strength and fixation, cellular ingrowth, knee loading after surgery, disruption of ligament blood supply, and exposure to synovitis likely explain this difference.

A high tibial osteotomy or tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) to reduce PTS offers the best outcome in dogs [18]. Humans with failed ACL reconstruction and PTSs > 13° may also benefit from tibial osteotomy along with ACL repair [92].

Research opportunities

Large populations of client-owned dogs undergo surgical treatment of ACL rupture each year. This animal population is an untapped resource regarding treatment related research, particularly progression of OA and studies of disease-modifying therapy.

Impact on human health

Comparative diagnostic metrics

Most dogs are managed based on physical examination and radiographs. Knee arthroscopy is also commonly performed in humans and dogs. Longitudinal radiography and arthroscopy in dogs are easily accessible for research.

Availability of knee tissues

Knee synovial fluid arthrocentesis in dogs is easy to perform. This creates an opportunity for comparative studies of synovial fluid biomarkers. Identification of a biomarker that is unique to ACL rupture, rather than post-traumatic OA and investigation of molecular pathways of ACL degeneration could be improved through use of canine joint tissues. The shortened lifespan of dogs enables end-of-life studies.

Isolation of specific outcomes associated with surgical technique

Dogs with incomplete ACL ruptures may undergo TPLO for PTS reduction to prevent further ACL fiber rupture [15]. This provides opportunities for studying ligament fiber response and ACL healing. Outcomes of TPLO in dogs could help isolate the long-term impact of PTS reductions on OA progression [15]. Some human patients experience rotational instability after ACL reconstruction [93], which can also be seen in dogs. ALL reconstruction in humans [93] is analogous to extracapsular knee stabilization in dogs, which could be used as an animal model for ALL reconstruction. The role of knee synovitis in graft healing and associated knee laxity in humans is poorly understood. Studies of graft failure in the spontaneous canine ACL rupture model could yield new insight into mechanisms explaining poor graft healing.

Causal genetic variant discovery and genomic prediction of ACL rupture risk

Use of dogs for genetic investigation of human complex disease is advantageous [34]. Longer haplotype blocks allow GWAS to be performed with fewer markers and smaller sample sizes [34]. Development of polygenic risk scoring for ACL rupture risk prediction is enabled by dog studies [94].

Conclusions

Many epidemiological features of ACL rupture are comparable between humans and dogs. Given the high incidence in many different breeds of dog, there is a very large study population available for comparative research. The greatest limitations of the spontaneous canine ACL rupture model are different knee biomechanics related to quadrupedal locomotion and differences in surgical treatment. OA progression is faster in dogs, enabling disease course observation over a shorter time. Sharing of ACL rupture genetic variants with humans has not been specifically investigated to date. Use of client-owned dogs as a preclinical animal model for studies of ACL rupture biology and response to treatment promises advances in translational One Health research.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ACL:

Anterior cruciate ligament

OA:

Osteoarthritis

PCL:

Posterior cruciate ligament

ICN:

Intercondylar notch

PTS:

Posterior tibial slope

ALL:

Anterolateral ligament

QA:

Quadriceps angle

GWAS:

Genome-wide association study

BMI:

Body mass index

TPLO:

Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy

IFP:

Infrapatellar fat pad

MFC:

Medial femoral condyle

LDE:

Long digital extensor

AP:

Anterior-posterior

MR:

Magnetic resonance

FSE:

Fast spin echo

References

  1. Nicholls M, Aspelund T, Ingvarsson T, Briem K. Nationwide study highlights a second peak in ACL tears for women in their early forties. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:648–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4807-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gobbi A, Whyte GP. Long-term outcomes of primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament combined with biologic healing augmentation to treat incomplete tears. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:3368–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518805740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray MM, Fleming BC, Badger GJ, BEAR Trial Team, Freiberger C, Henderson R, et al. Bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair is not inferior to autograph anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2 years: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020;28:1305–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520913532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequences of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1756–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0363546507307396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flynn RK, Pedersen CL, Birmingham TB, Kirkley A, Jackowski D, Fowler PJ. The familial predisposition toward tearing the anterior cruciate ligament: a case control study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:23–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0363546504265678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bascuñán AL, Biedrzycki A, Banks SA, Lewis DD, Kim SE. Large animal models for anterior cruciate ligament research. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Proffen BL, McElfresh M, Fleming BC, Murray MM. A comparative anatomical study of the human knee and six animal species. Knee. 2012;19:493–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett D, Tennant B, Lewis DG, Baughan J, May C, Carter S. A reappraisal of anterior cruciate ligament disease in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1988;29:275–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Engdahl K, Emanuelson U, Hoglund O, Bergstrom A, Hanson J. The epidemiology of cruciate ligament rupture in an insured Swedish dog population. Sci Rep. 2021;11:9546. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88876-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Witsberger TH, Villamil JA, Schultz LG, Hahn AW, Cook JL. Prevalence of and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;232:1818–24. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.232.12.1818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pond MJ, Nuki G. Experimentally-induced osteoarthritis in the dog. Ann Rheum Dis. 1973;32:387–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.32.4.387.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. van Meer BL, Oei EH, Meuffels DE, van Arkel ERA, Verhaar JAN, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, et al. Degenerative changes in the knee 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and related risk factors: a prospective observational follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1524–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0363546516631936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayes GM, Langley-Hobbs SJ, Jeffery ND. Risk factors for medial meniscal injury in association with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. J Small Anim Pract. 2010;51:630–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2010.01003.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Innes JF, Costello M, Barr FJ, Rudorf H, Barr AR. Radiographic progression of osteoarthritis of the canine stifle joint: a prospective study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004;45:142–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04024.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barger B, Piazza A, Muir P. Treatment of stable partial cruciate rupture (grade 1 sprain) in five dogs with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Rec Case Rep. 2016;4:e000315. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreccr-2016-000315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fayard J-M, Sonnery-Cottet B, Vrgoc G, O’Loughlin P, de Mont D, Marin G, et al. Incidence and risk factors for a partial anterior cruciate ligament tear progressing to a complete tear after nonoperative treatment in patients younger than 30 years. Orthop. J Sports Med. 2019;7:2325967119856624. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F2325967119856624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD005960. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005960.pub2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bergh MS, Sullivan C, Ferrell CL, Troy J, Budsberg SC. Systematic review of surgical treatments for cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2014;50:315–21. https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Rooster H, de Bruin T, van Bree H. Morphologic and functional feature of the canine cruciate ligaments. Vet Surg. 2006;35:769–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00221.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scapinelli R. Studies on the vasculature of the human knee joint. Acta Anat (Basel). 1968;70:305–31. https://doi.org/10.1159/000143133.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ES. Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:259–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zantop T, Petersen W, Sekiya JK, MusahlV FFH. Anterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function related to anatomical reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:982–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0076-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanegashima K, Edamura K, Akita Y, Yamazaki A, Yashukawa S, Seki M, et al. Functional anatomy of the craniomedial and caudolateral bundles of the cranial cruciate ligament in beagle dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2019;32:182–91. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1678711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, Lyon RM, Taki S. Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex. The effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:217–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F036354659101900303.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Toyama H, Renstrom PA, Arms SW, Fischer RA. The relationship between anterior-posterior knee laxity and the structural properties of the patellar tendon graft: a study in canines. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:812–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F036354659402200613.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinberg DS, Williamson DF, Gebhart JJ, Knapik DM, Voos JE. Differences in medial and lateral posterior tibial slope; an osteological review of 1090 tibiae comparing age, sex, and race. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:106–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0363546516662449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sabanci SS, Ocal MK. Lateral and medial tibial plateau angles in normal dogs. An osteological study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2014;27:135–40. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-13-04-0043.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilke VL, Conzemius MG, Besancon MF, Evans RB, Ritter M. Comparison of tibial plateau angle between clinically normal greyhounds and Labrador retrievers with and without rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;221:1426–9. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2002.221.1426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: part 1, mechanisms and risk factors. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0363546505284183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wojtys EM, Beaulieu ML, Ashton-Miller JA. New perspectives on ACL injury: on the role of repetitive sub-maximal knee loading in causing ACL fatigue failure. J Orthop Res. 2016;34:2059–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23441.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Colombet P, Dejour D, Panisset J-C, Siebold R. French arthroscopy society. Current concept of partial anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:S109–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.09.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson VL, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Hunter DJ. Comparison in knee osteoarthritis joint damage patterns among individuals with an intact, complete and partial anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017;20:1361–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chuang C, Ramaker MA, Kaur S, Csomos RA, Kroner KT, Bleedorn JA, et al. Radiographic risk factors for contralateral rupture in dogs with unilateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture. PLoS One. 2014;9:e0106389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106389.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baker LA, Kirkpatrick B, Rosa GJM, Gianola D, Valente B, Sumner JP, et al. Genome-wide association analysis in dogs implicates 99 loci as risk variants for anterior cruciate ligament rupture. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173810.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Reif U, Probst CW. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in normal and cranial cruciate deficient stifles of Labrador retrievers. Vet Surg. 2003;32:385–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2003.50047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Duval JM, Budsberg SC, Flo GL, Sammarco JL. Breed, sex, and body weight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in young dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999;215:811–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grierson J, Asher L, Grainger K. An investigation into risk factors for bilateral canine cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2011;24:192–6. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-10-03-0030.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu SH, Al-Shaikh R, Panossian V, Yang RS, Nelson SD, Soleiman N, et al. Primary immunolocalization of estrogen and progesterone target cells in the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:526–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100140405.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamlet WP, Liu SH, Panossian V, Finerman GA. Primary immunolocalization of androgen target cells in the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:657–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100150505.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ohno H, Goto S, Owaki M, Phta J, Nakajima N, Nakata K, et al. Immunohistochemical study on androgen receptors in the anterior cruciate ligament in dogs. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2013;90:31–9. https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj.90.31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Balachandar V, Marciniak JL, Wall O, Balachandar C. Effects of the menstrual cycle on lower-limb biomechanics, neuromuscular control, and anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017;7:136–46. https://doi.org/10.11138/mltj/2017.7.1.136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Slauterbeck JR, Fuzie SF, Smith MP, Clark RJ, Xu K, Starch DW, et al. The menstrual cycle, sex hormones, and anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Athl Train. 2002;37:275–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Torres de la Riva G, Hart BL, Farver TB, Oberbauer AM, McV Messan LL, Willits N, et al. Neutering dogs: effects on joint disorders and cancers in Golden retrievers. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055937.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Duerr FM, Duncan CG, Savicky RS, Park RD, Egger EL, Palmer RH. Risk factors for excessive tibial plateau angle in large-breed dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;231:1688–91. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.231.11.1688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sturnick DR, Vacek PM, DeSarno MJ, Gardner-Morse MG, Tourville TW, Slauterbeck JR, et al. Combined anatomic factors predicting risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury for males and females. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:839–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514563277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Racette M, Al Saleh H, Waller KR III, et al. 3D FSE Cube and VIPR-aTR 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging predicts canine cranial cruciate ligament structural properties. Vet J. 2016;209:150–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Comerford EJ, Tarlton JF, Innes JF, Johnson KA, Amis AA, Bailey AJ. Metabolism and composition of the canine anterior cruciate ligament relate to differences in knee joint mechanics and predisposition to ligament rupture. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:61–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.05.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Comerford EJ, Tarlton JF, Wales A, Bailey AJ, Innes JF. Ultrastructural differences in cranial cruciate ligaments from dogs of two breeds with a differing predisposition to ligament degeneration and rupture. J Comp Pathol. 2006;134:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2005.06.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Comerford EJ, Tarlton JF, Avery NC, Bailey NC, Innes JF. Distal femoral intercondylar notch dimensions and their relationship to composition and metabolism of the canine anterior cruciate ligament. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2006;14:273–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.09.001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zeng C, Gao SG, Wei J, Yang TB, Cheng L, Luo W, et al. The influence of the intercondylar notch dimensions on injury of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:804–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2166-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW, Constable PD. Morphometric characteristics of the pelvic limbs of Labrador retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Vet Res. 2009;70:498–507. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.70.4.498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Marouane H, Shirazi-Adl A, Adouni M, Hashemi J. Steeper posterior tibial slope markedly increases ACL force in both active gait and passive knee joint under compression. J Biomech. 2014;47:1353–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.055.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ichinoho T, Yamakawa S, Shimada M, Kanno N, Fujita Y, Harada Y, et al. Investigation of the effects of excessive tibial plateau angle and changes in load on ligament tensile forces in the stifle joints of dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2021;82:459–66. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.82.6.459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lee CC, Youm YS, Cho SD, Jung SH, Bae MH, Park SJ, et al. Does posterior tibial slope affect graft rupture following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arthroscopy. 2018;34:2152–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ichinohe T, Kanno N, Harada Y, Yogoo T, Tagawa M, Hara Y. Histological and immunohistological analysis of degenerative changes in the cranial cruciate ligament in a canine model of excessive tibial plateau angle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2015;28:240–9. https://doi.org/10.3415/vcot-14-08-0128.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Inauen R, Koch D, Bass M, Haessig M. Tibial tuberosity conformation as a risk factor for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22:16–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schilaty ND, Bates NA, Nagelli C, Krych AJ, Hewett TE. Sex-based differences in knee kinetics with anterior cruciate ligament strain on cadaveric impact simulations. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6:2325967118761037. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118761037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ragetly CA, Evans R, Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ. Multivariate analysis of morphometric characteristics to evaluate risk factors for cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in Labrador retrievers. Vet Surg. 2011;40:327–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2010.00787.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Behrens M, Mau-Moeller A, Wasserman F, Plewka A, Bader R, Bruhn S. Repetitive jumping and sprinting until exhaustion alters hamstring reflex responses and tibial translation in males and females. J Orthop Res. 2015;33:1687–92.

  60. Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW, Constable PD. Morphometric characteristics of the pelvic limb musculature of Labrador retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Surg. 2010;39:380–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22935.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Horton MG, Hall TL. Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: Normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. Phys Ther. 1989;69:897–901. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/69.11.897.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Suprasanna K, Chamala T, Kumar A. Comparison of anatomical risk factors for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury using magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;10:143–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Schwandt CS, Bohorquez-Vanelli A, Tepic S, Hassig M, Dennler R, Vezzoni A, et al. Angle between the patellar ligament and tibial plateau in dogs with partial rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67:1855–60. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.67.11.1855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Harner CD, Paulos LE, Greenwald AE, Rosenberg TD, Cooley VC. Detailed analysis of patients with bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659402200107.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kaynak M, Nijman F, van Meurs J, Reijam M, Meuffels DE. Genetic variants and anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2017;47:1637–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0678-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Caso E, Maestro A, Sabiers CC, et al. Whole-exome sequencing analysis in twin sibling males with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Injury. 2016;47:S41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(16)30605-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kim SK, Nguyen C, Avins AL, Abrams GD. Three genes associated with anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injury: a genome-wide association analysis. Bone Jt Open. 2021;2:414–21. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.26.bjo-2021-0040.r1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Baird AE, Carter SD, Innes JF, Ollier WE, Short AD. Genetic basis of cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) in dogs. Connect Tissue Res. 2014;55:275–81. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008207.2014.910199.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Johnson JS, Morscher MA, Jones KC, Moen SM, Klonk CJ, Jacquet R, et al. Gene expression differences between ruptured anterior cruciate ligaments in young male and female subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:71–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.n.00246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Gibbon A, Raleigh SM, Ribbans WJ, Posthumus M, Collins M, September AV. Functional COL1A1 variants are associated with the risk of acute musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries. J Orthop Res. 2020;38:2290–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24621.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Suijkerbuijk MAM, Ponzetti M, Rahim M, et al. Functional polymorphisms within the inflammatory pathway regulate expression of extracelluar matrix components in a genetic risk dependent model for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22:1219–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sutton KM, Bullock JM. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: differences between males and females. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:41–50. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-21-01-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Terhaar HM, Muir P, Baker LA, Binversie EE, Chi J, Sample SJ. Contribution of habitual activity to cruciate ligament rupture in Labrador retrievers. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2020;33:82–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3399527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Lopes TJA, Simic M, Myer GD, Ford KR, Hewett TE, Pappas E. The effects of injury prevention programs on the biomechanics of landing tasks: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:1492–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517716930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Bojicic KM, Beaulieu ML, Imaizumi Krieger DY, Ashton-Miller JA, Wojtys EM. Association between lateral posterior tibial slope, body mass index, and ACL injury risk. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2325967116688664. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116688664.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Adams P, Bolus R, Middleton S, Moores AP, Grierson J. Influence of signalment on developing cranial cruciate rupture in dogs in the UK. J Small Anim Pract. 2011;52:347–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01073.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lampman TJ, Lund EM, Lipowitz AJ. Cranial cruciate disease: current status of diagnosis, surgery, and risk for disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2003;16:122–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1154-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Defrate LE, Papannagari R, Gill TJ, Mooses JM, Pathare NP, Li G. The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an in vivo imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1240–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506287299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Koster CH, Harmsen AMK, Lichtenberg MC, Bloemers FW. ACL injury: how do the physical examination tests compare? J Fam Pract. 2018;67:130–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Muir P. Physical examination of lame dogs. Compend Cont Ed Pract Vet. 1997;19:1149–61.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tinga S, Kim S, Banks SA, et al. Femorotibial kinematics in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency: a three-dimensional in-vivo fluoroscopic analysis during walking. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1395-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Fazio CG, Muir P, Schaefer SL, Waller KR III. Accuracy of 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging using detection of fiber loss and a visual analog scale for diagnosing partial and complete cranial cruciate ligament ruptures in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2018;59:64–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Van Dyck P, Gielen JL, Vanhoenacker FM, Wouters K, Dossche L, Parizel PM. Stable or unstable tear of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: an MR diagnosis? Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:273–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1169-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Kim SY, Spritzer CE, Utturkar GM, Toth AP, Garrett WE, DeFrate LE. Knee kinematics during noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury as determined from bone bruise location. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2515–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515594446.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Winegardner KR, Scrivani PV, Krotscheck U, Todhunter RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of subarticular bone marrow lesions in dogs with stifle lameness. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007;48:312–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00248.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Bleedorn JA, Greuel EN, Manley PA, Schaefer SL, Markel MD, Holzman G, et al. Synovitis in dogs with stable stifle joints and incipient cranial cruciate ligament rupture: a cross-sectional study. Vet Surg. 2011;40:531–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2011.00841.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Borchers JR, Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Wright RW, et al. Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1889–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511406871.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Murray MM, Martin SD, Martin TL, Spector M. Histological changes in the human anterior cruciate ligament after rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1387–97. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200010000-00004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Hayashi K, Frank JD, Dubinsky C, et al. Histologic changes in ruptured canine cranial cruciate ligament. Vet Surg. 2003;32:269–77. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2003.50023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Muir P, Hans EC, Racette M, Volstad N, Sample SJ, Heaton C, et al. Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells modulate molecular markers of inflammation in dogs with cruciate ligament rupture. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159095.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. O’Donoghue DH, Frank GR, Jeter GL, Johnson W, Zeiders JW, Kenyon R. Repair and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in dogs. Factors influencing long-term result. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:710–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Sonnery-Cottet B, Mogos S, Thaunat M, Archbold P, Fayard JM, Freychet B, et al. Proximal tibial anterior closing wedge osteotomy in repeat revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1873–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514534938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Ferguson D, Cuthbert R, Tibrewal S. The role of anterolateral augmentation in primary ACL reconstruction. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:S389–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.09.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Baker LA, Momen M, Chan K, Bollig N, Brito Lopes F, Rosa GJM, et al. Bayesian and machine learning models for genomic prediction of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the canine model. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10:2619–28. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401244.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Dr. Binversie was supported by a T32 training grant (T32OD010423) from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Walczak was supported by NIH UW T32 AG000213–26, NIH UW TL1 TR000429, NIH UW UL1 TR000427, and UW-Madison Department of Orthopedic Surgery’s Freedom of Movement Award. Dr. Cone was supported by an F32 fellowship (F32AR076267-01A1) from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Baker was supported by a T15 training grant (T15LM007359) from the National Library of Medicine. The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EEB, BAW, and SGC contributed to drafting, writing, and images. LAB, TAS, and PM contributed to drafting and editing. All authors were actively involved during the process of the manuscript development. They all read and approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Muir.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binversie, E.E., Walczak, B.E., Cone, S.G. et al. Canine ACL rupture: a spontaneous large animal model of human ACL rupture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04986-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04986-z

Keywords

  • ACL rupture
  • Human
  • Dog
  • Spontaneous animal model
  • Shared features
  • One Health