Skip to main content
Download PDF

Calcar fracture gapping: a reliable predictor of anteromedial cortical support failure after cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric femur fractures

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 23, Article number: 175 (2022) Cite this article

A Correspondence to this article was published on 28 July 2022

A Correspondence to this article was published on 28 July 2022

Abstract

Background

Maintaining anteromedial cortical support is essential for controlling sliding and decreasing postoperative implant-related complications. However, adequate fracture reduction with cortical support in immediate postoperative fluoroscopy is not invariable in postoperative follow-ups. This study was conducted to investigate the risk factors leading to anteromedial cortical support failure in follow up for pertrochanteric femur fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 159 patients with pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA- 31A1 and 31A2) that fixed with cephalomedullary nails. All patients were evaluated as adequate fracture reduction in immediate postoperative fluoroscopy before leaving the operation theater. The patients were separated into two groups based on the condition of the anteromedial cortex in the postoperative 3D CT with full-range observation: those with calcar support maintained in Group 1 and those with calcar support lost in Group 2. Demographic information, fracture classification, TAD (tip-apex distance), Cal-TAD, Parker ratio, NSA (neck-shaft angle), reduction quality score, and calcar fracture gapping were collected and compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the risk factors leading to anteromedial cortex change.

Results

Anteromedial cortical support failure was noted in 46 cases (29%). There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning age, sex, side injury, TAD, Cal-TAD, Parker ratio, or NSA. There was a significant difference in the AO/OTA fracture classification in univariate analysis but no difference in the multivariable analysis. The reduction quality score, calcar fracture gapping in the AP (anteroposterior), and lateral views were significantly associated with anteromedial cortical support failure in follow-up after cephalomedullary nailing in the multivariable analysis. The threshold value of calcar fracture gapping for the risk of loss was 4.2 mm in the AP and 3.8 mm in the lateral fluoroscopies. Mechanical complications (lateral sliding and varus) were frequently observed in the negative anteromedial cortical support group.

Conclusions

Good reduction quality was a protective factor, and larger calcar fracture gapping in the AP and lateral views were risk factors leading to the postoperative loss of anteromedial cortical support. Therefore, we should pay close attention to fracture reduction and minimize the calcar fracture gap during surgery.

Peer Review reports

Background

For pertrochanteric femur fractures, static rigid fixation leads to more non-union and fixation failure; dynamic limited sliding is recommended for ideal fracture union [1,2,3]. Recently, cephalomedullary nails have been favorable owing to their biomechanical advantages and minimally invasive surgery [4,5,6,7]. It is worth noting that helical blade/lag screw cut-out occasionally occurs with an incidence rate of 13 to 15% [8, 9]. Related studies have proven that maintaining anteromedial cortical support is essential for controlling sliding and decreasing postoperative implant-related complications [10,11,12]. However, the verified anteromedial cortical support in immediate postoperative fluoroscopy or radiography taken before the patient leaves the operation theatre does not always remain invariable [13,14,15,16]. Previous research found a 20% reduction loss rate of anteromedial cortical support in postoperative follow-ups [13, 17].

This study was conducted to explore the possible risk factors leading to postoperative changes in anteromedial cortical support. We hypothesized that unstable fracture type, poor fracture reduction quality, and larger residual calcar fracture gapping after intramedullary nail fixation would result in a higher failure rate of the anteromedial cortex apposition.

Methods

Patient data and inclusion criteria

After Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent obtained from all enrolled patients, patients diagnosed with 31A1 and 31A2 pertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA-II (proximal femoral nail anti-rotation) between January 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All the methods were carried out following the guidelines and regulations. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 60 years old; isolated fracture occurred less than 2 weeks prior; complete imaging data including preoperative radiography, intraoperative fluoroscopy, CT scanning, and 3D reconstruction took 1 week after the operation; and radiographic follow-ups for at least 6 months. The exclusion criteria included pathological fractures and immediate postoperative fluoroscopic images showing negative cortical relations in either AP, lateral, or 30-degree oblique views, before the patient leaving the operative theatre.

The 3D CT reconstruction images were considered the standard to judge the anteromedial cortical support, as they provided 360-degree full range views of the cortex [13]. According to the postoperative 3D CT scanning, patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, maintenance of calcar support as shown with positive or anatomic anteromedial cortical relation, and Group 2, loss of calcar support as shown with negative cortical relation.

The clinical data comparison included sex, age, side involved, and fracture classification. The technical data included TAD, Cal-TAD, Parker ratio, NSA, fracture reduction quality score, and residual calcar fracture gapping. The fracture classification was based on the AO/OTA-2007 version [18]. This research classified pertrochanteric fractures into only two subgroups, A1 and A2, to reduce the discrepancy between the sub-classifications.

Surgical procedure

The patients were placed in the supine position on a fracture traction table. With the guidance of intraoperative fluoroscopy, routinely closed reduction maneuvers were performed to obtain fracture alignment. Negative cortical positional relationships before nailing were not allowed in either AP or lateral projections. However, if the fracture reduction redisplaced after nailing, we accepted it, and no further manipulation was attempted, especially in older and frail patients.

Postoperative management

Postoperative standing and walking were essential for secondary stability. The rehabilitation process was individually tailored according to the patient’s physical capability and willingness. With good physical strength, early weight-bearing standing and walking were encouraged; otherwise, bed rest was recommended for 1 month, with no sitting or turning restrictions.

Parameter measurement

Clinical and technical data were collected and measured by two independent researchers. One was a fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon, and the other was an orthopaedic resident. The mean value of the data calculated by the two observers was used for statistical analysis. A senior professor joined the discussion if any disagreement occurred. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to judge the intra-observer reliability and was determined to be good (> 0.800). Standard AP, lateral (axial), and anteromedial oblique fluoroscopic views were acquired in the operating room. Immediate postoperative radiographic images were used to calculate technical data such as TAD, Cal-TAD, Parker ratio in the AP and lateral views, NSA, and calcar fracture gapping in the AP and lateral views. The technical data were calculated by using Photoshop CC 2018 (Adobe) software with the pixel ruler technique. The measurement of calcar fracture gapping in the AP view was calculated according to previously described studies [19, 20] (Fig. 1). The lateral view was measured parallel to the sliding direction of the head-neck fragment (Fig. 2). The TAD, Cal-TAD, Parker ratio, NSA, and lateral sliding distance were calculated as previously described [21,22,23]. The assessment of the fracture reduction quality was evaluated according to the four-point criteria proposed by Prof. Chang [11].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Calcar residual fracture gapping measurement at the medial basicervical in the AP view

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Anterior fracture gapping in the lateral view, defined parallel to the sliding direction of the head-neck fragment

Full size image

Outcomes

The primary outcome was defined as the degree of fracture gapping in the AP/lateral views in the immediate postoperative fluoroscopies, which predict loss of anteromedial calcar support in postoperative follow up. The follow-up time was set to be more than 6 months, as the fractures could either have union or fixation failure occurred [20, 24]. Mechanical complications were defined as varus displacement (NSA reduced > 10° postoperatively) [25] and/or excessive lateral sliding of the helical blade (lateral sliding ≥10 mm postoperatively) [26].

Statistical analysis

SPSS 22.0 software was used for the statistical analysis (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous data are presented as the mean and SD (standard deviation). Categorical data are presented as counts and percentages. For the frequencies, the x2 or Fisher exact test was conducted for univariate analysis. The t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test was performed for univariate analysis to compare the means. Variables with a p-value less than 0.10 were further included in the multivariable analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to estimate the threshold value of calcar fracture gapping for predicting anteromedial cortex alterations. A p-value less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

In total, 159 cases were included in this study. Anteromedial cortical support failure was noted in 46 patients (29%). The demographic information and technical data comparison between the two groups are shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference in age, sex, side of injury, TAD, Cal-TAD, Parker ratio, or NSA. There was a considerable difference concerning fracture classification, reduction quality score, and calcar fracture gapping in AP and lateral views. However, only good reduction quality score was an independent protective factor, and calcar fracture gapping in AP, and lateral views were independent risk factors in the multivariable analysis (Table 2). Mechanical complications are shown in Table 3. The loss-of-calcar support group suffered inferior mechanical complications compared with the maintenance-of-calcar support group (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical data comparison between Group 1 and Group 2
Full size table
Table 2 multivariable analysis to detect possible risk factors for losing anteromedial cortex-to-cortex support
Full size table
Table 3 Mechanical complications
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

An illustrative case of maintenance-of-calcar support in postoperative 3D-CT follow-up. A: An 86-year-old female diagnosed with 31A2.3 trochanteric fracture. B: Immediate AP fluoroscopy after operation showed positive relation of the two medical cortices; the arrow indicated a close contact of the inferior medial calcar. C: Immediate lateral fluoroscopy after operation showed neutral relation of the two anterior cortices; the arrow indicated minimal gap at the anterior cortex. D: Postoperative 3D CT image showed true positive anteromedial cortical support at the inferior corner. E: In postoperative 26 months follow-up, the fracture healed with minimal lateral sliding of the helical blade

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

An illustrative case of loss-of-calcar support in postoperative 3D-CT follow-up. A: A 77-year-old female, diagnosed with 31A2.2 trochanteric fracture. B: Immediate AP fluoroscopy after operation, the arrow showed a large calcar fracture gap of the medial cortex (4.83 mm). C: Immediate lateral fluoroscopy after operation, the arrow showed a large calcar fracture gap of the anterior cortex (3.61 mm). D: Postoperative 3D CT image showed negative anteromedial cortical support. The arrow indicated posterior sagging of the head-neck fragment. E: In postoperative 14 months follow-up, the AP radiograph showed an apparent lateral sliding of the helical blade (10.5 mm)

Full size image

According to the ROC curve threshold value analysis for postoperative anteromedial cortical support failure, the best cut-off point of calcar fracture gapping for balancing sensitivity and specificity was 4.2 mm in the AP view and 3.8 mm in the lateral view (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

A graph demonstrating the ROC curve by plotting the sensitivity and the 1-specificity. For the calcar fracture gapping assessment, the recommended cut-off point for balancing sensitivity and specificity was 4.2 mm with 91.3% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity in the AP view and 3.8 mm with 80.4% sensitivity and 85.8% specificity in the lateral view. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.922 for the AP view and 0.843 for the lateral view

Full size image

Discussion

This retrospective study investigated the risk factors leading to anteromedial cortical support failure in follow-ups for pertrochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails. The reduction quality and residual calcar fracture gapping between the head-neck and femoral shaft fragments in the AP and lateral views were reliable predictors of anteromedial cortical support alterations. These findings further developed the concept of cortical support theory with quantification.

Anteromedial cortical support reduction

Anteromedial cortical support reduction was introduced by Chang et al. [11] in 2015 for pertrochanteric fractures. Anteromedial cortical support reduction is a non-anatomic buttress reduction that allows limited sliding along the lag screw/helical blade axis and achieves secondary stability, providing mechanical stability to share loads from the implant and biological environment for fracture healing [1, 13, 17]. In contrast, the mean loss of the femoral neck-shaft angle, neck shortening, varus deformity, healing complications, and implant failure in the negative medial cortical support group was significantly higher than positive/neutral medial cortical support groups [10, 12, 27]. Similarly, our research revealed that mechanical complications (including varus displacement and excessive lateral migration) were frequently observed in the negative anteromedial cortex support group.

Postoperative alteration of anteromedial cortical support reduction

In 2018, Chang et al. [13] revealed the discrepancy of anteromedial cortical support reduction in pertrochanteric fractures between immediate postoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative 3D CT reconstructions. Acceptable anteromedial cortical contact in both AP and lateral views (positive or neutral) endured an approximately 20% loss rate of cortical support postoperatively. Furthermore, Chen et al. [17] added a 30-degree oblique view (displaying the anteromedial inferior corner cortices) to estimate anteromedial cortex contact status. The change rate still reached up to 10%. However, the possible risk factors predicting the change in the final cortical contact are still out of reach. Therefore, this research preliminarily revealed that fracture reduction and calcar fracture gapping played an essential role in inducing the alteration of anteromedial cortical support.

Importance of fracture reduction quality

In 1980, Prof. Kaufer [28] proposed five factors influencing the treatment outcomes of trochanteric fractures: bone quality, fracture morphology, implant choice, implant placement, and fracture reduction quality. The first two factors belong to fracture characteristics and are non-modifiable. The last three factors are modifiable and could be controlled by the orthopaedist. Among the five factors, fracture reduction is the first manipulation during operation and is regarded as paramount compared with other factors [29].

In 1995, Baumgartner et al. [24] proposed the criteria for fracture reduction quality, including both the alignment and displacement degree of the main fragments. The fracture reduction quality was rated as good, acceptable, and poor. Based on the alignment and medial/anterior cortex contact status, Chang and colleagues further proposed [11] a new fracture reduction criterion for trochanteric fractures, which is more reliable in indicating postoperative mechanical complications than the Baumgaertner reduction system [12]. Studies have revealed that poor reduction quality is an independent risk factor for implant failure and inferior outcomes [19, 30]. Similarly, this study found that good reduction quality was an independent protective predictor of anteromedial cortical support alteration in pertrochanteric fractures treated with intramedullary nails (OR, 0.097; 95% CI, 0.022–0.430; p = 0.002). Our result was consistent with previous studies concerning the importance of fracture reduction quality. Therefore, we should emphasize the importance of reduction quality before the intramedullary nailing process.

Calcar fracture gapping

During the surgery, anteromedial calcar fracture gapping was frequent. Zhang et al. [31, 32] reported that an inferior medial gap (mean and standard deviation, 9.2 ± 4.6 mm) appears during intramedullary nailing in basicervical trochanteric fractures, called the reverse wedge effect. In addition, inferior placement of the guidewire is beneficial for acquiring an ideal Cal-TAD. However, when the spiral blade is hammered into the head and neck bone, it easily impinges on the bone block due to the narrow local space and promotes separation of the bone block, which is called the impingement effect [33]. It is worth noting that calcar fracture gapping is also a subset criterion for fracture reduction quality. Baumgaertner reduction quality criteria considered the displacement of fragments in the AP or lateral view of more than 4 mm as unacceptable criteria [24, 34].

Existing larger calcar fracture gapping is associated with a poor prognosis. Parry et al. [20] revealed that calcar gapping and fracture classification was related to over sliding of lag screws leading to revision surgeries, which is consistent with our results. Ciufo et al. [19] also revealed that basicervical gapping (defined as cortical diastasis > 3 mm) and mal-reduction were risk factors for cutting out in trochanteric fractures treated by cephalomedullary nails. Lobo-Escolar et al. [35] demonstrated that diastasis of fragments > 3 mm postoperatively was significantly more common in the cut-out group treated with femoral intramedullary nailing. In this research, we discovered that calcar fracture gapping in the AP (OR, 2.022; 95% CI, 1.456–2.808; p < 0.001) and lateral (OR, 1.437; 95% CI, 1.060–1.947; p = 0.019) views were risk factors leading to the negative transformation of anteromedial cortical support.

Mechanisms lead to the change

Limited fracture gapping is beneficial for subsequent fragment sliding and secondary stability to achieve medial cortex-to-cortex contact. However, the cortex-to-cortex buttress will not be realised if the space is larger than one cortical thickness. Due to the biomechanical characteristics of the hip joint, the head-neck fragment obliquely slides in the inferior lateral direction until it contacts the intramedullary nail, which gains implant support. Therefore, the existing larger calcar gap might lead to the loss of anteromedial cortical support during the sliding process [1]. In addition to calcar fracture gapping, other factors might also interfere with sliding and change anteromedial cortical support. Possible factors include the capacity to activate head-neck sliding, the orientation of sliding, external rotation of the femoral shaft, and rotation during sliding.

Study limitations

The limits of this research were the retrospective analysis and the number of cases enrolled. The intraoperative fluoroscopic images were low in resolution, which possibly led to an error during the measurement. However, intraoperative CT was not always available in the majority of operating theatres. The pixel ratio calculation method was beneficial for decreasing the error. Osteoporosis severity was not analysed in this research, as we considered that patients over 60 years old who suffered from low-energy fractures could be diagnosed with severe osteoporosis.

Conclusions

For pertrochanteric femur fractures fixed with cephalomedullary nails, poor reduction quality and larger calcar fracture gapping in the AP and lateral views were risk factors leading to changes in anteromedial cortical support. Mechanical complications more frequently occurred in the group that lost anteromedial cortex support. Therefore, before inserting the nail, good reduction quality should be realized, and calcar fracture gapping in the AP and lateral views should be controlled to be less than 4 mm. Close contact of the fragments is beneficial for decreasing the sliding of the head and neck fragment and ensuring anteromedial cortical support at the anteromedial corner.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request if requested (please contact shiminchang11@aliyun.com).

Abbreviations

3D-CT:

Three dimensional computed tomography

TAD:

Tip apex distance

Cal-TAD:

Calcar referenced tip-apex distance

NSA:

Neck shaft angle

AP:

Anteroposterior

ICC:

Intra-class correlation coefficient

ROC:

Receiver Operating Characteristics

AUC:

Area under the curve

References

  1. Chang SM, Hou ZY, Hu SJ, Du SC. Intertrochanteric femur fracture treatment in Asia: what we know and what the world can learn. Orthop Clin North Am. 2020;51(2):189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Socci AR, Casemyr NE, Leslie MP, Baumgaertner MR. Implant options for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: rationale, evidence, and recommendations. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(1):128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kokoroghiannis C, Aktselis I, Deligeorgis A, Fragkomichalos E, Papadimas D, Pappadas I. Evolving concepts of stability and intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures--a review. Injury. 2012;43(6):686–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen J, Hu C, Yu S, Huang K, Xie Z. A meta-analysis of percutenous compression plate versus intramedullary nail for treatment of intertrochanteric HIP fractures. Int J Surg (London, England). 2016;29:151–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Strauss E, Frank J, Lee J, Kummer FJ, Tejwani N. Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. Injury. 2006;37(10):984–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciufo DJ, Ketz JP. Proximal femoral shortening and Varus collapse after fixation of “stable” Pertrochanteric femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35(2):87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rehme J, Woltmann A, Brand A, von Ruden C. Does auxiliary cerclage wiring provide intrinsic stability in cephalomedullary nailing of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures? Int Orthop. 2021;45(5):1329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk PR. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(8):1029–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stern LC, Gorczyca JT, Kates S, Ketz J, Soles G, Humphrey CA. Radiographic review of helical blade versus lag screw fixation for Cephalomedullary nailing of low-energy Peritrochanteric femur fractures: there is a difference in cutout. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(6):305–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li J, Zhang L, Zhang H, Yin P, Lei M, Wang G, et al. Effect of reduction quality on post-operative outcomes in 31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures following intramedullary fixation: a retrospective study based on computerised tomography findings. Int Orthop. 2019;43(8):1951–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, Li Q, Dargel J, Eysel P. Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(6):811–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mao W, Ni H, Li L, He Y, Chen X, Tang H, et al. Comparison of Baumgaertner and Chang reduction quality criteria for the assessment of trochanteric fractures. Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(10):502–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Du SC, Ma Z, Hu SJ, Yao XZ, et al. Anteromedial cortical support reduction in unstable pertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of intra-operative fluoroscopy and post-operative three dimensional computerised tomography reconstruction. Int Orthop. 2018;42(1):183–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim EJ, Sakong S, Son WS, Cho JW, Oh JK, Kim CH. Comparison of sliding distance of lag screw and nonunion rate according to anteromedial cortical support in intertrochanteric fracture fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2021;52(10):2787–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kristan A, Benulic C, Jaklic M. Reduction of trochanteric fractures in lateral view is significant predictor for radiological and functional result after six months. Injury. 2021;52(10):3036–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li SJ, Kristan A, Chang SM. Neutral medial cortical relation predicts a high loss rate of cortex support in pertrochanteric femur fractures treated by cephalomedullary nail. Injury. 2021;52:3530–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen SY, Chang SM, Tuladhar R, Wei Z, Xiong WF, Hu SJ, et al. A new fluoroscopic view for evaluation of anteromedial cortex reduction quality during cephalomedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures: the 30 degrees oblique tangential projection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic trauma association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(10 Suppl):S1–133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ciufo DJ, Zaruta DA, Lipof JS, Judd KT, Gorczyca JT, Ketz JP. Risk factors associated with Cephalomedullary nail cutout in the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(11):583–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parry JA, Sapp T, Langford JR, Koval KJ, Haidukewych GJ. Variables associated with lag screw sliding after single-screw Cephalomedullary nail fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34(7):356–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baumgaertner MR, Solberg BD. Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(6):969–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuzyk PR, Zdero R, Shah S, Olsen M, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):414–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parker MJ. Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(4):625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(7):1058–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Boyce AM, Corsi A, De Maio F, Collins MT. Radiographic classification of coronal plane femoral deformities in polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1558–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu W, Zhou D, Liu F, Weaver MJ, Vrahas MS. Mechanical complications of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with trochanteric femoral nails. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(2):304–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jia X, Zhang K, Qiang M, Chen Y. The accuracy of intra-operative fluoroscopy in evaluating the reduction quality of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2020;44(6):1201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaufer H. Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;146:53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haidukewych GJ. Intertrochanteric fractures: ten tips to improve results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(3):712–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fan J, Xu X, Zhou F, Zhang Z, Tian Y, Ji H, et al. Risk factors for implant failure of intertrochanteric fractures with lateral femoral wall fracture after intramedullary nail fixation. Injury. 2021;52:3397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.07.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Y, Hu J, Li X, Qin X. Reverse wedge effect following intramedullary nailing of a basicervical trochanteric fracture variant combined with a mechanically compromised greater trochanter. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hao W, Fang L, Yin S, Lin Y, Wang B. Reverse wedge effect following intramedullary nail fixation of trochanteric fracture, what does it imply? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu S, Du S, Xiong W, Chen S, Song H, Chang S. Effectiveness of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation for high plane intertrochanteric femur fractures. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021;35(3):307–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010;41(12):1312–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 81772323).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200090, China

    Hui Song, Shi-Min Chang, Sun-Jun Hu, Shou-Chao Du & Wen-Feng Xiong

Authors
  1. Hui Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shi-Min Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sun-Jun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shou-Chao Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wen-Feng Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SMC designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data; HS collected and analyzed the data, drafted and revised the manuscript; SJH revised the manuscript, interpreted the data; SCD and WFX collected and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shi-Min Chang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University (Shanghai, China). Written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

The participants have consented to the publication of the article.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, H., Chang, SM., Hu, SJ. et al. Calcar fracture gapping: a reliable predictor of anteromedial cortical support failure after cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric femur fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04873-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04873-7

Keywords

  • Pertrochanteric fracture
  • Calcar fracture gapping
  • Cephalomedullary nailing
  • Anteromedial cortical support
  • Fracture reduction quality

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us