- Research article
- Open Access
Association between muscle strength, upper extremity fatigue resistance, work ability and upper extremity dysfunction in a sample of workers at a tertiary hospital
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 22, Article number: 508 (2021)
Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders negatively affect ability to perform activities of daily living, self-care and work. Therefore, outcome measurements that address muscle strength, fatigue resistance, functionality and work physical capacity must be defined to assess and plan specific actions to minimize them.
To investigate the association of upper extremity muscle strength with upper extremity fatigue resistance, work ability and upper extremity dysfunction in a sample of workers from a tertiary hospital.
Shoulder and elbow isokinetic strength were assessed by Biodex System 4™, isometric hand grip by JAMAR™, upper extremity fatigue resistance by Functional Impairment Test Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA), ability to work by the Work Ability Index and upper extremity dysfunction by the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand QuickDASH-Br questionnaire. The Nordic questionnaire and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were used for pain description. The associations were analysed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho) (p < 0.05).
Twenty-seven participants: 59.2% women; mean age 46 years old; 70.3% obese/overweight; 62.9% active with predominantly dynamic muscle contraction work. Besides predominance of good to moderate work ability (81.4%) and comorbidities (37%), all participants had symptoms of the upper extremities for at least 12 months, with a predominance of low-intensity in the shoulder (55.5%). In addition, 88.8% reported pain in other segments. Muscle strength of abduction (rho = 0.49), adduction (rho = 0.40), internal rotation (rho = 0.44) and hand grip (rho = 0.68) presented moderate correlation with FIT-HaNSA. Hand grip (rho = − 0.52) showed moderate correlation with upper extremity dysfunction.
The results of this preliminary study suggested the association of shoulder strength with fatigue resistance. Also, hand grip strength was associated with upper extremity dysfunction and fatigue resistance. No association was found with the Work Ability Index in this sample. So, it is suggested that hand grip and shoulder strength could be outcome measurements used for future interventions focused on upper extremity preventive exercises to improve strength and fatigue resistance of workers at risk for the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Other individual, psychosocial and organizational risk factors must also be considered as influences on upper extremity function.
Shoulder abduction, adduction and internal rotation strength were associated with the upper extremity fatigue resistance of workers
Hand grip strength was inversely correlated to upper extremity dysfunction in workers
Upper extremity muscle strength was not associated with the ability to work
Hand grip and shoulder strength could be outcome measurements for future interventions focused on preventive exercises to improve the upper extremity strength and fatigue resistance of workers
Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders affect productivity, resulting in disability and absenteeism. They can be multifactorial and related to occupational and non-occupational risk factors [6, 16]. Physical demands involving repetitive work, lack of muscle recovery, precision of movements and static postures, as well as psychosocial factors, are important risk factors for the development of upper extremity disorders among females and males [30, 39, 46, 52, 56].
Overall, there is a substantial prevalence (36.8%) of work-related upper extremity complaints [7, 31]. These complaints show a high prevalence in different populations of hospital workers, reaching 62.1% for shoulders and 51.7% for wrists and hands in nurses in an orthopaedic sector . For workers in a hospital nutrition service, a prevalence of 29% was found for complaints in the wrist and hand, 37% for the neck region and 10% for the elbow joint , and 70.1% of hospital cleaning service workers had musculoskeletal complaints . Since musculoskeletal pain in the upper extremity represents a relevant prevalence, it becomes useful to obtain more accurate information about the work demands related to this segment . Thus, rehabilitation or prevention programmes, ergonomic and musculoskeletal assessments and education strategies must be considered .
Muscle strength is the greatest predictor of function, mobility and independence . An instrument used for this measurement is the dynamometer, which can be either isometric or isokinetic. Isokinetic evaluation analyses strength, power, work, fatigue percentage and muscle performance and classifies these data as normal or altered. Thus, it allows for the evaluation of the effectiveness of a treatment, dictates the rehabilitation objectives and establishes normative values of strength [15, 18]. In addition to strength, fatigue resistance is another indicator of functionality and physical capacity. Work demand is an important ability to be analysed, considering that muscle fatigue is a complaint frequently reported among workers . In this context, muscle fatigue can be defined as an imbalance between work demands and the worker’s ability to perform a task, and it is associated with a decrease in motor performance, speed and range of motion and may be caused by repetition of a single activity for prolonged periods . Long-term fatigue increases the risk of incapacity for work and impairs the ability to maintain a satisfactory level of production [52, 59].
Recent studies with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of a multimodal intervention programme through specific resistance exercises, muscle stretching, massage, education and ergonomic guidelines carried out in the workplace for reducing musculoskeletal pain symptoms in the upper extremity and neck have shown promising results [1, 33, 42, 45, 47, 49, 56, 60].
Considering that work-related upper extremity dysfunction is a growing issue, showing high prevalence, high costs, long-term absenteeism and decreased productivity in different economic sectors [31, 56], it is necessary to develop studies that analyse relevant factors for future preventive or therapeutic approaches directed to specific population needs. Thus, to gain a better understanding and define the best primary outcome variables involved in workers’ musculoskeletal complaints for future interventions, the aim of this study was to analyse the association of the muscle strength of the shoulder, elbow and hand with fatigue resistance, work ability and upper extremity dysfunction in a sample of workers at a university hospital. Thus, with this preliminary study, we propose an evaluation protocol for a randomized clinical trial to be implemented in a tertiary hospital, which aims to compare the effect of ergonomic guidelines associated or not with upper extremity strengthening workplace exercises.
This cross-sectional observational study was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee (No. 2,724,782, CAAE 89138818.1.0000.5440) in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. This study was part of a randomized controlled trial (www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04047056). All participants signed an informed consent form before participating.
The sample size calculation was performed by a priori analysis with G-Power 3.1 (Axel Buchner, Germany) , based on the rationale of difference of shoulder abduction strength between symptomatic x asymptomatic upper extremity (alpha 0.05, power 0.8 and effect size 0.5) and identified 27 participants. The sample consisted of workers from a tertiary university hospital invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. The participants were people of both sexes, aged between 25 and 60 years, who could have had pain or discomfort in the upper extremity over the previous 12 months, which may have been unilateral or bilateral, classified with a predominance of static or dynamic muscle contraction work of the upper extremity during labour activities. Dynamic work was characterized as alternating postures with consequent alternation of contraction and relaxation of the muscles of the upper extremities during a work cycle. Static work was characterized as a predominance of isometric muscle contraction with static or sustained postures and use of prehension for prolonged periods of time [16, 28]. We excluded people who had recent surgery or trauma and were unable to perform the proposed tests for physical or cognitive reasons.
Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS)
Using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever), participants were instructed to choose the numerical value that best represented their pain intensity at that moment. A rating was made as follows: 0, no pain; 1–3, mild pain; 4–6, moderate pain; and 7–10, severe pain .
Lateral preference inventory
To assess laterality, the Lateral Preference Inventory was applied to analyse manual preference in tasks representative of the ADLs. It is divided into eight items and the participants fill in the activities according to their preferences in the options: always left, left majority, indifferent right majority, always right and I don’t know. At the end, the participants are classified as right-handed, left-handed or ambidextrous .
Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire
This questionnaire was used to define the location and chronicity of symptoms. It consisted of a body map divided into nine segments: neck, shoulders, upper back, elbows, wrists/hands, lower back, hips/thighs, knees and ankles/feet and presented four questions with binary responses (“yes/no”) for each segment .
International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ)-short version
This instrument was applied in order to estimate the weekly time spent in physical activities, taking into account walking activities and activities with moderate and vigorous intensity that had a minimum duration of 10 continuous minutes, in addition to the time spent in the sitting position. The participants were characterised as very active, active, irregularly active or sedentary .
Quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH-Br)
This questionnaire was used to define the level of upper extremity dysfunction. It is composed of 11 items, taken from the DASH questionnaire of 30 items, designed to assess the symptoms and physical and social functions related to complaints in the upper extremity. Each item was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 points, where 1 indicated “no difficulty” and 5 indicated “extreme difficulty”, with a final score ranging from 0 to 100 and the maximum score indicating greater dysfunction in the upper extremity [5, 10].
Work ability index
This instrument was used to assess, through the worker’s self-report, the participants’ perceptions of working conditions and physical, mental and social capacities that may be related to their complaints. The index contains 10 questions divided into seven domains and the results provide a measure of work ability, which range from 7 to 49 points, and are classified by ability as low (7 to 27), moderate (28 to 36), good (37 to 43) or excellent (44 to 49) .
Isokinetic and isometric dynamometer
Muscle strength was assessed using the Biodex System 4 Pro™ (Biodex Medical Systems, Inc., Shirley, NY, USA) isokinetic dynamometer following all the calibration and use recommendations proposed by the manufacturer in the manual. The force variable used was the mean torque peak (concentric mode), at a speed of 60°/sec as recommended for the evaluation of orthopaedic complaints .
The participant’s position was based on the guidance material provided by the Biodex™ system. The movements evaluated were abduction/adduction of the shoulder in the scapular plane [27, 38], positioning the shoulder at 30° anterior to the frontal plane (Fig. 1a), in a range of motion from 30° (Fig. 1b) to 120° (Fig. 1c).
The internal and external rotations of the shoulder were also assessed in a range of motion from 30° (Fig. 2a) to 30° (Fig. 2b). Isokinetic elbow flexion and extension were assessed in a range of motion from 0° (Fig. 3b) to 130° (Fig. 3a). Five maximal repetitions were performed for each movement, and the asymptomatic extremity was tested first and then the symptomatic extremity. The evaluator stimulated the production and maintenance of strength through the verbal command “strength, strength, strength” during the effort.
Hand grip strength was assessed by a JAMAR™ isometric dynamometer (National Institute for Health Research, Southampton), which is an instrument recommended by the American Society of Therapists of Hand (ASTH). The participant was placed seated in a chair without an armrest, their feet flat on the floor, shoulder adducted with neutral rotation, elbow flexed at 90° and the forearm in a neutral position (Fig. 4). The JAMAR™ handle was attached in the second position, which allows a balanced activation of the intrinsic and extrinsic flexors of the fingers . Three maximal repetitions were performed on each side starting from the asymptomatic upper extremity. The time for the execution of each attempt was on average 5 s, and the alternation between one member and another was the time established for rest. The evaluator stimulated the production and maintenance of strength through the verbal command “strength, strength, strength” during the effort. At the end, the average of the three measurements was calculated.
A JobSim™ System (JTech medical industries, Inc.,USA) prototype was developed and used to perform the upper extremity fatigue resistance test, or Functional Impairment Test-Hand, and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA). It is a three-task test that represents upper extremity gross motor functions, such as reaching and holding objects at different heights and work sustained above the head  (Fig. 5). The test consists of performing two unimanual tasks, performed by both sides, starting with asymptomatic side and one bimanual task developed in the following steps:
Task 1) Waist-Up: One shelf was placed at waist level and the other 25 cm above it. Three 1 kg containers were placed on the lowest shelf. The participant was instructed to move the three containers from one shelf to another, at a speed of 60 beats/minute, controlled by a metronome.
Task 2) Eye-Down: One shelf was placed at eye level and the other 25 cm below it. The participant was again instructed to move the three containers from one shelf to another at the same speed (60 beats/minute).
Task 3) Overhead-Work: A board containing screws was attached perpendicularly to the shelf at eye level. The participants were instructed to keep both arms raised and use them to screw and unscrew the screws in a predetermined sequence: the screw that was on level 1 (top) must be moved to level 2 (middle), the screw from level 3 (lower) to level 1 and the screw from level 2 to level 3.
Each task was performed only once for a maximum of 300 s or when the participant interrupted the test due to pain, upper extremity fatigue or disability. The rest between one task and another was established by the time taken to adjust the shelf for the subsequent task . To analyse the correlations, the average time of the three tasks was calculated.
The evaluation was carried out in a single day and applied by the same physiotherapist. If the participant had bilateral complaints or pain in more than one segment of the upper extremity, the site and member of highest pain intensity was defined as the symptomatic member/site measured by the NPRS.
Before starting the tests, instrument familiarisation and randomisation of upper extremity muscle strength and fatigue resistance tests were performed. The tests were preceded by a 5 min warm up on the cycle ergometer and as a rest criterion, a sociodemographic form and the questionnaires were applied.
The associations between the mean values of strength, fatigue resistance, work ability and dysfunction obtained from the symptomatic upper extremity were analysed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho). The correlation was classified as high (r ≥ 0.70), moderate (r ≥ 0.40 or r < 0.70) or low (r < 0.40) , adopting a 95% confidence interval. Besides that, the Wilcoxon test was applied to analyse the difference in strength between the symptomatic and asymptomatic upper extremity. The software used for statistical analysis was SPSS version 20.0™.
In all, 26 out of 27 participants were right-handed; 59.2% of participants reported pain/discomfort in the dominant upper extremity, and 40.7% of the participants reported it in the non-dominant upper extremity. A total of 37.0% of the participants reported bilateral pain, but we considered the side with the most relevant complaint for the correlation analysis. All of the participants predominantly used the upper extremities in their main functions but with different levels of effort; 62.9% of the participants performed work functions with dynamic muscle contractions characterized as “dynamic work” (cooking, cleaning, nursing and technical repair sectors). Most performed a high level of physical effort, including lifting/shifting loads with the upper extremities. The remaining 37.0% had static work characteristics with a low level of physical effort but with isometric muscle contraction maintaining the same position for prolonged periods (administrative sector and laboratory technicians).
There was a similar proportion of men and women aged between 26 and 59 years. By the IPAQ, 18.5% of the participants were classified as very active, 37.0% as active, 37.0% as irregularly active and 7.4% as sedentary. Data that characterise the sample are summarised in Table 1. Only 37% of the participants had comorbidities, and none of them were smokers.
By Nordic questionnaire, it was found that all participants had symptoms of the upper extremities for at least 12 months, with a predominance of symptoms in the shoulder (55.5%). In addition, 88.8% of the participants reported pain in other segments during the same period; 70.3% of the participants still complained of the same symptoms in the upper extremities in the last 7 days.
Pain intensity measured by the NPRS was classified as mild, and the QuickDASH-Br showed that participants had a low level of upper extremity dysfunction. In terms of FIT-HaNSA scores, a deficit of 50% in fatigue resistance was found in the symptomatic upper extremity when compared to the expected total time spent to perform the three tasks. These values are presented in Table 2.
In relation to the Work Ability Index, 7.4% of the participants were classified as low ability, 44.4% as moderate ability, 37.0% as good ability and 11.1% as excellent ability. Still on work issues, 55.5% of the participants reported long-term absenteeism due to musculoskeletal problems.
No significant difference between the symptomatic and asymptomatic side was found for isokinetic and isometric strength muscle testing (Table 3). Mean isokinetic strength values obtained for women ranged from 41.7 to 54.3% lesser than that for men. For women, the difference in hand grip strength was also 52.6% lesser than that for men (Fig. 6).
Muscle strength showed a significant correlation with FIT-HaNSA, except regarding to shoulder external rotation and elbow extension, with positive and moderate correlations for abduction, adduction, internal rotation and hand grip. Hand grip strength also showed a moderate negative correlation with upper extremity dysfunction. Table 4 shows the correlations obtained and the respective statistical significance level considering a 95% confidence interval (p < 0.05).
Our data showed a significant and moderate association between upper extremity fatigue resistance for all shoulder muscle strength movements, except for external rotation. We also observed a significant and moderate correlation between hand grip strength and upper extremity dysfunction. It is known that hand grip strength is correlated with different functional disorders of the upper extremity, such as rheumatoid arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, lateral epicondylalgia, stroke, traumatic injuries and neuromuscular diseases, and it is also strongly related to general health status [22, 40]. The sample of our study presented only one worker with upper extremity dysfunction related to rheumatoid arthritis, which was asymptomatic. To be included in the sample, they could have had pain or discomfort in the upper extremity over the previous 12 months, and for appraisal, the most affected side was considered. It is known that musculoskeletal pain can aggravate the development of muscle fatigue. A study observed that resistance training significantly improved muscle strength and reduced pain and disability, suggesting an association between fatigue resistance and strength in a sample of workers complaining of chronic pain in the upper extremities .
Even with a low level of upper extremity dysfunction and a satisfactory level of physical activity of this sample, these characteristics might not be enough for most participants to perceive that they had excellent ability to work. There was no correlation between upper extremity muscle strength and ability to work. A poor association between physical performance and work ability has also been observed by other authors . This can be explained by the fact that the ability to work is not only influenced by physical function but also by psychological, cognitive and social functioning. These risk factors are, in turn, affected by pain, and the association of these variables negatively interferes with the ability to work [23, 51].
Although mostly active, 70.3% of the sample was overweight or obese according to their BMI. Some studies suggest that pain and obesity are correlated, and this relationship can be measured by factors such as age, structural changes, inflammatory chemical mediators and mood and sleep disorders, all of which are potential markers of functional and psychological complications in chronic pain [2, 21, 41]. There seems to be a consensus in the literature that, when maximum muscle strength is normalised to body mass, obese individuals are weaker compared to non-obese individuals, especially in relation to the anti-gravitational muscles . This condition of decreased muscle strength can increase the risk of developing osteoarthritis and lead to functional limitations, especially in the elderly. Evidence also suggests that high levels of adiposity may impair agonist muscle activation in the young, adding to or leading to the functional limitation . A longitudinal study that followed kitchen workers showed that obesity was a risk factor for generalised pain . In addition, self-reported pain at different body segments may increase the risk of absenteeism and disability [21, 36]. These studies agree with our data sample, of which 55.5% of the participants reported long-term absenteeism due to musculoskeletal complaints. Musculoskeletal disorders in healthcare professionals and other workers are highly prevalent and associated with workload and ergonomics factors [13, 50].
The use of self-report questionnaires allied to performance tests can be useful as outcome measurements, which could form the baseline for clinical trials to address musculoskeletal conditions [3, 11]. Shoulder strength and hand grip strength were associated with the resistance to the upper extremity fatigue test (FIT-HaNSA) and can be applied in workers as dynamic and static muscle tasks . Nevertheless, many different factors such as glenohumeral elevation angles, exertion velocity  and body position  could interfere with results.
Our sample had a balance of men and women, and the results showed that women had almost half the strength obtained by men. These data corroborate with previous studies that observed that most of the muscle groups evaluated in men were 1.5–2 times stronger than those in women . A study that assessed normative clinical data for upper extremity strength of men and women, found significantly higher strength values in men for all muscle groups evaluated in the upper extremities, and also observed that the dominant side was stronger than the non-dominant side in both men and women . In our study, there was no significant difference in strength between the upper extremities. This may have occurred because the majority of the complaints of the study participants were in the dominant extremity.
Many issues may limit the ability to generalise these findings. The methodology used does not allow us to establish a predictive factor for upper extremity musculoskeletal complaints and muscle strength changes. In addition, the sample size did not allow the analysis of subgroups that would consider the individuality of each worker profile in terms of magnitude and characteristics of effort, besides from being a factor that could overestimate the findings of the study. There were also no detailed analyses of the association of self-reported pain and ergonomic conditions of the work environment or on other risk factors, which would be relevant, considering that the ability to work could be influenced by these aspects [7, 58].
Our findings suggested that hand grip and shoulder abduction and adduction isokinetic strength could be outcome measurements of particular relevance for the development of assessment protocols for pre-interventions focused on prevention of the development of musculoskeletal complaints in the upper extremity related to work, through muscle conditioning exercises to improve upper extremity strength and fatigue resistance.
Individual, psychosocial and organizational risk factors must also be considered to influence upper extremity physical dysfunction and ability to work. A multifaceted approach focused on improving physical conditions, as well as psychosocial/organizational, ergonomics and environmental aspects of work must be addressed [26, 58].
Shoulder abduction, adduction and internal rotation strength were associated with upper extremity fatigue resistance. Also, hand grip strength was associated with upper extremity dysfunction and fatigue resistance. No association was found with the to Work Ability Index in this sample. In this way, it is suggested that hand grip and shoulder strength could be outcome measurements to be used for future interventions focused on preventive exercises to improve strength and fatigue resistance of the upper extremities of workers at risk for the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Other individual, psychosocial and organizational risk factors must also be considered as influences on upper extremity physical function.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author as additional files.
Activities of daily living
American Society of Therapists of Hand
Body Mass Index
Disabilities of the Arm Sholder and Hand
Functional Impairment test Hand/Neck/Shoulder and Arm
International Physical Activity Questionnaire
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Work Ability Index
Andersen LL, Christensen KB, Holtermann A, Poulsen OM, Sjøgaard G, Pedersen MT, et al. Effect of physical exercise interventions on musculoskeletal pain in all body regions among office workers: a one- year randomized controlled trial. Man Ther. 2010;15(1):100–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2009.08.004.
Arranz LI, Rafecas M, Alegre C. Effects of obesity on function and quality of life in chronic pain conditions. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014;16(1):390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-013-0390-7.
Baldwin JN, McKay MJ, Hiller CE, Moloney N, Nightingale EJ, Burns J. Relationship between physical performance and self-reported function in healthy individuals across the lifespan. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;30:10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.05.001.
Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Aasa U, Angquist KA, Johansson H. Prediction of development of fatigue during a simulated ambulance work task from physical performance tests. Ergonomics. 2004;47(11):1238–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130410001714751.
Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1038–46. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02060.
Buckle PW, Devereux JJ. The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(3):207–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00014-5.
Chiasson ME, Imbeau D, Major J, Aubry K, Delisle A. Influence of musculoskeletal pain on worker’s ergonomic risk-factor assessment. Appl Ergon. 2015;49:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.011.
da Luz EMF, de Souza Magnago TSB, Greco PBT, Dal Ongaro J, Lanes TC, Lemos JC. Prevalence and factors associated with musculoskeletal pain in hospital cleaning workers. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2017;26:1–10.
Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bartels EM, Bülow PM, Stockmarr A, Holm CC, Wätjen I, et al. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2009;197:1–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.02022.x.
da Silva NC, Chaves TC, Dos Santos JB, Sugano RMM, Barbosa RI, Marcolino AM, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of Brazilian version of QuickDASH. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;48:102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102163.
Descatha A, Roquelaure Y, Caroly S, Evanoff B, Cyr D, Mariel J, et al. Self-administered questionnaire and direct observation by checklist: comparing two methods for physical exposure surveillance in highly repetitive tasks plant. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(2):194–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.001.
Domholdt E. Physical therapy research: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
Dong H, Zhang Q, Liu G, Shao T, Xu Y. Prevalence and associated factors of musculoskeletal disorders among Chinese healthcare professionals working in tertiary hospitals: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2557-5.
dos Santos EC, Andrade RD, Lopes SGR, Valgas C. Prevalência de dor musculoesquelética em profissionais de enfermagem que atuam na ortopedia. Rev Dor. 2017;18:298–306.
Edouard P, Codine P, Samozino P, Bernard PL, Hérisson C, Gremeaux V. Reliability of shoulder rotators isokinetic strength imbalance measured using the Biodex dynamometer. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(2):162–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2012.01.007.
Emerson SA, Finch D. The injured worker. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorckyk JM, Amadio PC, Felder SB, Shin EK, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–60. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Forthomme B, Dvir Z, Crielaard JM, Croisier JL. Isokinetic assessment of the forearm and wrist muscles. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2002;10(3):121–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/IES-2002-0099.
Forthomme B, Dvir Z, Crielaard JM, Croisier JL. Isokinetic assessment of the shoulder rotators: a study of optimal test position. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011;31(3):227–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.01005.x.
Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract. 2003;3(4):310–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03034.x.
Haukka E, Kaila-Kangas L, Ojajärvi, Miranda H, Karppinen J, Viikari-Juntura E, et al. Pain in multiple sites and sickness absence trajectories: a prospective study among Finns. Pain. 2012;154:306–12.
Horsley I, Herrington L, Hoyle R, Prescott E, Bellamy N. Do changes in hand grip strength correlate with shoulder rotator cuff function? Shoulder Elbow. 2016;8(2):124–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573215626103.
Hengstebeck E, Roskos S, Breejen K, Arnetz B, Arnetz J. Chronic pain disrupts ability to work by interfering with social function: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Pain. 2017;17:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.09.021.
Isosaki M, Cardoso E, Glina DMR, Di Creddo Alves AC, Rocha LE. Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among hospital food service workers in São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Saúde Ocup. 2011;36(124):238–46. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572011000200007.
Jacobs NW, Berduszek RJ, Dijkstra PU, van der Sluis CK. Validity and reliability of the upper extremity work demands scale. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(4):520–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9683-9.
Kaliniene G, Ustinaviciene R, Skemiene L, Vaiciulis V, Vasilavicius P. Association between musculoskeletal pain and work-related factors among public service sector computer workers in Kaunas County, Lithuania. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1281-7.
Kapandji AI. The physiology of the joints, volume 1: upper limb. Pencaitland: Handspring; 2000.
Kroemer KHE, Grandjean E. Fitting the task to the human. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis; 2001.
Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987;18(3):233–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-X.
Lomond KV, Côté JN. Shoulder functional assessments in persons with chronic neck/shoulder pain and healthy subjects: reliability and effects of movement repetition. Work. 2011;38(2):169–80. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2011-1119.
Ma CC, Gu JK, Charles LE, Andrew ME, Dong RG, Burchfiel CM. Work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the United States: 2006, 2009, and 2014 National Health Interview Survey. Work. 2018;60(4):623–34. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182770.
MacDermid JC, Ghobrial M, Quirion KB, St-Amour M, Tsui T, Humphreys D, et al. Validation of a new test that assesses functional performance of the upper extremity and neck (FIT-HaNSA) in patients with shoulder pathology. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-42.
Mahmud N, Kenny DT, Zein RM, Hassan SN. Ergonomic training reduces musculoskeletal disorders among office-workers: results from the 6-month follow up. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2011;18:16–26.
Marim EA, Lafasse R, Okazaki VHA. Global lateral preference inventory (IPLAG). Braz J Mot Behav. 2011;6(3):14–23. https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v6i3.178.
Martinez MC, Latorre MRDO, Fischer FM. Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the work ability index. Rev Saúde Pública. 2009;43(3):525–32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000017.
Mather L, Ropponen A, Mittendorfer-Rutz, Narusyte J, Svedberg P. Health, work and demographic factors associated with a lower risk of work disability and unemployment in employees with lower back, neck and shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:622.
Matsudo S, et al. International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ): study of validity and reliability in Brazil. Physical Activities Health. 2001;6(2):1–14.
McDonald AC, Savoie SM, Mulla DM, Keir PJ. Dynamic and static shoulder strength relationship and predictive model. Appl Ergon. 2018;67:162–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.004.
Nordander C, Ohlsson K, Akesson I, Arvidsson I, Balogh I, Hansson GA, et al. Risk of musculoskeletal disorders among females and males in repetitive/constrained work. Ergonomics. 2009;52(10):1226–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903056071.
Novaes RD, de Miranda AS, de Oliveira SJ, Tavares BVF, Dourado VZ. Reference equations for the prediction of handgrip strength in middle-aged and elderly Brazilians. Fisioter Pesqui. 2009;16(3):217–22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502009000300005.
Okifuji A, Hare BD. The association between chronic pain and obesity. J Pain Res. 2015;8:399–408. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S55598.
Pedersen MT, Andersen CH, Zebis MK, Sjøgaard, Andersen LL. Implementation of specific strength training among industrial laboratory technicians: long-term effects on back, neck and upper extremity pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):287. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-287.
Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Oberg B. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehab Med. 2001;33(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/165019701300006524.
Prentice WE, Voight ML, Hoogenboom BJ. Musculoskeletal interventions: techniques for therapeutic exercise. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
Rasotto C, Bergamin M, Simonetti A, Maso S, Bartolucci GB, Ermolao A, et al. Tailored exercise program reduces symptoms of upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders of metalworkers: a randomized controlled trial. Manual Ther. 2015;20(1):56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.06.007.
Ricco M, Signorelli C. Personal and occupational risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome in meat processing industry workers in northern Italy. Med Pr. 2017;68(2):199–209. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.00605.
Ris I, Søgaard K, Gram B, Agerbo K, Boyle E, Juul-Kristensen B. Does a combination of physical training, specific exercises and pain education improve health-related quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain? A randomized control trial with a 4-month follow up. Man Ther. 2016;26:132–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2016.08.004.
Roshanaravan B, Patel KV, Fried LF, Robinson-Cohen C, de Boer IH, Harris T, et al. Association of muscle endurance, fatigability, and strength with functional limitation and mortality in the health aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;72:284–91.
Shariat A, Cleland JA, Danaee M, Kargarfard M, Sangelaji B, Tamrin SBM. Effects of stretching exercise training and ergonomic modifications on musculoskeletal discomforts of office workers: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018;22(2):144–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.09.003.
Skovlund SV, Bláfoss R, Sundstrup E, Andersen LL. Association between physical work demands and work ability in workers with musculoskeletal pain: cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03191-8.
Smolander J, Sörensen L, Pekkonen M, Alén M. Muscle performance, work ability and physical functioning in middle-aged men. Occup Med (London). 2009;60:78–80.
Subramaniam S, Murugesan S, Jayaraman S. Assessment of shoulder and low back muscle activity of male kitchen workers using surface electromyography. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018;31(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00903.
Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Andersen CH, Jay K, Persson R, Aagaard P, et al. Effect of two contrasting interventions on upper limb chronic pain and disability: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2014;17(2):145–54.
Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Brandt M, Jay K, Aagaard P, Andersen LL. Strength training improves fatigue resistance and self-rated health in workers with chronic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4137918.
Tomlinson DJ, Erskine RM, Morse CI, Winwood K, Onambélé-Pearson G. The impact of obesity on skeletal muscle strength and structure through adolescence to old age. Biogerontology. 2016;17(3):467–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-015-9626-4.
Van Eerd D, Munhall C, Irvin E, Rempel D, Brewer S, van der Beek AJ, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders and symptoms: an update of the evidence. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(1):62–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-102992.
Van Harlinger W, Blalock L, Merritt JL. Upper limb strength: study providing normative data for a clinical handheld dynamometer. PM R. 2015;7(2):135–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.09.007.
Widanarko B, Legg S, Devereux J, Stevenson M. The combined effect of physical, psychosocial/organizational and/or environment risk factors on the presence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and its consequences. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(6):1610–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.018.
Yung M, Wells RP. Sensitivity, reliability and the effects of diurnal variation on a test battery of field usable upper limb fatigue measures. Ergonomics. 2016;60:923–39.
Zebis MK, Andersen LL, Pedersen MT, Mortensen P, Andersen CH, Pedersen MM, et al. Implementation of neck/shoulder exercises for pain relief among industrial workers: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(1):205. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-205.
Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).
Foundation for Support to Teaching, Research and Assistance at Clinics Hospital, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo (FAEPA).
Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the University of São Paulo of Ribeirão Preto Research Ethics Committee (No. 2,724,782, CAAE 89138818.1.0000.5440) in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. All participants signed an informed consent form before participating in the study.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fifolato, T.M., Nardim, H.C.B., do Carmo Lopes, E.R. et al. Association between muscle strength, upper extremity fatigue resistance, work ability and upper extremity dysfunction in a sample of workers at a tertiary hospital. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 508 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04256-y
- Upper extremity
- Muscle strength dynamometer
- Work capacity evaluation
- Chronic pain