Skip to main content

The use of intraoperative cell salvage in total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy for the treatment of high hip dislocation: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is an important component of blood management in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. However, the role of ICS is less well defined in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (SSO) which is a common surgical technique to manage high hip dislocation. This study aimed to determine the effect of ICS during THA with SSO and to identify factors associated with the ability to salvage sufficient collection for reinfusion in patients with high hip dislocation.

Methods

We identified 178 patients who underwent THA with SSO for high hip dislocation between November 2010 and April 2021. The consecutive cohort was analyzed by logistic regression to determine the effect of ICS on postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) and to explore the associations between patient demographics, clinical and radiographic characteristics, preoperative laboratory examination, and surgical variables with the ability to generate adequate blood salvage to reinfuse.

Results

In the consecutive cohort of 178 patients, cell salvage was reinfused in 107 patients (60.1%) and postoperative allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion within 3 days of implantation was administrated in 40 patients (22.5%). In multivariate analysis, the reinfusion of ICS (OR (95%CI) 0.17 (0.07–0.47)), center of rotation (COR) height ≥ 60 mm (OR (95%CI) 3.30 (1.21–9.01)), the length of SSO ≥ 30 mm (OR (95%CI) 2.75 (1.05–7.22)) and the use of drainage (OR (95%CI) 2.28 (1.04–5.03)) were identified as independent factors of postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion. In addition, the following variables were identified as independent factors associated with the ability to generate sufficient blood salvage volume for reinfusion: COR height ≥ 60 mm (OR (95%CI) 3.47 (1.58–7.61)), limb-length discrepancy (LLD) ≥ 25 mm (OR (95%CI) 2.55 (1.15–5.65)) and length of SSO ≥ 30 mm (OR (95%CI) 2.75 (1.33–5.69)).

Conclusions

ICS was efficacious in reducing the exposure rate of postoperative RBC transfusion for high hip dislocation during THA with SSO. In addition, patients with greater COR height, larger LLD, and longer length of SSO were predisposed to generate sufficient collection for reinfusion in THA with SSO.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

High hip dislocation (Crowe type III and IV) secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most challenging types of hip deformity to reconstruct. Anatomic reconstruction of the hip rotation center is considered the gold standard treatment for high hip dislocation [1]. Normally restoration of the hip rotation center into the anatomic acetabulum requires total hip arthroplasty (THA) combined with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (SSO) to decrease the risk for nerve stretching [2,3,4]. However, THA combined with SSO is a demanding surgical technique with substantial intraoperative blood loss and high rate of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion [2,3,4]. It was reported that perioperative blood loss of THA with SSO could reach over 1000 ml with an average of 2 units of allogeneic RBC transfusion [5]. Allogeneic blood transfusion has been reported to be an independent risk factor associated with mortality and complication such as surgical-site infection and venous thrombosis [6, 7]. Effective methods are used to reduce exposure to allogeneic transfusion including hypotensive anesthesia, antifibrinolytic therapy, and cell salvage system [8,9,10].

Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) provides an efficacious approach to decrease the exposure of allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) in THA [10]. However, there are no published data regarding the role of ICS in THA combined with SSO. In addition, a recent meta-analysis has reported that ICS reduced neither the rate nor the volume of allogeneic RBC transfusion in THA [11]. Therefore, the exact effect of ICS should be defined. Furthermore, resources and effectiveness also need to be considered in the use of ICS. Adequate blood for processing and reinfusion was collected intraoperatively in only part of the patients due to the administration of antifibrinolytic therapy and intraoperative blood pressure control [8, 9]. A prior study reported that sufficient blood for reinfusion was salvaged in only half of all patients during aseptic elective hip revision arthroplasty [12]. Therefore, it is critical to target patients who are most likely to benefit from ICS for the purpose of management-related decision-making.

The aims of the study were (1) to determine whether the use of ICS could reduce the rate of postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion in patients who received THA with SSO and (2) to identify potential preoperative factors associated with the ability to salvage sufficient blood to permit processing and reinfusion during THA combined with SSO.

Methods

Patients

This study has been approved by the Clinical Trials and Biomedical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR2200064064). Between November 2010 and April 2021, data on consecutive patients who were diagnosed with Type-III or IV DDH based on Crowe classification and underwent cementless THA combined with SSO in our institution were retrospectively collected in our institution. The exclusion criteria comprised patients who (1) underwent THA combined with SSO due to high hip dislocation secondary to pyogenic arthritis; (2) underwent operative intervention for the purpose of treating DDH before THA combined with SSO; (3) had dysfunction of thromboembolism or underwent preoperative anticoagulation therapy (excluding aspirin); (4) received ABT intraoperatively or refused ABT perioperatively; (5) did not follow the routine practices of tranexamic acid and hypotensive anesthesia in our institution: tranexamic acid was given intravenously 2 g 5 min before incision, and administrated 1 g 3 and 6 h after the surgery; maintaining the systolic blood pressure at 90–100 mmHg during the operation.

Surgery and management

We used cementless femoral and acetabular prostheses for all patients. All surgeries were designed with transparencies as Krych described [13]. If the affected leg would be lengthened by > 3–4 cm in preoperative measurement, the SSO was administrated to avoid nerve stretching. All patients received general anesthesia, posterolateral approach, and transverse SSO as Wang et al. described [14]. Normally, a transverse femoral osteotomy was conducted approximately 8–10 cm distal to the tip of the greater trochanter to remove the obstruction of the proximal femoral part. The short section of the vastus lateralis was lifted to access the subtrochanteric area. Then proximal femoral fragment was translated anteriorly to expose the true acetabulum which was further reamed to prepare a socket for acetabular components. The press-fit technique was used in all implantation of the acetabular (Pinnacle, DePuy) with two or three screws to improve primary stability. Structural autograft or titanium alloy (Ti-alloy) mesh was used to increase coverage if necessary. Then the second transverse subtrochanteric osteotomy was conducted as previously planned. The femoral canal was reamed sequentially to get appropriate femoral component size. If reduction with trials could not be achieved, an additional transverse osteotomy was performed to facilitate the hip reduction in the true acetabulum. The straight stem (S-ROM, DePuy) was inserted at 15° to 20° of anteversion in all patients by adjusting the rotational alignment of the 2 fragments. Eventually, C-arm X-ray was used to ensure the position of the femoral and acetabular prosthesis.

Intraoperative cell salvage collection system (3000P, Jingjing Medical Equipment, Beijing, China) was used for all patients. Any fluid visibly contaminated was not salvaged. According to the result of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (HCT) in intraoperative blood gas analysis, the automatic (medium speed) program was started to process and reinfuse salvaged blood cells with an HCT of 30–40% once estimated blood loss exceeded 500 ml. In consistent with the perioperative transfusion guidelines of the Chinese Ministry of Health, allogeneic RBC transfusion was indicated for a Hb level of < 70 g/L, except for patients with any anemia-related organ dysfunction or intolerable symptoms of anemia [15].

Assessments

The clinical and radiographic variables in this study are reported in Table 1. All demographic data were collected including age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and tobacco use. Clinical evaluations were conducted preoperatively including the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, Crowe classification, range of hip motion, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and limb-length discrepancy (LLD) [16, 17]. The limb-length discrepancy (LLD) was measured by calculating the difference of distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the medial malleolus between lower extremities [18]. The radiographic data of X-ray included preoperative femoral offset (FO) and center of rotation (COR) height (Fig. 1). The FO was defined as the perpendicular distance between the center of rotation and the axis of the femoral shaft [19]. The COR height was defined as the perpendicular distance between the center of rotation and the interteardrop line [20]. The intraoperative variables were obtained from patient medical records including the length of SSO, the use of drainage, the duration of operation, the volume of reinfusion from blood salvage, intraoperative complication (intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture), and postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion (rates and units) within 3 days of implantation. In addition, the preoperative blood examinations were also recorded including Hb, HCT, platelet (PLT), prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The center of rotation (COR) height and femoral offset (FO) were measured on the AP pelvic radiograph. The COR height (ab): the perpendicular distance between the center of rotation and the interteardrop line. FO (ac): the perpendicular distance between the center of rotation and the axis of the femoral shaft

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of all recruited patients. Values are mean (range) or number

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were executed using SPSS v25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Continuous variables were expressed as mean with range and compared using an unpaired 2-tailed t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors of postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusions within 3 days of implantation and the ability for reinfusion from ICS. In all logistic regression analyses, continuous variables were categorized by their median to relax the linear relationship assumptions. All variables associated with postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusions and the ability for reinfusion from ICS at a significant level in the univariate logistic regression analysis were candidates for stepwise multivariate analysis. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was considered statistical significance.

Results

Patients’ demographics

We initially identified a total of 216 patients who received THA combined with SSO for high hip dislocation. Of these, patients who underwent THA with SSO due to pyogenic arthritis (n = 19), those who had received operative intervention for the purpose of treating DDH (n = 4), those who underwent preoperative anticoagulation therapy (n = 3), those who revived ABT intraoperatively or refused ABT perioperatively (n = 5), and those who did not follow the routine practices of TXA and hypotensive anesthesia in our institution (n = 7) were excluded. The final cohort consisted of 178 patients was included: patients who received reinfusion of ICS (n = 107) and those who receive ICS without sufficient collection for reinfusion (n = 71). To further display the feature of the cohort, we divided the cohort into the reinfusion and non-reinfusion groups (Table 1).

Allogeneic blood transfusions and independent risk factors

In total, 40/178 (22.5%) patients received postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion up to 3 days after implantation: 18/107 (16.8%) in the reinfusion group, and 22/71 (31.0%) in the non-reinfusion group. The rate of postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion was significantly lower in patients who received reinfusion of ICS than in the non-reinfusion group (P = 0.029). The majority of allogeneic RBC (29/40, 72.5%) was transfused on postoperative day 1. There was no difference in the number of patients who received postoperative fresh frozen plasma transfusion between the two groups. In addition, there was also no significant difference between the 2 groups in the volume of postoperative allogeneic RBC and fresh frozen plasma transfusion per case (2.7 units vs. 2.5 units, P = 0.368; 320 ml vs. 314.3 ml, P = 0.771). The intraoperative factors and postoperative results related to ABT are also shown in Table 1. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the reinfusion of ICS, BMI ≥ 20.5 kg/m2, the COR height ≥ 60 mm, the length of SSO ≥ 30 mm, and the use of drainage were associated with postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion. The results of univariate analysis of postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion are shown in Table 2. After adjustment for covariates with the use of the multivariate logistic model, the reinfusion of ICS (OR (95%CI) 0.17 (0.07–0.47)), the COR height ≥ 60 mm (OR (95%CI) 3.30 (1.21–9.01)), the length of SSO (OR (95%CI) 2.75 (1.05–7.22)) and the use of drainage (OR (95%CI) 2.28 (1.04–5.03)) were identified as independent factors associated with postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis are also summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusions in the Cohort

Salvaging sufficient blood for reinfusion and independent risk factors

Except for the length of SSO which can be estimated before surgery, all variables used in this analysis were based on the data obtained preoperatively. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the COR height ≥ 60 mm, LLD ≥ 25 mm, and the length of SSO ≥ 30 mm were associated with the ability to salvage sufficient blood for reinfusion. The results of univariate logistic analysis are presented in Table 3. On multivariate analysis, COR height ≥ 60 mm (OR (95%CI) 3.47 (1.58–7.61)), LLD ≥ 25 mm (OR (95%CI) 2.55 (1.15–5.65)) and the length of SSO ≥ 30 mm (OR (95%CI) 2.75 (1.33–5.69)) were independently associated with the ability for reinfusion from ICS (Table 3).

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of salvaging sufficient blood for reinfusion in the Cohort

Discussion

In our study, the reinfusion of autologous blood from ICS significantly reduced the exposure rate of postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion within 3 days of implantation in patients who received THA combined with SSO for high hip dislocation. In addition, approximately 40% of patients could not produce sufficient blood salvage volume for reinfusion during THA combined with SSO. Our study suggested that LLD, COR height, and length of SSO were identified as independent factors associated with the ability to salvage sufficient blood for reinfusion.

Due to more restrictive transfusion thresholds, several large randomized controlled trials have indicated that cell salvage could neither reduce the need for allogeneic RBC transfusion nor improve the overall cost-effectiveness in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures [21, 22]. However, there are no published data regarding the role of ICS in THA combined with SSO. With sufficient blood collected for processing and reinfusion, the risk of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion within 3 days of implantation was significantly reduced in this study. Similar clinical outcomes have also been reported in previous reports regarding THA revision; Liu et al. found that ICS could reduce the exposure of postoperative ABT in patients receiving second-stage reimplantation for the treatment of chronic hip periprosthetic joint infection, and Palmer et al. reported that the reinfusion of ICS equated to nearly one unit of packed RBC each patient in revision hip arthroplasty [23, 24]. In this study, we also found that the use of drainage increased the risk of postoperative RBC transfusion in patients who received THA with SSO. Several previous randomized controlled trials reported that closed-suction drainage could eliminate the tamponade effect to increase the rate of homologous blood transfusion which was further confirmed in the present study [25, 26].

Not all patients could be collected adequate blood for the re-transfusion system during THA with SSO. For example, adequate blood for reinfusion was collected in only 40% of patients during the revision hip arthroplasty [27]. Therefore, the importance of appropriate case selection should be emphasized to help allocate cell salvage when there was limited resources. The ability to salvage enough blood for process and reinfusion was largely hinged on the volume of intraoperative blood loss [24]. The decision to use ICS ought to be anticipated preoperatively according to the information available. In the present study, greater COR height was proved to enhance the ability to collect adequate blood for reinfusion in THA combined with SSO. Severe morphologic consequences of great rotation center height could result in extensive soft tissue injury during the surgery and require long operation time, which could produce more intraoperative blood loss for ICS [28]. However, no association was found between the reinfusion from ICS and the Crowe classification. The possible interpretations might include the following: first, the sample size of Crowe type III patients included in this study was still small limiting the analysis and the included patients might not be that representative; second, since the Crowe classification is based on the percentage of dislocation height to pelvic height, this standardization of Crowe classification in terms of the degree of hip dislocation made it unsuitable for individualized assessment of blood loss.

In addition, the longer length of SSO was also found to be an independent factor of the ability for reinfusion in this study. Although the length of SSO was not a preoperative variable, it was supposed to be planned according to the measurement and calculation of X-ray film. A previous study has reported that longer length of SSO was associated with more intraoperative blood loss [29]. The exposure of the femoral shaft with long incision and muscle release around the thigh increased the chance of reinfusion. In addition, the length of SSO was also affected by the soft tissue condition around the hip. Muscle contracture caused by developmental deformities might require longer length of SSO to avoid nerve stretching and to facilitate hip joint reduction [13]. Therefore, to make accurate decision, it was necessary to calculate the length of osteotomy preoperatively according to comprehensive evaluation of patients.

There was no report on the association between LLD and the ability for reinfusion from ICS. Fujimaki et al. reported that the clinical outcomes of patients with postoperative LLD of < 5 mm were superior to those of patients with postoperative LLD of ≥ 5 mm [30]. Therefore, one of the surgical purposes was leg length correction which required extending the affected limb without stretching nerves. In addition, the formation of LLD was complex: Sugano et al. reported that patients with chronic dislocated hips normally had a smaller diameter of the femoral head and shorter femoral neck than normal population [31]; Zhang et al. found that most DDH patients developed LLD due to greater ipsilateral tibial length, skeletal limb length, and lesser trochanter-tibial plafond distance [32]. Thus, to correct skeletal lower limb length, demanding surgical technique was requisite including extensive tissue release of pelvifemoral muscles such as iliopsoas and repeated attempts of hip reduction in the anatomic acetabulum [33]. Those operative procedures could prolong the operation duration and generate sufficient blood salvage volume. One particular advantage of the present study was that it took into account not only radiographic and operative variables but also a wide array of other variables previously reported to be associated with intraoperative blood loss. Greenky et al. reported that elder population produced less amount of salvaged blood [12]; Palmer et al. found that males generated more volumes of autologous blood for reinfusion than females because of greater circulating volumes in males [24]. However, our study suggested that patient factors were not independent determinants of the ability to salvage enough blood for reinfusion. Similarly, preoperative Hb, PLT, and coagulation function were also not associated with the ability to collect sufficient blood for reinfusion. Those results might be explained by the fact that high hip dislocation secondary to DDH was more common in young females which made previously reported factors relatively homogenous [34].

Our study has several strengths. First, we confirmed the effect of ICS on postoperative ABT in patients who underwent THA with SSO for high hip dislocation, which could not only help clinical decision-making but also enable patients to actively cooperate with surgeons by enhancing patients’ cognition. Second, our study also found the association between several risk factors and the ability to generate adequate blood salvage for reinfusion which could optimize the resources and efficiency by targeting patients who are most likely to benefit from ICS during THA combined with SSO. In addition, since the risk factors identified in the present study might influence perioperative blood management, clinicians should emphasize the physical examination and the measurement of X-ray film in this specific situation where severe deformities of lower extremities are usually present [32]. Several limitations existed in the present study. First, this analysis was based on data from single institution. Although we recognized there were numerous differences between patients and institutions, the results of our study could provide surgical teams with an estimation of the reinfusion from ICS for THA with SSO. Second, a prospective study with more fastidious suctioning was required to further confirm the reliability of our outcomes. Third, the sample size was still small which could limit some analyses. Finally, the data on certain factors, such as the deformity of acetabulum and i.v. fluid therapy, was unavailable; therefore, the effect or potential incorporation could not be assessed.

Conclusion

The use of ICS was an effective blood conservation strategy during THA with SSO for the treatment of high hip dislocation secondary to DDH, which could decrease the exposure rate of postoperative RBC transfusion. After adjusting for other potentially important confounding factors, we demonstrated that the ability to salvage sufficient blood for reinfusion was associated with the COR height, LLD, and length of SSO. Our findings might help clinical decision-making in the context of resource utilization.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ICS:

intraoperative cell salvage

THA:

total hip arthroplasty

SSO:

subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy

ABT:

allogeneic blood transfusion

RBC:

red blood cell

BMI:

body mass index

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

HHS:

Harris Hip Score

ROM:

range of motion

LLD:

leg length discrepancy

FO:

femoral offset

COR:

center of rotation

Hb:

hemoglobin

HCT:

hematocrit

PLT:

platelet

APTT:

activated partial thromboplastin time

PT:

prothrombin time

SSO:

subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy

RBC:

red blood cell

References

  1. Zeng WN, Liu JL, Jia XL, Zhou Q, Yang L, Zhang Y. Midterm results of total hip arthroplasty in patients with high hip dislocation after suppurative hip arthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(1):102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caylak R, Ors C, Togrul E. Minimum 10-Year results of Cementless Ceramic-On-Ceramic total hip arthroplasty performed with transverse Subtrochanteric Osteotomy in Crowe Type IV hips. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(10):3519–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sofu H, Kockara N, Gursu S, Issin A, Oner A, Sahin V. Transverse Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy during Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Crowe Type-III or IV Developmental Dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(6):1019–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zagra L, Bianchi L, Mondini A, Ceroni RG. Oblique femoral shortening osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for high dislocation in patients with hip dysplasia. Int Orthop. 2015;39(9):1797–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park CW, Lim SJ, Cha YT, Park YS. Total hip arthroplasty with Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy in patients with high hip dislocation secondary to Childhood Septic Arthritis: a matched comparative study with Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(1):204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JL, Park JH, Han SB, Cho IY, Jang KM. Allogeneic blood transfusion is a significant risk factor for Surgical-Site infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a Meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(1):320–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fowler AJ, Ahmad T, Phull MK, Allard S, Gillies MA, Pearse RM. Meta-analysis of the association between preoperative anaemia and mortality after surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102(11):1314–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee YC, Park SJ, Kim JS, Cho CH. Effect of tranexamic acid on reducing postoperative blood loss in combined hypotensive epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia for total hip replacement. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25(5):393–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu X, Liu J, Sun G. A comparison of combined intravenous and topical administration of tranexamic acid with intravenous tranexamic acid alone for blood loss reduction after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;41:34–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith LK, Williams DH, Langkamer VG. Post-operative blood salvage with autologous retransfusion in primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(8):1092–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Bodegom-Vos L, Voorn VM, So-Osman C, Vliet Vlieland TP, Dahan A, Koopman-van Gemert AW, Vehmeijer SB, Nelissen RG. Marang-van de Mheen PJ: cell salvage in hip and knee arthroplasty: a Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(12):1012–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenky M, Shaner J, Rasouli MR, Han SB, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ. Intraoperative blood salvage in revision total hip arthroplasty: who benefits most? J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(6):1298–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krych AJ, Howard JL, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Berry DJ. Total hip arthroplasty with shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy in Crowe type-IV developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(9):2213–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang D, Li DH, Li Q, Wang HY, Luo ZY, Yang Y, Pei FX, Zhou ZK. Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy during cementless total hip arthroplasty in young patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang D, Wang HY, Luo ZY, Pei FX, Zhou ZK, Zeng WN. Finding the optimal regimen for oral tranexamic acid administration in primary total hip arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(5):438–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS. Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(1):15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang D, Zeng WN, Qin YZ, Pei FX, Wang HY, Zhou ZK. Long-term results of Cementless Total hip arthroplasty for patients with high hip dislocation after Childhood Pyogenic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(10):2420–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bicanic G, Delimar D, Delimar M, Pecina M. Influence of the acetabular cup position on hip load during arthroplasty in hip dysplasia. Int Orthop. 2009;33(2):397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Traina F, De Fine M, Biondi F, Tassinari E, Galvani A, Toni A. The influence of the centre of rotation on implant survival using a modular stem hip prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1513–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Horstmann WG, Kuipers BM, Slappendel R, Castelein RM, Kollen BJ, Verheyen CC. Postoperative autologous blood transfusion drain or no drain in primary total hip arthroplasty? A randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2012;36(10):2033–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. So-Osman C, Nelissen RG, Koopman-van Gemert AW, Kluyver E, Poll RG, Onstenk R, Van Hilten JA, Jansen-Werkhoven TM, van den Hout WB, Brand R, et al. Patient blood management in elective total hip- and knee-replacement surgery (part 1): a randomized controlled trial on erythropoietin and blood salvage as transfusion alternatives using a restrictive transfusion policy in erythropoietin-eligible patients. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(4):839–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Z, Yang X, Zhao EZ, Wan X, Cao G, Zhou Z. The use of cell salvage during second-stage reimplantation for the treatment of chronic hip periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmer AJR, Lloyd TD, Gibbs VN, Shah A, Dhiman P, Booth R, Murphy MF, Taylor AH. Kendrick BJL, collaborators: the role of intra-operative cell salvage in patient blood management for revision hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(4):479–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheung G, Carmont MR, Bing AJ, Kuiper JH, Alcock RJ, Graham NM. No drain, autologous transfusion drain or suction drain? A randomised prospective study in total hip replacement surgery of 168 patients. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(5):619–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Widman J, Jacobsson H, Larsson SA, Isacson J. No effect of drains on the postoperative hematoma volume in hip replacement surgery: a randomized study using scintigraphy. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73(6):625–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walsh TS, Palmer J, Watson D, Biggin K, Seretny M, Davidson H, Harkness M, Hay A. Multicentre cohort study of red blood cell use for revision hip arthroplasty and factors associated with greater risk of allogeneic blood transfusion. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(1):63–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hardt S, Hube R, Perka C. Total hip arthroplasty for high hip dislocation. Z Orthop Unfall. 2020;158(2):170–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao E, Liu Z, Ding Z, Luo Z, Li H, Zhou Z. A propensity score-matched analysis between patients with high hip dislocation after childhood pyogenic infection and Crowe IV developmental dysplasia of the hip in total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Fujimaki H, Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Tezuka T, Hirata Y, Saito T. Leg length discrepancy and lower limb alignment after total hip arthroplasty in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(6):969–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Soukka A, Alaranta H, Tallroth K, Heliovaara M. Leg-length inequality in people of working age. The association between mild inequality and low-back pain is questionable. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(4):429–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Z, Luo D, Cheng H, Xiao K, Zhang H. Unexpected long lower limb in patients with unilateral hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(5):388–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Atilla B. Reconstruction of neglected developmental dysplasia by total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1(3):65–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. de Hundt M, Vlemmix F, Bais JM, Hutton EK, de Groot CJ, Mol BW, Kok M. Risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165(1):8–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence of Sichuan University West China Hospital (grant number: ZYJC18039), the Regional Innovation & Cooperation program of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (grant number: 2021YFQ0028), West China Nursing Discipline Development Special Fund Project, Sichuan University (HXHL20003), and Key Research & Development program of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (grant number: 2021YFS0167).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have seen, edited, and approved the manuscript before submission. All authors contributed to the study design and conduct, data analysis, and writing and editing the manuscript. All data collected in this study have consent for publication. Enze Zhao and Xiaoyan Zhu contributed equally to this work and should be considered as equal first authors. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongke Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Clinical Trials and Biomedical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR2200064064; Date: 25/09/2022). All methods were carried out following relevant guidelines and regulations. All patients provided informed consent for participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, E., Zhu, X., Zhou, K. et al. The use of intraoperative cell salvage in total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy for the treatment of high hip dislocation: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 318 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06427-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06427-5

Keywords