Skip to main content

Abbreviated quantitative UTE imaging in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction



Existing ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE MRI) methods require prohibitively long acquisition times (~ 20–40 min) to quantitatively assess the clinically relevant fast decay T2* component in ligaments and tendons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical translatability of a novel abbreviated quantitative UTE MRI paradigm for monitoring graft remodeling after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.


Eight patients who had Graftlink™ hamstring autograft reconstruction were recruited for this prospective study. A 3D double-echo UTE sequence at 3.0 Tesla was performed at 3- and 6-months post-surgery. An abbreviated UTE MRI paradigm was established based on numerical simulations and in vivo validation from healthy knees. This proposed approach was used to assess the T2* for fast decay component (\( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \)) and bound water signal fraction (fbw) of ACL graft in regions of interest drawn by a radiologist.


Compared to the conventional bi-exponential model, the abbreviated UTE MRI paradigm achieved low relative estimation bias for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw over a range of clinically relevant values for ACL grafts. A decrease in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) of the intra-articular graft was observed in 7 of the 8 ACL reconstruction patients from 3- to 6-months (− 0.11 ± 0.16 ms, P = 0.10). Increases in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw from 3- to 6-months were observed in the tibial intra-bone graft (\( {\varDelta T}_{2s}^{\ast } \): 0.19 ± 0.18 ms, P < 0.05; Δfbw: 4% ± 4%, P < 0.05). Lower \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (− 0.09 ± 0.11 ms, P < 0.05) was observed at 3-months when comparing the intra-bone graft to the graft/bone interface in the femoral tunnel. The same comparisons at the 6-months also yielded relatively lower \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (− 0.09 ± 0.12 ms, P < 0.05).


The proposed abbreviated 3D UTE MRI paradigm is capable of assessing the ACL graft remodeling process in a clinically translatable acquisition time. Longitudinal changes in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw of the ACL graft were observed.

Peer Review reports


The most common knee injuries that require surgical reconstruction are anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears [1, 2]. ACL reconstruction usually uses bone-patellar tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts [3]. Tendon grafts are composed of densely packed collagen, proteoglycans and cells, but have a different ultrastructure and biochemical composition compared to native ligaments [4]. After ACL reconstruction, two major graft healing processes occur: “ligamentization” of the intra-articular graft and “tendon-to-bone healing” at the graft/bone interface. Ligamentization is the remodeling of the graft into a tissue similar to native ACL [5]. Tendon-to-bone healing involves the development of enthesis within the bone tunnel [6]. Although tendon-to-bone healing is well studied in animal models, the applicability of their findings to human grafts is not well documented [7]. The graft/bone interface is a primary site of weakness during the early postoperative period, which is the critical rehabilitation period for successful outcomes [8]. Due to large individual variations in graft healing and the lack of accurate assessment tools for individualized post-operative rehabilitation guidelines, the risk of re-rupture from overloading an inadequately healed graft ranges from 5 to 25% [9,10,11]. In this context, the development and validation of robust and objective biomarkers to evaluate the individual graft healing status is critical. These biomarkers may also aid in implementing optimal rehabilitation protocols to reduce the risk of graft re-rupture and to allow for quick return-to-play.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables non-invasive evaluation of ACL grafts with high tissue contrast, and has been widely used for detecting impingement and graft tears after ACL reconstruction [12]. However, conventional MRI techniques are very limited regarding the graft healing process. Contrast enhanced and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) MRI have been utilized to evaluate the revascularization and collagen remodeling of implanted grafts, respectively [13,14,15]. Most of these studies were only conducted at a single time point without longitudinal assessment. In connective tissues including tendons and ligaments, ultrashort echo time (UTE), variable TE (vTE) and DTI MRI have demonstrated the existence of multiple pools of tissue water with distinct MRI properties [16,17,18]. The fast decay short T2* (several 100–1000’s μs) component represents water tightly bound to the highly organized collagen structures, while the slow decay long T2* (several 10’s ms) component represents free tissue water [16, 19]. Therefore, analysis of the fast decay T2* component in ACL graft potentially reflects the underlying process of collagen remodeling during graft healing.

In previous studies of human Achilles tendon and cortical bone with UTE-based bicomponent T2* analysis, changes in the fast decay T2* component were linked to collagen disorganization and disruption of the structural integrity, while the slow decay long T2* component does not consistently correlate with clinical outcome [16, 20, 21]. The major challenge of the clinical application of the existing bi-exponential T2* method involves the sampling of the entire T2* decay profile with TEs ranging from several 10’s μs to ~ 20 ms [18], which requires multiple UTE acquisitions with a TR of at least 20 ms and a total acquisition time of ~ 40 min. Recently, protocols which take close to 20 min were reported [16, 22, 23] but are still too costly and time consuming, prohibiting routine clinical screening. In addition, ACL reconstruction patients are unlikely to tolerate such long MRI scans, especially for patients with painful complications.

In this study, we proposed and evaluated a novel abbreviated quantitative UTE MRI paradigm to characterize the fast decay short T2* (\( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \)) component during ACL graft remodeling. The accuracy and clinical translatability of the proposed abbreviated UTE paradigm was also evaluated by numerical simulation and in healthy subjects.



A total of 8 patients with primary unilateral ACL tears who underwent Graftlink™ HS autograft reconstruction were recruited between 2013 and 2016 following written informed consent for this institutional review board approved prospective study. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon and the grafts were placed in an anatomic position. Inclusion criteria were: primary unilateral ACL tear; greater than 18 years of age; existence of an MRI compatible construct. To investigate normal graft healing, potential factors which might make the knee unstable were excluded. Exclusion criteria were: concomitant lateral collateral ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, or posterior lateral corner injury; a greater than grade 2 medial cruciate ligament sprain; grade 3 Outerbridge classification changes in 1 or more compartments (as determined by initial arthroscopy); prior surgery (besides ACL reconstruction) to either knee; insufficient ACL in the contralateral knee. An additional 5 healthy subjects were recruited for validation and test-retest study. Images of healthy ACL and patellar tendon were acquired to assess the proposed abbreviated quantitative UTE paradigm.

MRI acquisition

MRI of the ACL graft was performed on a 3 T mMR PET/MRI (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel knee coil. All patients were imaged at 3- and 6-months post-surgery. In addition to conventional T1- and T2-weighted anatomical images, abbreviated UTE images were obtained. Instead of acquiring a complete set of 3D UTE images with large TE coverage for complete bi-exponential analysis, a reduced set of images with minimal TR were acquired to provide sufficient TE coverage to resolve fast decay \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) component. The T2* for the slow decay component (\( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \)) can be determined either from a separate conventional multi-echo gradient echo sequence or by adopting a pre-determined value. We further applied a slab selective RF excitation to reduce the field of view (FOV) along the slice-selection direction, thus reducing the number of views, so that each 3D UTE image was acquired within 2.5 min and the total UTE imaging time was below 8 min for clinical applicability. Most importantly, we adopted a baseline-corrected mono-exponential model to quantify \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) for the fast decay component and its signal fraction (fbw). Estimation bias of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw from this abbreviated model was corrected accordingly based on pre-calculated formulas from numerical simulations.

Our abbreviated UTE images composed of three sets of 3D double-echo UTE images with TE1/TE2 of 0.1/4.0 ms, 0.27/5.0 ms, and 0.5/6.0 ms. A center-out 3D radial projection k-space sampling strategy was used. To reduce TE, half Fourier readout was adopted at the first echo, and full Fourier readout was adopted at the second echo. Other imaging parameters were: FOV of 160 × 160 × 80 mm3; slab-selective excitation; voxel size of 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 with 80 views along kz direction; TR of 13 ms; flip angle of 15°; acquisition time of 2.5 mins. Three healthy subjects were recruited to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the abbreviated acquisition protocol. Subjects were scanned, removed from the MRI, and re-scanned ~ 30 min later. In addition, two healthy subjects were recruited to compare the abbreviated acquisition protocol with a full multi-echo UTE acquisition. This consisted of 5 sets of UTE images with TE1/TE2 of 0.1/4.0, 0.27/7.0, 0.5/10.0, 1.0/14.0 and 2.0/20.0 ms. All other parameters were the same except for a TR of 25 ms. A multi-echo gradient echo variable-TE (vTE) sequence [21] was used to quantify the long T2* in the two healthy subjects. The sequence parameters for vTE were: 3D-acquisition; FOV of 160 × 105 × 108 mm3; matrix of 128 × 84 × 36; slice oversampling of 22.2%; TR of 40 ms; flip angle of 20°; receiver bandwidth of 640 Hz/Px. The total acquisition time was ~ 3 min for TEs of 0.88, 3.24, 5.37, 7.5, 10, 13 and 19 ms.

Evaluation of the fast decay short T2* component

In ACL patients, the data acquired at the three TE1s (0.1, 0.27, and 0.5 ms) were fit with a baseline-corrected mono-exponential model. The constant baseline was estimated as the average signal from data acquired at the three TE2 s (4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 ms). Since the long T2* component has a T2* value of ~ 20 ms [19, 21], its signal decay during TE1s can be ignored (~ 3% at TE of 0.5 ms), and its contribution to the total signal can be approximated as a constant baseline. As such, the signal decay at the three TE1s can be attributed solely to the short T2* component and modeled by a single compartment mono-exponential decay function with a constant baseline. This leads to signification reduction of the total acquisition time to a level well-tolerated by ACL reconstruction patients (~ 10 min). However, this simplified model may lead to substantial parameter estimation bias. The estimation bias of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw will be corrected by utilizing results from numerical simulations. To differentiate the result from conventional bi-exponential fitting, apparent fast decay short T2* (\( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \)) and its signal fraction (fbw,app) were used to describe the baseline-corrected mono-exponential T2* decay of the MRI signal:

$$ S(TE)=\frac{baseline}{1-{f}_{bw, app}}{e}^{- TE/{T}_{2s, app}^{\ast }}+ baseline. $$

Numerical simulations and in vivo data from healthy knees were conducted to assess and correct the estimation bias of \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) and fbw, app using simulated T2* decay profiles from the standard bi-exponential model:

$$ S(TE)={S}_0\bullet \left[{f}_{bw}\bullet {e}^{- TE/{T}_{2s}^{\ast }}+\left(1-{f}_{bw}\right)\bullet {e}^{- TE/{T}_{2l}^{\ast }}\right], $$

Where S0 is the initial signal; fbw is the true bound water fraction; \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) are the true transverse relaxation time constants for the short and long components respectively. \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) varied between 0.5–2 ms and fbw varied between 0.25–0.95. Meanwhile, \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) took values of 15, 20, and 25 ms [19, 21].

Data analysis

Scanner raw k-space data for control subjects and ACL patients were imported into Matlab (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA) for image reconstruction and processing. All UTE images were reconstructed using a modified package from the MRI UNBOUND repository ( courtesy of Nick Zwart. Based on UTE data of a spherical phantom acquired at the same scanner, the adaptive gradient-delay compensation algorithm was utilized to calibrate the sample shift along the readout-direction at both echoes [24, 25]. After a standard 3D re-gridding of shift-corrected k-space data, reconstructed spatial UTE images acquired by different receiving channels were sum-of-squares combined.

Regional graft healing was assessed by manual placement of regions-of-interest (ROIs) along the ACL graft by an experienced musculoskeletal fellowship trained radiologist with 10 years of experience. The grafts were separated into three regions; femoral bone tunnel, intra-articular, and tibial bone tunnel. For each bone tunnel segment, the graft itself (intra-bone graft) and the interface between the graft and bone tunnel surface (graft/bone interface) were evaluated. The graft/bone interfaces were assessed by growing the intra-bone graft ROIs by 2 mm [13, 26] and removing any voxels contained within the graft ROIs. Since the ACL graft T2* decay profile is orientation-dependent (magic angle effect) [27,28,29,30], the relative angles between the graft segments and B0 field were determined by estimating the line of best fit through the centroid of each slice of the ROI in the x-y plane and calculating the angle between that line and B0. The \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) and fbw, app were estimated by averaging the signal within each ROI and fitting with the proposed method. For ACL reconstruction patients, \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw were calculated for each ROI after bias correction assuming \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value of 20 ms. Intra-rater reliability was assessed by having the same radiologist place the ROIs a second time. The relative error between \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw estimated with the two sets of ROIs and the Dice similarity coefficient between the two sets of ROIs were determined [31].

Statistical analysis

Parameters were tested for normality using the Lilliefors test; all parameters were normally distributed (P > 0.05). Two-tailed, paired t-tests were used for within subject comparisons of the \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \), fbw and relative angle with respect to B0 at 3- and 6-months post-ACL reconstruction surgery and between the 5 ROIs. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Numerical simulations and in vivo validation

The estimation bias of \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) and fbw, app using baseline-corrected mono-exponential model are shown in Fig. 1a and b respectively. Within clinically relevant \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (0.5 ms – 2.0 ms) and fbw (0.75–0.95) values for ACL graft (with \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) of 20 ms), the proposed abbreviated method is relatively robust with low mean relative estimation biases of ±3.7 and ± 3.4% for \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) and fbw, app respectively. The largest estimation bias for \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) occurred for small values of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw (up to 10% overestimation for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) of 0.5 ms and fbw of 0.75), and for large values of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw (up to 10% underestimation for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) of 2 ms and fbw of 0.95). The estimation bias for fbw, app was smooth over the range of simulated values that are clinically relevant for ACL grafts; largest estimation bias occurred for large values of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (up to 14% underestimation for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) of 2 ms and fbw of 0.75). As shown in Fig. 2, large estimation bias was observed in low fbw range (0.25–0.75). Over the simulation range of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (0.5 ms – 2.0 ms) and fbw (0.25–0.75), with \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) of 20 ms, the average relative estimation bias was ±22.9 and ± 42.7% for \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) and fbw, app respectively.

Fig. 1

\( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw estimation bias over a range of values clinically relevant for ACL grafts. The proposed baseline-corrected mono-exponential model for short T2* component evaluation was used for estimation of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (c) and fbw (d). The bias compares the estimated values of \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) (a) and fbw, app (b) to the simulated values of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw. All simulations assumed a \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value of 20 ms

Fig. 2

\( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw estimation bias over a large range of fbw values. The proposed baseline-corrected mono-exponential model for short T2* component evaluation was used for estimation of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (c) and fbw (d). The bias compares the estimated values of \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) (a) and fbw, app (b) to the simulated values of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw. All simulations assumed a \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value of 20 ms

The formulas for bias correction were derived from polynomial fitting (fourth order) of the estimation error for simulated data with a fixed \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) of 20 ms. After bias correction, the average relative estimation error for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw was reduced to ±0.01 and ± 0.07% respectively for \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) of 20 ms (Fig. 1c and d). Furthermore, the robustness of bias correction formulas (calculated fixed \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) of 20 ms) against \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) variations was assessed in simulated data with a true \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) different than the pre-fixed value of 20 ms. For true \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value of 15 ms, the average \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) relative estimation error after bias correction was ±1.0, ±9.4, and ± 7.1% for simulated fbw values of 0.75–0.95, 0.25–0.75, and 0.25–0.95, respectively. The corresponding average fbw relative estimation error after bias correction was ±1.4%, ±11.3, and ± 8.5% for simulated fbw values of 0.75–0.95, 0.25–0.75, and 0.25–0.95, respectively. For true \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value of 25 ms, the average \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) relative error after bias correction was ±1.0, ±6.5, and ± 4.9% for simulated fbw values of 0.75–0.95, 0.25–0.75, and 0.25–0.95, respectively. The corresponding average fbw relative estimation error after bias correction was ±1.7%, ±6.8, and ± 5.1% for simulated fbw values of 0.75–0.95, 0.25–0.75, and 0.25–0.95, respectively. \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) These results demonstrated that the bias corrected \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbwfbw values showed only limited sensitivity to the exact value of \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) for high fbw values. For low fbw values, it is necessary to have a separate gradient echo MRI acquisition for accurate quantification of \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \). The robustness of bias correction formulas was also assessed at different levels of SNR and the resultant estimation error after bias correction was compared to the estimation error of conventional bi-exponential fitting of full UTE data (Table 1). The resultant estimation error of the proposed approach was similar to that of the conventional bi-exponential method.

Table 1 Average values of estimation bias of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \), and fbw for abbreviated with proposed bias correction and full UTE over a range of SNR levels. Bias values are averaged over a range of clinically relevant \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (0.5 ms – 2.0 ms) and fbw (0.70–0.95) values for ACL grafts and a fixed \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value of 20 ms

Figure 3 illustrates UTE images and the corresponding model fitting of the ACL and patellar tendon signal for one of the healthy subjects imaged with 10 TE values. Data from the longest TE (20 ms) was not used because of low SNR. The results from native ACL and patellar tendon of two healthy subjects imaged with both the abbreviated UTE protocol and the full UTE (bi-exponential fitting) protocol are listed in Table 2. As expected, bias correction significantly reduced the estimation bias for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw in both ACL and patellar tendon. The estimation bias in healthy ACL is larger than the predicted bias in ACL grafts because of the large contribution (~ 60%) from slow decay \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) components in healthy ACL positioned near the magic angle. The relative estimation errors can be further reduced when a patient-specific \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value (based on vTE images) was adopted. For example, the relative errors for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw in ACL measurement were reduced from 24 and 7% to 13% and − 6%, respectively, when a vTE-estimated \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value of 14 ms was used for the first subject. Similarly, the relative errors for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw in patellar tendon were reduced from 9% and − 7 to 4% and − 2%, respectively, when a vTE-estimated \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value of 29 ms was used for the first subject.

Fig. 3

UTE images and signal fitting at TE of 0.1 ms (a) and 4 ms (b), corresponding signal decay with bi-exponential model fitting (blue lines) and baseline-corrected mono-exponential model fitting (red lines) for the ACL (c) and patellar tendon (d) for a healthy subject

Table 2 Average values of \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \), fbw, app, \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \), and fbw from 2 healthy subjects in validation study

The simulation and healthy knee results demonstrated that for high fbw (> 75%), estimation bias for \( {T}_{2s, app}^{\ast } \) and fbw, app is relatively small (~ 1–6%) after bias correction adopting a fixed \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value. Conversely, for tissues with low fbw (< 75%), the relative bias can be high (from ±23 to ±9% for \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and from ±43 to ±10% for fbw) after bias correction with a fixed \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value. To further reduce estimation bias, an additional subject-specific tissue \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) value, which can be estimated from conventional multi-echo gradient echo images, should be adopted in bias correction. The test-retest results from 3 healthy volunteer subjects are listed in Table 3. Overall, the proposed method achieved with ~ 1% deviation between the first and second scans for patellar tendon measurements and ~ 5% deviation between the first and second scans for ACL measurements.

Table 3 Average values of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw from 3 healthy test-retest subjects

ACL graft reconstruction

The operated knees of all ACL reconstruction patients were confirmed as stable and no complications were documented clinically. Figure 4a shows the UTE images at the 6 TEs for a representative ACL reconstruction subject. Compared to reconstructed UTE images from TE2 (full Fourier), the TE1 images (half Fourier) demonstrated lower SNR and some streaking artifacts due to reduced k-space sampling density along the kz direction. Nevertheless, the UTE images exhibited high contrast between different tissues, allowing for accurate delineation of the ACL graft, as shown in a sagittal and axial view of ACL graft (Fig. 5). The average signal and model fitting from the intra-articular region are displayed in Fig. 4b. The signal from the intra-articular graft demonstrated an exponential behavior over the three shortest TEs; accurate fitting of the data was achieved with \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) of 1.40 ms and fbw of 85%. Figure 6 displays the ROI selection for a typical subject. The ROIs demonstrated varying orientation along the ACL graft; the relative angles with respect to B0 in the femoral intra-bone, intra-articular, and tibial intra-bone graft segments were 41.6°, 34.1°, and 26.4° respectively. The fbw and \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) values at 3- and 6-months post-surgery in the 5 ROIs, as well as the relative angle in the 3 graft ROIs, from the 8 ACL reconstruction subjects are shown in Fig. 7, with the average values listed in Table 4. The results of intra-rater reliability are listed in Table 5.

Fig. 4

UTE images at the 6 imaged TEs (a) and the corresponding signal decay profile with baseline-corrected mono-exponential fitting from the intra-articular graft region (b) for a representative ACL reconstruction subject. Note that the TE2 images are scaled by a factor of 1.2 for display purposes

Fig. 5

Sagittal and axial UTE image with TE of 4 ms for a representative ACL reconstruction subject. The left column shows the images in the sagittal plane and the right column shows images from the axial planes denoted by the yellow lines in the sagittal plane images. The red lines delineate the ACL graft. The first row depicts the femoral intra-bone graft and graft/bone interface, the second row depicts the intra-articular graft, and the third row depicts the tibial intra-bone graft and graft/bone interface. The outlines of the ACL graft on the sagittal plane images have been shrunk by 2 voxels for illustration purposes. The ACL graft outlines on the axial plane images were not shrunk by 2 voxels. The ACL graft outlines on the axial plane images of the femoral and tibial graft tunnels are thicker than the ACL graft outlines on the axial plane image of the intra-articular graft because they include the graft/bone interface (outer 2 voxels)

Fig. 6

Regions of interest for a typical ACL reconstruction subject overlaid on the UTE image with TE of 4 ms. ROIs are color coded as follows: orange, femoral graft/bone interface; red, femoral intra-bone graft; yellow, intra-articular graft; green, tibial intra-bone; blue, tibial graft/bone interface

Fig. 7

Ladder plots of the \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \), fbw, and angle relative to B0 from 8 ACL reconstruction subjects at 3- and 6-months post-ACL reconstruction surgery

Table 4 Average values of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \), fbw, and angle relative to B0 from all ACL reconstruction patients
Table 5 Intra-rater reliability showing average values of the relative error of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw measurements and the Dice similarity coefficient from all ACL reconstruction patients

Analysis of intra-articular graft, “ligamentization”

The average \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw at the 3-month timepoint were 1.42 ± 0.18 ms and 82 ± 5%, respectively. The estimated values at the 6-month timepoint were 1.32 ± 0.15 ms and 79 ± 6%, respectively. A decrease in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) was observed in 7 of the 8 ACL reconstruction patients at the second time point compared to the first (− 0.11 ± 0.16 ms, P = 0.10). Meanwhile, almost no change in fbw (− 1% ± 7%, P = 0.76) was observed. A greater angle between the intra-articular graft and B0 was observed at the 6-month time point (31.6° ± 6.8° vs. 35.0° ± 4.3°, P = 0.07).

Analysis of intra-bone graft, “graft healing inside of the bone tunnel”

In the femoral intra-bone graft, the average \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw at the 3-month timepoint were 1.78 ± 0.37 ms and 90% ± 9%, respectively. The corresponding values in the tibial intra-bone graft were 1.43 ± 0.18 ms and 87% ± 5%, respectively. The values at the 6-month time point were 1.92 ± 0.46 ms and 93% ± 8%, respectively for the femoral intra-bone graft, and 1.61 ± 0.20 ms and 91% ± 4%, respectively for the tibial intra-bone graft. Significant increases in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw from the 3- to 6-month time point were observed in the tibial intra-bone graft (\( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \): 0.14 ± 0.14 ms, P < 0.05; fbw: 4% ± 4%, P < 0.05). Non-significant increases were observed in the femoral intra-bone graft (\( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \): 0.14 ± 0.51 ms, P = 0.46; fbw: 4% ± 9%, P = 0.29). No differences in the relative angle of the intra-bone grafts and B0 were observed between the two time points (47.3° ± 5.9° vs. 49.0° ± 7.7°, P = 0.54 for femoral intra-bone graft, and 24.6° ± 3.4° vs. 24.5° ± 3.4°, P = 0.97 for tibial intra-bone graft).

Analysis of graft/bone interface, “tendon-to-bone healing”

At the femoral graft/bone interface, the average \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw at the 3-month time point were 1.69 ± 0.29 ms and 91% ± 6%, respectively. The corresponding values were 1.60 ± 0.25 ms and 89% ± 3%, respectively at the tibial graft/bone interface. The values at the 6-month time point were 1.83 ± 0.38 ms and 94% ± 6%, respectively at the femoral graft/bone interface, and 1.64 ± 0.21 ms and 91% ± 2%, respectively at the tibial graft/bone interface. Slight, but not significant, increases in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) from the 3- to 6-month time point were observed (femoral graft/bone interface: 0.14 ± 0.40 ms, P = 0.37; tibial graft/bone interface: 0.04 ± 0.16 ms, P = 0.48). Additionally, non-significant increases in fbw were observed (femoral graft/bone interface: 3% ± 8%, P = 0.34; tibial graft/bone interface: 2% ± 4%, P = 0.10).

When comparing the intra-bone graft to the graft/bone interface in the femoral tunnel, fbw was non-significantly higher (2% ± 4%, P = 0.33) and \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) was significantly lower (− 0.09 ± 0.11 ms, P < 0.05) at the 3-month time point. The same comparisons at the 6-month time point also yielded significantly lower \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) (− 0.09 ± 0.12 ms, P < 0.05) and no difference in fbw (1% ± 3%, P = 0.30). In the tibial tunnel, no significant differences were observed at the 3-month time point (fbw: 2% ± 3%, P = 0.20; \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \): 0.17 ± 0.31 ms, P = 0.16) or the 6-month time point (fbw: 0% ± 4%, P = 0.77; \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \): 0.03 ± 0.17 ms, P = 0.63).


ACL graft healing involves dramatic changes to tissue macrostructure and organization, which can affect the transverse relaxation time (T2/T2*) of collagen bound tissue water. To alleviate the time burden of conventional bi-exponential UTE, we proposed a simplified, abbreviated 3D UTE paradigm with bias correction to monitor the T2* dynamics of fast decay component after ACL reconstruction surgery. The feasibility and accuracy of the proposed paradigm was quantitatively assessed by numerical simulations and in vivo data of healthy knees. With less than 8 mins of total MRI acquisition time, a decrease of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) was observed in the intra-articular graft, consistent with the underlying changes of collagen remodeling and reorganization during the ligamentization process. This study demonstrated the clinical translatability of the proposed abbreviated UTE protocol, suggesting the possibility of future applications in other connective tissues.

The major challenge in conducting UTE bi-exponential T2* analysis is the long acquisition time. Kijowski et al. utilized a center-out twisted 3D-Cones k-space sampling scheme for assessing fast T2* component in patellar tendinopathy with total scan time of 19 min [16]. A total of 16 echoes ranging from 0.03 to 30.0 ms were acquired. A 3D fat saturated UTE-Cones acquisition scheme with total scan time of 18 min was evaluated for single- and bi-exponential analysis of T2* relaxation in knee tendons and ligaments [23]. However, these approaches are still time consuming. Recently the feasibility of using Cartesian sampling with sub-millisecond TE was assessed in menisci. Juras et al. demonstrated that 3D Cartesian variable echo time (vTE) gradient echo may allow for high-resolution quantitative bi-exponential T2* analysis in degenerative menisci with total scan time of 12 mins [22]. However, the smallest TE of 0.75 ms limits its accuracy in quantifying fast-decay components in certain connective tissues.

In this study, the proposed abbreviated 3D UTE paradigm utilized several techniques to reduce the total acquisition time and improve the accuracy of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw quantification. By adopting a slab-selective half-sinc RF pulse for excitation, the FOV along the slice-selection direction was reduced, thus reducing the number of views acquired along the kz direction. While no noticeable imaging artifacts were observed in the reconstructed images at the second echo (TE2), some minor streaking artifacts at the first echo (TE1) can be seen. This was caused by a lower sampling density at TE1 (half Fourier) compared to TE2 (full Fourier). This effect was minimized in our analysis by performing ROI instead of voxel-wise T2* quantification. To further reduce the acquisition time, fat suppression was not utilized. This can potentially lead to increased UTE imaging artifacts due to the chemical shift of lipids. With a readout bandwidth of 560 Hz/pixel, the shift is less than one pixel and no noticeable chemical shift artifacts in UTE images were observed. To reduce potential confounds from high intensity lipid signal and for better delineation of the ACL graft, spectral selective lipid suppression techniques can be utilized in future studies [32]. By acquiring only 3 sets of 3D double-echo UTE images with maximum TE of 6.0 ms (to reduce TR and acquisition time), we do not have sufficient TE coverage to conduct complete bi-exponential fitting. As demonstrated by numerical simulations, the accuracy of the \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw quantification using the abbreviated UTE paradigm is better for lower \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and higher fbw, which is the case for ACL grafts. Large estimation bias in low fbw range was thought to be due to the violation of the underlying assumption for the baseline-corrected mono-exponential model that the \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) compartment contributes minimally to the total UTE signal at TE1s. As demonstrated in this study, the abbreviated UTE acquisition with the chosen 6 TEs allows for accurate estimation of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw within a clinically feasible acquisition time of less than 8 min after adopting a similar bias correction approach that was implemented in our recent publication [33]. The abbreviated acquisition does come at the cost of reduced spatial resolution and reduced SNR. The SNR of a single voxel of the shortest TE image for intra-articular ACL graft was ~ 75; while the estimation bias will increase with lower SNR, by averaging ~ 20,000 voxels for ACL graft regions and ~ 5000 voxels for graft/bone interface regions this problem was avoided. As demonstrated in this study in healthy knees, to further improve the accuracy of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw estimation especially for tissues with long \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and/or low fbw, bias correction with accurate slow decay component (\( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \)) characterization should be implemented. This can be directly estimated by acquiring additional conventional multi-echo gradient echo data (~ 3 mins) for improved time efficiency.

After ACL reconstruction, two major graft healing processes occur: “ligamentization” of the intra-articular graft [5, 34] and “tendon-to-bone healing” at the graft/bone interface [6]. Early ligamentization includes the graft healing and proliferation phase, with disintegration of collagen fibrils and increased synthesis of type III collagen occurring during 4–12 weeks post-operation [11, 34]. The ligamentization phase occurs from 3 to 12 months post-operation when the graft reorganizes into densely packed collagen bundles, resembling the appearance of a native, intact ACL [34]. Tendon-to-bone healing at the graft/bone interface is facilitated by fibrovascular tissue and forms perpendicular collagen bundles inserting directly into the bone, similar to Sharpey’s fibers [35, 36] which can be identified around 12–15 weeks post-surgery [6, 37]. The fibers are present until ~ 1 year after surgery, while gradual osseointegration occurs from the bone surface [38]. Due to the difficulty of in vivo access to the interior of the bone tunnel by biopsy or arthroscopy, the intra-bone graft healing process has not been well studied. In this context, the development and validation of robust and objective biomarkers to evaluate the individual ligamentization and tendon-to-bone healing status is necessary for monitoring successful outcomes of ACL reconstruction.

In both Achilles and patellar tendons, increased T2* values for the fast decay component were reported following injury [16, 21, 39]. Our results showed a decrease in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) for the intra-articular graft at ~ 6-months compared to ~ 3-months post-operation, which might be consistent with the ligamentization phase. However, the \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) values are still elevated compared to that of healthy ACL (less than 1 ms) [20], even at 6-months post-surgery. This could be due to differences in the structure of the regained collagen fibers compared to native ACL or incomplete ligamentization [40,41,42,43], since these regained collagen fibers show homogeneous small diameters while original ligaments have a bimodal distribution of small and large collagen fibers [44]. Additionally, a study has suggested that the graft of human subjects undergoes ligamentization at a slower rate than what is reported in animal studies [34]. Hence, more patients and more time points are needed to investigate whether the reconstructed ACL graft will eventually regain the \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) of a native ACL, and to better understand the time-course of the human graft ligamentization.

We hypothesize that the establishment of fibro-osseous connections at the graft/bone interface may restrict the collagen bound water and our results showed an increase of f. A previous study suggested that grafts inside of the bone tunnel also undergo a remodeling process [26]. Although not validated with graft histology, we observed an increase of \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw from 3- to 6-months after surgery. This change differed from our observations in the intra-articular graft and may suggest that the intra-bone graft undergoes a different remodeling process. Currently, there is no supporting histological studies exploring the intra-bone graft healing. We speculate that the observed higher \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) and fbw values at intra-bone graft may be caused by the accumulation of the inflammatory cells produced by bone marrow surrounding intra-bone graft, which might be more prominent in intra-bone graft than intra-articular graft. Hence, our results may provide new insight into intra-bone graft healing but further studies with more subjects and more time points are required to better elucidate this healing process.

Tendons and ligaments are known to experience orientation dependent changes to their T2* value [27,28,29,30]. As such, it is important that whenever T2* is measured in these tissues to consider the orientation of the tissue with respect to B0. In this study, because subjects were all imaged with a standard knee coil, setup and positioning of the knee was relatively consistent. No differences in orientation of the femoral and tibial intra-bone grafts between the two time points were observed, suggesting that any measured changes in these regions were not affected by the magic angle effect. Conversely, the intra-articular graft was closer to the magic angle at the 6-month time point (~ 35°) than at the 3-month time point (~ 32°), causing the measured \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) values at the second timepoint to be biased towards higher values. Meanwhile, we observed a decrease in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) in this region. This suggests that if the orientation of the intra-articular grafts were the same between the two time points, a greater decrease in \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) would have been observed. Additionally, the femoral intra-bone grafts were closer to the magic angle than the tibial intra-bone grafts, consistent with the higher observed \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) values in the femoral intra-bone grafts.

One of the limitations of our study is the lack of histological confirmation of graft healing. However, obtaining histological specimen or performing arthroscopy at multiple timepoints in noncomplicated patients is impractical, and the surgeons performed systematic clinical assessments during the entire recovery period. We are also limited by the small number of patients in this preliminary study, which provides low statistical power for he observed changes. Some of the longitudinal changes as observed in this study were on the scale of measurement uncertainties and may not reflect potential physiological changes. In addition, the time points of our longitudinal analysis might be insufficient to capture dramatic changes from ligamentization in humans. An earlier first timepoint around 1 month after surgery may detect the inflammatory phase and show a more dramatic change to the fast decay \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) component. Furthermore, some human studies suggested that the end-point of ligamentization might be more than 1 year after surgery [40, 43] and the last time point may need to be extended. Another limitation of this study is the lack of \( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) quantification of the ACL graft, which may behave differently than native ACL or tendon. Although results from our numerical simulations and in vivo healthy volunteers demonstrated that the introduced estimation bias would be very small for high bound water fraction, this may not be the case during the final stage of ligamentization (> 1 year). In addition, the selection of TEs in this study was experimentally determined to achieve good quality of UTE images and reliable quantification of the short T2* component for native ACL. Further optimization on the number of acquisitions and TE values are needed to increase the robustness of the proposed method for ACL grafts.


This preliminary study has demonstrated the feasibility of applying the proposed abbreviated UTE MRI paradigm to quantitatively evaluate the fast decay \( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) component within a clinically feasible acquisition time for ACL graft reconstruction patients (~ 8 min). We observed longitudinal changes to the short T2* component of the ACL grafts, potentially due to graft healing processes such as ligamentization and tendon-to-bone healing. This method has the potential for wide-spread adoption of quantitative UTE for routine clinical evaluation of the short T2* component of various connective tissues.

Availability of data and materials

Data and analysis code are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


\( {T}_{2l}^{\ast } \) :

T2* for the slow decay component of ACL graft

\( {T}_{2s}^{\ast } \) :

T2* for the fast decay component of ACL graft

f bw :

Bound water signal fraction


Anterior cruciate ligament


Diffusion tensor imaging


Magnetic resonance imaging




Ultrashort echo time


Variable TE


  1. 1.

    Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(6):622–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Buller LT, Best MJ, Baraga MG, Kaplan LD. Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(1):2325967114563664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mather RC 3rd, Koenig L, Kocher MS, Dall TM, Gallo P, Scott DJ, Bach BR Jr, Spindler KP, Group MK. Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(19):1751–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Amiel D, Frank C, Harwood F, Fronek J, Akeson W. Tendons and ligaments: a morphological and biochemical comparison. J Orthop Res. 1984;1(3):257–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Roux RD, Harwood FL, Akeson WH. The phenomenon of “ligamentization”: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res. 1986;4(2):162–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rodeo SA, Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, Hidaka C, Warren RF. Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(12):1795–803.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Irvine JN, Arner JW, Thorhauer E, Abebe ES, D'Auria J, Schreiber VM, Harner CD, Tashman S. Is there a difference in graft motion for bone-tendon-bone and hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction at 6 weeks and 1 year? Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kruse LM, Gray B, Wright RW. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(19):1737–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cavanaugh JT, Powers M. ACL rehabilitation progression: where are we now? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(3):289–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ellman MB, Sherman SL, Forsythe B, LaPrade RF, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surge. 2015;23(5):283–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Janssen RP, Scheffler SU. Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(9):2102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Meyers AB, Haims AH, Menn K, Moukaddam H. Imaging of anterior cruciate ligament repair and its complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):476–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Vogrin M, Rupreht M, Dinevski D, Haspl M, Kuhta M, Jevsek M, Knezevic M, Rozman P. Effects of a platelet gel on early graft revascularization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. Eur Surg Res. 2010;45(2):77–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ntoulia A, Papadopoulou F, Zampeli F, Ristanis S, Argyropoulou M, Georgoulis A. Evaluation with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament graft during its healing process: a two-year prospective study. Skelet Radiol. 2013;42(4):541–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Van Dyck P, Froeling M, De Smet E, Pullens P, Torfs M, Verdonk P, Sijbers J, Parizel PM, Jeurissen B. Diffusion tensor imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament graft. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(5):1423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kijowski R, Wilson JJ, Liu F. Bicomponent ultrashort echo time T2* analysis for assessment of patients with patellar tendinopathy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(5):1441–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wengler K, Tank D, Fukuda T, Paci JM, Huang M, Schweitzer ME, He X. Diffusion tensor imaging of human Achilles tendon by stimulated echo readout-segmented EPI (ste-RS-EPI). Magn Reson Med. 2018;80(6):2464–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Du J, Diaz E, Carl M, Bae W, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Ultrashort echo time imaging with bicomponent analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(3):645–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chang EY, Du J, Iwasaki K, Biswas R, Statum S, He Q, Bae WC, Chung CB. Single- and bi-component T2* analysis of tendon before and during tensile loading, using UTE sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(1):114–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB. UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(4):870–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Juras V, Apprich S, Szomolanyi P, Bieri O, Deligianni X, Trattnig S. Bi-exponential T2* analysis of healthy and diseased Achilles tendons: an in vivo preliminary magnetic resonance study and correlation with clinical score. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(10):2814–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Juras V, Apprich S, Zbyn S, Zak L, Deligianni X, Szomolanyi P, Bieri O, Trattnig S. Quantitative MRI analysis of menisci using biexponential T2* fitting with a variable echo time sequence. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(3):1015–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liu J, Nazaran A, Ma Y, Chen H, Zhu Y, Du J, Li S, Zhou Q, Zhao Y. Single- and Bicomponent analyses of T2 relaxation in knee tendon and ligament by using 3D ultrashort Echo time cones (UTE cones) magnetic resonance imaging. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Block K, Uecker M. Simple method for adaptive gradient-delay compensation in radial MRI. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, vol. 2011; 2011. p. 2816.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang X, Ingo C, Teeuwisse WM, Chen Z, van Osch MJP. Comparison of perfusion signal acquired by arterial spin labeling–prepared intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI and conventional IVIM MRI to unravel the origin of the IVIM signal. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79(2):723–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ge Y, Li H, Tao H, Hua Y, Chen J, Chen S. Comparison of tendon-bone healing between autografts and allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(4):954–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Du J, Pak BC, Znamirowski R, Statum S, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Magic angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of the Achilles tendon and enthesis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;27(4):557–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fullerton GD, Rahal A. Collagen structure: the molecular source of the tendon magic angle effect. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(2):345–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Oatridge A, Herlihy AH, Thomas RW, Wallace AL, Curati WL, Hajnal JV, Bydder GM. Magnetic resonance: magic angle imaging of the Achilles tendon. Lancet. 2001;358(9293):1610–1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Peh W, Chan J. The magic angle phenomenon in tendons: effect of varying the MR echo time. Br J Radiol. 1998;71(841):31–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945;26(3):297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA, Aro MR, Dean CW, Gold GE, Carrino JA. Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics. 2014;34(1):217–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wengler K, Wang J, Serrano Sosa M, Gumus S, He A, Hussain S, Huang C, Tae Bae K, He X. Mapping hepatic blood oxygenation by quantitative BOLD (qBOLD) MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81(5):3272–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Claes S, Verdonk P, Forsyth R, Bellemans J. The “ligamentization” process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2476–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Robert H, Es-Sayeh J. The role of periosteal flap in the prevention of femoral widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12(1):30–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Deehan DJ, Cawston TE. The biology of integration of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(7):889–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pinczewski LA, Clingeleffer AJ, Otto DD, Bonar SF, Corry IS. Integration of hamstring tendon graft with bone in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(5):641–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Muller B, Bowman KF Jr, Bedi A. ACL graft healing and biologics. Clin Sports Med. 2013;32(1):93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Diaz E, Chung CB, Bae WC, Statum S, Znamirowski R, Bydder GM, Du J. Ultrashort echo time spectroscopic imaging (UTESI): an efficient method for quantifying bound and free water. NMR Biomed. 2012;25(1):161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rougraff B, Shelbourne KD, Gerth PK, Warner J. Arthroscopic and histologic analysis of human patellar tendon autografts used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(2):277–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Abe S, Kurosaka M, Iguchi T, Yoshiya S, Hirohata K. Light and electron microscopic study of remodeling and maturation process in autogenous graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(4):394–405.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Falconiero RP, DiStefano VJ, Cook TM. Revascularization and ligamentization of autogenous anterior cruciate ligament grafts in humans. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(2):197–205.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sanchez M, Anitua E, Azofra J, Prado R, Muruzabal F, Andia I. Ligamentization of tendon grafts treated with an endogenous preparation rich in growth factors: gross morphology and histology. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(4):470–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Scheffler SU, Unterhauser FN, Weiler A. Graft remodeling and ligamentization after cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(9):834–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Stony Brook University Department of Radiology for providing pilot MRI scanner time for this study. Thanks to Dr. Alyssa Simeone from New York Medical College at Valhalla for her contribution to this research. Thanks to Ms. Andrea He from UC Berkeley for careful review and editing of the manuscript. Special thanks are given to Dr. Kevin Baker and Dr. Chien-Hung Lin from the Department of Radiology for interest and discussion.


Not applicable.

Author information




TF made contributions to the conception and interpretation of data and drafted the work. KW performed data analysis and made contribution to interpretation of data and drafted the work. DT, MH, EG made substantial contributions to the conception, study design and interpretation of the data. SK, JP, DK, MP performed study design, patient recruitment and data acquisition. MS made contributions to the conception, design of the work and revision of the draft. As corresponding author, XH made substantial contributions to the conception, design of the work, interpretation of the data, and revision of the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Stony Brook University Institutional Review Board (IRB #572684). All subjects gave written informed consent before participation in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

Dr. James M. Paci is an educational consultant for and receives research support from Arthrex and Zimmer-Biomet.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuda, T., Wengler, K., Tank, D. et al. Abbreviated quantitative UTE imaging in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20, 426 (2019).

Download citation


  • Ultrashort TE (UTE)
  • Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
  • ACL reconstruction
  • Graft healing
  • Ligamentization
  • Tendon-to-bone healing