Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sonographic evaluation of the shoulder in asymptomatic elderly subjects with diabetes

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201011:278

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-278

Received: 27 July 2010

Accepted: 7 December 2010

Published: 7 December 2010

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of rotator cuff tears increases with age and several studies have shown that diabetes is associated with symptomatic shoulder pathologies. Aim of our research was to evaluate the prevalence of shoulder lesions in a population of asymptomatic elderly subjects, normal and with non insulin - dependent diabetes mellitus.

Methods

The study was performed on 48 subjects with diabetes and 32 controls (mean age: 71.5 ± 4.8 and 70.7 ± 4.5, respectively), who did not complain shoulder pain or dysfunction. An ultrasound examination was performed on both shoulders according to a standard protocol, utilizing multiplanar scans.

Results

Tendons thickness was greater in diabetics than in controls (Supraspinatus Tendon: 6.2 ± 0.09 mm vs 5.2 ± 0.7 mm, p < 0.001; Biceps Tendon: 4 ± 0.8 mm vs 3.2 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.001). Sonographic appearances of degenerative features in the rotator cuff and biceps were more frequently observed in diabetics (Supraspinatus Tendon: 42.7% vs 20.3%, p < 0.003; Biceps Tendon: 27% vs 7.8%, p < 0.002).

Subjects with diabetes exhibited more tears in the Supraspinatus Tendon (Minor tears: 15 (15.8%) vs 2 (3.1%), p < 0.03; Major tears: 15 (15.8%) vs 5 (7.8%), p = ns), but not in the long head of Biceps. More effusions in subacromial bursa were observed in diabetics (23.9% vs 10.9%, p < 0.03) as well as tenosynovitis in biceps tendon (33.3% vs 10.9%, p < 0.001).

In both groups, pathological findings were prevalent on the dominant side, but no difference related to duration of diabetes was found.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that age - related rotator cuff tendon degenerative changes are more common in diabetics.

Ultrasound is an useful tool for discovering in pre - symptomatic stages the subjects that may undergo shoulder symptomatic pathologies.

Background

Several sonographic studies, performed in the general population, show that the prevalence of rotator cuff tears increases with age. The prevalence of tears ranges widely, roughly from 0 - 15% in the 60 s to 30 - 50% in 80 s, these differences being explained by characteristics of subjects enrolled and sonographic criteria by which lesions were identified [19].

Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a more sensitive methodology than ultrasound (US) in detecting pathological changes in asymptomatic shoulders. However, its use for epidemiological purposes is limited by higher costs and lower availability [10, 11].

Moreover, it is well known that diabetes is a strong risk factor for rotator cuff pathologies, as shown by studies performed in symptomatic subjects [1222]. In addition, after a surgical repair, diabetics show a restricted shoulder range of motion [23]and a higher incidence in re - tears[24].

However, to our knowledge, there are no studies, which evaluated asymptomatic elderly subjects with diabetes. Therefore, it could be of interest to investigate whether diabetes has an additive effect on age - related tendon degeneration and whether US evaluation of the shoulder in pre - symptomatic stage could be a useful tool for discovering subjects at risk.

In addition, it must be considered that the majority of sonographic studies has been focused on supraspinatus tendon tears [1, 2, 59], whereas less attention has been paid to other tendons of rotator cuff and anatomical structures of the shoulder [3, 25].

Therefore, aim of this study was twofold: first, to evaluate the prevalence of sonographic shoulder lesions in asymptomatic elderly subjects, normal and diabetics; second, to describe, beside supraspinatus tears, other abnormalities of anatomical structures of clinical interest which could occur in these subjects.

Methods

Subjects

All the subjects enrolled in the study were recruited from the Outpatients Service of the Medicine and Science of Aging Department of Chieti - Pescara University.

Inclusion criteria were the following: 1) living independently in the community; 2) age > 65 years; 3) right - handedness; 4) absence of pain or acceptable discomfort in the shoulder joint, spontaneous or during usual activities of daily living; 5) no subjective dysfunction; 6) no history of trauma or surgery of the shoulder joint.

Patients with rheumatic disorders, endocrinopathies, malignancies and systemic diseases (renal, hepatic, cardiac, etc.), treated with steroids or NSAID, were excluded.

The local Ethics Committee approved the study design and informed written consent was obtained from all the patients.

The study group included 48 subjects with non insulin - dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The diagnosis of NIDDM was based on American Diabetes Association criteria [26].

The control group was made by 32 subjects, matched for age and sex, but without NIDDM, and selected with the same inclusion/exclusion criteria.

The age of onset of diabetes, current therapies and comorbidities were registered.

Hypertension was diagnosed when the subjects were taking antihypertensive drugs, Coronary Arterial Disease when they suffered from angina or myocardial infarction and Peripheral Arterial Disease when Ankle Brachial Index was less than 0.90 mmHg.

Subjects were also classified according their previous working activities, sports and hobbies. Home and office work was considered as light work; farm, factory and building industry work was considered heavy work.

Ultrasound evaluation

US examination was performed by the same operator (AM), by means of a multi - frequency (5 - 14 MHz) linear array probe. The examiner was not blinded to the clinical status of the subjects.

Both shoulders were evaluated, according to a standard protocol, previously described by Papatheodorou et al. [27].

The following tendons were evaluated: Supraspinatus (SST), Infraspinatus (IST), Subscapularis (SBT) and long head of the Biceps (BT). In addition, the subacromial - subdeltoid (SAD) bursa was studied.

Maximal SST thickness was measured on a longitudinal view, just in front of the lateral part of the humeral head [27]; the thickness of the long head of BT was measured into the bicipital groove [28].

The presence of dishomogeneous hypo- or hyperechoic thicknening, diffuse or focal, of the tendon, associated with loss of the normal fibrillar pattern and/or irregularity of the tendon margins, was interpreted as sign of degeneration.

In addition, but only in BT, which is provided of a synovial sheat, the appearance of an anechoic area around the tendon, associated or not with synovial proliferation, was considered as a sign of tenosynovitis [29].

SST, IST and SBT tears were classified as follows:
  1. 1)

    Partial thickness tear: focal hypoechoic discontinuity with irregular margins at the bursal or articular side or located intratendinously. A bursal - side tear produces flattening of the bursal surface, with loss of the superior convexity of the tendon, while an articular - side tear appears as a distinct hypoechoic or mixed hyper - hypoechoic defect of the articular surface, abutting the articular cartilage [27].

     
  2. 2)

    Full thickness tear: full defect in the tendon from the bursal to the articular margin. Hypoechoic fluid may fill the tear, with loss of the normal outward convexity of the tendon at this site. Moreover, owing to the pressure applied with the transducer, the deltoid muscle can abut against the humeral head [27].

     

Taken into consideration the distance between the ends of the tendon, tears were divided in small ( < 1 cm), large (more than 1 but less than 3 cm) or massive (> 3 cm).

For simplicity sake, we considered a) Minor tears ( including partial thickness tears and small full thickness ruptures) and b) Major tears (including large full thickness tears and massive ruptures).

For BT, a partial tear was reported as a focal hypoechoic discontinuity, with irregular borders, located intratendinously, while the non visualization of the tendon into the bicipital groove, with associated bulbous appearance of the biceps muscle, was reported as complete tear [27].

Involvement of SAD was identified when accumulation of anechoic fluid, with or without hypoechoic swelling of the synovia, appeared within it; it was graded subjectively as normal (distension < 1 mm), slightly increased (1 - 2 mm) or clearly increased (> 2 mm).

Data analysis

Data are reported as mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD) for continuous variables, whereas categorical and dichotomous variables are reported as frequencies and percentage. The tendon thickness and the percentage of US abnormalities found in the shoulders of diabetic subjects were compared with that observed in controls. Afterwards, the differences in tendon thickness between dominant and non - dominant side and according to diabetes duration were analyzed.

The significance level was determined at p < 0.05. The two - sample Student's t - test was used to compare continuous variables when the distribution of data was normal; the Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used otherwise. The χ 2 test was used to evaluate associations between categorical data.

All analyses were done using SAS statistical software, release 8.1.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of diabetic and control subjects are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Demography and associated diseases

 

Controls

Diabetics

p

Age

70.7 ± 4.5 (65 - 82)

71.5 ± 4.8 (65 - 84)

ns

M : F

20 : 12

30 : 18

ns

Previous working activity

   

   - Heavy work

10 (31.25%)

12 (25%)

Ns

   - Light work

22 (68.75%)

36 (75%)

ns

Hypertension

10 (31.2%)

29 (60.4%)

0.001

Coronary Heart Disease

6 (18.7%)

18 (37.5%)

0.007

Peripheral Artery Disease

5 (15.6%)

12 (25%)

ns

The subjects did not differ for age, sex and previous working activity. None of the subjects enrolled practised sports or had hobbies involving the use of shoulder joints. Cardiovascular complications (Hypertension, Coronary Heart Disease), as expected, were observed more frequently in diabetics.

The duration of diabetes was less than 10 years (mean 6.8 ± 1.9) in 34 subjects and more than 10 years (mean 14.7 ± 2.2 years) in 14. In all the participants, HbA1c levels were < 8.0 gr/dl.

SST and BT thickness was significantly greater in diabetics than in controls both in the dominant and non dominant side (Figure 1; Table 2).
Figure 1

Ultrasound appearance of normal and degenerated Supraspinatus Tendon. Panel a) Transverse scan: a normal fibrillar pattern and thickness of Supraspinatus Tendon is observed (between calipers). Panel b) Supraspinatus Tendon is thickened (calipers), hypoechoic, dishomogeneous, with loss of the normal fibrillar pattern. In this picture, an effusion in the subacromial bursa is present (*). 1) Supraspinatus tendon; 2) Biceps tendon; H) Humeral head; D) Deltoid muscle.

Table 2

Sonographic findings in diabetics and control subjects

 

DOMINANT SIDE

NON DOMINANT SIDE

BOTH SHOULDERS

 

Controls

Diabetics

p

Controls

Diabetics

p

Controls

Diabetics

p

SST

         

Thickness (mm)

5.2 ± 0.7

6.2 ± 0.9

0.001

4.7 ± 0.6

5.6 ± 0.6

0.08

   

Minor lesions

1 (3.1%)

10 (20.8%)

0.02

1 (3.1%)

5 (10.4%)

0.22

2 (3.1%)

15 (15.8%)

0.03

Major lesions

3 (9.3%)

10 (20.8%)

0.17

2 (6.2%)

5 (10.4%)

0.5

5 (7.8%)

15 (15.8%)

0.14

BT

         

Thickness (mm)

3.2 ± 0.4

4 ± 0.8

0.001

3 ± 0.4

3.4 ± 0.5

0.001

   

Minor lesions

1 (3.1%)

2 (4.1%)

0.06

1 (3.1%)

1 (2%)

0.09

2 (3.1%)

3 (3.1%)

0.00

Major lesions

1 (3.1%)

3 (6.2%)

0.39

1 (3.1%)

2 (4.1%)

0.06

2 (3.1%)

5 (5.1%)

0.37

Degeneration

         

Rotator cuff

7 (21.8%)

22 (45.8%)

0.02

6 (18.7%)

19 (39.5%)

0.04

13 (20.3%)

41 (42.7%)

0.003

BT

3 (9.3%)

17 (35.4%)

0.008

2 (6.2%)

9 (28.1%)

0.11

5 (7.8%)

26 (27.8%)

0.002

Effusion

         

SAD

4 (12.5%)

16 (33.3%)

0.03

3 (9.3%)

7 (14.5%)

0.4

7 (10.9%)

23 (23.9%)

0.03

BT

5 (15.6%)

21 (43.7%)

0.008

2 (6.2%)

11 (22.9%)

0.04

7 (10.9%)

32 (33.3%)

0.001

In both groups, tears of SST were more frequently observed (Figure 2). The percentage of both minor and major tears was higher in diabetics, but the difference was significant only for SST minor tears. Massive tears of SST were always associated with an involvement of IFT. No tears in the SBT were registered.
Figure 2

Supraspinatus Tendon tears. Panel a) Longitudinal scan: an intratendinous partial thickness tear is reported as focal hypoechoic discontinuity (calipers) with irregular margins. Panel b) Transverse scan: a full defect in the tendon from the bursal to the articular margin, filled with anechoic fluid, is observed (calipers). 1) Supraspinatus tendon; H) Humeral head; D) Deltoid muscle.

Subjects with diabetes duration more than 10 years exhibited more SST and BT tears, but the difference was not significant at statistical analysis: 1) SST: Minor tears 7/28 (25%) vs 8/68 (11.7%), p = 0.10; Major tears 6/28 (21.4%) vs 9/68 (13.2%), p = 0.31; 2) BT: Minor tears 1/28 (3.5%) vs 2/68 (2.9%), p = 0.87; Major tears 3/28 (10.7%) vs 2/68 (2.9%), p = 0.11).

The prevalence of degenerative abnormalities in rotator cuff tendons and BT was significantly higher in diabetics.

Tenosynovitis of the long head of the BT and SAD bursitis were more frequent in diabetics (Figure 3; Table 2).
Figure 3

Tenosynovitis of the Biceps tendon. Panel a) Biceps tendon into the bicipital groove (transverse scan): the fibrillar pattern and thickness are normal. Panel b) Fluid around the tendon (*) expands the synovial sheet (arrows) expression of tenosynovitis. A mild thickening of Biceps tendon is observed. 1) Biceps tendon; BG) Bicipital groove; D) Deltoid muscle.

Discussion

Several studies have shown that the prevalence of rotator cuff tendons tears is increased in elderly subjects, with or without shoulder pain or movement limitation [19]. Moreover, it is well known that patients with diabetes are at increased risk for shoulder pathologies, such as frozen shoulder or rotator cuff tears [1222]. In addition, after a surgical repair, diabetics show a restricted range of motion of the shoulder[23]and a higher incidence in re-tears. This observation can be related to the intrinsic poor quality of the tissue that is being repaired[24].

The results of our study suggest that, also in asymptomatic subjects, age - related rotator cuff tendon changes are more common in diabetics. This conclusion is supported by the observation of a higher prevalence of tears and of degenerative phenomena in diabetics, as well as by the increased thickness of supraspinatus and biceps tendons, which is due to the abnormal storage of collagen layers in the tissue and, therefore, is itself an expression of degenerative changes [20].

These observations are of clinical relevance, because it has been shown by Yamaguchi et al. [30, 31], in a 2.8 years follow - up study, that pain and limitation in functional ability can develop in a large percentage (50%) of people with asymptomatic tears at baseline.

Besides tendinopathic degenerative lesions, bursal and peritendinous effusions were observed, which could be an expression of early reactive inflammation to minimal tendon tears, following minor and unrecognized traumatic events [3236].

Another clinical observation coming from our study is the increased prevalence of pathological findings in the dominant side, that confirms the theory that overuse may have a significant pathogenetic role [9, 37, 38].

However, due to the difficulty of getting definite information about working - related lesions, we have not been able to differentiate work - related injuries versus intrinsic diabetes - induced changes in the rotator cuff.

No significant correlation was observed with the duration of diabetes. The lack of association may be explained by the difficulty in establishing the age of diabetes onset. Indeed, subjects could have glucose intolerance or mild NIDDM for a significant period of time before the clinical diagnosis of diabetes.

From the pathogenetic point of view, it is likely that, in individuals with no history of significant trauma, rotator cuff tears are mainly caused by intrinsic degenerative changes, related to aging, vascular factors or mechanical impingement [6, 34, 36, 39, 40].

The biochemical mechanisms of tendon degeneration are similar in ageing and diabetes.

The most important abnormality is the non - enzymatic glycosylation of collagen with advanced glycation end products (AGEs) formation [4143].

The spontaneous condensation of glucose and metabolic intermediates (e.g. triose phosphates, glyoxal and methylglyoxal) with free aminogroups in lysine, hydroxylysine or arginine leads to a covalent bond between the sugar and the aminoacid (the Amadori product), and subsequent reactions give rise to the formation of AGEs.

AGEs affect physical and chemical properties of proteins, increasing the amount of intermolecular collagen cross - links. This results in reduction of the solubility of collagen that gets tougher, stiffer and weaker, loses its elasticity and is more likely to tear [44].

Another mechanism, by which AGEs may exert noxious effects, is represented by their action on specific receptors (RAGE), which have been identified on the membrane of chondrocytes, tenocytes and fibroblasts [45, 46].

Ligand engagement of RAGE triggers cell - specific signalling, resulting in enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species, and in the activation of the transcription of nuclear factor NF - kB [47, 48]. This, in turn, accelerates AGEs cross - link formation in collagen fibers [49, 50] and leads to sustained upregulation of pro - inflammatory mediators, adhesion molecules and to a dysfunctional cell phenotype [48, 51, 52].

In diabetes RAGE, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Cytokines are overexpressed [5356] and it may explain why diabetics show increased prevalence of lesions and inflammatory reactions.

Beside the AGE - mediated pathogenetic mechanism, microvascular disease may lead to tissue hypoxia, resulting in production of oxygen free radicals, which, in turn, leads to overproduction of growth factors and cytokines [5759].

Some limitations of this study must be acknowledged. Pain and functional limitation were evaluated on a self report basis, which is highly subjective. Active and passive ranges of motion of the shoulder were not measured. As matter of fact, functional impairment or pain in the extreme degrees of movements could be present in these subjects, who were yet able in performing usual activities of daily living, but who could avoid, spontaneously or unconsciously, some disturbing tasks. Spurs or other bone abnormalities were not taken into account in this study, which was mainly aimed at tendon evaluation. Therefore, we cannot state whether individuals with diabetes had a higher prevalence of lesions that could be treated surgically to prevent impingement type tears. Moreover, the examiner was not blind to whether or not the individuals had diabetes or not.

Finally, it must be acknowledged that US investigation has limited reliability in detecting partial thickness tears and intra - articular tears of biceps tendon [7, 60, 61].

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that NIDDM worsen the tendon degeneration in aged subjects. US imaging, beside clinical evaluation, is an useful tool for discovering in pre - symptomatic stages the subjects at risk, who may undergo to shoulder pathologies. In these subjects, that represent a growing segment of elderly population, a careful metabolic control by means of diet and anti - diabetics drugs is recommended and the progression of tear size should be monitored over time.

List of abbreviations

NIDDM

Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

US

Ultrasound

SST

Supraspinatus

IST

Infraspinatus

SBT

Subscapularis

BT

Long head of the biceps tendon

SAD

Subacromial subdeltoid bursa

AGE

Advanced glycation end product

RAGE

Receptor advanced glycation end product

PGE2

Prostaglandin E2

NO

Nitric Oxide

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, Infrared Imaging Laboratory, Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), "University G. d' Annunzio" Chieti - Pescara
(2)
Echography Unit, Department of Medicine and Sciences of Aging, University "G. d' Annunzio" Chieti - Pescara
(3)
Department of Human Movement Science, University "G. d 'Annunzio" Chieti - Pescara

References

  1. Itoi E, Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Seki N, Abe H: Are pain location and physical examinations useful in locating a tear site of the rotator cuff?. Am J Sports Med. 2006, 34 (2): 256-264. 10.1177/0363546505280430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Milgrom C, Schaffler M, Gilbert S, van Holsbeeck M: Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults. The effect of age, hand dominance and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995, 77 (2): 296-298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Moosmayer S, Smith HJ, Tariq R, Larmo A: Prevalence and characteristics of asymptomatic tears of the rotator cuff: an ultrasonographic and clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009, 91 (2): 196-200. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Needell SD, Zlatkin MB, Sher JS, Murphy BJ, Uribe JW: MR imaging of the rotator cuff: peritendinous and bone abnormalities in an asymptomatic population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996, 166 (4): 863-867.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, Windley J, Emery RJ: Dead men and radiologists don't lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006, 88 (2): 116-121. 10.1308/003588406X94968.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Schibany N, Zehetgruber H, Kainberger F, Wurnig C, Ba-Ssalamah A, Herneth AM, Lang T, Gruber D, Breitenseher MJ: Rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic individuals: a clinical and ultrasonographic screening study. Eur J Radiol. 2004, 51 (3): 263-268. 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00159-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K: Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000, 82 (4): 498-504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R: Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999, 8 (4): 296-299. 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90148-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, Yanagawa T, Nakajima D, Shitara H, Kobayashi T: Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010, 19 (1): 116-120. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sipola P, Niemitukia L, Kröger H, Höfling I, Väätäinen U: Detection and Quantification of Rotator Cuff Tears with Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging - A Prospective Study in 77 Consecutive Patients with a Surgical Reference. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010,Google Scholar
  11. Naqvi GA, Jadaan M, Harrington P: Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2009, 3 (4): 94-7. 10.4103/0973-6042.63218.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Arkkila PE, Kantola IM, Viikari JS, Ronnemaa T: Shoulder capsulitis in type I and II diabetic patients: association with diabetic complications and related diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996, 55 (12): 907-914. 10.1136/ard.55.12.907.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Aydeniz A, Gursoy S, Guney E: Which musculoskeletal complications are most frequently seen in type 2 diabetes mellitus?. J Int Med Res. 2008, 36 (3): 505-511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Balci N, Balci MK, Tuzuner S: Shoulder adhesive capsulitis and shoulder range of motion in type II diabetes mellitus: association with diabetic complications. J Diabetes Complications. 1999, 13 (3): 135-140. 10.1016/S1056-8727(99)00037-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cagliero E, Apruzzese W, Perlmutter GS, Nathan DM: Musculoskeletal disorders of the hand and shoulder in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2002, 112 (6): 487-490. 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01045-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole A, Gill TK, Shanahan EM, Phillips P, Taylor AW, Hill CL: Is diabetes associated with shoulder pain or stiffness? Results from a population based study. J Rheumatol. 2009, 36 (2): 371-377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mavrikakis ME, Sfikakis PP, Kontoyannis SA, Antoniades LG, Kontoyannis DA, Moulopoulou DS: Clinical and laboratory parameters in adult diabetics with and without calcific shoulder periarthritis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991, 49 (4): 288-291. 10.1007/BF02556220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pal B, Anderson J, Dick WC, Griffiths ID: Limitation of joint mobility and shoulder capsulitis in insulin- and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Br J Rheumatol. 1986, 25 (2): 147-151. 10.1093/rheumatology/25.2.147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramchurn N, Mashamba C, Leitch E, Arutchelvam V, Narayanan K, Weaver J, Hamilton J, Heycock C, Saravanan V, Kelly C: Upper limb musculoskeletal abnormalities and poor metabolic control in diabetes. Eur J Intern Med. 2009, 20 (7): 718-721. 10.1016/j.ejim.2009.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenbloom AL, Silverstein JH: Connective tissue and joint disease in diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1996, 25 (2): 473-483. 10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70335-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Spanheimer RG: Skeletal and rheumatologic complications of diabetes. Adv Endocrinol Metab. 1993, 4: 55-80.Google Scholar
  22. Viikari-Juntura E, Shiri R, Solovieva S, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Varonen H, Kalso E, Ukkola O: Risk factors of atherosclerosis and shoulder pain--is there an association? A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2008, 12 (4): 412-426. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Namdari S, Baldwin K, Glaser D, Green A: Does obesity affect early outcome of rotator cuff repair?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010,Google Scholar
  24. Clement ND, Hallett A, MacDonald D, Howie C, McBirnie J: Does diabetes affect outcome after arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010, 92 (8): 1112-1117. 10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.23571.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Beall DP, Williamson EE, Ly JQ, Adkins MC, Emery RL, Jones TP, Rowland CM: Association of biceps tendon tears with rotator cuff abnormalities: degree of correlation with tears of the anterior and superior portions of the rotator cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003, 180 (3): 633-639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. American Diabetes Association: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33 (Suppl 1): S 62-69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Papatheodorou A, Ellinas P, Takis F, Tsanis A, Maris I, Batakis N: US of the shoulder: rotator cuff and non-rotator cuff disorders. Radiographics. 2006, 26 (1): e23-10.1148/rg.e23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jadoul M, Malghem J, Vande Berg B, van Ypersele de Strihou C: Ultrasonographic detection of thickened joint capsules and tendons as marker of dialysis-related amyloidosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1993, 8 (10): 1104-1109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG, Melson GL, Murphy WA: US of the biceps tendon apparatus. Radiology. 1985, 157 (1): 211-215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamaguchi K, Tetro AM, Blam O, Evanoff BA, Teefey SA, Middleton WD: Natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic tears detected sonographically. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001, 10 (3): 199-203. 10.1067/mse.2001.113086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yamaguchi K, Ditsios K, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Galatz LM, Teefey SA: The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88 (8): 1699-1704. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00835.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fukuda H, Hamada K, Yamanaka K: Pathology and pathogenesis of bursal-side rotator cuff tears viewed from en bloc histologic sections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990, 254: 75-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodmurphy CW, Osborn J, Akesson EJ, Johnson S, Stanescu V, Regan WD: An immunocytochemical analysis of torn rotator cuff tendon taken at the time of repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003, 12 (4): 368-374. 10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00034-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hegedus EJ, Cook C, Fiander C, Wright A: Measures of arch height and their relationship to pain and dysfunction in people with lower limb impairments. Physiother Res Int. 2010,Google Scholar
  35. Ishii H, Brunet JA, Welsh RP, Uhthoff HK: "Bursal reactions" in rotator cuff tearing, the impingement syndrome, and calcifying tendinitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997, 6 (2): 131-136. 10.1016/S1058-2746(97)90033-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rudzki JR, Adler RS, Warren RF, Kadrmas WR, Verma N, Pearle AD, Lyman S, Fealy S: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound characterization of the vascularity of the rotator cuff tendon: age- and activity-related changes in the intact asymptomatic rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008, 17 (1 Suppl): 96S-100S. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McDermott FT: Repetition strain injury: a review of current understanding. Med J Aust. 1986, 144 (4): 196-200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Northover JR, Lunn P, Clark DI, Phillipson M: Risk factors for the development of rotator cuff disease. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2007, 1: 82-86. 10.4103/0973-6042.34025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolff AB, Sethi P, Sutton KM, Covey AS, Magit DP, Medvecky M: Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006, 14 (13): 715-725.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Worland RL, Lee D, Orozco CG, SozaRex F, Keenan J: Correlation of age, acromial morphology, and rotator cuff tear pathology diagnosed by ultrasound in asymptomatic patients. J South Orthop Assoc. 2003, 12 (1): 23-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. DeGroot J: The AGE of the matrix: chemistry, consequence and cure. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2004, 4 (3): 301-305. 10.1016/j.coph.2004.01.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dutta U, Cohenford MA, Guha M, Dain JA: Non-enzymatic interactions of glyoxylate with lysine, arginine, and glucosamine: a study of advanced non-enzymatic glycation like compounds. Bioorg Chem. 2007, 35 (1): 11-24. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2006.07.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Reiser KM: Nonenzymatic glycation of collagen in aging and diabetes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1998, 218 (1): 23-37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ippolito E, Natali PG, Postacchini F, Accinni L, De Martino C: Morphological, immunochemical, and biochemical study of rabbit achilles tendon at various ages. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980, 62 (4): 583-598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lander HM, Tauras JM, Ogiste JS, Hori O, Moss RA, Schmidt AM: Activation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products triggers a p21(ras)-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway regulated by oxidant stress. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (28): 17810-17814. 10.1074/jbc.272.28.17810.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Valencia JV, Weldon SC, Quinn D, Kiers GH, DeGroot J, TeKoppele JM, Hughes TE: Advanced glycation end product ligands for the receptor for advanced glycation end products: biochemical characterization and formation kinetics. Anal Biochem. 2004, 324 (1): 68-78. 10.1016/j.ab.2003.09.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Franke S, Sommer M, Ruster C, Bondeva T, Marticke J, Hofmann G, Hein G, Wolf G: Advanced glycation end products induce cell cycle arrest and proinflammatory changes in osteoarthritic fibroblast-like synovial cells. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009, 11 (5): R136-10.1186/ar2807.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Goldin A, Beckman JA, Schmidt AM, Creager MA: Advanced glycation end products: sparking the development of diabetic vascular injury. Circulation. 2006, 114 (6): 597-605. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.621854.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. McCarthy AD, Etcheverry SB, Bruzzone L, Lettieri G, Barrio DA, Cortizo AM: Non-enzymatic glycosylation of a type I collagen matrix: effects on osteoblastic development and oxidative stress. BMC Cell Biol. 2001, 2: 16-10.1186/1471-2121-2-16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Saito M, Fujii K, Soshi S, Tanaka T: Reductions in degree of mineralization and enzymatic collagen cross-links and increases in glycation-induced pentosidine in the femoral neck cortex in cases of femoral neck fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2006, 17 (7): 986-995. 10.1007/s00198-006-0087-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Basta G, Lazzerini G, Massaro M, Simoncini T, Tanganelli P, Fu C, Kislinger T, Stern DM, Schmidt AM, De Caterina R: Advanced glycation end products activate endothelium through signal-transduction receptor RAGE: a mechanism for amplification of inflammatory responses. Circulation. 2002, 105 (7): 816-822. 10.1161/hc0702.104183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Steenvoorden MM, Toes RE, Ronday HK, Huizinga TW, DeGroot J: RAGE activation induces invasiveness of RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes in vitro. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007, 25 (5): 740-742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Handa A, Gotoh M, Hamada K, Yanagisawa K, Yamazaki H, Nakamura M, Ueyama Y, Mochida J, Fukuda H: Vascular endothelial growth factor 121 and 165 in the subacromial bursa are involved in shoulder joint contracture in type II diabetics with rotator cuff disease. J Orthop Res. 2003, 21 (6): 1138-1144. 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00102-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Perry SM, McIlhenny SE, Hoffman MC, Soslowsky LJ: Inflammatory and angiogenic mRNA levels are altered in a supraspinatus tendon overuse animal model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005, 14 (1 Suppl S): 79S-83S. 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rodeo SA: Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff tendon repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007, 16 (5 Suppl): S191-S197. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryu JD, Kirpalani PA, Kim JM, Nam KH, Han CW, Han SH: Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis in the diabetic frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006, 15 (6): 679-685. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Crispin JC, Alcocer-Varela J: Rheumatologic manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2003, 114 (9): 753-757. 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00140-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Jennings AM, Milner PC, Ward JD: Hand abnormalities are associated with the complications of diabetes in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 1989, 6 (1): 43-47. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1989.tb01137.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith LL, Burnet SP, McNeil JD: Musculoskeletal manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Br J Sports Med. 2003, 37 (1): 30-35. 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Armstrong A, Teefey SA, Wu T, Clark AM, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K, Galats LM: The efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006, 15 (1): 7-11. 10.1016/j.jse.2005.04.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Moosmayer S, Heir S, Smith HJ: Sonography of the rotator cuff in painful shoulders performed without knowledge of clinical information: results from 58 sonographic examinations with surgical correlation. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007, 35 (1): 20-26. 10.1002/jcu.20286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/278/prepub

Copyright

© Abate et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.