Skip to main content
Download PDF

Relationship between trabecular bone score, bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 24, Article number: 316 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In patients with axial spondyloarthritis, vertebral fracture risk is elevated and not always correlated with bone mineral density (BMD). Trabecular bone score (TBS) may offer some advantages in the assessment of vertebral fracture risk in these patients. The primary objective of this study was to compare TBS and BMD between axial spondyloarthritis patients depending on their vertebral fracture status. Secondary objectives were to estimate the prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures, and to explore factors associated with fracture, as well as the interference of syndesmophytes on BMD and TBS.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected on demographic and clinical characteristics, lab results, imaging findings and treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.13 statistical software.

Results

Eighty-four patients (60 men and 24 women; mean age of 59 years) were included. Nearly half (47.6%) of them had lumbar syndesmophytes. The rate of morphometric fracture was 11.9%. TBS showed a higher area under the curve (0.89) than total hip, femoral neck and lumbar BMD (0.80, 0.78, and 0.70 respectively) for classifying patients regarding their fracture status. Nonetheless, the differences did not reach statistical significance.

Syndesmophytes affected lumbar spine BMD (p < 0.001), but not hip BMD or TBS. Fractures were associated with TBS, total hip BMD, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels.

Conclusions

We identified decreased TBS and total hip BMD, as well as increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels as factors associated with morphometric vertebral fractures. Unlike lumbar spine BMD, TBS is not affected by the presence of syndesmophytes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic disease characterized by the involvement of the axial skeleton. In later stages of the disease, a combination of sustained inflammation and structural damage may lead to decreased bone mass and impaired bone microarchitecture, affecting bone strength. An elevated risk of vertebral fracture has been described among patients with axSpA [1], with estimated prevalence rates of morphometric vertebral fracture as high as 31% [2]. Such high rates have been related to inflammatory activity and structural damage, which may lead to a general loss of bone mass and increased stiffness of the spine [3, 4].

Bone mineral density (BMD) assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Patients with non-radiographic axSpA, showed lower lumbar BMD than age- and sex-matched controls [5]. However, this is not the case in patients with advanced axSpA, in whom the presence of syndesmophytes may interfere with BMD, as previously demonstrated [6, 7].

In addition to BMD, there are other DXA-derived skeletal parameters which can provide information on bone quality. Bone strain index is a parameter of bone deformation that can be applied both to lumbar and femoral DXA scans and has been proven useful in identifying patients at risk of fracture [8]. Hip structure analysis, hip axis length and neck shaft angle are methods of estimating hip geometry and biomechanical parameters using data obtained from DXA scans of the hip. They have shown to be predictors of hip fracture [9,10,11].

Inflammation has been suggested to have a direct negative effect on vertebral trabecular bone [12]. Changes in the trabecular structure can be assessed by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and high-resolution peripheral QCT (HR-pQCT), both being useful for vertebral fracture prediction [13, 14]. Nonetheless, these techniques involve high radiation exposure and may not be available in routine clinical practice.

The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a textural index that evaluates pixel gray-level variations in the lumbar spine DXA image, using specific software. It provides an indirect measure of trabecular microstructure [15]. A correlation between TBS and QCT has been demonstrated [16] and, based on the results of previous studies, it appears that TBS is not affected by the presence of syndesmophytes [12, 17]. Notably, patients with axSpA and vertebral fractures were found to have significantly lower TBS values than those without fractures [18]. Given this, we considered elucidating whether TBS may offer some advantage over BMD for estimating vertebral fracture risk in patients with axSpA.

The objectives of this study were to compare TBS and BMD between axSpA patients depending on their vertebral fracture status, to estimate the prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures, and to explore factors associated with fracture, as well as the interference of syndesmophytes on BMD and TBS in a cohort of patients with axSpA.

Methods

Study design and population

A cross-sectional study was performed. The available population was all patients with axSpA followed up at the Department of Rheumatology of the Doctor Peset University Hospital (Valencia, Spain). Those who met the following criteria were consecutively selected: diagnosis of axSpA according to Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria, 18 years of age or older, body mass index (BMI) < 37 kg/m2 (the highest permitted according to the technical specifications of our DXA device), and eligibility for DXA (absence of both bilateral hip replacement and instrumented lumbar spinal fusion).

Calculation of sample size

We used the calculator available on the website of the Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (GRANMO) [19]. A recent study [18] found that 16% of patients with axSpA and vertebral fractures had a BMD in the range considered indicative of osteoporosis, while about 29% had a low TBS. Considering an alpha of 0.05 and beta of 0.2 in two-tailed tests, a sample of 76 individuals would be required to detect differences of 0.3 units or more. We assumed that the proportion in the reference group was 0.16 and estimated a dropout rate of 5%.

Variables

The main outcome variable was the presence of morphometric vertebral fractures. This was determined by the evaluation of a plain lateral radiograph of the dorsolumbar spine, obtained using an AGFA DR 400 system. We defined vertebral fracture as a vertebral height loss of ≥ 25% (grades 2 and 3 in Genant’s semi-quantitative classification method [20]), as this appears to increase specificity compared to a lesser degree of deformity [21]. All images were evaluated by the same reader, a rheumatologist with 15 years of experience, trained by radiologists and specially focused on spine radiologic findings.

BMD and TBS were measured using a Lunar Prodigy Pro bone densitometer (GE Healthcare) and TBS iNsight® software, version 2.2, respectively. Calibration of the densitometer was daily performed using a quality assurance (QA) block, showing a coefficient of variation of 0.25%. Estimates of BMD were obtained for the lumbar spine (anterior–posterior position), the total hip and the femoral neck. BMD was expressed as the absolute value and standard deviation (SD) of the mean for the young adult population of the same sex and geographical area (T-score) or the mean for the population of the same age range in the case of premenopausal women and men under 50 years of age (Z-score).

According to the World Health Organization criteria [22], osteopenia was defined as a T score between -1 and -2.5, and osteoporosis as a T score of -2.5 or less. Patients were divided into three groups according to this criterion. In pre-menopausal women and men under 50, patients were divided based on the Z-score. A Z-score of -2.0 or lower was defined as “below the expected range for age”, and a Z-score above -2.0 as “within the expected range for age” [23]. For patients with lumbar vertebral fractures, we examined the results excluding the fractured vertebrae.

We classified TBS using the ranges described in the meta-analysis published by McCloskey et al. [24]: normal for TBS ≥ 1.3; moderate for 1.3 > TBS > 1.23; and low for TBS ≤ 1.23. For the inferential statistical analysis, patients were divided into two groups: patients with a TBS ≤ 1.23 (low TBS) versus > 1.23 (not low TBS). Absolute values were also analysed.

We collected data on the following descriptive variables: age, sex, BMI, disease duration, scores on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Functional Index (BASFI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OH-D), calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and β-CrossLaps (β-CTX) in blood, and 24-h urinary calcium, presence of lumbar syndesmophytes and/or osteophytes, and use and type of treatment for axSpa and osteoporosis.

The presence of syndesmophytes and osteophytes was evaluated on a plain radiograph of the dorsolumbar spine (anteroposterior and lateral views) obtained with the same AGFA DR 400 system as the one used to detect fractures. All images were evaluated by the same reader.

Statistical analysis

Percentage and 95% confidence interval (95% CIs) were calculated for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables, depending on the distribution of the data. Percentages were compared using chi-square tests with a continuity correction when appropriate. Means were compared using Student’s t tests or analysis of variance when data were normally distributed, and otherwise with Kruskal–Wallis/Mann–Whitney U tests. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Logistic regression analysis was used to study the factors associated with the presence of vertebral fractures.

The accuracy of TBS and BMD in classifying patients regarding their fracture status was assessed by determining the area under the receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curve. Sensitivity and specificity as well as the likelihood ratios for positive and negative test results with TBS and BMD were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.13 statistical software.

Ethical considerations

The Ethics Committee of the Doctor Peset University Hospital approved the study (date of authorisation: 12/09/2018; study code: 18/065).

The study was classified as a non-post-authorisation study (non-PAS) by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Products (AEMPS).

All eligible patients were informed verbally and in writing about the study. Prior to inclusion, all participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received a copy of the form they had signed.

Results

A total of 84 patients were included, 60 men and 24 women, with a mean age of 59 years (± SD 13). Nearly half of them (47.6%; 95% CI [37.1, 58.3]) had lumbar syndesmophytes. Ten patients had vertebral fractures, corresponding to a prevalence of 11.9% (95% CI [6.2, 20.2]). Just over half of the patients (51.2%; 95% CI [40.6, 61.8]) were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and just under half of them (48.8%; 95% CI [38.3, 59.5]) with biologics. Disease duration was greater than 10 years in almost two-thirds of patients (65.5%; 95% CI [54.9, 75]). These and other parameters describing the baseline characteristics of the sample are reported in Table 1. Total hip and femoral neck BMD and TBS data were not available for three patients, due to technical problems. Lumbar spine BMD was not available for one patient due to L1 to L4 vertebral fractures.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients included in the study
Full size table

Among patients with vertebral fractures, four of them received their first osteoporosis treatment (oral bisphosphonates) at the time of fracture diagnosis. One patient was not receiving treatment with no apparent reason. The remaining five patients started their first treatment (4 started an oral bisphosphonate and 1 bazedoxifene) due to a low BMD, switching to a second drug when vertebral fracture was detected (oral bisphosphonate, strontium ranelate, denosumab in 1 case each, and zoledronic acid in 2 cases).

The accuracy of TBS and BMD in classifying patients according to their fracture status is represented in the ROC curves shown in Fig. 1. The area under the curve was larger for TBS (0.89) than for total hip, femoral neck and lumbar BMD (0.80, 0.78, and 0.70 respectively). Nonetheless, the differences did not reach statistical significance.

Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC curves of TBS and BMD for the discrimination of vertebral fractures. a Comparison between TBS and total hip BMD in the discrimination of vertebral fractures. b Comparison between TBS and femoral neck BMD in the discrimination of vertebral fractures. c Comparison between TBS and lumbar spine BMD in the discrimination of vertebral fractures. ROC curve: receiver operating characteristic curve; TBS: trabecular bone score; BMD: bone mineral density

Full size image

TBS showed a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% CI [35.4, 87.9]) higher than that of BMD, both in the lumbar spine (11.1%; 95% CI [1.9, 43.5]) and the hip (33.3%; 95% CI [12.1, 64.6]). Its specificity (85.5%; 95% CI [75.3, 91.9]) was slightly lower than that of lumbar spine BMD (91.3%; 95% CI [82.3, 95.9]) but similar to that of hip BMD (86.9%; 95% CI [77.1, 92.9]]. The likelihood ratios were 4.4, 1.23, and 2.13 for positive test results and 0.51, 0.98 and 0.82 for negative test results for TBS, lumbar spine BMD and hip BMD respectively.

Patients with syndesmophytes were older (p = 0.04), had a higher BMI (p < 0.001), and were more likely to be male (p < 0.001) than patients without syndesmophytes. Comparisons of these and other baseline characteristics between patients with and without syndesmophytes are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Differences in baseline characteristics of patients included in the study regarding syndesmophyte status
Full size table

The presence of syndesmophytes significantly affected lumbar BMD (p < 0.001), but not TBS. In contrast, we found no interference of osteophytes on BMD or TBS.

In the univariate analysis, vertebral fractures were associated with sex, total hip and femoral neck BMD, TBS, and ESR and CRP levels. The sample was too small to assess the potential influence of disease duration or the presence of osteophytes. When adjusted for age and sex, vertebral fractures were found to be related to TBS, total hip BMD, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels. Odds ratios, confidence intervals and significance levels are reported in Table 3.

Table 3 Study of factors associated with the presence of vertebral fracture
Full size table

Discussion

The prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures in our sample was 11.9%, very similar to that described in the study of Geusens et al. [25]. A higher prevalence of radiologic vertebral fractures has been described among patients with axSpA in a study published in 2014 [2]. It should be noted that in this study the sample was small, vertebral fracture was defined as a vertebral height loss of ≥ 20% rather than ≥ 25%, and the patients included were those diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis according to the New York criteria, probably reflecting higher spinal structural damage which is known to be related to the pathogenesis of vertebral fracture in spondylitis patients.

In our study, in line with previous research [7, 15], the presence of syndesmophytes affected lumbar spine BMD but not TBS. The difference in lumbar BMD between patients with and without syndesmophytes could be partly explained by the lower percentage of women in the group with syndesmophytes than in the group without. To further assess the potential interference of spinal bone formation on these parameters, we also considered osteophytes, but did not detect any effect. This partially differs from the results of previous studies [26, 27]. A potential explanation for the lack of effect of osteophytes on lumbar spine BMD is that we only considered the presence or absence of osteophytes, rather than the extent of new bone formation, whereas this has been assessed in the aforementioned studies.

Bone microstructural changes assessed using various methods, including TBS, have shown to be predictive of vertebral fractures, independent of BMD, in both women and men [14, 16, 24, 28,29,30]. In our study, TBS, total hip BMD, ESR and CRP levels have been identified as factors independently associated with the presence of vertebral fractures. Due to the cross-sectional design of this study, the predictive value of TBS could not be assessed.

To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to compare TBS and BMD between axSpA patients depending on their vertebral fracture status in a Spanish cohort. Two previous studies addressed this question, based on cohorts from South Korea and Canada [18, 31]. The results of these studies suggest that TBS has a potential role in predicting vertebral fracture in axSpA patients. In our study, TBS was found to have higher sensitivity and comparable specificity than BMD in classifying patients for fracture status. The area under the curve was higher for TBS, although the difference with BMD did not reach statistical significance, probably due to the low sample size of our cohort.

All these results suggest that it would be worth assessing bone microarchitecture with TBS software for the estimation of the risk of vertebral fracture in patients with axSpA.

Limitations

The main limitation of our study is the scarce number of fractures found, probably determined by the small sample size. This could have influenced some of our results. First, it could have affected the accuracy of TBS and BMD in discriminating prevalent vertebral fractures. In second place, it could have influenced the relationship between clinical and laboratory factors and the presence of vertebral fractures.

The disproportion between men and women represents another limitation of our study, as the bone quality between the two differs significantly, which affects the susceptibility of vertebral fractures.

Regarding laboratory variables, we should note that we considered the most recent values recorded in the medical history, rather than an average of the values over time, which could better reflect each parameter’s status.

In addition, it should be mentioned that we were unable to analyse the interference of osteoporosis treatment in the presence of fractures due to the low sample size and the design of our study.

Further, due to the cross-sectional design of the study, an analysis of TBS for fracture prediction as an incident event could not be performed.

Conclusions

In our study, decreased TBS and total hip BMD, as well as increased ESR and CRP levels have been identified as factors independently associated with the presence of vertebral fractures.

Unlike lumbar spine BMD, TBS is not affected by the presence of syndesmophytes.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

axSpA:

Axial spondyloarthritis

BMD:

Bone mineral density

DXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

CT:

Computed tomography

TBS:

Trabecular bone score

ASAS:

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society

BMI:

Body mass index

SD:

Standard deviation

T-score:

Mean BMD for the young adult population of the same sex and geographical area

Z-score:

Mean BMD for the population of the same age range in the case of premenopausal women and men under 50 years of age

BASDAI:

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

BASFI:

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Functional Index

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

CRP:

C-reactive protein

25-OH-D:

25-Hydroxy vitamin D

PTH:

Parathyroid hormone

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

β-CTX:

β-CrossLaps

95% CI:

95% Confidence interval

ROC curve:

Receiver operating characteristic curve

References

  1. Muñoz-Ortego J, Vestergaard P, Rubio JB, Wordsworth P, Judge A, Javaid MK, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis is associated with an increased risk of vertebral and nonvertebral clinical fractures: a population-based cohort study. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(8):1770–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ulu MA, Batmaz İ, Dilek B, Çevik R. Prevalence of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures and related factors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(15):2740–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pray C, Feroz NI, Nigil HN. Bone mineral density and fracture risk in ankylosing spondylitis: a meta-analysis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;101(2):182–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramírez J, Nieto-González JC, Curbelo Rodríguez R, Castañeda S, Carmona L. Prevalence and risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48(1):44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Akgöl G, Kamanlı A, Ozgocmen S. Evidence for inflammation-induced bone loss in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(3):497–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang KY, Goo HY, Park SH, Hong YS. Trabecular bone score as an assessment tool to identify the risk of osteoporosis in axial spondyloarthritis: a case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(3):462–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wildberger L, Boyadzhieva V, Hans D, Stoilov N, Rashkov R, Aubry-Rozier B. Impact of lumbar syndesmophyte on bone health as assessed by bone density (BMD) and bone texture (TBS) in men with axial spondyloarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2017;84(4):463–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Messina C, Rinaudo L, Cesana BM, Maresca D, Piodi LP, Sconfienza LM, et al. Prediction of osteoporotic fragility re-fracture with lumbar spine DXA-based derived bone strain index: a multicenter validation study. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(1):85–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaptoge S, Beck TJ, Reeve J, Stone KL, Hillier TA, Cauley JA, et al. Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(12):1892–904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Leslie WD, Lix LM, Morin SN, Johansson H, Odén A, McCloskey EV, et al. Hip axis length is a FRAX-and bone density-independent risk factor for hip fracture in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(5):2063–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gómez Alonso C, Curiel MD, Carranza FH, Cano RP, Pérez AD. Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(8):714–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schett G. Structural bone changes in spondyloarthritis: mechanisms, clinical impact and therapeutic considerations. Am J Med Sci. 2011;341(4):269–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang X, Sanyal A, Cawthon PM, Palermo L, Jekir M, Christensen J, et al. Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group, Keaveny TM. Prediction of new clinical vertebral fractures in elderly men using finite element analysis of CT scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(4):808–16.

  14. Kopperdahl DL, Aspelund T, Hoffmann PF, Sigurdsson S, Siggeirsdottir K, Harris TB, et al. Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(3):570–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva BC, Leslie WD, Resch H, Lamy O, Lesnyak O, Binkley N, et al. Trabecular bone score: a noninvasive analytical method based upon the DXA image. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(3):518–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva BC, Walker MD, Abraham A, Boutroy S, Zhang C, McMahon DJ, et al. Trabecular bone score is associated with volumetric bone density and microarchitecture as assessed by central QCT and HRpQCT in Chinese American and white women. J Clin Densitom. 2013;16(4):554–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palma-Sánchez D, Reyes García R, Haro Martínez A, Moreno Ramos M, Linares Ferrando LF. Is the trabecular bone score useful for assessing bone quality in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and syndesmophytes? Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2020;220(2):94–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang KY, Kim IJ, Park SH, Hong YS. Associations between trabecular bone score and vertebral fractures in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(6):1033–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. GRANMO sample size calculator. https://www.imim.es/ofertadeserveis/software-public/granmo/. Accessed 15 June 2018.

  20. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8(9):1137–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonnyman AM, Webber CE, Stratford PW, MacIntyre NJ. Intrarater reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based measures of vertebral height in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom. 2012;15(4):405–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group Osteoporos Int. 1994;4(6):368–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. The International Society For Clinical Densitometry. https://iscd.org/learn/official-positions/adult-positions/. Accessed 5 Feb 2023.

  24. McCloskey EV, Odén A, Harvey NC, Leslie WD, Hans D, Johansson H, et al. A meta-analysis of trabecular bone score in fracture risk prediction and its relationship to FRAX. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(5):940–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Geusens P, De Winter L, Quaden D, Vanhoof J, Vosse D, van den Bergh J, et al. The prevalence of vertebral fractures in spondyloarthritis: relation to disease characteristics, bone mineral density, syndesmophytes and history of back pain and trauma. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kolta S, Briot K, Fechtenbaum J, Paternotte S, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D, et al. TBS result is not affected by lumbar spine osteoarthritis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(6):1759–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson KB, Holloway-Kew KL, Mohebbi M, Kotowicz MA, Hans D, Pasco JA. Is trabecular bone score less affected by degenerative-changes at the spine than lumbar spine BMD? Arch Osteoporos. 2018;13(1):127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Legrand E, Chappard D, Pascaretti C, Duquenne M, Krebs S, Rohmer V, et al. Trabecular bone microarchitecture, bone mineral density, and vertebral fractures in male osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(1):13–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McCloskey EV, Odén A, Harvey NC, Leslie WD, Hans D, Johansson H, et al. Adjusting fracture probability by trabecular bone score. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;96(6):500–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leslie WD, Aubry-Rozier B, Lix LM, Morin SN, Majumdar SR, Hans D. Spine bone texture assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS) predicts osteoporotic fractures in men: the Manitoba Bone Density Program. Bone. 2014;67:10–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Richards C, Hans D, Leslie WD. Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) predicts tracture in ankylosing spondylitis: the manitoba BMD registry. J Clin Densitom. 2020;23(4):543–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

FERBT2021: The authors thank Esther Molina Calvo, from the Research Unit at the Doctor Peset University Hospital, and the Spanish Foundation of Rheumatology for providing medical writing/editorial assistance. They also thank Fernando Alonso (at the Spanish Foundation of Rheumatology) for assisting with statistical analysis during the preparation of the manuscript.

Guidelines and regulations

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Funding

FERBT2021: The authors thank the Spanish Foundation of Rheumatology for funding medical writing/editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rheumatology Department, Doctor Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain

    Elia Valls-Pascual, Àngels Martínez-Ferrer, Ignacio Vázquez-Gómez, Eduardo Flores-Fernández, Desamparados Ybáñez-García & Juan José Alegre-Sancho

  2. Rheumatology Department, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Valencia, Spain

    Ana Victoria Orenes-Vera

  3. Pharmacy Department, Doctor Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain

    Ana Sendra-García

  4. Rheumatology Department, University General Hospital of Castellón, Castellón de La Plana, Spain

    Lydia Montolío-Chiva

  5. Radiology Department, Doctor Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain

    María Vega-Martínez, Luis García-Ferrer & Magdalena Graells-Ferrer

Authors
  1. Elia Valls-Pascual
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana Victoria Orenes-Vera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana Sendra-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Àngels Martínez-Ferrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lydia Montolío-Chiva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ignacio Vázquez-Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Eduardo Flores-Fernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Desamparados Ybáñez-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. María Vega-Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Luis García-Ferrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Magdalena Graells-Ferrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Juan José Alegre-Sancho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EVP designed this study. EVP, AVOV and JJAS wrote the main manuscript text.  AVOV, AMF, LMC, IVG, EFF, DYG contributed to acquisition of data. ASG contributed to analysis and interpretation of data. MVM, LGF, MGF, AMF, ASG and JJAS substantively revised the work. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elia Valls-Pascual.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of the Doctor Peset University Hospital approved the study (date of authorisation: 12/09/2018; study code: 18/065).

The study was classified as a non-post-authorisation study (non-PAS) by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Products (AEMPS).

All eligible patients were fully informed about the characteristics of the study verbally and in writing. All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and received a copy of the form they had signed.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valls-Pascual, E., Orenes-Vera, A.V., Sendra-García, A. et al. Relationship between trabecular bone score, bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 316 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06431-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06431-9

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us