Skip to main content

Human adipose-derived Mesenchymal stem cells, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, or their combination for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a first-in-man randomized controlled trial



Human adipose-derived Mesenchymal stem cells (HADMSCs) have proven their efficacy in treating osteoarthritis (OA), in earlier preclinical and clinical studies. As the tissue repairers are under the control of mechanical and biochemical signals, improving regeneration outcomes using such signals has of late been the focus of attention. Among mechanical stimuli, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has recently shown promise both in vitro and in vivo. This study will investigate the potential of LIPUS in enhancing the regeneration process of an osteoarthritic knee joint.


This study involves a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and single-blind trial based on the SPIRIT guidelines, and aims to recruit 96 patients initially diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis, following American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive Intraarticular HADMSCs injection with LIPUS, Intraarticular HADMSCs injection with shame LIPUS, or Normal saline with LIPUS. The primary outcome is Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of OA (WOMAC) score, while the secondary outcomes will be other knee structural changes, and lower limb muscle strength such as the knee cartilage thickness measured by MRI. Blinded assessments will be performed at baseline (1 month prior to treatment), 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months following the interventions.


This trial will be the first clinical study to comprehensively investigate the safety and efficacy of LIPUS on stem cell therapy in OA patients. The results may provide evidence of the effectiveness of LIPUS in improving stem cell therapy and deliver valuable information for the design of subsequent trials.

Trial registration

This study had been prospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry. registration number: ChiCTR1900025907 at September 14, 2019.

Peer Review reports


Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most significant causes of disabilities among people worldwide. OA affects more than 50 million adults in the United States yearly, resulting in a US$100 billion burden on the economy [1,2,3]. Current conventional therapies, including physiotherapy agents, pharmacologic interventions, and injections, aim to control pain and improve function; however, they remain unsatisfactory [4, 5]. Likewise, invasive procedures, such as arthroplasty, also have limitations [6, 7].

On the other hand, intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells showed promising results in improving the quality of life and prognosis of OA patients [8,9,10]. This is because the stem cells are able to migrate and attach to the damaged tissues, actively participate in the regeneration of articular cartilages, and reduce the concentration of prostaglandin in the synovial fluid [11,12,13,14].

The environment surrounding the cells can significantly affect tissue repair type and quality. Mechanical stimulation plays a key role in enhancing cell proliferation and differentiation [15, 16]. Several biophysical stimulation agents, including but not limited to electromagnetic fields, electric stimulation, and low-intensity ultrasounds, have exhibited promising effects in promoting stem cell proliferation and differentiation [17,18,19,20].

Among the available mechanical stimulation tools, the use of LIPUS in regenerative applications has increased sharply in recent years. LIPUS is presently applied in a variety of biomedical applications, such as physiotherapy, drug and gene delivery, bone fracture healing, and tissue repair [21,22,23]. Moreover, LIPUS is highly useful, because it is noninvasive, safe, and cost-effective.

Earlier studies presented LIPUS irradiation’s effectiveness in promoting osteogenesis and chondrogenic, inducing the differentiation of MSC, and improving cartilage repair in both in vivo and in vitro studies, which summarize in Table 1 [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

Table 1 in vitro and in vivo studies of the LIPUS effect on stem cells

Zhou et al. demonstrated that, in addition to accelerating and augmenting the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells, the combination of LIPUS and MSC implantation could prolong the preservation of MSC in vitro [31]. Likewise, Yamaguchi et al. revealed that the combination of the intra-articular injection of MSC and LIPUS showed better results in improving cartilage repair and subchondral reformation in vivo than single treatment [32].

In the present study design, we developed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the MSC and LIPUS combination among patients with knee osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that the combination of HADMSCs and LIPUS would promote the effectiveness of MSCs in knee cartilage regeneration more than a single-treatment approach.


Study design

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded study protocol, designed following the SPIRIT 2013 statement [33]. A summary of the trial is presented in Fig. 1. Patients will be recruited from the Tongji University Hospital (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) orthopedic and rehabilitation departments. Study participation will be promoted through the WeChat mobile application, media reports, and advertisements. Participants will undergo preliminary screenings according to the eligibility criteria. Eligible participants will be invited to take the baseline assessment to confirm that they meet the inclusion criteria and provide written informed consent to participate.The current study was approved by the Tongji Hospital ethics committee (TJ-IRB20180901) and prospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR1900025907). Written informed consent will be obtained before the patients’ enrollment. Evaluators and data collectors will be blinded as to the groups and treatment allocation.

Fig. 1

Study flowchart

Treatment groups will receive different treatment regimens as follows:

  • ❖ Group 1: Single intra-articular injection of 10* 106 HADMSCs with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for 20 min daily, 5 days a week, for up to 8 weeks.

  • ❖ Group 2: Single intra-articular injection of 10* 106 HADMSCs with shame ultrasound irradiation for 20 min daily, 5 days a week, for up to 8 weeks.

  • ❖ Group 3: Normal saline with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for 20 min daily, 5 days a week, for up to 8 weeks.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females aged 18 to 70 Years old.

  • Radiological diagnosis of osteoarthritis using the American College of Rheumatology criteria.

  • Radiological grading of Grade II–III osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee as determined by a qualified radiologist using the Kellgren and Lawrence system.

  • Medial or lateral compartment OA .

  • Less than 5 degrees varus or valgus knee deformity as measured by the long mechanical axis of the knee on x-ray.

  • A minimum pain score of equal or greater than 5/10 on a visual analogue scale (VAS)

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous meniscectomy/significant partial meniscectomy or other knee-related surgery within the last 12 months.

  • Previous intra-articular injectable therapies within the last 6 months.

  • The patients who have meniscus injury of knee joint need surgical repair.

  • The patients who have severe coagulation disorders or cardiopulmonary conditions.

  • The women who are pregnant or nursing.

  • There are electronic implants such as pacemakers in the body.

  • The patients who are infected the HIV, the virus of hepatitis or syphilis or Bleeding disorders.

  • The patients with severe cognitive impairment who cannot follow instructions to complete the treatment.

  • History of cancer.

  • Immunodeficiency patients.

  • History of systemic illness or significant organ impairment/failure (i.e., renal failure).

  • The patients who have congenital or acquired knee malformation.

  • Patients or researchers who are participating in other clinical trials believe that other reasons are not appropriate for clinical trials.


Participants will be randomly allocated to one of the three groups in a ratio of 1:1:1. Patients’ allocations will be according to a randomly generated number using a computerized randomization table ( This table of randomization numbers will be provided only to specified personnel at the stem cell center. Moreover, using identical placebo procedures will ensure blinding and a central automated allocation procedure.


Blinding both participants and healthcare professionals is not feasible in this type of intervention. However, in order to minimize bias, the outcome evaluation will be standardized and done by well-trained investigators. Furthermore, the investigators and evaluators will be blinded to the group/treatment assignment. After completing the study, the statistician will present un-blinded data to the investigators.

Autologous HADMSC preparation

For this study, the researcher chose human adipose stem cells as the stem cell source. This is because human adipose stem cells can be easily isolated by a minor invasive approach and in larger quantities than bone marrow. Moreover, human adipose stem cells have a chondrogenic differentiation potential [34,35,36] In this study, all participants will undergo a lateral abdominal approach to abdominal liposuction harvesting. The participants will be given antibiotics as a prophylaxis course 1 day before and 4 days after the liposuction [37].

The procedure includes anesthesia of the lateral abdominal area. The anesthesia solution contains a tumescent fluid that comprises approximately 30–40 ml of (2%) lignocaine and 1 ml of 1/1000 adrenaline. The mixture will be buffered by 1 ml of 8.4% bicarbonate and then suspended in saline solution to a total of 1000 ml.

Up to 60 ml of adipose tissue and tumescent fluid will be exuded using a 4 mm lipo-aspiration canula. The aspirated subject will be placed in a sterile medical grade Shippert TissuTrans Collection filter (Shippert Medical, CO, USA). A certified and well-trained doctor will conduct the liposuction procedure and all participants will be checked after 1 week of cell harvest.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derivation

we will conduct the isolation and expansion procedure by following the method designed by Zuk et al. [38] The aspirated content in the filter will be treated in a fully sterile environment in a Biological Safety Cabinet (Class II) and obeying strict aseptic systems with (ISO 5) air quality at least. Moreover, all the equipment, reagents, and buffer will be sterile, validated, and qualified for cell culture use. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) will be isolated by enzymatic digestion followed by centrifugation.

Later, cell culturing will be accomplished under hypoxic conditions and using a standard growth medium (10% fetal bovine serum). The cells will be cultured to reach a confluency of about 80% and later passage 2 (P2). Upon reaching P2, the researcher will wash the cells to remove the fetal bovine serum. Then, HADMSCs will be suspended in a clinical-grade MSC cryoprotectant media and cryo-preserved by a clinical-grade cryoprotectant media [39, 40].

The cells will be detected via flow cytometry (FACS), which will be completed independently on all HADMSC samples using the four surface markers for the MSCs, as indicated by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) [41]. The researcher will also test the presence of MSC markers (CD44, CD 90, CD105, and CD 73) and the absence of hematopoietic surface markers (CD 34 and CD45). In addition, all HADMSC samples will undergo independent sterility testing for microbial growth or/and contamination.

Dosages including roughly 10* 106 MSCs each will be frozen separately in sterile cryovials in an approved cell cryoprotectant medium using a validated control rate freezing method and kept in liquid nitrogen until needed [40]. On the day of injection, one cryovial will be liquefied at 37 °C using a sterile water bath and then centrifuged to eliminate the cryoprotectant medium and add injectable sterile isotonic (0.9%) normal saline to a total of 3 ml. Cell count and viability will be established through the use of a Muse Cell Analyzer (Merck Millipore, USA).


HADMSC intra-articular injection technique

At the time of injection, the patient’s knee will be prepared following the standard sterile procedures. To ensure the accurate intra-articular placement of the needle, the injection will be carried out under continuous ultrasound guidance.

A total of 2 ml of (1%) lidocaine will be injected subcutaneously to reach the knee joint capsule and provide local anesthesia under aseptic settings. Then, roughly 10 million HDAMSCs will be injected into the intra-articular area using the superolateral patella approach. Patients in the sham injection treatment group will be injected an equivalent volume of sterile saline at the same interval of stem cells treatment group.

Ultrasound therapy

In the LIPUS treatment patients, LIPUS will be applied using an aqueous gel that does not include any pharmacological substances as a conduction medium. LIPUS will be applied in circular movements with the applicator probe at right angles to achieve maximum absorption of the energy. The treatment areas will include both the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral borders of the target knee on both the medial and lateral margins, making sure to avoid to patella.

Pulsed ultrasonic waves of (1 MHz) frequency and 0.5 w/cm2 intensity will be applied with a 5 cm diameter applicator probe for 20 min (Sonopuls 590, EnrafNonius BV, The Netherlands). On the other hand, patients in the placebo ultrasound treatment will receive the same number of treatment sessions of a similar duration as those in the experimental group. While the sham LIPUS treatment will only use inactive doses of LIPUS with an intensity of 0 W/cm2, along with the gentle application of an inert-gel for 20 min to the treated area [42, 43]. The placebo treatment protocol has been successfully examined in previous studies [44, 45].

Patients recruited to LIPUS will have the treatment once a day, 5 days a week for 8 weeks. All patients will be treated by the same therapist, who was not blinded to the treatment groups as the therapist will set the setting parameters.

Outcome assessments

All outcome assessments will be evaluated by well-trained investigators who are blind to the treatment/groups allocation. Moreover, another researcher will perform independent random cross tests. Assessments will be performed at baseline (1 month prior to treatment) and after 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months’ follow-up.

Primary outcome measures

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a widely-used scale in the assessment of OA. The successful application of WOMAC has proven its validity, reliability, and responsiveness in OA patients. Researchers have conducted a number of empirical studies have been conducted to estimate the MCID and PASS of the WOMAC in patients with OA. A 10-point numeric rating scale of WOMAC will be the primary outcome [46]. The WOMAC score will be normalized to a 100-point scale. In bilateral OA cases, when both knees meet the eligibility criteria, one of them will be treated and the WOMAC index will evaluate the same knee through the study period.

Secondary outcome measures

The secondary outcome measures are cartilage thickness measurement, visual analog scale (0 to 100 mm) for pain (VAS), a quality-of-life index (QLI), range of knee motion, muscle strength, global posture analysis system (GPS), and Likert scale. Moreover, the researcher will document safety records, including adverse events and serious adverse events, in addition to interventions and/or co-interventions, such as exercise, yoga, medication, and self-applied massage. Moreover, clinical examinations will be undertaken at the same intervals to document joint line tenderness warmth, effusions, erythema, and limitation in range of motion.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

As Previous studies have shown that tibial-plateau bone area associates with the development of osteoarthritis [47]. A three Tesla-MRI with volumetric 3D gradient and fast spin echo sequences will be performed. Osiris software (Digital Imaging Unit, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland) will be used in Image processing. The volume of the cartilage plates (femoral condyles, tibial plateaus and patellar) will be manually isolated from the total volume. Data will be resampled using bi-linear and cubic interpolation for the 3D interpretation, while Osteophytes, will not be involved in the area of interest.

The cartilage plate volume will be calculated by adding values of the pertinent voxels within the resultant binary volume. Moreover, Semi-quantitative measures of cartilage defects will be obtained using a modified International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score as it demonstrated in Table 2.

Table 2 modified International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score scale

Sample size calculation

The current study was designed to achieve 80% power overall to detect a 10-point change on the WOMAC between groups after 6 months (the significance level was set at 0.05). Based on an earlier study using a similar outcome measuring method with adding around 20% for the overall attrition rate. Thus a sample size of 96 (32 per group) will be used for estimating a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) [48].

The statistical hypotheses are:

H0: mean WOMAC Index (with LIPUS) = mean WOMAC Index (conventional).

HA: mean WOMAC Index (with LIPUS) ≠ mean WOMAC Index (conventional).

Statistical analyses

Data will be recorded in the case report form. The outcomes will be presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data analysis will be done using the SPSS version 24.0 statistical software. Comparing the outcomes between groups will be calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or an alternative nonparametric test if the conditions for parametric tests are not applicable.


Cellular-based treatments for OA are rapidly evolving, in this first-in-man protocol study design, we aim to compare the efficacy of LIPUS and Mesenchymal stem cells combination versus individual approaches. The study will provide data and guidance whether LIPUS-aided regeneration process will show a significant improvement in patients with osteoarthritis. Moreover, it offers an opportunity to develop the trial methodology for the evaluation of the putative role of LIPUS in human regenerative medicine and provide suggestions for the design of the following studies to demonstrate potential efficacy. We will attempt to standardize all treatment and outcomes measurement by performing it at the same time of the day by an instructed and supervised doctor.

To the best of our knowledge, the present study design will be the first randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of LIPUS-MSC combination to the individual treatment for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Availability of data and materials

The data set will be made available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.



global posture analysis system


Human adipose-derived Mesenchymal stem cells


International Cartilage Repair Society


low-intensity pulsed ultrasound


Mesenchymal stem cells




Quality-of-life index


Stromal vascular fraction


Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of osteoarthritis


  1. 1.

    Brooks PM. Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability? Social consequences and health economic implications. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:573–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fransen M, Bridgett L, March L, Hoy D, Penserga E, Brooks P. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis in Asia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2011;14:113–21.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gupta S, Hawker GA, Laporte A, Croxford R, Coyte PC. The economic burden of disabling hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) from the perspective of individuals living with this condition. Rheumatology. 2005;44:1531–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bijlsma JWJ, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FPJG. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet. 2011;377:2115–26.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tao J, Liu J, Tu Y, Hu K, Lin M, Guanli X, et al. Different types of exercise relieve pain symptoms of knee osteoarthritis by modulating the cognitive control network. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61:e127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Siparsky P, Ryzewicz M, Peterson B, Bartz R. Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: are there any evidence-based indications? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:107–12.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Röhner E, Windisch C, Nuetzmann K, Rau M, Arnhold M, Matziolis G. Unsatisfactory outcome of arthrodesis performed after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:298.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pak J, Lee JH, Kartolo WA et al. Cartilage regeneration in human with adipose tissue-derived stem cells: Current status in clinical implications. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4702674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xia P, Wang X, Lin Q, Li X. Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells injection for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2015;39:2363–72.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Abd-Elsayed A. Stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a comprehensive review. Pain Physician. 2018;21:229–41.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sekiya I, Muneta T, Horie M, Koga H. Arthroscopic transplantation of synovial stem cells improves clinical outcomes in knees with cartilage defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:2316–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Horie M, Driscoll MD, Sampson HW, Sekiya I, Caroom CT, Prockop DJ, et al. Implantation of allogenic synovial stem cells promotes meniscal regeneration in a rabbit meniscal defect model. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 2012;94:701–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sofia V, Bachri MS, Endrinaldi E. The influence of Mesenchymal stem cell Wharton jelly toward prostaglandin E2 gene expression on Synoviocyte cell osteoarthritis. Open access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:1252.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Leijs MJC, van Buul GM, Verhaar JAN, Hoogduijn MJ, Bos PK, van Osch GJVM. Pre-treatment of human mesenchymal stem cells with inflammatory factors or hypoxia does not influence migration to osteoarthritic cartilage and synovium. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1151–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yeatts AB, Choquette DT, Fisher JP. Bioreactors to influence stem cell fate: augmentation of mesenchymal stem cell signaling pathways via dynamic culture systems. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-General Subj. 2013;1830:2470–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li D, Zhou J, Chowdhury F, Cheng J, Wang N, Wang F. Role of mechanical factors in fate decisions of stem cells. Regen Med. 2011;6:229–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ongaro A, Pellati A, Bagheri L, Fortini C, Setti S, De Mattei M. Pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulate osteogenic differentiation in human bone marrow and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014;35:426–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Luo F, Hou T, Zhang Z, Xie Z, Wu X, Xu J. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field frequencies on the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e526–31.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ceccarelli G, Bloise N, Mantelli M, Gastaldi G, Fassina L, Cusella De Angelis MG, et al. A comparative analysis of the in vitro effects of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment on osteogenic differentiation of two different mesenchymal cell lineages. Biores Open Access. 2013;2:283–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Uddin SMZ, Qin Y-X. Enhancement of osteogenic differentiation and proliferation in human mesenchymal stem cells by a modified low intensity ultrasound stimulation under simulated microgravity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73914.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Koeke PU, Parizotto NA, Carrinho PM, Salate ACB. Comparative study of the efficacy of the topical application of hydrocortisone, therapeutic ultrasound and phonophoresis on the tissue repair process in rat tendons. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:345–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mitragotri S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:255.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Heybeli N, Yeşildağ A, Oyar O, Gülsoy UK, Tekinsoy MA, Mumcu EF. Diagnostic ultrasound treatment increases the bone fracture–healing rate in an internally fixed rat femoral osteotomy model. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:1357–63.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ikeda K, Takayama T, Suzuki N, Shimada K, Otsuka K, Ito K. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on the differentiation of C2C12 cells. Life Sci. 2006;79:1936–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Schumann D, Kujat R, Zellner J, Angele MK, Nerlich M, Mayr E, , et al.. Treatment of human mesenchymal stem cells with pulsed low intensity ultrasound enhances the chondrogenic phenotype in vitro. Biorheology. 2006;43:431–443.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Patron LP, Doughty ES, Jones DG. The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on autologous osteochondral plugs in a canine model. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1733–41.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Angle SR, Sena K, Sumner DR, Virdi AS. Osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells by various intensities of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasonics. 2011;51(3):281–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cui JH, Park SR, Park K, Choi BH, Min B. Preconditioning of mesenchymal stem cells with low-intensity ultrasound for cartilage formation in vivo. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:351–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jiang T, Xu T, Gu F, Chen A, Xiao Z, Zhang D. Osteogenic effect of low intensity pulsed ultrasound on rat adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. J Huazhong U Sci-Med. 2012;32(1):75–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jang KW, Ding L, Seol D, Lim TH, Buckwalter JA, Martin JA. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound promotes chondrogenic progenitor cell migration via focal adhesion kinase pathway. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40(6):1177–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhou X, Castro NJ, Zhu W, Cui H, Aliabouzar M, Sarkar K, et al. Improved human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis in 3D bioprinted tissue scaffolds with low intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32876.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yamaguchi S, Aoyama T, Ito A, Nagai M, Iijima H, Tajino J, et al. Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound after mesenchymal stromal cell injection to treat osteochondral defects: an in vivo study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:2903–13.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cao M, Pan Q, Dong H, Yuan X, Li Y, Sun Z, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve glucose homeostasis in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Alvarez-Viejo M, Menendez-Menendez Y, Blanco-Gelaz MA, Ferrero-Gutierrez A, Fernandez-Rodriguez MA, Gala J, et al. Quantifying mesenchymal stem cells in the mononuclear cell fraction of bone marrow samples obtained for cell therapy. Transplant Proc. 2013;45:434–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Peng L, Jia Z, Yin X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Chen P, et al. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, cartilage, and adipose tissue. Stem Cells Dev. 2008;17:761–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Messingham MJ, Arpey CJ. Update on the use of antibiotics in cutaneous surgery. Dermatologic Surg. 2005;31:1068–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zuk PA, Zhu MIN, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, et al. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:211–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Goh BC, Thirumala S, Kilroy G, Devireddy RV, Gimble JM. Cryopreservation characteristics of adipose-derived stem cells: maintenance of differentiation potential and viability. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007;1:322–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Martinello T, Bronzini I, Maccatrozzo L, Mollo A, Sampaolesi M, Mascarello F, et al. Canine adipose-derived-mesenchymal stem cells do not lose stem features after a long-term cryopreservation. Res Vet Sci. 2011;91:18–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, Krause DS, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bennell K, Wee E, Coburn S, Green S, Harris A, Staples M, et al. Efficacy of standardised manual therapy and home exercise programme for chronic rotator cuff disease: randomised placebo controlled trial. Bmj. 2010;340:c2756.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Celik D, Atalar AC, Sahinkaya S, Demirhan M. The value of intermittent ultrasound treatment in subacromial impingement syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43:243–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Villafañe JH, Silva GB, Bishop MD, Fernandez-Carnero J. Radial nerve mobilization decreases pain sensitivity and improves motor performance in patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:396–403.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Villafañe JH, Silva GB, Chiarotto A. Effects of passive upper extremity joint mobilization on pain sensitivity and function in participants with secondary carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a case series. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2012;35:735–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Stucki G, Meier D, Stucki S, Michel BA, Tyndall AG, Dick W, et al. Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster universities) arthrosis index. Z Rheumatol. 1996;55:40–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wang Y, Wluka AE, Cicuttini FM. The determinants of change in tibial plateau bone area in osteoarthritic knees: a cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:R687.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lee W, Kim HJ, Kim K, Kim GB, Jin W. Intra-articular injection of autologous adipose tissue-derived Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a phase IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8:504–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Our thanks to all the team at Tongji Hospital and research center where the trial will take place.


The National Natural Science Foundation supports this work. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Moreover, an external peer-review took place during the funding process.

Author information




MN and HC designed the study and wrote the manuscript. MN and CG provided methodological advice for the design of the study. HL and MN made the designs of the statistical analysis. All authors provided critical revisions to the report and final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Hong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research follows the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital (certificate of approval number (TJ-IRB20180901).

Consent for publication

Written consent was received from all participants to publicly share the results of the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasb, M., Liangjiang, H., Gong, C. et al. Human adipose-derived Mesenchymal stem cells, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, or their combination for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a first-in-man randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21, 33 (2020).

Download citation


  • Stem cells
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Pain
  • Low-intensity ultrasound
  • Knee
  • Musculoskeletal
  • Regenerative medicine