Author (year) | Participants | Outcomes and instruments | Intervention | Effects found (From according to the numbering of outcomes) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ribeiro et al., 2016 [15] | Case report (n = 1) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Quality of life (SF-36). | Duration: ten sessions. Protocol: ultrasound continuous with a frequency of 1 MHz, Infrared Laser with a dosage of 4 J and 3s per dot; TENS-burst with a pulse width of 250 us and a frequency of 2 Hz. | 1) Reduction of pain measured using the VAS instrument; 2) Improved quality of life measured using the SF-36 instrument. |
Oliveira and Silva [9] | Case report (n = 1) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Range of motion (goniometer); 3) Muscle strength (TEM); 4) Edema (perimetry); 5) Capacity functional (TC10), Quick dash12 and Lequesne Scales version in Portuguese, for the upper and lower limbs, respectively. | Duration: four weeks, one turn per week. Protocol: Kinesiotherapy classical and manual therapy. | 1) Reduction of pain measured using the VAS instrument; 2) There was no improvement in range of motion measured by goniometry; 3) There was no improvement in muscle strength measured by the TEM instrument; 4) No improvement was observed in edema measured using the perimetry instrument; 5) There was an improvement in the functional capacity measured using the TC10 instrument. |
Silva-Filho et al., 2018 [16] | tDCS group (n = 10) sham -tDCS group (n = 10) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS; BPI); 2) Quality of life (SF-36) | Duration: Five days consecutive; Protocol: stimulation current transcranial _ direct (tDCS) with current 2 mA constant for 20 min (30 s ramp-down); Sham - tDCS with current 2 mA constant was delivered only for 30 s (10 s ramp-up) of the 20 min | 1) Reduction of pain measured using the VAS and BPI instruments; 2) Improved quality of life measured using the SF-36 instrument. |
Coutinho et al., 2018 [17] | Group in phase acute / subacute (n = 59) Group in phase chronic (n = 43) | 1) Pain Intensity (NPRS); 2) assessment of mobility and balance (TUG); 3) Functional capacity (SPPB). | Duration: Five weeks; Protocol: auriculotherapy in points specific acupuncture and _ auriculotherapy sham em points no specific. | 1) Pain reduction was not observed using the NPRS instrument; 2) Improvement in balance and mobility measured using the TUG instrument; 3)Improvement of functional capacity through the SPPB instrument. |
Oliveira, et al., 2019 [18] | Intervention group Pilates method (n = 22) Control group (n = 20) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Quality of life (SF-36); 3) Range of motion (goniometry and flexibility test with wells bank). | Duration: 24 sessions, twice per week; Protocol: Pilates method one series of 6 to 12 repetitions; the training he was Divided in training A (22 exercises) and training B (18 exercises ). | 1) Reduction of pain observed through the VAS instrument; 2) Improvement in quality of life observed through the SF-36 instrument; 3) Improvement in range of motion observed through goniometry and flexibility test. |
Neumann et al., 2019 [19] | Exercise resisted (GER) (n = 15) Control (GC) (n = 16) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Quality of life (SF-36); 3) Functional capacity (40mWT); (TSL30s); (TSD4d); (DASH); 4) perception of treatment (PGIC). | Duration: 24 sessions twice per week; Protocol: Resistance exercises _ elastic with intensity load moderate and progressive, evaluated through testing a repetition maximum. | 1) Reduction of pain observed through the VAS instrument; 2) Improvement in quality of life observed through the SF-36 instrument; 3) Improvement of functional capacity observed through the instruments 40mWT, TSL30s, TSD4d, DASH; 4) Improvement of the perception of the patient’s treatment through the PGIC instrument. |
Siqueira, et al., 2019 [20] | They were accompanied (n = 35) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); | Duration: Six sessions; Protocol: Auriculotherapy with mustard seeds and tape adhesive in points with effect painkiller. | 1) Reduction of pain observed through the VAS instrument; |
Neumann et al., 2019 [21] | Exercise resisted (GER) (n = 15) and Control (GC) (n = 16) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Quality of life (SF-36); 3) Functional capacity (TC40m; TSL30s; TSD4d; DASH); 4) perception of treatment (PGIC). | Duration: 24 sessions to the over 12 weeks; Protocol: exercise with resistance elastic with intensity load moderate and progressive, evaluated through testing a repetition maximum | 1) Reduction of pain observed through the VAS instrument; 2) Improvement in quality of life observed through the SF-36 instrument; 3) Improvement of functional capacity observed through the instruments 40mWT, TSL30s, TSD4d, DASH; 4) Improvement of the perception of the patient’s treatment through the PGIC instrument. |
Oliveira [22] | Pilates group (n = 26) one group control (n = 25) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Quality of life (SF-12); 3) Range of motion (Goniometry) 4) Capacity functional (HAQ) | Duration: 24 sessions twice per week; Protocol: Mat Pilates Method 50 min. | 1) Reduction of pain observed through the VAS instrument; 2) Improvement in quality of life observed through the SF-12 instrument; 3) Improvement in range of motion observed through goniometry; 4) Improvement of functional capacity observed through the HAQ instrument. |
Silva et al., 2020 [23] | They were selected (n = 21) | (1) Peroxidation lipid; (2) Protein oxidation; 3) Antioxidant system no enzymatic | Duration: 12 training sessions, lasting 40 min; Protocol: Exercise physicists with intensity of 50–70% of the frequency cardiac maximum | 1) Improvement of lipid peroxidation processes observed through laboratory tests; 2) Improvement in protein oxidation observed through laboratory testing; 3) There was improvement in the non-enzymatic antioxidant system observed through laboratory tests. |
Tenório et al., 2020 [24] | Case reports (n = 2) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Quality of life (SF-36) | Duration: 14 sessions; Protocol: Electrothermotherapy, kinesiotherapy and manual therapy | 1) Reduction of pain observed through the VAS instrument; 2) Improvement in quality of life observed through the SF-36 instrument. |
Souza et al., 2021 [25] | Activate-tDCS (n = 29) sham-t DCS (n = 30) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Capacity functional (HAQ) | Duration: 6 sessions, two weeks; Protocol: stimulation with an anode placed at M1 region and the cathode over the supraorbital region | 1) Reduction of pain observed through the VAS instrument; 2) Improvement of functional capacity observed through the HAQ instrument. |
Almeida et al. 2021 [26] | Sample composed by (n = 21) | 1) Pain intensity (VAS); 2) Quality of life (SF-36); 3) Range of motion and ability functional (Goniometry); 4) strength of grip (hand dynamometry) | Duration: ten sessions; Protocol: mobilizations joints, stretching, exercises Resumen aerobic, active-resisted, active - free and resource electrothermotherapeutics | 1) Reduction of pain observed through the VAS instrument; 2) Improvement in quality of life observed through the SF-36 instrument. 3) Improvement in range of motion observed through goniometry and flexibility test; 4) Increase in grip strength observed using a hand dynamometry. |