- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Generalized bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis patients followed for ten years in the biologic treatment era
© Haugeberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 20 June 2014
- Accepted: 21 August 2014
- Published: 2 September 2014
Osteoporosis is a well-known extra articular manifestation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Biologic disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to be superior to synthetic DMARDs to reduce bone destruction including generalized bone loss in RA. Our aim was to study short- and long term changes in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) in early RA patients treated during the first decade with available biologic DMARDs.
RA patients diagnosed at an out-patient clinic between 1999 and 2001 were consecutively enrolled. Demographic, disease and treatment data were collected and BMD was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 2, 5 and 10 years.
The 92 included RA patients had a baseline mean age (SD) of 50.9 (13.3) years and symptom duration of 12.4 (6.7) months, 62.0% were women and 66.3% were RF positive. In the first 2 years ever use of biologic DMARDs was 18.5%, synthetic DMARDs 91.3% and prednisolone 62.0% whereas the figures for the subsequent 8 years were 62.6%, 89.2% and 51.4%, respectively. The annual rate of BMD loss in the first 2 years and the subsequent 8 years was at femoral neck −1.00% vs. −0.56%, at total hip −0.96% vs. −0.41% and at spine L1−4 -0.42% vs. 0.00%.
Our study adds evidence that aggressive anti-inflammatory treatment including biologic DMARDs reduces the rate of bone loss in RA. Indicating that the burden of osteoporosis is reduced in RA patients treated in clinical practice in the new millennium.
- Bone Mineral Density
- Bone Loss
- Femoral Neck
- Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor
Osteoporosis and its clinical consequence fracture is a well-known extra articular manifestation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In both male and female RA populations the prevalence of reduced bone density has been reported to be doubled compared to the background population [1, 2]. Patients with RA are at increased risk for both vertebral  and non-vertebral fractures . Generalized bone loss assessed at hip or spine occurs early in the disease  and is related to inflammatory activity .
During the last 10–15 years the importance of treating RA patients towards remission or low disease activity using outcome measures has been well documented and become the recommended treatment strategy . In the same time period new potent anti-inflammatory drugs the biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has become available for clinical use . Treatment with biologic DMARDs, e.g. tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitors has been shown not only to reduce the development of erosion but also to reduce the rate of generalized bone loss in RA [9–11]. Studies have been performed to examine bone loss in RA [5, 6, 9–14]. These studies however are limited by their rather short observational period. Furthermore there is a lack of long term follow up studies following patients from the early phase of the disease.
Thus the primary aim of the present study was to examine short term and long term changes in bone density at hip and lumbar spine in patients with early RA treated during the last decade. Second to search for predictors and associates with change in bone density.
Patients, disease measures and treatment
In an out-patient rheumatology clinic between 1999 and 2001 patients diagnosed with RA were consecutively included in a prospective observational follow up study. The patients had to fulfil the American College of Rheumatology 1987 revised classification criteria for RA . According to protocol collection of demographic, clinical and treatment data was done at inclusion and after 6 months, 2, 5 and 10 years follow up. At all visits, data for demographic variables, disease characteristics, disease activity and health status were collected either by interview, clinical assessment, questionnaires or by reviewing the medical records. Disease activity was assessed by c-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the composite disease activity score (DAS) calculated from 28 swollen and 28 tender joint count and ESR (DAS28ESR3). We used DAS28ESR3 because data on patient’s global assessment used for DAS calculation was not collected. We also registered data for rheumatoid factor (RF) at baseline and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) during follow up. Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) was used for assessment of physical function .
At all visits the use of prednisolone and synthetic and biologic DMARDs were registered. Furthermore treatment information in-between the visits were collected based on information in the medical records which also included the use of intra-muscular and intra-articular glucocorticosteroids (GC) and osteoporosis treatment. Cumulative doses of GC were calculated and transformed into prednisolone equivalent doses.
At 10 years visit serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (s-25(OH) D) was measured. Severe vitamin D deficiency was defined as s-25(OH) D levels lower than 12.5 nmol/l and moderate deficiency as 12.5-25 nmol/l .
Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed at baseline, 2, 5 and 10 years follow up using the same dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) equipment (Lunar Prodogy). Trained osteoporosis nurses performed all standardized BMD measurements at hip (femoral neck and total hip) and lumbar spine L1-4. Left hip was measured. If left hip could not be measured the right hip was measured. The DXA machine was stable for the whole period. Long term spine phantom precision expressed as coefficient of variation (CV) was 0.68%. In vivo-short term precision based on duplicate measurement of 30 individuals was for femoral neck left side 1.93% and right side 1.80%, for total hip left side 0.79% and right side 0.75% and for spine L1-4 0.88%.
Analysis and statistical tests
Due to a delay in installing the DXA machine at the hospital prior to study start, BMD in the first 42 included RA patients could not be measured at baseline. Missing baseline BMD values was calculated from the patient’s 2 years BMD value and adjusted for the mean percentage change calculated from all patients with available baseline and 2 years BMD data. In patients with missing DXA data between two measurement time points missing BMD was calculated using the annual percentage change adjusted for the time period. The BMD data were analyzed with the available data and with imputation of missing data separately.
For descriptive statistics continuous variables with normal distribution was presented as mean with standard deviation (SD) or with 95% confidence interval (CI) whereas variables with non-normal distribution also were presented with median and interquartile range [IQR]. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentage.
Percentage BMD change between DXA measurement periods was calculated.
For group comparison, we used t-test for continuous variables if normal distributed and Mann–Whitney U test if not normal distributed and chi-square test for categorical variables.
To explore for predictors and associates with change in BMD for the period 0–2 years and 2–10 years, we used unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analysis. For the multivariate linear regression models we used forward procedure. Included were variables with a p value ≤0.1 tested in univariate linear regression.
Statistical tests were performed using PASW Statistics 18 (IBM SPSS statistics). Significance level was p < 0.05.
Ethics and legal aspects
The study was approved by the regional committee for ethics and medical research, health region II in Norway (REK-S-98093). All patients gave written informed consent before inclusion.
Patients, disease measures and treatment
Baseline characteristics in 92 early rheumatoid arthritis patients
Females in menopause (n = 51)*
Symptom/disease duration (months)
Anti-CCP positive, (n = 82)** †
High titer CCP positive >3X‡ (n = 82)**
RF positive, (n = 86)*
High titer RF positive >3X‡ (n = 86)**
CRP (mg/dl) (n = 90)**
MHAQ (0–3) (n = 91)**
Disease measures and treatment in 92 early rheumatoid arthritis patients followed for 10 years
Period 0–2 years (n = 92)
Period 2–10 years (n = 74)
Mean ESR (mm/hr)
Mean CRP (mg/dl)
Mean MHAQ (0–3)
Ever users synthetic DMARDs
Ever users methotrexate
Ever users biologic DMARDs
Ever users prednisolone
Ever users any GC***
Mean prednisolone equivalent dose (gram)****
The ever use of biologic DMARDs increased from 18.5% in the period 0–2 years to 62.6% in the period 2–10 years. All patients treated with biologic DMARDs had been using TNF inhibitors. The median dose among users of prednisolone was 5.0 mg at all follow up visits with a range of 2.5 mg to 15.0 mg. No statistically significant differences were seen between men, pre- and post-menopausal women on the use of synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, prednisolone, any GC use or cumulative GC dose for the two first years and the subsequent eight years of follow up.
During follow up minor differences between men and women and between pre- and post-menopausal women was found for disease measures and treatment listed in Table 2.
During follow up 16.3% (5 men and 10 women) were using anti-resportive osteoporosis treatment (ART), 4 oestrogen and 11 bisphosphonates and 70.7% (23 men and 42 women) were using calcium and/or vitamin D.
At 10 years visit 93.2% (69 out of 74 patients) had vitamin D measured. Mean (SD) value for s-25(OH) D was 72.9 (26.1) nmol/l. None had severe vitamin D deficiency (<12.5 nmol/l) and only two patients had moderate vitamin D deficiency (12.5-25.0 nmol/l).
No statistically significant differences in BMD change were seen between men and pre-menopausal women for the 0–2 years and the 2–10 years period apart from annual change in bone density at spine L1-4 for the 2–10 years period. Between men and post-menopausal women a statistically significant difference in change in bone density was seen at hip and spine for the 2–10 years period but not for the 0–2 year period.
No statistically significant difference in bone change during follow up was seen either between never and ever users of ART.
Validity of BMD results using imputation of missing data
Between patients with and without DXA baseline values no significant difference was seen for BMD at femoral neck, total hip and spine L1-4 at 2, 5 and 10 years follow up, or for changes in bone density between 2 and 5, 2 and 10 and 5 and 10 years follow up. Further no statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups for variables listed in Tables 1 and 2, this both at baseline, at 2 years follow up and in-between.When only patients with available data at all visits were analyzed the same magnitude and pattern of bone loss was seen compared to when data were handled with imputation of missing data as shown in Figure 1. The mean BMD change for baseline-2 years, baseline-5 years and baseline-10 years follow up was at femoral neck (n = 36) −1.75%, −4.61%, −6.83% at total hip (n = 36) −1.07%, −3.20%, −4.81% and at spine L1-4 (n = 28) −0.54%, −1.33% and −1.55%, respectively.
One patient had an ankle and a femur fracture and two patients had clinical costa fracture during follow up.
Associates with change in bone density during follow up
The baseline variables listed in Table 1 and mean values of disease measures (ESR, CRP, DAS28ESR3 and MHAQ,) and treatment (ART, DMARDs, biologic DMARDs and GC) during follow up listed in Table 2 was one by one tested for their association with bone loss for the first 0–2 year period and for the 2–10 year period.
For the baseline disease measures ESR, CRP, DAS28ESR3 and MHAQ a statistically significant or a border significant association with bone loss was only found for the 0–2 year period for MHAQ (B-0.015 P = 0.047) and DAS28ESR3 (B-0.007, P = 0.051) at femoral neck and for ESR (B 0.000 P = 0.050), DAS28ESR3 (B −0.018 P < 0.001) and MHAQ (B-0.030 P = 0.004) at spine L1-4.
Associates with bone loss in 92 rheumatoid arthritis patients followed for 10 years
Change in bone mineral density
B 0.244 P = 0.048
B-0.029 P = 0.027
B-0.039 P = 0.004
B-0.104 P = 0.000
B-0.033 P = 0.049
B 0.016 P = 0.076
B-0.053 P = 0.003
B-0.051 P = 0.063
B-0.028 p = 0.036
B-0.024 P = 0.080
B-0.030 P = 0.030
B-0.029 P = 0.047
B-0.053 P = 0.044
B −0.027 p = 0.034
B-0.189 P = 0.092
B −0.010 P = 0.030
B-0.015 P = 0.057
B-0.016 P = 0.055
B-0.013 P = 0.037
Ever use of biologic DMARDs (N/Y)
B-0.023 P = 0.024
B-0.019 P = 0.058
B-0.023 P = 0.091
B-0.052 P = 0.039
Cumulative equivalent prednisolon (gram)
B-0.002 P = 0.024
B-0.003 P = 0.003
In the multivariable models with forward procedure variable independently associated with loss in BMD for the 0–2 years period was for femoral neck ever use of biologic DMARDs (B −0.023, p = 0.024), for total hip cumulative dose of GC (B −0.003, p = 0.003) and for spine L1-4 DAS28ESR3 (B −0.013, p = 0.037). Variables independently associated with change in bone density for the 2–10 years follow up period was for femoral neck menopause (B −0.042, p = 0.001) and smoking (B −0.034, p = 0.008), for total hip menopause (B −0.059, p < 0.001) and smoking (B −0.033, p = 0.011) and for spine L1-4 female gender (B −0.105, p < 0.001) and RF (B −0.056, p = 0.015).
In our prospective observational study of early RA patients the annual rate of bone loss was higher in the 0–2 year period compared with the 2–10 year period. This was however only seen in men and in premenopausal women and not in post-menopausal women. In the 0–2 year period disease and treatment variables were more frequently found to be associated with bone loss than well known risk factors for osteoporosis e.g. smoking and post-menopausal status, whereas the opposite was seen for the 2–10 years period.
A high rate of generalized bone loss in early RA patients has been reported from the pre-biologic era [5, 6]. In one study the annual rate of bone loss was reported to be −3.6% at femoral neck and −2.1% at lumbar spine  and in another study −1.7% at femoral neck and −2.7% at lumbar spine . These figures are significantly higher than found in our study. This is most likely explained by the high proportion of patients treated with biologic DMARDs in our study. In the 0–2 year period 18.5% and in the 2–10 year period 62.6% were ever users of biologic DMARDs.
In the literature there is convincing evidence that treatment with TNF inhibitors reduces generalized bone loss in RA patients [9–11]. The bone protective effect of TNF inhibitors in RA patients may not only be explained by the strong anti-inflammatory properties of TNF inhibitors. Anti-TNF therapy has been shown to reduce radiographic joint damage and peri-articular bone loss in RA independent of clinical response [18, 19].
GCs are known as potent anti-inflammatory drugs and are frequently used in RA, however, they also cause osteoporosis [20, 21]. In RA this negative effect of GC on bone has been questioned. Studies have even reported BMD to increase in RA patients using GC [9, 14]. In our study neither ever use of prednisolone nor ever use of any GC was found to be associated with bone loss. Only for cumulative equivalent prednisolone doses a significant association in adjusted analysis was found to be associated with bone loss but only at total hip in the 0–2 year period. This must be interpreted with cautiousness as ever use of biologic DMARDs also was found to be significantly associated with bone loss at femoral neck in the first 2 years. This may be explained by that both the use of biologic treatment and GC in our observational study behaves as a surrogate marker for disease activity. It is important to emphasize that bone density data cannot directly be translated into reduced fracture risk in patients treated with GC because patients using GC may have a higher risk of fracture independent of the BMD level .
In our cohort of 92 RA patients with mean age 51 years at baseline one patient had an ankle and femur fracture and two other patients suffered clinical costa fracture during follow up. These numbers of new fractures seem to be low. In a 5 year follow up study of 102 female RA patients mean age 61 years with disease duration 17 years 16% of the patients had a new non vertebral fracture and 19% had a new vertebral fracture on spine X-ray during follow up . In two studies using data from health care utilization databases, commercial insurance plan databases or administrative health care databases no association between use of biologic therapy and risk of fractures was shown [4, 24]. One hypothesis explaining this negative finding may be that patients treated with biologic drugs had a higher disease activity than patients not staring treatment with biologics, thus having a higher risk of fracture prior to treatment which then was reduced during treatment. In RA patients registered in the American CORRONA registry postmenopausal status, high mHAQ and prednisolone use was found to be associated with increased risk of fracture whereas the use of TNF alone but not in combination with methotrexate was reported to be associated with reduced fracture risk .
In our study we found no association between use of ART and rate of bone loss. ART however has been shown to reduce bone loss in RA . Surprisingly in our male RA patients bone density at lumbar spine increased in the 2–10 years period. As we describe in the Results section this was explained by new bone formation seen more frequently in men than in women.
Our study does have limitations. One obvious limitation of this study is the missing baseline BMD data from a rather large proportion of included RA patients. The same pattern and range of change in BMD using imputation of missing data was however also seen when patients with available data for all four time points was analyzed. Thus we believe the missing BMD data at baseline is not a crucial limitation of our study. Lack of standardization of treatment also makes it difficult to explore for associations. However on the other hand our study reflects the bone density outcome in early RA patients aggressively treated in ordinary daily clinical practice in the new millennium. Unfortunately our study was not design to explore the prevalence and incidence of vertebral fractures.
The study design without having age and gender matched controls from the background population is another obvious limitation. Comparing our data with previous reports on bone loss in non-RA populations may indicate that bone loss in RA patients with more suppressed inflammation as seen in the 2–10 years period approaches the levels reported in the literature [26–29]. In a Finnish population the annual rate of BMD loss was estimated in cross sectional studies to be −0.2% at lumbar spine and −0.3% at femoral neck in men,  and in females above 39 years −0.7% and −1.3%, respectively . However, in a population followed longitudinally annual percentage bone loss at total hip was reported to be 0.0% in men and −0.2% in women .
In conclusion our study adds evidence that aggressive treatment of inflammation especially with biologic DMARDs in early RA reduces the rate of bone loss significantly. These findings are promising and encouraging as they indicate that modern aggressive treatment can reduce the burden of osteoporosis in RA patients. Future fracture studies however are needed to confirm if osteoporotic fractures in RA are reduced in the new millennium.
We gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance and help with data collection from Bodil Bjørnebye, Torun Dahl, Lise Nordheim Hoel, Solvor Bergesen. Further we thank statistician Are Pripp for his statistical advice.
- Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK: Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 394 patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis register. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43: 522-530. 10.1002/1529-0131(200003)43:3<522::AID-ANR7>3.0.CO;2-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK: Reduced bone mineral density in male rheumatoid arthritis patients: frequencies and associations with demographic and disease variables in ninety-four patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis Register. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43: 2776-2784. 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2776::AID-ANR18>3.0.CO;2-N.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orstavik RE, Haugeberg G, Mowinckel P, Hoiseth A, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, McCloskey E, Kvien TK: Vertebral deformities in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with population-based controls. Arch Intern Med. 2004, 164: 420-425. 10.1001/archinte.164.4.420.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SY, Schneeweiss S, Liu J, Daniel GW, Chang CL, Garneau K, Solomon DH: Risk of osteoporotic fracture in a large population-based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010, 12: R154-10.1186/ar3107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Haugeberg G, Morton S, Emery P, Conaghan PG: Effect of intra-articular corticosteroid injections and inflammation on periarticular and generalised bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011, 70: 184-187. 10.1136/ard.2009.128124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gough AK, Lilley J, Eyre S, Holder RL, Emery P: Generalised bone loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 1994, 344: 23-27. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91049-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Breedveld FC, Boumpas D, Burmester G, Combe B, Cutolo M, de Wit M, Dougados M, Emery P, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Haraoui B, Kalden J, Keystone EC, Kvien TK, McInnes I, Martin-Mola E, Montecucco C, Schoels M, van der Heijde D: Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010, 69: 631-637. 10.1136/ard.2009.123919.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Koeller M, Weisman MH, Emery P: New therapies for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2007, 370: 1861-1874. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60784-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wijbrandts CA, Klaasen R, Dijkgraaf MG, Gerlag DM, van Eck-Smit BL, Tak PP: Bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis patients 1 year after adalimumab therapy: arrest of bone loss. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 373-376. 10.1136/ard.2008.091611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vis M, Havaardsholm EA, Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Voskuyl AE, van de Stadt RJ, Dijkmans BA, Woolf AD, Kvien TK, Lems WF: Evaluation of bone mineral density, bone metabolism, osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of the NFkappaB ligand serum levels during treatment with infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006, 65: 1495-1499. 10.1136/ard.2005.044198.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Haugeberg G, Conaghan PG, Quinn M, Emery P: Bone loss in patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis: infliximab and methotrexate compared with methotrexate treatment alone. Explorative analysis from a 12-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 1898-1901. 10.1136/ard.2008.106484.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haugeberg G, Orstavik RE, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK: Bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a population-based cohort of 366 patients followed up for two years. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46: 1720-1728. 10.1002/art.10408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kroot EJ, Nieuwenhuizen MG, de Waal Malefijt MC, van Riel PL, Pasker-de Jong PC, Laan RF: Change in bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during the first decade of the disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44: 1254-1260. 10.1002/1529-0131(200106)44:6<1254::AID-ART216>3.0.CO;2-G.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Habib GS, Haj S: Bone mineral density in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with corticosteroids. Clin Rheumatol. 2005, 24: 129-133. 10.1007/s10067-004-0989-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS, Medsger TA, Mitchell DM, Neustadt DH, Pinals RS, Schaller JG, Sharp JT, Wilder RL, Hunder GG: The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988, 31: 315-324. 10.1002/art.1780310302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA, Wallston KA, Hummon NP: Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 1983, 26: 1346-1353. 10.1002/art.1780261107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lips P: Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2001, 22: 477-501. 10.1210/edrv.22.4.0437.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smolen JS, Han C, van der Heijde DM, Emery P, Bathon JM, Keystone E, Maini RN, Kalden JR, Aletaha D, Baker D, Han J, Bala M, St Clair EW: Radiographic changes in rheumatoid arthritis patients attaining different disease activity states with methotrexate monotherapy and infliximab plus methotrexate: the impacts of remission and tumour necrosis factor blockade. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 823-827. 10.1136/ard.2008.090019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emery P, Genovese MC, van Vollenhoven R, Sharp JT, Patra K, Sasso EH: Less radiographic progression with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate monotherapy across the spectrum of clinical response in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2009, 36: 1429-1441. 10.3899/jrheum.081018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhen T, Cidlowski JA: Antiinflammatory action of glucocorticoids–new mechanisms for old drugs. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 1711-1723. 10.1056/NEJMra050541.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canalis E: Clinical review 83: mechanisms of glucocorticoid action in bone: implications to glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996, 81: 3441-3447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Staa TP, Laan RF, Barton IP, Cohen S, Reid DM, Cooper C: Bone density threshold and other predictors of vertebral fracture in patients receiving oral glucocorticoid therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48: 3224-3229. 10.1002/art.11283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vis M, Haavardsholm EA, Boyesen P, Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Hoff M, Woolf A, Dijkmans B, Lems W, Kvien TK: High incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in the OSTRA cohort study: a 5-year follow-up study in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos Int. 2011, 22: 2413-2419. 10.1007/s00198-010-1517-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kawai VK, Grijalva CG, Arbogast PG, Curtis JR, Solomon DH, Delzell E, Chen L, Ouellet-Hellstrom R, Herrinton L, Liu L, Mitchell EF, Stein CM, Griffin MR: Initiation of tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists and risk of fractures in patients with selected rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Care Res. 2013, 65: 1085-1094.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Coulson KA, Reed G, Gilliam BE, Kremer JM, Pepmueller PH: Factors influencing fracture risk, T score, and management of osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) registry. J Clin Rheumatol. 2009, 15: 155-160. 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181a5679d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warming L, Hassager C, Christiansen C: Changes in bone mineral density with age in men and women: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int. 2002, 13: 105-112. 10.1007/s001980200001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kroger H, Laitinen K: Bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal men. Eur J Clin Invest. 1992, 22: 454-460. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1992.tb01490.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kroger H, Heikkinen J, Laitinen K, Kotaniemi A: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: a cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers. Osteoporos Int. 1992, 2: 135-140. 10.1007/BF01623820.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melton LJ, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, Oconnor MK, Ofallon WM, Riggs BL: Cross-sectional versus longitudinal evaluation of bone loss in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2000, 11: 592-599. 10.1007/s001980070080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/289/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.