Skip to main content

Diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus by high-frequency ultrasonography

Abstract

Background

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus (BP) is difficult to diagnosis. This study aimed to summarize the features of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus observed on high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS).

Methods

The ultrasound data of 27 patients who had TOS with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus were collected and eventually confirmed by surgery. The imaging data were compared, and the pathogenesis of TOS was analyzed on the basis of surgical data.

Results

TOS occurred predominantly in females (70.4%). Most cases had unilateral involvement (92.6%), mainly on the right side (66.7%). The HFUS features of TOS can be summarized as follows: (1) Lower trunk compression. HFUS revealed focal thinning that reflected compression at the level of the lower trunk; furthermore, the distal part of the nerve was thickened for edema (Affected side: 0.49 ± 0.12 cm vs. Healthy side: 0.38 ± 0.06, P = 0.009), and the cross-sectional area of brachial plexus cords was markedly greater on the injured side than on the healthy side (0.95 ± 0.08 cm² vs. 0.65 ± 0.11 cm², P = 0.004). (2) Hyperechoic fibromuscular bands behind the compressed nerve (mostly the scalenus minimus muscle). (3) Abnormal bony structures: cervical ribs or elongated transverse processes of the 7th cervical vertebra (C7). Surgical results showed that the etiological factors contributing to TOS were (1) muscle hypertrophy and/or fibrosis (100%) and (2) cervical ribs/elongated C7 transverse processes (20.7%).

Conclusion

TOS with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus can be diagnosed accurately and reliably by high-frequency ultrasound.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of diverse disorders involving compression of the nerves and/or blood vessels in the thoracic outlet region, including the subclavian artery, subclavian vein and trunks of the brachial plexus [1, 2]. TOS is subdivided into neurogenic, arterial, or venous TOS based on the compressed structure, in which neurogenic TOS accounts for approximately 90% of cases. Neurogenic TOS is mainly caused by the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus (the C8/T1 roots) [3]; patients may experience pain, numbness, paresthesia, and motor weakness [4]. The insidious onset and slow progression of symptoms usually result in delayed diagnosis.

At present, the diagnosis of TOS with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus commonly relies on electromyography (EMG), CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in addition to medical history and clinical examinations. However, EMG cannot provide anatomical information regarding nerves and surrounding tissues, and the examination results are also affected by various factors [5]. Some authors state that CT scans can identify abnormalities in 30 to 60% of cases [6], but TOS caused by soft tissue is difficult to diagnose with CT. MRI is of value for the diagnosis of TOS: it identified a structure potentially responsible for TOS in 71% of the patients; was capable for hypertrophy of the anterior scalene muscle (81%) and for diagnosing a cervical rib (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity); but it is time consuming and costly [7]. An alternative is high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS), a valuable technology that has long been applied for the assessment of superficial organs, tissues, and blood vessels, and it has also been applied recently to assess nerves [8, 9]. Previous studies on ultrasonic imaging of TOS are scarce and do not report complete surgical outcomes [10, 11]; furthermore, TOS is often missed or diagnosed as cervical spondylosis, inflammatory neuropathy and cubital tunnel syndrome. The aim of the present retrospective study was to summarize the ultrasound characteristics of TOS with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus to provide references for TOS diagnosis.

Methods

Study subjects

From January 2011 to December 2021, 27 patients (29 sides, with 2 patients having bilateral lesions) presented with TOS involving the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus (19 females and 8 males). The patients were referred to the clinic because of hand and/or upper arm numbness and/or muscle atrophy. All patients underwent high-resolution ultrasound neurography, eighteen patients underwent EMG, and sixteen patients also underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning. The average age was 34.67 ± 14.20 years (13 to 68 years). All 27 participants were surgically confirmed to have TOS.

Equipment and methods

A GE Logiq E11 ultrasound system with a 6–15 MHz linear array transducer (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) was used for HFUS. Ultrasonography was performed by two experienced sonographers (Dingzhang Chen, Minjuan Zheng). The subjects lay in a supine position and had both sides of the neck examined, and cross sectional imaging was also scanned for abduction of the arm in sitting position. Using the C7 vertebra (C7 is unique because it has a posterior tubercle only and can easily be found) as the positioning marker, the sonographers observed and recorded the continuity, size, morphology and echogenicity of the nerve roots (C5, C6, C7, C8, T1) and nerve trunks (upper, middle, and lower trunks). The subclavian artery (SCA) was identified, and the size of the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular area was evaluated. The morphology and echo characteristics of important anatomical structures, such as the subclavian artery, the transverse processes of the cervical vertebrae, and the muscles around the brachial plexus, were also observed.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using statistical software (SPSS for Windows, version 21.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables are expressed as percentages. The variables were compared using the t test or Fisher’s exact test. Probability (p) values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Clinical features of TOS

TOS occurred predominantly in females (70.4%, 19/27). Most cases were located unilaterally (92.6%, 25/27), mainly on the right side (right: 66.7%, 18/27 vs. left: 33.3%, 9/27, P = 0.029). Most patients had upper limb numbness (79.3%) and muscle atrophy (75.9%) as symptoms. Upon clinical evaluation, TOS was often manifested as isolated finger weakness (75.9%), Froment’s sign (51.7%), a positive supraclavicular Tinel sign (41.4%), or a positive Adson (37.9%) or Wright (34.5%) test. EMG often showed neurogenic injury of the upper extremity involving 77.8% (14/18) of the lower trunk, and CT/X-ray diagnosis revealed that 31.3% (5/16) of the patients had an elongated C7 transverse process/cervical rib (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical and ultrasound features of TOS (lesion location, 27 patients, n = 29 sides)

Ultrasonographic features of TOS

The HFUS imaging characteristics of TOS with a compressed lower trunk of the brachial plexus can be summarized as follows: (1) Lower trunk compression. HFUS showed focal thinning at the level of lower trunk due to compression. Additionally, the distal nerve was thickened for edema (Affected side: 0.49 ± 0.12 cm vs. Healthy side: 0.38 ± 0.06, P = 0.009, Fig. 1A and D), and the cross-sectional area of the brachial plexus cords was markedly greater on the injured side than on the healthy side (0.95 ± 0.08 cm² vs. 0.65 ± 0.11 cm², P = 0.004, Fig. 1B and C). (2) Hyperechoic fibromuscular bands (mostly in the scalenus minimus muscle) behind the compressed nerve (Fig. 1E). (3) Abnormal bony structures: cervical ribs and elongated C7 transverse processes. HFUS showed hyperechoic bony structures with abnormal protrusions and shadows behind the deep surface of the compressed nerve root.

Fig. 1
figure 1

HFUS and CT images of TOS with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus

A. Anatomical diagram of the lower trunk of the brachial plexus

B and C. A cross-sectional view showed that the area of the brachial plexus trunk was larger on the injured side (C) than on the normal side (B)

D. Longitudinal view of the compressed LT and the compression caused by the MS.

E. Short-axis view showing LT compression caused by the SM.

F. X-ray image showing the cervical rib (arrow)

BP, brachial plexus; LT, lower trunk, AS, anterior scalene muscle; SM, scalenus minimus muscle; MS, middle scalene muscle; SCA, subclavian artery

Surgical results

Surgical results confirmed that the etiological factors of TOS were as follows: (1) Hypertrophy and/or fibrosis were present in the anterior and middle scalene muscles (23 sides, 79.3%), or hypertrophy, fibrosis, and/or bowstring-like changes were present in the scalenus minimus muscle (6 sides, 20.7%) (Figs. 1D and E and 2). (2) Cervical ribs/elongated C7 transverse processes were present. In total, there were 6 cases of cervical ribs and 3 cases of elongated C7 transverse processes (Fig. 1F).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Intraoperative view of TOS with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus

A. Right thenar muscle atrophy

B. Intraoperative image showing the brachial plexus (UT, MT, LT) and SCA.

C. Intraoperative image showing hypertrophy and/or fibrosis (arrow) of the SM.

D. Intraoperative image showing that the SM has been cut to release the LT. UT, upper trunk

MT, middle trunk; LT, lower trunk; SM, scalenus minimus muscle; SCA, subclavian artery

Discussion

TOS is difficult to diagnose, and the current approach to clinical diagnosis mainly relies on physical examination. Both the literature and our own experience demonstrate that HFUS is safe, inexpensive, readily available, and widely used in the evaluation of the perineural environment, fascicular echostructure, and nerve diameter, which are particularly valuable in the diagnosis and treatment of nerve tumors, compressive lesions, and nerve trauma [9, 10, 12,13,14]. However, there are few reports on TOS with compression of the brachial plexus in the existing literature. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the ultrasonographic features of TOS with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus and preliminarily explore the diagnostic value of ultrasound in such diseases.

According to our data, TOS with a compressed lower trunk of the brachial plexus occurred predominantly in females (70.4%) and was usually unilateral (92.6%), with preferential involvement of the right arm (66.7%). This spatial distribution might be associated with the high prevalence of right-handedness, and risk factors might include repetitive movements and certain working positions, particularly in occupations requiring the use of the arms at an elevated angle (barbers, switchboard operators, assembly line workers, etc.) [6]. About 1–5% TOS patients accompanied subclavian artery stenosis in some severe cases [15, 16], but this phenomenon didn’t appear in our study.

HFUS plays an important role in the dynamic diagnosis of TOS and provides valuable information for clinical strategies. For patients with TOS involving the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus, successful surgery requires a thorough search for abnormal nerve morphology and any lesions in the perineural environment that are responsible for compression; preoperative positioning is also crucial [17]. In this study, the observed abnormalities in nerve morphology included focal thinning at the point of lower trunk compression and prominent thickening of the nerve (0.49 ± 0.12 cm) distal to the compression site, with an increase in the cross-sectional area of the nerve cords (affected side: 0.95 ± 0.08 cm²; healthy side: 0.65 ± 0.11 cm², P = 0.004). The perineural environment contained hyperechoic fibromuscular bands (mostly in the scalenus minimus muscle) behind the compressed nerve, and abnormal bony structures (cervical ribs and elongated C7 transverse processes) were also observed. However, hypertrophy or fibrosis of the scalenus minimus muscle could be found only in some patients, and this muscle was difficult to distinguish from the middle scalene muscle by HFUS. Arányi et al. [10]. identified a hyperechoic fibromuscular structure at the medial edge of the middle scalene muscle, which indented the lower trunk of the brachial plexus (‘‘wedge-sickle sign’’), would consistent with the structure of the scalene minimus muscle. C7 has only a posterior tubercle, makes the C7 transverse processes easy to identify [8]. If abnormal bony structures are seen along the deep surface of the nerve root, they should be noted.

On the basis of the surgical results, we found that the main etiological factor of TOS was muscle hypertrophy and/or fibrosis, with hypertrophy and/or fibrosis of the anterior or middle scalene muscle accounting for 79.3% of cases. We have observed that most TOS patients have relatively long necks [18]. The anterior and middle scalene muscles are prone to fibrosis when stretched for a long time; the fibrotic muscles, like a pair of scissors, would clamp the brachial plexus and especially the lower trunk where it passes between them. Preoperative HFUS showed that the cross-sectional area of the brachial plexus was greater on the lesion side than on the healthy side, and the lower trunk nerve was locally thickened, confirming the existence of lower trunk compression. Compression is often relieved surgically by cutting the anterior scalene muscle. Another important etiology of TOS is hypertrophy and/or fibrosis of the scalenus minimus muscle, which is a separate fibrous band, often arises from seventh and/or sixth cervical vertebrae and insert to the first rib, and occurs in 71.7% of TOS patients [19]. This population often combine with cervical ribs or elongated C7 transverse processes, which change the shape of the scalenus minimus muscle (in our patients, mostly behind the subclavian artery and the lower trunk of the brachial plexus), elevate the lower trunk, and cause the nerve to be compressed against the anterior scalene muscle. This type of compression is often relieved surgically by cutting the anterior scalene muscle and scalenus minimus muscle.

Limitations

There are limitations to this study. For example, the total sample size was small, at 27 subjects. In addition, some patients did not undergo CT examination, and electromyography was performed in only 18 cases. Furthermore, postoperative follow-up data were not collected.

Conclusion

HFUS is valuable for TOS diagnosis because it reflects both the morphology and the location of brachial plexus lesions and can detect muscular or bony factors causing nerve compression, providing important information for clinical treatment and postoperative follow-up.

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request via open or restricted access through a strict controlled access procedure request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

TOS:

Thoracic outlet syndrome

BP:

brachial plexus

HFUS:

high-frequency ultrasonography

AS:

anterior scalene muscle

SM:

scalenus minimus muscle

MS:

middle scalene muscle

SCA:

subclavian artery

MT:

middle trunk

LT:

lower trunk

CT:

computed tomography

SD:

standard deviation

References

  1. Kuhn JE, Lebus VG, Bible JE. Thoracic outlet syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(4):222–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nayak SB. Thoracic inlet or thoracic outlet: which one is which in anatomical and clinical literature? Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(2):167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Le Forestier N, Mouton P, Maisonobe T, et al. True neurological thoracic outlet syndrome. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2000;156(1):34–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang MC, Kim DH. Essentials of thoracic outlet syndrome: a narrative review. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(21):5804–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mul K, Pesser N, Vervaart K, et al. Variability in electrodiagnostic findings associated with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2022;65(1):34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laulan J, Fouquet B, Rodaix C, et al. Thoracic outlet syndrome: definition, aetiological factors, diagnosis, management and occupational impact. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):366–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardy A, Pougès C, Wavreille G, Behal H, Demondion X, Lefebvre G. Thoracic outlet syndrome: diagnostic accuracy of MRI. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(8):1563–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen DZM. Ultrasonography diagnosis of peripheral nerves: cases and illustrations. Singapore: Springer; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Holzgrefe RE, Wagner ER, Singer AD, et al. Imaging of the Peripheral nerve: concepts and future direction of magnetic resonance neurography and Ultrasound. J Hand Surg Am. 2019;44(12):1066–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aranyi Z, Csillik A, Bohm J, et al. Ultrasonographic Identification of Fibromuscular bands Associated with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: the “Wedge-Sickle” sign. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42(10):2357–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jengojan S, Bernathova M, Moritz T, et al. High-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of abnormal ligaments in thoracic outlet syndrome in a series of 16 cases. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:817337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong W, Wang J, Huang L, et al. Diagnosis of cervical plexus tumours by high-frequency ultrasonography. BMC Med Imaging. 2021;21(1):148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng M, Zhu Y, Zhou X, et al. Diagnosis of closed injury and neoplasm of the brachial plexus by ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014;42(7):417–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu YS, Mu NN, Zheng MJ, et al. High-resolution ultrasonography for the diagnosis of brachial plexus root lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40(7):1420–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Panther EJ, Reintgen CD, Cueto RJ, Hao KA, Chim H, King JJ. Thoracic outlet syndrome: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(11):e545–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farina R, Foti PV, Conti A, Iannace FA, Pennisi I, Fanzone L, Inì C, Libra F, Vacirca F, Failla G, Baldanza D, Palmucci S, Santonocito S, Basile A. The role of ultrasound imaging in vascular compression syndromes. Ultrasound J. 2021;13(1):4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohana M, Moser T, Moussaoui A, et al. Current and future imaging of the peripheral nervous system. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014;95(1):17–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klaassen Z, Sorenson E, Tubbs RS, et al. Thoracic outlet syndrome: a neurological and vascular disorder. Clin Anat. 2014;27(5):724–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Natsis K, Totlis T, Didagelos M, et al. Scalenus minimus muscle: overestimated or not? An anatomical study. Am Surg. 2013;79(4):372–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2022KWZ-19), and Science and Technology Plan Project of Xi’an (Grant No. 21YXYJ0105), Military Medicine Research and Clinical Application of the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University (Grant No. JSYXM26).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors conceived and designed the study. Dingzhang Chen and Wenqing Gong carried out the studies, participated in collecting data and drafted the manuscript. Jing Wang and Jikun Hao prepared figures and table. Minjuan Zheng and Rui Zhao had revised the part of discussion. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the final version of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minjuan Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The design and protocol of this retrospective study were approved by the Ethics Committee of Xijing Hospital (KY20162034-1). All methods in the study were carried out in accordance with the Helsinki guidelines and declaration. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, D., Gong, W., Wang, J. et al. Diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome with the lower trunk compression of brachial plexus by high-frequency ultrasonography. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 690 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06762-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06762-7

Keywords