Skip to main content

The Skeletal Oncology Research Group Machine Learning Algorithm (SORG-MLA) for predicting prolonged postoperative opioid prescription after total knee arthroplasty: an international validation study using 3,495 patients from a Taiwanese cohort

Abstract

Background

Preoperative prediction of prolonged postoperative opioid use (PPOU) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could identify high-risk patients for increased surveillance. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine learning algorithm (SORG-MLA) has been tested internally while lacking external support to assess its generalizability. The aims of this study were to externally validate this algorithm in an Asian cohort and to identify other potential independent factors for PPOU.

Methods

In a tertiary center in Taiwan, 3,495 patients receiving TKA from 2010–2018 were included. Baseline characteristics were compared between the external validation cohort and the original developmental cohorts. Discrimination (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] and precision-recall curve [AUPRC]), calibration, overall performance (Brier score), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to assess the model performance. A multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate other potential prognostic factors.

Results

There were notable differences in baseline characteristics between the validation and the development cohort. Despite these variations, the SORG-MLA (https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/tjaopioid/) remained its good discriminatory ability (AUROC, 0.75; AUPRC, 0.34) and good overall performance (Brier score, 0.029; null model Brier score, 0.032). The algorithm could bring clinical benefit in DCA while somewhat overestimating the probability of prolonged opioid use. Preoperative acetaminophen use was an independent factor to predict PPOU (odds ratio, 2.05).

Conclusions

The SORG-MLA retained its discriminatory ability and good overall performance despite the different pharmaceutical regulations. The algorithm could be used to identify high-risk patients and tailor personalized prevention policy.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the definitive treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis [1], and the number of patients undergoing TKA is expected to increase substantially with the growing elderly population. In the United States, an estimated 14 million individuals aged 25 years and above manifest symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, and more than half of those diagnosed will undergo initial TKA surgery prior to their demise, accounting for over 600,000 TKAs conducted annually [2]. Although the satisfaction rate of TKA is relatively high [2], 60% of the patients suffer from severe postoperative knee pain after TKA and 30% of them described such pain as moderate [3]. This discomfort negatively affects early postoperative ambulation and rehabilitation; therefore, analgesics are commonly used for the patients’ better recovery. Patients who undergo TKA surgery are typically prescribed a two to three-week course of non-steroid anti-inflammation drugs (NSAIDs) as a conventional treatment for pain relief [4, 5]. However, chronic postoperative pain affects about 20% of TKA recipients, and NSAIDs provide an average pain reduction of approximately 25%. Moreover, individuals with contraindications like allergic reactions, treatment-resistant hypertension, increased cardiovascular disease risk, and severe chronic kidney disease may not be suitable candidates for NSAID treatment [5]. Therefore, opioids have been used as an important part of multimodal postoperative analgesic regimen. Bedard et al. posited that roughly one-third of patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had utilized opioids in the three-month period leading up to the surgical intervention [6]. However, their use is unfavorably associated with postoperative comorbidities, such as prolonged hospitalization, greater costs, and increased readmissions [7]. Therefore, a customized opioid prescription for these patients would be valuable.

Several risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid use (PPOU) have already been identified, including preoperative opioid use, female gender, patients aged < 50 years, greater length of stay, and worse health status [6], however, amongst them are complex interactions. The machine learning algorithm offers flexible estimations and would help to establish a preoperative prediction of opioid use after the surgery [8, 9]. Katakam et al. developed the Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine learning algorithm (SORG-MLA) to predict PPOU after TKA in the United States. The algorithm was trained on a dataset of 12,542 institutional patients, and was successfully tested in the internal validation [8]. However, international variations about medical philosophies and pharmacy-restrictions would bias the abroad application of this algorithm [9]. An external validation in a geographically distant cohort with significant medicolegal and cultural differences is thus necessary.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) recommended the preoperative use of acetaminophen in 2021 [10]. Acetaminophen provides pain relief for patients with a lower risk of acute kidney injury or gastrointestinal side effects compared to NSAIDs. However, there have been reports associating the preoperative use of acetaminophen with postoperative opioid use (PPOU) [11]. The developmental study of SORG-MLA, which did not incorporate the preoperative use of acetaminophen, was possibly conducted before the AAOS recommendation for this medication. It would be interesting to investigate whether the performance of SORG-MLA could be improved by including acetaminophen as a potential prediction factor.

Together, this study aimed to answer the following two questions. (1) Was the SORG-MLA for predicting PPOU after TKA generalizable, measured by area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) as well as other performance metrics, to a geographically, socioeconomically distinct cohort? (2) Is preoperative acetaminophen use an independent factor associated with PPOU while controlling for the SORG-MLA predictions?

Material and methods

Guideline

This retrospective validation study was performed under the guidance of the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement [12]. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the authors’ hospital (Case Number 202106028RINA), and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Study design

A retrospective study was conducted at this single tertiary health care system in Taiwan. Inclusion criteria for the study-subjects were: (1) age 20 years or older, (2) indicated for operation of knee osteoarthritis, and (3) receiving primary elective TKA during January 1st 2010 to December 31st 2018. Exclusion criteria were those received: (1) revision TKA and (2) TKA performed for inflammatory arthritis, trauma, tumor, or infection (Fig. 1). The same criteria were used as the development cohort except for age, because the patients aged 18 to 20 years were excluded by the Research Ethics Committee’s regulation in this incidence due to that they are legally minor. Such exclusion has not affected our final analysis because knee osteoarthritis is primarily degenerative in nature and less than 0.1% of our patients were younger than 30-year-old at the time of the surgery.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flowchart showing the enrolled patients in the validation cohort. TKA, total knee arthroplasty

Outcome

PPOU were defined as the presence of continuous opioid prescriptions within three specific time intervals following the index surgery: first 30 days, 30–90 days, and 90–180 days after surgery [13]. The complete list of opioid medications is referred to the development study [8]. The complete list of opioid medications is referred to the development study [8].

Development cohort

In the developmental study, 12,542 patients underwent TKA for osteoarthritis and 1125 (9.0%) received prolonged postoperative opioid prescriptions. The median age was 67 years (interquartile range 60–74) and 7559 (60.3%) patients were female. In the year before surgery, 2631 (21.0%) patients received opioid prescription. The other most prescribed medicines preoperatively were NSAIDs (n = 2164, 17.3%), beta-blocker (n = 1742, 13.9%), and immunosuppressant (n = 1431, 11.4%). The most prevalent comorbidities were arrhythmias (n = 1506, 12.0%), followed by diabetes (n = 1182, 9.4%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 936, 7.5%) [8].

Data collection and predictors

The following variables were manually retrieved from the medical records: patient demographics (age, sex, marital status, ethnicity), disposition (inpatient or outpatient), preoperative laboratory values (white blood cell count, hemoglobin, platelet count, creatinine, alanine transaminase [ALT]), neighborhood characteristics from Taiwan National Department of Household Registration online database based on patient’s living area zip code (median household income, educational level, median age, neighborhood unemployment rate, population density), preoperative medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, acetaminophen, angiotensin II receptor blocker, anti-depressants, beta-2 agonists, beta-blockers, benzodiazepines, gabapentin and pregabalin, immunosuppressants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioid, anti-psychotics), and preoperative comorbidities (tobacco use, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, diabetes, renal failure, depression, psychoses, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular accidents, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arrhythmias, valvular disease, liver disease, malignancy). The same definitions for outcome and predictor variables were used as the original development study [8]. The authors of the development study were not part of the data extraction or analysis. The same definitions for outcome and predictor variables were used as the original development study [8]. The authors of the development study were not part of the data extraction or analysis.

The SORG-MLA used nine variables to provide a prediction of PPOU: age, history of preoperative opioid use, marital status, diagnosis of diabetes, and preoperative medications (antidepressants, benzodiazepines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentin, and beta-2 agonists). An example of an individual patient-level explanation for the model predictions is shown in Fig. 2. The predicted probability of PPOU was 0.25 for a 65-year-old patient with diabetes and a history of opioid use and NSAID use. We provided an easy step-by-step guide, using a dummy dataset, for validation of open accessible prediction models (Additional file 1). This flow-chart as well as the open-source code may help the other studies to implement the external validation of prediction models.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Patient-specific explanation for prediction generated by the online SORG-MLA model at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/tjaopioid/

Missing data

The proportions of missing data were all less than 30% [14], and the MissForest algorithm was applied to impute the missing data for the following variables: unemployment rate in 25 patients (0.7%); neighborhood characteristics in 7 patients (0.2%); creatinine in 4 patients (0.11%); hemoglobin in 2 patients (0.06%); white blood cell in 1 patient (0.03%); and platelet in 1 patient (0.03%). The outcome of interest could be retrieved through the database of the National Health Insurance registry and no opioid drugs could be obtained without prescriptions; therefore, the missing proportion of PPOU was regarded as none. The proportions of missing data were all less than 30% [14], and the MissForest algorithm was applied to impute the missing data for the following variables: unemployment rate in 25 patients (0.7%); neighborhood characteristics in 7 patients (0.2%); creatinine in 4 patients (0.11%); hemoglobin in 2 patients (0.06%); white blood cell in 1 patient (0.03%); and platelet in 1 patient (0.03%). The outcome of interest could be retrieved through the database of the National Health Insurance registry and no opioid drugs could be obtained without prescriptions; therefore, the missing proportion of PPOU was regarded as none.

A sensitivity test was conducted by using only individuals who have no missing data, and the result was similar to the one with imputation of missing data.

Participants’ baseline characteristics

In total, 3,495 patients were included in this study and 114 (3.3%) among them received PPOU. 2,687 (77%) patients were female with a median age of 73 (interquartile range [IQR], 67 to 78) years. The most prescribed medicines preoperatively were NSAIDs (n = 3,453, 99%), followed by ARBs (n = 779, 22%) and beta-blockers (n = 607, 17%). The patients in the developmental and the validation cohorts differed in many regards. Generally, patients in the validation cohort were older, married more often, earned less money, had more inpatient dispositions, had less depression or drug abuse as the comorbidities, and had a more common pharmaceutical history of taking NSAIDs, angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blockers, benzodiazepines, gabapentin, and anti-psychotics (Table 1). Slightly more than one-tenth of the patients (n = 422, 12%) had been prescribed with acetaminophen. The comparison of baseline characteristics between patients with and without PPOU is presented in Table 2. Additionally, all patients in the validation cohort were covered by the National Health Insurance whereas the patients in developmental cohorts in the US usually pertained to various insurances.

Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the development cohort (n = 12,542) and the external validation cohort (n = 3,495)
Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics between patients with and without prolonged postoperative opioid used

Statistical analysis

All predictions were retrieved from the online application at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/tjaopioid/. Baseline characteristics were compared between the two cohorts: one representing the validation cohort in Taiwan, and another representing the development cohort from Katakam et al. in the US. For continuous variables, one-way median tests were conducted, while the chi-square tests were performed for categorical variables. The discrimination as being measured by the area under the receiver characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), the calibration, the Brier score for overall performance, and the decision curve analysis were applied to evaluate the performance of SORG-MLA. The detailed explanation of the applied performance methods was provided in Additional file 1 [15]. The detailed explanation of the applied performance methods was provided in Additional file 1 [15]. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to incorporate the serum ALT level into the model of SORG-MLA while examining the preoperative use of acetaminophen as a predictor for PPOU. The rationale behind incorporating serum ALT level in the analysis was that some patients with compromised liver function were not prescribed acetaminophen due to concerns about its hepatotoxicity, particularly considering the high prevalence of hepatitis B and C in Taiwan [16, 17]. The multivariable logistic regression results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Was the SORG-MLA for predicting PPOU after TKA generalizable, measured by AUPRC as well as other performance metrics, to a geographically, socioeconomically distinct cohort?

The algorithm achieved an AUROC of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.81; Fig. 3A and Table 3) and AUPRC of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.52; Fig. 3B) on external validation. It overestimated the observed proportion of patients with sustained opioid prescription, as being shown by the negative calibration intercept of -0.82 (95% CI, -1.01 to -0.63; Fig. 4A) with a calibration slope of 1.49 (95% CI, 1.25 to 1.73). The actual rate of PPOU was significantly lower than the rate predicted by SORG-MLA (3.3% versus 6.9%; one-sample t-test, p < 0.05). The raw Brier score was 0.029 compared to the score of 0.032 in the null model. The decision curve representing the SORG-MLA was, in a wide range of threshold probabilities, above the other two curves representing two default strategies of changing managements did, either for all patients or for no patients (Fig. 4B). These results indicate the algorithm could bring net benefit, compared to the two strategies, in a wide variety of clinical scenarios.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Area under A the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and B precision-recall curve (AUPRC) for SORG-MLA model

Table 3 Performance metrics of development cohort and external validation cohort
Fig. 4
figure 4

A Calibration plot and B decision curve analysis with standardized net benefit by threshold probability for SORG-MLA model

Is preoperative acetaminophen use an independent factor associated with PPOU while controlling for the SORG-MLA predictions?

Among 422 patients taking acetaminophen preoperatively, 23 were found to have prolonged postoperative opioid use, while 91 out of 3,073 patients not taking acetaminophen had PPOU. In univariate analysis, patients taking acetaminophen preoperatively tended to depend on a more prolonged use of opioids for postoperative pain (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.97). In the multivariable analysis, which adjusted for SORG-MLA predictions and the patient’s serum ALT level, such trend remained significant (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.82).

Discussion

An accurate prediction of the risk of PPOU could facilitate clinical decisions to avoid excessive use of opioids and the subsequent adverse events. The SORG-MLA was developed to predict patient-specific risks on PPOU after TKA [8]. Although the algorithm has been internally validated, its generality remains questionable and requires the validations with diverse, external cohorts according to the suggestion in the TRIPOD guidelines. The SORG-MLA was developed to predict patient-specific risks on PPOU after TKA [8]. Although the algorithm has been internally validated, its generality remains questionable and requires validations with diverse, external cohorts according to the suggestion in the TRIPOD guidelines [12]. In this study, we validated the algorithm with a geographically, socioeconomically distinct cohort and found it held good discriminatory ability and overall performance, except the model had a tendency to overestimate the probability of PPOU. We also reported an AUPRC of 0.34, indicating a minimal concern about the excessive optimism on the algorithm’s discriminatory ability [18]. Also, the model could be improved upon by incorporating preoperative acetaminophen use as a risk factor.

Limitations

There are several limitations in this study. First, this was a single-center retrospective study that might not be adequately representative to other global districts or human subjects [19,20,21]. Some potential selection biases could not be avoided. Second, the time-period of this study (2010–2018) was different from that of the developmental cohort (2000–2018). Because both the physicians and the patients have recently become more alert to the PPOU [22], the historical background between the two cohorts might be different. Third, there are major differences in pharmaceutical regulation and prescription philosophy between the two countries [23]. Despite the historical and legislative differences, the algorithm has held its good discriminatory ability and overall performance as being successfully tested by decision curve analysis in our geographically distinct cohort [22, 22]. The difference in PPOU between both cohorts could be influenced by various factors including pharmaceutical philosophy, legal regulations, and socioeconomic factors. Therefore, the importance of an external validation study with a distance cohort could not be over-emphasized. Opioid prescriptions may vary internationally and even domestically [24, 25]. Opioid prescriptions may vary internationally and even domestically [24, 25]. For instance, the prescription of opioids in Taiwan is strictly regulated by the local Food and Drug Administration. The prescriptions for strong oral opioids, such as morphine and oxycodone, are strongly discouraged for non-cancer patients. The physicians who prescribe long term opioids are mandated to submit clinical report-forms quarterly. These country-wise differences may lead to different patterns of analgesics-usage. Almost all patients in our validation cohort were prescribed with NSAIDs as the first-line non-surgical treatments, compared with 17% in the developmental cohort. Furthermore, only 10% patients in our cohort had received preoperative opioids, whereas twice as many (21%) patients in the US cohort had done so. The preoperative use of opioids and NSAIDs have been determined as the 1st and the 6th most important factors, respectively, to predict PPOU after TKA [8]. Remarkably, despite of these distinct differences in the two important variables at baseline, the SORG-MLA was still capable of maintaining good discrimination and overall performance [8]. Inflammation is a closely integrated processes in knee osteoarthritis and may affect disease progression and pain [26]. Several cytokines, such as prostaglandin E2, played indispensable roles in the degeneration and inflammation course [27]. Therefore, the use of oral NSAIDs, an anti-inflammation and an analgesic agents work by inhibiting the activity of cyclooxygenase enzymes, were recommended in the 2010s for patients with knee osteoarthritis [28]. Inflammation are closely integrated processes in knee osteoarthritis and may affect disease progression and pain [26]. Several cytokines, such as prostaglandin E2, played indispensable roles in the degeneration and inflammation course [27]. Therefore, the use of oral NSAIDs, an anti-inflammation and analgesic agents work by inhibiting the activity of cyclooxygenase enzymes, was recommended in the 2010s for patients with knee osteoarthritis [28]. In contrast, the use of acetaminophen was inconclusively recommended by the AAOS in that time. This recommendation was not affirmed until 2021 by its third edition treatment guideline, possibly since acetaminophen was less efficacious than NSAIDs. We found NSAIDs to be the most commonly used medication in our validation-cohort and the second most used in the developmental cohort, possibly because of following these recommendations. In contrast, the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) has recommended oral NSAIDs only if acetaminophen or topical NSAIDs provide unsatisfactory relief of symptoms [29]. The discrepancy between the two academies might indicate a different pharmaceutical philosophy across the Atlantic Ocean. The authors of the developmental study have practiced in the US and may have ignored the preoperative use of acetaminophen by their patients as a risk factor. On the other hand, such risk has been identified in some previous studies [11], and the postoperative use of acetaminophen has been considered a protective factor [30]. The geographic discrepancy should also highlight the importance of an external validation study to test the generalizability in this case [31]. The geographic discrepancy should also highlight the importance of an external validation study to test the generalizability in this case [31].

In this study, we demonstrated that the preoperative use of acetaminophen was an independent risk factor while controlling for the SORG-MLA prediction and the patients’ serum ALT level. Considering the notorious hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen [32], we felt obligated to include the serum ALT level, serving as a surrogate of hepatic function, in our multivariable analysis to provide a more reliable prognostic estimation. Considering the notorious hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen [32], we felt obligated to include the serum ALT level, serving as a surrogate of hepatic function, in our multivariable analysis to provide a more reliable prognostic estimation. The results suggested that the SORG-MLA could be further improved by considering the incremental factor. Unfortunately, in this study, we failed to retrain the SORG-MLA to provide a more comprehensive evaluation by adding the medication use as a new prognostic factor. In order to avoid over-fitting and to provide a more generalizable prediction, we should retrain the model with both the American and Taiwanese cohorts. However, for security and ethical reasons, sharing such big data from two countries mandated complicated processes and considerable time as long as several months for application. Therefore, we finally decided to report our preliminary findings and hoped the results could inspire more related studies. Future research are needed to investigate the effects of additional predictive factors such as the uses of pharmaceutical grade glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate, and to develop or retrain a prediction model to provide more personalized prediction [29].

Conclusions

Despite different baseline characteristics and pharmaceutical regulations, the SORG-MLA for PPOU after TKA held good discriminative abilities and good overall performance in a geographically distinct region. The physicians in Taiwan could adopt this algorithm to identify high-risk patients before TKA surgeries and to tailor individualized preventive strategies for postoperative pain-control. The trend between preoperative acetaminophen uses and PPOU indicates that acetaminophen may be a risk factor for an extended postoperative opioid use. It also highlights the importance of investigating additional factors to further improve prediction models to get more personalized PPOU prediction.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PPOU:

Prolonged postoperative opioid use

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

SORG-MLA:

Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine learning algorithm

AUROC:

Area under receiver operating characteristic curve

AUPRC:

Area under precision-recall curve

DCA:

Decision curve analysis

AAOS:

Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

NSAIDS:

Non-steroid anti-inflammation drugs

TRIPOD:

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

ORs:

Odds ratios

CIs:

Confidence intervals

IQR:

Interquartile range

ESCEO:

European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases

References

  1. McGrory BJ, Weber KL, Jevsevar DS, Sevarino K. Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Evidence-based Guideline. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(8):e87-93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chrenka EA, Solberg LI, Asche SE, Dehmer SP, Ziegenfuss JY, Whitebird RR, Norton CK, Reams M, Johnson PG, Elwyn G. Is Shared Decision-making Associated with Better Patient-reported Outcomes? A Longitudinal Study of Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(1):82–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li JW, Ma YS, Xiao LK. Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(5):755–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhuang Q, Tao L, Lin J, Jin J, Qian W, Bian Y, Li Y, Dong Y, Peng H, Li Y, et al. Postoperative intravenous parecoxib sodium followed by oral celecoxib post total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients (PIPFORCE): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(1): e030501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Szeto CC, Sugano K, Wang JG, Fujimoto K, Whittle S, Modi GK, Chen CH, Park JB, Tam LS, Vareesangthip K, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy in patients with hypertension, cardiovascular, renal or gastrointestinal comorbidities: joint APAGE/APLAR/APSDE/APSH/APSN/PoA recommendations. Gut. 2020;69(4):617–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bedard NA, Pugely AJ, Westermann RW, Duchman KR, Glass NA, Callaghan JJ. Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Trends and Risk Factors for Prolonged Use. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(8):2390–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008;11(2 Suppl):S105-120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katakam A, Karhade AV, Schwab JH, Chen AF, Bedair HS. Development and validation of machine learning algorithms for postoperative opioid prescriptions after TKA. J Orthop. 2020;22:95–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahavard BB, Candido KD, Knezevic NN. Different pain responses to chronic and acute pain in various ethnic/racial groups. Pain Manag. 2017;7(5):427–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brophy RH, Fillingham YA: AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline Summary: Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Nonarthroplasty), Third Edition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022, 30(9):e721-e729.

  11. Rajamaki TJ, Puolakka PA, Hietaharju A, Moilanen T, Jamsen E. Predictors of the use of analgesic drugs 1 year after joint replacement: a single-center analysis of 13,000 hip and knee replacements. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015;350: g7594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, Moser S, Lin P, Englesbe MJ, Bohnert ASB, Kheterpal S, Nallamothu BK. New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(6): e170504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stekhoven DJ, Buhlmann P. MissForest–non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(1):112–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karhade AV, Schwab JH. CORR synthesis: when should we be skeptical of clinical prediction models? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(12):2722.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Larson AM. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Clin Liver Dis. 2007;11(3):525–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen CH, Yang PM, Huang GT, Lee HS, Sung JL, Sheu JC. Estimation of seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus in Taiwan from a large-scale survey of free hepatitis screening participants. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106(2):148–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozenne B, Subtil F, Maucort-Boulch D. The precision–recall curve overcame the optimism of the receiver operating characteristic curve in rare diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(8):855–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yen H-K, Ogink PT, Huang C-C, Groot OQ, Su C-C, Chen S-F, Chen C-W, Karhade AV, Peng K-P, Lin W-H: A machine learning algorithm for predicting prolonged postoperative opioid prescription after lumbar disc herniation surgery. An external validation study using 1,316 patients from a Taiwanese cohort. The Spine Journal 2022.

  20. Yang JJ, Chen CW, Fourman MS, Bongers MER, Karhade AV, Groot OQ, Lin WH, Yen HK, Huang PH, Yang SH et al: International External Validation of the SORG Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting 90-Day and 1-Year Survival of Patients with Spine Metastases using a Taiwanese Cohort. Spine J 2021.

  21. Hu M-H, Yen H-K, Chen I-H, Wu C-H, Chen C-W, Yang J-J, Wang Z-Y, Yen M-H, Yang S-H, Lin W-H: Decreased Psoas Muscle Area is a Prognosticator for 90-Day and 1-Year Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Spinal Metastasis. Clinical Nutrition 2022.

  22. Cho G, Chang VW. Trends in Prescription Opioid and Nonopioid Analgesic Use by Race, 1996–2017. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(3):422–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu CH, Liang PC, Hsu CH, Chang FT, Shao YY, Ting-Fang Shih T. Total skeletal, psoas and rectus abdominis muscle mass as prognostic factors for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120(1 Pt 2):559–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lipof JS, Thirukumaran CP, Greenstein AS, Zmich Z, Lander A, Ricciardi BF. Postdischarge opiate-prescribing habits for primary THA and TKA: a survey of American Association of Hip And Knee Surgeons Members. Orthopedics. 2019;42(6):361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hannon CP, Keating TC, Lange JK, Ricciardi BF, Waddell BS, Della Valle CJ: Anesthesia and analgesia practices in total joint arthroplasty: a survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons membership. The Journal of arthroplasty 2019, 34(12):2872–2877. e2872.

  26. Bonnet C, Walsh D. Osteoarthritis, angiogenesis and inflammation. Rheumatology. 2005;44(1):7–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Naumov A, Tkacheva O. Use of a glycosamine sulfate for patients with osteoarthritis and a comorbidity with high risk of the side effects from NSAIDS. Ter Arkh. 2018;90(5):81–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown GA: AAOS clinical practice guideline: treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013, 21(9):577–579.

  29. Arden NK, Perry TA, Bannuru RR, Bruyere O, Cooper C, Haugen IK, Hochberg MC, McAlindon TE, Mobasheri A, Reginster JY. Non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of ESCEO and OARSI 2019 guidelines. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(1):59–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lubis AM, Maruanaya S, Tantri AR, Pontoh LAP, Ifran N. The Use of Combination Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in Postoperative Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Physician. 2021;24(8):E1199–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KI, Debray TP, Altman DG, Moons KG, Collins GS: External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges. BMJ 2016, 353.

  32. Lancaster EM, Hiatt JR, Zarrinpar A. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity: an updated review. Arch Toxicol. 2015;89(2):193–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all healthcare professionals from various departments of National Taiwan University Hospital for their contribution in providing multidisciplinary care for our patients and the Department of Medical Research staff for gathering data from the institutional integrative medical database. We would also like to thank Professor Wen-Chung Lee (Department of Public Health, National Taiwan University) for his consultation regarding statistical methods employed in this study.

Funding

The authors report no funding disclosures for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ming-Hsiao Hu, Hong-Sen Chiang, Cheng-Chen Tsai and Chuan-Ching, Huang provided Conceptualization and Investigation. Cheng-Chen Tsai, Chuan-Ching, Huang, Ching-Wei Lin, and Chih-Chi Su wrote the main manuscript. Cheng-Chen Tsai, Chuan-Ching, Huang, Chih-Chi Su and Shin-Fu Chen prepared figures 1-4. Cheng-Chen Tsai, Chuan-Ching, Huang, Paul T. Ogink, Mao-Hsu Yen, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Joseph H. Schwab, Chen-Ti, Wang, Olivier Q. Groot, Ming-Hsiao Hu, Hong-Sen Chiang, prepared references, review. and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ming-Hsiao Hu or Hongsen Chiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work was performed in National Taiwan University Hospital using patient data from 2010–2018. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital (National Taiwan University Hospital Research Ethics Committee A, Case Number 202106028RINA), and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, CC., Huang, CC., Lin, CW. et al. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group Machine Learning Algorithm (SORG-MLA) for predicting prolonged postoperative opioid prescription after total knee arthroplasty: an international validation study using 3,495 patients from a Taiwanese cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 553 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06667-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06667-5

Keywords