Skip to main content

Low back pain among nurses working in clinical settings of Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 years of studies

Abstract

Background

Nurses in Africa are arguably the most important frontline healthcare workers available in most healthcare facilities, performing a broad range of tasks. Such tasks are considerably presumed in the causation of workload. Nursing is listed among the highly risky professions for developing low back pain. The nursing profession is ranked within the top ten professions which have a great risk of low back pain. Hence, this review aimed to ascertain whether low back pain is a significant concern for nurses in African healthcare facilities.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of different databases with no date limit was conducted from September to November 2018 using the PRISMA guideline. The quality of the included studies was assessed using a 12-item rating system. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Cochran’s Q and the I2 test were used to assess heterogeneity. The presence of publication bias was evaluated by using Egger’s test and visual inspection of the symmetry in funnel plots.

Result

In this review, 19 studies from different African regions with a total sample size of 6110 nurses were included. All the studies were carried out between 2000 and 2018. Among these, the lowest and the highest prevalence were found to be 44.1 and 82.7% respectively. The estimation of the prevalence rate of low back pain among nurses using the random-effects model was found to be 64.07% (95% CI: 58.68–69.46; P-value < 0.0001). Heterogeneity of the reviewed studies was I2 = 94.2% and heterogeneity Chi-squared = 310.06 (d.f = 18), P-value < 0.0001. The subgroup analyses showed that the highest prevalence of LBP among nurses was from West African region with prevalence rates of 68.46% (95% CI: 54.94–81.97; P-value < 0.0001) and followed by North Africa region with prevalence rate of 67.95% (95% CI: 55.96–79.94; P-value < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Even though the overall prevalence of the present study is lower when compared to the Western and Asian studies, it indicated that the prevalence of low back pain among nurses is substantial.

Peer Review reports

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal disorders [1]. It is a neglected health problem responsible for serious suffering and disability among nurse professionals [2]. LBP accounted for an average number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) higher than different infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, and road traffic injuries. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010, LBP was reported among the top ten high burden diseases and injuries [3].

Due to the nature of their work healthcare providers are prone to experience lower back pain. On this regard, hospital nurses are groups of healthcare workers who suffered a lot from it [4,5,6]. The incidence varies between professions and countries [7, 8]. The incidence of LBP being considerably high among nurses working in many healthcare facilities mainly in hospital settings [9].

Nurses are arguably the most important frontline healthcare professionals available in most African healthcare facilities, performing a broad range of tasks. They carried out their activities in settings where no other health workers are available [10]. Such tasks are considerably presumed in causing workload. Due to these and other reasons, nursing is listed among the highly risky professions to experience LBP. In line with this, the nursing profession is ranked within the top ten professions which have a great risk of LBP [11,12,13,14].

In their day to day practice, nurses are subjected to lift and transport patients or equipment. They often perform such tasks in difficult environment particularly in developing nations where lifting aids are not available or practicable [15,16,17,18,19]. Such tasks bring a strenuous effect on the back and leads to nurses to experience different musculoskeletal complaints [20]. Biomechanical investigations reported that much strenuous activities on the back results in high spinal load [21].

Low back pain affects nurses’ productivity at work and consequently reduces the overall quality of healthcare the clients receive [22,23,24,25,26,27]. In addition, LBP will have many negative impact on different aspects of the healthcare system including healthcare workers’ absence from workplace, loss of optimal performance, low job satisfaction, rising medical costs and occupational disability [28].

A survey study on nurses revealed that hospital staff nurses lost 750,000 days a year as a result of back pain [18]. A study done in America with regards to workdays lost due to LBP revealed nurses were ranked the sixth highest to lose their working days from a job [29].

To the researchers’ knowledge, no prior systematic review and meta-analysis work on the prevalence of LBP among nurses in Africa. Hence, the objective of the current review was to thoroughly evaluate peer-reviewed published studies on the reported prevalence of LBP among nurses working at different African healthcare facilities. This would help us to ascertain whether LBP is a significant concern for nurses in the African healthcare facilities.

Method

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using studies that addressed low back pain among nurses working at different African healthcare facilities. The review was presented using the PRISMA guideline [30].

Search strategy

To conduct this study, all potentially relevant articles and grey literatures were comprehensively searched from September to November 2018 with no date limit. PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Google Scholar, CINHAL, ProQuest, African Index Medicus (AIM) and African Journals Online databases were searched using the following search terms: “Burden”, “Magnitude”, “Prevalence”, “Incidence” “Low back pain”, “Musculoskeletal problem”, “Back hygiene”, “Nursing”, “Nurses”, “Professional nurses”, “Registered nurses”, “Hospitals”, “Healthcare facilities” and “Africa”. Search strings were developed using “AND” and “OR” Boolean operators. In addition to the electronic database searches, a secondary search using the list of cited references from the included studies was also considered to identify additional articles.

Eligibility criteria

Primary researches reported the prevalence of LBP among nurses working at different African healthcare facilities using a 12-month recall period were included. Studies were not restricted by time of study but they should be written or published using English language. Thesis reports, dissertations, and proceedings/conferences that reported the outcome variable were also considered in our search. Studies were excluded if the article was program evaluation, not full text and not published using English language.

Operational definition

Musculoskeletal disorders: They are described as any pain and/or discomfort that affect the human body’s movement or musculoskeletal system. Low Back Pain (LBP) was operationally defined a pain in the lower back between L1 - L5 and L5-S1 [31]. Prevalence of low back pain: A 12-month recall period was used for experiencing low back pain, as this has been shown to be an appropriate time-scale in other studies [32].

Data extraction

The title and abstract of the studies were screened based on the preset criteria. Retrieved articles were assessed based on their title, overall objectives, and methodology. Irrelevant and duplicate articles were removed and the full text of the remaining articles that fulfilled the preset criteria were reviewed for inclusion.

To extract the data, a form was prepared that contains: Author names, year of publication, country, region in the continent, setting, study design, sample size, gender, mean age, measurement, and prevalence of LBP. The extraction was done by three independent researchers (ASK, YW, and EA). When there was disagreement between them, a thorough discussion was made and if there was still any disagreement, the fourth author (WA) was consulted.

Study quality assessment

To assess the quality of the included studies, in the current study a modified critical appraisal tool was utilized. This tool comprises three methodological tests encompassing 12 distinct conditions for prevalence studies. Three questions assess sample representativeness of the target population, six questions assess data quality, and the remaining three questions assess the definition of the outcome variable. Based on this, studies having at least 75% of the total score were acceptable [31, 33,34,35] to be included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (Appendix).

Statistical analysis procedure

Data analysis were performed using STATA version 11 software and P-value < 0.05 significance level was considered. The weight given to each study was assigned according to the inverse of the variance. Cochrane Q and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity among studies. Heterogeneity was measured by I2 and divided into four categories; no heterogeneity (0%), low (25–50%), moderate (50–75%), and high (> 75%) [36].

Subgroup analysis and meta-regression (the relationship between the years of the study and region in the continent with the prevalence rate) were employed to explore the cause of heterogeneity between studies. Funnel plot (Begg’s test) and Egger’s statistics with pseudo 95% confidence interval were used to examine publication bias.

Result

Until December 10, 2018 418 articles were identified. All articles were reviewed and 361 irrelevant and duplicate studies were excluded. The full texts of the remaining 57 articles were reviewed in detail. Finally, 19 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram on prevalence of Low Back Pain (LBP) among nurses working at different healthcare facilities in Africa, 2018

Critical appraisal result of the included studies

Criterion number 8 and 9 in the selected critical appraisal instrument were not applicable for most studies except studies done by [37] as they utilized both interview and physical examination techniques to gather the data. Studies were done by [25, 38, 39] utilized both self-administered questionnaire and physical examination so that they utilized criterion number 9 as a critical appraisal. All the included studies for this systematic review and meta-analysis were methodologically assessed and they satisfied the indicated criteria (Table 1).

Table 1 Critical appraisal result of the included studies, 2018

Based on the inclusion criteria, 19 studies [15, 20, 22, 25, 37,38,39, 52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62] were included in the final analysis. All the studies were done using a cross-sectional study design. Even if some studies [15, 22, 25, 61] failed to report the number of male and female participants clearly most of the study participants were females. One study indicated that only female nurse participants were included to their study [38]. The sample size of the studies ranged between 80 from a study done in Nigeria [54] and 880 from Uganda [59]. Concerning to the study facility, almost all studies were done among hospital nurses. Whereas one study from Ethiopia included nurse participants from both hospitals and health centers [37] (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics of included articles in the systematic review and meta-analysis, 2018

Prevalence of low back pain (LBP)

In this review, 19 studies from different African regions with a total sample size of 6110 nurses were included. All the studies were carried out between 2000 and 2018. From these 19 studies, the lowest and the highest reported prevalence of LBP were 44.1% [39] and 82.7% [22] respectively. Both the highest and the lowest prevalence of LBP were reported from a study done in Nigeria. The estimation of the prevalence rate of LBP among nurses using the random-effects model was 64.07% (95% CI: 58.68–69.46; P-value < 0.0001). Heterogeneity of the reviewed studies was I2 = 94.2% and heterogeneity Chi-squared = 310.06 (d.f = 18), P-value < 0.0001 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot of prevalence of low back pain among nurse in the African healthcare facilities, 2018

Subgroup analysis

According to the subgroup analyses, the highest prevalence of LBP among nurses was reported from West African region with prevalence rates of 68.46% (95% CI: 54.94–81.97; P-value < 0.0001) followed by North Africa region with prevalence rate of 67.95% (95% CI: 55.96–79.94; P-value < 0.0001). These two African regions had the highest prevalence of LBP as compared to their South African counterparts, 59.00% (95% CI: 53.34–64.65; P-value < 0.0001) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Subgroup analysis of low back pain among nurse using region of the continent in the African healthcare facilities, 2018

Meta –regression

Meta-regression analysis showed that there was no significant statistical relationship between the year of publication and the prevalence of the LBP (β = − 0.82, P-value = 0.808) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Funnel plot showing the relation between year of publication and prevalence of LBP among nurses working in different African health facilities, 2018

The meta-regression also showed that there was no significant statistical relationship between the sample size and the prevalence of LBP (β = − 0.007, P-value = 0.93) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Funnel plot showing the relation between sample size and prevalence of LBP among nurses working in different African health facilities, 2018

To assess publication bias, the funnel plot and Egger’s test were conducted in the meta-analysis. The funnel plot and Egger’s regression tests (β = − 0.0024, SE = 0.06, P = 0.96) showed that no evidence of publication bias for the included studies (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Funnel plot for assessing publication bias among studies

Discussion

Low back pain is a common work-related musculoskeletal disorder in healthcare workers. Particularly, it imposes high risk on nursing professionals working at different healthcare facilities mainly in hospital settings [63, 64]. Different studies have shown nursing personnel had higher prevalence of LBP relative to the general population or other occupational groups [41, 48, 65]. Such problems are reported in influencing the quality of life of healthcare professionals. This will, in turn, affects the healthcare quality [23].

This study denotes the first effort to report the prevalence of LBP among nurses working in healthcare facilities in the African continent. Hence, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pooled prevalence of LBP among nurses working at different healthcare facilities in African regions. By providing a comprehensive picture, this study would help to recognize the impact of the problem on nurse professionals in African countries.

Low back pain is a common occupational problem for nurses worldwide. LBP has been previously reported at rates between 45% in England [50], 63% in Australia [40]. Researches from Hong Kong and China also showed that nurses experience LBP about 40.6% [42] and 56% [26] respectively. Different African studies reported that LBP rates as 44.1, 79.4 and 82.7% [22, 39, 43, 44].

Literatures stated that the 12-month prevalence of LBP among nursing personnel is estimated to be up to 65% [45]. The result of the present systematic review and meta-analysis also showed that the overall 12-month prevalence of LBP among nurses was 64.07%. This finding was higher than from studies done in Iran that showed the overall prevalence of LBP among nurses was 61.2 and 60.98% respectively [31, 46]. Whereas studies in the Western nations and Asian countries revealed that the overall prevalence of LBP among nurses was higher compared to the present finding. Studies from Japan [47], Turkey [8] and the United States of America [49] showed that the overall prevalence of LBP among nurses was 91.9, 77.1 and 72.5% respectively. All the studies revealed that the existence of higher prevalence of LBP. Studies done in Switzerland [51] and Italy [66] also revealed that the overall annual prevalence of LBP among nurses was 73–76 and 86% respectively. This also confirms that there is a higher prevalence of LBP among nurses in the Western nations.

Studies done in the Western and in some Asian countries revealed that there is a higher prevalence of LBP among nurses. This finding is confirmed by different literatures in the subject area. A systematic review on LBP among Asian nurses revealed that the overall prevalence was 71.85% [67]. This high existence of LBP among nurses in the developed and in some Asian nations might be due the existence of high workload [68] for patient care, conducting advanced procedures that require prolonged standing. Such tasks all might lead nurses to experience LBP in their working environment. Studies also indicated that the prevalence of LBP was linked with both demographic characteristics of nurses, psychological factors and hospitals’ organizational factors [69]. In addition, the variation of the prevalence of LBP among studies might be accounted by variations in the tool utilized in assessing the outcome variable.

The results of this study identified the presence of a high prevalence of LBP among nurses in the Western region of Africa. In the present study, five different studies were incorporated from the Western region of Africa, all of them were from Nigeria, a country with the highest population in the continent. Coupled with a high population, with many patients and no enough healthcare providers these all will have their own impact on the countries healthcare system [70]. A report by Good Health Weekly revealed that Nigerian health professionals mainly nurses are experiencing high workload, burnout, stress, and demotivation from their work [70]. This all will cause nurses to experience LBP in one or in another way. Moreover, in the studies conducted in Nigeria, nurses were included from specialized and teaching hospitals. This, in turn, will have an additional workload on nurses that will expose them to suffer from LBP. The current review revealed variations in LBP among nurses working in the four regions of Africa. The variation was due to differences on having high client flow to the healthcare system [70] and nurses providing a broad range of tasks in such regions. But further researches are imperative to find out the possible route cause of LBP in each specific regions of Africa.

As mentioned in many literatures, nurses are the number one frontline healthcare professionals who contact clients in a variety of healthcare setups. This would have its own share to experience workload and consequently, they will be at higher risk of developing LBP.

Strength and limitation

The search was not restricted by time of study or year of publication. In addition, all possible findings from thesis report, dissertation, and any report proceedings/conferences in the subject matter were considered in our searches. As a limitation, adequate studies were not incorporated from some regions of the continent and even most of the studies were concentrated in a single country in each region of the continent. This might have its own shortfalls in producing the overall picture of the problem to the continent as a whole.

Conclusion

The overall prevalence of the present study is lower compared to the Western and Asian studies. The current finding indicated that low back pain is a significant concern amongst nurses in Africa.

The result may be helpful for hospital administrators and other concerned government agencies to implement measures in reducing the incidence of low back pain on nurses. The possible measures will include considering ergonomics solutions, stress reduction strategies, providing training for the nurses that can significantly reduce the risk of experiencing LBP. All the efforts made would improve nurses’ sense of belongingness, retention, quality of patient care and even organizational culture.

Availability of data and materials

All data are available in the manuscript.

References

  1. Cunningham C, Flynn TBC. Low back pain and occupation among Irish health workers. Occup Med. 2006;56(7):23–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamper SJ, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2015;350:444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vos T, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–20100: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lipscomb J, Trinkoff A, Brady B, Geiger-Brown J. Health care system changes and reported musculoskeletal disorders among registered nurses. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1431–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bejia I, Younes M, Hadj J, Khalfallah T, Ben K. Prevalence and factors associated to low back pain among hospital staff. Rev du Rhum. 2004;72:427–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhum.2004.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wong TS, Teo NKM. Prevalence and risk factors associated with low back pain among healthcare providers in a district hospital. Malays Orthop J. 2010;4(2):23–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson OEEE. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among workers in a health facility in south-South Nigeria. BJMMR. 2016;11(8):1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karahan A, Kav S, Abbasoglu A, Dogan N. Low back pain: prevalence and associated risk factors among hospital staff. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:516–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04905.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burdorf ASG. Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Env Heal. 1997;23(4):243–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Munjanja O, Kibuka SDD. The nursing workforce in sub-Saharan Africa.InThe global nursing review initiative. Geneva: Int Counc Nurses; 2005. p. 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson A, et al. Development and evaluation of a multifaceted ergonomics program to prevent injuries associated with patient handling tasks. Int J Nurs. 2006;43:717–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hllhlrnakl H. Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators. Scand J Work Env Heal. 1991;17:81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dlungwane T, Voce A, Knight S. Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain among nurses at a regional hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Heal SA Gesondheid. 2018;1:2071 Available from: http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/hsa/v23/04.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alexandre NMC, Angerami ELS, Moreira FD. Back pain and nursing. Rev da Esc Enferm da USP. 1996;30:267–85.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sikiru L, Shmaila H. Prevalence and risk factors of low Back pain among nurses in Africa: Nigerian and Ethiopian specialized hospitals survey study. East African J Pablic Heal. 2009;6(1):22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cesana G, Arduca A, Latocca R, SG. Risk evaluation and health surveillance in hospitals: a critical review and contribution regarding experience obtained at Garardo Dei Tintori Hospital in Monza. Med Med –Lav 1998. 1998;89(1):23–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vieira ER, Kumar S, Coury HJCG, Narayan Y. Low back problems and possible improvements in nursing jobs. J Adv Nurs. 2006;55(1):79–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Triolo PK. Occupational health hazard of hospital staff nurses. Part II physical, chemical and biological stressors. AAOHN – J. 1988;37(7):274–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gourmelen J, et al. Frequency of low Back pain among men and women aged 30 to 64 years in France. Results of two National Surveys. Ann Réadaptation Médecine Phys. 2007;50:640–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.05.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanui BC. Assessment of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Nurses in Mombasa County, Kenya; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tate RB, Yassi A, Cooper J. Predictorsof time loss after Back injury in nurses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:1930–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Farooq MA, Awwal LM, Musa HA, Mustapha GA. Work-related risk factors for lower Back pain among nurses in Ahmadu Bello University teaching hospital ( ABUTH ), Zaria-Nigeria. IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci. 2015;4(3):20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Punnett L, Wegman D. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Castro A. Handle with care: the American Nurses Association’s campaign to address work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Online J Issues Nurs. 2004;9(3):10–2.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Boughattas W, Maalel O, El MM, Bougmiza I. Low Back pain among nurses: prevalence , and occupational risk factors. Occup Dis Environ Med. 2017;5:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.05.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith DR, Wei N, Kang L, Wang RS. Musculoskeletal disorders among professional nurses in mainland China. J Prof Nurs. 2004;20(6):390–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holder N, et al. Cause, prevalence, and response to occupational musculoskeletal injuries reported by physical therapists and physical therapist assistants. Phys Ther. 2009;79(7):45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Asadi P, Monsef Kasmaei V, Zia Ziabari SZB. The prevalence of low back pain among nurses working in Poursina hospital in Rasht, Iran. J Emerg Pr Trauma. 2016;2(1):11–5. https://doi.org/10.15171/jept.2015.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Salvi Shah BD. Prevalence of low Back pain and its associated risk factors among doctors in Surat. Int J Heal Sci Res. 2012;2(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DGPG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.

  31. Azizpour Y, Delpisheh A, Montazeri Z, Sayehmiri K. Prevalence of low back pain in Iranian nurses : a systematic review and meta- analysis. BMC Nurs. 2017;16(50):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0243-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chiou WK, Wong MKLY. Epidemiology of low back pain in Chinese nurses. Int J Nurs Stud. 1994;31(4):361–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Walker BF. The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(3):205–2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mousavi SJ, et al. Low back pain in Iran: a growing need to adapt and implement evidencebased practice in developing countries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(10). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fa1da2.

  35. Louw QA, Morris LDG-SK. The prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8(105) Available from: 10. 1186/1471-2474-8-105.

  36. Ades AE, Lu GHJ. The interpretation of random-effects metaanalysis in decision models. Med Decis Mak. 2005;25:646–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Institutions H, Yitayeh A, Mekonnen S, Fasika S, Gizachew M. Emergency medicine: open access annual prevalence of self-reported work related musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among nurses working at Gondar town governmental health Institutions, Northwest Ethiopia. Emerg Med (Los Angel). 2015;5(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  38. El-soud AMA, El-najjar AR, El-fattah NA, Hassan AA. Prevalence of low back pain in working nurses in Zagazig University hospitals: an epidemiological study. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil. 2014;41:109–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tinubu BMS, Mbada CE, Oyeyemi AL, Fabunmi AA. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses in Ibadan , south-West Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(12):6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lusted MJ, Carrasco CL, Mandryk JAHS. Self reported symptoms in the neck and upper limbs in nurses. Appl Ergon. 1996;27(6):381–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Matsudaira K, Palmer KTRI. Prevalence and correlates of regional pain and associated disability in Japanese workers. Occup Env Med. 2011;68:191–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yip Y. A study of work stress, patient handling activities and the risk of low back pain among nurses in Hong Kong. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2001;36:796–804.

    Google Scholar 

  43. TinubuBM MCE, FA OAL. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses in Ibadan, south-West Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fabunmi, AA. And Gbiri CA. Relationship between balance performance in the elderly and some anthropometric variables. Afr J Med Med Sci 2008;37(4):321–326.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Alzahrani H, Mackey M, Stamatakis E, Zadro JR, Shirley D. The association between physical activity and low back pain : a systematic review and meta- analysis of observational studies. Sci Rep. 2019;9(8244):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44664-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Soroush A. Musculoskeletal disorders as common problems among Iranian Nurses : a systematic review and Meta - analysis study. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9(27):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Smith DR, Kondo N, Tanaka E, Tanaka H, Hirasawa K YZ. Musculoskeletal disorders among hospital nurses in rural Japan. Rural Remote Heal J. 2003;241(3):1–7.

  48. Leighton DJRT. Epidemiological aspects of back pain: the incidence and prevalence of back pain in nurses compared to the general population. Occup Med. 1995;45:263–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Josephson M, Largerstrom M, Hagberg MHE. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job strain among nursing personnel: a study over a three year period. Occup Env Med. 1997;52:47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smedley J, Egger P, Cooper CCD. Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses. Occup Env Med. 1995;52(3):160–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Maul I, Läubli T, Klipstein AKH. Course of low back pain among nurses: a longitudinal study across eight years. Occup Env Med. 2003;60(7):497. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.7.497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dlungwane Thembelihle AV& SK. Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain among nurses at a regional hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Heal SA Gesondheid.. 2014;1–6. Available from: http://www.hsag.org.za. Accessed 25 Sept 2018.

  53. Belay MM, Worku A, SA, BLW G. Epidemiology of low Back pain among nurses working in public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. East Cent African J Surg. 2016;21(1):113–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Omokhodion, et al. Prevalence of low Back pain among staff in a rural Hospital in Nigeria. Occup Med (Chic Ill). 2000;50(2):1396354 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/occmed/article/50/2/107/1396354%0AF.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sikiru L, Hanifa S. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among nurses in a typical Nigerian hospital. Afr Health Sci. 2010;10(1):26–30.

  56. Lela M. The relationship between physical activity and low Back pain among nurses in Kanombe military hospital: University of the Western Cape; 2010.

  57. Thembelihle. Prevalence of Low Back Pain Amongst Nurses at Edendale Hospital A dissertation submitted to the Department of Public Health Medicine Nelson R . Mandela School of Medicine Durban , South Africa In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master in Pu. University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2010.

  58. Chandeu M. Work-related low Back pain among clinical nurses in Tanzania: University of the Western Cape; 2008.

  59. Munabi IG, Buwembo W, Kitara DL, Ochieng J, Mwaka ES. Musculoskeletal disorder risk factors among nursing professionals in low resource settings : a cross-sectional study in Uganda. BMC Nurs. 2014;13(7):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Belay MM, Worku A, SA Gebrie BW. Epidemiology of low back pain among nurses working in public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. East Cent African J Surg. 2016;21(1):139040.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Boukerma Z, Behlouli AL, Reggad M. Epidemiology of low back pain among nurses of the hospital of Sétif (Algeria). BMJ Occopational Environ Med. 2014;71(1):1–6 Available from: https://oem.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_1/A113.3%0A1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Chiwaridzo M, Makotore V, Dambi JM, Munambah N, Mhlanga M. Work - related musculoskeletal disorders among registered general nurses : a case of a large central hospital in Harare , Zimbabwe. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(315):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3412-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wilkinson WE, Salazar MK, Uhl JE, Koepsell TD, DeRoos RLLR. Occupational injuries: a study of health care workers at a northwestern health science center and teaching hospital. Am Assoc Occup Heal Nurs J. 1992;40:287–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Stubbs DA, Buckle P, Hudson MP, Butler PERP. Back pain in the nursing profession, part I: epidemiology and pilot methodology. Ergon. 1983;26:755–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Tosunoz IK. Low Back pain in nurses. Int J Caring Sci. 2017;10(3):1728–32.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Corona G, Amedei F, Miselli F, Padalino MP, Tibaldi SFG. Association between relational and organizational factors and occurrence of musculoskeletal disease in health personnel. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2005;27(2):208–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.7.497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ellapen TJ, Narsigan S. Work related musculoskeletal disorders among Nurses : systematic review. Ergonomics. 2014;4(4):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Shieh SH, Sung FC, Su CH, Tsai YHV. Increased low back pain risk in nurses with high workload for patient care: a questionnaire survey. Taiwan J Obs Gynecol. 2016;55(4):525–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Soylar P, Ozer A. Evaluation of the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in nurses : a systematic review. Med Sci. 2018;7(3):479–85.

  70. Vanguard. Shortage of medical personnel: Tougher times ahead for Nigerians. 2015. Available from: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/01/shortage-medical-personnel-tougher-times-ahead-nigerians-1/. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

No fund was obtained to carry out this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ASK was involved in the design of the study, data analysis, and interpretation of the findings, report writing, and paper preparation. YW & EA was involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data, and review of the report. WA approved the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final paper. All authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayele Semachew Kasa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 The critical appraisal tool utilized to assess the quality of the included studies

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasa, A.S., Workineh, Y., Ayalew, E. et al. Low back pain among nurses working in clinical settings of Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 years of studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21, 310 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03341-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03341-y

Keywords