Table 4 Degree of methodological quality and risk of bias
Authors (year) | Methodological quality (%) | Risk of bias |
|---|---|---|
Ribeiro et al., 2016 [15] | 45,4 | High (Up to 49%) |
Oliveira and Silva 2017 [9] | 54,5 | Moderate (50 the 69%) |
Silva-Filho et al., 2018 [16] | 54,5 | Moderate (50 the 69%) |
Coutinho 2018 [17] | 63,6 | Moderate (50 the 69%) |
Oliveira 2020 [18] | 63,6 | Moderate (50 the 69%) |
Neumann et al., 2019 [19] | 63,6 | Moderate (50 the 69%) |
Siqueira et al., 2019 [20] | 72,7 | Low (above 70%) |
Neumann et al., 2019 [21] | 72,7 | Low (above 70%) |
Oliveira et al., 2019 [22] | 72,7 | Low (above 70%) |
Silva et al., [23] | 72,7 | Low (above 70%) |
Tenório et al., 2020 [24] | 72,7 | Low (above 70%) |
Souza et al., 2021 [25] | 72,7 | Low (above 70%) |
Almeida et al., 2021 [26] | 72,7 | Low (above 70%) |