Skip to main content
Download PDF

Musculoskeletal symptoms and computer use among Finnish adolescents - pain intensity and inconvenience to everyday life: a cross-sectional study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 13, Article number: 41 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Musculoskeletal symptoms among adolescents are related to the time spent using a computer, but little is known about the seriousness of the symptoms or how much they affect everyday life. The purpose of the present study was to examine the intensity of musculoskeletal pain and level of inconvenience to everyday life, in relation to time spent using a computer.

Methods

In a survey, 436 school children (12 to 13 and 15 to 16 years of age), answered a questionnaire on musculoskeletal and computer-associated musculoskeletal symptoms in neck-shoulder, low back, head, eyes, hands, and fingers or wrists. Pain intensity (computer-associated symptoms) and inconvenience to everyday life (musculoskeletal symptoms) were measured using a visual analogue scale. Based on the frequency and intensity, three categories were formed to classify pain at each anatomic site: none, mild, and moderate/severe. The association with time spent using the computer was analyzed by multinomial logistic regression.

Results

Moderate/severe pain intensity was most often reported in the neck-shoulders (21%); head (20%); and eyes (14%); and moderate/severe inconvenience to everyday life was most often reported due to head (29%), neck-shoulders (21%), and low back (16%) pain. Compared with those using the computer less than 3.6 hours/week, computer use of ≥ 14 hours/week, was associated with moderate/severe increase in computer-associated musculoskeletal pain at all anatomic sites (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9-4.4), and moderate/severe inconvenience to everyday life due to low back (OR = 2.5) and head (OR = 2.0) pain.

Conclusions

Musculoskeletal symptoms causing moderate/severe pain and inconvenience to everyday life are common among adolescent computer users. Daily computer use of 2 hours or more increases the risk for pain at most anatomic sites.

Peer Review reports

Background

Information and communication technology (ICT) has become an important part of the lives of adolescents, the majority of whom regularly use computers for surfing the Internet, chatting, and playing games. At the same time, the prevalence of neck-shoulder and low back pain has increased among adolescents [1]. Studies among adolescents confirm a connection between musculoskeletal symptoms and the use of ICT, especially computers. Headache [2–4], neck-shoulder pain and low back pain [4–7] are more common among computer users than non-users. The risk of developing musculoskeletal pain increases with an increase in the amount of time spent on the computer [5]. Moreover, computer users' agree that computer use causes these symptoms. The findings of several studies indicate that computer use induces pain and discomfort not only in the neck-shoulder and back regions, but also in the hands, fingers, wrists, eyes, and head [8–11]. Earlier studies focused mainly on examining the relationship between pain and computer use, but there is no information on the seriousness of these symptoms and how much these symptoms affect the everyday lives of adolescents.

When assessing children and adolescents, the visual analogue scale (VAS) [12] is often used to quantify the intensity of musculoskeletal pain [13–17]. Very little is known, however, about the intensity of pain due to computer use. Konijnenberg et al. [18] described and quantified impairment due to chronic pain from an unknown cause in a study with 149 children (mean age 11.8 years). They reported that children report impaired functioning in multiple domains of daily life due to musculoskeletal pain. Roth-Isigkeit et al. [19] investigated the prevalence and characteristics of pain (e.g. pain intensity) among 735 children and adolescents (aged 10-18 years). Girls reported pain that was significantly more severe than did boys, and half of the sample reported pain lasting longer than 3 months. Among young computer users, Breen et al. [20] investigated discomfort and posture while using computers in a small sample of 68 schoolchildren (mean age 9.5 years), finding that 16% of the children reported pain, mostly in the neck or back region, at the beginning and end of a computer session. Pain intensity increased during the session [20].

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the intensity of computer-associated musculoskeletal pain and the level of inconvenience to everyday life caused by musculoskeletal symptoms among adolescent computer users.

Methods

Subjects

This study was part of a longitudinal classroom study to evaluate the association between ICT use, physical and mental stress, and strain, and development in school-aged children. The sample size was 689 children from 7 schools in a major city in Finland (5 elementary and 2 middle schools) in 2004. The follow-up survey in 2006 was performed in the same schools and classes as the baseline survey. In the present cross-sectional study, 436 respondents participated including 6th graders aged 12 to 13 years (n = 164, 37.6%) and 9th graders aged 15 to 16 years (n = 272, 62.4%). More than half of the participants (53.7%) were girls.

Instruments

Computer use was measured based on the response to the following open question: "How many hours per week do you usually use a computer?" The responses were categorized according to the sample distribution into three groups as follows: (i) 3.5 hours or less per week (corresponding ≤1/2 hour/day, N = 105); (ii) 3.6-13.99 hours per week (corresponding < 2 hours/day, N = 164); and (iii) 14 hours or more per week (corresponding ≥2 hours/day, N = 148). Those who did not use computers at all (N = 19) were excluded from the analysis.

The questionnaire included questions about two kinds of pain: musculoskeletal pain and computer-associated musculoskeletal pain. The latter question assessed the participants' own perception whether computer use had caused pain to them. Musculoskeletal pain was assessed with the question: "During the past half year, have you had some of the following symptoms and how often?" After the question six symptoms were mentioned (neck-shoulder, low back, head, eyes, hands, and fingers or wrists) and for each of them the following alternatives were given: a) seldom or not at all, b) about once a month, c) about once a week, and d) almost daily. Participants were asked to evaluate the level of inconvenience to everyday life due to pain using the VAS [12]. The 100-mm vertical VAS scale was marked at one end as "not inconvenient at all" and at the other end as "very inconvenient indeed". The level of the inconvenience caused by pain was assessed using the following question: "If you have musculoskeletal symptoms, how much inconvenience do they cause you in your everyday life?" The respondents were asked to make a mark on the line to indicate the level of inconvenience at the pain sites. The means for inconvenience were: head 20.7 mm (range 0-90 mm); neck or shoulders 16.1 (0-91) mm; low back 12.7 (0-76) mm; eyes 7.6 (0-77) mm; and hands, fingers and/or wrists 6.7 (0-68) mm.

Computer-associated musculoskeletal pain was assessed with the question: "Using a computer may cause symptoms (pain, aches, discomfort) in the following anatomic locations in the body. Have you experienced such symptoms?" The symptoms in neck-shoulder, low back, head, eyes, hands, and fingers or wrists, were named with the response alternatives a) not at all, b) about once a month, c) about once a week, and d) almost daily. Participants were asked to evaluate the pain intensity on the VAS-scale by the question: "If you have had computer-associated symptoms, how severe have they been?", and to make a mark on the line to indicate the intensity of each symptom. Here the endpoints were "no pain at all" and "very severe pain". The means of pain intensity were: head 15.3 mm (range 0-99 mm); neck or shoulders 15.1 (0-88) mm; eyes 10.0 (0-100) mm; low back 10.0 (0-85) mm; and hands, fingers, and/or wrists 5.3 (0-71) mm.

The VAS scores for pain intensity and level of inconvenience were each stratified into 4 groups. For pain intensity, VAS scores less than 5 mm were recorded as 0 (no pain), according to Hunfeld et al., who consider only a score of 5 mm or above to indicate the presence of pain [15, 21, 22]. For pain intensity and level of inconvenience symptom groups, scores of 51 mm or more were considered to indicate severe pain or severe inconvenience to everyday life; 26 to 50 mm indicated moderate pain or moderate inconvenience to everyday life; and 5 to 25 mm indicated mild pain or mild inconvenience to everyday life, respectively. Because of the small number of cases with severe pain and severe inconvenience to everyday life, the categories "severe" and "moderate" were combined into one variable "moderate/severe pain" and "moderate/severe inconvenience to everyday life".

New variables were formed by combining groups according to pain occurrence and pain intensity or level of inconvenience, as follows: "intensity of computer-associated pain" for computer-associated pain and their VAS categories, and "level of inconvenience to everyday life caused by musculoskeletal pain" for musculoskeletal pain and their VAS categories. These alternative groups were: a) seldom/no pain, no inconvenience to everyday life, b) mild pain, mild inconvenience to everyday life, and c) moderate/severe pain, moderate/severe inconvenience to everyday life. Those who reported having no or rare pain, but who evaluated their pain as mild, were classified as category b.

Procedure

The Ethics Committee of Pirkanmaa Hospital District approved the study (Code Nr. R04013). Permission was also obtained from the school principals. An information meeting was held separately at each school for each participating class, during which the purpose of the study was explained and an information letter was delivered both to the schoolchildren and their parents. Written consent to participate was obtained from all children and their parents/guardians. The participants completed questionnaires during school hours in the spring 2006, guided by the authors and research assistants.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows, version 15.0. In the multinomial logistic regression model, variables "intensity of computer-associated pain" and "level of inconvenience to everyday life caused by musculoskeletal pain" were outcome variables with three different categories. Time spent on the computer was a predictor variable, and sex and school grade (aged 12-13 and, 15-16 years) were considered potential confounders and treated as covariates. We calculated the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, and used P-values to show the differences between the age and sex groups. The statistical differences between the groups were tested using the chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Severe pain intensity and severe inconvenience to everyday life were reported most commonly for the head, neck-shoulders, and eyes, and least commonly for the hands, fingers, and/or wrists. The prevalence of moderate/severe pain was 20.7% for neck-shoulders, 19.7% for head, and 13.8% for eyes. The prevalence of moderate/severe inconvenience to everyday life was 28.3% due to head pain, 20.7% due to neck-shoulder pain, and 15.4% due to low back (Table 1). Pain intensity was reported as follows: girls reported more moderate/severe computer-associated pain than boys at all anatomic sites, except the low back, for which the prevalence was higher among the boys. Pain intensity in the neck-shoulders (p = 0.0001) and head (p = 0.0001) differed significantly between the sexes. Pain intensity at all anatomic sites increased with age, except in the eyes, for which the pain intensity decreased with age. The results were statistically significant in the neck-shoulders (p = 0.0001) and head (p = 0.0001) within age groups among both sexes. Level of inconvenience to everyday life was reported as follows: girls reported more moderate/severe inconvenience to everyday life caused by musculoskeletal pain than boys; head (p = 0.0001), neck-shoulders (p = 0.0001), and low back (p = 0.034) were the most prevalent sites for pain causing moderate/severe inconvenience. The 9th grade pupils reported moderate/severe inconvenience to everyday life more often than the 6th graders, and the results were statistically significant for head (p = 0.011), neck-shoulders (p = 0.0001), and low back (p = 0.0001) pain (data not shown).

Table 1 Level of inconvenience to everyday life caused by musculoskeletal pain, and intensity of computer-associated musculoskeletal pain, by sex and grade (%)
Full size table

A third (35.4%) of the respondents reported that they spend 14 or more hours a week using computers. Boys used computers more often than girls (p = 0.0001); half of the boys (50%, N = 98) and almost a quarter of the girls (23%, N = 51) used computers for 14 hours or more per week, which corresponds to 2 hours or more of daily use. The time spent using computers increased with age (p = 0.0001) among both sexes.

In the multinomial regression analysis, moderate/severe computer-associated musculoskeletal pain was significantly related to all anatomic sites when computer use was 14 hours or more hours/week. Moderate/severe pain in the neck-shoulders and head were statistically significantly related to computer use 3.6 to 13.99 hours/week. Moderate/severe inconvenience to everyday life due to musculoskeletal pain in the lower back and head was significantly related to computer use of 14 or more hours/week; and head pain was significantly related to computer use of 3.6 to 13.99 hours/week (Table 2).

Table 2 Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (Cl) for multivariate associations between computer use/week and level of inconvenience to everyday life caused by musculoskeletal pain, and intensity of computer-associated musculoskeletal pain.
Full size table

Mild pain in the lower back, head, and eyes was significantly related to computer use of 14 or more hours/week and 3.6 to 13.99 hours/week. Mild inconvenience to everyday life was significantly associated with pain in the low back and eyes when computer use was 14 or more hours per week (Table 2).

Discussion

The responses to two independent questions indicated that adolescents experience a low level of musculoskeletal pain with little effect on everyday life. On the other hand, our findings indicate that computer use of 14 or more hours/week (corresponding ≥ 2 hours/day) is related to moderate/severe computer-associated pain at all measured anatomic sites. Moreover, computer use of 14 or more hours/week was related to moderate/severe pain in the lower back and head, which affected the everyday lives of adolescents. Girls reported greater pain intensity and more inconvenience to everyday life due to pain at all anatomic sites than boys, and the prevalence rates increased with age.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate pain intensity and level of perceived negative impact on everyday life related to computer use in adolescents. Our results suggest that computer use of 14 or more hours/week (estimated ≥ 2 hours/day) is related to severe or moderate pain. Computer use exceeding 2 hours/day is suggested to be a threshold for neck-shoulder pain [5] neck-shoulder pain is associated with 1 or more hours/day spent on the computer [11, 23].

In our study, the pain intensity was lower than that reported in some previous studies [18, 19, 24], but approximately the same level as in the Finnish follow-up study by Saarni et al. with 88 participants [17]. Our results confirm earlier findings, that girls report more severe pain than do boys [18, 19].

In the present study, the intensity of pain and inconvenience to everyday life were measured using the well-documented visual analogue scale, VAS. The VAS has been extensively studied and has shown good acceptability, responsivity, and validity for most children aged 8 years and older [25]. Before analysis of the data, pain intensity categories were defined based on the findings of Collins et al. [26]. Musculoskeletal symptoms in five anatomical locations were evaluated by two independent questions. These anatomical sites had been related to computer use in previous studies. The first question measured musculoskeletal symptoms in general with no reference to computer use. The second one measured musculoskeletal pain that children themselves attributed to their computer use. Using two different questions gives a more reliable picture and a wider perspective to the association between musculoskeletal symptoms and computer use. The questions and their VAS categories were stated in different sections of the questionnaire; computer-associated pain was stated in the ICT-section and musculoskeletal pain in the section concerning health status.

There are some limitations to the present study. The convenience sample of the present study does not necessarily represent the entire population of that age, although it is unlikely that this would influence the studied relationships. Due to the cross-sectional design of the study, we are restricted to investigating the contemporary relations in our data, and thus causal inferences cannot be made based on this study alone. As the questions used in the study measured the respondents' perception of the intensity of computer-associated pain, it was a subjective measure. Thus it was left to the respondents to report whether these symptoms were due specifically to computer use. Being a questionnaire survey, the rate of occurrence of computer -associated and musculoskeletal symptoms, the pain intensity and inconvenience to everyday life were based on self-reports, and therefore memory bias is possible and differences between individuals' interpretations cannot be ruled out [27]. Respondents reported the weekly duration of computer use in response to an open question. There may be misreporting and overestimation of the duration of adolescents' computer use especially if there are different procedures to measure computer time [10]. In adults, the use of self-reports can lead to the misclassification of computer exposure for more than 80% of respondents [28]. In a previous study of adults self-reported duration of computer use but not recorded computer exposure, was positively associated with upper extremity symptoms [29]. A study using a computer-based program showed that the use of a computer mouse predicted acute neck-shoulder pain, but not chronic neck-shoulder pain [30]. Overall, based on an overview of systematic reviews, computer work has been associated with upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms, but the causal relationship between computer work and symptoms shows a more mixed level of evidence [31]. We also do not know either if the mechanisms by which computer use elicits pain differ between adults and adolescents. Future studies with longitudinal designs are needed to examine the persistence of musculoskeletal symptoms, with accurate measurements of computer use and to evaluate the changes between symptoms and computer use.

Conclusion

The findings of the present study suggest that musculoskeletal symptoms causing moderate and severe pain as well as inconvenience to everyday life are common among adolescent computer users. Daily computer use of 2 hours or more increases the risk at most anatomic sites.

References

  1. Hakala P, Rimpelä A, Salminen JJ, Virtanen SM, Rimpelä M: Back, neck, and shoulder pain in Finnish adolescents: national cross sectional surveys. Br Med J. 2002, 325: 743-745. 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander LM, Currie C: Young people's computer use: implications for health education. Health Educ. 2004, 4: 254-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oksanen A, Metsähonkala L, Anttila P, Aromaa M, Jäppilä E, Viander S, Salminen J, Helenius H, Sillanpää M: Leisure activities in adolescents with headache. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94: 609-615. 10.1080/08035250410023331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Torsheim T, Eriksson L, Schnohr CH, Hansen F, Bjarnason T, Välimaa R: Screen-based activities and physical complaints among adolescents from the Nordic countries. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 324-Accessed June 9, 2010, [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/324]

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hakala PT, Rimpelä AH, Saarni LA, Salminen JJ: Frequent computer-related activities increase the risk of neck-shoulder and low back pain in adolescents. Eur J Public Health. 2006, 16: 536-541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zapata AL, Moraes AJP, Leone C, Doria-Filho U, Silva CAA: Pain and musculoskeletal pain syndromes related to computer and video game use in adolescents. Eur J Pediatr. 2006, 165: 408-414. 10.1007/s00431-005-0018-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith L, Louw Q, Crous L, Grimmer-Somers K: Prevalence of neck pain and headaches: impact of computer use and other associative factors. Cephalalgia. 2008, 29: 250-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burke A, Peper E: Cumulative trauma disorder risk for children using computer products: Results of a pilot investigation with a student convenience sample. Public Health Rep. 2002, 117: 350-357. 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50171-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Szeto GPY, Lau JCC, Siu AYK, Tang MY, Tang TWY, Yiu AOY: A study of physical discomfort associated with computer use in secondary school student. Proc CybErg 2002, [http://cyberg.wits.ac.za/]

  10. Palm P, Hansson Risberg E, Mortimer M, Palmerud G, Toomingas A, Wigaeus Tornqvist E: Computer use, neck and upper-extremity symptoms, eyestrain and headache among female and male upper secondary school students. Scand J Work Environ Health Suppl. 2007, 3: 33-41.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hakala PT, Saarni LA, Ketola RL, Rahkola ET, Salminen JJ, Rimpelä AT: Computer-associated health complaints and sources of ergonomic instructions in computer-related issues among Finnish adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 11-10.1186/1471-2458-10-11. Accessed January 11, 2010, [http://biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/11]

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MIJ: The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976, 31: 1191-1198. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perquin CW, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AAJM, Hunfeld JAM, Bohnen AM, van Suijlekom-Smith LW, Passchier J, van der Wouden JC: Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience. Pain. 2000, 87: 51-58. 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00269-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bandell-Hoekstra IENG, Huijer Abu-Saad H, Passchier J, Frederics CMA, Feron FMJ, Knipschild P: Prevalence and characteristics of headache in Dutch schoolchildren. Eur J Pain. 2001, 5: 145-153. 10.1053/eujp.2001.0234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunfeld JAM, Perquin CW, Bertina W, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AAJM, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA, Koes BW, van der Wouden JC, Passchier J: Stability of pain parameters and pain-related quality of life in adolescents with persistent pain: A three-year follow-up. Clin J Pain. 2002, 18: 99-106. 10.1097/00002508-200203000-00005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guite JW, Logan DE, Sherry DD, Rose JB: Adolescent Self-Perception: Associations with chronic musculoskeletal pain and functional disability. J Pain. 2007, 8: 379-386. 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.10.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saarni LA, Rimpelä AH, Nummi TH, Kaukiainen A, Salminen JJ, Nygård C-H: Do ergonomically designed school workstations decrease musculoskeletal symptoms in children? A 26-month prospective follow-up study. Appl Erg. 2009, 40: 491-499. 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Konijnenberg AY, Uiterwaal CSPM, Kimpen JLL, van der Hoeven J, Buitelaar JK, de Graeff-Meeder ER: Children with unexplained chronic pain: substantial impairment in everyday life. Arch Dis Child. 2005, 90: 680-686. 10.1136/adc.2004.056820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Roth-Isigkeit A, Thyen U, Raspe HH, Stöven H, Schmucker P: Reports of pain among German children and adolescents: an epidemiological study. Acta Paediatr. 2004, 93: 258-263. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb00717.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Breen R, Pyper S, Rusk Y, Dockrell S: An investigation of children's posture and discomfort during computer use. Ergonomics. 2007, 50: 1582-1592. 10.1080/00140130701584944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunfeld JAM, van der Wouden JC, den Deurwaarder ESG, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AJJM: Measuring chronic pain in children, an exploration. Percept Mot Skills. 1997, 84: 1176-1178. 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3c.1176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hunfeld JAM, Passchier J, Perquin CW, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AAJM, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA, van der Wouden JC: Quality of life in adolescents with chronic pain in the head or at other locations. Cephalalgia. 2001, 21: 201-206. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2001.00187.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith L, Louw Q, Crous L, Grimmer-Somers K: Prevalence of neck pain and headaches: impact of computer use and other associative factors. Cephalalgia. 2008, 29: 250-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Astfalck RG, O'Sullivan PB, Straker LM, Smith AJ: A detailed characterization of pain, disability, physical and psychological features of a small group of adolescents with non-specific chronic low back pain. Man Ther. 2010, 15: 240-247. 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B: Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain. 2006, 125: 143-157. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ: The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimeters?. Pain. 1997, 72: 95-97. 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00005-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eich E, Reeves JL, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford SB: Memory for pain: Relation between past and present pain intensity. Pain. 1985, 23: 375-379. 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90007-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. IJmker S, Leijssen JNM, Blatter BM, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM: Test-retest reliability and validity of self-reported duration of computer use at work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008, 34: 113-119. 10.5271/sjweh.1220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. IJmker S, Huysmans MA, van der Beek AJ, Knol DL, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Blatter BM: Software-recorded and self-reported duration of computer use in relation to the onset of severe arm-wrist-hand pain and neck-shoulder pain. Occup Environ Med. 2011, 68: 502-509. 10.1136/oem.2010.056267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen JH, Harhoff M, Grimstrup S, Vilstrup I, Lassen CF, Brandt LP, Kryger AI, Overgaard E, Hansen KD, Mikkelsen S: Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder. Occup Environ Med. 2008, 65: 126-131. 10.1136/oem.2007.033506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Andersen JH, Fallentin N, Thomsen JF, Mikkelsen S: Risk factors for neck and upper extremity disorders among computers users and the effect of interventions: An overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (5): e19691-10.1371/journal.pone.0019691.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Lasse Pere for data management and SciTechEdit International for revising the language. This study was supported by the grant from the Academy of Finland; the Information Society Institute of the University of Tampere and the Tampere University of Technology; the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Health Promotion Research Programme of the Academy of Finland; Competitive Research Funding of Pirkanmaa Hospital District; and the Vaasa University of Applied Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, FIN-33014, Finland

    Paula T Hakala, Clas-Håkan Nygård & Arja H Rimpelä

  2. Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, FIN-33421, Tampere, Finland

    Paula T Hakala

  3. Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Kuntokatu 3, 33520, Tampere, Finland

    Lea A Saarni

  4. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tampere, FIN-33014, Finland

    Raija-Leena Punamäki & Marjut A Wallenius

  5. Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014, Finland

    Raija-Leena Punamäki

Authors
  1. Paula T Hakala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lea A Saarni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raija-Leena Punamäki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marjut A Wallenius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Clas-Håkan Nygård
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Arja H Rimpelä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula T Hakala.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AHR, R-LP, MAW, and C-HN initiated and designed the study, and LAS provided critical input in all phases. PTH and AHR performed the main analysis, drafted the paper, and coordinated subsequent revisions with the other authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakala, P.T., Saarni, L.A., Punamäki, RL. et al. Musculoskeletal symptoms and computer use among Finnish adolescents - pain intensity and inconvenience to everyday life: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13, 41 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-41

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-41

Keywords

  • Visual Analogue Scale
  • Everyday Life
  • Pain Intensity
  • Visual Analogue Scale Score
  • Anatomic Site

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us