Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Time trends and risk factors for perioperative complications in total ankle arthroplasty: retrospective analysis using a national database in Japan

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:450

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1299-x

  • Received: 15 May 2016
  • Accepted: 15 October 2016
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has become increasingly popular worldwide as an alternative to ankle arthrodesis for surgical treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. The aim of this epidemiological study, using a national inpatient database in Japan, was to describe the volume, utilization, patient characteristics, and temporal trends regarding these procedures in Japan, and to identify the risk factors associated with perioperative adverse events in TAA.

Methods

This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study. We retrospectively identified 2775 patients in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database who underwent ankle arthrodesis or TAA for ankle arthritis at 559 hospitals in Japan from 2007 to 2013. Information on sex, age, main diagnosis, use of blood transfusion, duration of anesthesia, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, hospitalization costs, additional procedures after primary surgery, and use of negative pressure wound therapy was extracted. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the effect of various factors on the incidence of perioperative adverse events in TAA, including additional procedure during hospitalization, negative pressure wound therapy, blood transfusion, and in-hospital death.

Results

We identified 465 patients who underwent TAA and 2310 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis. There was no apparent increase in the proportion of TAAs performed during the survey period. Patients undergoing TAA tended to be older, female, and have rheumatoid arthritis compared with those undergoing ankle arthrodesis. Patients undergoing TAA had shorter length of stay, higher hospitalization costs, and more blood transfusions compared with those undergoing ankle arthrodesis. Lower hospital volume and shorter anesthesia time were associated with higher rates of adverse events after TAA.

Conclusions

Despite an increase in the popularity of TAA internationally, the number of TAAs performed remains low in Japan. Lower hospital volume and anesthesia time were associated with higher rates of perioperative adverse events after TAA.

Level of evidence

IV, Cross-sectional study

Keywords

  • Ankle arthrodesis
  • Ankle arthroplasty
  • Ankle fusion
  • Low-volume hospitals
  • Outcomes
  • Trends

Background

Forty years have passed since the introduction of the first-generation total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), which ended in failure because of high rates of aseptic loosening and pain. Refinement of implant design by adoption of mobile bearings and technological advances has gradually improved the clinical outcomes after TAA. A recent systematic review of recent TAA studies, reported an overall survivorship of 89 % at 10 years [1]. Based on improved clinical outcomes, TAA has become increasingly popular as an alternative to arthrodesis, which has long been the gold standard for treating end-stage ankle arthritis. A previous report using the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample data contained data from five to eight million hospital stays and discharges from > 1,000 hospitals sampled to approximate a 20 % stratified sample of United States community hospitals. This sample showed an approximately 6-fold increase in TAA utilization in the previous decade, from 0.13 per 100,000 population in 1998 to 0.84 per 100,000 population in 2010 [2]. Another study from the United States using the Medicare database included 5871 patients who underwent TAA and 29532 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis between 1991 and 2010; this study reported an increase in TAA volume from 72 procedures in 1991 to 888 in 2010 [3]. The study also revealed that the percentage of all United States hospitals performing TAA increased by approximately 4-fold from 3.1 % in 1991 to 12.6 % in 2010, while the proportion performing ankle arthrodesis remained unchanged. Although the sample sizes were smaller than those in the United States studies, joint registry data from northern European nations also showed a more than 2-fold increase in TAA in a recent decade [4, 5]. Joint registry data from New Zealand demonstrated an approximately 4-fold increase in TAA from 26 arthroplasties in 2003 to 113 arthroplasties in 2013 [6].

Because there is a steep learning curve for the TAA procedure [711], improved outcomes and decreased complications would be expected by virtue of the global growth in the number of procedures performed [12]. Although there has been an increase in the number of TAA procedures performed around the world, TAA is still considered a fairly rare procedure in Japan. There have been no published studies revealing epidemiological data on TAA utilization within Japan.

Although TAA has been recently popularized worldwide, it is still accompanied by higher rates of complications compared with total hip and knee arthroplasties [1, 1315]. Surgeon understanding of the complications and their risk factors is important to provide good clinical outcomes; however, there is limited evidence available in the literature about risk factors for perioperative complications after TAA.

The purpose of this study was (i) to assess recent trends in the use of TAA compared with ankle arthrodesis in Japan, and (ii) to identify the risk factors associated with perioperative complications in TAA using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database, a large national inpatient database in Japan.

Methods

Data source

The DPC database is a national administrative claims and discharge database on acute-care inpatients in Japan. All 82 academic hospitals in Japan are obliged to adopt this system, while community hospitals participate on a voluntary basis. The numbers of participating hospitals were 898, 855, 901, 980, 1,075, 1,057, and 1,061, in fiscal years 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. Data were collected during 6 months (from July 1 to December 31) between fiscal years 2007 and 2009, 9 months (from July 1 to March 31) in fiscal year 2010, and throughout the year (from April 1 to March 31) from fiscal year 2011 on. The numbers of admissions in the database were 2.65, 2.81, 2.78, 4.95, 7.14, 6.85, and 7.11 million in fiscal years 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. The number in 2013 represented approximately 50 % of all inpatient admissions to acute-care hospitals in Japan.

The DPC database includes the following: age and sex; diagnoses, comorbidities at admission, and complications after admission recorded with text data in the Japanese language and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes; procedures coded using the Japanese original codes; duration of anesthesia; drugs and implants used; blood transfusion; length of hospital stay; in-hospital mortality; and hospitalization costs.

Data extraction

Data were retrospectively collected on patients who received either primary TAA or ankle arthrodesis between 2007 and 2013. Patients who had a fracture from a traffic accident, pyogenic arthritis, Charcot disease, diabetic arthritis, or pigmented villonodular synovitis were excluded to focus on patients with ankle arthritis due to inflammatory pathology and osteoarthritis. Eligible patients were divided into osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) groups. The outcomes included length of hospital stay (days), hospitalization costs, operative costs, use of blood transfusion, in-hospital mortality, additional procedures during hospitalization after primary surgery, and use of negative pressure wound therapy. Details of additional procedures were further divided into the following categories: wound treatment, skin graft of flap, and limb amputation. Perioperative adverse events were defined as the composite outcome, including additional procedure during hospitalization, negative pressure wound therapy, blood transfusion, and in-hospital death.

Based on the protocol by Quan et al. [16], each ICD-10 code of a comorbidity was converted to a score, and the sum of the scores, excluding the score for RA (=1), was used to calculate the patient’s Charlson Comorbidity Index [17]. Hospital volume was defined as the mean number of TAAs performed per year at each institution. Patients were dichotomized into low-volume (≤ 4 cases/year) and high-volume (≥ 5 cases/year) groups according to the only previous study reporting the influence of hospital volume on complications after TAA [18]. For analysis of hospitalization costs, 1 US dollar was assumed to be 100 Japanese yen.

Statistical analysis

We performed univariate comparisons of explanatory variables using the chi-square test or analysis of variance, as appropriate. Multivariable linear regression or multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the comparison of outcomes between TAA and ankle arthrodesis to adjust for the differences in demographics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the independent factors associated with perioperative adverse events after TAA, with adjustment for other variables. All demographic variables with a P-value less than 0.1 in the univariate analyses were entered into the multivariable logistic regression model. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and Bonferroni adjustments were used to reduce the potential for false positives due to multiple comparisons. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

We identified 465 patients who underwent TAA and 2,310 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis at 559 hospitals during the survey period. The absolute numbers and proportions of these two procedures in each year are shown in Table 1. The proportion of TAAs fluctuated between 12 and 20 %.
Table 1

Numbers of patients and hospitals undergoing ankle arthrodesis or total ankle arthroplasty

Year

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Total

Ankle arthrodesis

152 (80.4 %)

223 (87.5 %)

183 (85.1 %)

293 (88.3 %)

440 (82.4 %)

524 (82.1 %)

495 (80.9 %)

2310 (83.2 %)

Total ankle arthroplasty

37 (19.6 %)

32 (12.5 %)

32 (14.9 %)

39 (11.7 %)

94 (17.6 %)

114 (17.9 %)

117 (19.1 %)

465 (16.8 %)

Total

189

255

215

332

534

638

612

2775

Data collection periods (months)

6

6

6

9

12

12

12

Number of enrolled hospitals in DPC

898

855

901

980

1075

1057

1061

Number of admissions in DPC (million)

2.65

2.81

2.78

4.95

7.14

6.85

7.11

34.29

Table 2 shows the patient backgrounds. The mean age and the proportion of female patients were significantly higher in the group who underwent TAA (69.1 years; 83.7 %) compared with those who underwent ankle arthrodesis (64.5 years; 70.7 %). The average age was significantly higher in the TAA group than the ankle arthrodesis group among OA patients, but was not significantly different among RA patients. Patients with TAA were more likely to have RA (38.5 vs 24.0 %). There was no significant difference in anesthesia time between the two groups.
Table 2

Comparison of patient characteristics and anesthesia time between ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty groups

 

Total (n = 2775)

Ankle arthrodesis (n = 2310)

Total ankle arthroplasty (n = 465)

P-value

Age (years), mean ± SD

65.7 ± 11.2

64.5 ± 11.4

69.1 ± 9.2

< 0.001

 in osteoarthritis patients

66.3 ± 11.6

65.4 ± 11.8

72.1 ± 8.3

< 0.001

 in rheumatoid arthritis patients

63.9 ± 9.9

63.8 ± 10.2

64.4 ± 8.6

0.452

Sex (female)

2022 (72.9 %)

1633 (70.7 %)

389 (83.7 %)

< 0.001

Body mass index (kg/m2), mean ± SD

24.4 ± 3.9

24.5 ± 4.0

24.2 ± 3.7

0.328

Smoking

 Nonsmoker

1931 (69.6 %)

1590 (68.8 %)

341 (73.3 %)

0.043

 Ex or current smoker

323 (11.6 %)

284 (12.3 %)

39 (8.4 %)

 

 Missing

521 (18.8 %)

436 (18.9 %)

85 (18.3 %)

 

Underlying diagnosis

 Osteoarthritis

2042 (73.6 %)

1756 (76.0 %)

286 (61.5 %)

< 0.001

 Rheumatoid arthritis

733 (26.4 %)

554 (24.0 %)

179 (38.5 %)

 

Charlson Comorbidity Index

 0

2472 (89.0 %)

2049 (88.7 %)

423 (91.0 %)

0.153

  ≥ 1

303 (11.0 %)

261 (11.3 %)

42 (9.0 %)

 

Anesthesia time (minutes), mean ± SD

199 ± 91

199 ± 93

200 ± 84

0.127

The values in bold indicate significant differences at the 0.007 (=0.05/7) significance level

The TAA group had a significantly shorter average hospital stay compared with the ankle arthrodesis group, and total hospitalization costs and operative costs were significantly higher in the TAA group compared with the ankle arthrodesis group (Table 3); the differences in these variables were also significant after adjusting the differences in demographics (Table 3A, B). There were no significant differences in the performance of an additional procedure during hospitalization or in the use of negative pressure wound therapy between the ankle arthrodesis and TAA groups, and the differences were also not significant after adjusting for the differences in demographics (Table 3A, B). The proportion of patients receiving a blood transfusion was significantly higher in the TAA group than in the ankle arthrodesis group, although this difference was not significant after adjusting for the differences in demographics (Table 3A, B).
Table 3

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty groups (A), and adjusted coefficient of determination and odds ratio of major outcomes in total ankle arthroplasty group using ankle arthrodesis group as a control (B)

A.

 

Total (n = 2775)

Ankle arthrodesis (n = 2310)

Total ankle arthroplasty (n = 465)

P-value

Length of stay (days), mean ± SD

41.8 ± 28.2

42.8 ± 29.1

36.9 ± 23.6

< 0.001 a

Hospitalization costs (dollars), mean ± SD

16111 ± 8002

15123 ± 8085

21019 ± 7595

< 0.001 a

Costs of operation (dollars), mean ± SD

6196 ± 2635

5063 ± 2576

11827 ± 2927

< 0.001 a

Additional procedure during hospitalization

90 (3.2 %)

76 (3.3 %)

14 (3.0 %)

0.756

Wound treatment

68 (2.5 %)

54 (2.3 %)

14 (3.0 %)

0.392

Skin graft or flap

18 (0.6 %)

16 (0.7 %)

2 (0.4 %)

0.520

Limb amputation

1 (0.04 %)

1 (0.04 %)

0 (0.00 %)

0.654

Negative pressure wound therapy

8 (0.3 %)

6 (0.3 %)

2 (0.4 %)

0.525

Blood transfusion (number of patients)

85 (3.1 %)

61 (2.6 %)

24 (5.2 %)

0.004 a

In-hospital death

2 (0.07 %)

2 (0.09 %)

0 (0.00 %)

0.999

B.

 

Coefficient

95 % CI

P-value

Length of stay (days)

−6.9

−10.0 to -3.7

< 0.001 b

Hospitalization costs (dollars)

5531

4647–6417

< 0.001 b

Costs of operation (dollars)

6577

6274–6881

< 0.001 b

 

Odds ratio

95 % CI

P-value

Additional procedure during hospitalization

0.85

0.43–1.68

0.634

Blood transfusion (number of patients)

1.40

0.77–2.53

0.270

aThe values in bold indicate significant differences at the 0.005 (=0.05/10) significance level

bThe values in bold indicate significant differences at the 0.05 significance level

Table 4 shows the incidence of perioperative adverse events limited to the patients who underwent TAA. The overall rate of perioperative adverse events during hospitalization was 7.1 % (33 of 465). The rate of perioperative adverse events was higher in those with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1 or greater, those in the low-volume hospital group, and those with anesthesia time of 200 min or greater. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that perioperative adverse events after TAA were independently associated with hospital volume and anesthesia time, with significantly reduced odds in high-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 0.31; 95 % confidence interval, 0.10–0.96; Table 5) and significantly increased odds in the group with longer anesthesia time (odds ratio, 2.83; 95 % confidence interval, 1.10–7.28; Table 5).
Table 4

Incidence of perioperative adverse events after total ankle arthroplasty in each subgroup

 

Total

Perioperative adverse events

P-value

All

465

33 (7.1 %)

 

Age (year)

  

0.071

  ≤ 39

4

1 (25.0 %)

 

 40–49

6

1 (16.7 %)

 

 50–59

56

8 (14.3 %)

 

 60–69

152

12 (7.9 %)

 

 70–79

197

8 (4.1 %)

 

  ≥ 80

50

3 (6.0 %)

 

Sex

 Male

76

6 (7.9 %)

0.767

 Female

389

27 (6.9 %)

 

Body mass index

  < 30

333

22 (6.6 %)

0.857

  ≥ 30

26

3 (11.5 %)

 

 Missing

106

8 (7.5 %)

 

Smoking

 Nonsmoker

322

19 (6.0 %)

0.128

 Ex or current smoker

35

4 (11.4 %)

 

 Missing

75

10 (13.3 %)

 

Charlson Comorbidity Index

 0

423

26 (6.1 %)

0.001

  ≥ 1

42

7 (16.7 %)

 

Mean hospital volume (per year)

  ≤ 4

269

29 (10.8 %)

< 0.001

  ≥ 5

196

4 (2.0 %)

 

Underlying diagnosis

 Osteoarthritis

286

13 (4.5 %)

0.007

 Rheumatoid arthritis

179

20 (11.2 %)

 

Anesthesia time

  < 200 min

270

7 (2.6 %)

< 0.001

  ≥ 200 min

195

26 (13.3 %)

 

The values in bold indicate significant differences at the 0.006 (=0.05/8) significance level

Table 5

Multivariable logistic regression for perioperative adverse events after total ankle arthroplasty

 

Odds ratio

95 % CI

P-value

Age (years)

0.970

0.932–1.010

0.140

Charlson Comorbidity Index

 0

1.00

  

  ≥ 1

2.16

0.83–5.64

0.116

Mean hospital volume (per year)

  ≤ 4

1.00

  

  ≥ 5

0.31

0.10–0.96

0.042

Underlying diagnosis

 Osteoarthritis

1.00

  

 Rheumatoid arthritis

1.43

0.63–3.24

0.393

Anesthesia time

  < 200 min

1.00

  

  ≥ 200 min

2.83

1.10–7.28

0.031

The values in bold indicate significant differences at the 0.05 significance level

Discussion

Evidence of improved clinical outcomes has resulted in an increase in the number of TAAs performed worldwide for end-stage ankle arthritis. The present study found that TAA remains a less common procedure in Japan, and that low hospital volume was associated with an increased risk of complications after TAA.

The proportion of TAAs performed did not show any apparent increase between 2007 and 2013 in Japan, and only around 100 TAAs were performed annually after 2011. Considering the fact that the DPC database covers more than 50 % of all inpatient admissions to acute-care hospitals in Japan, it can be estimated that 0.2 TAA per 100,000 inhabitants is performed annually in Japan. This figure is fairly low compared with 1 TAA per 100,000 inhabitants in Sweden, Norway, and the United Kingdom [4, 5, 19], approximately 2 per 100,000 inhabitants in Finland and Germany [13, 20], 0.6 to 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants in Australia and New Zealand [6, 21], and 1.9 to 4.0 per 100,000 inhabitants in the United States [3, 22]. The ratio of TAA to ankle arthrodesis was also low in the present study (1:6), compared with 1:2–3 in the United States, France, and Germany [3, 18, 20, 23]. These differences likely reflect preferences of surgeons in Japan to perform ankle arthrodesis over TAA compared with surgeons in Western countries.

The present study showed that the underlying diagnosis was significantly different between TAA and ankle arthrodesis groups, indicating the preference of surgeons to perform TAA over ankle arthrodesis for patients with RA in Japan. The percentage of RA as an underlying diagnosis among patients undergoing TAA was 38.5 % in the present study, which was comparable to that in Scandinavian countries [4, 5, 13]. In contrast, studies from Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, France, and the United States demonstrated that the percentage of RA was less than or around 10 % [6, 19, 21, 24]. A previous study from the United States demonstrated a decrease in the percentage of RA from 10.8 % in 1998–2000 to 4.9 % in 2009–2010 [2]. This trend could indicate that growing evidence of good clinical outcomes after TAA has been expanding the indication for TAA from low-activity patients such as those with RA to higher-level activity patients. The higher percentage of TAA utilization in RA patients in Japan may imply that Japanese surgeons have a perception that the risks outweigh the benefits in high-activity patients and the benefits outweigh the risks in those with RA.

Both the total hospitalization costs and operative costs were significantly higher in the TAA group. This can be explained by the high implant costs associated with arthroplasty. The blood transfusion rate was significantly lower in the ankle arthrodesis group. This result is contradictory to a report that compared the perioperative complications and hospitalization outcomes after ankle arthrodesis and TAA using the data of the National Inpatient Sample in the United States, which has been the only study comparing the blood transfusion rate between the two groups [23]. We could not perform a multivariate analysis to adjust for differences in demographics and comorbidities according to blood transfusion because of the small number of events. Further accumulation of data will be needed to make a conclusion about this topic.

There are a limited number of studies comparing the perioperative complications and hospitalization outcomes between ankle arthrodesis and TAA. A previous study in the United States reported that TAA was independently associated with a decreased risk of overall complication during hospitalization [23]. Another study in the United States reported that patients treated with TAA had a significantly increased rate of major revision at 90 days postoperatively [25]. A multicenter, prospective, cohort study by the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society comparing ankle arthrodesis and TAAs performed between 2001 and 2007 reported that the major complication rate was 7 % for ankle arthrodesis and 19 % for TAA [26]. Because of the difference in observational periods, definition of complications, and backgrounds of the patients, we could not directly compare the present study with previous ones. In particular, the duration of hospitalization in Japan is the longest among the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries [27], which might be attributed to factors including differences in healthcare systems and cultural norms. The duration of hospitalization of around 40 days after TAA in Japan (including the rehabilitation period) is far longer than that, for example, in the US, which is reportedly around 3 days [3, 22]. Owing to the longer duration of hospitalization in Japan, we consider that most of the perioperative complications were included in our analysis. We believe the present study is valuable in revealing that most of the additional procedures during hospitalization were related to wound complications and there was no significant difference in the rate of additional procedures required for these between TAA and ankle arthrodesis groups.

Wound issues are one of the common complications in both TAA and ankle arthrodesis, and can be a major problem, leading to implant infection and limb amputation especially after TAA [28]. A multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, 2-phase comparison of ankle arthrodesis and Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) showed that major complications and the need for secondary surgical intervention were more common in the TAA group; however, the rate of major complications in the TAA group decreased in the second phase of the trial compared with the first phase [12], and this was attributed to increased surgeon experience and some modifications to the instruments and technique. As that study demonstrated, the rate of perioperative complications after TAAs procedure is also associated with the popularization of TAA. We believe that the present study provides important epidemiological information for future investigations.

Many factors have been considered risks for delayed wound healing in total joint arthroplasty, including previous incisions, lymphedema, poor vascular perfusion, obesity, diabetes mellitus, inflammatory arthropathy, renal or liver disease, immune compromise, corticosteroid therapy, smoking, poor nutrition, and a long operative time [2931]; some of these have also been identified as risks in TAA. Raikin et al. reported that underlying inflammatory arthritis was the only significant risk factor for major wound complications using multivariate analysis [32]; however, RA was not identified as an independent risk factor in the present study. Because background and indication for surgeries in RA patients might differ between countries, direct comparison is difficult. Obesity and smoking are well-recognized risk factors for delayed wound healing after TAA [3336], although these factors were not identified as risks in the present study. We think that this inconsistency might be attributed to the small number of subjects in the present study. Kessler et al. reported that patients with wound healing problems were at risk for infection of TAA, and patients with periprosthetic ankle joint infection had longer operative times than matched controls [28]. The present study demonstrated that longer anesthesia time was independently associated with perioperative complications. We could not obtain the operative time from the DPC database, and so we substituted anesthesia time as a reflection of the operative time.

Some studies suggested that low-volume centers were associated with implant failures or poor survival rate [18, 37]. In France, the National Commission for the Evaluation of Medical Devices and Healthcare Technologies proposed to limit TAA to centers that performed at least 10 TAAs per year for the past 3 years [18]. The present study demonstrated that a higher hospital volume was independently associated with a lower rate of perioperative complications after TAA. A study from France, which has been the only study analyzing the effect of hospital volume on outcome after TAA, reported that infectious and cutaneous complications were more likely to occur in high-volume centers (≥ 5 cases/year) compared with the low-volume centers (≤ 4 cases/year) (16 % vs 5 %, P = 0.015) [18]. They included only 97 cases performed in 3 high-volume centers and 86 cases in 6 low-volume centers. We believe our study is advantageous because of its large sample from a national database. Given the technical demands and experience required to perform TAA successfully, the current situation in Japan that most hospitals perform < 5 TAAs annually raises concerns about provider competence. Moreover, the dispersion of a relatively low number of TAA cases over many hospitals may make the investigation of clinical outcomes difficult, and may be one of the reasons for the slow growth of TAA in Japan. Another possible reason for the slow growth of TAA is the limited availability of marketed TAA designs. Only 2 implants are available in Japan: the TNK ankle (Kyocera Medical, Osaka, Japan) and the FINE total ankle system (Teijin Nakashima Medical, Okayama, Japan). The numbers of different implant designs available in other countries are 10 in Australia, 7 in the UK, 6 in the United States, New Zealand, and Sweden, and 5 in Finland and Norway [38]. In addition, we have demonstrated that the lower the number of TAA cases per hospital, the more susceptible the TAA procedure is to complications. This may make it more difficult for surgeons to opt for TAA. To make it possible for the public to access this therapeutic option, further efforts will be required by Japanese foot and ankle surgeons to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of Japan-originated TAA implants. A joint registry system or centralization of TAA cases at a restricted number of facilities should be considered as one means for solving the problem. Moreover, creating opportunities to obtain additional specialized training for surgeons aiming to perform TAA would be desirable to compensate for this lack of experience.

Several limitations of our study must be acknowledged. First, the use of an administrative claims database could have led to underestimation or overestimation of backgrounds or perioperative complications because of incomplete reporting or misclassification. Although we were unable to verify the data for each patient, we presume that there was no difference in the proportion of miscoding between the TAA and ankle arthrodesis groups, and that the level of miscoding is low if any, as the DPC data are coded by physicians and subject to an audit. Second, the DPC database is less likely to reflect the situation in small hospitals because hospitals participating in the database are relatively large. Third, the DPC data was not obtained for the entire year between 2007 and 2010. However, we believe that there may not be any selection bias, as there is presumably no seasonal variation in the surgical procedures evaluated in this study. Fourth, although surgeon volume might also affect the perioperative complications, this information was not able to be obtained and included in the analyses. However, most of the perioperative complications were assumed to be included in our analysis as the mean hospital stay was around 40 days in both groups. Despite these limitations, we believe that the present study is epidemiologically important because it demonstrates trends in the use of ankle arthrodesis/TAA and compared backgrounds and perioperative complications comprehensively between these two procedures for the first time in the Japanese population.

Conclusions

In summary, the proportion of TAA procedures did not markedly increase from 2007 to 2013 in Japan, in contrast to an increase reported in other developed countries. Lower hospital volume and anesthesia time were associated with higher rates of perioperative adverse events after TAA.

Abbreviations

DPC: 

Diagnosis procedure combination

ICD-10: 

International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision

OA: 

Osteoarthritis

RA: 

Rheumatoid arthritis

TAA: 

Total ankle arthroplasty

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants for Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan (grant numbers: H27-Policy-Designated-009 and H27-Policy-Strategy-011). The funder has played no role in the design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. The authors did not receive any other outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor any member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity.

Availability of data and materials

The data will not be shared, because the data are patient data and were collected on the agreement that the individual-level data will not be publicly distributed and only aggregated data must be publicized.

Authors’ contributions

TM, HY, NI, TY, YK and ST contributed to the conception and design of the study. TM, HY, HM, and KF contributed to the analysis, and all authors contributed to the interpretation of the results. TM drafted the article; all authors revised it critically and approved the final version submitted for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Tokyo. Because of the anonymous nature of the data, the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
(2)
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
(3)
Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0034, Japan
(4)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, 3-8-3 Mizonokuchi, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki 213-8507, Japan

References

  1. Zaidi R, Cro S, Gurusamy K, Siva N, Macgregor A, Henricson A, Goldberg A. The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11):1500–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Singh JA, Ramachandran R. Time trends in totankle arthroplasty in the USA: a study of the National Inpatient Sample. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(1):239–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pugely AJ, Lu X, Amendola A, Callaghan JJ, Martin CT, Cram P. Trends in the use of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in the United States Medicare population. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(3):207–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Available at: http://nrlweb.ihelse.net/. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  5. Henricson A, Coster M, Carlsson A. The Swedish National Ankle Registry. Fuβ&Sprunggelenk. 2014;12:65–9.Google Scholar
  6. New Zealand Joint Registry. Available at: http://www.nzoa.org.nz/. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  7. Clement RC, Krynetskiy E, Parekh SG. The total ankle arthroplasty learning curve with third-generation implants: a single surgeon's experience. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013;6(4):263–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Haskell A, Mann RA. Perioperative complication rate of total ankle replacement is reduced by surgeon experience. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(5):283–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: An analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(5):569–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee KB, Cho SG, Hur CI, Yoon TR. Perioperative complications of HINTEGRA total ankle replacement: our initial 50 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(10):978–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Myerson MS, Mroczek K. Perioperative complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(1):17–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, Amendola A, Anderson RB, Berlet GC, Brodsky JW, Chou LB, Clanton TO, Deland JT, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(7):579–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Skytta ET, Koivu H, Eskelinen A, Ikavalko M, Paavolainen P, Remes V. Total ankle replacement: a population-based study of 515 cases from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):114–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Nunley JA, Caputo AM, Easley ME, Cook C. Intermediate to long-term outcomes of the STAR Total Ankle Replacement: the patient perspective. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(1):43–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gadd RJ, Barwick TW, Paling E, Davies MB, Blundell CM. Assessment of a three-grade classification of complications in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(5):434–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pinar N, Vernet E, Bizot P, Brilhault J. Total ankle arthroplasty - total ankle arthroplasty in Western France: influence of volume on complications and clinical outcome. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(4 Suppl):S26–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. National Joint Registry (NJR) for England and Wales. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  20. Kostuj T, Preis M, Walther M, Aghayev E, Krummenauer F, Roder C. German Total Ankle Replacement Register of the German Foot and Ankle Society (D. A. F.) - presentation of design and reliability of the data as well as first results. Z Orthop Unfall. 2014;152(5):446–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Available at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  22. Raikin SM, Rasouli MR, Espandar R, Maltenfort MG. Trends in treatment of advanced ankle arthropathy by total ankle replacement or ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(3):216–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiang JJ, Schipper ON, Whyte N, Koh JL, Toolan BC. Comparison of perioperative complications and hospitalization outcomes after ankle arthrodesis versus total ankle arthroplasty from 2002 to 2011. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(4):360–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Argenson JN, Boisgard S, Parratte S, Descamps S, Bercovy M, Bonnevialle P, Briard JL, Brilhault J, Chouteau J, Nizard R, et al. Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years' follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(4):385–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2143–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Daniels TR, Younger AS, Penner M, Wing K, Dryden PJ, Wong H, Glazebrook M. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(2):135–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD iLibrary. Health at a Glance 2015. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance_19991312/. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.
  28. Kessler B, Sendi P, Graber P, Knupp M, Zwicky L, Hintermann B, Zimmerli W. Risk factors for periprosthetic ankle joint infection: a case–control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(20):1871–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Greene KA, Wilde AH, Stulberg BN. Preoperative nutritional status of total joint patients. Relationship to postoperative wound complications. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6(4):321–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jameson SS, Mason JM, Baker PN, Elson DW, Deehan DJ, Reed MR. The Impact of Body Mass Index on Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Complications Following Primary Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(10):1889–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones RE, Russell RD, Huo MH. Wound healing in total joint replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;95-B(11 Suppl A):144–7.Google Scholar
  32. Raikin SM, Kane J, Ciminiello ME. Risk factors for incision-healing complications following total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(12):2150–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Whalen JL, Spelsberg SC, Murray P. Wound breakdown after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(4):301–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Noelle S, Egidy CC, Cross MB, Gebauer M, Klauser W. Complication rates after total ankle arthroplasty in one hundred consecutive prostheses. Int Orthop. 2013;37(9):1789–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Werner BC, Burrus MT, Looney AM, Park JS, Perumal V, Cooper MT. Obesity Is Associated With Increased Complications After Operative Management of End-Stage Ankle Arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(8):863–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lampley A, Gross CE, Green CL, DeOrio JK, Easley M, Adams S, Nunley 2nd JA. Association of Cigarette Use and Complication Rates and Outcomes Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2016 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  37. Reuver JM, Dayerizadeh N, Burger B, Elmans L, Hoelen M, Tulp N. Total ankle replacement outcome in low volume centers: short-term followup. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(12):1064–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Roukis TS, Prissel MA. Registry data trends of total ankle replacement use. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(6):728–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement