Skip to content


  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Study protocol: the effect of whole body vibration on acute unilateral unstable lateral ankle sprain- a biphasic randomized controlled trial

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1Email author and
  • 2
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201314:22

  • Received: 29 October 2012
  • Accepted: 3 January 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Ankle sprains often result in ankle instability, which is most likely caused by damage to passive structures and neuromuscular impairment. Whole body vibration (WBV) is a neuromuscular training method improving those impaired neurologic parameters. The aim of this study is to compare the current gold standard functional treatment to functional treatment plus WBV in patients with acute unilateral unstable inversion ankle sprains.


60 patients, aged 18–40 years, presenting with an isolated, unilateral, acute unstable inversion ankle sprain will be included in this bicentric, biphasic, randomized controlled trial. Samples will be randomized by envelope drawing. All patients will be allowed early mobilization and pain-dependent weight bearing, limited functional immobilization by orthosis, PRICE, NSARDs as well as home and supervised physiotherapy. Supervised physical therapy will take place twice a week, for 30 minutes for a period of 6 weeks, following a standardized intervention protocol. During supervised physical therapy, the intervention group will perform exercises similar to those of the control group, on a side-alternating sinusoidal vibration platform. Two time-dependent primary outcome parameters will be assessed: short-term outcome after six weeks will be postural control quantified by the sway index; mid-term outcome after one year will be assessed by subjective instability, defined by the presence of giving-way attacks. Secondary outcome parameters include: return to pre-injury level of activities, residual pain, recurrence, objective instability, energy/coordination, Foot and Ankle Disability Index and EQ 5D.


This is the first trial investigating the effects of WBV in patients with acute soft tissue injury. Inversion ankle sprains often result in ankle instability, which is most likely due to damage of neurological structures. Due to its unique, frequency dependent, influence on various neuromuscular parameters, WBV is a promising treatment method for patients with acute unstable inversion ankle sprains.

Trial registration



  • Whole body vibration
  • Ankle sprain
  • Rehabilitation
  • Functional treatment


Lateral ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries[1, 2]. They mostly result from an internal rotation and adduction of the plantarflexed foot with subsequent damage to the lateral capsulo-ligamentous complex. About 65% of all lateral ankle sprains are isolated anterior tibio-fibular ligament (ATFL) injuries, while 20% are combined ATFL and calcano-fibular ligament injuries[3]. 85% of all ankle injuries are ankle sprains and 85% of those are inversion sprains[4], with about one ankle sprain occurring per 10.000 people every day[5]. Although usually considered an innocuous injury, three-year full recovery rates range from 36% to 85%[6].

Ankle instability is most likely caused by damage to passive structures and neuromuscular impairment[7]. Damage to passive structures, i.e. capsular structure and ligaments, results in objective (anterior drawer, talar tilt) and subjective instability (giving-way)[3]. Neurological impairments include muscle fatigue[79], reduced dynamic balance[1012] and impaired postural control[1315]. Although not all patients with functional (FAI) or chronic ankle instability (CAI) present with objective instability, they are all thought to have neuromuscular impairments[2, 16, 17]. This results in lower physical activity levels[18], diminished quality of life[19], and a possible increase in the risk of osteoarthritis[20, 21].

Any treatment plan should therefore address both damaged passive structures and neuromuscular impairment. Generally, three treatment regimens are available: functional treatment (early mobilization and bracing), cast immobilization for 2–6 weeks, or operative treatment[22, 23]. A Cochrane review from 2007 comparing conservative and surgical treatments found similar outcomes[3]. Therefore, functional treatment has to be considered the current gold standard. Functional treatment should allow healing of damaged passive structures and compensate for neuromuscular impairments, i.e. improve muscle strength and proprioception. Physical therapy therefore includes stretching, body-weight exercises, training apparatus and devices (for example wobble board training). Supervised rehabilitation has proven superior to conventional treatment[24, 25].

A neuromuscular training method gaining increased attention is whole body vibration (WBV). WBV involves synchronous or side-alternating sinusoidal vibrations, which are transmitted to the body via platforms. It is believed to evoke muscle contractions via stretch reflexes in the muscle spindle system[2628]. A growing body of evidence indicates improvements of various neuromuscular parameters following WBV, such as power, strength, movement velocity, range of motion and balance[2938]. Reports to the contrary[39, 40] may be due to heterogeneous patient populations and varying intervention protocols, which in turn can be due to limited knowledge of the dose-effect relationship, i.e. vibration frequency and amplitude.

In general, frequencies <10Hz are believed to loosen muscle and tissue. Frequencies >10Hz and <20Hz still allow active contraction and relaxation of muscle fibers and are used for coordination exercises. Frequencies >20Hz result in isotonic muscle contraction[41]. Vibration amplitude seems to be positively correlated to muscle activity[4244]. Although WBV has numerous contraindications, as listed in Table 1, the only adverse side effects reported are temporary hyposensitivity of the foot soles[45].
Table 1

Inclusion- and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Age: 18 to 40 years


Acute, unilateral, unstable, inversion ankle sprain (Grade II, III)

Conditions affecting the neuromuscular or musculoskeletal system

Signed informed consent

Previous surgical interventions to the foot, ankle, knee or hip; known FAI, CAI

Patient can read and understand German

Conditions possibly affecting balance


Cardiovascular disease including thrombosis


Respiratory diseases


Abdominal diseases (including gallstones)


Urological diseases (including kidney and bladder stones)


Gynaecological diseases and + intrauterine devices


Neurological diseases including epilepsy within the last 2 years


Acute injuries to the head


Patient is not available for follow-up visits


Patient unable to give informed consent


Patient suspected to be non-compliant

Functional classification system for lateral ankle sprains: Grade II: hematoma/swelling/pain on palpation and positive anterior drawer test (complete tear of the ATFL, incomplete tear of the CFL); Grade III: hematoma/swelling/pain on palpation and positive anterior drawer test and positive talar tilt test (complete tear of the ATFL and CFL); adapted from[4648]; FAI: Functional ankle instability; CAI: Chronic ankle instability.

With WBV improving range of motion (ROM), power and balance - parameters known to be affected in patients with ankle instability - it might be beneficial to include it into the current functional treatment regime. To our knowledge only one study investigated the effects of WBV in patients with ankle instability. Cloak at al.[49] conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on functional ankle instability in dancers (n=38), comparing WBV to a control group (regular dance training). The WBV group yielded significantly better results for balance (STAR extrusion balance test) as well as a significantly reduced Center of Pressure values.

Aim of study

The aim of this bicentric, biphasic, randomized, controlled study is to compare current gold standard functional treatment to functional treatment plus WBV in patients with acute unilateral unstable inversion ankle sprains over a period of 12 months.


  1. 1.

    Short term results (after 6 weeks): H0 = Functional treatment in combination with WBV therapy in patients with acute unilateral unstable inversion ankle sprains does not improve the Sway-Index compared to functional treatment alone.

  2. 2.

    Mid-term results (after 12 months): H0 = Functional treatment in combination with WBV therapy in patients with acute unilateral unstable inversion ankle sprains does not result in a reduction of the recurrence rate compared to functional treatment alone.



Study design and protocol

The study design is a bicentric, biphasic, randomized, controlled trial, following the CONSORT statement guidelines[50]. 60 patients will be randomized into an intervention (supervised functional treatment and WBV) or control group (supervised functional treatment). Intervention will take place twice a week at a rate of 30 minutes per session, for 6 weeks. Figure 1 schematically illustrates the study protocol.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of the study protocol. ER = Emergency Department; Dia & Inc & Ran = Diagnosis, inclusion and randomization of patient; Pat. inform = Patient information; T to Treatment = maximum time interval between patient inclusion and first treatment intervention; D = day; W = week; M = month; Red diamond = Patient visits; Green segments = short-term/mid-term analysis.

The study design is in accordance with the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Munich (#315-12) and the Medical University of Innsbruck (#UN4833). The study is registered as a randomized controlled trial (NCT01702597).

Study centers, population, screening and randomization

The study will be conducted at the Department of Surgery, Medical University of Munich (LMU), Germany, and the Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria. Patients will be screened within the regular emergency unit setting using a standardized algorithm for ankle sprains[51]. Patients presenting with an isolated, unilateral, acute unstable ankle sprain grade II or III (as defined in Table 1), aged 18–40 years, will be informed about the study and potential risks before signing the informed consent. In case initial classification is not possible (i.e. patients do not tolerate medical examinations), patients will be invited for a delayed physical examination four to seven days following trauma. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table1. Within seven days, participating patients must be included and randomized by envelope drawing.


All patients will be allowed early mobilization and pain-dependent weight bearing, functional immobilization by orthosis, PRICE (protection, rest, ice, compression, elevation), NSAIDs as well as home and supervised physiotherapy. Patients will receive a standardized handout for home training. Table 2 outlines the standardized supervised intervention protocol for both groups, taking into consideration the different soft tissue healing phases. The functional treatment protocol was developed based on treatment guidelines published by the Royal Dutch Society of Physical Therapy[52] and is similar to previous treatment protocols[5356]. Patients will receive supervised physiotherapy twice a week for 6 weeks[5759] with each session lasting 30 minutes. Patients will be asked to do home exercises according to the handout every second day.
Table 2

Detailed treatment protocol





Treatment Goals








0 - 3d

▪ Pain at rest

▪ Reduction of pain and swelling



▪ Swelling and hematoma

▪ Improvement of perfusion



▪ Pain during weight bearing

▪ Partial weight bearing

▪ Pain-dependent weight bearing +/- crutches


▪ Pain-dependent mobilization of the foot


▪ No tape or brace (due to swelling)



4 - 10d

▪ Foot can actively be put into neutral position

▪ Restoring function


Frequency 10Hz / 16 Hz


▪ Reduction of swelling

▪ Restoring full weight bearing

▪ Pain-dependent weight bearing +/- crutches

Amplitude: s. below


▪ Partial weight bearing without complete heel-to-toe movement


▪ Arch of foot / leg axis

Duration: 5min


▪ Possible fear of movement


▪ Training of symmetrical gait and regular foot strike

Exercises, vibration:


▪ Exercises to improve ROM, active stabilization, coordination and regular walking pattern

 ▪ Gymnastic ball, feet parallel to mark 1 or 2, patient rolls forth and back, in order to Flex/Ext. in the upper ankle joint


▪ Brace

 ▪ Gymnastic ball, injured foot placed transverse on the WBV platform (ankle in-between mark 0 and 1), patient rolls forth and back, in order to flex/extent in the upper ankle joint


Exercises, general:


 ▪ Pain dependent weight bearing +/- Crutches


 ▪ Walking motion training


Early Remod.

11 - 21d

▪ Residual hematoma

▪ Improving muscular strength, and active/ functional ankle stability, and ROM

▪ Information on preventive measures (Brace)

Frequency: >10Hz, 18-24Hz


▪ Normal heal-to-toe movement

▪ Training regular walking pattern and climbing stairs

▪ Exercises to improve balance, ROM, muscle strength, walking pattern, running and climbing the stairs

Amplitude: 1-2,5mm


▪ Pain and fear of movement under load


▪ Dynamic stability: stepwise increase of training intensity; switching from static to dynamic exercises

Duration: 3 Sets a 3 Min with 2 Min break each


▪ Guidance for home training

Exercises, vibration:


 1) Dynamic squatting (warm-up)


 2) Dynamic squatting (increasing depth)


 3) Two leg stance with slightly bend knees, slow weight transfer (right ←→ left)


 4) One-leg squatting, transverse to WBV plate +/- support of the non-injured leg


Exercises, general:


 ▪ Guidance for home training


Late Remod.

3 - 6wk

▪ No hematoma

▪ Improvement of resistance during walking, running, climbing stairs

▪ Exercises to improve coordination (skipping, jumping, …)

Frequency: >10Hz, 18-24Hz


▪ Dorsal flexion possible

▪ Improvement of work/sports specific tasks

▪ Stepwise load increase and switching from static to dynamic / from simple to complex / from cyclic to non-cyclic exercises

Amplitude: 2-3mm


▪ No more pain or fear of movement during sports


▪ Guidance for home training

Duration: 3 Sets a 3 Min with 2 Min break each


Exercises, vibration:


 1) Dynamic squatting (warm-up)


 2) Side-skipping with flexed knees


 3) Calf raises


 4) Vibration on a tilted surface, elevated leg = uninjured leg


 5) Static squats (45° / 90°); Frequency 18+, Amplitude 2+


Exercises, general:


 ▪ Guidance for home training

Lvl: Level; Phase: Healing phases; d: days; Remod.: Remodeling; Inflam.: Inflammatory phase; Prolif.: Proliferation phase; wk: week; PRICE: Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation; NSARDs: Non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs; ROM: Range of motion; min: Minutes; Hz: Herz; mm: Millimeter; WBV: Whole body vibration; Min: Minute.

The intervention group will use a sinusoidal side alternating vibration system (Galileo® Med M Plus, Novotec, Pforzheim, Germany) with a peak-to-peak displacement range from 0–9 with 5–30 Hz acceleration. They will perform similar exercises as the control group on the vibration platform and the overall session duration will be the same. The detailed WBV intervention protocol is presented in the Additional file1.

Physiotherapists who will receive specific training for the WBV prior to this study will supervise all training sessions.

Outcome parameters

The in Table 3 outlined outcome parameters are the most frequently used in ankle sprain literature[3, 22, 25]. Neuromuscular impairment will be assessed using a Leonardo Mechanograph GRFP (16 bit, 800 Hz; NOVOTEC Medical GmbH, Germany) and are marked with a * in Table 3. Each test will be performed following the manufacturer’s instructions, with the patients not having participated in sports 24h prior to data acquisition. Tests will be conducted as soon as tolerated by patient.
Table 3

Complete list of outcome parameters

Primary Outcome parameter (1)


(short term; 6 weeks)


Postural control: Balance Test (Sway Index)*

[numeric, scale]

Primary Outcome parameter (2)


(mid-term; 1 year)


Subjective Instability (Giving-way)

[dichotomous variable]

Secondary Outcome parameters


Return to pre-injury level of activity (work, sports)

[dichotomous variable]

Residual pain:


 Pain at rest

[dichotomous variable; VAS]

 Pain on weight-bearing

[dichotomous variable; VAS]

 Pain during sports

[dichotomous variable; VAS]

Subjective Instability (Giving-way)

[dichotomous variable]


[dichotomous variable]

Objective instability:


 Anterior drawer

[dichotomous variable]

 Talar tilt

[dichotomous variable]

Ankle ROM

[numeric, scale]

Postural control: Balance Test (Sway index)*

[numeric, scale]



 Multiple one leg hopping*

[numeric, scale]

 Single two leg jump*

[numeric, scale]





 Foot and Ankle Disability Index[60]

[numeric, scale]

 EQ 5D 5L

[numeric, scale]

Sample size estimation and statistics

With this study being the first using WBV with acutely injured patients, data to conduct sample size estimation is lacking. Therefore sample size was chosen according to previous studies on WBV or ankle instability[32, 49, 61, 62].

Statistical methods used will include descriptive statistics, Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test.

Adverse events

The only adverse side effects of WBV reported in literature were temporary hyposensitivity of the foot soles[45]. Possible adverse events related to the interventions include pain, fall from the WBV device/wobble board, and delayed mobilization or healing. Unexpected events related to data acquisition might be patients’ inability to perform certain load-dependent examinations. Severe adverse events are only expected following a fall from the training device.


The present study protocol on the effect of WBV in patients with acute, unilateral, unstable inversion ankle sprains is the first study to apply WBV in patients with acute soft tissue injuries. Due to its influence on various neuromuscular parameters, which are known to be impaired in patients with ankle instability, WBV provides a novel, functional treatment approach for this problem.

Several limitations of the present protocol must be discussed. First of all, the authors have decided to use a functional classification system. With ankle instability being the most important parameter for further treatment decision, an established functional classification system was chosen. Ankles are classified into stable or unstable based on clinical presentation and examination (swelling, anterior drawer test and talar tilt test)[4648]. In case initial examination is not tolerated, delayed physical examination has been shown to be equal to arthrography (specificity/sensitivity: 85%/96%)[6365]. Its feasibility in daily practice and high sensitivity makes it a suitable classification system for patients with acute inversion ankle sprains.

Second, as discussed in the introduction, functional treatment seems to be the current gold standard treatment approach. Still, immobilization, as well as type and duration of physiotherapy are a matter of discussion. Kerkhoffs et al.[66] conducted a systematic review on the effectiveness of various braces/bracing methods for acute ankle sprains and found lace-up supports to be the most effective, which seems supported by a Cochrane Review[3]. A recent single-blinded RCT by Lamb et al.[67] found a short period of immobilization in an Aircast brace to result in faster recovery than double-layered tubular compression bandage. This is in line with a review by Kemle et al.[23] who found evidence pointing towards the superiority of ankle braces. Consequently, initial immobilization will be realized with an ankle brace. Moreover, the type and duration of functional rehabilitation remains unclear. Our supervised rehabilitation protocol is based on the guidelines of the Royal Dutch Society of Physical Therapy[52], which is comparable to other published treatment protocols[5357, 68]. Although the optimal intensity of physical rehabilitation remains unclear, 45 minutes, twice to three times a week over a period of 6–8 weeks seem to be beneficial[10, 5759, 69]. Due to administrative issues, we decided on supervised rehabilitation for 30 minutes, twice weekly for 6 weeks, with additional home exercises.

A third possible limitation are the chosen outcome parameters. Whereas power, assessed by a single leg vertical jump, has been proven significantly different between patients with recurrent ankle sprains and healthy controls[14, 7072], there is no consensus in literature as to which method best assesses balance. A commonly used method is center of pressure (COP)[7376]. Whereas COP assessed during single leg stance with eyes open was ineffective in identifying patients with ankle instability[73, 74], this could be achieved with single leg stance with eyes closed[75, 76]. Furthermore, COP provides an objectively verifiable parameter. Other commonly used outcome parameters such as return to work or return to sports are parameters not necessarily coinciding with the recovery of the injured ankle. They highly depend on the patient’s attitude attitude, schedules and type of job/sport.



Whole Body Vibration


Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation


Non-Steroidal Antirheumatic Drugs




Anterior Tibio-Fibular Ligament


Functional Ankle Instability


Chronic Ankle Instability




Range Of Motion


Randomized Controlled Trial








Center Of Pressure.



The authors would like to thank Ms. J. Ebner-Daigle, MO, MA for proofreading.


The study is supported by a small research grand of the MMW-Stiftung.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Surgery, Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria


  1. McCulloch PG, Holden P, Robson DJ, Rowley DI, Norris SH: The value of mobilisation and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesia in the management of inversion injuries of the ankle. Br J Clin Pract. 1985, 39: 69-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hertel J: Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2002, 37: 364-375.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Struijs PAA, Marti RK, Assendelft WJJ, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN: Different functional treatment strategies for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults. Cochr Database Syst Rev (Online). 2007, CD002938-Google Scholar
  4. Sheth P, Yu B, Laskowski ER, An KN: Ankle disk training influences reaction times of selected muscles in a simulated ankle sprain. Am J Sports Med. 1997, 25: 538-543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kannus P, Renström P: Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Operation, cast, or early controlled mobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1991, 73: 305-312.Google Scholar
  6. van Rijn RM, van Os AG, Bernsen RMD, Luijsterburg PA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA: What is the clinical course of acute ankle sprains? a systematic literature review. Am J Med. 2008, 121: 324-331. e326View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Palmieri-Smith RM, Hopkins JT, Brown TN: Peroneal activation deficits in persons with functional ankle instability. Am J Sports Med. 2009, 37: 982-988.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gribble PA, Hertel J: Effect of lower-extremity muscle fatigue on postural control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004, 85: 589-592.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitchell A, Dyson R, Hale T, Abraham C: Biomechanics of ankle instability. Part 1: reaction time to simulated ankle sprain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40: 1515-1521.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mckeon PO, Ingersoll CD, Kerrigan DC, Saliba E, Bennett BC, Hertel J: Balance training improves function and postural control in those with chronic ankle instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40: 1810-1819.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardy L, Huxel K, Brucker J, Nesser T: Prophylactic ankle braces and star excursion balance measures in healthy volunteers. J Athl Train. 2008, 43: 347-351.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Eechaute C, Vaes P, Duquet W: The dynamic postural control is impaired in patients with chronic ankle instability: reliability and validity of the multiple hop test. Clin J Sport Med Offic J Can Acad Sport Med. 2009, 19: 107-114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sesma AR, Mattacola CG, Uhl TL, Nitz AJ, Mckeon PO: Effect of foot orthotics on single- and double-limb dynamic balance tasks in patients with chronic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Spec. 2008, 1: 330-337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ross SE, Guskiewicz KM, Gross MT, Yu B: Balance measures for discriminating between functionally unstable and stable ankles. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009, 41: 399-407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sefton JM, Hicks-Little CA, Hubbard TJ, Clemens MG, Yengo CM, Koceja DM, Cordova ML: Sensorimotor function as a predictor of chronic ankle instability. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009, 24: 451-458.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tropp H, Odenrick P, Gillquist J: Stabilometry recordings in functional and mechanical instability of the ankle joint. Int J Sports Med. 1985, 6: 180-182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Becker HP, Rosenbaum D: Chronic recurrent ligament instability on the lateral ankle. Der Orthopäde. 1999, 28: 483-492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Verhagen RA, de Keizer G, van Dijk CN: Long-term follow-up of inversion trauma of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1995, 114: 92-96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Anandacoomarasamy A, Barnsley L: Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005, 39: e14-discussion e14View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Krips R, Brandsson S, Swensson C, van Dijk CN, Karlsson J: Anatomical reconstruction and evans tenodesis of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Clinical and radiological findings after follow-up for 15 to 30 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2002, 84: 232-236.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Horisberger M, Fung TS: Ligamentous posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2006, 34: 612-620.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pijnenburg AC, Van Dijk CN, Bossuyt PM, Marti RK: Treatment of ruptures of the lateral ankle ligaments: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2000, 82: 761-773.Google Scholar
  23. Kemler E, van de Port I, Backx F, van Dijk CN: A systematic review on the treatment of acute ankle sprain: brace versus other functional treatment types. Sports Med (Auckland, NZ). 2011, 41: 185-197.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. van Os AG, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Verhagen AP, de Bie RA, Luijsterburg PAJ, Koes BW: Comparison of conventional treatment and supervised rehabilitation for treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains: a systematic review of the literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005, 35: 95-105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. van Rijn RM, van Ochten J, Luijsterburg PAJ, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA: Effectiveness of additional supervised exercises compared with conventional treatment alone in patients with acute lateral ankle sprains: systematic review. BMJ. 2010, 341: c5688-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Rittweger J, Ehrig J, Just K, Kirsch MMA, Felsenberg D: Oxygen uptake in whole-body vibration exercise: influence of vibration frequency, amplitude, and external load. Int J Sports Med. 2002, 23: 428-432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rittweger J, Mutschelknauss M, Felsenberg D: Acute changes in neuromuscular excitability after exhaustive whole body vibration exercise as compared to exhaustion by squatting exercise. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2003, 23: 81-86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kvorning T, Bagger M, Caserotti P, Madsen K: Effects of vibration and resistance training on neuromuscular and hormonal measures. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006, 96: 615-625.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cheung W-H, Mok H-W, Qin L, Sze P-C, Lee K-M, Leung K-S: High-frequency whole-body vibration improves balancing ability in elderly women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007, 88: 852-857.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Torvinen S, Kannus P, Sievänen H, Järvinen TAH, Pasanen M, Kontulainen S, Nenonen A, Järvinen TLN, Paakkala T, Järvinen M, Vuori I: Effect of 8-month vertical whole body vibration on bone, muscle performance, and body balance: a randomized controlled study. J Bone Miner Res. 2003, 18: 876-884.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Delecluse C, Roelants M, Verschueren S: Strength increase after whole-body vibration compared with resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003, 35: 1033-1041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Cochrane DJ, Stannard SR: Acute whole body vibration training increases vertical jump and flexibility performance in elite female field hockey players. Br J Sports Med. 2005, 39: 860-865.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Verschueren SMP, Roelants M, Delecluse C, Swinnen S, Vanderschueren D, Boonen S: Effect of 6-month whole body vibration training on hip density, muscle strength, and postural control in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Bone Miner Res. 2004, 19: 352-359.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bogaerts A, Verschueren S, Delecluse C, Claessens AL, Boonen S: Effects of whole body vibration training on postural control in older individuals: a 1 year randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2007, 26: 309-316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rees SS, Murphy AJ, Watsford ML: Effects of whole body vibration on postural steadiness in an older population. J Sci Med Sport. 2009, 12: 440-444.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cardinale M, Bosco C: The use of vibration as an exercise intervention. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2003, 31: 3-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Armstrong WJ, Nestle HN, Grinnell DC, Cole LD, Van Gilder EL, Warren GS, Capizzi EA: The acute effect of whole-body vibration on the hoffmann reflex. J Strength Condit Res Nat Strength Condit Assoc. 2008, 22: 471-476.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Lau RW, Liao L-R, Yu F, Teo T, Chung RC, Pang MY: The effects of whole body vibration therapy on bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2011, 25: 975-988.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Torvinen S, Sievänen H, Järvinen TA, Pasanen M, Kontulainen S, Kannus P: Effect of 4-min vertical whole body vibration on muscle performance and body balance: a randomized cross-over study. Int J Sports Med. 2002, 23: 374-379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Cochrane DJ, Legg SJ, Hooker MJ: The short-term effect of whole-body vibration training on vertical jump, sprint, and agility performance. J Strength Condit Res Nat Strength Condit Assoc. 2004, 18: 828-832.Google Scholar
  41. Rittweger J, Just K, Kautzsch K, Reeg P, Felsenberg D: Treatment of chronic lower back pain with lumbar extension and whole-body vibration exercise: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2002, 27: 1829-1834.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Cardinale M, Lim J: Electromyography activity of vastus lateralis muscle during whole-body vibrations of different frequencies. J Strength Condit Res Nat Strength Condit Assoc. 2003, 17: 621-624.Google Scholar
  43. Delecluse C, Roelants M, Diels R, Koninckx E, Verschueren S: Effects of whole body vibration training on muscle strength and sprint performance in sprint-trained athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2005, 26: 662-668.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pollock RD, Woledge RC, Mills KR, Martin FC, Newham DJ: Muscle activity and acceleration during whole body vibration: effect of frequency and amplitude. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010, 25: 840-846.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Pollock RD, Provan S, Martin FC, Newham DJ: The effects of whole body vibration on balance, joint position sense and cutaneous sensation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011, 111: 3069-3077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ferran NA, Maffulli N: Epidemiology of sprains of the lateral ankle ligament complex. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006, 11: 659-662.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Clanton TO, Porter DA: Primary care of foot and ankle injuries in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 1997, 16: 435-466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Chorley JN, Hergenroeder AC: Management of ankle sprains. Pediatr Ann. 1997, 26: 56-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Cloak R, Nevill AM, Clarke F, Day S, Wyon MA: Vibration training improves balance in unstable ankles. Int J Sports Med. 2010, 31: 894-900.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C: CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010, 340: c332-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Polzer H, Kanz KG, Prall WC, Haasters F, Ockert B, Mutschler W, Grote S: Diagnosis and treatment of acute ankle injuries: development of an evidence-based algorithm. Orthop Rev. 2012, 4: e5-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Wees PV, Lenssen AF, Feijts YAEJ, Bloo H, van Morsel SR, Ouderland R, Opraus KWF, Rondhuis G, Simons A, Swinkels RAHM: KNGF guideline for physical therapy in patients with acute ankle sprain - practice guidelines. Suppl Dutch J Phys Ther. 2006, 116: 1-30.Google Scholar
  53. Oostendorp R: Functionele instabiliteit na het inversietrauma van enkel en voet: een effectonderzoek zleisterbandage versus pleisterbandage zecombineerd met fysiotherapie. [Functional instability after ankle sprains; a trial of taping versus taping and exercise]. Geneeskd Sport. 1987, 20: 45-55.Google Scholar
  54. Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Swärd L: Early functional treatment for acute ligament injuries of the ankle joint. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1996, 6: 341-345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Bassett SF, Prapavessis H: Home-based physical therapy intervention with adherence-enhancing strategies versus clinic-based management for patients with ankle sprains. Phys Ther. 2007, 87: 1132-1143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. van Rijn RM, van Os AG, Kleinrensink G-J, Bernsen RM, Verhaar JA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM: Supervised exercises for adults with acute lateral ankle sprain: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2007, 57: 793-800.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Holme E, Magnusson SP, Becher K, Bieler T, Aagaard P, Kjaer M: The effect of supervised rehabilitation on strength, postural sway, position sense and re-injury risk after acute ankle ligament sprain. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999, 9: 104-109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sekir U, Yildiz Y, Hazneci B, Ors F, Aydin T: Effect of isokinetic training on strength, functionality and proprioception in athletes with functional ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007, 15: 654-664.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mckeon PO, Hertel J: Systematic review of postural control and lateral ankle instability, part II: is balance training clinically effective?. J Athl Train. 2008, 43: 305-315.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Martin RL, Burdett RG, Irrgang JJ: Development of the foot and ankle disability index (FADI) [abstract]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999, 29: A32-A33.Google Scholar
  61. de Ruiter CJ, van der Linden RM, van der Zijden MJA, Hollander AP, de Haan A: Short-term effects of whole-body vibration on maximal voluntary isometric knee extensor force and rate of force rise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003, 88: 472-475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Jacobs PL, Burns P: Acute enhancement of lower-extremity dynamic strength and flexibility with whole-body vibration. J Strength Condit Res Nat Strength Condit Assoc. 2009, 23: 51-57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. van Dijk CN: On diagnostic strategies in patients with severe ankle sprain (thesis). 1994, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Univ of AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  64. van Dijk CN, Lim LS, Bossuyt PM, Marti RK: Physical examination is sufficient for the diagnosis of sprained ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1996, 78: 958-962.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Klenerman L: The management of sprained ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1998, 80: 11-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Struijs PAA, Marti RK, Blankevoort L, Assendelft WJJ, van Dijk CN: Functional treatments for acute ruptures of the lateral ankle ligament: a systematic review. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003, 74: 69-77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Lamb SE, Marsh JL, Hutton JL, Nakash R, Cooke MW, Group CASTC: Mechanical supports for acute, severe ankle sprain: a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009, 373: 575-581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Reinhard C, Tiedemann V: Propriorezeptives training bei distorsionen des OSG als beitrag zur sekundarprohylaxe und fr üheren wiedereingliederung. [Proprioreceptive training in ankle sprains can contribute to secondary prophylaxis and earlier reintegration]. Dtsch Z Sportmed. 1999, 50: 89-91.Google Scholar
  69. Rothermel S, Hale SA, Hertel J, Denegar CR: Effect of active foot positioning on the outcome of balance training program. Phys Ther Sport. 2004, 5: 98-103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Brown C, Ross S, Mynark R, Guskiewicz K: Assessing functional ankle instability with joint position sense, time to stabilization, and electromyography. J Sport Rehabil. 2004, 13: 122-134.Google Scholar
  71. Ross SE, Guskiewicz KM: Effect of coordination training with and without stochastic resonance stimulation on dynamic postural stability of subjects with functional ankle instability and subjects with stable ankles. Clin J Sport Med Offic J Can Acad Sport Med. 2006, 16: 323-328.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Wikstrom EA, Tillman MD, Chmielewski TL, Cauraugh JH, Naugle KE, Borsa PA: Dynamic postural control but not mechanical stability differs among those with and without chronic ankle instability. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010, 20: e137-e144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Santos MJ, Liu W: Possible factors related to functional ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008, 38: 150-157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Michell TB, Ross SE, Blackburn JT, Hirth CJ, Guskiewicz KM: Functional balance training, with or without exercise sandals, for subjects with stable or unstable ankles. J Athl Train. 2006, 41: 393-398.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Mckeon PO, Hertel J: Spatiotemporal postural control deficits are present in those with chronic ankle instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008, 9: 76-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Mitchell A, Dyson R, Hale T, Abraham C: Biomechanics of ankle instability. Part 2: postural sway-reaction time relationship. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40: 1522-1528.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Baumbach et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.