Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Biomechanical effect of different plate-to-disc distance on surgical and adjacent segment in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion - a finite element analysis

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 22, Article number: 340 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The plate-to-disc distance (PDD) is an important factor affecting the degeneration of adjacent segments after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the most suitable PDD is controversial. This study examined the adjacent intervertebral disc stress, bone graft stress, titanium plate stress and screw stress to evaluate the biomechanical effect of different PDD on surgical segment and adjacent segment following C5/C6 ACDF.

Methods

We constructed 10 preoperative finite element models of intact C4–C7 segments and validated them in the present study. We simulated ACDF surgery based on the 10 intact models in software. We designed three different distance of plate-to-disc titanium plates: long PDD (10 mm), medium PDD (5 mm) and short PDD (0 mm). The changes in C4/C5 and C6/C7 intervertebral disc stress, bone graft stress, titanium plate stress and screw stress were analyzed.

Results

The von Mises stress of C4/C5 and C6/C7 intervertebral discs had no significant differences (P > 0.05) in three different PDD groups. Titanium plate stress increased as the PDD decreased. The bone graft stress and screws stress decreased as the PDD decreased. The maximum stress of each part occurred was mostly in the conditions of rotation and lateral bending.

Conclusions

The PDD has no effect on adjacent intervertebral disc stress, but it is an important factor that affecting the bone graft stress, titanium plate stress and screws stress after ACDF. Shorter PDD plate can provide better stability to reduce stress on screws and bone graft, which may be helpful to prevent cage subsidence, pseudarthrosis and instrument failure. This can serve as a reference for clinical choice of plate.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cervical spondylosis is an age-related condition of the cervical spine resulting from progressive intervertebral disc degeneration. Approximately 80 to 90% of people have disc degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging by the age of 50 years [1, 2]. Disc degeneration can potentially cause compression of the nerve roots or spinal cord, resulting in radiculopathy (annual incidence of approximately 83/100000) or myelopathy (annual incidence of approximately 4/100000) [3,4,5,6,7]. This can manifest as a range of symptoms, including axial neck pain, radicular pain, motor weakness and sensory loss [1, 4]. For patients unresponsive to appropriate nonsurgical measures for at least 6 months, surgical treatment should be considered [8].

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is considered a standard surgical treatment for affected patients in whom nonsurgical treatments fail [9,10,11]. With the development of surgical instruments and surgical techniques, titanium plate has been routinely used in ACDF surgery. Reasonable use of titanium plate can provide immediate stability in early postoperative period, which can prevent bone graft subsidence, bone graft extrusion and improve fusion rates, and reduce the need for external immobilization [12, 13]. However, it has been reported that the cervical arthrodesis with plate can change the biomechanical environment of cervical spine, eventually result in adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) [14,15,16].

ASD is defined as the degeneration of adjacent level of spine arthrodesis. Previous studies have been reported that the repeat surgery rate of ACDF patients was 17.4% due to symptomatic ASD [17], which seriously affected the patient’s satisfaction with the surgery and increased the economic burden on society. There have been studies suggested that plate-to-disc distance (PDD) [14], graft type [18], and post-operative cervical alignment [19] are factors that affect the incidence of ASD. Among them, PDD is considered to be an important but controversial factor affecting the development of ASD. Chung et al. [14] found most clinical adjacent-segment degeneration appeared on the patients with a PDD less than 5 mm. Hence, they concluded that the PDD should be 5 mm or more if possible for preventing ASD. Yu et al. [20] found that PDD < 5 mm is a risk factor for ASD through logistic regression analysis. However, Yang et al. [21] considered that there is no correlation between PDD and the incidence of ASD. Hence, the appropriate PDD in ACDF still need to studied.

Finite element analysis (FEA) has the ability to simulate a variety of complex body structures in a computer and calculate the pressure and stress of each component without any invasion [22, 23]. FEA also provide time- and cost- effective means to address various what if scenarios, thereby reducing the need for costly experimental animal and cadaveric studies. Untill now, the biomechanical effect of different PDD on adjacent and surgical segments has not been reported through FEA. Hence, the objective of the present study is to analyze the biomechanical effect of different PDD on adjacent intervertebral disc stress, bone graft stress, titanium plate stress and screw stress precisely using quantitative FEA.

Methods

Construction of the C4-C7 finite element models

Ethical approval of this study was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (Tianjin, China). Twenty healthy volunteers were recruited from Tianjin Medical University and imaging data were obtained. The radiological data of these volunteers were reviewed by a senior doctor. Four participants with cervical degeneration or obvious natural variability were excluded. Finally, we randomly selected 10 participants and built 10 three-dimensional finite element (FE) models based on computed tomography (CT) scans with interval 0.625 mm of the cervical spine of these 10 healthy volunteers.

We used the threshold segmentation, region grow, etc. of the MIMICS 21.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) software to establish the primary geometric structures of the C4-C7 cervical vertebraes based on the CT images. Then, a smoothing process was performed in Geomagic Studio 14.0 (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA) to remove spikes and holes on the surface of the vertebral geometries. The 10 smooth models were processed using sketch, extrude, loft, cut, chamfer, etc. of Solidworks 2019 (Dassault Systèmes, Paris, France) to construct structures such as intervertebral discs, ground substance, nucleus pulposus, endplates, cartilages of the articular processes. Then geometric models were imported into Hypermesh 14.0 (Altair, Troy, MI, USA) to construct annulus fibers and ligaments, and mesh. The intervertebral disc was divided into hexahedral meshes. We constructed the annulus fibers by connecting the vertices of the hexahedrons, so the direction and angle of the annulus fibers could be controlled through adjusting the length of each side. At this point, the three-dimensional finite element models have been created. Finally, the boundary conditions and loading conditions of the prepared models were set using ABAQUS 6.9.1 (Dassault Systèmes, Paris, France).

The bony structures of the vertebral body include cortical bone, cancellous bone and posterior structure. The cancellous bone region of the vertebrae was set as solid element. The thick of the cortical bone was 1.5 mm. We created the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus with a volume ratio of 4:6 [24]. Annulus fibers surrounded the ground substance with an inclination to the transverse plane between 15° and 45°, accounting for approximately 19% of the entire annulus fibrosus volume [24]. A bond connection was defined between the face-to-face contact except the cartilages of the articular processes. The cartilages were inserted into the spaces of the bony articular process joints. All cartilages of the articular processes were subjected to a face-to-face frictionless contact with each other [24, 25]. Five groups of ligaments, including the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL), posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL), ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligament and capsular ligament were established using tension-only spring elements and attached to the corresponding vertebrae.

The preoperative C4-C7 FE models and structural details were shown in Fig. 1. The information of ten volunteers was shown in Table 1. The material properties of the FE models are listed in Table 2 and Table 3 [26, 27].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Finite element models of C4–C7 cervical spine and other structures and details. a Frontal view of preoperative model; b Lateral view of preoperative model; c Loading and boundary condition; d Intervertebral disc details; e Vertebral body details

Full size image
Table 1 Demographics of study participants (n = 10)
Full size table
Table 2 The material properties of the spinal soft tissues and hard tissues used in the finite element model
Full size table
Table 3 The material properties of the ligaments
Full size table

Boundary and loading conditions

The bottom endplate of the C7 vertebral body was constrained in all degrees of freedom. The loading process involved two steps. The 73.6 N of axial compression loading were applied at the superior endplate of the C4 vertebral body that represented the head weight. After the FE models stabilized from the axial compression loading, the state was saved and used as an initial condition for the second step. In second step, the conditions loading with 1.0 N·m torque were tested for cervical spine movement directions: flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. The loading conditions were also applied at the superior endplate of the C4 vertebral body. The values of axial compression loading and the torque were obtained from previous published studies [28, 29].

Mesh convergence test

One of the ten FE models (Volunteer 1) was tested for mesh convergence. Three mesh resolutions were generated consecutively (in the order of Mesh 1, Mesh 2, and Mesh 3) for this FE model. Mesh 1 had the smallest number of elements and nodes among the three mesh resolutions. Mesh 2 and Mesh 3 had approximately doubled numbers of elements and nodes than the previous mesh resolution. The number of elements and nodes for each mesh resolution are shown in Table 4. The three mesh resolutions were tested under the same rotation with a moment of 1.0 N·m. The von Mises stress was calculated and compared for different structures in the FE model. When the prediction results obtained by two consecutive mesh resolutions have differences smaller than 5%, the mesh was considered to be convergent [30, 31].

Table 4 Element and node numbers for three different mesh resolutions
Full size table

Validation of the model

The range of motion (ROM) of the C4-C7 FE models were predicted with a pure bending moment of 1.0 N·m for flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending with 73.6 N of axial compression superior to C4, and compared to previous experimental results [32]. If the predicted data were within the standard deviation of the previous literature, the FE model was considered to be validated. To measure the ROM, we established a cross coordinate system on the superior plane of the target vertebral body, and then measured the ROM in different directions according to the changes in the position of the coordinate system after loading.

Surgery simulation

During the actual surgery, the C5/C6 anterior longitudinal ligament, C5/C6 disc, inferior endplate of C5, superior endplate of C6 and C5/C6 posterior longitudinal ligament were resected. We deleted the corresponding structures to simulate the surgery more precisely. The bone graft was assumed bound to the adjacent vertebral body completely. In the present study, three different PDD plates: 0 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm plates and self-tapping screws were simulated. The screws were fixed in parallel to the endplates in all postoperative models. The 10 postoperative models was loaded in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending by imposing a pure moment of 1.0 N·m on C4 with 73.6 N of axial precompression superior to the upper endplate of C4. The lower endplate of C7 was firmly fixed in all degrees of freedom. The postoperative C4-C7 FE models with different PDD plates were shown in Fig. 2. We choose the von Mises stress of adjacent intervertebral disc, the titanium plate, bone graft and screws as the parameters to evaluate mechanical effect of three different PDD plates.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a and b Frontal and lateral view of postoperative model with long PDD titanium plate; c and d Frontal and lateral view of postoperative model with middle PDD titanium plate; e and f Frontal and lateral view of postoperative model with short PDD titanium plate. PDD plate-to-disc distance

Full size image

Statistical analysis

In order to investigate similarities and differences for the von Mises stress of adjacent intervertebral disc, the titanium plate, bone graft and screws among the three groups under flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending loading conditions, we used multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Before MANOVA, Shapiro-Wilk test, colinearity diagnostics and Box’s test were conducted. All data of the three groups were greater than 0.05 in Shapiro-Wilk test, indicating that the data were normally distributed. In colinearity diagnostics, all variance inflation factors were less than 10 and tolerances were greater than 0.1, meaning that no significant multicollinearity existed among the variables. The p values in Box’s test were greater than 0.05, demonstrating the covariance matrices were equal. Then, the MANOVA was conducted. For post hoc test, Tukey method (equal variance assumed) or Games-Howell method (equal variance not assumed) was used. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. All statistical analysis was done with SPSS Version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Characteristics of volunteers

The characteristics of the 10 volunteers are shown in Table 1. The median age of the volunteers is 26 years, ranged from 23 to 29 years. The median height, weight and BMI were 169.50 cm, 63.75 kg and 22.30 kg/m2, respectively.

Mesh convergence test

The percentage differences in von Mises stress of Mesh 1 vs. Mesh 2 and Mesh 2 vs. Mesh 3 are shown in Fig. 3. The differences of von Mises stress between Mesh 2 and Mesh 3 were less than 5% in the model. Hence, Mesh 2 was considered to be stress-converged. All the 10 FE models were meshed in stress converged mesh resolution (Mesh 2 level).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The predicted percentage differences of von Mises stress between Mesh 1 and Mesh 2 and between Mesh 2 and Mesh 3 in different structures for Volunteer 1 in the axial rotation

Full size image

FE model validation

The comparisons between in vitro data and predicted values in the FE models are shown in Table 5 and Fig. 4. All the predicted data in this study occurred within the standard deviation of the mean values of the previous literature [32], meaning the data was in a good agreement with published experimental results. Hence, the FE models can be regarded as validated and could be used in the present study.

Table 5 ROM (°) of each segment under different loading conditions
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

The predicted ROM of the preoperative model was validated by previous published study. All the predicted data in our study occurred within the standard deviation of the mean values of the previous literature. ROM range of motion

Full size image

The von Mises stress in the different structures

The von Mises stress of adjacent intervertebral disc, bone graft, titanium plate and screw under different load in different PDD titanium plate groups are shown in Table 6. The stress cloud diagrams are shown in Figs. 5, 6 and 7. No stress concentration point is found in the figures, indicating that the calculation results are reliable.

Table 6 The von Mises stress of the structures in different lengths of titanium plates
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

The von Mises stress distribution diagram of adjacent intervertebral discs with different PDD titanium plates under different loading conditions (a C4/C5; b C6/C7). PDD plate-to-disc distance

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

The von Mises stress distribution diagram of bone graft with different PDD titanium plates under different loading conditions. PDD plate-to-disc distance

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

The von Mises stress distribution diagram of titanium plate and screw with different PDD titanium plates under different loading conditions. PDD plate-to-disc distance

Full size image

The von Mises stress of adjacent intervertebral disc

The von Mises stress distribution diagram of adjacent intervertebral discs with different PDD titanium plates in different loading conditions are shown in Fig. 5. It can be seen that the PDD had little effect on adjacent intervertebral disc stress distribution. The stress of the nucleus pulposus is smaller than the annulus fibrosus, which may be due to the fact that the stiffness of the annulus fibrosus is greater than that of the nucleus pulposus, so the annulus fibrosus carries more stress. In Table 6, for the upper adjacent segment (C4/C5), no significant differences were found in the von Mises stress of adjacent intervertebral disc among the three different PDD groups in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending loading conditions (P > 0.05). Additionally, for the lower adjacent segment (C6/C7), there was also no statistical difference among the three groups in different loading conditions (P > 0.05).

The von Mises stress of bone graft

The von Mises stress distribution diagram of bone graft with different PDD titanium plates in different loading conditions are shown in Fig. 6. The stress of the bone graft varies with the direction of movement, mainly concentrated on the edge of the bone graft, indicating that it has played a good supporting role. It is obvious that the red stress area of the bone graft gradually decreases as the length of the titanium plate increases. In Table 6, the von Mises stress of bone graft in the three groups were statistically different (P <  0.05). The bone graft stress decreased as the PDD decreased in all different loading conditions.

The von Mises stress of titanium plate

The von Mises stress distribution diagram of titanium plate with different PDD titanium plates in different loading conditions are shown in Fig. 7. The red stress area of the titanium plate gradually increases as the length of the titanium plate increases. In Table 6,a significant difference was found in the von Mises stress of titanium plates among the three different PDD groups (P <  0.05). The stress of titanium plate increased as the PDD decreased in all different loading conditions.

The von Mises stress of screw

The von Mises stress distribution diagram of screws with different PDD titanium plates in different loading conditions are shown in Fig. 7. Although the area of the red stress does not significantly decrease with the increase of the length of the titanium plate, the maximum stress decreases with the increase of the length of the titanium plate and the stress is mainly concentrated on the two screws at the cranial side. In Table 6, a significant difference in the von Mises stress of screws was found in the three different PDD groups (P <  0.05). The screw stress decreased as the PDD decreased in all different loading conditions.

Discussion

ASD as a complication of ACDF has been reported to cause 17.4% of ACDF patients to have to undergo a second surgery [17], which has seriously affected patient’s quality of life and increased the economic burden on families and society.

Various scholars have different opinions regarding PDD and ASD in ACDF. Chung et al. [14] reported that 177 patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical plates, with follow-up periods of at least 10 years. They found most clinical ASD appeared on the patients with a PDD less than 5 mm. So they considered that to prevent ASD, the PDD should be 5 mm or more if possible. In addition, Yu et al. [20] agreed that PDD < 5 mm is a risk factor for ASD by the logistic regression analysis based on 138 patients. However, Yang et al. [21] retrospectively reviewed 218 patients who underwent anterior cervical arthrodesis with plating and considered that there is no correlation between PDD and the incidence of ASD, but PDD > 5 mm could avoid the development of adjacent segment ossification. Therefore, it remains controversial whether different PDD plate will affect the incidence of ASD.

FEA have been widely used for a biomechanical analysis of the cervical spine because they can analyze various results quantitatively without any invasion. In the present study, we constructed 10 three-dimensional finite element C4-C7 models based on cervical CT images of 10 volunteers. Considering that cervical disc lesions mostly occur in the C5/C6 segments, we selected the C5/C6 segment as the surgical segment so that the results could be suitable for more patients.

In our study, no significant differences were found in the adjacent intervertebral disc stress in the three different PDD groups. This result indicates that PDD does not affect the adjacent intervertebral disc stress. It has been reported that excessive loading can induce degeneration of intervertebral discs. So, we can conclude that the titanium plates of different PDD will not promote the degeneration of adjacent segments by increasing the intervertebral disc stress of adjacent segments. This can further validate the clinical findings of Yang et al. [21] that there is no correlation between PDD and the incidence of ASD.

As for the bone graft stress, we found that the bone graft stress decreased as the PDD decreased. This may be related to the fact that the short PDD plate increases the stiffness of the surgical segment and provides better stability. Although the most appropriate stress on bone graft is not clearly, excessive stress on the bone graft may result in fusion failure because of graft dislodgement and endplate fracture [33]. Furthermore, non-fusion is an important reason for the failure of instruments [34]. Considering bone graft stress and fusion rate, shorter PDD plate is safer because that shorter PDD is helpful to prevent bone graft subsidence and instrument failure from a biomechanical point of view.

The stress of titanium plate increased as the PDD decreased, which shows that as the length of the plate increases, the stress increases accordingly. This is due to the longer torque of the long plate. Of course, this result also explains that long titanium plates can carry more stress, which provides better stability. Although the increase of stress of the plate may cause the plate to break, the increase of the plate stress among different PDD groups is not obvious in the average value.

The screw stress decreased as the PDD decreased. As the length of the steel plate increases, the screw stress decreases. This may be caused by that the most of the overall stress is mostly carried by the plate. Screw loosening and breakage are associated with metal fatigue via pseudarthrosis, which were most dangerous complications in cervical anterior plating fixation. So shorter PDD plate plays an important role in preventing screws breakage and loosening. Yang et al. [21] found when the end point of plate violates the adjacent space, the incidence of ASD is the lowest among different PDD groups. They considered that this may be because the formation of ossification improves the stability of adjacent segments. However, they do not advocate the use of plates that can invade adjacent space. Considering that the strength of the screw is weaker than that of the plate [34], we believe that choosing a slightly shorter PDD plate is more conducive to postoperative recovery. Of course, we also don’t recommend that the PDD is so small that violate the adjacent space.

In addition, we find that the maximum stress of each part occurred was mostly in the conditions of rotation and lateral bending, so we recommend that patients should avoid excessive rotation and lateral bending during early postoperative period to prevent screws breakage, fusion failure, endplate fracture and other complications.

In this study, all materials used linear assignment except for ligaments. Obviously, the material properties of the cervical spine are complex. Structures such as intervertebral discs and annulus are non-linear structures and have viscous properties. Although the nonlinear analysis would probably predict the stress and strain within involved structures in a more realistic situation, the linear parameters can also simulate the real situation well in the case of small torque and small deformation. Hence, we used 1 N·m - a small torque to simulate movement in all directions to ensure that the calculation results were closer to the real data. Model built with too many nonlinearities and complex parameters would greatly increase the non-convergence of calculations, so we assign the various structures of the cervical spine linear parameters. The nonlinear properties of ligaments are very important for the study of spinal biomechanics, so we assigned the ligaments non-parametric properties.

The present study has a number of limitations. Muscles and other soft tissue were not constructed in the models, however, these structures are extremely important for spine biomechanics research. In addition, the screws were designed as solid cylinders bound to the cage or plate, and the threads on the screws were not modeled. Some simplifications were carried out in the prosthesis geometry, for example, we simplify the cancellous bone as a solid structure which may affect the distribution and geometric deformation of the load. These limitations lead to the models cannot completely represent actual in vivo conditions after surgery. Hence, the results from these models should be interpreted carefully. This study aims to reflect a tendency rather than actual data and other situations should be considered in future studies. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, few studies of FEA in cervical spine were based on ten or more models. Compared with only one model, ten models in this study could enhance the accuracy of the results. In a word, although completely duplicating the result of in vivo studies in FEA was impossible, this study effectively shows the biomechanical differences among different PDD plate groups. Meanwhile, further studies with more accurate simulation method still are needed to explore the effect of different PDD in ACDF.

Conclusions

The PDD has no effect on adjacent intervertebral discs stress, but it is an important factor that affecting the bone graft stress, titanium plate stress and screw stress after ACDF. Shorter PDD does not affect the incidence of ASD through the increase of the adjacent intervertebral discs stress, but it can provide better stability to reduce stress on screws and bone graft which may be helpful to prevent bone graft subsidence, pseudarthrosis and instrument failure. This can serve as a reference for clinical choice of plate.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to individual privacy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACDF:

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

ALL:

Anterior longitudinal ligament

ASD:

Adjacent segment degeneration

CL:

Capsular ligament

CT:

Computed tomography

FE:

Finite element

FEA:

Finite element analysis

ISL:

Interspinous ligament

LF:

Ligamentum flavum

PDD:

Plate-to-disc distance

PLL:

Posterior longitudinal ligament

ROM:

The range of motion

References

  1. Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, Bresnahan BW, Chen LE, Deyo RA, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):811–6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Teraguchi M, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H, Muraki S, Yamada H, Minamide A, et al. Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degeneration over the entire spine in a population-based cohort: the Wakayama spine study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22(1):104–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grob D. Surgery in the degenerative cervical spine. Spine. 1998;23(24):2674–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199812150-00005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Persson LC, Moritz U, Brandt L, et al. Cervical radiculopathy: pain, muscle weakness and sensory loss in patients with cervical radiculopathy treated with surgery, physiotherapy or cervical collar. A prospective, controlled study. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(4):256–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Polston DW. Cervical radiculopathy. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(2):373–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2007.01.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy W, O'Fallon W, Kurland L. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain J Neurol. 1994;117(Pt 2):325–35.

  7. Wu J, Ko C, Yen Y, et al. Epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its risk of causing spinal cord injury: a national cohort study. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(1):E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS13122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Theodore N. Degenerative cervical spondylosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(2):159–68. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2003558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heidecke V, Rainov NG, Burkert W. Anterior cervical fusion with the Orion locking plate system. Spine. 1998;23(16):1796–802discussion 803. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199808150-00014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tribus CB, Corteen DP, Zdeblick TA. The efficacy of anterior cervical plating in the management of symptomatic pseudoarthrosis of the cervical spine. Spine. 1999;24(9):860–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199905010-00005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow KK, et al. Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine. 2000;25(1):41–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200001010-00009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee CH, Hyun SJ, Kim MJ, Yeom JS, Kim WH, Kim KJ, et al. Comparative analysis of 3 different construct systems for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: stand-alone cage, iliac graft plus plate augmentation, and cage plus plating. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26(2):112–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318274148e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Song KJ, Taghavi CE, Lee KB, Song JH, Eun JP. The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion. Spine. 2009;34(26):2886–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b64f2c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chung JY, Kim SK, Jung ST, Lee KB. Clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results after a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Spine J. 2014;14(10):2290–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine. 2010;35(1):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a80d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang F, Hou HT, Wang P, Zhang JT, Shen Y. Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after single-lever anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: incidence and risk factors. Medicine. 2017;96(47):e8663. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Burkhardt BW, Brielmaier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Sharif S, Oertel JM. Smith-Robinson procedure with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a 26-year follow-up of 23 patients. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(4):1246–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4988-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Samartzis D, Shen FH, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation? Spine. 2005;30(15):1756–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000172148.86756.ce.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(4):320–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860000243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu C, Mu X, Wei J, Chu Y, Liang B. In-depth analysis on influencing factors of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical fusion. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:4902–10. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.902179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang H, Lu X, He H, Yuan W, Wang X, Liao X, et al. Longer plate-to-disc distance prevents adjacent-level ossification development but does not influence adjacent-segment degeneration. Spine. 2015;40(7):E388–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikkhoo M, Hsu YC, Haghpanahi M, Parnianpour M, Wang JL. A meta-model analysis of a finite element simulation for defining poroelastic properties of intervertebral discs. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013;227(6):672–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411913480668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt H, Galbusera F, Rohlmann A, Shirazi-Adl A. What have we learned from finite element model studies of lumbar intervertebral discs in the past four decades? J Biomech. 2013;46(14):2342–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Denoziere G, Ku DN. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 2006;39(4):766–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rong X, Wang B, Ding C, Deng Y, Chen H, Meng Y, et al. The biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the intervertebral disc and facet joints in the cervical spine. Spine J. 2017;17(12):1926–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoganandan N, Kumaresan S, Pintar FA. Biomechanics of the cervical spine part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16:1–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wheeldon JA, Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Validation of a finite element model of the young normal lower cervical spine. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;36(9):1458–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9534-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cai XY, Sang D, Yuchi CX, Cui W, Zhang C, du CF, et al. Using finite element analysis to determine effects of the motion loading method on facet joint forces after cervical disc degeneration. Comput Biol Med. 2020;116:103519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao L, Chen J, Liu J, et al. Biomechanical analysis on of anterior transpedicular screw-fixation after two-level cervical corpectomy using finite element method. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018;60:76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ayturk UM, Puttlitz CM. Parametric convergence sensitivity and validation of a finite element model of the human lumbar spine. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011;14(8):695–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2010.493517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones AC, Wilcox RK. Finite element analysis of the spine: towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30(10):1287–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Panjabi MM, Crisco JJ, Vasavada A, Oda T, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, et al. Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. Spine. 2001;26(24):2692–700. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200112150-00012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ning X, Wen Y, Xiao-Jian Y, Bin N, de-Yu C, Jian-Ru X, et al. Anterior cervical locking plate-related complications; prevention and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop. 2008;32(5):649–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0369-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Song KJ, Choi BW, Ham DH, Kim HJ. Prognosis of hardware-related problems in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage and plate constructs. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:e249–e55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend sincere gratitude to the staff of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery for their assistance during this study.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81871124) and the Key Program of Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 20JCZDJC00310). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xing Guo, Jiaming Zhou and Yueyang Tian contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China

    Xing Guo, Jiaming Zhou, Yueyang Tian, Liang Kang & Yuan Xue

  2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China

    Xing Guo, Jiaming Zhou, Yueyang Tian, Liang Kang & Yuan Xue

Authors
  1. Xing Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiaming Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yueyang Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liang Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuan Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YX and JZ participated in the design of this study. XG, YT, LK carried out the studies and performed the statistical analysis. XG, JZ, YT, and YX drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Xue.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article contains a study with human participants, and the study protocol was approved by the Investigation and Ethics Committee of the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (reference number IRB2019-WZ-145). Informed consent for this study was obtained from all patients by both written and verbal.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, X., Zhou, J., Tian, Y. et al. Biomechanical effect of different plate-to-disc distance on surgical and adjacent segment in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion - a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 340 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04218-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04218-4

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us