Skip to main content
Download PDF

The lateral femoral notch sign and coronal lateral collateral ligament sign in magnetic resonance imaging failed to predict dynamic anterior tibial laxity

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 23, Article number: 402 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between the lateral femoral notch sign as well as the coronal lateral collateral ligament (LCL) sign and anterior tibial translation using the GNRB arthrometer in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

Methods

Forty-six patients with ACL injuries were retrospectively included from May 2020 to February 2022; four patients were excluded due to incomplete data. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were reviewed for the lateral femoral notch sign and the coronal LCL sign. The GNRB arthrometer was used to evaluate the dynamic anterior tibial translation of the knee, and the side-to-side differences (SSDs) in tibial translation between the injured knee and healthy knee were calculated at different force levels. Two types of slopes for displacement-force curves were acquired.

Results

Six patients (14.3%) had the positive lateral femoral notch sign (notch depth > 2.0 mm), and 14 patients (33.3%) had the positive coronal LCL sign. The SSD of the anterior tibial translations under different loads as well as the slopes of displacement-force curves were the same in the positive and negative notch sign groups (p all > 0.05) and between the positive and negative coronal LCL sign groups (p all > 0.05). Meanwhile, the measured notch depth and notch length were also not significantly correlated with the anterior tibial translation SSD in the GNRB.

Conclusion

The presence of the lateral femoral notch sign and the coronal LCL sign did not indicate greater dynamic tibial laxity as measured using the GNRB.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is high in certain sports, such as soccer, handball, and basketball [1]. Although some signs in conventional radiographs are helpful, magnetic resonance image (MRI) remains the best imaging modality for diagnosing an ACL tear [2]. In addition to changes in the integrity of the ACL itself, some additional findings in MRIs are not uncommon in patients with ACL tears, such as the lateral femoral notch sign [3], patellar and tibial edema [4], bone contusions on the femoral condyles and tibial plateau [5], and the coronal LCL sign [6].

The lateral femoral notch sign, defined as an impaction > 2 mm of the lateral femoral condyle, following an ACL injury is of special interest [2, 3]. Recently, it was found that the lateral femoral notch sign is correlated with concomitant posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus in patients with ACL tears [3]. However, little is known about whether the lateral femoral notch sign is a clinical indicator of greater dynamic anterior tibial laxity.

On the other hand, the coronal lateral collateral ligament (LCL) sign has been proposed to be correlated with an ACL-deficient knee with good interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities [6]. In studies conducted by Mitchell et al., the coronal LCL sign was suggested to be a marker for static laxity of the knee since greater anterior translation and internal rotation of the tibia were found [6, 7]. Although greater tibial anterior translation has been found with the presence of the coronal LCL sign, little is known about the correlation between the coronal LCL sign and dynamic anterior tibial laxity.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the lateral femoral notch sign as well as the coronal LCL sign and anterior tibial translation using the GNRB arthrometer in patients with ACL injuries. We hypothesized that the lateral femoral notch sign and the coronal LCL sign would reflect greater anterior tibial laxity.

Materials and methods

Patients

This study was a retrospective review performed in a tertiary medical center. After approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital (A-ER-110-437), a retrospective review was performed on a cohort of all patients diagnosed with ACL tears at the authors’ institution between May 2020 and February 2022. Patients who had completed both an MRI and a GNRB arthrometer examination (Genourob, Laval, France) were included. Both exams were performed within 6 months after the injury. Patients with low resolution MRI, incomplete data from the chart review, previous ipsilateral knee ligament injuries or surgeries, and previous contralateral knee injury or surgeries were excluded. Relevant patient characteristics, including age, gender, and laterality, were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

Image analysis

The lateral femoral notch sign and the coronal LCL sign were evaluated from the patients’ MRI. The evaluations of these signs were performed separately by two operators (T-C H and C-K H) twice with a two-week interval between the evaluations. The intra- and inter-observer reliability were assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). ICC values less than 0.5, between 0.5 and 0.75, between 0.75 and 0.9, and greater than 0.90 are indicative of poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability, respectively [8]. Imaging measurements were performed via a picture archiving and communication system (INFINITT PACS, INFINITT Healthcare Co. Ltd., South Korea).

The lateral femoral notch sign was identified on a T1-weighted sagittal MRI. The notch depth was measured as the distance between the deepest portion of the sulcus and the tangent line connecting the anterior and posterior edge of the lateral femoral notch [3] (Fig. 1). Based on previous studies [2, 3, 9, 10], a notch sign was considered to be positive if the notch depth was greater than 2.0 mm. A positive notch sign was further categorized into grade 1 (2.0 mm to 3.9 mm) and grade 2 (≥4.0 mm) [2]. We also measured the length of the notch sign, defined as the length of the tangent line between the anterior and posterior of the lateral femoral notch. The coronal T2 image or proton density image slices were reviewed on the MRI for the coronal LCL sign. The coronal LCL sign was considered positive when the LCL could be observed entirely from the femoral origin to the fibular insertion in a single coronal slice on the MRI image (Fig. 2) [6, 7].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Measurement of the lateral femoral notch sign. The notch sign was measured on a sagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging based on the tangent method following a previous study [3]

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Positive coronal LCL sign (red arrows) in magnetic resonance imaging

Full size image

Knee anterior tibial translation measurement

The GNRB arthrometer (displacement in millimeters, with a 0.1 mm accuracy) was used to evaluate knee laxity by measuring the anterior tibial translation (Fig. 3). In accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturer of the GNRB (Genourob, Laval, France), the knee was placed in 20° flexion at a 0° rotation in a molded support in order to reproduce the typical Lachman test position [11, 12]. The data were automatically collected in the computer. The examinations were performed for both knees, and the side-to-side difference (SSD) between the injured knee and the healthy knee was calculated at each force level (89, 134, 150, and 200 N) for each subject with a 0.1 mm accuracy. For each applied force, the anterior tibial translation was measured simultaneously using the navigation system (3 measurements per knee). The displacement-force curve was created, and the slope of the curve was calculated. Slope 1 (S1) was defined as the slope of the curve ranging between 0 and 100 N, whereas slope 2 (S2) defined as the slope of the curve ranging between 100 N and the maximum force. The SSDs in S1 and S2 between the injured knee and healthy knee were calculated for the analysis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The setup of the GBRB arthrometer system

Full size image

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics version 20 software (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations were obtained. A chi-square test was used for the purpose of comparing the between-group categorical data. The Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to compare the between-group parameters. The Spearman correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between nonparametric variables. Statistical significance was set as p ≤ 0.05. Post-hoc power analyses were performed with G*Power Version 3.1.3 (Heinrich Heine-University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany) to calculate the achieved power. An alpha equal to 0.05 was given.

Results

Demographic data

Forty-six patients were initially included in the study. Four patients were excluded due to incomplete data, and 42 patients were finally enrolled for the analysis. The basic characteristics were summarized in (Table 1). Six patients (14.3%) had the positive lateral femoral notch sign, the average notch depth and notch width of which were 2.30 ± 0.2 mm and 14.7 ± 2.9 mm, respectively. All these positive notch signs were graded as grade 1 notch signs. Meanwhile, 14 patients (33.3%) in the study had positive coronal LCL signs. The mean age and gender distribution were the same for the aforementioned subgroups (Table 1). The interobserver repeatability and intraobserver repeatability of notch width, notch depth and LCL signs were summarized in Table 2.

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the different notch sign groups and the coronal LCL sign groups
Full size table
Table 2 The interobserver repeatability and intraobserver repeatability of notch width, notch depth and the coronal LCL sign
Full size table

Dynamic anterior tibial translation

The anterior tibial translation under different loads and slopes of the displacement-force curve from the GNRB for the different notch sign groups and the coronal LCL sign groups are summarized in Table 3. The SSDs of an anterior tibial translation under 134 N was the same for the positive notch sign group (3.8 ± 1.4 mm) and the negative notch group (4.0 ± 1.8 mm) (p = 0.875). Meanwhile, the SSD for S2 from the GNRB displacement-force curve was the same for the positive notch sign group (12.5 ± 8.9 mm/N) and the negative notch group (9.3 ± 6.8 mm/N) (p = 0.449). On the other hand, the SSDs in the anterior tibial translation under 134 N were the same for the positive coronal LCL sign group (3.9 ± 1.9 mm) and the negative coronal LCL sign group (4.0 ± 1.7 mm) (p = 0.722). The SSD of S2 from the GNRB displacement-force curve was the same for the positive coronal LCL sign group (10.7 ± 6.7 mm/N) and the negative coronal LCL sign group (9.2 ± 7.3 mm/N) (p = 0.348). The calculated effect sizes for these data ranged from 0.61 to 0.74. With a given α equal to 0.05, the post hoc achieved powers ranged from 48 to 61%.

Table 3 Mean anterior tibial translation and slope of displacement-force curve for the different notch sign groups and the coronal LCL sign groups
Full size table

There were no significant correlations between the anterior tibial translation SSD under different loads in the GNRB and the measured notch depth as well as notch width. Meanwhile, the notch depth and notch width were also not found to be correlated with the SSDs of S1 and S2 from the GNRB displacement-force curve. The detailed data are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4 The Spearman correlation between the parameters measured from the GNRB and the measured notch depth and notch width
Full size table

Discussion

The major finding of the current study was that there were no significant differences in parameters measured from the GNRB between the positive and negative notch sign groups or between the positive and negative coronal LCL sign groups. The lateral femoral notch sign, which is associated with concomitant posterior root tears in patients with ACL injuries [3], potentially leads to greater knee instability [13, 14]. Meanwhile, the greater static tibial anterior translation has been found in patients with ACL injuries with the positive coronal LCL sign [6, 7]. The present study further investigated whether the presence of the lateral femoral notch sign and the coronal LCL sign lead to greater dynamic anterior tibial laxity.

No correlation between the coronal LCL sign and the dynamic tibial anterior translation was found in the present study. The coronal LCL sign is a new concept. Previous studies have indicated that patients with the positive coronal LCL sign have greater tibia anterior translation in the resting position [6, 7]. Since the findings from the images represent static laxity of the knee, the present study was aimed toward further evaluation of the correlation between the coronal LCL sign and anterior tibial laxity using the GNRB arthrometer. Different from the hypothesis, the results suggested that the coronal LCL sign had limited predictive in terms of dynamic anterior tibial laxity.

The lateral femoral notch sign in MRI is not uncommon, and its clinical relevance is still under investigation. A recent study in patients with ACL tears reported that identifying the lateral femoral notch sign in an MRI may be predictive of concomitant posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus [3], which has been reported to be related to greater anterior tibia translation during the pivot-shift test [13, 14] and a trend toward greater tibial translation during the Lachman test [14]. The current study provided a direct evaluation of the correlation between the lateral femoral notch sign and anterior tibial laxity using the GNRB arthrometer. Different from the hypothesis made in the study, the results suggested that the use the lateral femoral notch sign alone without identifying other structural injuries failed to predict dynamic anterior laxity of knee. Although the lateral femoral notch sign was not related to dynamic anterior knee laxity, it was reported to be correlated with increased rotatory laxity after ACL injury [15]. Therefore, identifying the lateral femoral notch sign remains clinically valuable.

Although the data from different studies could not be compared directly, the data acquired in the present study were generally consistent with those in the previous studies on this topic. The prevalence of the notch sign in our study group was 14.3% (6/42), which was compatible with that found in the previous studies, ranging from 3.2 to 52% [2, 15,16,17,18,19]. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability values were also similar, where in previous studies, they were 0.91 and 0.90 to 0.94, respectively [15, 16], and in the present study, they were 0.86 and 0.89 /0.93, respectively.

There were several limitations in the study. First, this is a retrospective study which made it difficult to obtain data. However, we managed to obtain all the data and basic characteristics for the study. Selection bias is also common drawback of a retrospective study. Secondly, our sample sizes and the achieved powers in the analyses were relatively small. As the present study acted like a pilot study, future studies on the related topics with larger sample sizes or collaboration studies from different departments will be warranted in order to provide sufficient statistical power [20]. Third, the quality of the MRI could not be fully controlled since the study was a retrospective design. The majority of MRIs were acquired in a consistent position, the supine position with the knee at 10° to 15° of flexion and a neutral rotation, even if positioning inconsistencies possibly existed due to < 10% of images being obtained at an outside facility. Fourth, the presence of concomitant soft tissue injuries was not evaluated in the present study. Instead, the relationship between the included signs and dynamic anterior tibial laxity were directly evaluated.

Conclusion

The presence of the lateral femoral notch sign and the coronal LCL sign did not indicate greater dynamic tibial laxity as measured using the GNRB.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Mouton C, Gokeler A, Urhausen A, Nuhrenborger C, Seil R. High incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries within the first 2 months of the season in amateur team ball sports. Sports Health. 2022;14(2):183–7.

  2. Herbst E, Hoser C, Tecklenburg K, Filipovic M, Dallapozza C, Herbort M, et al. The lateral femoral notch sign following ACL injury: frequency, morphology and relation to meniscal injury and sports activity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(8):2250–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berthold DP, Muench LN, Herbst E, Mayr F, Chadayammuri V, Imhoff AB, et al. High prevalence of a deep lateral femoral notch sign in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and concomitant posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(4):1018–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wissman RD, England E, Mehta K, Nepute J, Von Fischer N, Apgar J, et al. Patellotibial contusions in anterior cruciate ligament tears. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(2):247–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon KH, Yoo JH, Kim KI. Bone contusion and associated meniscal and medial collateral ligament injury in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(16):1510–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell BC, Siow MY, Bastrom T, Bomar JD, Pennock AT, Parvaresh K, et al. Coronal lateral collateral ligament sign: a novel magnetic resonance imaging sign for identifying anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees in adolescents and summarizing the extent of anterior Tibial translation and Femorotibial internal rotation. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(4):928–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell BC, Siow MY, Bastrom T, Bomar JD, Pennock AT, Parvaresh K, et al. Predictive value of the magnetic resonance imaging-based coronal lateral collateral ligament sign on adolescent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft failure. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(4):935–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffelner T, Pichler I, Moroder P, Osti M, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, et al. Segmentation of the lateral femoral notch sign with MRI using a new measurement technique. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanakamedala AC, Burnham JM, Pfeiffer TR, Herbst E, Kowalczuk M, Popchak A, et al. Lateral femoral notch depth is not associated with increased rotatory instability in ACL-injured knees: a quantitative pivot shift analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(5):1399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pouderoux T, Muller B, Robert H. Joint laxity and graft compliance increase during the first year following ACL reconstruction with short hamstring tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(6):1979–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saravia A, Cabrera S, Molina CR, Pacheco L, Munoz G. Validity of the Genourob arthrometer in the evaluation of total thickness tears of anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop. 2020;22:203–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frank JM, Moatshe G, Brady AW, Dornan GJ, Coggins A, Muckenhirn KJ, et al. Lateral meniscus posterior root and Meniscofemoral ligaments as stabilizing structures in the ACL-deficient knee: a biomechanical study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(6):2325967117695756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shybut TB, Vega CE, Haddad J, Alexander JW, Gold JE, Noble PC, et al. Effect of lateral meniscal root tear on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):905–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucidi GA, Grassi A, Di Paolo S, Agostinone P, Neri MP, Macchiarola L, et al. The lateral femoral notch sign is correlated with increased rotatory laxity after anterior cruciate ligament injury: pivot shift quantification with a surgical navigation system. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(3):649–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimitriou D, Reimond M, Foesel A, Baumgaertner B, Zou D, Tsai TY, et al. The deep lateral femoral notch sign: a reliable diagnostic tool in identifying a concomitant anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(6):1968–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fayad LM, Parellada JA, Parker L, Schweitzer ME. MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament tears: is there a gender gap? Skelet Radiol. 2003;32(11):639–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garth WP Jr, Greco J, House MA. The lateral notch sign associated with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(1):68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu JS, Bosch E, Pathria MN, McAndless M, Mishra D, Daniel D, et al. Deep lateral femoral sulcus: study of 124 patients with anterior cruciate ligament tear. Emerg Radiol. 1995;2(3):129–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehler DMA, Edelsbrunner PA, Matić K. Appreciating the significance of non-significant findings in psychology. J Eur Psychol Stud. 2019;10(4):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Skeleton Materials and Bio-compatibility Core Lab, Research Center of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital and National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan (NCKUH-11101005 and 11107005) for the assistance of this project.

Funding

This study was funded by National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan (NCKUH-11101005 and 11107005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, Taiwan, 70428

    Tzu-Ching Huang, Chih-Kai Hong, Kai-Lan Hsu, Fa-Chuan Kuan & Wei-Ren Su

  2. Physical Therapy Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Zhao-Wei Liu

  3. Skeleton Materials and Bio-compatibility Core Lab, Research Center of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Chih-Kai Hong, Kai-Lan Hsu, Fa-Chuan Kuan & Wei-Ren Su

  4. Department of Nursing, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Chi-Hsiu Wang

  5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Kai-Lan Hsu

  6. Musculoskeletal Research Center, Innovation Headquarter, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Wei-Ren Su

Authors
  1. Tzu-Ching Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhao-Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chih-Kai Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chi-Hsiu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kai-Lan Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fa-Chuan Kuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wei-Ren Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TCH, CKH and WRS contributed to the concept. TCH, and CKH analyzed the data. TCH, ZWL, and CHW collected the data and complete the measurements. TCH and CKH draft the manuscript. KLH, FCK and WRS revised the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Kai Hong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital (A-ER-110-437). Informed consent to participate was waived in this retrospective image review study by Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not available.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, TC., Liu, ZW., Hong, CK. et al. The lateral femoral notch sign and coronal lateral collateral ligament sign in magnetic resonance imaging failed to predict dynamic anterior tibial laxity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 402 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05368-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05368-9

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us