Skip to main content
Download PDF

Fatty infiltrate and neck muscle volume in individuals with chronic whiplash associated disorders compared to healthy controls – a cross sectional case–control study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 24, Article number: 181 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) are not fully understood. More knowledge of morphology is needed to better understand the disorder, improve diagnostics and treatments. The aim was to investigate dorsal neck muscle volume (MV) and muscle fat infiltration (MFI) in relation to self-reported neck disability among 30 participants with chronic WAD grade II-III compared to 30 matched healthy controls.

Methods

MV and MFI at spinal segments C4 through C7 in both sexes with mild- to moderate chronic WAD (n = 20), severe chronic WAD (n = 10), and age- and sex matched healthy controls (n = 30) was compared. Muscles: trapezius, splenius, semispinalis capitis and semispinalis cervicis were segmented by a blinded assessor and analyzed.

Results

Higher MFI was found in right trapezius (p = 0.007, Cohen’s d = 0.9) among participants with severe chronic WAD compared to healthy controls. No other significant difference was found for MFI (p = 0.22–0.95) or MV (p = 0.20–0.76).

Conclusions

There are quantifiable changes in muscle composition of right trapezius on the side of dominant pain and/or symptoms, among participants with severe chronic WAD. No other statistically significant differences were shown for MFI or MV. These findings add knowledge of the association between MFI, muscle size and self-reported neck disability in chronic WAD.

Trial registration

NA. This is a cross-sectional case–control embedded in a cohort study.

Peer Review reports

Background

Whiplash describes the mechanism of injury consisting of acceleration-deceleration mechanisms of energy transfer to the neck, which may lead to a variety of bony- or soft-tissue injuries and subsequent symptoms (Whiplash Associated Disorders, WAD) [1]. With roughly half transitioning into chronicity [2], WAD is associated with high individual and societal costs [3, 4], and limited activities of daily living for those transitioning from acute to chronic WAD [5].

Soft-tissues commonly exposed in whiplash include neck muscles [6,7,8]. They are at particular risk of muscle strain injury [9, 10]. Neck muscles are essential for proper neck functioning [11, 12] and are influenced by muscle size [13], specifically contractile muscular content [14]. Muscle fat infiltration (MFI) can occur in muscles [15] replacing contractile muscular content, lowering muscle function [16]. Well-functioning neck muscles are important in chronic WAD and is supported by neck specific exercise, primarily targeting the muscles, being one of the few effective treatments [17,18,19,20,21,22,23].

Both functional [24,25,26,27,28] and structural changes in (CSA) [29,30,31,32,33,34] and MFI [29, 33,34,35,36,37,38,39] are evident in WAD. Changes of CSA has been investigated in chronic WAD among dorsal neck muscles (interspinales [32], levator scapulae [29], multifidus [29,30,31,32], occipital muscles [29, 30, 32], semispinalis capitis [29,30,31], semispinalis cervicis [30,31,32], spinalis [29, 32], splenius capitis [29,30,31], splenius cervicis [29] and trapezius [29, 30]), as well as MFI in (levator scapulae [29], multifidus [33,34,35,36,37,38,39], occipital muscles [33, 35, 36], semispinalis capitis [33, 35, 36], semispinalis cervicis [33, 35, 36, 39], splenius capitis [33, 35, 36, 39] and trapezius [35, 36]).

Larger magnitudes of MFI are correlated with higher disability in chronic WAD [34, 38,39,40]. MFI and disability may, according to a pilot study, be reversed by neck specific exercise [41]. MFI can develop within two weeks following whiplash [38] and is a specific feature of WAD, not occurring in other chronic neck pain [29, 35, 42]. It is possible that MFI i) is associated with inadequate recovery of function, ii) could represent an initial damage involving both peripheral- and central structures of the neck [43], iii) could represent a risk factor for poor recovery [44]. The precise mechanisms underlying the development of MFI are unknown but seem to be a combination of tissue-based and stress-based interactions [45, 46].

Previous studies have investigated MFI and/or CSA in thin slices at different cervical segments and in different dorsal neck muscles [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39, 42, 43]. Measurements of CSA have shown conflicting results [29,30,31,32]. MFI is shown to distribute unequally among- and within different neck muscles [29, 33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40, 42, 43, 47] and sometimes measurements of muscles have been combined [39]. Only two of the studies investigating dorsal neck muscles used a blind assessor [29, 34] and a clear majority of the participants were female [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Most studies [29, 30, 32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39, 42, 43] specified WAD grade, and exclusively included participants with grade II (neck pain and musculoskeletal findings [1]) but excluded those with severe symptoms [29, 30, 32, 33, 35,36,37,38,39, 42, 43], i.e., neurological signs (WAD grade III [1]) and one study [31] did not specify WAD grade for its’ participants.

There is a need for improving knowledge of the association between MFI, changes in muscle size and disability [42], as well as verifying previous results via volumetric measures [33, 48]. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) are not fully understood, and more knowledge of morphology is needed to better understand the disorder, improve diagnostics and treatments. The aim was to investigate dorsal neck muscle volume (MV) and fat infiltration (MFI) in relation to self-reported neck disability among participants with chronic WAD grade II-III compared to matched healthy controls.

Methods

Study participants

Thirty participants (14 men, 16 women, mean age 41±11) with chronic WAD (>6 month, mean 18±9) and 30 healthy controls, matched for age and sex (14 men, 16 women, mean age 41±11) were recruited. Data was collected year 2012-2013 at a university hospital in the south of Sweden and later processed and analyzed.

Neck Disability Index (NDI): a measure of self-reported disability [49], reliable and valid for participants with neck pain disorders [50], was used to divide chronic WAD participants into a mild- to moderate chronic WAD group (NDI; ≤ 20% to < 40%) and a severe chronic WAD group (NDI; ≥ 40%) [34]. For demographic details, see Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic details of participants divided into three groups according to Neck Disability Index (NDI) [51]. Data are mean ± SD
Full size table

The chronic WAD group was consecutively recruited to the current exploratory cross sectional case-control study from an ongoing randomized clinical trial (RCT) [17, 52] with inclusion criteria: 18-63 years of age, presenting with chronic WAD grade II (clinical musculoskeletal findings emanating from the neck) or III (as grade II with additional neurological findings [1]) verified in a clinical examination following a whiplash injury six months to three years prior to inclusion, NDI >20% and/or VAS > 20 mm and being right-handed with dominant right sided symptoms. Exclusion criteria for the chronic WAD group were known or suspected serious physical pathology including myelopathy, spinal tumor, spinal infection, or ongoing malignancy, contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) such as metallic implants, claustrophobia and pregnancy, spinal fracture or subluxation, earlier neck trauma with persistent symptoms, cervical spine surgery, neck pain that caused a >1 month absence from work in the year prior to the WAD trauma, signs of traumatic brain injury at inclusion, generalized or dominant pain elsewhere in the body, diseases or other injuries that might prevent full study participation, diagnosis of a severe psychiatric disorder, known drug abuse and inability to answer the Swedish questionnaires [52].

Inclusion criteria for the healthy control group were right-handed, age- and sex matched to the participants with chronic WAD and exclusion criteria were contraindications for MRI, present or past neck pain, dysfunction, or related disability, rheumatological or neurological disease/conditions, generalized myalgia and history of neck trauma, neck pain or lower back pain. The healthy control group was recruited from a convenience sample of university and hospital staff as well as researchers’ acquaintances.

MRI protocol

Magnetic resonance images were acquired with a Philips Ingenia 3T scanner (Philips Health Care, Best, The Netherlands) using the built-in phased-array posterior coil, a 32-channel head coil, and an anterior flexible coil placed adjacent to the head coil. The participants were imaged in the supine, headfirst position. A 3D dual-echo gradient-echo sequence was used with out-of-phase and in-phase echo times of 3.66 ms and 7.24 ms, respectively. The echo times were chosen to enable the production of high-resolution images. The repetition time was 10 ms and the flip angle was 10° with a total acquisition time of 9 minutes. The images included cervical segmental levels C4 through C7 and were angled so that the in-plane images were parallel to the cervical segments and perpendicular to the long axis of the cervical musculature. The acquired image resolution was 0.75 × 0.75 × 0.75 mm3. Phase-sensitive reconstruction was used to acquire fat- and water- separated images [53, 54].

Image analysis

Trapezius, splenius, semispinalis capitis and semispinalis cervicis (figure 1) were semi-automatically segmented via Image Foresting Transform (IFT) [55] between spinal segmental levels C4 to C7. Semi-automatic segmentation was performed by an assessor (N.L.), blinded to group allocation, defining each individual muscle in the horizontal-, frontal- and sagittal plane creating a 3D mask used for analysis. The assessor used one set of markers for the muscle of interest and another set of markers for other tissues of no interest for the current study. IFT uses the different markers to continuously suggest regions of interest and disinterest of which the assessor can further define, resulting in a complete 3D model of the muscle without addition of surrounding tissue (Figure 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Viewed in axial plane (X–Y) at C5 level using the water-only image. a trapezius, b splenius, c semispinalis capitis and d semispinalis cervicis

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Segmentation of left trapezius. Views from left to right; sagittal plane (Y–Z), axial plane at C5 (X–Y) and coronal plane (X–Z)

Full size image

The interrater reliability for the image analysis performed by (N.L.) was determined by presenting 18 of the participants’ images twice in random order and calculated using Two-way random absolute agreement single rater - intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) [56] with an ICC of 0.91-0.99 for the MV of the muscles segmented. Image analysis was double checked with a second blinded rater (JM), a professor and musculoskeletal physical therapist with >15 years’ experience of MRI analysis.

MV was calculated by summating all pixels within the segmented mask multiplied with the image resolution. The fat infiltration was estimated via MATLAB 2017b using fat fraction, in which the amount of fat signal within the muscle divided by the sum of the water and fat signal within the muscle: fat fraction = fat/ (fat + water).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 28 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). Normal distributions were investigated using histograms and Shapiro-Wilk test for age, BMI, time since injury, NDI and for MV and MFI. Normal distribution could not be assumed for most variables, resulting in the use of non-parametric testing; Kruskal-Wallis H Test, and if statistically significant, followed by a post-hoc Mann-Whitney U-test. The significance level was set to p<0.05. Cohen’s d was computed to represent the magnitude of the effect size (ES) of statistically significant between group differences.

Results

A statistically significant difference in MFI was seen between groups for right trapezius (p=0.03, ES = 0.6), with higher MFI in severe WAD group compared to healthy controls (p=0.007, ES = 0.9). No statistically significant difference was seen between healthy controls and the mild- to moderate chronic WAD group (p=0.32) or between the two chronic WAD groups (p=0.10). No other statistically significant differences between groups were obtained for MFI (p=0.22-0.95) (Table 2) or MV (p=0.20-0.76) (Table 3). Severe chronic WAD show consistently higher MFI compared to healthy controls and mild- to moderate chronic WAD for all muscles except left trapezius (Figure 3). Left and right trapezius show increased MV in the chronic WAD groups compared to the healthy control group (Figure 4).

Table 2 Median values ± interquartile range for muscle fat infiltration (%)
Full size table
Table 3 Median values ± interquartile range for muscle volume (cm3)
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Muscle fat infiltration is expressed as percentages (%) with confidence interval set to 0.95. Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; WAD, Whiplash Associated Disorders; L, left; R, right; TRP, trapezius; SPL, splenius; SSCa, semispinalis capitis; SSCe, semispinalis cervicis

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Muscle volume are expressed as cm3 with confidence interval set to 0.95. Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; WAD, Whiplash Associated Disorders; L, left; R, right; TRP, trapezius; SPL, splenius; SSCa, semispinalis capitis; SSCe, semispinalis cervicis

Full size image

Discussion

The main finding is a statistically significantly higher MFI in the right trapezius, the side of dominant pain and/or symptoms, among participants with severe chronic WAD compared to healthy controls. This may be explained by Trapezius being exposed to large muscle strain [10] and injury [57] due to rapid activation of Trapezius in whiplash [6]. Higher MFI in Trapezius implies reduced functional muscle mass [14] and function [15] in a muscle important for neck movement [11].

Like the main finding, albeit only by a statistically non-significant trend, MFI is higher in splenius capitis, semispinalis capitis and semispinalis cervicis among participants with severe chronic WAD with highest MFI on the right side. This may be due to a too small sample size and may be a limitation of the study.

The main finding and statistically non-significant trends align with previous studies showing higher MFI in chronic WAD compared to healthy controls [29, 36]. The current study also aligns with previous work [39] showing no statistically significant difference in MFI for splenius capitis combined with sternocleidomastoid, and a statistically non-significant trend for higher MFI in participants with chronic WAD. However, the comparison is difficult considering the measurement methods used in this study (single muscles right and left) did not combine certain muscles (multifidus and semispinalis cervicis) [39].

The current study's statistically non-significant trend towards higher MFI in the superficial musculature i.e., trapezius and consistently less MFI in the deeper lying musculature contrasts earlier findings of higher MFI in deeper lying neck musculature as shown in anterior neck musculature [47] and dorsal deep- compared to superficial musculature [39].

The current study, showing no statistical differences between groups regarding MV, aligns with previous studies reporting unchanged CSA of splenius capitis [29,30,31], semispinalis capitis and semispinalis cervicis [31]; but is unsupportive of both lower CSA of trapezius and semispinalis capitis among WAD participants in another study [29]. There is a statistically non-significant trend for higher MV in the left and right trapezius among chronic WAD participants compared to healthy controls, seemingly independent of handedness and right sided dominant pain. The similarities regarding MV in the left and right trapezius, and in relation to the higher MFI being shown in the right trapezius, further highlights the importance of MFI measurements in conjunction with MV.

These findings improve knowledge of the association between MFI, muscle size and self-reported neck disability in chronic WAD. Implications can be made for exercising the most painful and/or symptomatic side, focusing on Trapezius as well as persons with high degree of disability; potentially reversing MFI [41] and reducing disability [17, 41]. However, this needs to be further evaluated in longitudinal intervention studies.

In the current study MFI is likely to have had the time to develop as it is seen within two weeks following a whiplash injury [38] and, with mean time post injury being 20 and 16 months for the two WAD groups respectively, comparable to another study showing higher MFI at a mean 20-month post injury [36]. Higher MFI in WAD participants have also been shown at 12 months post injury [39] and at 7 years post injury [29]. Given the severity of WAD, the presence of high MFI is not surprising, and this is supported by previous studies with WAD II [29, 36, 39]. Furthermore, this same cohort demonstrated higher MFI in the severe WAD group in multifidus [34]. Although higher MFI being shown in upper cervical segmental levels [47], the levels above C4 not included in the current study are unlikely affecting the result to a significant degree due to the low relative muscle volume compared to the volume analyzed (C4-C7).

The current study is unique of including participants with WAD-related neurological findings (WAD III) in relation to previous studies on the same muscles involving exclusively musculoskeletal findings (WAD II) [29, 30, 32, 33, 35,36,37,38,39, 42, 43]. It is unlikely that inclusion of WAD III attenuates MFI in the current cohort, rather it hypothetically should increase the chance of MFI findings, supported by MFI being shown in multifidus among the WAD participants [34] and greater MFI being associated with higher severity of WAD [29, 35,36,37, 43, 47].

Keeping demographic details known to affect MV and possibly MFI as equal as possible between groups using age- and sex-matched controls minimizes the number of uncontrolled factors influencing the results. Age [58], sex [59] and BMI [60] have all been shown to influence MV and are in the current study consistent between all groups. Including both men and women increases the standard deviation of MV due to the relative muscle size difference of men and women [59] and likely contribute to larger muscle sizes as compared to previous studies based predominantly on females [29,30,31,32,33,34]. The relatively high degree of men in the mild- to moderate WAD group might inflate the MV in comparison to both the severe WAD group and the control group; a potential contributor to the relatively high MV found in mild- to moderate group compared to the other groups.

The differences observed in this study compared to previous studies could be due to numerous factors. One of them being unequal distribution of MFI within- and among different neck muscles [29, 33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40, 42, 43, 47], causing a varying degree of MFI being measured via MV and CSA respectively, due to variance in specific spatial distribution. Other potential factors include the use of different MRI machines [61] and segmentation software [62]. A known factor in the current study is a risk of T1-bias for the MFI measurements, potentially inflating the absolute value of MFI but without affecting between group differences.

A limitation of the study is a lack of power and sample size calculation. With the number of research participants being similar to several other studies eliciting statistically significant differences between groups [29, 31, 34] it is possible that an even higher number, in line with some previous studies [36, 37] and a more equal distribution between groups, could have strengthened the current study’s results.

Conclusion

There are quantifiable changes in muscle composition of right trapezius on the side of dominant pain and/or symptoms, among participants with severe chronic WAD. No other statistically significant differences were shown for MFI or MV. These findings add knowledge of the association between MFI, muscle size and self-reported neck disability in chronic WAD.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and after ethical permissions.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CSA:

Cross-sectional area

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

IFT:

Image foresting transform

MFI:

Muscle fat infiltration

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MV:

Muscle volume

NDI:

Neck disability index

RCT:

Randomized clinical trial

SPL:

Splenius muscle

SSCa:

Semispinalis capitis muscle

SSCe:

Semispinalis cervicis muscle

TRP:

Trapezius muscle

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

WAD:

Chronic whiplash associated disorders

References

  1. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders: redefining “Whiplash” and its management. Spine  (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(8 Suppl):1S-73S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S, et al. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(4 Suppl):83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Guzman J, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders after traffic collisions. results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(2 Suppl):S61-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leth-Petersen S, Rotger GP. Long-term labour-market performance of whiplash claimants. J Health Econ. 2009;28:996–1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll LJ, Ferrari R, Cassidy JD, Côté P. Coping and recovery in whiplash-associated disorders: early use of passive coping strategies is associated with slower recovery of neck pain and pain-related disability. Clin J Pain. 2014;30:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olive OD, Marianne M, Henry PM, Hung-Kay CD. Muscle activity during low-speed rear impact. Chin J Traumatol. 2019;22:80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Ferrari R, Narayan Y. Effect of head rotation in whiplash-type rear impacts. Spine J. 2005;5:130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar S, Ferrari R, Narayan Y. Turning away from whiplash. an EMG study of head rotation in whiplash impact. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:224–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brault JR, Siegmund GP, Wheeler JB. Cervical muscle response during whiplash: evidence of a lengthening muscle contraction. Clin Biomech. 2000;15:426–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasavada AN, Brault JR, Siegmund GP. Musculotendon and fascicle strains in anterior and posterior neck muscles during whiplash injury. Spine  (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:756–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Conley MS, Meyer RA, Bloomberg JJ, Feeback DL, Dudley GA. Noninvasive analysis of human neck muscle function. Spine  (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:2505–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Liu T, Liu Y. Cervical proprioception impairment in neck pain-pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management: a narrative review. Pain Ther. 2021;10:143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fitts RH, Widrick JJ. Muscle mechanics. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1996;24:427–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sweeney HL, Hammers DW. Muscle contraction. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10(2):023200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamrick MW, McGee-Lawrence ME, Frechette DM. Fatty infiltration of skeletal muscle: mechanisms and comparisons with bone marrow adiposity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2016;7:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang Z, Marriott K, Maly MR. Impact of inter- and intramuscular fat on muscle architecture and capacity. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2019;47:515–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ludvigsson ML, Peterson G, O’Leary S, Dedering Å, Peolsson A. The effect of neck-specific exercise with, or without a behavioral approach, on pain, disability, and self-efficacy in chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a randomized clinical trial. Clin J Pain. 2015;31:294–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ludvigsson ML, Peterson G, Dedering Å, Peolsson A. One- and two-year follow-up of a randomized trial of neck-specific exercise with or without a behavioural approach compared with prescription of physical activity in chronic whiplash disorder. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landén Ludvigsson M, Peterson G, Peolsson A. Neck-specific exercise may reduce radiating pain and signs of neurological deficits in chronic whiplash - analyses of a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludvigsson ML, Peterson G, Peolsson A. Neck-specific exercise for radiating pain and neurological deficits in chronic whiplash, a 1-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):6758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Treleaven J, Peterson G, Ludvigsson ML, Kammerlind AS, Peolsson A. Balance, dizziness and proprioception in patients with chronic whiplash associated disorders complaining of dizziness: a prospective randomized study comparing three exercise programs. Man Ther. 2016;22:122–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Landén Ludvigsson M, Peterson G, Widh S, Peolsson A. Exercise, headache, and factors associated with headache in chronic whiplash: analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Medicine. 2019;98(48):18130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Overmeer T, Peterson G, Ludvigsson ML, Peolsson A. The effect of neck-specific exercise with or without a behavioral approach on psychological factors in chronic whiplash-associated disorders a randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. Medicine (United States). 2016;95: e4430.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson G, Nilsson D, Peterson S, Dedering A, Trygg J, Wallman T, et al. Changes in dorsal neck muscle function in individuals with chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a real-time ultrasound case-control study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:1090–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peterson G, Dedering SA, Andersson E, Nilsson D, Trygg J, Peolsson M, et al. Altered ventral neck muscle deformation for individuals with whiplash associated disorder compared to healthy controls - a case-control ultrasound study. Man Ther. 2015;20:319–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Peolsson A, Peterson G, Trygg J, Nilsson D. Multivariate analysis of ultrasound-recorded dorsal strain sequences: Investigation of dynamic neck extensions in women with chronic whiplash associated disorders. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):30415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Daenen L, Nijs J, Raadsen B, Roussel N, Cras P, Dankaerts W. Cervical motor dysfunction and its predictive value for long-term recovery in patients with acute whiplashassociated disorders: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:113–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hesby BB, Hartvigsen J, Rasmussen H, Kjaer P. Electronic measures of movement impairment, repositioning, and posture in people with and without neck pain-a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. van Looveren E, Cagnie B, Coppieters I, Meeus M, de Pauw R. Changes in muscle morphology in female chronic neck pain patients using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine  (Phila Pa 1976). 2021;46:638–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Elliott J, Jull G, Noteboom JT, Galloway G. MRI study of the cross-sectional area for the cervical extensor musculature in patients with persistent whiplash associated disorders (WAD). Man Ther. 2008;13:258–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Okada E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, et al. Cross-sectional area of the posterior extensor muscles of the cervical spine in whiplash injury patients versus healthy volunteers - 10 year follow-up MR study. Injury. 2012;43:912–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ulbrich EJ, Aeberhard R, Wetli S, Busato A, Boesch C, Zimmermann H, et al. Cervical muscle area measurements in whiplash patients: acute, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:1413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Elliott JM, Pedler AR, Jull GA, Van Wyk L, Galloway GG, O’leary SP. Differential changes in muscle composition exist in traumatic and nontraumatic neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karlsson A, Leinhard OD, Åslund U, West J, Romu T, Smedby Ö, et al. An investigation of fat infiltration of the multifidus muscle in patients with severe neck symptoms associated with chronic whiplash-associated disorder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46:886–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Elliott J, Sterling M, Noteboom JT, Darnell R, Galloway G, Jull G. Fatty infiltrate in the cervical extensor muscles is not a feature of chronic, insidious-onset neck pain. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:681–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Elliott J, Jull G, Noteboom JT, Darnell R, Galloway G, Gibbon WW. Fatty infiltration in the cervical extensor muscles in persistent whiplash-associated disorders: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:847–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pedler A, McMahon K, Galloway G, Durbridge G, Sterling M. Intramuscular fat is present in cervical multifidus but not soleus in patients with chronic whiplash associated disorders. PLoS ONE. 2018;13: e0197438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Elliott JM, Courtney M, Rademaker A, Pinto D, Sterling MM, Parrish TB. The rapid and progressive degeneration of the cervical multifidus in whiplash: an MRI study of fatty infiltration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:E694-700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Elliott JM, Smith AC, Hoggarth MA, Albin SR, Weber KA, Haager M, et al. Muscle fat infiltration following whiplash: a computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging comparison. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):0234061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Peolsson A, Karlsson A, Peterson G, Borén H, Zsigmond P, Elliott JM, et al. Morphology and composition of the ventral neck muscles in individuals with chronic whiplash related disorders compared to matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional case–control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. O’leary S, Jull G, Van Wyk L, Pedler A, Elliott J. Morphological changes in the cervical muscles of women with chronic whiplash can be modified with exercise-a pilot study. Muscle Nerve. 2015;52:772–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. de Pauw R, Coppieters I, Kregel J, de Meulemeester K, Danneels L, Cagnie B. Does muscle morphology change in chronic neck pain patients? - a systematic review. Man Ther. 2016;22:42–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Elliott JM. Are there implications for morphological changes in neck muscles after whiplash injury? Spine  (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:S205-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Valencia AP, Lai JK, Iyer SR, Mistretta KL, Spangenburg EE, Davis DL, et al. Fatty infiltration is a prognostic marker of muscle function after rotator cuff tear. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:2161–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Walton DM, Elliott JM. An integrated model of chronic whiplash-associated disorder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47:462–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Elliott JM, Rueckeis CA, Pan Y, Parrish TB, Walton DM, Linnstaedt SD. microRNA let-7i-5p mediates the relationship between muscle fat infiltration and neck pain disability following motor vehicle collision: a preliminary study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Elliott JM, O’Leary S, Sterling M, Hendrikz J, Pedler A, Jull G. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of fatty infiltrate in the cervical flexors in chronic whiplash. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:948–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Owers DS, Perriman DM, Smith PN, Neeman T, Webb AL. Evidence for cervical muscle morphometric changes on magnetic resonance images after whiplash: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2018;49:165–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Macdelilld JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, Mcalpine C, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:400–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Peolsson A, Landén Ludvigsson M, Overmeer T, Dedering Å, Bernfort L, Johansson G, et al. Effects of neck-specific exercise with or without a behavioural approach in addition to prescribed physical activity for individuals with chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a prospective randomised study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Rydell J, Knutsson H, Pettersson J, Johansson A, Farnebäck G, Dahlqvist O, et al. Phase sensitive reconstruction for water/fat separation in MR imaging using inverse gradient. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2007;4791 LNCS PART 1:210–8.

  54. Romu T, Dahlström N, Leinhard OD, Borga M. Robust water fat separated dual-echo MRI by phase-sensitive reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78:1208–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Malmberg F, Vidholm E, Nyström I. A 3D live-wire segmentation method for volume images using haptic interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2006;4245 LNCS:663–73.

  56. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Brooks SV, Faulkner JA. Severity of contraction-induced injury is affected by velocity only during stretches of large strain. J Appl Physiol. 1985;2001(91):661–6.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wilkinson DJ, Piasecki M, Atherton PJ. The age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function: measurement and physiology of muscle fibre atrophy and muscle fibre loss in humans. Ageing Res Rev. 2018;47:123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Bredella MA. Sex differences in body composition. In: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017. p. 9–27.

  60. Khanna D, Peltzer C, Kahar P, Parmar MS. Body Mass Index (BMI): a screening tool analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(2):22119.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Belli G, Busoni S, Ciccarone A, Coniglio A, Esposito M, Giannelli M, et al. Quality assurance multicenter comparison of different MR scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43:213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wong AKO, Manske SL. A comparison of peripheral imaging technologies for bone and muscle quantification: a review of segmentation techniques. J Clin Densitom. 2020;23:92–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the study participants and all contributors, at any stage, to the study.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Linköping University. The current study was funded through the Swedish Medical Research Council and the Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Nils Lund, Gunnel Peterson & Anneli Peolsson

  2. Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Nils Lund, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard, Magnus Borga, Anette Karlsson & Anneli Peolsson

  3. AMRA Medical AB, Linköping, Sweden

    Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard & Magnus Borga

  4. Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard

  5. Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Northern Sydney Local Health District, The Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia

    James M Elliott

  6. Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

    James M Elliott

  7. Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Gunnel Peterson

  8. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Magnus Borga

  9. Department of Neurosurgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Peter Zsigmond

  10. Occupational and Environmental Medicine Center, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Clinical Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Anneli Peolsson

Authors
  1. Nils Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James M Elliott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gunnel Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Magnus Borga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter Zsigmond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Anette Karlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anneli Peolsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Scientific idea: AP. Study Design: AP, AK, ODL. Recruitment of patients: GP, AP. Recruitment of healthy volunteers: AP, AK. Image analysis methodology: MB, ODL. Data collection: GP (clinical data), AK (MRI data). Overall clinical responsibility: PZ, AP. Analysis: NL with support from AK and AP. Images: NL, double checked by JM. First draft: NL. All authors revised and approved the final version. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Lund.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Linköping University’s Central Ethical Review Board (DNR 2011/262-32). Oral and written informed consent was obtained from every research participant, all personal data was key-coded, data and code key securely stored in different file vaults and handled in accordance with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Participants was insured via the Swedish Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency and the research was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. OD Land MB is employees and shareholders of AMRA Medical AB, Linköping, Sweden. AK is a shareholder of AMRA Medical AB. JM has a 3% ownership in Orofacial Therapeutics LC and receives compensation (< USD$10,000/annum for professional development courses with Medbridge).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lund, N., Dahlqvist Leinhard, O., Elliott, J.M. et al. Fatty infiltrate and neck muscle volume in individuals with chronic whiplash associated disorders compared to healthy controls – a cross sectional case–control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06289-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06289-x

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us