Subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck system of femoral neck fractures: a report of four cases
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 24, Article number: 749 (2023)
The femoral neck system (FNS) is commonly used for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures and has shown promising results. However, we have observed cases of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures associated with the use of FNS at our institution. This case series aims to investigate four cases of peri-implant subtrochanteric fractures in patients treated with the FNS implant for femoral neck fractures.
We reviewed 35 patients who underwent treatment with FNS for femoral neck fractures between January 2017 and December 2021 at our level 1 trauma institution. Among these patients, four cases of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures were identified. In contrast, no such fractures occurred in patients treated with cannulated screws or dynamic hip screws (DHS). Interestingly, all four cases of peri-implant fractures were seen in patients with incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. Only one case involved an identifiable technical error.
This case series sheds light on peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures as a previously unreported complication associated with the use of FNS for femoral neck fractures. These fractures were observed exclusively in patients with incomplete nondisplaced fractures who received FNS fixation. No similar complications were observed in patients treated with other types of fixation. This finding suggests the need for caution and further investigation when considering FNS as a treatment option for this specific fracture pattern.
The identification of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures as a potential complication of FNS usage in incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures raises important considerations for clinical decision-making and patient management in orthopedic trauma.
Femoral neck fractures present a challenge for the treating orthopedic surgeon, and various fixation methods are used. The femoral neck system (FNS) is a newer implant that has shown promising results in early biomechanical studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. However, there have been reports of subtrochanteric femur fractures associated with the FNS. In this series, we discuss four cases of peri-implant subtrochanteric fractures after implantation of the FNS.
Peri-implant sub trochanteric fractures have been observed in cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures and are believed to be due to a stress riser caused by placing screws distal to the lesser trochanter [8,9,10]. We suspect the FNS has an increased risk of similar fractures, but the reason is unclear. This series discusses four cases of peri-implant subtrochanteric fractures after implantation of FNS observed over four years of use.
A 68-year-old woman with a medical history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, hypothyroidism, and alkaptonuria was diagnosed with a Garden I fracture after a ground-level fall three weeks before presentation. She reported mild pain in the hip, described as acute on chronic pain in the extremity. The patient underwent internal fixation using a FNS and was allowed to immediately bear weight. She was discharged on postoperative day three to a skilled nursing facility. However, six weeks postoperatively she fell again and was unable to bear weight. A peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fracture at the level of the distal screw was discovered on radiographs, and she was successfully treated with placement of a reamed cephalomedullary nail with cement augmentation. (Fig. 1).
A 41-year-old man with no medical history presented after a gunshot wound to the right proximal femur. Radiographs showed a retained missile, and computed tomography revealed an incomplete, nondisplaced femoral neck fracture involving the anterior cortex of the femur with a retained intracapsular bullet. The patient underwent fixation with an FNS system and was discharged on postoperative day two after an uneventful postoperative course. However, he sustained a peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fracture after a ground-level fall 17 days postoperatively. The patient was treated with a reamed piriformis entry recon nail. Upon critical review of the case, it was discovered that the lateral cortex screws had been replaced to reposition the plate, leaving two unfilled drill holes seen on immediate postoperative radiographs. (Fig. 2).
A 65-year-old man with a past medical history of hypertension and cardiac arrhythmia with a pacemaker presented with insidious onset hip pain that had worsened over the course of a day, necessitating the use of a walker for ambulation. Radiographs revealed a tension-side, incomplete, nondisplaced femoral neck fracture. The patient underwent fixation with an FNS. Six weeks later, he sustained a ground-level fall and was found to have a peri-implant subtrochanteric fracture at the level of the distal screw. The patient was treated with a reamed cephalomedullary nail, which subsequently went on to nonunion. The patient successfully underwent revision one year later with removal of the distal interlocking screws. (Fig. 3).
A 74-year-old female with a past medical history of osteoporosis, end-stage renal disease, deep venous thrombosis with pulmonary embolism, cerebral vascular accident, and peptic ulcers presented with a femoral neck stress fracture. Her contralateral hip was successfully treated for a stress fracture three years ago with three cannulated screws. She had months of antecedent pain in her left hip and was treated with an FNS. At her request, she was discharged home with home health on postoperative day one. Three weeks later, she returned with an insidious onset of left hip pain and an inability to bear weight. Radiographs showed a peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fracture at the level of the distal screw. The time to failure was 21 days. The patient was successfully treated with a cephalomedullary nail. (Fig. 4).
Discussion and conclusions
Peri-implant subtrochanteric fractures are a well-known complication of cannulated screw fixation, which tends to occur when screws are placed distal to the lesser trochanter. Studies have shown that screws placed in this region are associated with an increased risk of peri-implant subtrochanteric fracture [8,9,10]. Our institution started using one-hole lateral plates to place the distal screw proximal to the lesser trochanter whenever possible. As shown in Figs. 3 and 4, patients with one-hole plates were not spared of this complication.
The FNS design is characterized by locking screws in the plate, which increases construct stiffness and is hypothesized to contribute to peri-implant subtrochanteric fracture. In contrast, the SHS features cortical screws that are not locked into a lateral cortex plate. Over the period of observation, no peri-implant fractures occurred in patients who received SHS. Further study is required to explore this aspect in more detail.
Notably, all our cases involved patients with incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures on the tension side of the bone who were treated with the FNS. We made a distinction in the Garden I femoral neck fractures between valgus impacted patterns and incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures when reviewing our cases. We identified eight patients with incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures on the tension side of the neck during our use of the FNS from 2017 to 2021.
Among these eight patients, seven had histories consistent with stress fractures, while one patient sustained a gunshot injury to the femoral neck (Fig. 2). Treatment varied for these patients. Six received an FNS, of which four went on to peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fracture. One received SHS, and one received 3CS, both of which healed without event.
The suggested association between the incomplete non-displaced fracture pattern and peri-implant subtrochanteric fractures has an unknown cause. The authors believe that the stress-fracture pattern implicates poor bone quality throughout the femur and magnifies the stress riser effect on the lateral cortex of the femur, but further biomechanical investigation is needed.
One of the treated patients had multiple holes drilled in the proximal femoral cortex for better placement of the cortical plate (Fig. 2). The subsequent fracture through the unfilled screw hole supports the theory that stress risers created by multiple holes may contribute to the development of peri-implant subtrochanteric fractures. It is important for surgeons to use proper techniques to avoid unnecessary violation of the femoral cortex.
Several studies have demonstrated the favorable biomechanical properties of the FNS. In one such study, Stoffel et al. compared the biomechanical performance of the FNS with 3CS and DHS in 20 cadaveric models. While no difference was found in mean axial stiffness between the groups, 3CS showed significantly fewer cycles until 15 mm of shortening of the femoral neck and the leg compared to both FNS and DHS groups. Overall, this study suggests that the FNS exhibits favorable biomechanics compared to 3CS in the treatment of femoral neck fractures .
Studies reporting clinical outcomes of FNS continue to affirm the safety and efficacy of the FNS. Davidson et al. conducted a retrospective study of 102 patients and reviewed the literature, including 278 patients, reporting a 9.2% revision rate, and concluding that FNS is a safe treatment option for femoral neck fractures . Jiang et al. performed a systematic review and meta-analysis that encompassed eight studies with 448 patients. The analysis revealed that FNS was associated with lower radiation exposure, decreased fracture healing time, reduced femoral head necrosis, fewer implant failures/cutouts, lower visual analog scale scores, and higher Harris hip scores. The authors conclude that FNS is an effective choice for treating femoral neck fractures .
Rajnish et al. conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of six retrospective studies involving 371 young adults aged 18–65 years who were treated with FNS for femoral neck fractures. The analysis revealed that FNS resulted in significantly lower fluoroscopy time and higher blood loss than the 3CS group. However, no significant differences were found in surgery time, incision length, length of hospital stay, complications, pain relief, or functional outcomes. As a result, the study concluded that there were similar outcomes between the FNS and 3CS groups in the young adult population .
Vazquez et al. conducted a retrospective review to assess short-term outcomes in Garden I and II femoral neck fractures in patients aged 75 years or older who were treated with FNS, DHS, and 3CS. The study found a significantly lower duration of surgery in the FNS group, with similar impaction and shortening observed between the groups. This evidence supports the use of FNS for treating femoral neck fractures in elderly patients due to the reduced surgical duration .
Additionally, Nibe et al. retrospectively examined clinical outcomes in 52 patients aged 65 years and older with femoral neck fractures, of which 25 were treated with FNS and 27 with other implants. The FNS group showed shorter operative times, lower reoperation rates, and a 100% union rate. No significant difference in average blood loss was observed. Based on these findings, the study concludes that FNS represents a viable alternative for treating femoral neck fractures in an elderly population due to its shorter surgical times and lower reoperation rates .
Femoral neck fractures are commonly managed with internal fixation methods, and the FNS is a newer option. However, our cases demonstrate that peri-implant subtrochanteric fractures can occur in patients with incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures treated with the FNS. Proper surgical techniques and minimizing violations of the femoral cortex are crucial in preventing these fractures. Further studies are needed to explore the association between the FNS design and the risk of subtrochanteric fractures.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Femoral neck system
Cannulated screw fixation
Sliding hip screw
Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable pauwels III femoral neck fractures: a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(3):131–7.
Vazquez O, Gamulin A, Hannouche D, Belaieff W. Osteosynthesis of non-displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly population using the femoral neck system (FNS): short-term clinical and radiological outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):477.
Zhou XQ, Li ZQ, Xu RJ, et al. Comparison of early clinical results for femoral neck system and cannulated screws in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(6):1802–9.
He C, Lu Y, Wang Q, et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):994.
Nibe Y, Matsumura T, Takahashi T, Kubo T, Matsumoto Y, Takeshita K. A comparison between the femoral neck system and other implants for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture: A preliminary report of a newly developed implant. J Orthop Sci. 2022;27(4):876–80.
Stassen RC, Jeuken RM, Boonen B, et al. First clinical results of 1-year follow-up of the femoral neck system for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142:3755–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04216-0.
Augat P, Bliven E, Hackl S. Biomechanics of Femoral Neck Fractures and Implications for Fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:S27–32.
Kloen P, Rubel IF, Lyden JP, Helfet DL. Subtrochanteric fracture after cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures: a report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(3):225.
Hickey B, Jones HM, Jones S. Is distal screw entry point associated with subtrochanteric fracture after intracapsular hip fracture fixation? ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(4):245–8.
Crump EK, Quacinella M, Deafenbaugh BK. Does Screw Location Affect the Risk of Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture After Femoral Neck Fixation? A Biomechanical Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(4):770–6.
Davidson A, Blum S, Harats E, Kachko E, Essa A, Efraty R, Peyser A, Giannoudis PV. Neck of femur fractures treated with the femoral neck system: outcomes of one hundred and two patients and literature review. Int Orthop. 2022;46(9):2105–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05414-0. Epub 2022 May 11. PMID: 35538322; PMCID: PMC9372123.
Jiang J, Chen J, Xing F, Liu H, Xiang Z. Comparison of femoral neck system versus cannulated screws for treatment of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06378-x. PMID:37055749;PMCID:PMC10099821.
Rajnish RK, Srivastava A, Rathod PM, Haq RU, Aggarwal S, Kumar P, Dhammi IK, Dadra A. Does the femoral neck system provide better outcomes compared to cannulated screw fixation for the management of femoral neck fractures in young adults? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. J Orthop. 2022;11(32):52–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2022.05.007. PMID:35601207;PMCID:PMC9118353.
No funding declared.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was deemed exempt by institutional IRB. Consent was not obtained for this retrospective case series as there are no patient identifiers and includes only radiographs.
Consent to publication
Consent for publication- written informed consent for publication was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, J.C., Gerzina, C., Rush, K. et al. Subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck system of femoral neck fractures: a report of four cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 749 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06872-2