Surgical revision for stump problems after traumatic above-ankle amputations of the lower extremity
© Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015
Received: 8 July 2014
Accepted: 23 February 2015
Published: 5 March 2015
Stump problems (SPs) secondary to traumatic lower limb amputation had a crucial influence on amputees’ ability to return to living and work. The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical management strategies of the SPs after above-ankle amputation of the lower limb secondary to trauma.
A cohort of clinical cases, who were troubled by SPs after above-ankle amputation following trauma, had undergone revision surgery of the stump and was analyzed retrospectively. Various factors were noted like sex, unilateral or bilateral, amputation type, and causes of trauma. Different SPs like excess soft tissue (where a considerable amount of soft tissue interposed between the rigid elements which hindered the fitting of a prosthesis), scar, ulcers, neuromas, and bone spurs were taken as dependent variables. The relationship between factors and SPs was analyzed.
A total of 80 stumps were treated surgically. The frequency of excess soft tissue in above-knee amputation cases was higher than that in below-knee amputation (p = 0.007). Bone spur occurred more frequently in the unilateral amputation than in bilateral ones (p = 0.018). There was a significant difference in the ADL scores between admission and discharge (p = 0.000).
Stump problems secondary to traumatic lower limb amputation had crucial influence on amputees’ ability to return to living and work, appropriate evaluation and timely surgical revision showed excellent results.
KeywordsLower extremity Amputation Traumatic Stump problems Surgical revision
Stump problems (SPs) are very common complications in patients, who have suffered from traumatic amputation, and often impede prosthetic fitting and weight-bearing . SPs include stump skin scar or ulcer, delayed wound healing, excess soft tissues, prominent bone under skin, and stump pain caused by spurs or neuroma. The aims of this retrospective study were to examine factors that influence the occurrence of SPs and to discuss the management strategies of surgical revisions.
Study design and population
A retrospective cohort design was used. The study population consisted of 248 amputees (including upper and lower limbs) who were admitted to a rehabilitation program from November 1992 to August 2008. Among these patients, 72 received appropriate surgical operations on 80 residual limbs due to SPs after an above-ankle amputation secondary to trauma. Ethics approval was obtained before initiation of the study from the Ethic Committee of Beijing Bo Ai Hospital. Consent from patients was obtained for their images to be published.
The following variables were extracted from the medical records: age, gender, mean duration of hospitalization (days), amputation types, months from primary amputation to stump revision, causes of trauma for amputation, soft tissue coverage (excess soft tissue, obvious scar, ulcer, neuroma), bone protrusion and spur, and unilateral or bilateral amputation. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score was also measured using the Barthel index (BI)  by trained physicians at admission and discharge. The ADL scores ranged between 0 and 100.
If there was ostemyelitis or a deep infection in the residual limb, complete debridement and continuous irrigation drainage suction was performed until the infection was resolved. In order to facilitate absorption of the stump swelling and to prevent flexion contracture, elastic bandages or plaster were routinely used . If SPs could not be solved by any of the surgical procedures mentioned above, a revision amputation would then be performed proximally (Figure 3).
The relationship between gender and stump problems
Excess soft tissue
1.10 ± 0.56
1.06 ± 0.68
The relationship between amputation side and stump problems
Excess soft tissue
1.11 ± 0.58
1.09 ± 0.49
The relationship between amputation type and stump problems
Excess soft tissue
0.94 ± 0.46
1.12 ± 0.59
The relationship between trauma causes and stump problems
Excess soft tissue
1.17 ± 0.65
1.04 ± 0.38
0.99 ± 0.41
Evaluation criteria of stump problems
Skin: scar, folds, folliculitis, ulcer, fistulas etc.
Muscle: loose, without myodesis and myoplasty
Nerve: neuroma, adhesion of nerve
Bone end:spur, abduction or mecism of fibula
Stump pain (4 types ): nerve stimulation, circulatory disturbance, muscle anomalous tension, bone spur
phantom limb pain:complicated reasons, not fully clear
Shape of stump
Soft tissue coverage
Extensive skin grafting,including stamp skin grafting
Bone protrusion subcutaneously with muscle retraction
Excess soft tissue
Emergent operation for amputation
Failure of limb salvage
Normal healing after amputation
Necrosis, infection, delayed healing
Yes, companied with ulcer, fistulas, osteomyelitis etc.
Among the 80 stump revisions in this study, 55 patients (66.3%) did not undergo myodesis in the primary amputation; 42 (52.5%) patients had heavy scar; 38 (47.5%) patients had a neuroma; 24 (30%) patients had excess soft tissues; and 14 (17.5%) patients had ulcers. For surgical revision strategies, 14 patients underwent tibiofibular synostosis (8 Ertl’s technique, 6 bone grafting and screw fixation), and 12 patients had a revision more than twice because of neuroma, bone spur, or heavy scar. Thirteen patients (21 limbs) were bilateral amputees. The standard leg amputation procedures were performed for five cases. No cases required advancement of their amputation level from below knee to above knee. The average length of hospital time for patients with or without medical insurance was 220.2 and 103.6 days, respectively. Statistical analysis results are shown in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4.
ADL scores were collected on forty-one patients both at admission and discharge. There was a significant increase in ADL scores at discharge (95.40 ± 3.92) compared to that at admission (85.31 ± 7.24) (t = −11.536, P <0.001).
The main causes of amputation in this study were high-energy injuries with 56.25% caused by traffic accidents, 26.25% by crash, and 17.50% by machine winding injuries. The patients in this study were mostly young adults with a median age of 28.8 ± 12.4, mainly in their most active stages of life; the importance of obtaining functional amputation stumps cannot be overemphasized. Studies demonstrated that stump problems after lower limb amputations are important factors to impede proper prosthetic fit and the functional outcome of amputees [1,8-12]. The average duration of hospitalization for patients with medical insurance (220.2 days) was longer than those without insurance (103.6 days).
With regards to the functional amputation stumps, Burgess et al.  put forward the concept of functional residual limb (i.e. the stump should play a role as locomotive and sensory organ like human’s feet), while the artificial limb functions like shoes. Based on this concept, Cui et al.  further proposed that residual limbs should be classified as ideal and less-ideal stumps. Both concepts were proposed to emphasize and highlight that amputation should be regarded as a functional reconstruction procedure rather than just simple limb dissection after the failure of limb salvage treatment. According to the randomized study by Wadwhani , 43% of lower limb amputees had stump problems. Among the 248 amputees who were admitted for rehabilitation in this study, 72 (29.0%) patients who had above-ankle amputations secondary to trauma received stump revision. Stump problems are very common in lower limb amputees. The principal aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between the factors of gender, unilateral or bilateral amputation, amputation level, causes of trauma, and stump problems.
I. The evaluation of stump problems
The causes of stump problems are complex and multi-factorial, such as anatomical structures, nature of pain, stump shape, soft tissue coverage, the conditions of primary amputation, and infection (Table 5). A comprehensive consideration of all these factors will greatly aid accurate judgment, evaluation, and appropriate treatment of SPs.
The data in the present study also suggested that stump problems were usually related to iatrogenic factors: a lack of understanding of the theoretical knowledge and the surgical techniques about amputation and rehabilitation. A large proportion of cases (66.3%) in this group did not get a myodesis or myoplasty at the primary amputation. Considering the cost and suffering to keep longer but less ideal residual limbs for the patients, the importance of achieving a satisfactory weight-bearing stump, even if a little shorter but with enough and healthy soft tissue coverage, cannot be overemphasized (Figure 3c). The management of skin, muscles, nerves, blood vessels, or bone should follow modern amputation ideas and technology [3,16].
II. The influence factors on the stump problems
The relationship between six common stump problems and factors such as gender, unilateral or bilateral amputation, amputation level and causes of trauma were analyzed. We found that the stump problems demonstrated no significant relationship with gender and trauma causes. The mean time from primary amputation to stump revision for the below-knee amputation was significantly longer than that of the above-knee amputation (p = 0.03), probably because a lower leg prosthesis has better compensatory function and relatively lower risk to injure the stump than a thigh prosthesis. The frequency of excess soft tissue in a thigh stump was significantly higher than that of a lower leg stump, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.007). The presence of a considerable amount of soft tissue interposed between the rigid elements and the absence of ligamentous or muscle prevented the successful fitting of the prosthesis (Figure 1a). Fifty-six residual limbs (70%) received revision surgery for bone spurs, which were observed more frequently in unilateral amputation than in bilateral amputation with significant statistical difference (p = 0.018). The potential reason may be that the patients with unilateral amputations use their stumps more frequently.
BI scores were obtained for 41 patients at both admission and discharge, and the values at discharge (95.40 ± 3.92) were significantly higher than that at admission (85.31 ± 7.24) (t = 11.536, p < 0.001), indicating that stump revision and the related rehabilitation therapy improved amputees’ limb function. In this study, only the ADL scores at the time points of admission and discharge were collected and compared. Therefore, we could not analyze how long it took patients to improve their ADL scores. This is really a limitation and should be remedied in our future research.
III. The surgical management of stump problems
Stump trimmed surgery, also called as stump revision , is currently a good solution to stump problems, for which prosthesis and rehabilitation programs are usually less effective. Our study suggests that grasping the key points of stump revision surgery and an optimized surgical strategy are of paramount importance to the outcomes of stump revision. Revision should not be carried out when there is too much scar tissue and too little healthy normal skin, until the surrounding healthy skin could fully cover the wound through the techniques of pulling skin or water balloon dilation. Free skin grafting and free skin flap is not the first choice. There were six stumps with heavy scars in this study, water balloon dilation technique promoted coverage of the wound with adequate skin after the resection of the scar. After the amputation of the lower limb, longer or abduction fibula deformities will seriously affect the prosthesis matching and weight bearing. Fibular shortening and tibia-fibula synostosis are standard treatments. The synostosis could be achieved through Ertl’s procedure  or lag screw technique with or without bone grafting between tibia and fibula. Fourteen patients in this study have gained satisfactory tibia-fibula synostosis by using one of these two methods (Figure 4). For neuromas, we recommend using sharp dissection and nerve end ligation, followed by embedding the nerve end with epineurium. By not performing a myodesis or myoplasty during the primary amputation, conical stumps and bone protrusions under the skin can result (Figure 5a). Standard myodesis and myoplasty procedures were performed in stump revision (Figure 5b).
In short, stump problems after traumatic above-ankle amputations are significantly influences the functional rehabilitation of the residual stump. Encouraging outcomes are achieved through appropriate surgical revision management in this series. In China, the related science and clinical research in this area is still insufficient , further study is warranted.
In this series, stump problems secondary to traumatic lower limb amputation produced an effect on amputees’ ability to return to living and work, appropriate evaluation and timely surgical revision showed excellent results.
We are greatly indebted to Dr. Alan M Hirahara (Sacramento, CA, USA) for his careful editing of this manuscript. We sincerely thank all participants.
- MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC, Smith DG, Webb LX, Kellam JF, et al. Functional outcomes following trauma-related lower-extremity amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1636–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cui S. Current amputation concept and the amputative rehabilitation. Mod Rehabil J. 2002;6:3627–34.Google Scholar
- Cui S, Zhao L. The Non-ideal stump of the lower limb amputee and its clinical management. Chin J Rehabil. 1995;10:66–8.Google Scholar
- Cui S, Zhao H, Zhao L, Wang Z. A study of rehabilitation of the non ideal stumps impairing prosthesis dressing. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory & Practice. 2000;6:1–8.Google Scholar
- Ertl J. Uber Amputationsstiimpfe. Chirurg. 1949;20:218–24.Google Scholar
- Ihmant VT, Barnes GH, Levy SW, Loon HE, Ralston HJ. Medical problems of amputees. Calif Med. 1961;94:132–8.Google Scholar
- Burger H, Marincek C. Return to work after lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1323–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- T-r L, Shao-jun ZHANG. Clinical analysis and treatment of poor stumps after lower limb amputation. Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004;26:621–3.Google Scholar
- Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, Dijkstra PU. Skin problems of the stump in lower limb amputees: 1. A clinical study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011;91(2):173–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koc E, Tunca M, Akar A, Erbil AH, Demiralp B, Arca E. Skin problems in amputees: a descriptive study. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47(5):463–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, Dijkstra PU. Skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees: 2. Influence on functioning in daily life. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011;91(2):178–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burgess EM. Amputations. Surg Clin North Am. 1983;63:749–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wadwhani S. Prevalence of stump problems in a community sample of lower limb amputees. Leeds Medical School SSM Project: Leeds; 2001.Google Scholar
- Rotter K, Sanhueza R, Robles K, Godoy M. A descriptive study of traumatic lower limb amputees from the Hospital Hel Trabajador: clinical evolution from the accident until rehabilitation discharge. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006;30:81–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cui S. Attaching importance to improve the theory and technology for amputation. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics. 1997;17:183–6.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.