Table 1 Demographic and clinical data comparison between Group 1 and Group 2
Characteristic | Group 1 (n = 113) | Group 2 (n = 46) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 82.0 ± 9.2 | 84.4 ± 7.0 | 0.116 |
Sex (%) | Â | Â | 0.114 |
 Male | 39 (34.5) | 10 (21.7) |  |
 Female | 74 (65.5) | 36 (78.3) |  |
Side (%) | Â | Â | 0.757 |
 Left | 51 (45.1) | 22 (47.8) |  |
 Right | 62 (54.9) | 24 (52.2) |  |
AO/OTA classification (%) | Â | Â | 0.005 |
 A1 | 52 (46.0) | 10 (21.7) |  |
 A2 | 61 (54.0) | 36 (78.3) |  |
Reduction quality score; Good/Acceptable (%) | 104/9 (92.0/8.0) | 11/35 (23.9/76.1) | < 0.001 |
NSA (degree) | 130.8 ± 6.0 | 131.0 ± 5.3 | 0.810 |
TAD (mm) | 24.00 ± 7.19 | 23.68 ± 6.97 | 0.794 |
Cal-TAD (mm) | 24.06 ± 5.87 | 25.00 ± 6.91 | 0.387 |
Calcar fracture gapping in AP view (mm) | 2.36 ± 1.57 | 7.09 ± 2.70 | < 0.001 |
Calcar fracture gapping in lateral view (mm) | 2.22 ± 1.61 | 5.89 ± 3.27 | < 0.001 |
Parker ratio in AP view (%) | 41.91 ± 7.84 | 43.32 ± 8.46 | 0.315 |
Parker ratio in Lat view (%) | 47.12 ± 8.74 | 44.72 ± 8.32 | 0.114 |