Skip to main content

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the sacroiliac joint a retrospective case series



Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction is a common source of back pain. Recent evidence from different parts of the world suggest that cooled radiofrequency ablation of sacral nerves supplying the SI joints has superior pain alleviating properties than currently available treatment options for SI joint dysfunction.

Patients and methods

After obtaining institutional review board approval, the medical records of 81 patients who underwent cooled radiofrequency ablation in a single institution and by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. The recurrence of pain, progression to fusion and functional outcomes were noted. The patients were operated on between June 2020 and December 2021, they include 59 females and 22 males, the average age was 55.4 ± 17.3. Follow up was at least 6 months postoperative.


22 of the patients had previously underwent lumbar fusions. Follow up period ranged from 6 to 18 months. After radiofrequency ablation, 7 patients progressed to fusions, and 6 patients had to have the procedure done again to relieve their pain. Student t-test was used to compare between preoperative and postoperative values of NPRS (numerical pain rating score) and ODI (Oswestry disability index). It showed significance with P-value < 0.001 in both.


Sacroiliac joint radiofrequency ablation is a good option in the treatment of SI joint pain showing good results in the short term follow up period. It is a simple procedure that can be done in less than 30 min and is capable of providing significant pain relief for patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Peer Review reports


The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) connects the sacrum to the pelvis. Inflammation around that joint from various possible contributing factors such as trauma, pregnancy, and previous lumbar fusion, can cause significant pain and disability [1,2,3]. Currently, the management of SIJ pain consists of conservative therapy such as physiotherapy and medications [4]. The treatment can be escalated to corticosteroid injections, radiofrequency ablation or fusions [5, 6]. Unfortunately, there is lack of evidence to support one treatment as superior to all others [7]. Conventional radiofrequency ablation had variable degrees of success and it is believed to be due to the smaller treatment area produced with their probes as is demonstrated by multiple studies [8,9,10]. Thus, this limits their effectiveness to some degree in targeting the SIJ nerves with variable anatomy [11, 12].

Cooled radiofrequency ablation is a relatively new procedure that allows cooling of the probes which can achieve a larger tissue lesion area in comparison with its predecessor. This may in turn lead to better outcomes [13, 14].

Our study has one of the largest patient cohort in the literature, with up to 18 months follow-up using cooled radiofrequency ablation. Our aim is to report our results in terms of functional outcomes, therapy failure and recurrence of pain.

Patients and methods

After obtaining institutional review board approval, the medical records of 81 Australian patients who underwent cooled radiofrequency ablation in a single institution (Norwest private hospital, NSW) and by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively; recurrence of pain, progression to fusion and functional outcomes were noted. The patients were operated on between June 2020 and December 2021. Follow up was at least 6 months, and at most 18 months follow up. Selection criteria include intractable pain of more than 3 months duration, failure of conservative therapy, exclusion of other causes for the pain, positive SIJ provocative maneuvers (such as thigh thrust, Geanslen’s test, FABER test, distraction test, compression test, and sacral thrust), and SIJ intra-articular injection achieving more than 50% relief [1, 2]. Exclusion criteria were younger than 18 years of age, pregnancy, infection around surgical site and immunosuppression.

The intra-articular blocks were performed by the surgeon and included local anesthetic 1 mL bupivacaine without epinephrine, and corticosteroid (Dexamethasone 2 mg) injected in both upper and lower pole of SIJ. After the procedure, the patients were given a pain diary (Fig. 1) and reviewed 2 weeks afterwards.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pain diary

The cooled radiofrequency ablation system used, SInergyTM (Avanos Medical Australia Pty Ltd, Chatswood, Australia), consisted of nine probes that emit a current reaching and maintaining a temperature of 60 degrees Celsius for 2.5 min. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia and sedation using propofol. A high flow nasal cannula therapy was used to assure a good oxygen supply in the prone position. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is an oxygen supply system capable of delivering up to 100% humidified and heated oxygen at a flow rate of up to 60 L per minute. This accomplishes a reduction of nasopharyngeal airway resistance, leading to improved ventilation and oxygenation through the application of a positive pressure environment. In addition to providing positive pressure support to the nasopharynx, a high-flow nasal cannula creates a positive end-expiratory pressure to the lower airways. This effect acts similarly to continuous positive airway pressure support in that it applies a splinting force to keep alveolar airways from collapsing under increased surface tensile stresses during exhalation. Additionally, this allows for improved alveolar recruitment, increasing the effective available surface area within the lungs for gaseous diffusion both to and from the blood. Flow rate normally set at 20 L/min to start and titrated as required. It is now routinely used in theatre for pre-oxygenation of potentially difficult airways and for patients positioned prone for procedures requiring sedation.

During sedation, Propofol TCI (Schneider model) is titrated in 3 mcg/ml with supplemental opioids such as tramadol 50-100 mg and oxycodone2-4 mg plus a small dose of ketamine (20-30 mg). Doses would obviously be titrated to patient comorbidities. The post op medications consisted of Tapentadol IR 50-100 mg Q4hrly PRN.

Eight patients underwent bilateral procedures, while 73 had unilateral ablation. On the right side, 2,4:30 and 6 o’clock for S1 and S2, while S3 only 2, 4:30 o’clock were targeted (Fig. 2). Equivalent targeting on the left side lateral aspect of the foramen was performed. Furthermore, the L5 dorsal ramus on the affected side was targeted as well. Stimulation mode was used to ensure no motor nerves were affected prior to commencing the ablation. one millilitres of mixed local anesthetic, 0.5 mL bupivacaine without epinephrine, and 0.5mL corticosteroid (Dexamethasone 2 mg) were injected at each lesion site.

Data collected included demographics and past history of previous lumbar fusion. Results were considered in terms of relief of pain, recurrence of SIJ pain, and treatment progression to fusion. Pain was evaluated by using the pain diary, NPRS and ODI postoperatively. The provocative maneuvers were used to assess the pain relief.

Statistical analysis consisted of using student t-test in SPSS to compare the preoperative and the postoperative values of functional outcomes scores. (IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp)

Fig. 2
figure 2

right sacroiliac joint target lesion sites. On the right side, L5 dorsal ramus, 2,4:30 and 6 o’clock for S1 and S2, while S3 only 2, 4:30 o’clock were targeted. (with permission from Avanos)


Our series of 81 patients included 59 females and 22 males, with an average age of 55.4 ± 17.3 (Table 1). Twenty-two of the patients had previous lumbar fusions.

Table 1 patient demographics

After the procedure, 7 patients progressed to fusion and 6 patients had to have the procedure done again after at least a 9 month’s period to relieve their pain. Progression to fusion was due to failure of conservative management and the presence of a mechanical cause of the dysfunction such as instability or laxity, or overload of the joint by a previous fusion.

Pain relief was observed with the mean NPRS (numerical pain rating score) decreasing from 7.86 ± 1.48 to1.47 ± 1.37 at 1.5 months. Further pain relief was noted after the ODI (Oswestry disability index) score collected at 3 months postoperatively reduced from 43.3 to 10.67. It showed significance with P-value < 0.001 in both (Tables 2 and 3). On average, it took between two and six weeks for the full effect of the ablation to be apparent. Patients’ reported side effects (10%) include buttock soreness, patchy numbness across the buttocks, and neuropathic pain, all of which resolved within 6 weeks.

Table 2 NPRS preoperative (during initial consult in the clinic) and 1.5 months postoperative
Table 3 ODI preoperative (during initial consult in the clinic) and 3 months postoperative


This study has one of the largest cohorts in the literature. In our series, most patients were females (72.8%), and there was a high prevalence of previous lumbar fusion (27%). This prevalence is not clear, as a lumbar fusion may increase the presence of SIJ dysfunction, but also many patients may be misdiagnosed, especially those who have facet joint arthrosis and were not clinically examined specifically for SIJ dysfunction. The diagnosis in our patients was made after exclusion of other causes, positive provocative maneuvers and SIJ injection test. The pain significantly improved after the procedure as seen on the functional outcomes scores. Any side effects from the procedure resolved in 6 weeks.

Multiple authors have found significant benefits when using cooled radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of SIJ compared to the traditional method [8, 13, 15]. In a recent meta-analysis, most authors utilized an anesthetic block for the diagnosis of SIJ pain with variability in the pain relief cutoff threshold between 50 and 75% [15]. However, Cohen et al. showed there was no difference in the therapeutic benefit between the thresholds [16].

The posterior sacral network is made up from contributing branches from L4-L5 dorsal rami and S1 to S4 lateral branches [16,17,18,19]. Sometimes, even S5 can contribute to this network [18]. The SIJ innervation is subject to a lot of variation and this may lead to disparity in the expected outcomes.

One way to possibly improve the outcomes is to achieve a larger lesion size. In a recently published overview study of cooled radiofrequency ablation, it was noted that a larger lesion likely contributes to more denervation and reduced chance of missing the nerves[20]. The diameter of the area can be 2 mm in unipolar, 6 mm in bipolar radiofrequency and between 8 and 10 mm in cooled radiofrequency ablation [21, 22]. It was recently demonstrated on MRI that lesion size might be affected negatively by the proximity of the probes to bones, which can be an important factor in achieving better treatment results [23].

Furthermore, multiple recently published articles using SInergy™ demonstrate benefit in ODI, NPRS, and visual analog scale scores in these patients [24, 25] In a study by Cohen et al. they used a placebo group and they demonstrated significantly better results with radiofrequency compared to placebo[25]. While Stelzer et al. evaluated cooled radiofrequency ablation in sacroiliac joints in 126 patients with 20 months followup and assessment of functional scores; he noted a significant decrease of opioid use and pain scores [24]. They infiltrated with local anesthetic in both groups. Moreover, a randomized controlled trial compared cooled radiofrequency ablation to placebo and noted significant improvement in quality of life in the ablation group [26]. Additionally, patients with recurring symptoms treated with cooled radiofrequency ablation had significantly more benefits for longer duration the second time [27]. In our study, the use of corticosteroid may have contributed with an additional degree of relief in immediate postoperative period.

As for the secondary effects, the cause of the neuropathic pain and buttock numbness that occurs after ablation is likely due to the middle cuneal nerve, which is formed by sacral lateral branches [28]. The buttock soreness we believe is due to the dissipated heat (60 °C) and inflammatory reaction which causes the muscles to be tense.

The use of HFNC (high flow nasal cannula) has multiple advantages when compared to conventional oxygen therapy including the high-flow rates match the patient’s inspiratory flow rates, deliver a constant FiO2, increase the partial arterial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/FIO2 ratio, the inhaled heated and humidified gas can improve mucociliary motion and sputum clearance, reduced upper airway resistance, reduced work of breathing and amelioration of thoraco-abdominal synchrony [29].

We recognize that there are some limitations to this study. It is a retrospective review study, with no control groups. There was no traditional radiofrequency group to compare with, thus we cannot make a superiority claim of one modality over another. No serious complications were observed in the patients.


To conclude, this is one of the largest reported patient cohort showing significant improvement in functional outcomes with cooled radiofrequency ablation for the sacroiliac joint pain. It also notes that the procedure can be repeated with likely increased duration of pain relief.

Data Availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Numerical pain rating score


Oswestry disability index


Sacroiliac joint


  1. Maigne JY, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain.Spine. 1996 Aug15;21(16):1889–92.

  2. Cohen SP. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2005 Nov 1;101(5):1440-53.

  3. Liliang PC, Lu K, Liang CL, Tsai YD, Wang KW, Chen HJ. Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: findings using dual sacroiliac joint blocks. Pain Medicine. 2011 Apr 1;12(4):565 – 70.

  4. Polly DW, Cher D. Ignoring the sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain is costly. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. 2016 Jan;21:23–31.

  5. Cohen SP, Chen Y, Neufeld NJ. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment.Expert Rev;13:99–116.

  6. Spiker WR, Lawrence BD, Raich AL, Skelly AC, Brodke DS. Surgical versus injection treatment for injection-confirmed chronic sacroiliac joint pain. Evidence-based spine-care journal. 2012 Nov;3(04):41–53.

  7. Cohen SP, Hurley RW. The ability of diagnostic spinal injections to predict surgical outcomes. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2007 Dec 1;105(6):1756-75.

  8. Simopoulos TT, Manchikanti L, Gupta S, Aydin SM, Kim CH, Solanki DR, Nampiaparampil DE, Singh V, Staats PS, Hirsch JA. Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician., Barbieri M. M. Single strip lesions radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain: two years’ results. Anaesthesiology intensive therapy. 2016;48(1):19–22.

  9. Bellini M, Barbieri M. Single strip lesions radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain: two years? results. Anaesthesiology intensive therapy. 2016;48(1):19–22.

  10. Watanabe I, Masaki R, Min N, Oshikawa N, Okubo K, Sugimura H, Kojima T, Saito S, Ozawa Y, Kanmatsuse K. Cooled-tip ablation results in increased radiofrequency power delivery and lesion size in the canine heart: importance of catheter-tip temperature monitoring for prevention of popping and impedance rise. J interventional cardiac Electrophysiol. 2002 Feb;6:9–16.

  11. Yin W, Willard F, Carreiro J, Dreyfuss P. Sensory stimulation-guided sacroiliac joint radiofrequency neurotomy: technique based on neuroanatomy of the dorsal sacral plexus.Spine. 2003 Oct15;28(20):2419–25.

  12. Kapural L, Stojanovic M, Bensitel T, Zovkic P. Cooled radiofrequency (RF) of L5 dorsal ramus for RF denervation of the sacroiliac joint: technical report. Pain medicine. 2010 Jan 1;11(1):53 – 7.

  13. Tinnirello A, Barbieri S, Todeschini M, Marchesini M. Conventional (Simplicity III) and cooled (SInergy) radiofrequency for sacroiliac joint denervation: one-year retrospective study comparing two devices. Pain Medicine. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):1731-44.

  14. Cheng J, Pope JE, Dalton JE, Cheng O, Bensitel A. Comparative outcomes of cooled versus traditional radiofrequency ablation of the lateral branches for sacroiliac joint pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2013 Feb 1;29(2):132-7.

  15. Sun HH, Zhuang SY, Hong X, Xie XH, Zhu L, Wu XT. The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.Medicine.2018 Feb;97(6).

  16. Cohen SP, Strassels SA, Kurihara C, Crooks MT, Erdek MA, Forsythe A, Marcuson M. Outcome predictors for sacroiliac joint (lateral branch) radiofrequency denervation. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2009 Apr 1;34(3):206 – 14.

  17. Grob KR, Neuhuber WL, Kissling RO. [Innervation of the sacroiliac joint of the human]. Z Rheumatol. 1995;54:117–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts SL, Burnham RS, Ravichandiran K, Agur AM, Loh EY. Cadaveric study of sacroiliac joint innervation: implications for diagnostic blocks and radiofrequency ablation. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2014 Nov 1;39(6):456 – 64.

  19. Cox RC, Fortin JD. The anatomy of the lateral branches of the sacral dorsal rami: implications for radiofrequency ablation. Pain Physician. 2014;17(5):459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kapural L, Deering JP. A technological overview of cooled radiofrequency ablation and its effectiveness in the management of chronic knee pain. Pain Manage. 2020 May;10(3):133–40.

  21. Lorentzen T. A cooled needle electrode for radiofrequency tissue ablation: thermodynamic aspects of improved performance compared with conventional needle design. Academic radiology. 1996 Jul 1;3(7):556 – 63.

  22. Pino CA, Hoeft MA, Hofsess C, Rathmell JP. Morphologic analysis of bipolar radiofrequency lesions: implications for treatment of the sacroiliac joint. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2005 Jul 1;30(4):335-8.

  23. Desai MJ, Safriel Y. Mri for in vivo analysis of ablation zones formed by cooled radiofrequency neurotomy to treat chronic joint pain across multiple axial spine sites. J pain Res. 2022 Feb;9:423–30.

  24. Stelzer W, Aiglesberger M, Stelzer D, Stelzer V. Use of cooled radiofrequency lateral branch neurotomy for the treatment of sacroiliac joint-mediated low back pain: a large case series. Pain Medicine. 2013 Jan 1;14(1):29–35.

  25. Cohen SP, Hurley RW, Buckenmaier CC, Kurihara C, Morlando B, Dragovich A. Randomized placebo-controlled study evaluating lateral branch radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2008 Aug 1;109(2):279 – 88.

  26. Patel N, Gross A, Brown L, Gekht G. A randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of lateral branch neurotomy for chronic sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Medicine. 2012 Mar 1;13(3):383 – 98.

  27. Kurklinsky S, Boone MK, Candler SA, Schwab A, Ghazi S. Repeat cooled radiofrequency ablation is beneficial for chronic posterior sacroiliac joint pain. Pain medicine. 2020 Aug 1;21(8):1532-7.

  28. Stolzenberg D, Gordin V, Vorobeychik Y. Incidence of neuropathic pain after cooled radiofrequency ablation of sacral lateral branch nerves. Pain Medicine. 2014 Nov 1;15(11):1857-60.

  29. Zhao H, Wang H, Sun F, Lyu S, An Y. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017 Dec;21:1–2.

Download references




No funding received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JM: contributed to data collection, data analysis, writing and editing of the manuscriptPR: contributed to data collection, project conception and supervision, writing and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Maalouly.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our institutional review board (Ramsay Health Care Vic/NSW Human research ethics committee) approved a single-center experience which included 81 patients’ data with sacroiliac joint pain was collected June 2020 and December 2021. Data was collected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained.

Consent for publication

All patients were consented.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maalouly, J., Rao, P.J. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the sacroiliac joint a retrospective case series. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 261 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: