Skip to main content
Download PDF

Intact revision rotator cuff repair stabilizes muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration after minimum follow up of two years

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 24, Article number: 515 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The extent of fatty infiltration and rotator cuff (RC) atrophy is crucial for the clinical results after rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in fatty infiltration and RC atrophy after revision RCR and to correlate them with functional outcome parameters.

Methods

Patients who underwent arthroscopic revision RCR for symptomatic recurrent full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon between 2008 and 2014 and were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum follow up of 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed pre- and postoperatively to assess 1) tendon integrity after revision RCR according to Sugaya classification, (2) RC atrophy according to Thomazeau classification, and (3) fatty infiltration according to Fuchs MRI classification. Constant score (CS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score were used to correlate functional outcome, tendon integrity, and muscle degeneration.

Results

19 patients (17 males and 2 females) with a mean age of 57.5 years (range, 34 to 72) were included into the study at a mean follow-up of 50.3 months (range, 24 – 101). At final evaluation, 9 patients (47%) presented with intact RCR and 10 patients (53%) suffered a re-tear after revision repair. No progress of fatty infiltration was observed postoperatively in the group with intact RC, atrophy progressed in only 1 out of 9 patient (11%). Fatty infiltration progressed in 5/10 patients (50%) and RC atrophy increased in 2/10 patients (20%) within the re-tear group. CS (42.7 ± 17.7 preop, 65.2 ± 20.1 postop) and ASES (47.7 ± 17.2 preop, 75.4 ± 23.7 postop) improved significantly from pre- to postoperatively (p < 0.001). A positive correlation between fatty infiltration and RC integrity was detected (r = 0.77, p < 0.01). No correlation between clinical outcome and tendon integrity or RC atrophy was observed.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic revision RCR leads to reliable functional outcomes even in case of a recurrent RC retear. An intact RCR maintains the preoperative state of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy but does not lead to muscle regeneration.

Level of evidence

Level IV; Therapeutic study.

Peer Review reports

Background

Full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears lead to tendon and muscle degeneration over time. The degeneration process includes retraction of the tendon as well as atrophy and fatty infiltration of the muscles [1, 2]. The pathophysiology of these progressive changes is still unclear and subject of recent research [3,4,5].

The extent of fatty infiltration and RC atrophy is crucial for the clinical results after rotator cuff reconstruction (RCR). Advanced degenerative changes are associated with poor clinical outcome and higher failure rate after RCR [1, 6,7,8]. The course of initiated degenerative changes after RCR is still debated. While some author reported stabilization of degeneration after successful RCR, others postulate an irreversible process with worsening of fatty infiltration and RC atrophy over time [1, 6, 7, 9].

Recently, Deniz et al. demonstrated stabilization of RC atrophy and fatty infiltration after primary RCR when rotator cuff integrity was maintained. In case of re-tear the authors showed that fatty infiltration and atrophy continued to deteriorate [10]. After revision surgery, tendon integrity appears to be a problem despite a good clinical outcome. In short-term follow-up, ultrasound and MRI controlled examinations indicated only a 48% to 60% healing rate [11,12,13].

There is no information whether revision RCR prevents further muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration after failed primary repair. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy after revision RCR and to correlate them with functional outcome parameters. It was hypothesized that progression of fatty infiltration and RC atrophy can be preserved after successful revision and that tissue quality and repair integrity positively correlates with clinical outcome.

Methods

Study population

A retrospective review with prospective clinical and radiological evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 24 months was performed. Patients who [1] underwent arthroscopic revision RCR of [2] the supraspinatus tendon between 2008 and 2014 were included. Revision surgery was indicated due to [3] residual pain, loss of strength or function of the affected arm and [4] full-thickness supraspinatus re-rupture on MRI. These subjects were identified from a previous series of revision repair patients with shoulder magnetic resonance imaging obtained at least 24 months postoperatively [13]. Patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis exceeding Samilson and Prieto grade I were excluded from analysis. Demographic and surgical data were documented from medical records, operation report and follow up notes. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (No.: 128/16 S) and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave their written informed consent.

Clinical outcome assessments

All patients underwent clinical assessments prior to arthroscopic revision RCR and at final follow-up evaluation. Constant shoulder score (CS) and the American shoulder and elbow score (ASES) were used to measure subjective outcome. Pain was scaled with the visual analog pain score (VAS). Furthermore, patients were asked if they were satisfied with the clinical outcome after revision repair (very satisfied, satisfied, not satisfied).

Radiological evaluation

All patients underwent standardized radiographs (true a.p., y-view, axial) before surgery to rule out glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) exceeding state I according to Samilson and Prieto [14]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the affected shoulder was performed prior to surgery and at the final-up evaluation at least 24 months after arthroscopic revision RCR. Postoperative MRI was performed using a 3-Tesla scanner and a dedicated 8-channel shoulder coil (Ingenia, Philips, Best, The Netherlands). The following pulse sequences were acquired with a section thickness of 3 mm: parasagittal T1- and fat-suppressed intermediate weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences, parasagittal T2-weighted and fat-suppressed intermediate weighted TSE sequences, and a transverse intermediate weighted TSE sequence with fat suppression. Both MRI examinations were evaluated by two independent orthopaedic senior residents (L.W., L.L.) and one radiologic consultant (K.W.) specialized in musculoskeletal radiology listed as authors.

First the integrity of the supraspinatus tendon was assessed by using the classification of Sugaya et al. [15]: Type I, intact tendon repair without inhomogeneous signal; type II, intact tendon repair with high signal in partial area suggesting degeneration; type III, thinned tendon without discontinuity classified as partial retear; type IV, small RC re-tear and type V major discontinuity. Type I to III were rated as an integrated supraspinatus tendon, type IV and V as a re-tear.

Fatty infiltration was classified according to Fuchs et al. [16]: Grade 0, no fatty infiltration; Grade 1, some fatty streaks in the supraspinatus muscle; Grade 2, less than 50% of fat compared to muscle; Grade 3, equal amounts of fat and muscle; Grade 4, more fat, less muscle.

Atrophy of the supraspinatus muscle was classified and measured according to the Thomazeau classification [9]. The estimated anatomical surface of the supraspinatus muscle (fossa supraspinatus) and the actual surface of the supraspinatus muscle were measured. The occupation ratio was calculated. Due to the occupation ratio, muscle atrophy was rated: Stage 1, normal atrophy occupation ratio (1.0–0.6); Stage 2, moderate atrophy occupation ratio (0.6–0.4); Stage 3, severe atrophy occupation ratio (< 0.4).

All measurements were performed on oblique sagittal T1-weigthed MR images at the most medial sagittal section that shows a Y-shaped configuration of the scapula. The time from preoperative MRI to surgery was on average 50 ± 37 days (range, 2–127).

Surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation

All patients were operated or directly supervised by the senior surgeon (A.B.I.). Surgery was performed in general anesthesia without interscalene nerve block in beach chair position. Preparation and draping using sterile technique followed diagnostic arthroscopy. If not already done in prior surgery, the long head of the biceps tendon underwent either tenodesis or tenotomy. Tear size and configuration of the supraspinatus tendon were evaluated. Subacromial release of adhesions and bursectomy was performed and the supraspinatus tear was debrided. An extensive release of the supraspinatus tendon was done intraarticular and subacromial until tension-free mobility/traction of the tendon was achieved. To enhance healing decortication of the greater tuberosity was performed by using a shaver until bleeding of the debrided bone was visible. Depending on tear size, four patients were operated with single-row and 15 with double-row (crossing suture-bridge) configuration with double loaded anchors (Titan-Corkscrew or Bio-Corkscrew 5.5 mm). In all patients, a complete reduction of the supraspinatus tear to the anatomical footprint was achieved.

For postoperative management, all patients had the affected arm secured in an arm orthesis with 30° of abduction for 4–6 weeks. Pain medication was utilized as required. Physical therapy started at postoperative day one with passive flexion and abduction and free range of motion (Abduction was limited not to be less than 30°). Active-assisted exercises were allowed in postoperative week 7 and active movements after 9 weeks. Physical therapy with a professional therapist took place 2 to 3 times per week for at least 3 months after surgery.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess data for normal distribution. In this data set, continuous variables were normally distributed, except postoperative ASES, and stated as mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables were stated as percentages and frequency distribution. Students t-test was used to calculate differences of continuous variables (pre- and postoperative scores). In order to find a correlation between tendon integrity and clinical outcome scores Spearman correlation test was used. Fisher’s exact test was utilized to study differences in pre- and postoperative categorical variables (RC atrophy and fatty infiltration). ICC was calculated for inter-rater reliability. Statistical significance was set at a p value of < 0.05.

Results

Clinical outcome

19 patients (17 males and 2 females), with a mean age of 57.5 years (range, 34 to 72) were surveyed at a mean follow-up of 50.3 months (range, 24 – 101, see also Table 1). At final follow up the mean ASES score improved from 47.73 ± 17.2 preoperatively to 75.4 ± 23.7 postoperatively (p < 0.001), the mean CS from 42.7 ± 17.7 preoperatively to 65.2 ± 20.1 postoperatively (p < 0.001) and the mean VAS significantly from 6.0 ± 1.8 preoperatively to 1.6 ± 2.1 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Improvements exceeded MCID of all scores. At final follow up 14 patients (74%) were very satisfied, 3 patients (16%) satisfied and 2 patients (10%) not satisfied. There was no preoperative difference in CS (39.0 ± 28.3 vs. 44.9 ± 10.4, p > 0.05) but in ASES (29.7 ± 10.9 vs. 58.0 ± 9.7, p < 0.01) between the intact and re-tear group. Tendon retraction according to Patte and preoperative tendon length was similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, re-tear classification according to Sugaya showed larger preoperative re-tears in patients who were in the re-tear group compared to the successful repair group (p < 0.05).

Table 1 Preoperative comparison of demographic factors, clinical scores and rotator cuff status on MRI between the patients with healed or failed rotator cuff revision surgery
Full size table

Postoperative abduction was 155 ± 34° in intact RC and 145 ± 39° in patients with a retear. Patients with an intact supraspinatus tendon exhibited abduction strength of 61.6 ± 34.3N, whereas patients with re-tear showed abduction strength of 42.2 ± 28.0N (p > 0.05).

Radiological outcome

Preoperative re-tears before revision were classified as follows: 9 patients had a type V (major discontinuity) and 10 patients a type IV (small full-thickness RC re-tear) re-tear of the supraspinatus tendon according to the Sugaya classification. Preoperative tendon retraction according to Patte was: 7 patients grade I, 9 patients grade II and 3 patients grade III. 3 patients (16%) presented with no fatty infiltration, 13 patients (68%) with grade 1 and 3 patients (16%) with grade 2 prior to revision surgery.

At final follow-up, 9 patients (47%) had an intact supraspinatus tendon (4 patients Sugaya type II; 5 patients Sugaya type III) and 10 patients (53%) presented with a re-ruptured supraspinatus tendon (3 patients Sugaya type IV; 7 patients Sugaya type V). Re-tear location was at the enthesis in 6 patients, at the musculotendinous junction in 3 patients and intratendinous in 1 patient.

The group with an intact supraspinatus tendon postoperatively presented with no difference in fatty infiltration compared to preoperative status and a decrease of atrophy in one patient (1/9 patients, 11%, Fig. 1). In contrast, 5 out of 10 patients (50%) with recurrent RC tears showed progression in fatty infiltration (Fig. 2). RC atrophy showed an advance in 2/10 patients (20%) at time of follow up in the re-tear group. A decrease of fatty infiltration was not recognized in any patient. There was no statistical difference observed preoperatively to postoperatively with regard to these measurements. Table 2 and Table 3 summarize the changes over time in fatty infiltration and atrophy of the supraspinatus muscle observed in the evaluated patients, respectively. The severity of postoperative fatty infiltration or muscle atrophy were not associated with better or worse clinical outcome scores (p > 0.05). The Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.89 (CI 95%, 0.70–0.96) for inter-rater agreement for the classification of Sugaya.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Postoperative coronal MRI showing intact supraspinatus tendon fixed in double-row technique. B Preoperative parasagittal MRI of supraspinatus muscle showing good muscle quality slight atrophy due to retraction. C Postoperative parasagittal MRI of supraspinatus muscle showing no progression of muscle atrophy or fatty infiltration

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

A Postoperative coronal MRI showing a supraspintatus tendon re-tear at final follow up (Sugaya Type IV). B Preoperative parasagittal MRI of supraspinatus muscle showing slight atrophy. C Postoperative parasagittal MRI of supraspinatus muscle showing progression of atrophy and fatty infiltration due to RC retear

Full size image
Table 2 Changes of fatty infiltration according to Fuchs classification in evaluated patients
Full size table
Table 3 Changes in muscle atrophy according to Thomazeau classification in evaluated patients
Full size table

Correlations

When comparing functional results in patients with intact rotator cuff and re-tear, both groups improved in clinical outcome parameters pre- to postoperatively (p < 0.001). No differences at final follow-up for CS and ASES were observed between the groups. Improvements in CS and ASES score were similar in both groups (CS 66.3 ± 24.5 vs. 64.4 ± 17.9, ASES 74.7 ± 22.3 vs. 76.0 ± 25.9; n.s.). Preoperative tendon retraction, RC atrophy or fatty infiltration were not correlated with tendon healing in this cohort. No correlation between RC integrity and clinical outcome as well as supraspinatus atrophy was detected. A strong correlation (Correlation coefficient R = 0.77, p = 0.01) between fatty infiltration and cuff integrity was observed.

Discussion

The study results demonstrate that the status of supraspinatus muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration can be preserved after revision RCR provided that the repair remains intact. However, a regress of fatty infiltration could not be observed. Good to excellent clinical results and high patient satisfaction were observed after arthroscopic revision RCR regardless of the RC integrity.

There are several MRI studies focusing on the tear pattern and outcome after RCR failure [17,18,19]. Trantalis et al. [17] reported on a small series of five patients with RC re-tears following primary double-row rotator cuff repair and found re-tearing medial to the anchor reconstruction at the musculotendinous junction. In agreement with these findings, Hayashida et al.[18] described a prevalence of medial row failure in 7 of 13 (54%) re-tears within a group of 47 (15%) cases. While the rotator cuff construct seems not to be the limiting factor for long-term healing, the focus of interest switched to degenerative status of the muscle and tendon. A rising number of rotator cuff repairs in elderly with decreased tissue quality could be observed [19, 20]. Djurasovic et al. reported on 24 patients (30%) with poor tendon quality in revision rotator cuff repair (rated subjectively at time of surgery), postulating that the muscle and tendon undergo an intrinsic degeneration [19]. Et al. showed that the state of fatty infiltration (especially in the infraspinatus muscle) could be a reference for successful cuff healing after primary RCR [21].

With regard to outcome after revision RC repairs only few studies reported on clinical outcomes; whereof seven used an arthroscopic approach [11, 12, 19, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The functional results and patient satisfaction improved in all series in similar amount to the findings in this study. The prevalence of RCR failure in ultrasound studies ranged from 0 – 62% [11, 12, 26, 29]. The results from the present study after arthroscopic revision repair evaluated by MRI showed a re-tear rate of 53% which is slightly above the average rate reported in the literature. This could be due to the long follow up period since Shamsudin et al. reported an increased number of re-tears over time with a prevalence of 28% after 6 months and 40% two years after surgery [12].

Previous studies reported on pre- and postoperative changes in fatty infiltration and RC atrophy after primary repair with inconsistent findings [1, 6, 9, 30].

First, Goutallier et al. as well as Thomazeau et al. reported promising results with a reduction of fatty infiltration in the supraspinatus muscle in up to 10% of patients with an intact RCR [1, 6, 9]. Yamaguchi et al. showed an reduction of fatty infiltration in 25% and of RC atrophy in 50% of patients with intact primary RCR [30]. The authors underlined the importance of a sufficient follow-up period to detect these changes. These findings were supported by animal studies: Coleman et al. demonstrated a decrease of fatty infiltration in the early follow-up period after RCR [31]. Despite the promising results described in previous studies, we did not find a reduction of fatty infiltration and a decrease in muscle atrophy in only one patient. Provided that the rotator cuff remains intact after revision repair, the state of degeneration could, however, be preserved.

These findings are in agreement with studies from Gerber [32], Gupta [33] and Liu [34] who could not find a reduction in muscle degeneration in animal studies. These studies showed that fatty infiltration starts 6 months after the occurrence of RC tear but could be stabilized when tendon integrity was restored, [32,33,34]. Lee et al. showed an increase of fatty infiltration in all patients from pre- to postoperative in their short-term computed tomography follow-up of 12.7 months [35]. These findings were supported by Bartl et al. in patients with massive rotator cuff tears showing a progress of fatty infiltration in all patients [36]. Gladstone et al. demonstrated a progression of fatty infiltration in all their patients, but the degree was significantly higher in patients with RC re-tear at time of follow-up [7]. We believe that fatty infiltration and RC atrophy is an almost irreversible process where, in the best possible case, the status of fatty infiltration and RC atrophy can be preserved but not reversed.

Postoperative tendon integrity seems to be the best predictor for progression of muscle degeneration after primary as well as revision RCR. Interestingly, no difference in clinical outcome was observed in both groups (intact vs. re-tears) that could be explained by the possible restoration of the force couple, which preserves good clinical results and patient satisfactory as reported before by Jost et al. and Paxton et al. [37, 38]. Furthermore, the good clinical outcome in the re-tear group might be explained by decreased tear size or intensive postoperative rehabilitation.

The present study has several strengths, but also limitations. The follow-up period was at least 24 months; and with a mean of 50.3 months the follow-up was sufficient to detect changes in RC degeneration. Both, the pre- and postoperative MRI was evaluated and rated by both the orthopedic surgeon and the musculoskeletal radiologist. Additionally, all arthroscopic revision RCR were performed or supervised by one senior surgeon (blinded for review) at one single institution.

However, the study has some weaknesses including a heterogeneous cohort of evaluated patients. The small number of individuals was given by the fact that revision RCR is recommended and performed only in selected patients with high functional demands and good tissue quality. This leads to a selection bias due to preoperative subject analysis for reparability of the rotator cuff, tendon and muscle quality. Results could be affected by confounders which have not been analysed due to the small number of patients. Further standardized prospective investigations with larger population cohort are needed to determine higher grade of scientific evidence.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair resulted in good to excellent functional outcomes even in case of recurrent RC retear. An intact RCR maintains the preoperative state of fatty infiltration and RC atrophy but does not result in tissue regeneration. Rotator cuff integrity showed a moderate correlation with fatty infiltration.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994(304):78–83.

  2. Rubino LJ, Stills HF Jr, Sprott DC, Crosby LA. Fatty infiltration of the torn rotator cuff worsens over time in a rabbit model. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(7):717–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang JR, Gupta R. Mechanisms of fatty degeneration in massive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(2):175–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Laron D, Samagh SP, Liu X, Kim HT, Feeley BT. Muscle degeneration in rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(2):164–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HM, Galatz LM, Lim C, Havlioglu N, Thomopoulos S. The effect of tear size and nerve injury on rotator cuff muscle fatty degeneration in a rodent animal model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(7):847–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P, Leguilloux P, Van Driessche S. Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(6):550–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gladstone JN, Bishop JY, Lo IK, Flatow EL. Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(5):719–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harryman DT, 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA, 3rd. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(7):982–9.

  9. Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, Chaperon J, Langlais F. Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:275–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deniz G, Kose O, Tugay A, Guler F, Turan A. Fatty degeneration and atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles after arthroscopic repair: does it improve, halt or deteriorate? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(7):985–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keener JD, wie AS, Kim HM, Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Galatz LM, et al. Revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: repair integrity and clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(3):590–8.

  12. Shamsudin A, Lam PH, Peters K, Rubenis I, Hackett L, Murrell GA. Revision versus primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year analysis of outcomes in 360 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):557–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willinger L, Lacheta L, Beitzel K, Buchmann S, Woertler K, Imhoff AB, et al. Clinical Outcomes, Tendon Integrity, and Shoulder Strength After Revision Rotator Cuff Reconstruction: A Minimum 2 Years’ Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(11):2700–6.

  14. Samilson RL, Prieto V. Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(4):456–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(5):953–60.

  16. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C. Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8(6):599–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IK. Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):727–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayashida K, Tanaka M, Koizumi K, Kakiuchi M. Characteristic retear patterns assessed by magnetic resonance imaging after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(4):458–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Djurasovic M, Marra G, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. Revision rotator cuff repair: factors influencing results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(12):1849–55.

  20. Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. Techniques for managing poor quality tissue and bone during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(10):1409–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park JS, Park HJ, Kim SH, Oh JH. Prognostic Factors Affecting Rotator Cuff Healing After Arthroscopic Repair in Small to Medium-sized Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(10):2386–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lo IK, Burkhart SS. Arthroscopic revision of failed rotator cuff repairs: technique and results. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(3):250–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piasecki DP, Verma NN, Nho SJ, Bhatia S, Boniquit N, Cole BJ, et al. Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):40–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ladermann A, Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. Midterm outcome of arthroscopic revision repair of massive and nonmassive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(12):1620–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hartzler RU, Sperling JW, Schleck CD, Cofield RH. Clinical and radiographic factors influencing the results of revision rotator cuff repair. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2013;7(2):41–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Parnes N, DeFranco M, Wells JH, Higgins LD, Warner JJ. Complications after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(9):1479–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chuang MJ, Jancosko J, Nottage WM. Clinical outcomes of single-row arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Orthopedics. 2014;37(8):e692–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Skoff HD. Revision Rotator Cuff Reconstruction for Large Tears With Retraction: A Novel Technique Using Autogenous Tendon and Autologous Marrow. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(7):326–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ladermann A, Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. Management of failed rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. J ISAKOS. 2016;1(1):32–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamaguchi H, Suenaga N, Oizumi N, Hosokawa Y, Kanaya F. Will preoperative atrophy and Fatty degeneration of the shoulder muscles improve after rotator cuff repair in patients with massive rotator cuff tears? Adv Orthop. 2012;2012: 195876.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Coleman SH, Fealy S, Ehteshami JR, MacGillivray JD, Altchek DW, Warren RF, et al. Chronic rotator cuff injury and repair model in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(12):2391–402.

  32. Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Hoppeler H, Meyer DC. Correlation of atrophy and fatty infiltration on strength and integrity of rotator cuff repairs: a study in thirteen patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):691–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gupta R, Lee TQ. Contributions of the different rabbit models to our understanding of rotator cuff pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(5 Suppl):S149–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu X, Manzano G, Kim HT, Feeley BT. A rat model of massive rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(4):588–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee E, Choi JA, Oh JH, Ahn S, Hong SH, Chai JW, et al. Fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscles on pre- and postoperative CT arthrography (CTA): is the Goutallier grading system reliable? Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(9):1259–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bartl C, Kouloumentas P, Holzapfel K, Eichhorn S, Wortler K, Imhoff A, et al. Long-term outcome and structural integrity following open repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2012;6(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Jost B, Zumstein M, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C. Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(3):472–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Dahiya N, Keener JD, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of failed repairs of large or massive rotator cuff tears: minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(7):627–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. No funding received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany

    Lucca Lacheta, Sebastian Siebenlist, Bastian Scheiderer, Knut Beitzel, Andreas B. Imhoff, Stefan Buchmann & Lukas Willinger

  2. ATOS Orthoparc Klinik, Cologne, Germany

    Knut Beitzel

  3. Musculoskeletal Radiology Section, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany

    Klaus Woertler

  4. Orthopaedisches Fachzentrum (OFZ) Weilheim/Garmisch/Starnberg/Penzberg, Weilheim, Germany

    Stefan Buchmann

Authors
  1. Lucca Lacheta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sebastian Siebenlist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bastian Scheiderer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Knut Beitzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Klaus Woertler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andreas B. Imhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefan Buchmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lukas Willinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LW, BS and LL performed patient recruitment and data collection. LW, SS, SB, KB and KW performed data analysis and interpretation. LL, BS and LW performed the literature review and primary manuscript preparation. ABI, SB, KB, and SS assisted with initial drafting of the manuscript, as well as editing and final draft preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas Willinger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (No.: 128/16 S) of the Technical University of Munich, Germany, and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave their written informed consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

B.S. is a paid consultant for Arthrex Inc. (Naples, FL). K.B. is a consultant for Arthrex Inc. (Naples, FL) and medi GmbH (Bayreuth, Germany). S.S. is a consultant for Arthrex, Medi Bayreuth, medartis AG and KLS Martin Group. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lacheta, L., Siebenlist, S., Scheiderer, B. et al. Intact revision rotator cuff repair stabilizes muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration after minimum follow up of two years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 515 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06616-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06616-2

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us