Skip to main content

The application of a hollow trephine in femoral retrograde intramedullary nailing technique

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the use of a specially designed hollow trephine to create the entry point through the femoral condyle during retrograde interlocking intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures.

Methods

From June 2019 to December 2021, we treated 11 patients (5 men, 6 women; mean age, 64 years; age range 40–77 years) with mid-distal femoral fractures by retrograde intramedullary femoral nailing using a self-designed hollow trephine for femoral condyle reaming and cancellous bone harvesting. The mode of all the nails is static. Patients were followed up at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks and for at least 6 months after surgery. The healing process and heterotopic ossification were evaluated by imaging. Partial weight bearing was permitted during the recovery period and complete weight bearing was permitted after clinical healing of the fracture displayed by X-ray.

Results

The operation was successful in all patients. Over mean follow-up of 9.3 months (range, 6.0–12.0 months), all patients achieved clinical healing within three months. There were no complications such as knee joint infection, heterotopic ossification, knee joint adhesion and wedge effect.

Conclusion

The use of the hollow trephine during femoral retrograde intramedullary nailing helps avoid postoperative complications such as heterotopic ossification, knee joint adhesions, and wedge effect. It also facilitates bone graft harvesting.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

A fracture of the mid-distal femur is a common injury. For simple femoral shaft fractures, intramedullary nail fixation is the gold standard treatment [1]. Intramedullary nailing can be by the antegrade or retrograde technique. Retrograde intramedullary nailing is suitable for mid-distal extraarticular fractures (33-A) and sometimes also for simple articular fractures (33-C1, 33-C2). In the standard operation, the orthopedic surgeon cuts the knee capsule and uses a solid or hollow bit with a guide needle to open and expand the femoral condyle. Because the entrance of the retrograde intramedullary nail is located deep within the knee joint cavity, it is difficult to remove all the debris generated by the drilling procedure. The residual bone debris is an important cause of postoperative heterotopic ossification [2] and joint stiffness [3, 4]. Heterotopic ossification in patients with floating knee injury is significantly more common after retrograde intramedullary nailing than after antegrade intramedullary nailing.

The use of a hollow trephine instead of the ordinary solid reamer will allow removal the bone ring at the entry port with less generation of bone debris. The hollow trephine has been used during proximal femoral intramedullary nailing procedures [5]. Cepni et al. have also tried reaming with a manual trephine and closed the channel with a bone bolt after fixation [6]. We have designed a hollow trephine with limited depth measurement and used it during retrograde intramedullary femoral nailing in 11 patients. The purpose of this paper is to describe the application of the newly designed hollow trephine in retrograde intramedullary nailing of the femur.

Materials and methods

Patients

From June 2019 to December 2021, 11 patients with distal femoral fractures received femoral retrograde intramedullary nailing using the hollow trephine at our hospital. Imaging examinations were performed on all patients before surgery. All 11 patients had mid-lower femoral fractures. One patient also had a supracondylar femoral fracture and one had a patellar fracture. The injuries were sustained in traffic accidents (n = 5) or falls (n = 6). This study was approved by the local institutional review board, and all patients provided informed consent before surgery.

Design of the hollow trephine

The hollow trephine is made of medical-grade stainless steel and consists of two parts: a trephine bit and a trephine rod. The trephine bit has a serrated opening at the proximal end and holes on the side walls. The distal end is the trephine rod, which can be connected to the electric drill (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

 A: The hollow trephine consists of a trephine bit and a trephine rod

B: The serrations and holes at the side wall of the trephine bit

C: The guide pin with depth-limiting device and the trephine

Surgical technique

All operations were performed under general anesthesia. The skin was prepared and the area draped. A 3–4 cm longitudinal incision was made in the middle of the knee. If the incision is small, we incise the patellar tendon directly, and if the incision is large enough to place the retractor hook, we retract it to the side. With the knee joint flexed about 30°, the central pin with a depth-limiting device was inserted into the medullary canal. The position of the pin was checked on radiograph (Fig. 2). The guide pin was pushed forward, and the hollow trephine was connected to the drill bit to open the distal femur. Conventional reaming, closed reduction, pinning, and proximal and distal locking were performed, with fluoroscopy used to monitor pin position and satisfactory fracture reduction (Fig. 3). If fracture reduction was not satisfactory, open reduction was performed. Patients were followed up at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks and for at least 6 months after surgery. The healing process and heterotopic ossification were evaluated by imaging. Partial weight bearing was permitted during the recovery period and complete weight bearing was permitted after clinical healing of the fracture displayed by X-ray.

Fig. 2
figure 2

 A-E: Intraoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs show the application of a hollow trephine

F-I: The incision

J: The hollow trephine and harvested bone bolt

Fig. 3
figure 3

The hollow trephine can also be used in unilateral retractor-assisted surgery

A-D: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs showing intraoperative application of the hollow trephine

E, F: The use of a unilateral retractor. (the images provided in Fig. 3E are authors images)

G, H: Open-hole reaming of the distal femur using a hollow trephine

Results

A total of 11 patients (6 women, 5 men) with mid-distal femoral fractures underwent retrograde intramedullary nailing using the hollow trephine. The mean age of the patients was 64 years (age range, 40–77 years). Over mean follow-up of 9.3 months (range, 6–9 months), all patients, including one patient with bilateral femoral fractures, achieved clinical healing within three months (Fig. 4). There were no complications such as knee joint infection, stiffness, heterotopic ossification, knee joint adhesion, or wedge effect. Postoperatively, all patients achieved knee range of motion approximately 140° in flexion.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Application of a hollow trephine in a patient with bilateral femoral fractures

A-C: Preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior radiographs of a patient

D-G: Bone bolt obtained during surgery

Discussion

In this paper, we introduce the application of a hollow trephine to create the entry port during retrograde intramedullary nailing of mid-distal femoral fractures. We achieved good functional outcomes, with no complications, in all 11 patients treated by our technique. Compared with other traditional treatments, the use of a hollow trephine for surgery has many advantages. This is a practical surgical tip, which could reduce bone debris, harvest grafts and avoid the wedge effect.

Whether anterograde or retrograde intramedullary nailing is better for mid-distal femoral fractures has always been controversial. Some scholars worry that the retrograde approach interferes with the normal structure of the knee joint and leads to intra-articular adhesions and loss of knee joint function [7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, no knee adhesions or heterotopic ossification occurred in our small cohort, and functional outcome at end of follow-up was satisfactory in all eleven patients. In the absence of any other differences between our method and the standard technique, we believe that the use of a hollow trephine instead of the solid reamer was responsible for the reduced incidence of adhesions.

The hollow trephine has several benefits. It produces less bone debris than the traditional solid reamer. Bone debris is difficult to remove, and residual bone debris can lead knee joint adhesions and heterotopic ossification [13]. According to Furlong et al., reaming debris is an important cause of heterotopic ossification after femoral intramedullary nailing [14]. Further, Kantak et al. demonstrated that removal of bone debris by extensive irrigation with normal saline can reduce the incidence of heterotopic ossification [2]. Figure 5 shows many bone debris produced by the solid reamer opening and scatters it in the knee joint cavity. However, the hollow trephine produces little bone debris and a smooth bolt during opening (Fig. 5). Although bone debris is only one of many pathogenic factors, we believe that the use of the hollow trephine can help to reduce the incidence of postoperative knee adhesion and heterotopic ossification.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of the amount of bone debris produced by the ordinary solid reamer and a hollow trephine during hole opening in the femur of a pig

A: Two types reamers: ordinary solid reamer and hollow trephine

B: Many bone debris produced by solid reamer opening

C: The hollow trephine produces only little bone debris and a smooth bolt during opening

Another advantage of the hollow trephine is that it can be used for bone graft harvesting. Autologous bone graft is the best choice for limb reconstruction or fusion operation. Although the iliac crest is the most common site for harvesting bone graft material, it can only provide a limited amount of cancellous bone. Harvesting large amounts from the iliac crest can lead to severe pain and infection [15]. The femur is also a good source of bone graft. The reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) technique has been proposed as a method to obtain large bone grafts from the femur [16], and some orthopedists have successfully applied the technique in clinical practice [12, 17]. Liu et al. have reported the application of the hollow trephine for harvesting bone graft during the antegrade femoral nail procedure [5]. Several authors have also reported the use of RIA for retrograde femoral bone graft acquisition [18, 19]. Cepni et al. have used a manual trepan for reaming, which is a laborious process. Moreover, the lack of guide pin and depth-limiting device leads to the possibility of deflection of the opening direction [6]. The new trephine we designed is more accurate and not too deep under the guidance of the guide pin. Our in-house designed hollow trephines generate little debris in the joint cavity, but it provides a bone bolt that can be used to fill diaphyseal gaps and promote bone healing. Bone fragments produced during reaming have a similar transcriptional profile as bone grafts harvested from the ilium and these genes play important roles in bone repair [20]. If necessary, further intramedullary cancellous bone can be harvested using other tools when using retrograde intramedullary nails for revision surgery for nonunion/defect of femoral fractures. Tunnel preparation and harvesting could be finished during the reaming operation using the hollow trephine. In contrast, the scattered bone debris produced using the ordinary reamer opening is not only difficult to harvest and it also cannot be used for structural rebuilding. Bone bolt is a good source of bone graft, but all the cases in our study were closed reduction and bone graft was not used.

The hollow trephine also prevents the wedge effect. The wedge effect refers to femoral shaft lateralization and varus malalignment of the neck that occurs during insertion of the solid reamer in the proximal femur [11, 21]. Eceviz et al. called it the V-effect [22]. Various measures have been proposed for addressing the problem of the wedge effect, including percutaneously threaded steel wire clamping, clamp fixation, and the use of a trephine [11, 23]. The wedge effect can be observed when a solid reamer is used to create the opening during retrograde intramedullary nailing to fix a simple femoral intercondylar fracture (AO/OTA classification 33.B1). The standard conical reamer dissipates the stress at fracture site and do not remove enough bone from the entry point. The reamer/nail wedges fracture fragment apart, leading to malreduction of the articular surface. In contrast, the hollow trephine does not distract fracture site (Fig. 6). It prevents the wedge effect by removing a bone plug from the entry site. A standard channel allows for passage of the nail without any distracting force on the distal femur.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The use of a hollow trephine can avoid wedge effect

A: A simple femoral intercondylar fracture (AO/OTA classification 33.B1)

B: A triangular pyramid distracts fracture gap

C: The reamer wedges the fracture gap

D: With the same start point, the hollow trephine does not distract the fracture gap and avoids the “wedge effect”

Limitation

This study mainly summarizes the application of the new technique in a small sample of patients, without focusing too much on functional scores and prognosis. The comparative study on the effect of a hollow trephine and the solid reamer on knee function score after intramedullary nailing will be further summarized in the future.

Conclusions

The use of a hollow trephine instead of the solid reamer during the operation of retrograde intramedullary nailing of the femur can reduce bone debris, harvest bone graft, and avoid the wedge effect.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Matthews SJ, Nikolaou VS, Giannoudis PV. Innovations in osteosynthesis and fracture care. Injury. 2008;39(8):827–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kantak AP, Shah NN. Extensive Surgical Wound Lavage reduces the incidence and severity of heterotopic ossification in primary total hip replacement: a study of 175 hip replacements. Hip Pelvis. 2017;29(4):234–9. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.4.234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiggers JK, Helmerhorst GT, Brouwer KM, Niekel MC, Nunez F, Ring D. Injury complexity factors predict heterotopic ossification restricting motion after elbow trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(7):2162–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3304-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kent WT, Shelton TJ, Eastman J. Heterotopic ossification around the knee after tibial nailing and ipsilateral antegrade and retrograde femoral nailing in the treatment of floating knee injuries. Int Orthop. 2018;42(6):1379–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3845-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y, Zheng Y, Shen Z, Wang S, Wei X, Gu X, Zhan H, Kuang Y. Interlocking intramedullary nail fixation with additional bone grafting from trochanter via a femoral hollow trephine in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures: design and clinical application. Int Orthop. 2017;41(2):397–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3207-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cepni S, Veizi E, Erdogan Y, Sahin A, Firat A, Kilicarslan K. Closure of the femoral medullary canal after retrograde nailing using an in-situ osteochondral autograft-technical trick and a case series. Injury. 2022;53(2):798–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(3):161–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200103000-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray P, Bergin P, Labropoulos P, Gunther S. Retrograde femoral nailing and knee function.Orthopedics2008, 31(10).

  9. Andrzejewski K, Panasiuk M, Grzegorzewski A, Synder M. Comparison of knee function in patients with a healed fracture of the femoral shaft fixed with retrograde and antegrade intramedullary nailing. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2013;15(5):395–405. https://doi.org/10.5604/15093492.1084241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brewster J, Grenier G, Taylor BC, Carter C, Degenova D, Ebaugh MP, Halverson A. Long-term comparison of Retrograde and Antegrade femoral nailing. Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):e278–82. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20200415-04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Butler BA, Selley RS, Summers HD, Stover MD. Preventing Wedge deformities when treating intertrochanteric femur fractures with Intramedullary Devices: a technical tip. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(3):e112–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dehghan N, Schemitsch EH. Extended applications of the reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system. Injury. 2017;48(Suppl 1):47–S51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brumback RJ, Wells JD, Lakatos R, Poka A, Bathon GH, Burgess AR. Heterotopic ossification about the hip after intramedullary nailing for fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(7):1067–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Furlong AJ, Smith PVG. RM: Heterotopic ossification: a comparison between reamed and unreamed femoral nailing injury 1997, 28(1):9–14.

  15. Oliva F, Migliorini F, Cuozzo F, Torsiello E, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N. Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Traumatol. 2021;22(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00612-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gehweiler D, Schmitz N, Gueorguiev B, Zderic I, Grunwald L, Richards G, Wahnert D, Raschke MJ. 3D geometry of femoral reaming for bone graft harvesting. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17153. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95983-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Belthur MV, Conway JD, Jindal G, Ranade A, Herzenberg JE. Bone graft harvest using a new intramedullary system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(12):2973–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0538-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor B, Triplet J, Johnson D, Sharpe B, Sullivan B, Canini C. Retrograde femoral bone Graft Acquisition using the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2018;28(3):181–5. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2018027914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kovar FM, Wozasek GE. Bone graft harvesting using the RIA (reaming irrigation aspirator) system - a quantitative assessment. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011;123(9–10):285–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-011-1565-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sagi HC, Young ML, Gerstenfeld L, Einhorn TA, Tornetta P. Qualitative and quantitative differences between bone graft obtained from the medullary canal (with a Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator) and the iliac crest of the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(23):2128–35. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Malley MJ, Kang KK, Azer E, Siska PA, Farrell DJ, Tarkin IS. Wedge effect following intramedullary hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(10):1343–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2280-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eceviz E, Cevik HB. The V-effect in fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nails. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(3):102863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maupin JJ, Steinmetz RG, Hickerson LE. A Percutaneous Threaded Wire as a clamp technique for avoiding Wedge Deformity while nailing intertrochanteric femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(7):e276–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the whole team for their selfless dedication.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X. Yao: Performed the methodology, Wrote the original draft of the manuscript. H. Liu: Investigation and Wrote, Curated the data, Reviewed and edited the manuscript. M. Hu: Curated the data. C. Wang: Data curation. D. Liu: Carried out the project administration. J. Hu: Performed the visualization. J. Tang: Performed the Validation. Xiang Yao, Hongyuan Liu and Minjie Hu contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dejun Liu, Jianping Hu or Jilei Tang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This retrospective study has been approved by the ethical committee of the Affiliated People’ s Hospital of Jiangsu university.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

A statement to confirm

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, X., Liu, H., Hu, M. et al. The application of a hollow trephine in femoral retrograde intramedullary nailing technique. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 245 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06351-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06351-8

Keywords

  • Mid-distal femur fractures
  • The hollow trephine
  • Retrograde intramedullary nailing
  • Bone debris