Skip to main content

Operative treatment of isolated epiphyseal fracture of the distal fibula: 1 case report and literature review

Abstract

Pediatric ankle injuries are common; ankle epiphyseal fractures are also common in children. But isolated distal epiphyseal fibular fractures of the distal fibula are clinically rare. We describe one unusual case of an adolescent with a completely displaced Salter-Harris type II distal fibular epiphyseal fracture. The attempt of closed reduction failed, and the patient required open reduction and internal fixation. The localized periosteum and the superior peroneal retinaculum were avulsed from the distal fibular metaphysis, with the peroneal tendons underneath exposed but no obvious subluxation. To the best of our knowledge, this combination of injuries has not been previously reported.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Epiphyseal injuries are common in children with 12% of fractures of the long bone involving the physis [1], and lower extremity physeal injuries comprised 58.6% of all physeal fractures [2]. Previous studies have reported that physeal fractures make up 18–30% of total fractures [2]. Ankle fractures in children are the third most common fracture involving the growth plate [3]. Ankle fractures in children and adolescents usually are concurrent fractures of the distal tibial and fibular epiphysis. The isolated epiphyseal fracture of the distal fibula is clinically rare in adolescents. The most common fracture type of the distal fibula according to the Salter-Harris (SH) classification are SH type I and II, which are most commonly supination-inversion injuries [4]. The purpose of this article is to highlight a displaced physeal distal fibula fracture that required open reduction due to interposed periosteum and SPR.

Case report

A 14-year-old male was admitted to the emergency room of our hospital, in May 2021 presenting with left ankle pain after a mechanical fall on the ground. The patient’s personnel and family histories are both unremarkable. Examinations revealed tenderness on the lateral side of the ankle; complete ankle functional impotence and moderately swelling were observed, without any apparent nerve involvement. Standard radiographs revealed a distal epiphyseal fracture of the fibula (Fig. 1). Under epidural anesthesia, the fracture could not be reduced through manipulation. Subsequently, an open reduction and fixation procedure was undertaken using three percutaneous retrograde k-wires. During the operation, the fracture ends were rotationally displaced forward and downward. An epiphysiolysis of the distal fibula was found with a localized periosteum tear and fibular avulsion of the superior peroneal retinaculum (SPR) (Fig. 2). The free fragment trapped in the syndesmosis was removed. The stability of syndesmosis was evaluated by external rotation stress test and hook test, and the torn periosteum and superior peroneal retinaculum were repaired after reduction and fixation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A: Standard AP and lateral radiographs taken on presentation to the emergency. B-C: Typical imaging of coronal CT and 3D images showing the fragment trapped in the syndesmosis

Fig. 2
figure 2

An epiphysiolysis of the distal fibula with a localized periosteum tear and fibular avulsion of the SPR. The peroneal tendons underneath exposed but no obvious subluxation

After surgery, the patient was immobilized with a below-knee cast for 6 weeks. X-rays taken at the end of this period showed healing of the fracture, leading to the removal of the cast and Kirschner pin. The patient successfully returned to his pre-injury level of activity 12 weeks later. At 2 years follow-up, the patient was able to perform full range of motion without any restriction and engage in high-intensity exercises without any pain or discomfort, indicating satisfactory recovery of his ankle function without any complications (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

AP and lateral radiographic views of the left ankle during surgery confirming reduction after open reduction and internal fixation and 6 months postoperatively

All procedures undertaken in this current case were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and followed the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. The reporting of this case report conforms to CARE guidelines [5].

Discussion

Isolated pediatric lateral ankle injuries are common orthopaedic sports-related injuries, mainly including ankle sprain and nondisplaced SH type I distal fibular fracture [6]. Reviewing the literature, there were only five reported cases of isolated epiphyseal fractures of the distal fibula (Table 1). The first case reported as early as 2010 described a SH type IV fibular epiphyseal fracture [7], which was a triplane fracture of the distal fibula. This represents a specific stereotype fracture pattern because of the asymmetric physeal closure and it’s proof that transitional fractures can occur also in locations other than the distal tibia. After this, two cases were reported in 2013: one was a SH type IV fracture with a fragment of the distal fibular metaphysis. The fragment was rotated and incarcerated in the distal tibiofibular joint causing syndesmotic diastasis [8]. The other was a SH type III fracture in which a displaced epiphyseal fragment was wedged in the syndesmosis. The authors [9] postulated that the mechanism of injury was a supination-internal rotation injury, which could be thought of as a reverse Tillaux-type injury. Under the strongly internally rotated anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), there was causing an avulsion fracture of the distal fibular epiphysis.

Table 1 Case reports of isolated epiphyseal fractures of distal fibular

Displaced epiphyseal fractures of the distal fibula are even less commonly encountered. An article reported two of this type of fracture, both of which were completely displaced SH type I fractures [10]. As the closed distal tibial physis or the child is close to skeletal maturity, the Surgeon chose different fixation strategies with a one-third tubular plate or cannulated screw. In our case, the patient had a completely displaced SH type II distal fibula epiphyseal fracture with a localized periosteal tear and avulsion trapped between the joint space. Fortunately, preoperative imaging showed that the medial clear space was essentially normal. During the operation, the integrity and stability of the syndesmosis were assessed, and the ankle mortise was confirmed to be in good condition. The occurrence of isolated and displaced distal fibular epiphyseal fracture was closely related to the age of the patient, or more accurately, the degree of closure of physis. Transitional fracture occurs during the transition between adolescence and skeletal maturity (1112). The type of ankle transitional fracture is determined by the ankle injury mechanism and the degree of distal tibial and fibular epiphyseal closure. When the distal tibial physis were nearing complete closure, the energy propagated through the distal fibular physis causing the isolated fibular epiphyseal fracture [10]. What’s more, this type of fracture has a close association with syndesmosis. These factors often influence the choice of surgical repair strategies. Studies have shown that in all cases of isolated distal fibula fractures with widened medial clear space (stressed X-ray) on MR, at least two ligaments-usually the deltoid and syndesmosis groups were partially or completely torn, wherein the AITFL of the syndesmosis suffered complete interruption [13]. The stability of syndesmosis was assessed in almost all the above cases, demonstrating its significant importance. The treatment differs depending on the stability of the syndesmosis. With adequately conducted treatment, all patients had satisfactory outcomes with good function and no complications.

Two patients attempted closed reduction but failed. Patients in all cases were treated with an open reduction and internal fixation finally. Closed reduction was attempted but failed as in previous case reports. Complete epiphyseal displacement, torn periosteum, and trapped fragment may obstruct fracture reduction in this type of fracture. Of note, a localized periosteum tear and fibular avulsion of the SPR were found during the operation. The peroneal tendon (PT) underneath was exposed and compressed by the rotationally displaced epiphyseal fracture ends, but there was no obvious subluxation of the PT. We hypothesize that the torn SPR and compression of the fracture ends to PT are also critical reasons for the failure of closed reduction. Displaced fibular epiphyseal injuries are clinically rare, and to the best of our knowledge, this type of injury complex has not been previously reported. The SPR originates from the posterior portion of the distal fibula at the level of the ankle joint line and attaches to the adjacent periosteum, under which the PT passes through the posterior groove of the lateral malleolus [14]. The SPR is an important stabilizing structure that restricts the peroneal tendon from subluxation [15,16,17]. The injury of SPR will cause chronic pain and subsequent instability of the ankle. The “Ankle fleck sign”, a linear flake at the lateral cortex of the distal fibula, is a specific signal of rupture of the SPR and PT subluxation. It can be seen on the preoperative X-ray and during the surgery. The close correlation between completely displaced distal fibula epiphyseal fracture and SPR injury needs to be emphasized and further investigated (1819). Similarly, routine CT examination was recommended to clarify the condition of fracture displacement, evaluate the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, rule out occult fractures, and assist surgical planning for better treatment and prognosis.

Conclusion

This article specifically focuses on the surgical management of isolated epiphyseal fractures of the distal fibula, highlighting the unique challenges posed by the interposed periosteum and SPR. A literature review identified five cases of this fracture type and a comparative analysis was conducted on their characteristics, injury mechanisms, and treatment strategies. Prompt and accurate diagnosis and treatment are paramount for effective management of these injuries. The experiences and lessons learned from these cases provide clinicians and researchers with valuable insights and practical guidance.

Data availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its additional files. No additional data are available.

Abbreviations

SH:

Salter-Harris

AITFL:

Anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament

SPR:

Superior peroneal retinaculum

PT:

Peroneal tendon

References

  1. Habusta SF, Ponnarasu S, Mabrouk A et al. Tillaux Fracture. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; April 22, 2023. PMID: 29493957.

  2. Fuchs JR, Gibly RF, Erickson CB, et al. Child (Basel). 2022;9(6):914. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9060914. Analysis of Physeal Fractures from the United States National Trauma Data Bank.

  3. Shore BJ, Kramer DE. Management of Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(Suppl 1):S11–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parikh SN, Mehlman CT. The Community Orthopaedic Surgeon taking trauma call: Pediatric Ankle fracture pearls and pitfalls. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(Suppl 6):S27–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, CARE Group. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Headache. 2013; 53(10): 1541–1547. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.12246. PMID: 24266334.

  6. Beck JJ, Carpenter CM, West N, et al. Treatment Variability and Complications Associated with Pediatric lateral ankle injuries: a POSNA Quality, Safety, and Value Initiative Survey. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(6):23259671221100223. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221100223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruffing T, Muhm M, Winkler H. Triplane fracture of the distal fibula. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36(4):392–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-9030-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lugeder A, Jäger C, Fecht E, et al. Salter-Harris-Typ-IV-Epiphysenfraktur Am Außenknöchel. Eine Seltene Verletzung Im Kindesalter [Salter-Harris type IV epiphyseal fracture of the lateral malleolus. A rare injury in childhood]. Unfallchirurg. 2014;117(2):169–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-013-2362-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson NA, Mangwani J. Fibula physeal fracture causing syndesmotic diastasis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20(1):e11–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2013.10.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Korsh J, Adolfsen S. Displaced Salter-Harris type I distal Fibula fractures: two case reports and a review of the literature. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(4):845–50. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schnetzler KA, Hoernschemeyer D. The pediatric triplane ankle fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(12):738–47. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200712000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Venkatadass K, Sangeet G, Prasad VD, et al. Paediatric ankle fractures: guidelines to management. Indian J Orthop. 2020;55(1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00270-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung Y, Perrich KD, Gui J, et al. MRI of isolated distal fibular fractures with widened medial clear space on stressed radiographs: which ligaments are interrupted? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(1):W7–12. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1092.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang W, Bai RJ, Qian ZH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of normal anatomy and injury of the peroneal tendon. Natl Med J China. 2020;100(17):1305–9. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.i.cn112137-20191125-02559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Davda K, Malhotra K, O’Donnell P, et al. Peroneal tendon disorders. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(6):281–92. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lv HR, Xu HL. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of peroneal tendon injury. Chin J Bone Joint Surg. 2020;13(4):341–7. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2020.04.16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang X, Zhao WB, Tang Kl, et al. Research progress in the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of peroneal tendon spondylolisthesis. Chin J Trauma. 2022;38(8):750–9. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20220223-00132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong-Chung J, Tucker A, Lynch-Wong M, et al. The lateral malleolar bony fleck classified by size and pathoanatomy: the IOFAS classification. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24(4):300–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mertens K, Vanhoenacker F. The Ankle Fleck sign indicating Fibular Avulsion of the Superior Peroneal Retinaculum. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2022;106(1):92. https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2884.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the patient and his family for providing consent to use his data in this case report.

Funding

The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research received funding from the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. ZR2022MH171).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yanchen Liang and Yanbo Guo were the patient’s attending physicians. Zhongbo Jiang, Liang Yue, Deheng Wang and Cheng Jing reviewed the literature and contributed to manuscript drafting. Yanbo Guo was responsible for the revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors provided final approval for the version to be submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanbo Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of TCM and the legal guardian of the child involved in this study signed the informed consent form.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patient for publication of all the clinical details of this case report and accompanying clinical images.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Z., Yue, L., Wang, D. et al. Operative treatment of isolated epiphyseal fracture of the distal fibula: 1 case report and literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25, 525 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07648-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07648-y

Keywords