Skip to main content
Download PDF

Postoperative D-dimer levels predict venous thromboembolisms detected with contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 24, Article number: 95 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In the literature, factors associated with postoperative venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are limited. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to identify risk and predictive factors for VTEs.

Methods

This retrospective study included 136 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLR with mechanical prophylaxis between April 2012 and July 2022. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was applied to detect VTEs comprising deep venous thromboses and pulmonary embolisms 7 days after surgery. Data including age, sex, body mass index, concomitant treatments, graft types, smoking status, operative and tourniquet times, postoperative D-dimer levels, and other laboratory test results, were collected for analyses. The incidence of radiographically confirmed VTEs and the associated risk factors, such as age, sex, body mass index, concomitant treatments, graft types, smoking status, operative and tourniquet times, postoperative D-dimer levels, and other laboratory test results, were analyzed.

Results

The overall incidence of radiographic VTEs was 11.0% (15 cases) in 136 patients. There was one symptomatic patient who had Homan’s sign. Multivariable analysis indicated that postoperative D-dimer level was an independent factor related to a radiographic VTE after ACLR, although there was no association between radiographic VTEs and preoperative status or operation status. The optimal cutoff value for postoperative D-dimer level was 2.8 μg/ml according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 83.5%.

Conclusion

The incidence of ACLR-associated radiographical VTEs (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) under mechanical prophylaxis was 11.0% in this study. An elevated D-dimer level at 7 days after surgery is an independent predictor of VTE in patients undergoing ACLR. The postoperative D-dimer level is a more reliable marker for identifying VTE in patients who underwent ACLR.

Peer Review reports

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopedic procedure, particularly in a relatively young and athletic population. Various postoperative complications have been reported to be associated with ACLR, one of which is venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) [1,2,3,4,5]. DVT may develop into a life-threatening PE. Currently, regarding the incidence of VTE being associated with ACLR, the incidence of VTE after ACLR varies from 0.4 to 16.4% [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, there is little information on DVT and PE rates as well as protocols for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. There is no standard of care, including antithrombotic medicine, for VTE after ACL reconstruction [13,14,15]. There are reports of cases with fatal or massive PE after ACLR [16,17,18]. Thus, the detection of PE after ACLR should be considered an urgent issue. Contrast-enhanced CT has improved the diagnosis of PE [19, 20] and DVT [21,22,23,24] by facilitating the determination of the incidence of DVT along with PE. and has a sensitivity and specificity similar to sonography in diagnosing proximal DVT of the lower extremities in patients with suspected PE [25]. Considering the morbidity and potential mortality associated with VTE events, a better understanding of its prevalence after ACL reconstruction is vital [7]. D-dimer level is widely used to diagnose thromboses, such as DVT and PE because it is a marker of endogenous fibrinolysis by plasmin [26,27,28]. However, it should be considered that D-dimer levels can be elevated under several circumstances, such as tumors, surgery, chemoradiotherapy, inflammation, and advanced age [29]. Evaluating the clinical risk factors, including D-dimer levels associated with the incidence of postoperative VTEs, can help with better management of patients with ACL reconstruction.

The aims of this study were to investigate the incidence of VTEs after ACLR using contrast-enhanced CT to determine potential risk factors and to determine whether postoperative D-dimer levels could be used to predict a VTE in patients undergoing ACLR. We hypothesized that the postoperative D-dimer level would be a more reliable marker for identifying patients who developed VTE after ACL reconstruction.

Material and methods

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, and written informed consent was obtained from all enrolled participants. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from April 2012 to July 2022 were retrospectively evaluated with the medical records, including CT findings. All patients routinely underwent postoperative CT scans for bone foramen evaluation. In addition, contrast-enhanced searching for VTE was performed for the patients who accepted this study. The inclusion criteria were age of > 20 years, having undergone ACL reconstruction and patients who were explained to examine the Contrast-enhanced CT 7 days after ACL reconstruction. The exclusion criteria were allergy to iodine; a history of asthma; renal insufficiency, that is, eGFR value of < 30; lack of agreement to participate in this study; patients who were given chemical DVT prophylaxis before surgery and patients without a postoperative D-dimer laboratory blood test. Contrast-enhanced CT was performed on postoperative day 7 after ACL reconstruction.

Details such as age, sex, body side, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, graft selection, concomitant treatments, duration of operation, length of tourniquet use, and blood test data (preoperative data included white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR), and D-dimer level, and D-dimer level on postoperative day 7) were recorded.

Surgical procedure and postoperative rehabilitation

All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon under general anesthesia and the leg to be operated on was placed in a lithotomy position or supine position. A tourniquet was secured in the proximal femur, and it was inflated only when a graft was harvested or during meniscus suturing. We inflated the tourniquet as minimum required; it was deflated for procedures lasting for > 90 min and re-inflated 15 min later if necessary. The transportal double-bundle technique was performed with a hamstring autograft and transtibial single bundle technique with a quadriceps tendon autograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. A suction drain was placed at the tendon harvest site and removed within 24 h after the surgery. No postoperative antithrombotic medicine was used. All patients used a sequential compressive device on the foot on the operative day and compressive stockings were used from the day after the surgery to postoperative day 14. At 24 h postoperatively, the patients began a rehabilitation regimen that included isometric quadriceps muscle strengthening and a straight leg-raising exercise with a knee immobilization brace for 1 week postoperatively. Partial weight-bearing and knee range-of-motion exercises were allowed at 1 week postoperatively; full weight-bearing was allowed at 5 weeks; and participation in low-impact activities (including jogging) was allowed at 4 months. Vigorous sports activities were allowed at approximately 8 months postoperatively.

CT examination

Contrast-enhanced CT was performed 7 days after surgery using a 64-row multi-slice CT (VCT VISION®; General Electric Company, USA or SOMATOM sensation 64®; Siemens Healthcare, Germany). Contrast-enhanced CT images of the thoracic large vessel and lower extremity vein of all cases were obtained. The contrast agent (Omnipaque®, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Japan) was injected into an upper-extremity vein. During the arterial phase, for 25–40 s after injection, imaging was performed from the pulmonary apex to the costophrenic angle. During the venous phase, 240 s after injection of the contrast agent, imaging was performed from the diaphragm to the foot. All images were acquired as 3-mm horizontal axial sections, from which coronal and sagittal sections were reconstructed. The contrast-enhanced CT was read by radiology specialists to obtain a definitive diagnosis of DVT (Fig. 1a) and PE (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Contrast-enhanced CT was read by radiology specialists to obtain a definitive diagnosis of DVT (a; arrowhead) and PE (b; arrow)

Full size image

Once the presence of thrombus was confirmed, the patients were treated with anticoagulation therapy according to the instructions of the cardiologist. Patients who had VTE received an anticoagulant for 3 months after surgery and they were reexamined with contrast-enhanced CT to evaluate the VTE.

Statistical analysis

A Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables (age, BMI, operation time, tourniquet time, and blood test). A χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables (sex, smoking status, operation technique, and graft). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for the confounding factors with P-value < 0.1 in the univariate analysis and the risk factors associated with VTE in the previous study [7, 8, 30]. Significance was set at P = 0.05. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also applied to determine the cutoff value with regard to the statistically significant factor(s). The area under the curve (AUC) was also calculated from ROC curves and the cutoff value was determined. A power analysis was performed with the power (α) difference and standard deviations set at 0.8, 0.05, 1.54, and 1.3, according to the D-dimer level. The analysis revealed that a minimum of 60 patients were required for a t-test to detect a difference between the VTE negative and VTE positive patients. All statistical analyses were performed with R version 7.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Of the 168 patients who were aged > 20 years and who underwent ACL reconstruction, 5, 4, and 1 had an allergy to iodine, asthma, and renal insufficiency, respectively. There was no patient who had given chemical DVT prophylaxis before surgery. Thirteen patients declined to participate in the study and nine did not undergo postoperative D-dimer test. After excluding these patients from this study, the remaining 136 patients (knees) were included in this retrospective comparative study (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flowchart of patients included in this retrospective study

Full size image

The baseline characteristics of the subjects are summarized in Table 1. Among the 136 patients enrolled in the study, 15 (11.0%) had radiographic VTE; 7 (5.1%) had PE, 5 (3.7%) had DVT, 3 (2.2%) had PE and DVT. Only 1 of the 15 patients showed symptomatic DVT with Homan’s sign (Table 2). No detectible statistical difference between the non-VTE and VTE groups was found for age, sex, BMI, body side, operation technique, autograft, operation time, and tourniquet time. The postoperative D-dimer level was significantly higher in the VTE group than in the non-VTE group.

Table 1 Clinical risk factors associated to VTE
Full size table
Table 2 Characteristics and Treatment of Patients who had VTE
Full size table

Multivariate logistic analyses showed that the postoperative D-dimer level (OR = 1.85, P = .002) significantly increased the risk of VTE (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate Logistic Regression Analyses of Risk Factor in VTE
Full size table

The sensitivity and specificity of the postoperative D-dimer test were calculated using cutoff values. The ROC curve analysis determined that the AUC of the postoperative D-dimer test was 0.875. A cutoff value of 2.8 mg/mL of the postoperative D-dimer level resulted in the highest sensitivity and specificity, that is, 80.0 and 83.5% (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of postoperative D-dimer levels as a factor related to postoperative VTEs. The area under the ROC curve was 87.5%. Based on ROC curve analysis, a cutoff D-dimer value of 2.8 mg/mL was deemed best to separate developing VTEs (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 83.5%; P = .001)

Full size image

Discussion

The most important findings of this study were that the incidence of radiographical VTE after ACLR with mechanical prophylaxis was 11.0%, as diagnosed by contrast-enhanced CT, and elevated D-dimer level 7 days after surgery, was an independent predictor of VTE in patients undergoing ACLR according to multivariate analysis. The optimal cutoff value for postoperative D-dimer level was 2.8 μg/ml, according to the ROC curve analysis, with a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 83.5%. Information in the present study is clinically important because detection of all VTEs after ACLR is difficult without contrast-enhanced CT.

The ability of contrast-enhanced CT to detect DVT is comparable with that of Doppler sonography in symptomatic patients, which implies that contrast-enhanced CT is an alternative modality, at least in symptomatic patients or patients with a clinical suspicion for a DVT [22,23,24]. Seung-Ick Cha et al. [21] suggested that the incidence of proximal DVT was 5.5% and the overall incidence of CT-angiographic PE was 6.6% in major orthopedic surgery. Okada et al. [31] performed contrast-enhanced CT after TKA and found asymptomatic VTE in 61.3% of patients without thromboprophylaxis. Gandhi et al. [32] reported that contrast-enhanced CT-detected asymptomatic PE in 41% of the patients after TKA surgery with low-molecular-weight heparin. In this study, the incidence of DVT and PE was 6.2 and 5.4% 7 days after ACL reconstruction with mechanical prophylaxis. Symptomatic PE occurs relatively rarely after ACL reconstruction, with incidence ranging from 0.05 to 0.21% based on a large database analysis [7, 8, 33]. Nagashima et al. [11] reported that at least 7.3% of asymptomatic PEs were detected after ACLR with contrast-enhanced CT, which was suspected to be a higher incidence than that of symptomatic PEs. In this study, the incidence of asymptomatic PEs was 5.4% with contrast-enhanced CT, which was similar to the incidence reported in a previous study [11]. Age, sex, tourniquet time, multiple ligament injury, and immobilization time were reported as risk factors for developing VTE after ACLR. Regarding age, the finding of older age being a risk factor for VTE was previously reported in several series of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction [7, 8, 33, 34]. Kraus et al. [8] reported that the only independent risk factor for symptomatic VTE was age of ≥40 years. In this study, age was not a risk factor of radiographic VTE, including asymptomatic cases after ACL reconstruction in multivariate analysis. There might be several reasons that this study may have been underpowered for an analysis between age and VTE, and this study also included only Japanese patients who generally have a small population of obese patients. The average BMI was 25.0 kg/m2 in this study, which was relatively lower than the BMI values reported for individuals of other races.

The hormonal status of female patients or the use of contraceptives could render them susceptible to DVT. Ye et al. [30] reported that female patients have a significantly higher risk of developing DVT after ACLR. They suspected that the female population had a greater mean age (35.8 ± 11.9 years) than their male counterparts (27.8 ± 8.1 years); however, a multivariate analysis was not used in their study. In this study, sex was not a risk factor for VTE after ACL reconstruction according to a multivariate analysis. DVT was more frequent with tourniquet times of > 2 h, and an extended tourniquet time was associated with combined ACL reconstruction and concomitant surgery involving the PCLR [3, 6]. In this study, there was no difference between prolonged tourniquet time and additional surgery in univariate and multivariate analyses, which could be owing to the relatively short average tourniquet time, that is, 32 min during graft harvesting, and the surgical approach being meniscal suture. The majority of the additional surgeries were meniscal repairs, and only 2.5% of this series included multiligament reconstruction. Postoperative bed rest and immobility are the known risk factors for DVT and PE and could be attributed to inpatient surgeries [35]. The ideal duration of knee immobilization after ACL reconstruction has not been elucidated, although the reported duration varied from 0 to 7 days [30, 36, 37]. From the aspect of immobilization, although the present study had no control or alternative condition groups except 1 week immobilization groups, the incidence of radiographic VTE was similar to that reported in previous studies [9, 30, 38].

D-dimer level has been reported to be a negative predictor for DVT. Ota et al. [39] reported the diagnostic value of preoperative D-dimer level to be 1.8 mg/mL (the cutoff value) with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 61.9% for orthopedic conditions. However, it has been demonstrated that surgery, trauma, hemorrhagic disease, inflammatory disease, liver and kidney diseases as well as pregnancy, which activates the internal fibrinolytic system, cause elevated levels of plasma D-dimer [40, 41]. Previous reports have demonstrated that D-dimer level was a useful screening test to exclude DVT after orthopedic surgery [42, 43]. Yoo et al. [42] reported the diagnostic value of D-dimer level to be 3.33 mg/mL on postoperative day 7 after THR with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 67%. Jiang et al. [43] reported that D-dimer level could predict the development of DVT with the highest sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 81.7% at the cutoff value of 6.17 mg/mL on postoperative day 7 for orthopedic surgeries, including TKA, THR, spinal column decompressive internal fixation, and hip fracture reduction internal fixation. In this study, the diagnostic value of D-dimer levels to predict VTE was 2.8 mg/mL on postoperative day 7 after ACL reconstruction with a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 82.2%. Thus, it seemed that D-dimer levels were a useful tool to exclude VTE of patients after ACL reconstruction.

Certain limitations in this study must be considered. First, the data were not compared with conventional pulmonary angiography and venography or sonography of the lower extremities, which are the gold standard for the diagnosis of PE and DVT. Second, this study was a retrospective study, and the number of cases was relatively small after ACL reconstruction; however, the sample size was adequate for the detection of significant difference of postoperative D-dimer between the VTE negative and VTE positive patients. Third, the absence of VTE screening such as contrast-enhanced CT, venography or sonography before surgery is a possible limitation of the present study. The patients who underwent ACL reconstruction in this study rarely had severe complications before surgery; however, the presence of preoperative VTEs was never evaluated.

Conclusion

The incidence of ACLR-associated radiographical VTEs (DVT and PE) with mechanical prophylaxis was 11.0% in this study. Elevated D-dimer level at 7 days after surgery is an independent predictor of VTEs in patients undergoing ACLR. The postoperative D-dimer level is a more reliable marker for identifying patients who developed VTE after ACL reconstruction.

Availability of data and materials

Data associated with this study is retained at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine. The datasets generated and/or analyzed in this study can are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. If there are any questions, please contact the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

VTEs:

Venous thromboembolisms

ACLR:

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

CT:

Computed tomography

DVT:

Deep venous thrombosis

PE:

Pulmonary embolism

BMI:

Body mass index

PT-INR:

Prothrombin time-international normalized ratio

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC:

The area under the curve

References

  1. Sun Y, Chen D, Xu Z, Shi D, Dai J, Qin J, et al. Deep venous thrombosis after knee arthroscopy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(3):406–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bokshan SL, DeFroda SF, Panarello NM, Owens BD. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118781328.

  3. Janssen RPA, Reijman M, Janssen DM, et al. Arterial complications, venous thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. World J Orthop. 2016;7:604–17. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Erickson BJ, Saltzman BM, Campbell KA, Fillingham YA, Harris JD, Gupta AK, et al. Rates of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary Embolus after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Sports health. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738115576927.

  5. Bokshan SL, DeFroda SF, Panarello NM, Owens BD. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary Embolus following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop. J Sports Med. 2018;21(6):2325967118781328. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118781328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong JT, Wang X, Men XQ, et al. Incidence of deep venous thrombosis in Chinese patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery for cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:3540–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3216-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaskill T, Pullen M, Bryant B, et al. The prevalence of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2714–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465156019708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kraus Schmitz J, Lindgren V, Janarv PM, et al. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Bone Jt J. 2019;101B:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0646.R1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Struijk-Mulder MC, Ettema HB, Verheyen CCPM, Büller HR. Deep vein thrombosis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective cohort study of 100 patients. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2013;29:1211–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye S, Dongyang C, Zhihong X, et al. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2013;29:742–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagashima M, Otani T, Takeshima K, Seki H, Nakayama M, Origuchi N, et al. Unexpectedly high incidence of venous thromboembolism after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: prospective, observational study. J ISAKOS. 2020;5:80–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2019-000390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun Y, Chen D, Xu Z, et al. Incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective knee arthroscopic surgery: a retrospective study with routinely applied venography. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:818–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chahal J, Lee A, Heard W, Bach BR Jr. A retrospective review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon: 25 years of experience. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013;1(3):2325967113501789. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967113501789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stefan Marlovits MD, Gabriele Striessnig MD, Raimund Schuster MD, Roland Stocker MD, Monika Luxl MD, Siegfried Trattnig MD, et al. Extended-duration Thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin after arthroscopic surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(7):696–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Munoa L, Gonzalez AB, Diaz de Rada P, Valenti A, Valenti JR. Rivaroxaban is as efficient and safe as bemiparin as thromboprophylaxis in knee arthroscopy. Musculoskelet Surg. 2014;98:21–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-013-0287-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourget-Murray J, Clarke MA, Gorzitza S, Phillips LA. Symptomatic bilateral pulmonary embolism without deep venous thrombosis in an adolescent following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2018;12:194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1726-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koaban S, Alatassi R, Ahmed B, et al. Bilateral pulmonary embolism after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;49:64–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.06.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Takigami J, Hashimoto Y, Yamasaki S, Terai S, Nakamura H. A case of asymptomatic bilateral massive pulmonary embolism after arthroscopic multiple knee ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(1):260–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3466-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akpinar MG, Goodman LR. Imaging of pulmonary thromboembolism. Clin Chest Med. 2008;29(1):107–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2007.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Hull RD, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317–27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cha S-I, Lee S-Y, Kim C-H, Park J-Y, Jung T-H, Yi J-H, et al. Venous thromboembolism in Korean patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery: a prospective observational study using computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography and indirect CT venography. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2010.25.1.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goodman LR, Stein PD, Matta F, Sostman HD, Wakefield TW, Woodard PK, et al. CT venography and compression sonography are diagnostically equivalent: data from PIOPED II. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1071–6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Byun SS, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Chun YS, Park CH, Kim WH. Evaluation of deep vein thrombosis with multidetector row CT after orthopedic arthroplasty: a prospective study for comparison with Doppler sonography. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:59–66. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.1.59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim KE, Hsu WC, Hsu YY, Chu PH, Ng CJ. Deep venous thrombosis: comparison of indirect multidetector CT venography and sonography of lower extremities in 26 patients. Clin Imaging. 2004;28:439–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00319-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas SM, Goodacre SW, Sampson FC, van Beek EJR. Diagnostic value of CT for deep vein thrombosis: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(3):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.09.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stevens SM, Gregory Elliott C, Woller SC, et al. The use of a fixed high sensitivity to evaluate five D-dimer assays’ ability to rule out deep venous thrombosis: a novel approach. Br J Haematol. 2005;131(3):341–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05774.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Waser G, Kathriner S, Wuillemin WA. Performance of the automated and rapid STA Liatest D-dimer on the STA-R analyzer. Thromb Res. 2005;116(2):165-70.4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2004.12.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Evaluation of D- dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1227–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa023153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tripodi A, Legnani C, Palareti G, et al. More on: high thrombin generation and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:906–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03338.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ye S, Dongyang C, Zhihong X, Dongquan S, Jin D, Jianghui Q, et al. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(4):742–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Okada Y, Furumatsu T, Miyazawa S, et al. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography screening is efective for detecting venous thromboembolism not prevented by prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Med Okayama. 2015;69:355–60. https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/53910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gandhi R, Salonen D, Geerts WH, et al. A pilot study of computed tomography-detected asymptomatic pulmonary filling defects after hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast. 2012;27:730–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jameson SS, Dowen D, James P, et al. Complications following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the English NHS. Knee. 2012;19:14–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2010.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hetsroni S, Lyman H, Do G, Mann RG, Marx. Symptomatic pulmonary embolism after outpatient arthroscopic procedures of the knee: the incidence and risk factors in 418,323 arthroscopies. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):47–51. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23 Suppl 1):I9–16. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000078469.07362.E6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Adala R, Anand A, Kodikal G. Deep vein thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(5):450–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.83952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nakayama H, Yoshiya S. The effect of tourniquet use on operative performance and early postoperative results of anatomic double- bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18:586–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0405-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Oshiba H, Nawata M, Morioka S, Momose T, Maeda T, Nakatsuchi Y. The incidence and risk factor of deep venous thrombosis after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25(3):477–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2019.05.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ota M, Nakamura M, Yamada N, Yazu T, Ishikura K, Hiraoka N, et al. Prognostic significance of early diagnosis in acute pulmonary thromboembolism with circulatory failure. Heart Vessel. 2002;17:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003800200036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Heim SW, Schectman JM, Siadaty MS, Philbrick JT. D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: a metaanalysis. Clin Chem. 2004;50(7):1136–47. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.031765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schutgens R, Haas F, Gerritsen W, et al. The usefulness of five D-dimer assays in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1(5):976–81. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00148.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yoo M-C, Cho Y-J, Ghanem E, Ramteke A, Kim K-I. Deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty in Korean patients and D-dimer as a screening tool. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(7):887–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0751-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jiang Y, Li J, Liu Y, Li Y-C, Zhang W-G. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis after orthopedic surgery and the diagnostic value of D-dimer. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;29(4):675–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2014.12.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Edanz Group (https://en-authorservices.edanzgroup.com/) for English language editing.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan

    Yusuke Hashimoto, Atsushi Masuda & Hiroaki Nakamura

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

    Eriko Komiya & Kazuya Nishino

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan

    Yohei Nishida

Authors
  1. Yusuke Hashimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eriko Komiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazuya Nishino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yohei Nishida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Atsushi Masuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hiroaki Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YH: Conception and design. Drafting of the article. EK: acquisition and analysis of the data. KN: Drafting of the article, and acquisition of the data. YN: acquisition and interpretation of the data. AM: acquisition of the data. HN: Conception and design, final approval of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Hashimoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine (2257) and performed in strict accordance with the ethical standards stipulated in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All subjects provided their informed consent to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashimoto, Y., Komiya, E., Nishino, K. et al. Postoperative D-dimer levels predict venous thromboembolisms detected with contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06212-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06212-4

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us