Skip to main content

Outcomes of U-shaped internal fixation in the treatment of avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of U-shaped internal fixation for calcaneal tubercle fracture after nearly 3 years of case follow-up and data collection.

Method

We retrospectively analyzed the collected data from 16 patients with avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle between December 2018 and February 2021 at our institute. All patients were required to conform to regular follow up postoperatively. X-ray film was applied to all cases. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) score, Cedell score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate functional results.

Results

All patients achieved bone union. The preoperative AOFAS score was 26.34 ± 3.34, which was significantly different from 91.38 ± 6.15 half a year after operation (p = 0.003). The preoperative Cedell score was 31.05 ± 4.18 and the score half a year after operation was 92.17 ± 5.39(p = 0.011). The VAS score was 8.91 ± 1.51 before operation and decreased to 0.58 ± 1.31 half a year after operation (p = 0.014).

Conclusions

In the treatments of calcaneal tubercle fracture, U-shaped internal fixation is a new attempt. Through the short-term follow-up study, we found that its therapeutic effect is excellent, which is a recommended treatment in clinic.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Calcaneal tubercle is an important part of heel, which is of great significance in maintaining foot arch and buffering weight [1, 2]. Avulsion tubercle fracture of calcaneus is common in the elderly and athletes. when the ankle is strongly dorsiflexed or under direct stress, the elderly often has avulsion fractures due to osteoporosis and the decline of mechanical properties, which lead to the calcaneus unable to bear the traction of Achilles tendon. This is different from the calcaneal tubercle fracture caused by longitudinal violence in young athletes [3, 4]. The incidence of avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle is not high, it only accounts for 1.3% ~ 2.7% of all calcaneal fractures [5]. Due to the traction of Achilles tendon, the fracture displacement of calcaneal tubercle is often large, which is easy to cause excessive local tension or soft tissue irritation, resulting in local flap necrosis. If the condition worsens, the calcaneus and achilles tendon may be exposed [6]. Therefore, early surgical intervention is helpful to reduce the incidence of soft tissue necrosis and restore the function of triceps and the ability of metatarsal foot as soon as possible. These are of great significance to the rehabilitation of patients [7]. However, the opinions of scholars on which internal fixation method should be used for calcaneal tubercle fracture are not unified. The main clinical methods are internal fixation with wire anchor, screw and calcaneal plate [8,9,10,11]. Due to the traction of Achilles tendon and the special anatomical structure of the surgical site, high requirements are put forward for the firmness of internal fixation. It is reported that many cases of calcaneal tubercle fracture have complications such as failure of internal fixation, re-displacement of fracture, bone resorption and skin necrosis [12, 13]. Need for secondary surgery due to various complications ranged from 20 to 36.3% in the literature [14, 15]. Carnero martín et al. found that the incidence of complications after treatment was about 30% when the displacement of fracture block was less than 2 cm. When the displacement was greater than or equal to 2 cm, the probability of complications will soar to 90%, especially those involving soft tissue [16]. We have proposed a new and safe U-shaped internal fixation method (180-degree annular internal fixation) for the treatment of calcaneal tubercle fractures [17]. To analyze the efficacy of this treatment method for calcaneal tubercle fracture after nearly 3 years of case follow-up and data collection, we hope to provide a new treatment option for clinicians.

Patients and methods

The avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle was classified using the method described by Beavis et al. [18]. The inclusion criteria for the research were as follows: [1] acute, avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle (grade I and II) determined according to the classification described by Beavis et al.; [2] no more than 14 days of trauma; [3] signed informed consent. The exclusion criteria were as follows: [1] other types (grade III); [2] no signed informed consent; [3] previous surgery on the heel; [4] history of avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle or other heel trauma.

We retrospectively analyzed the collected data from 16 patients with avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle between December 2018 and February 2021 at Ningbo No.6 Hospital. All cases were performed by two surgeons (WGL and DX). The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ningbo No.6 Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the participants, and the research methods were carried out in accordance with approved guidelines.

Surgical methods

A 4–5 cm U-shaped incision was made on the horizontal plane at the level of the calcaneal tubercle after general anesthesia. Gradually separate the soft tissue according to the anatomical structure, and expose the calcaneal tubercle fracture on the premise of protecting the Achilles tendon, peripheral blood vessels and other tissues as much as possible. Then we reduced the fracture block under the naked eye and temporarily fixed it with Kirschner wires. The next is the most critical step. By making a soft tissue channel in front of the Achilles tendon stop, the pre-curved micro locking plate (Weigao, Shandong, China) was U-shaped fixed on both sides of the calcaneal tubercle with the locking screws. If the fracture block was large and the traction force of Achilles tendon was strong, we can add another micro locking plate to increase stability and firmness (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a.b.c: Schematic diagram of the surgical incision. A 4-5 cm U-shaped incision was made on the horizontal plane at the level of the calcaneal tubercle. d: Schematic diagram of the location of the U-shaped internal fixation. The internal fixation was located in the soft tissue space anterior to the Achilles tendon

Postoperative management

The ankle brace was need for three weeks after surgery. The patient began to ankle exercise from the first day after surgery by guiding of the surgeon. After 3 weeks, the patients can do some daily exercises and walk with weight under the protection of crutches. Patients were encouraged to walk with full weight bearing at 6 weeks postoperatively and to participate in normal daily physical exercise at 12 weeks postoperatively. After 12 months, the internal fixation was always removed.

Clinical evaluation

The regular follow up times were 1, 3 ,6 and 12 months. The maintenance of the plate and the fracture were evaluated by the routine anteroposterior and lateral imaging of the heel. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) score, Cedell score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate functional results [19,20,21].

Statistics

Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was used to express the numerical data. AOFAS score before and after surgery was compared by Paired t test. The software SPSS 20.0 was used for statistical analysis, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

General results

In this study, 9 male and 7 female with the average age of 52.9 years were included. About the injury-to-surgery interval (ISI), there were 3.3 days. The operation time were 55.1 min. All patients were followed up for an average of 12.6 months (Table 1).

Table 1 Patient Information

Functional results

The preoperative AOFAS score was 26.34 ± 3.34, which was significantly different from 91.38 ± 6.15 half a year after operation (p = 0.003). The preoperative Cedell score was 31.05 ± 4.18 and the score half a year after operation was 92.17 ± 5.39. It was also considered that there was a significant difference in statistical analysis (p = 0.011). The VAS score was 8.91 ± 1.51 before operation and decreased to 0.58 ± 1.31 half a year after operation (p = 0.014) (Table 2). All patients got bone healing. There were no postoperative infection, hardware failure and fractures of calcaneal tubercle (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Functional results
Fig. 2
figure 2

a.b: CT scan of the calcaneus plus three-dimensional reconstruction, the fracture of calcaneal tuberosity with obvious displacement. c.d: Lateral and axial films of calcaneus 3 days after operation. Two micro locking plates were used to fix the fracture block from the back of Achilles tendon insertion point and in front of Achilles tendon insertion point respectively. The reduction of fracture block was good and the internal fixation was firm. e.f: Lateral and axial films of calcaneus half a year after operation. The fracture healed well without complications

Discussion

The calcaneal tubercle is the attachment point of the Achilles tendon, and its upper edge forms an angle of 30 ~ 45 degree with the talocalcaneal articular surface (Bohler angle). When the displacement of calcaneal tubercle fracture is greater than 6 mm, the angle will shrink or disappear, and even become a negative angle in severe cases. This will change the lever of the Achilles tendon and cause significant changes in the load and contact point of the subtalar joint. It is easy to develop into large painful protrusions and cause persistent pain and early traumatic arthritis [22]. Therefore, open reduction and internal fixation is the first choice in the treatment scheme. The key to treatment is to restore the counterpoint relation of subtalar joint and Bohler angle.

The surgical treatment of calcaneal tubercle fracture includes screw fixation, plate fixation, Kirschner wire fixation, anchor fixation, external fixation and fracture fragment resection [23,24,25]. Giordano et al. [26] reported that calcaneal tuberosity fractures were more common in osteoporotic patients, such as the elderly, diabetes and autoimmune diseases. Osteoporosis makes fixation more difficult. Some researchers advocated that the fracture should be treated by lag screw fixation or combined with anchor and wire fixation through the distal lateral or medial approach of Achilles tendon [27]. Although lag screw fixation is the most widely accepted surgical method for the treatment of this fracture, we found a high rate of re-displacement of fracture in early follow-up. At the same time, the fracture site needed to be fixed for a long time, which was easy to lead to the loss of ankle dorsiflexion angle and the decline of heel lifting function of Achilles tendon in the later stage [28]. The hoop wire based on the principle of tension band fixation effectively neutralizes the upward traction of Achilles tendon. It is a simple and easy fixation method, which has advantages compared with other fixation methods. However, some scholars also reported that the loosening and stimulation of internal fixation of posterior calcaneal tubercle caused skin complications and discomfort as high as 64% in the later follow-up [29]. The anchor combined with lag screw strengthens the lag screw fixation of fracture and neutralizes the tension of Achilles tendon. Compared with single screw fixation, the load of this reinforcement method is almost twice that of screw fixation. However, this method needs to pull the tendinous part of the Achilles tendon, which is prone to complications such as Achilles tendon contracture and loss of heel lifting function of Achilles tendon in varying degrees in the later follow-up [30]. On the one hand, calcaneal tubercle is vulnerable to strong traction of Achilles tendon. On the other hand, calcaneus is cancellous bone and the strength of screw fixation is limited, which is prone to re-displacement of fracture and fixation failure. How to avoid local skin necrosis, internal fixation failure, local irritation discomfort at Achilles tendon stop point and loss of heel lifting function of Achilles tendon? How can we carry out early functional exercise after treatment? These are difficult points in the clinical treatment of calcaneal tubercle fracture.

The treatment method of U-shaped fixation (180-degree fixation) of calcaneal tubercle fracture with micro locking plate was first proposed by us in early 2021, which provides a new treatment scheme for clinicians. After early case collection and data analysis, we found that its clinical efficacy was excellent, and there were no obvious complications after operation. It was a safe treatment for calcaneal tubercle fracture. Compared with traditional surgery, this method adopted U-shaped incision which was different from traditional straight and L-shaped incision. Some researchers believed that the soft tissue covering Achilles tendon and calcaneal tubercle was thin and the blood supply was unstable. If the operation at this site encountered some complications of the wound, it was a devastating problem for the operator. Using U-shaped incision at the level of calcaneal tubercle, the surgical scars were more aesthetically pleasing, less prone to scars contracture, and conducive to faster wound healing process. These might be due to the fact that the incision was parallel to the skin lines. In addition, the incision could directly expose the avulsed bone fragments, which was conducive to the operation [31]. Our study also found that the incision had little invasion to the soft tissue, and the incision along the transverse lines of the skin was more conducive to the beauty of the postoperative scar. At the same time, the postoperative scar had no contracture and little effect on the ankle movement. The volume of the micro steel plate used in our operation was small, and the probability of compression on the heel skin was almost zero. During our follow-up for more than one year, no similar compression was found. There was a certain space between the Achilles tendon stop and the posterior calcaneal tubercle, which was enough to meet the placement of 1 to 2 micro plates. If the fixation strength of one steel plate was not enough, a micro steel plate (Fig. 2) could be added behind the Achilles tendon stop for the cases with large fracture block and obvious displacement, and there was no need to worry about the incision caused by its compression on the skin. Calcaneus was composed of cancellous bone, which was not an ideal fixation site and was easy to cause loosening and failure of internal fixation [32]. Although the calcaneal tubercle was the site with good bone quality and mechanical properties in the whole calcaneus [33], the probability of internal fixation failure was not low due to the strong traction of Achilles tendon [14, 15]. We need a mechanically stronger fixation method in clinic. U-shaped locking steel plate fixation meets this demand to a certain extent. Relying on the good plasticity of the micro locking plate, we can pre bend and shape the plate according to the specific shape of the fracture block during the operation. We need to place the plate as close to the cortical bone of the calcaneal tubercle as possible, and bend it to form a “U” like structure to wrap the fracture block of the posterior calcaneal tubercle. The U-shaped (180 degree) cross screw placement method is used for bicortical locking fixation with sufficient screws to provide more powerful mechanical strength, which can greatly strengthen the firmness and reliability of fixation and achieve the purpose of early postoperative functional exercise. It is especially suitable for elderly patients with osteoporosis. The results of our study also confirmed the reliability of this method. None of the 16 patients underwent revision surgery because of internal fixation failure. The excellent efficacy was also illustrated by the functional scores at the postoperative follow-up. The AOFAS score was 91.38 ± 6.15 half a year after operation. Significant improvement in postoperative AOFAS functional scores compared to research treated the calcaneal tubercle fracture with screws and plates [14, 34]. Beavis III fracture was not included in this study. The main consideration is that the operation method we recommend is mainly suitable for fracture types with a certain volume of fracture blocks. Micro plates and locking screws can be well fixed. For Beavis III fractures, anchors may be a more appropriate fixation method [35].

Strengths and limitations

U-shaped fixation is a new treatment for calcaneal tubercle fracture. Through more than 2 years of case collection, we found that the therapeutic effect is positive and is a recommended treatment. However, the number of cases in our study needs to be increased, and there is a lack of prospective comparative study. In addition, the biomechanical research of U-shaped fixation is still blank, and we need basic mechanical research to verify the mechanical advantages of this fixation scheme.

Conclusions

In the treatments of calcaneal tubercle fracture, U-shaped internal fixation is a new attempt. Through the short-term follow-up study, we found that its therapeutic effect is excellent, which is a recommended treatment in clinic.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AOFAS:

American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association score

VAS:

Visual analog scale

ISI:

Injury-to-surgery interval

References

  1. Biz C, Refolo M, Zinnarello FD, et al. A historical review of calcaneal fractures: from the crucifixion of Jesus Christ and Don Juan injuries to the current plate osteosynthesis. Int Orthop. 2022;46(6):1413–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05384-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klos K, Gueorguiev B, Carow JB, et al. Soft tissue microcirculation around the healthy Achilles tendon: a cross-sectional study focusing on the Achilles tendon and dorsal surgical approaches to the hindfoot. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0850-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Galluzzo M, Greco F, Pietragalla M, et al. Calcaneal fractures: radiological and CT evaluation and classification systems. Acta Biomed. 2018;89(1–S):138–50. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v89i1-S.7017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Harb Z, Dachepalli S, Mani G. An alternative method of fixation of calcaneal tuberosity fractures using the tightrope(®) technique. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(6):762–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenhagen RM, Highlander PD. Burns PR.Double row an-chor fixation: a novel technique for a diabetic calanceal in-sufficiency avulsion fracture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;51(1):123–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Cai P, Cheng L, et al. Local Random Pattern Flap Coverage for Implant exposure following Open Reduction Internal fixation via Extensile lateral Approach to the Calcaneus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):567. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04427-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Stapleton JJ, Kolodenker G, Zgonis T. Internal and external fixation approaches to the surgical management of calcaneal fractures. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27(3):381–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2010.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bläsius FM, Stockem LE, Knobe M, et al. Predictors for wound healing complications and prolonged hospital stay in patients with isolated calcaneal fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(4):3157–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01863-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakatsuki T, Imade S, Uchio Y. Avulsion fracture of the calcaneal tuberosity treated using a side-locking loop suture (SLLS) technique through bone tunnels. J Orthop Sci. 2016;21(5):690–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2015.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pflüger P, Zyskowski M, Greve F, et al. Patient-reported outcome following operative and conservative treatment of calcaneal fractures: a retrospective analysis of 79 patients at short- to midterm Follow-Up. Front Surg. 2021;8:620964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.620964.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shota M, Tachibana T, Iseki T. Avulsion fracture of the calcaneal tuberosity treated with novel surgical technique using the combination of the side-locking loop suture technique and ring pins: a case report. J Surg Case Rep. 2023;2023(4):rjad173. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjad173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Syros A, Perez J, Hodgens BH, et al. Sinus tarsi approach in high-risk patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures: a case series. J Orthop. 2022;34:282–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2022.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Filardi V. Stress shielding analysis on easy step staple prosthesis for calcaneus fractures. J Orthop. 2019;18:132–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu GR, Pang QJ, Yu X, et al. Surgical management for avulsion fracture of the calcaneal tuberosity. Orthop Surg. 2013;5(3):196–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12058.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gitajn IL, Abousayed M, Toussaint RJ, et al. Calcaneal avulsion fractures: a case series of 33 patients describing prognostic factors and outcomes. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640014548323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Carnero-Martín P, Bautista-Enrique D, Gómez-Cáceres A, et al. Avulsion fractures of posterior calcaneal tuberosity: identification of prognostic factors and classification. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(3):423–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu D, Lou W, Li M, et al. The treatment of avulsion fracture of the calcaneal tuberosity: a new technique of 180-Degree annular internal fixation. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:275–80. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S291497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Beavis RC, Rourke K, Court-Brown C. Avulsion fracture of the calcaneal tuberosity: a case report and literature review. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(8):863–6. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2008.0000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eke I, Akcal MA, Sayrac AV, et al. Effects of intralesional pulsed radiofrequency treatment on pain in patients with calcaneal spur: results of 460 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):1033. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04926-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang L, Wu J, Li M, et al. Cannulated screw and Kirschner fixation for the treatment of medial and lateral malleolar epiphyseal fractures in children: a retrospective study of 36 cases. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1287-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Biz C, de Iudicibus G, Belluzzi E, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain syndrome in patients who have undergone hallux valgus percutaneous surgery: a comparison of sciatic-femoral and ankle regional ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):1043. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04911-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu H, Hou R, Ju J, et al. Articular calcaneal fractures: open or minimally invasive surgery, when the medial wall reduction is obtained percutaneously from the lateral side. Int Orthop. 2021;45(9):2365–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05164-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rauer T, Twerenbold R, Flückiger R et al. Avulsion fracture of the Calcaneal Tuberosity: Case Report and Literature Review.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018, 57(1):191–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.07.016.

  24. Kazushige Y, Kentaro K, Tsutomu A. Avulsion fracture of the Calcaneus treated with a Soft Anchor Bridge and lag screw technique: a report of two cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(2):310–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nickil A, Paul F. Calcaneal tuberosity fixation using a Locking Compression Hook plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(4):891–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Giordano V, Godoy-Santos AL, de Souza FS, et al. Combined lag screw and cerclage wire fixation for Calcaneal Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures. Case Rep Orthop. 2018;2018:6207024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6207024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Khazen GE, Wilson AN, Ashfaq S, et al. Fixation of calcaneal avulsion fractures using screws with and without suture anchors: a biomechanical investigation. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(11):1183–6. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.1183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lui TH. Avulsion fracture of the posterosuperior tuberosity of the calcaneus managed with lag screw fixation. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24(1):45–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2016.11.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blum LE, Hundal R, Walton D, et al. Percutaneous fixation of Calcaneal Tuberosity Avulsion fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(Suppl 1):44–S45. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miyamura S, Ota H, Okamoto M et al. Surgical Treatment of Calcaneal Avulsion Fracture in Elderly Patients using cannulated can cellous screws and Titanium Wire. J Foot Ankle Surg 2016 Jan-Feb;55(1):157–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.08.008.

  31. Eren A, Cift H, Özkan K, et al. Transverse incision for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(1):133–4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2011.10.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Redfern DJ, Oliveira ML, Campbell JT, et al. A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates for the fixation of calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Athavale SA, Joshi SD, Joshi SS. Internal architecture of calcaneus: correlations with mechanics and pathoanatomy of calcaneal fractures[ J]. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32:115–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Biz C, Barison E, Ruggieri P, et al. Radiographic and functional outcomes after displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a comparative cohort study among the traditional open technique (ORIF) and percutaneous surgical procedures (PS). J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0426-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee SM, Huh SW, Chung JW, et al. Avulsion fracture of the calcaneal tuberosity: classification and its characteristics. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(2):134–8. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2012.4.2.134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Ningbo Medical Science and Technology Project (2021Y56).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WGL and DX provided major contributions to writing and editing the manuscript. MIN L and ML participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. JMC supervised the writing of the manuscript. WGL, MIN L and DX interpreted the radiologic results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ding Xu or Jianming Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ningbo No.6 Hospital (L2022062). And written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All the authors do not have any possible conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lou, W., Liu, M., Xu, D. et al. Outcomes of U-shaped internal fixation in the treatment of avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 408 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06542-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06542-3

Keywords