Skip to main content
Download PDF

Short-term effects of Kinesio taping combined with cervical muscles multi-angle isometric training in patients with cervical spondylosis

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 24, Article number: 38 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of Kinesio taping (KT) combined with multi-angle isometric resistance training for cervical spondylosis.

Methods

Sixty-one patients were divided into two groups by random number table method. Both groups were given multi-angle isometric training, the patients in the observation group were supplemented with Kinesio taping. Before and after treatment, the symptoms of cervical spine function were evaluated in two groups by visual analogue scale (VAS), cervical dysfunction index (NDI), cervical range of motion and muscle stiffness.

Results

After 3 weeks of treatment, VAS, NDI scores and the cervical range of motion were significantly better than before (P < 0.05). The range of anterior flexion and extension was significantly larger than the control group (P < 0.05), but the range of other motions were not certain. The muscle stiffness in KT group were significantly lower than the control group.

Conclusion

Kinesio taping combined with multi-angle isometric resistance training can further alleviate the clinical symptoms and correct the neck abnormal posture. But its effects on the range of cervical motion remain uncertain.

Peer Review reports

Background

Neck type cervical spondylopathy (NTCS), a type of cervical spondylosis, is characterized by pain in the neck and shoulder, limited range of movement, and abnormal physiological curvature. In recent years, due to the growing prevalence of poor posture caused by the overuse of Internet, the incidence of NTCS is increasing, especially in students. Therefore, it had a significant impact on daily life (including work and study) of patients with NTCS.

The most common treatment for the pain syndrome in the course of NTCS is physiotherapy, which include manual therapy and Kinesio taping(KT) [1]. Previous studies have confirmed the efficacy of manual therapy and Kinesio taping (KT) in alleviating symptoms of NTCS by altering parafunctional behaviors [2, 3]. Further studies found that the key to perform efficient manual therapy or KT was to localize and release those trigger points.

Trigger points can be localized by palpation examination with the manifestation of nodules at a size of granule. It was formed by muscle fibers with increased tension, which could interfere with muscle movement patterns and weaken muscle strength. The discomfort could be alleviated by releasing trigger points [4, 5].

(KT) has been widely used for treating various injuries [6,7,8,9] and attracted much attention in recent years. It can normalize muscle function, increase microcirculation, relieve pain, and support the work of joint [10,11,12,13] by applying specific tape on patients’ skin. Researchers have proposed it may reduce lymphatic and venous edema, but its effect in muscle disease and vascular condition was poorly reported. The exact mechanism of KT remains unclear. However, it was reported that KT may have short-term effects on muscle activation and support proprioceptive information [14, 15]. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of Kinesio taping (KT) combined with multi-angle isometric resistance training on the pain and movement function in patients with NTCS.

Methods and participants

Participants

Seventy patients with NTCS in the Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation in our hospital were recruited between March 2016 and December 2019. The assessors and statisticians were unaware of the group allocation throughout the study period. All the researchers received training to ensure strict adherence to the study protocol.

The inclusion criteria were adults aged between 18 to 65 years with changes in cervical curvature showed by X-ray film inspection (such as straightening or anti-bow), and symptoms on the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological scale. Exclusion criteria were as follows:1) serious heart disease; 2) abnormal functions of the liver, brain, kidney, and other vital organ; 3) blood system diseases and serious mental illness; 5) cervical vertebrae fracture, dislocation, tuberculosis, serious infection; 6) contraindications for KT technique, including thrombosis, wounds, presence of cancer, intolerability of or allergy to surgical tape; 7) pregnancy. Out of 70 participants, 62 patients were recruited in this study (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Participant recruitment schedule. Out of 70 participants recruited from the accessible population, 62 patients met the study selection criteria

Full size image

This study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn) and the registration number was ChiCTR1900024907with the first registration on 03/08/2019(ChiCTR1900024907) . This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (China)( [2016]3). All participants provided informed consent before participation.

Study design

We performed a controlled clinical trial between March 2016 and December 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to KT group (n = 31) and control group (n = 30) by a random number table. Both groups were treated with physical modality therapy and multi-angle isometric resistance training for cervical muscles. The patients in the KT group were supplemented with Kinesio taping. All treatment interventions were carried out by a KT instructor with extensive experience, and he was blinded to the grouping information and measurements for outcomes, and the physical therapists were asked not to reveal the outcome message to the team members.

Kinesio taping application

The tape (Kinesio Tex; Kinesio Nan Jing) used in this study was waterproof, porous, and adhesive. The tape with a width of 5 cm and a thickness of 0.5 mm was applied in the KT group. Patients received the following Kinesio Taping when seated. The first layer of the tape consisted of an X-strip placed over the trigger spot, over the mid-cervical region (C3-C6), with the patient’s cervical spine in flexion to apply tension to the posterior structures (Fig. 2A). The overlying strip was a blue Y-strip placed perpendicular to the X-strip placed over the posterior cervical extension muscles, from the insertion to the origin, with paper-off tension, which the manufacturer applies to the tape against its paper backing at approximately 15% to 25% stretch. Each tail of the second strip (blue Y-strip, 2-tailed) was applied with the patient’s neck in a position of cervical contralateral side bending and rotation (Fig. 2B). The tape was placed from the dorsal region (T2-T5) to the upper-cervical region (C1-C2). The other strip was a Y-typed placed from acromion to the upper cervical region (C1-C2) (Fig. 2C). Patients wore the Kinesio Tape 2 times a week during a 3-week period, and it was removed just before outcome assessment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Application method of Kinesio Taping. A. The first layer of tape consisted of a X-strip placed over the pain spot, over the mid-cervical region (C3-C6), with the patient’s cervical spine in flexion to apply tension to the posterior structures. B. The overlying strip was a blue Y-strip placed perpendicular to the X-strip placed over the posterior cervical extension muscles, from the insertion to the origin, with paper-off tension, which the manufacturer applies to the tape against its paper backing at approximately 15% to 25% stretch. Each tail of the second strip (blue Y-strip, 2-tailed) was applied with the patient’s neck in a position of cervical contralateral side bending and rotation. C. The tape was placed from the dorsal region (T2-T5) to the upper-cervical region (C1-C2). The other strip was a Y-typed placed from acromion to the upper cervical region (C1-C2)

Full size image

Manipulation interventions

The two groups received multi-angle isometric training for cervical muscles. The patients were trained by a physiotherapist. The specific trainings were as follows: 1) Cervical flexion training, the patient put his hands on the forehead to prevent head flexion action, and try to maintain balance so that the head does not move. 2) Cervical extension training. The patient's hands were overlapped and placed at the back of the head to prevent the head extended, while maintain the balance so that the head does not move. 3)Cervical rotation training. The patient's hands were placed on the one side of the head, with one hand exerting resistance to prevent the head to see the shoulder on the other side and maintained the balance. 4) Cervical lateral flexion training. The patient's hands were placed on the one side of the head, with one hand exerting resistance and mintained balance. 5) Cervical neutral position training. The palm of the hand applied external force from different directions (the forehead, the back pillow, and the bilateral cheeks), while the head and neck performed corresponding confrontation exercise to maintain the head in a neutral position. The above exercises were performed 30 min once time, 3 times per day, and 10 days for one course dur period.

Evaluation methods

Four parameters were measured before the treatment and 3 weeks later. 1) Degree of pain was assessed by means of a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). 2) Cervical vertebra function was evaluated by the neck disability index (NDI) [16], which measures symptoms and disability related to the neck. NDI could evaluate the following 10 items: the level of pain, daily life, extraction, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving and sleep. Each item was evaluated by 6 questions scoring 0–5 or 6. The total score of NDI was 50. And the score positively correlated with the neck dysfunction of the neck. 3) The range of motion for cervical vertebra was assessed (including flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral flexion). 4) The trapezius muscle state was evaluated with stiffness by Myoton hand-held dynamometer.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data are expressed as the mean ± SD. The VAS, NDI, CROM and muscle stiffness were assessed for the two groups at baseline and after treatment. Within—and between – group comparisons were performed using Student’s paired t-tests. The data were analyzed with SPSS Version 20.0 (SPSS Inc, USA), and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Sixty-one participants (mean ± SD age, 42.5 ± 3.2 years; 36.07% female) satisfied the eligibility criteria, and were randomized to the KT group (n = 31) or control group (n = 30). There was no significant difference between KT group and control group in VAS (F = 1.902, P = 0.216), NDI scores (F = 0.244, P = 0.15) and CROM before treatment (p > 0.05, Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline demographics for both groups before treatment
Full size table

Both interventions were performed 2 times a week during the 3-week period by the random number table method. The data of the two groups (Table 2) were compared, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Table 2 Comparison of VAS, DNI and Cervical range of motionbetween two groups
Full size table

The interaction of group and time for the 2-by-2 mixed-model analysis of variance was statistically significant for NDI, flexion and extension. The patients who received the Kinesio Taping experienced a greater increase in cervical flexion and extension range of motion than the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant interaction for VAS, CROM for right and left rotation, and right and left lateral flexion between groups (Table 2).

There was no significant difference between the two groups before treatment on muscle stiffness (p > 0.05). After the 3 weeks treatment period, the muscle stiffness in KT group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05) ( Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of muscle stiffness between two groups
Full size table

Discussion

The results of this study suggested that the application of Kinesio Taping and multi-angle isometric resistance training had similar effects for pain reduction. Additionally, patients in both groups gained similar improvements in cervical extension, flexion, and lateral flexion in both directions. However, individuals who received the combination treatment of Kinesio Taping and multi-angle isometric resistance training exhibited a greater increase in cervical flexion and extension range of motion than those in the control group. The pain relief in neck for both groups were not statistically significant.

In routine practice, relieving muscle pain and regulating muscle tension was the key to treat patients with cervical spondylosis. Therefore, a variety of techniques were applied to perform the goals, such as biofeedback, manual therapy, Kinesio therapy, botulinum toxin, platelet rich plasma, and pulsed radiofrequency.

Biofeedback was performed by placing surface electrodes on the skin to measure the frequency, intensity and duration of muscle contractions in order to decrease the tension of cramped muscles or increase the activity of weak muscles [17]. Meanwhile, botulinum toxin mainly inhibited the release of inflammatory transmitters from sensory nerve endings, while it could achieve flaccidity by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from nerve endings [18]. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) was obtained by centrifugation of autologous blood. Clinical injections of PRP in excess of physiological concentrations to the lesion could release a variety of bioactive proteins that inhibited the inflammatory response, and promoted tissue regeneration and healing [19]. As an emerging interventional therapy, pulsed radiofrequency had the advantages of accurate localization, reproducibility, high safety and no nerve damage. Currently, pulsed radiofrequency was widely used for joint pain [20].

Previous studies had reported that cervical spine thrust manipulation is effective for reducing pain in individuals with mechanical neck pain [21, 22]. Meanwhile, Kinesio Taping could improve pain-free shoulder range of motion but had no effect on spontaneous pain or function [23]. This study also demonstrated that the combination of Kinesio Taping and multi-angle isometric resistance training can reduce self-reported disability, which was measured by the NDI over the 3-week duration in the study. However, changes observed were lower than the reported MCID of 7 points for the NDI [24]. It is possible that consecutive applications of Kinesio Taping or cervical manipulation would result in greater changes.

Historically, the mechanisms of spinal thrust manipulation have been primarily assumed to be biomechanical, but recently it has been purported that the mechanisms may be neurophysiological [25]. It is also possible that spinal thrust manipulation may result in a decrease in thermal pain sensitivity.

Previous study have confirmed that isometric contraction training is significantly better than isotonic in patients with NTCS [26]. Lindsay reported the training of isometric tetanic contractions could improve contractile function of dystrophin-deficient muscle, indicating a potential role for enhancing muscle strength in patients with DMD and BMD [27]. Moreover, patients with poor performance after isotonic contraction treatment can still achieve better performance after giving equal length contraction training. This study also showed that patients received either intervention could exhibit subtle increase in CROM. This was in agreement with findings from previous studies, which showed an improvement in movement and pain relief after applying the Kinesio Taping [28,29,30,31,32]. In a previous study, it displayed that mobilization technique with KT improved the ROM of the trapeziometacarpal joint [33]. Another study also reported improvement in stiffness after using Kinesio taping in patients with first metacarpal joint osteoarthritis [34]. Similar to aforementioned findings, some studies have suggested KT, as an adjunctive intervention, cpuld improve the ROM in rheumatoid hand. The changes were significantly greater in cervical flexion and extension range of motion than those in the control group, but the differences of other CROM were subtle. It is possible that greater changes in CROM could be observed from multiple applications of each intervention over a longer period.

However, there were some limitations in this study that should be noted. First, for some of the comparisons, the sample size was insufficient to demonstrate statistical significance for the clinical improvement observed, and further studies should therefore aim to calculate the sample size with sufficient power with a higher homogeneity in recruited participants from multiple centers. Second, we did not perform long-term follow-up evaluations to assess those changes. Further studies could implement longer follow-up periods to investigate the exact influence of KT on patients with NTCS.

Conclusion

Patients with cervical spondylosis receiving an application of Kinesio Taping exhibited statistically significant improvements in pain levels and range of cervical motion immediately following application of the Kinesio Taping and after 3-weeks follow-up period. However, the improvements were subtle and may not be clinically meaningful. Further studies should investigate whether Kinesio Taping provides optimized outcomes when added to physical therapy interventions with proven efficacy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Added MA, Costa LO, Fukuda TY, de Freitas DG, Salomao EC, Monteiro RL, et al. Efficacy of adding the Kinesio Taping method to guideline-endorsed conventional physiotherapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Copurgensli C, Gur G, Tunay VB. A comparison of the effects of Mulligan's mobilization and Kinesio taping on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, and neck disability in patients with cervical spondylosis: A randomized controlled study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016.

  3. Kuligowski T, Skrzek A, Cieslik B. Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):6176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lietz-Kijak D, Kopacz L, Ardan R, Grzegocka M, Kijak E. Assessment of the Short-Term Effectiveness of Kinesiotaping and Trigger Points Release Used in Functional Disorders of the Masticatory Muscles. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018:5464985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wieckiewicz W, Wozniak K, Piatkowska D, Szyszka-Sommerfeld L, Lipski M. The diagnostic value of pressure algometry for temporomandibular disorders. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:575038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mostafavifar M, Wertz J, Borchers J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of kinesio taping for musculoskeletal injury. Phys Sportsmed. 2012;40(4):33–40. https://doi.org/10.3810/psm.2012.11.1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ortiz-Ramirez J, Perez-De la Cruz S. Efficacy of the application of kinesio tape in patients with stroke. Rev Neurol. 2017;64(4):175–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheng Y, Duan Z, Qu Q, Chen W, Yu B. Kinesio taping in treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(10):734–40. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelle B, Güzel R, Sakallı H. The effect of Kinesio taping application for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(10):997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515603218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Öztürk, Gülcan, Duygu Geler Külcü, Nilgün Mesci, et al. Efficacy of kinesio tape application on pain and muscle strength in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: a placebo-controlled trial. Journal of physical therapy science, 2016, 28 (4): 1074–1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1074

  11. Puerma-Castillo MC, García-Ríos MC, Pérez-Gómez ME, et al. Effectiveness of kinesio taping in addition to conventional rehabilitation treatment on pain, cervical range of motion and quality of life in patients with neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):453–64. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fábio CL, Benoît PF, Laurent JB, et al. Effectiveness of kinesio taping in addition to conventional rehabilitation treatment on pain, cervical range of motion and quality of life in patients with neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e017951. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. García -Muro F, Rodríguez-Fernández AL, Herrero-de-Lucas A. Treatment of myofascial pain in the shoulder with Kinesio taping. Acase report. Man Ther. 2010;15(3):292–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2009.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaya E, Zinnuroglu M, Tugcu I. Kinesio taping compared to physicaltherapy modalities for the treatment of shoulder impingementsyndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(2):201–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1475-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paoloni M, Bernetti A, Fratocchi G, et al. Kinesio taping applied to lumbar muscles influences clinical and electromyographic characteristics in chronic low back pain patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47(2):237–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2011.570853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Björklund M, Wiitavaara B, Heiden M. Responsiveness and minimal important change for the ProFitMap-neck questionnaire and the Neck Disability Index in women with neck-shoulder pain. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(1):161–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1373-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Florjanski W, Malysa A, Orzeszek S, Smardz J, Olchowy A, Paradowska-Stolarz A, et al. Evaluation of Biofeedback Usefulness in Masticatory Muscle Activity Management-A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramos-Herrada RM, Arriola-Guillen LE, Atoche-Socola KJ, Bellini-Pereira SA, Castillo AA. Effects of botulinum toxin in patients with myofascial pain related to temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review. Dent Med Probl. 2022;59(2):271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harba AN, Harfoush M. Evaluation of the participation of hyaluronic acid with platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders. Dent Med Probl. 2021;58(1):81–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pietruszka P, Chruscicka I, Dus-Ilnicka I, Paradowska-Stolarz A. PRP and PRF-Subgroups and Divisions When Used in Dentistry. J Pers Med. 2021;11(10):944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saavedrahernández M, Castrosánchez AM, Arroyomorales M, et al. Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping Versus Cervical Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(8):724–30. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.4086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Puentedura EJ, Landers MR, Cleland JA, Mintken PE, Huijbregts P, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Thoracic spine thrust manipulation versuscervical spine thrust manipulation in patientswith acute neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(4):208–20. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akpinar FM, Sindel D. Kinesio taping application for rotator cuff disease: Beneficial or harmful? - A Cochrane Review summary with commentary. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;68(2):286–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index:a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):400–17. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Butler RJ, Slaven E. The neurophysiological effects of a single session of spinal joint mobilization: does the effect last? J Man Manip Ther. 2011;19(3):143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ylinen J, Salo P, Nykanen M, et al. Decreased isometric neck strength in women with chronic neck pain and therapy ability of neck strength measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(8):1303–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindsay A, Larson AA, Verma M, et al. Isometric resistance training increases strength and alters histopathology of dystrophin-deficient mouse skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2019;126(2):363–75. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00948.2018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. García-Muro F, Rodríguez-Fernández AL, Herre-ro-de-Lucas A. Treatment of myofascial pain inthe shoulder with Kinesio Taping. A case report. Man Ther. 2010;15:292–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2009.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Venta Donec, Raimondas Kubilius. The effectiveness of Kinesio Taping for mobility and functioning improvement in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.Clin Rehabil, 2020, 34(7): 877–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520916859

  30. Ay S, Konak HE, Evcik D, Kibar S. The effectiveness of Kinesio Taping on pain and disability in cervical myofascial pain syndrome. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed. 2017;57(2):93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saruhan Hülya Kurt, Toprak Murat. This study aims to evaluate pain-diminishing and quality of life-related outcomes of Kinesio taping in patients on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy for post-thoracotomy pain syndrome. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;66(2):147–53. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.4068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Farhadian M, Morovati Z, Shamsoddini A. Effect of Kinesio Taping on Pain, Range of Motion, Hand Strength, and Functional Abilities in Patients with Hand Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019;7(6):551–60.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Villafane JH, Langford D, Alguacil-Diego IM, Fernandez-Carnero J. Management of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis pain and dysfunction using mobilization with movement technique in combination with kinesiology tape: a case report. J Chiropr Med. 2013;12(2):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2013.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gülcan Öztürk, Duygu Geler Külcü, Nilgün Mesci, et al. Efficacy of kinesio tape application on pain and muscle strength in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: a placebo-controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(4):1074–1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1074

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the assistance of the administrative staff members of Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, and Ezhou Central Hospital.

Funding

This study was funded by the Clinical Medical Scientific Research Projects of Wu Han (NO: WX14B06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China

    Jian Xiong & Weijing Liao

  2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, 430030, China

    Jian Xiong, Zhichao Zhang, Yan Ma, Zuhong Li, Yongjin Chen & Qi Liu

  3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ezhou Central Hospital, Ezhou, 436000, China

    Zhe Zhang

Authors
  1. Jian Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhe Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhichao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zuhong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yongjin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Weijing Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xion Jian and Liao Weijing conceived the study, led the proposal and protocol development. Zhang Zhe, Zhang Zhichao and Ma Yan contributed to study design, Chen Yongjin and Li Zuhong collected the data, Zhang Zhichao and Liu Qi analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jian Xiong or Weijing Liao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(http://www.chictr.org.cn)and the registration number was ChiCTR1900024907. This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (China)( [2016]3). All study participants provided informed consent, and the study design was approved by the appropriate ethics review board. Also, this study was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z. et al. Short-term effects of Kinesio taping combined with cervical muscles multi-angle isometric training in patients with cervical spondylosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24, 38 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06154-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06154-x

Keywords

  • Cervical spondylosis
  • Isometric
  • Kinesio taping
  • Multi-angle
  • Resistance training
  • Stiffness

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us