Skip to main content

Prior use of antibiotics and immunosuppression are risk factors for fracture-related infection during the COVID-19 pandemic period: a Brazilian prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the role of COVID-19 pandemic period on the epidemiology of fracture-related infection (FRI). The present study summarizes the changes in the prevalence, microbiology, and risk factors of FRI during this period.

Methods

A prospective single-center cohort study assessed in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021), clinical, microbiological aspects, and independent risk factors (RF) of FRI. RFs were estimated by bivariate and multivariable analyses using prevalence ratio (PR) with significance at P < 0.05. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to evaluate treatment outcomes.

Results

Overall, 132 patients were analyzed, with patients with age over 65 years accounting 65.1%. FRI was diagnosed in 21(15.9%) patients. Independent RFs for FRI were recent and preoperative use of systemic antibiotics (PR: 7.0, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.2 – 22.4, p = 0.001) and cancer (PR: 9.8, 95% CI: 2.0 – 48.8, p = 0.005). Cultures yielded Gram-negative bacteria in 77.8%, 33.3% were MDR.

Conclusions

We found higher rates of FRI, predominating in the elderly with closed femoral fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior use of antibiotics and immunosuppression conditions were independent factor for FRI. Our outcomes provide evidence to avoid the empirical use of antibiotics prior to surgery for fracture stabilization.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Fracture-related infection (FRI) remains one of the main concerns among victims of orthopedic trauma due to the higher frequency of unfavorable outcome, especially among patients with open fractures and extensive soft tissue injuries [1, 2]. The infection rate after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) ranges from 0.4 to 16.1%, in open fractures, but it may be higher depending on many factors including the degree tissue damage and contamination, and patient’s underlying chronic medical condition [3]. Recent studies show that the average cost per FRI-patient can reach US$108,000 dollars, with a cure rate ranging between 70 and 90% [4].

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic period, surgical procedures for orthopedic fractures stabilization turned out to be a challenge to accomplish. Due to the overwhelming need to treat SARS-CoV-2 virus severe cases and the consequent readjustment of hospitalization flows, surgeries for open and closed fractures stabilization were frequently postponed, usually prolonging the length of hospital stay [5]. Moreover, with the social mobility lockdown during this period of time, there seems to have been a decrease in road traffic accidents and the consequent increase in domestic trauma, such as hip and femur closed fractures in the elderly [6]. Additionally, it is known that SARS-CoV-2 virus infection triggers a pro-inflammatory cytokines storm that in conjunction with the inflammatory process following bone fractures, is likely to influence the morbidity and mortality among these patients [7]. This risk could be mitigated among those undergoing elective surgeries in which a minimum period of 6 weeks was recommended between the COVID-19 diagnosis to the surgical procedure [8]. Nevertheless, for patients undergoing fracture correction in emergencies, co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus may be difficult to be ruled out and prevent [9].

Despite the well-known poor outcome of infection following orthopedic fractures on the quality of life of individuals and the higher impact on the socioeconomic status of public or private health care systems, the role of COVID-19 pandemic period (2020–2021) on the epidemiology and management of FRI has yet to be well understood [10]. Therefore, the present study aims at describing the changing epidemiology of patients treated for closed and open fracture stabilization during the SARS-COV-2 pandemic period, the FRI rates with at least one-year of follow up, the microbiological profile and to analyze independent risk factors for FRI.

Materials and methods

Study design

This is a prospective observational single-center cohort study conducted during the 2020–2021 COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 to March 2021), carried out at a specialized orthopedic trauma center in São Paulo/Brazil, among patients undergoing any surgical treatment of open and closed fractures, in which the diagnosis of FRI had been performed. The primary purpose was to assess in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic period, the outcome of patients treated for fracture stabilization, including the prevalence of fracture-related infection (FRI), the microbiological epidemiology and to analyze independent risk factors for FRI. The study was previously approved, with the waiver of the free and informed consent form, by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) under the number: 0846P/2021.

Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years old or over, trauma victims with open and/or closed fractures who underwent any type of surgery for bone fracture stabilization using plate and screw, intramedullary nail (IMN) and Kirschner wires. Patients undergoing arthroplasties or spine instrumentation, severe cases likely to progressed to death within the first 7 days of hospitalization, and patients unable to undergo outpatient follow-up during the study period, and those who did not undergo any type of surgical intervention were excluded. Fracture-related infection (FRI) was defined according to criteria published by Metsemakers et al. [11]. Multidrug-resistant microorganism (MDR) was defined as the non-susceptibility of the identified pathogen to at least one antimicrobial agent from 3 or more different antimicrobial classes [12, 13].

Data collection and variables analyzed

Data were prospectively collected and recorded in data collection forms by the specialists in the musculoskeletal infection group (ECS, SP) based on information from electronic medical records filled out during hospitalization and outpatient follow-up for up to one year after index surgery. The variables were divided as follows: variables related to the patient (1), related to the surgical and perioperative procedure (2). The variables related to the patient were (1): demographics, comorbidities, alcoholism, smoking, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification, Charlson comorbidity index, previous use of antimicrobials in the last three months and previous orthopedic infections. Surgical and perioperative procedure were (2): location and classification of the fracture, type of fracture, time between fracture and surgical treatment, prophylactic antimicrobial therapy, COVID-19 symptomatic infection, time of antimicrobial therapy, concomitant infection in the same period of hospitalization, presence of postoperative hematoma, presence of sepsis at the time of infectious diagnosis and early or late infection, result of blood culture sample and microbiological profile.

Microbiological analysis

During the surgical procedure for diagnosis and treatment of FRI, between 3 to 5 samples of peri-implant tissue and bone were collected aseptically, placed in properly labeled sterile containers and sent to the microbiology and histopathology laboratory. In the laboratory, tissue samples were homogenized in 3 ml of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar for 1 min and inoculated on aerobic blood agar, chocolate agar and anaerobic blood agar in a flask at 35ºC, and also in Thioglycolate (TG) medium (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD). Blood agar and chocolate agar plates were then incubated at 35–37 °C for 5 days for aerobic cultures and 14 days for anaerobic cultures. TG broth was incubated for 14 days, and in case of bacterial growth (turbidity), the liquid was seeded on blood agar plates (aerobic and anaerobic cultures). Microbiological methods for synovial fluids were similar, inoculating 0.1 mL on agar and liquid broth plates and evaluating aerobically and anaerobically. Isolated bacterial colonies were identified by matrix-assisted laser ionization-desorption-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). The sensitivity profile was determined for all identified strains according to the prevailing standards of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (Standardization of Antimicrobial Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing: Approved Standard—8th Edition, 2010, Vol. 23 No 1) [14]. Low virulence microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis) were considered pathogenic when the organism was found in at least 2 different tissue culture samples [14, 15].

Statistical analysis

Data analysis included mean, median, standard deviation, interquartile range, variance for continuous variables and frequencies and proportion for categorical variables. The association between two categorical variables was performed using Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The Kaplan–Meier test and the log-rank test were used to assess the influence of the variables of interest on survival time, that is, the time until infection occurs. A Cox regression model was fitted to identify factors related to time to infection. Risk estimates were calculated on the variables associated with risk factors for FRI and reported as a prevalence ratio (PR) with respect to the 95% confidence interval (CI). Variables with p ≤ 0.25 were selected for multivariable analysis. All results were considered significant for a probability of significance lower than 5% (p < 0.05), therefore having at least 95% confidence in the conclusions presented.

Results

Overall, 189 patients with orthopedic fractures were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Of these, 57 (30.1%) were excluded: spine fracture (16), femoral neck fracture undergoing arthroplasty (30), two patients excluded for age under 18 years, 05 did not undergo surgical correction and 04 patients lost prospective outpatient follow-up. A total of 132 patients who underwent surgical correction of fractures were selected for analysis and prospective followed, of which male sex was 75%, with mean age of 50.4 years (SD ± 22.9 years). Patients with age over 65 years accounted 65.1%. Charlson comorbidity index with a low score (up to 4 points) was diagnosed in 80.9% of patients. Fractures due to road traffic accidents (motorcycle/car) and falls from standing height occurred in 42.4% and 30.3%, respectively. Lower limbs fractures accounted for the majority of cases (80.3%). Closed and open fractures were 72.7% (96/132) and 27.3% (36/132), respectively. Out of 36 open fractures, 69.4% were classified as Gustilo-Anderson III or higher. Fracture-related infections (FRI) were diagnosed in 21 (15.9%) patients, of which 13 (9.8%) and 8 (6.1%) were open and closed fractures, respectively. (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagram of patients involved in the study

Temporary external fixator insertion for the first surgical fracture stabilization was placed in 20.6% of patients. Definitive surgical correction of the fracture within 72 h of the trauma occurred in 66.7%. Importantly, during the study period 3.8% (5/132) of patients evolved with symptomatic Covid-19 infection after surgery, requiring specific respiratory assistance in the intensive care unit. In addition, 3.8% (5/132) of patients described a recent preoperative use of systemic antibiotics for any cause. Demographic, pre- and post-surgical findings can be found in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with trauma and treatment of 132 patients evaluated

The risk variables showing statistical significance of FRI in the univariate analysis were recent use of antibiotics in the preoperative period (p = 0.002), type of fracture (open vs. closed, p < 0.001), use external fixator (with vs. without, p = 0.015), osteosynthesis with plate and screw (p = 0.006), mechanism of injury (car accident vs others, p = 0.023), infection by COVID (p = 0.028) (Table 2).

Table 2 Risk factor for the infection outcome according to univariate analysis

However, in the multivariable analysis, only recent and preoperative use of systemic antibiotics and the presence of cancer were independent risk factors for FRI (Table 3). Indeed, among those with recent antibiotic intake, the incidence of FRI was 7 times higher (CI 2.2; 22.4) than in the group that did not use antibiotics. While the presence of cancer increased the risk for FRI by approximately 9.8 times (CI 2; 48.8). These two variables were found mainly in elderly patients. In the survival analysis to identify independent risk factors related to time to diagnosis of FRI and death, prior use of antibiotic, habit of smoking and open fractures influenced the time to FRI or death with statistical significance. (Table S1 and Fig. 2).

Table 3 Risk factors independently associated to infection outcome–multivariable analysis
Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for infection considering recent preoperative use of ATB. DATABASE: 130 cases (No 125 cases and Yes 5 cases); ATB Antibiotic

Regarding microbiological findings among 21 FRI patients, tissue cultures were negative in six (28.5%), and polymicrobial in 4 (19.2%). The most frequent isolated microorganisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae (27.8%) and other Enterobacteriaceae (77.7%). Fewer Gram-positive cocci (22.2%) and no S. aureus were identified. Overall, seven patients (33.3%) were infected by multi-resistant microorganisms (Table S2).

Discussion

There are few prospective studies carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic period aiming to describe the current changes in the epidemiology and risk factors of FRI [16]. In our study the overall FRI rate was 15.9%, which is high compared to the 11.6% described by Kamat et al. [17] and similar to the 14.9% described by Singh et al. [18].

Rather than road traffic accidents, domestic trauma seemed to have stood out during the pandemic period especially falls from any height involving the elderly due to the long period of social distancing and domestic confinement [16, 19]. On top of that, the presence of comorbidities and the severe co-infection by SARS-CoV-2 virus also became important risk factors for FRI in this population, according to the multicenter study by McDonald et al. [20]. This study compared injuries and trauma mechanisms before and during the pandemic, depicting a reduction in the number of fractures in general, but an increase of over 30% of hip fractures. Additionally, the author showed an increase in the age range of the population. The present study also identified a similar clinical and epidemiological trend related to patient’s demographics, comorbidities, and characteristics of trauma. Moreover, despite having few severe cases (five) of COVID-19 infection, it proved to be a significant factor for FRI in the univariate analysis and likely influenced towards the higher rates of FRI. We also hypothesized that this shift may have been due to the restrictive measures implemented during the lockdown to contain the virus progress. Besides, the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection severity and consequently increased in the length of hospital stay justifies the frequently delay for definitive surgical fracture stabilization which some of our patients experienced during this pandemic period. Among many modified and non-modified factors, delayed definitive fracture stabilization following closed trauma is thought to impact in the rates of FRI in the elderly [21].

An important find in the present study was the role of recent use of preoperative antibiotics which was a strong and independent association with FRI. Patients with a history of previous used antibiotics had 7 times higher risk of FRI than patients who had not. This data is very relevant due to few previous reports in the literature. In their series of 502 patients, Declerq et al. [22] showed that the use of an antimicrobial regimen to treat an infection unrelated to the fracture was statistically significant for the occurrence of FRI. However, there were unclear reasons for this association. Although not analyzed in the study, we argue that an over prescription of empirical antibiotic therapy is likely to have occurred during the entire COVID-19 pandemic period, including within the orthopaedic inward of our tertiary hospital where a higher number of elderly patients with closed fractures underwent orthopaedic surgery. Recent published multicenter studies corroborate this argument, showing an overuse of empirical antibiotic therapy among hospitalized patients [23]. Besides, inappropriate prescription of antibiotics increases the selective pressure on patient`s bacterial microbiota impacting on the development of drug-resistant bacterial infections [24]. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria were the causative agents of 33% of FRI in the present study.

Comorbidities in the elderly population is common, including diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart diseases and cancer which impairs the immune response. In our study the presence of any type of cancer increased the risk for FRI by approximately 9.8 times. Conversely, in a case series study of 480 patients, Metsemakers et al. [25] observed that the healthier patients without immune-depressive comorbidities evolved with lower infection rate.

The role of high-energy open fractures in the pathogenesis of FRI is well investigated [26, 27], while in the present study it was independently associated with time to diagnosis of FRI. In fact, more than two-thirds of FRI cases comprised open fractures. In the setting of public healthcare system in developing countries, the management of patients with high energy open fractures of the lower limb due to road traffic accidents may be hampered, increasing the likelihood of FRI [28,29,30]. Nevertheless, we are in accordance with Morgenstern et al.[31] emphasizing the importance of having a holistic and multidisciplinary approach in the prevention of FRI following trauma. In this regard patient`s characteristics including common habits are taken into consideration. Several studies associate smoking with poor surgical treatment outcomes for fractures, although the evidence is still contradictory [32, 33]. In our series, smoking was independently influenced the time to diagnosis of FRI.

The study has limitations for being carried out in a single center of a large tertiary teaching hospital offering special orthopaedic care to a regional population located in a major city in a developing country, which limits the global comparison of the data. Besides, the overall number of FRI was low that may have biased our results, although multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent factors related to time and diagnosis of infection. Importantly, another limitation is related to patient`s selection bias as we excluded those with extreme ill conditions with greater immunological susceptibility to infections and likely to progress to death within the first 7 days of hospitalization. Nevertheless, we included in the analysis patients with severe comorbidities such as neoplasia and those with extreme advanced ages. A challenging factor was carrying out the study during the lockdown period, which made it difficult to diagnose and treat FRI. However, the patients were followed prospectively, for a period of at least 12 months, and most importantly the definitions of FRI used were standardized and well-defined according to Metsemakers et al. [12], decreasing the chance of bias. Moreover, the robust statistical analysis of the data contributes relevant information for planning higher impact study designs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in this single-center prospective study we found higher rates of FRI, predominating in the elderly with closed lower limb fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Prior use of antibiotics and presence of cancer were independent factor for FRI. The majority of infection were due Gram-negative bacteria with higher rates of MDR. Our outcomes provide evidence to avoid the empirical use of antibiotics prior to surgery for fracture stabilization. Further analysis during the lockdown period may be needed to confirm these results.

Availability of data and materials

Epm, Ortoinfecto (2022), “MUSCULOSKELETAL INFECTION”, Mendeley Data, V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/grxjspbf29.1.

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

ATB:

Antibiotic

BHI:

Brain-heart infusion

CI:

Confidence interval

COVID:

Coronavirus infection diseases

CLSI:

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute

DAIR:

(Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention)

FRI:

Fracture relationed infection

G-A:

Gustillo & Anderson

IMN:

Intramedullary Nail

MALDI-TOF MS:

Matrix-assisted laser ionization-desorption-time-of-flight

MDR:

Multidrug-resistant

OR:

Odds ratio

PR:

Prevalence Ratio

RF:

Risk factors

SD::

Standard deviation

TG:

Thioglycolate

UNIFESP:

Federal University of São Paulo

References

  1. Hellebrekers P, Leenen LP, Hoekstra M, Hietbrink F. Effect of a standardized treatment regime for infection after osteosynthesis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0535-x (PMID:28279223;PMCID:PMC5345171).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fang C, Wong TM, Lau TW, To KK, Wong SS, Leung F. Infection after fracture osteosynthesis - Part I. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):2309499017692712. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017692712 (PMID: 28215118).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Søjbjerg JO, Eiskjaer S, Møller-Larsen F. Locked nailing of comminuted and unstable fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(1):23–5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B1.2298789 (Erratum.In:J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992 Jan;74(1):165 PMID: 2298789).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Metsemakers WJ, Onsea J, Neutjens E, Steffens E, Schuermans A, McNally M, Nijs S. Prevention of fracture-related infection: a multidisciplinary care package. Int Orthop. 2017;41(12):2457–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3607-y (Epub 2017 Aug 22 PMID: 28831576).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tadros BJ, Black J, Dhinsa BS. COVID-19 outbreak: The early response of a UK orthopaedic department. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(Suppl 3):S301–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.04.033 (Epub 2020 May 12. PMID: 32398916; PMCID: PMC7217071).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadfield JN, Gray AC. The Evolving COVID-19 Effect on Hip Fracture Patients. Injury. 2020;51(7):1411–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.006 (PMID:32553412;PMCID:PMC7295511).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin SH, Zhao YS, Zhou DX, Zhou FC, Xu F. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): cytokine storms, hyper-inflammatory phenotypes, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Genes Dis. 2020;7(4):520–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2020.06.009 (Epub 2020 Jun 29. PMID: 32837983; PMCID: PMC7323676).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. COVIDSurg Collaborative; GlobalSurg Collaborative. Timing of surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(6):748–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15458 (Epub 2021 Mar 9. PMID: 33690889; PMCID: PMC8206995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong JSH, Cheung KMC. Impact of COVID-19 on Orthopaedic and Trauma Service: An Epidemiological Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(14): e80. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00775 (PMID:32675668;PMCID:PMC7431143).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maryada VR, Mulpur P, Guravareddy AV, Pedamallu SK, Vijay Bhasker B. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthopaedic Trauma Volumes: a Multi-Centre Perspective From the State of Telangana. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54((Suppl 2)):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00226-z (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32836367; PMCID: PMC7423500).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, McNally MA, Moriarty TF, McFadyen I, Scarborough M, Athanasou NA, Ochsner PE, Kuehl R, Raschke M, Borens O, Xie Z, Velkes S, Hungerer S, Kates SL, Zalavras C, Giannoudis PV, Richards RG, Verhofstad MHJ. Fracture-related infection: A consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury. 2018;49(3):505–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040 (Epub 2017 Aug 24 PMID: 28867644).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horton SA, Hoyt BW, Zaidi SMR, Schloss MG, Joshi M, Carlini AR, Castillo RC, O’Toole RV. Risk factors for treatment failure of fracture-related infections. Injury. 2021;52(6):1351–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.057 (Epub 2021 Apr 1 PMID: 33863501).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salles MJ, Zurita J, Mejía C, Villegas MV. Latin America working Group on Bacterial Resistance. Resistant gram-negative infections in the outpatient setting in Latin America. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(12):2459–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881300191X (Epub 2013 Aug 7. PMID: 23924513; PMCID: PMC3821403).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zitron R, Wajsfeld T, Klautau GB, Da Silva CB, Nigro S, Mercadante MT, et al. Concentration of Sonication Fluid through Centrifugation Is Superior to Membrane Filtration for Microbial Diagnosis of Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(3):788–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yano MH, Klautau GB, Da Silva CB, Nigro S, Avanzi O, Mercadante MT, et al. Improved diagnosis of infection associated with osteosynthesis by use of sonication of fracture fixation implants. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(12):4176–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu P, Wu C, Zhuang C, Ye T, Zhang Y, Liu J, Wang L. The patterns and management of fracture patients under COVID-19 outbreak in China. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(15):932. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4174 (PMID:32953732;PMCID:PMC7475431).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamat AS. Infection rates in open fractures of the tibia: is the 6-hour rule fact or fiction? Adv Orthop. 2011;2011:943495. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/943495 (Epub 2011 Oct 27. PMID: 22111008; PMCID: PMC3205596).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh J, Rambani R, Hashim Z, Raman R, Sharma HK. The relationship between time to surgical debridement and incidence of infection in grade III open fractures. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2012;7(1):33–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-012-0130-y (Epub 2012 Mar 31. PMID: 22467141; PMCID: PMC3332320).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tarun V, Anurag T, Yugal K, Raj K, Lalit M. Orthopaedic operating room considerations in covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review. J Arthrosc Jt Surg. 2021;8(2):91–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2021.02.008 (Epub 2021 Feb 23. PMID: 34307063; PMCID: PMC7900750).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. MacDonald DRW, Neilly DW, Davies PSE, Crome CR, Jamal B, Gill SL, Jariwala AC, Stevenson IM, Ashcroft GP. SCORE authors. Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on orthopaedic trauma: a multicentre study across Scotland. Bone Jt Open. 2020;1(9):541–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0114.R1 (PMID: 33215152; PMCID: PMC7659679).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicholson JA, Makaram N, Simpson A, Keating JF. Fracture nonunion in long bones: A literature review of risk factors and surgical management. Injury. 2021;52(Suppl 2):S3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.029 (Epub 2020 Nov 11 PMID: 33221036).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Declercq P, Zalavras C, Nijssen A, Mertens B, Mesure J, Quintens J, De Ridder T, Belmans A, Nijs S, Spriet I, Metsemakers WJ. Impact of duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on development of fracture-related infection in open fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(2):235–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03474-8 (Epub 2020 May 14 PMID: 32409906).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bendala Estrada AD, Calderón Parra J, Fernández Carracedo E, Muiño Míguez A, Ramos Martínez A, Muñez Rubio E, Rubio-Rivas M, Agudo P, Arnalich Fernández F, Estrada Perez V, Taboada Martínez ML, Crestelo Vieitez A, Pesqueira Fontan PM, Bustamante M, Freire SJ, Oriol-Bermúdez I, Artero A, Olalla Sierra J, Areses Manrique M, Carrasco-Sánchez HFJ, Vento VC, García García GM, Cubero-Morais P, Casas-Rojo JM, Núñez-Cortés JM. Inadequate use of antibiotics in the covid-19 era: effectiveness of antibiotic therapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):1144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06821-1 (PMID:34749645;PMCID:PMC8575150).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Dellinger EP, Caplan ES, Weaver LD, Wertz MJ, Droppert BM, Hoyt N, Brumback R, Burgess A, Poka A, Benirschke SK, et al. Duration of preventive antibiotic administration for open extremity fractures. Arch Surg. 1988;123(3):333–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400270067010 (PMID: 3277588).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Metsemakers W-J, Handojo K, Reynders P, Sermon A, Vanderschot P, Nijs S. Individual risk factors for deep infection and compromised fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: A single centre experience of 480 patients. Injury. 2015;46(4):740–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Foster AL, Moriarty TF, Trampuz A, Jaiprakash A, Burch MA, Crawford R, Paterson DL, Metsemakers WJ, Schuetz M, Richards RG. Fracture-related infection: current methods for prevention and treatment. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18(4):307–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2020.1729740 (Epub 2020 Feb 19 PMID: 32049563).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. You DZ, Schneider PS. Surgical timing for open fractures: Middle of the night or the light of day, which fractures, what time? OTA Int. 2020;3(1): e067. https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000067 (PMID:33937687;PMCID:PMC8081492).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ricci WM, Gallagher B, Brandt A, Schwappach J, Tucker M, Leighton R. Is After-Hours Orthopaedic Surgery Associated with Adverse Outcomes? J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91(9):2067–72. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Foote CJ, Tornetta P 3rd, Reito A, Al-Hourani K, Schenker M, Bosse M, Coles CP, Bozzo A, Furey A, Leighton R; GOLIATH Investigators. A Reevaluation of the Risk of Infection Based on Time to Debridement in Open Fractures: Results of the GOLIATH Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Limited Trial Data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Feb 3;103(3):265–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01103. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Mar 17;103(6):e25.

  30. Roddy E, Patterson JT, Kandemir U. Delay of Antibiotic Administration Greater than 2 Hours Predicts Surgical Site Infection in Open Fractures. Injury. 2020;51(9):1999–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.031 (Epub 2020 May 12 PMID: 32482427).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Morgenstern M, Kühl R, Eckardt H, Acklin Y, Stanic B, Garcia M, Baumhoer D, Metsemakers WJ. Diagnostic challenges and future perspectives in fracture-related infection. Injury. 2018;49(Suppl 1):S83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30310-3 (PMID: 29929701).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alt V, Giannoudis PV. Musculoskeletal infections: A call for papers to continue the battle against this devastating global challenge. Injury. 2021;52(11):3187–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.006 (PMID: 34740386).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smolle MA, Leitner L, Böhler N, Seibert FJ, Glehr M, Leithner A. Fracture, nonunion and postoperative infection risk in the smoking orthopaedic patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6(11):1006–19. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210058 (PMID:34909221;PMCID:PMC8631245).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the” Hospital São Paulo” for the support to conduct this study.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ECS, SP, ADA and MJS; Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND Final approval of the version to be published; AND Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.CF, FBR, INS and MNK; Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND Final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Cezar Santos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was previously approved, with the waiver of the free and informed consent form, by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) under the number: 0846P/2021. In addition, we confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations currently available.

Waiver of consent justification Patient consent was waived by the local IRB for this observational study because involved in minimal risk to the subject due to the anonymization of patients’ data and meets specific criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic period. The reasonable rationale for why the research would not be possible without the waiver is stated below:

1. The need to carry out only online consultation follow-up, made it difficult to obtain many patients’ consents, as social distance was mandatory during this period.

2. Fracture-related infection diagnosis is usually performed months after surgery, and many patients were contacted online or even by telephone, hindering the possibility to obtain a signed informed consent.

3. The research could not practicably be carried out without waiver, as involved more than 100 non-infected patients.

4. Part of this cohort study is retrospective because existing data, specimens and medical records were available and analysed as of the date of IRB submission.

5. The research could not practicably be carried out without using identifiable private information and biospecimens in an identifiable format.

6. The waiver will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects.

7. Inability to identify subjects that is likely to evolve to fracture-related infection, which may occur from the emergency admission to months after the surgical procedure. Therefore, the study staff can't plan for coverage to obtain consent.

8. The study involved more than 100 patients undergoing any type of surgery for fracture stabilization, which has been physically impossible to obtain consent from them all.

9. The number of patients with FRI was small (21) and removing any subject due to the impossibility to obtain the consent or even those refusing to participate in the study would largely bias our results.

10. FRI is a relatively rare disease and loss of a few subjects would affect the power of the study.

11. During the COVID-19 pandemic period, there were subjects, especially older patients, with severe medical condition and co-infected with SARS-CoV2 virus infection, which was not appropriate to approach families during the course of hospitalization.

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Assessment of the influence of variables in time until infection diagnosis. Table S2. Frequency of microorganisms isolated in tissue cultures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos, E.C., Prebianchi, S., Santos, I.N. et al. Prior use of antibiotics and immunosuppression are risk factors for fracture-related infection during the COVID-19 pandemic period: a Brazilian prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 535 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05493-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05493-5

Keywords

  • Fracture-related infection
  • Elderly
  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • Risk factors
  • Gram-negative bacteria
  • Multidrug-resistance
  • Prior use of antibiotic
  • Cancer