Pressure pain sensitivity maps of the neck-shoulder and the low back regions in men and women
© Binderup et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 7 April 2010
Accepted: 12 October 2010
Published: 12 October 2010
Musculoskeletal pain in the low back and neck-shoulder regions is a major problem among the working population all over the world. The prevalence of musculoskeletal pain is found to be higher among women. Women also have lower pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) than men. Pressure pain topography aims at mapping the spatial distribution of PPT within a muscle in an attempt to track changes in mechanical sensitivity. In order to assess gender differences in the pain topography, it is necessary to map the distribution in both healthy men and women. The aim of this study was to assess PPT maps from the cervico-thoracic and lumbar regions in men and women.
Eleven men and eleven women without any known musculoskeletal disorders participated in the study. PPT was measured twice at 36 points over the trapezius muscle of the dominant arm, at 36 points over the trapezius muscle on the contralateral side and at 12 points over the spine between the left and right trapezius. Further, 11 points were measured over the erector spinae muscle on the left side of the spine between the first and the fifth lumbar vertebrae, 11 on the right side and 5 points on the spine itself. The measurements on each trapezius muscle were divided according to anatomical subdivisions. Three-way and two-way ANOVAs were used to analyse the differences in PPTs with the following factors: gender, locations and sub-divisions (only for cervico-thoracic region).
There were no differences between left and right side in neither the cervico-thoracic nor the lumbar region, but there were (large effect) differences between the subdivisions in the trapezius with the lowest values in the upper part (P < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.19). Women had (small effect) lower PPT in both cervico-thoracic and lumbar regions (P ≤ 0.001; partial η2 = 0.02 for both regions), but gender had no effect on neither location nor subdivisions.
The pain topography was not found to be different between genders in the cervico-thoracic and lumbar regions. This study can be used as basis for further clinical studies on musculoskeletal disorders.
Chronic musculoskeletal pain causes reduced quality of life with loss of work and social networks . The use of quantitative diagnostic tests for mechanistic evaluation of musculoskeletal pain is important as many mechanisms such as soreness, hyperalgesia and spreading of pain/sensitization are involved . Chronic musculoskeletal pain is most often reported from the low back and shoulder regions . Further, a recent epidemiological study has emphasized a correlation between low back and neck pain in adults . Moreover, the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders accompanied by pain is higher in women compared with men . Thus, the study of mechanical sensitivity and the spread of pain in the neck-shoulder (cervico-thoracic) and low back (lumbar) regions can help characterizing these pain conditions in men and women.
Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) are found to be reduced in whiplash [6, 7] and work-related musculoskeletal pain [8–10]. In addition PPTs are found to be lower in women as compared with men [6, 11–16], and the cause of this difference is not fully understood [14, 17] but assumed to include both physiological , cultural  and psychological factors .
Pressure pain algometry is a reliable technique  for the assessment of mechanical pain sensitivity of deep somatic structures. However, PPTs are found to vary along a muscle [22, 23]. Hence, recordings of PPTs at many locations over a body region can delineate the extent of hyperalgesia . Recently, PPT mapping of the trapezius muscle has underlined spatial pain sensitivity differences among subdivisions of the muscle  indicating sensory partitioning .
The aims of this study were 1) to assess PPT maps from the left and right trapezius muscles as well as the lumbar region, including the spinal processes from the first to the fifth lumbar vertebra and the extensor spinae muscles on both sides of the spine and 2) to investigate gender differences in PPT maps. We hypothesized lower PPT in women compared with men and symmetry in the topography of the PPT maps among genders.
Twenty-two healthy volunteers participated in this study. For the men (N = 11) the average age (± standard deviation) was 23.4 ± 2.5 years, height was 181.2 ± 6.5 cm, body mass was 75.1 ± 8.4 kg and body mass index was 22.9 ± 2.3 kg/m2. For the women (N = 11) the average age was 23.9 ± 3.4 years, height was 167.1 ± 8.0 cm, body mass was 62.5 ± 9.7 kg and body mass index was 22.3 ± 2.6 kg/m2. One person in each gender group was left handed while the remaining ten were right handed. None of the subjects reported pain or soreness in the neck-shoulder or low back regions prior to entering the study. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (No. N-20070004) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects signed an informed consent upon entering the study.
Both absolute PPT values and normalized PPT values were analyzed. For the normalization procedure for each subject we divided all absolute PPT values by the mean PPT value. The measurements were made alternately on the left and right side for subjects with dominant left hand. For the cervico-thoracic region the 36 measurement points were divided according to gender, location (left side, right side and center/spinal processes) and subdivisions, roughly matching the three anatomical subdivisions of the muscle (upper, middle, lower trapezius) along with a fourth part corresponding to the points located on the spinal processes (see fig. 1). A three-way analysis of variance (3-way ANOVA) with factors: gender, location and subdivision was used for the cervico-thoracic region. For the lumbar region the 27 measurements points were only divided according to gender and location (left side, right side and center/spinal processes, see fig. 2). A 2-way ANOVA with factors: gender and location was used for the lumbar region. To evaluate the intra-examiner variability, we computed the correlation (Pearson, two-tailed) between the first and the second round of PPT measurements (according to point location, not measurement order) used to compute the mean PPT value for each subject. For the statistical analysis P < 0.05 was considered significant. In order to report effect size we computed partial η2 (SSfactor/(SSfactor + SSerror) where SSfactor is the variation attributable to the factor and SSerror is the error variation). Post hoc tests were made using Bonferroni adjustment. All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation and ranges.
There was significant correlation for all subjects between the two rounds of PPT measurements for both the cervico-thoracic region (correlation coefficient: 0.82 ± 0.07) and the lumbar region (correlation coefficient: 0.91 ± 0.07).
Cervico-thoracic region and gender
Pairwise comparisons of absolute and normalized pressure pain thresholds (PPT) from the cervico-thoracic region.
Absolute PPT (kPa)
295.2 ± 95.9 *,†,‡
[99 - 981]
0.88 ± 0.20 *,†,‡
[0.30 - 2.08]
347.5 ± 103.5 *, •
[138 - 745]
1.04 ± 0.18 *, •
373.0 ± 121.1 †, •
[127 - 920]
1.11 ± 0.21 †, •, Δ
369.6 ± 116.5 ‡
[156 - 689]
1.04 ± 0.17 ‡,Δ
[0.55 - 1.58]
Lumbar region and gender
Pairwise comparisons of absolute and normalized pressure pain thresholds (PPT) from the lumbar region.
Absolute PPT (kPa)
447.5 ± 229.3 *
[167 - 1596]
0.97 ± 0.16 *
[0.55 - 1.60]
536.0 ± 269.5 *,†
[165 - 1645]
1.15 ± 0.29 *,†
[0.70 - 2.08]
455.5 ± 258.2 †
[181 - 1926]
0.97 ± 0.15 †
[0.52 - 1.44]
The study revealed heterogeneity in the topography of the pressure pain sensitivity maps in both the cervico-thoracic and the lumbar regions. The pain topography was symmetrical along the spine for both cervico-thoracic and lumbar regions, and there was no difference between left and right side for the cervico-thoracic region while differences were found for the lumbar region. The lower part of the trapezius was the least sensitive to pressure pain while the upper part was the most sensitive. Further, the measurements from the lumbar region showed that musculo-tendinous tissue was more sensitive to pressure than the bones. These proportional topographic differences were observed in both men and women. Furthermore, despite its low population size and small effect size, the present study confirmed that women have lower PPTs than men.
The present study despite its limitations (see Methodological limitations) showed that women had lower absolute PPT values than men in line with previous studies [6, 11–16]. Differences were also found in the lumbar region supporting previous results reported in the erector spinae muscle group [27, 28] while no gender differences are reported in the masseter muscle  suggesting that gender differences in pressure pain sensitivity may be muscle specific. There is to date no clear understanding of these gender differences [14, 17], but the causes are most likely multi-factorial including physiological (e.g. sub-cutaneous fat, muscle size), cultural and psychological components [18–20]. For example, the fact that gender differences are reported to be related to levels of gonadal hormones  has been challenged by a recent paper showing no relation between menstruation cycle and pressure pain sensation in the trapezius muscle .
The pain sensitivity maps could be influenced by the probe size, but as the receptive fields of the muscle nociceptors in both men and women have been found to be far greater (>3 cm2)  than the size of the probe used (1 cm2), this should not be of major importance. Though, the relative size difference between the muscle and the probe might have an influence as it has been shown that an increase in the probe size will result in a lower PPT when applied to a trapezius muscle due to spatial summation . As women in general have smaller muscles, this relative difference may contribute to the lower pressure pain thresholds. Another aspect is the greater degree of muscle temporal summation in women  which could cause increased pain integration during the duration of the pressure stimulus causing lower PPTs. Therefore, it is most likely that peripheral and central mechanisms are responsible for gender differences in PPT. Future studies investigating further the role of peripheral and central mechanisms are warranted.
Topographical mapping of pain sensitivity
The pressure pain maps of the neck-shoulder and low back regions delineated spatial changes. On the other hand, no differences between genders were found in the normalized PPT maps. The normalization procedure of the PPT data removed the absolute differences in PPT among genders. This was done to enable the study of the spatial information contained in the PPT maps. The lower part of trapezius was less sensitive than the upper part which is in line with our previous findings . This further supports the relation between the anatomical subdivisions of the muscle , neuromuscular activity [36, 37] and sensory partitioning . This gradient in pressure pain levels could also be related to the different amounts of measurement points located on muscle belly and musculo-tendinous tissue within each subdivision as musculo-tendinous parts are less sensitive to pressure pain than the muscle belly parts [22, 23]. These results further support the importance of the upper part of the trapezius muscle as a major contributor to musculoskeletal pain in the neck-shoulder region .
The assessments along the spine did not show distinct differences in sensitivity but showed a gradual increase in PPT in the caudal direction in line with a recent study by O'Neill et al. . In accordance with our results previous studies also found no difference in PPT between sides in the upper back and shoulder regions [22, 27, 40]. In the lumbar region of the back there were symmetrical proportions in the pain topography between the left and right erector spinae muscle, while the measurements on the spine part showed that it was far less sensitive to pressure pain than the musculo-tendinous parts. The measurements on the edge of the muscles showed to be the most sensitive, which is in accordance with previous studies investigating the lumbar region in healthy subjects .
The reliability of the PPT measurements in the present study was found to be high. This is in line with the excellent inter-examiner reliability in PPTs measured in healthy subjects . The effect sizes were low for PPT differences among genders and medium to large for differences in trapezius sub-divisions and spinal processes and the left/right side of the lumbar region. This meant that these factors accounted for 2-19% of the overall variance. Thus, we should recognize that the present gender differences were minor and that greater sample sizes are required to delineate gender effects. The distance between adjacent points and the time between consecutive measurements at the same point (at least 10 minutes) prevented spatial and temporal summation [24, 33]. We have also recently reported that PPT values are unchanged in healthy subjects when comparing measurements performed with intervals of 30 minutes and 24 hours . However, this might not be the case in patient populations.
The present study reported for the first time the spatial distribution of pressure pain sensitivity in cervico-thoracic and lumbar regions among healthy subjects. Despite the low population size and the small effect size we found that women were more sensitive than men to pressure pain stimulation in both the cervico-thoracic and the lumbar regions with no gender differences in normalized pressure pain maps. This investigation provides the basis for further clinical studies on e.g. chronic shoulder pain, low back pain or osteoporosis.
This study was partly supported by grants from Gigtforeningen and the Danish Working Environment Authority ("Finale" and "Undersøgelse af manifestationer, årsagsmekanismer samt progression af smerter hos computerbrugere" projects).
- Turk DC: Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Patients With Chronic Pain. Clin J Pain. 2002, 18: 355-365. 10.1097/00002508-200211000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arendt-Nielsen L, Graven-Nielsen T: Muscle pain: sensory implications and interaction with motor control. Clin J Pain. 2008, 24: 291-298. 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31815b608f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D: Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006, 10: 287-333. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strine TW, Hootman JM: US national prevalence and correlates of low back and neck pain among adults. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 57: 656-665. 10.1002/art.22684.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leboeuf-Yde C, Nielsen J, Kyvik KO, Fejer R, Hartvigsen J: Pain in the lumbar, thoracic or cervical regions: do age and gender matter? A population-based study of 34,902 Danish twins 20-71 years of age. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009, 10: 39-10.1186/1471-2474-10-39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rivest K, Cote JN, Dumas JP, Sterling M, De Serres SJ: Relationships between pain thresholds, catastrophizing and gender in acute whiplash injury. Man Ther. 2010, 15: 154-159. 10.1016/j.math.2009.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neill S, Manniche C, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L: Generalized deep-tissue hyperalgesia in patients with chronic low-back pain. Eur J Pain. 2007, 11: 415-420. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.05.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Langballe EM, Innstrand ST, Hagtvet KA, Falkum E, Gjerlow Aasland O: The relationship between burnout and musculoskeletal pain in seven Norwegian occupational groups. Work. 2009, 32: 179-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nordander C, Ohlsson K, Balogh I, Hansson GA, Axmon A, Persson R, Skerfving S: Gender differences in workers with identical repetitive industrial tasks: exposure and musculoskeletal disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008, 81: 939-947. 10.1007/s00420-007-0286-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madeleine P, Lundager B, Voigt M, Arendt-Nielsen L: Sensory manifestations in experimental and work-related chronic neck-shoulder pain. Eur J Pain. 1998, 2: 251-260. 10.1016/S1090-3801(98)90021-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chesterton LS, Barlas P, Foster NE, Baxter GD, Wright CC: Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans. Pain. 2003, 101: 259-266. 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00330-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ge HY, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L: Gender differences in pain modulation evoked by repeated injections of glutamate into the human trapezius muscle. Pain. 2005, 113: 134-140. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ge HY, Madeleine P, Cairns BE, Arendt-Nielsen L: Hypoalgesia in the referred pain areas after bilateral injections of hypertonic saline into the trapezius muscles of men and women: a potential experimental model of gender-specific differences. Clin J Pain. 2006, 22: 37-44. 10.1097/01.ajp.0000149799.01123.38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hurley RW, Adams MC: Sex, gender, and pain: an overview of a complex field. Anesth Analg. 2008, 107: 309-317. 10.1213/01.ane.0b013e31816ba437.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Garcia E, Godoy-Izquierdo D, Godoy JF, Perez M, Lopez-Chicheri I: Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in a repeated measures assessment. Psychol Health Med. 2007, 12: 567-579. 10.1080/13548500701203433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soetanto AL, Chung JW, Wong TK: Are there gender differences in pain perception?. J Neurosci Nurs. 2006, 38: 172-176. 10.1097/01376517-200606000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Berkley KJ, Fillingim RB, Gold MS, Holdcroft A, Lautenbacher S, Mayer EA, Mogil JS, Murphy AZ, Traub RJ: Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: A consensus report. Pain. 2007, 132 (Suppl 1): 26-45. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cairns BE: The influence of gender and sex steroids on craniofacial nociception. Headache. 2007, 47: 319-324. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00708.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dawson A, List T: Comparison of pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels between Middle Easterners and Swedes and between genders. J Oral Rehabil. 2009, 36: 271-278. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01943.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller C, Newton SE: Pain perception and expression: the influence of gender, personal self-efficacy, and lifespan socialization. Pain Manag Nurs. 2006, 7: 148-152. 10.1016/j.pmn.2006.09.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ylinen J, Nykanen M, Kautiainen H, Hakkinen A: Evaluation of repeatability of pressure algometry on the neck muscles for clinical use. Man Ther. 2007, 12: 192-197. 10.1016/j.math.2006.06.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nie H, Kawczynski A, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L: Delayed onset muscle soreness in neck/shoulder muscles. Eur J Pain. 2005, 9: 653-660. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.12.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen H, Arendt-Nielsen L, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Graven-Nielsen T: Pressure pain sensitivity and hardness along human normal and sensitized muscle. Somatosens Mot Res. 2006, 23: 97-109. 10.1080/08990220600856255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Binderup AT, Arendt-Nielsen L, Madeleine P: Pressure pain threshold mapping of the trapezius muscle reveals heterogeneity in the distribution of muscular hyperalgesia after eccentric exercise. Eur J Pain. 2010, 14: 705-712. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Windhorst U, Hamm TM, Stuart DG: On the Function of Muscle and Reflex Partitioning. Behav Brain Sci. 1989, 12: 629-644. 10.1017/S0140525X00024985.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Binderup AT, Arendt-Nielsen L, Madeleine P: Pressure pain threshold mapping - A new imaging modality of muscle sensitivity to pain. 2008 Annual IEEE Student Paper Conference. 2008, 1: 126-129.Google Scholar
- Fischer AA: Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain. 1987, 30: 115-126. 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90089-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loram L, Horwitz E, Bentley A: Gender and site of injection do not influence intensity of hypertonic saline-induced muscle pain in healthy volunteers. Man Ther. 2009, 14: 526-530. 10.1016/j.math.2008.09.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svensson P, Cairns BE, Wang K, Hu JW, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L, Sessle BJ: Glutamate-evoked pain and mechanical allodynia in the human masseter muscle. Pain. 2003, 101: 221-227. 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00079-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aloisi AM: Gonadal hormones and sex differences in pain reactivity. Clin J Pain. 2003, 19: 168-174. 10.1097/00002508-200305000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sjölund BH, Persson AL: Pressure pain threshold changes after repeated mechano-nociceptive stimulation of the trapezius muscle: Possible influence of previous pain experience. J Pain. 2007, 8: 355-362. 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simone DA, Marchettini P, Caputi G, Ochoa JL: Identification of muscle afferents subserving sensation of deep pain in humans. J Neurophysiol. 1994, 72: 883-889.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nie H, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L: Spatial and temporal summation of pain evoked by mechanical pressure stimulation. Eur J Pain. 2009, 13: 592-599. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.07.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ge HY, Arendt-Nielsen L, Farina D, Madeleine P: Gender-specific differences in electromyographic changes and perceived pain induced by experimental muscle pain during sustained contractions of the upper trapezius muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2005, 32: 726-733. 10.1002/mus.20410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Travell JG, Simons DG, Simons LS: Trapezius muscle. Travell & Simons' Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction - The Trigger Point Manual. Edited by: Jonson EP. 1999, Baltimore: Lippincott Willians & Wilkins, 1: 278-303.Google Scholar
- Madeleine P, Leclerc F, Arendt-Nielsen L, Ravier P, Farina D: Experimental muscle pain changes the spatial distribution of upper trapezius muscle activity during sustained contraction. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006, 117: 2436-2445. 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.753.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madeleine P, Samani A, Binderup AT, Stensdotter AK: Changes in the spatio-temporal organization of the trapezius muscle activity in response to eccentric contractions. Scand J Med Sci Sports.Google Scholar
- Punnett L, Wegman DH: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004, 14: 13-23. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neill S, Graven-Nielsen T, Manniche C, Arendt-Nielsen L: Ultrasound guided, painful electrical stimulation of lumbar facet joint structures: an experimental model of acute low back pain. Pain. 2009, 144: 76-83. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirayama J, Yamagata M, Ogata S, Shimizu K, Ikeda Y, Takahashi K: Relationship between low-back pain, muscle spasm and pressure pain thresholds in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J. 2006, 15: 41-47. 10.1007/s00586-004-0813-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Antonaci F, Sand T, Lucas GA: Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: inter-examiner variability. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998, 30: 3-8. 10.1080/003655098444255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/234/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.