Skip to main content
Download PDF

Glenohumeral joint dislocation is rare in children with proximal humeral fractures: a descriptive study and literature review

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 23, Article number: 36 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Glenohumeral dislocation combined with fracture of the proximal humerus is extremely rare in children, and this study aims to investigate its incidence in the pediatric population and review the treatment strategy for this condition.

Methods

Between Jan 2014 and Jan 2019, 280 patients with unilateral proximal humeral fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging and follow-up notes were reviewed for patients with a predilection for glenohumeral joint dislocation. Six (2.14%) patients between the ages of 5 and 10 years were confirmed as glenohumeral joint dislocation and included in the study. All these patients underwent closed reduction and external fixation under general anesthesia.

Results

Out of 280 patients with proximal humeral fractures, only 6 patients, including 4 males and 2 females, were confirmed as glenohumeral joint dislocation. ROM was normal compared with the contralateral shoulder in every patient at the last follow-up. There was no case of radiological abnormality, including avascular necrosis or devascularization of the humeral head.

Conclusions

Glenohumeral dislocation is a rare entity associated with the proximal humerus fracture in children, with an overall incidence in our case series was 2.14%.

Reduction and stabilization of such injury using an external fixator is a suitable choice for pediatric patients that failed closed reduction.

Peer Review reports

Background

Fracture of the proximal humerus accounts for 2 to 5.4% of all fractures in the pediatric population [1, 2]. Nonsurgical treatment remains the primary choice for such fracture because of the tremendous remodeling potential in children [2, 3]. However, glenohumeral joint dislocation combined with fracture of the humerus is extremely rare in children. Open/closed reduction followed by surgical stabilization using Kirschner wire (KW) or elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) has been reported in a handful of case reports [4]. Nelson G. et al. published a study of 220 pediatric proximal humerus fractures without any incidence of glenohumeral joint dislocation [5].

Shoulder fracture-dislocation in the adult population is another scenario. In the geriatric population, iatrogenic fracture during shoulder dislocation reduction is increasingly common [6]; however, this phenomenon is rarely observed in children. In adults with greater tuberosity fracture-dislocations, closed reduction attempts might be successful in some cases [7], but open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is usually warranted for displaced shoulder fracture-dislocation [8,9,10]. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is generally indicated in the elderly with severely comminuted fracture-dislocations [11].

This study aims to investigate the prevalence of glenohumeral joint dislocation in children with fractures of the proximal humerus and review the treatment method we adopted to treat such injuries.

Methods

Between January 2014 and January 2019, 280 patients with unilateral proximal humeral fractures were retrospectively reviewed (Table 1). The patients’ radiographic imaging and follow-up notes were reviewed in detail with a predilection for glenohumeral joint dislocation.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of children with proximal humeral fractures
Full size table

Inclusion criteria were: Patients under the age of 14 years or less at the time of injury having a follow-up period of 3 weeks or more. Exclusion criteria were: (1) patients older than 14 years, (2) bilateral fractures, (3) open fractures or pathological fractures, including metabolic disorders, tumor, neuromuscular diseases, and (4) incomplete medical and radiological records.

Demographic information, including age, sex, mechanism of injury, and additional imaging, were collected from the hospital database. After the complete evaluation of the medical and radiological records of all 280 patients, 6 (2.14%) patients aged between 5 and 10 years were confirmed to have glenohumeral joint fracture-dislocation and had been treated with closed reduction and external fixation (EF) under general anaesthesia. Patients’ guardians were contacted via phone calls or social media (WeChat APP) and were requested to visit the hospital for final evaluation.

Follow-up data, including length discrepancy of the humerus (LDH), range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder joint [12], and any complications, were recorded at every follow-up visit and the last follow-up visit. LDH was measured radiologically and clinically. Radiological LDH was measured as the difference of humeral length (the highest point of the humeral head to the lowest point of trochlea) between two arms on standard AP view. Clinical LDH was measured as hands together with back against the wall and measuring the difference between the tip of middle fingers. After a 2-year follow-up, LDH was measured clinically only. Active ROM was recorded during every visit using a goniometer by the attending surgeon and compared with the contralateral shoulder. Less than 5 degrees difference of ROM than the contralateral shoulder was considered normal. The shoulder function was evaluated using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale (ASES) [13].

Surgical technique for glenohumeral joint dislocation with proximal humeral fractures in children

All the patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia in the supine position. The manual reduction was attempted in all cases before surgical stabilization. The procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Initially, the physis of the proximal humerus was identified. One or two Schanz pins were inserted into the metaphyseal region or epiphysis of the proximal fragment, and 2 Schanz pins were inserted into the humerus shaft. A small incision (5 mm) was made in the proximal humerus, followed by blunt dissection using hemostatic forceps until the bony surface was ascertained in order to avoid axillary nerve injuries. The Schanz pin was then introduced on the bony surface before drilling. The Schanz Pin was connected in the fixator, and then the glenohumeral dislocation could be easily reduced. Minor readjustment might be necessary to deliver a better fracture alignment (See Fig. 1). Occasionally, in patients with physeal injury, an additional KW is placed in the direction of humeral calcar across the physis to provide better stability (See Fig. 2). After the surgery, an arm sling or shoulder abduction brace was usually used for 3–4 weeks. Active ROM of the shoulder joint was initiated after removal of the sling or brace at 4 weeks. Subsequently, the patient was followed-up at every 2–3 months on an out-patient basis, and the external fixator was removed at 6–8 weeks postoperatively. Routinely, the active exercises were taught to the parents by the rehabilitation technician, and the patients were advised to perform home exercises under the guidance of their parents. Routine pin care was performed by the parents.

Fig. 1
figure 1

6-year-old girl with proximal humeral epiphyseal SH II fracture and shoulder dislocation. A Radiograph of humerus before surgery. B Radiograph of intraoperative reduction. C Radiograph of the shoulder joint after reduction. D Radiograph of the shoulder joint after surgery. E Radiograph of the humerus at 1-month follow-up. F Radiograph of the humerus at 2-month follow-up. G Radiograph of the humerus at 4-year follow-up

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

5-year-old boy with proximal humeral epiphyseal fracture SH I and shoulder dislocation. A Radiograph of humerus before surgery. B 3D reconstruction of CT scan. C Radiograph of the humerus after surgery. D Radiograph of the humerus at 1-month follow-up. E Radiograph of the humerus at 3-month follow-up. F Radiograph of the humerus at 6-month follow-up. G Radiograph of the humerus at 4-year follow-up

Full size image

Results

Among the available 6 patients, 4 were males and 2 were females (Table 2). All patients were classified as Neer-Horwitz IV. The average age of the patients was 7.8 (5–10) years. The etiology of fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus in 4 patients was accidental falls, and that in 2 patients were motor vehicle accidents. The average duration from injury to surgery was 1.5 (1–2) days. Five patients had an anterior dislocation, while one suffered a posterior dislocation. Three patients had epiphyseal fractures, while remaining 3 patients had metaphyseal fractures. The average hospital stay was 3.3 (3–4) days (Table 2). The average follow-up period was 5 (3–7) years.

Table 2 Parameters of patients and operation
Full size table

As shown in Table 3, ROM was normal in every patient at the last follow-up. Similarly, the average ASES was 96.8 (96–98) points at the last follow-up. The average LDH was 1.8 (1–3) mm at the last follow-up. The average angulation was 2.2 (1–3) degrees at the last follow-up without an apparent tendency of varus or valgus. Only one patient suffered from pin tract infection and was controlled successfully with oral antibiotics. There was no case of radiological abnormality, including avascular necrosis.

Table 3 Clinical parameters of follow-up
Full size table

Discussion

AP and lateral radiograph of the shoulder joint are routine for the patient with a suspected proximal humeral fracture, and sometimes scapular-Y or axillary view might be required to rule out glenohumeral joint dislocation. However, because of the pain and noncompliance by the injured children, usually nonstandard AP and lateral view of the shoulder joint or proximal humerus was obtained during the out-patient visit. Fortunately, glenohumeral joint dislocation in children is rare [5]. Nevertheless, there were still 6 cases of shoulder dislocation in our study, and all cases were confirmed by additional CT scan. CT scan is generally not indicated in children with proximal humeral fractures since the incidence of shoulder dislocation is extremely rare. Most of the CT scans in our study were ordered by physicians in Emergency Department, not by an orthopedic specialist. All 6 patients with shoulder fracture-dislocation were classified as Neer-Horwitz IV, and therefore patients with severe fracture displacement require discretion and might warrant additional imaging. Moreover, for patients with high energy injuries such as motor vehicle accident, fall from height and serious contact sports injuries, advanced imaging is recommended to rule out the shoulder dislocation.

In our small series, the external fixator proved to be an effective method for treating traumatic fracture-dislocation of the shoulder in children after failed manual reduction, without the necessity of open reduction.

Shoulder dislocation is rare in children, and less than 2% of shoulder dislocation occurs in children younger than 10 years [14]. Although isolated fracture of the proximal humerus is not rare in children, so far, only 12 case reports of fracture-dislocation of the shoulder younger than 11-year-old have been reported in the literature [4, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. In the 12 case reports, 8 patients underwent open reduction (OR), and the remaining 4 patients underwent closed reduction followed by percutaneous pinning [16, 17, 19, 23]. Among 8 patients who underwent OR, KW was used in 6 cases [15, 18, 20,21,22, 24], ESIN was used in one patient [4], and no hardware was used in an 11-month-old child [25]. In our study, all 6 patients were reduced by closed method with the help of the external fixator.

It is challenging to reduce the fracture by the closed method in case of concomitant dislocation of the ipsilateral shoulder [5, 15, 19, 23]. When the fracture is reduced and stabilized, the dislocation can be easily reduced [5, 15, 23]. Therefore, we initially reduced the fracture and stabilized using an external fixator prior to the reduction of dislocation, as mentioned in a case report by Micic et al. [26]. However, the Schanz pin placement is more challenging in children with open growth plates. Utilization of both KW and ESIN have been reported in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture in children, but in fracture-dislocation injuries, KW and ESIN are not able to facilitate the reduction. In such a case, EF provides robust and accurate fixation, which is one of the reasons we utilized EF in fracture-dislocation.

Pin tract infection is a common complication in EF [27]. In our case series, 1 patient had a superficial infection that healed uneventfully with oral antibiotics and local wound care. There was no case of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head and growth disturbances. The reason might be that the placement of Schanz pin was performed under the guidance of fluoroscopy, and the reduction was performed in a closed fashion. In contrast, Wang et al. reported epiphyseal devascularization in a 10-year-old boy with fracture-dislocation of the shoulder [16], whereas Lee et al. reported AVN on the humeral head in a 16-year-old boy [28]. In both cases, open reduction was performed.

Bankart lesion has been reported in adolescents with shoulder dislocation [29]. However, no such lesion was observed in our study possibly because Bankart is more likely to happen in older children with shoulder dislocation in the absence of humeral fractures.

There were several limitations in our study. It was a retrospective study from a single medical center. Fracture-dislocation is a rare condition with 2.1% incidence in our study, and our treatment strategy using an external fixator is of the limited reference value because this technique requires a long learning curve and fluoroscopy guidance. Besides, ASES is not fully validated in children, and the clinical outcomes might not be thoroughly and meticulously measured [30].

Conclusion

Glenohumeral dislocation is a rare entity associated with the proximal humerus fracture in children, with an overall incidence in our case series was 2.14%.

Reduction and stabilization of such injury using an external fixator is a suitable choice for pediatric patients that failed closed reduction.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusion of this article are included within the article. Upon request, raw data can be provided by the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

EF:

External fixation

LDH:

Length discrepancy of humerus

ROM:

Range of motion

KW:

Kirschner wire

ESIN:

Elastic stable intramedullary nail

ASES:

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale

AVN:

Avascular necrosis

OR:

Open reduction

References

  1. Hannonen J, Hyvönen H, Korhonen L, Serlo W, Sinikumpu JJ. The incidence and treatment trends of pediatric proximal humerus fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Popkin CA, Levine WN, Ahmad CS. Evaluation and management of pediatric proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(2):77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaus GW, Carry PM, Pishkenari AK, Hadley-Miller N. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humeral physeal fractures: a matched cohort. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;35(3):234–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin S, Cai H, Xu Y. Shoulder dislocation combined with proximal humerus fracture in children: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(48):e8977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson G, Brown C, Liu RW. No incidence of glenohumeral joint dislocation in a review of 220 paediatric proximal humerus fractures. J Child Orthop. 2018;12(5):493–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan X, Yao Y, Yan H, Wang J, Dai L, Qu X, et al. Iatrogenic fracture during shoulder dislocation reduction: characteristics, management and outcomes. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(1):73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Green A, Choi P, Lubitz M, Aaron DL, Swart E. Proximal Humerus fracture dislocations: which patterns can be reduced in the ED? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;S1058-2746(21):00710–2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paparoidamis G, Iliopoulos E, Narvani AA, Levy O, Tsiridis E, Polyzois I. Posterior shoulder fracture-dislocation: a systematic review of the literature and current aspects of management. Chin J Traumatol. 2021;24(1):18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spross C, Farei-Campagna JM, Gerhard P, Jost B, Yates PJ, Lam LO. Osteochondral Shearing Fracture of the Humeral Head Associated with Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2021;11(3).

  10. Flint JH, Carlyle LM, Christiansen CC, Nepola JV. Case report and literature review anterior shoulder dislocation with three-part proximal humerus fracture and humeral shaft fracture. Iowa Orthop J. 2009;29:105–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Seidel HD, Bhattacharjee S, Koh JL, Strelzow JA, Shi LL. Acute versus delayed reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(19):832–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu H, Joo S, Kim J, Kim JK, Kim C, Seo J, et al. Validity and reliability of POM-checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: protocol for a single center comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(25):e11082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kocher MS, Horan MP, Briggs KK, Richardson TR, O'Holleran J, Hawkins RJ. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(9):2006–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bishop JY, Flatow EL. Pediatric shoulder trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(432):41–8.

  15. Nicastro JF, Adair DM. Fracture-dislocation of the shoulder in a 32- month-old child. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2:427–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang P Jr, Koval KJ, Lehman W, Strongwater A, Grant A, Zuckerman JD. Salter–Harris type III fracture dislocation of the proximal humerus. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;6:219–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Winmoon C, Sathira-Angkura V, Kunakornsawat S, Prasartritha T. Fracture dislocation of the glenohumeral joint in a 2-year-old child: case report. J Trauma. 2003;54:372–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nugpok O, Menon J, Satyanarayana P. Fracture dislocation shoulder in 3-year old. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2010;20:333–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta R, Singh A, Singh KK, Vohra R. Fracture of proximal humerus with dislocation of glenohumeral joint in a 3 year old child: a case report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2013;3:26–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Azevedo J, Maia B, Correia J. Fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus in a 6-year-old child: case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:16–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Isil M, Subasi M, Cebesoy O, Koca I, Pamukcu U. Traumatic shoulder fracturedislocation in a 7-year-old child: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2013;7:156–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jonghun JI, Shafi M, Park SE, Park PY. A severely displaced metaphyseal fracture of the proximal humerus with dislocation of the shoulder in a child. Chin J Traumatol. 2014;17:54–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hong S, Nho JH, Lee CJ, Kim JB, Choi HS. Posterior shoulder dislocation with ipsilateral proximal humerus type 2 physeal fracture: case report. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015;24:215–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Omari AA, Alrawashdeh M, Obeidat O, Al-Rusan M, Essa SB, Radaideh AM, et al. Entrapped long head of biceps tendon in pediatric proximal humerus fracture dislocation: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;67:102510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Young JR, Mantica AL. Open Reduction of a Fracture-Dislocation of the Shoulder in an 11-Month-Old Child: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2021;11(2).

  26. Micic ID, Mitkovic MB, Mladenovic DS. Unreduced chronic dislocation of the humeral head with ipsilateral humeral shaft fracture: a case report. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:578–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernardo LM. Evidence-based practice for pin site care in injured children. Orthop Nurs. 2001;20(5):29–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee SH, Lee DH, Baek JR. Proximal humerus salter type III physeal injury with posterior dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:143–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Olds M, Donaldson K, Ellis R, Kersten P. In children 18 years and under, what promotes recurrent shoulder instability after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(18):1135–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Heyworth B, Cohen L, von Heideken J, Kocher MS, Iversen MD. Validity and comprehensibility of outcome measures in children with shoulder and elbow disorders: creation of a new pediatric and adolescent shoulder and elbow survey (Pedi-ASES). J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(7):1162–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Pan Hong, Xin Tang & Jin Li

  2. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Blue Cross Hospital, Tripureswor, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal

    Saroj Rai

  3. The First Clinical School, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

    Ruikang Liu

Authors
  1. Pan Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saroj Rai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruikang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xin Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JL* is in charge of the main idea and is the guarantor of integrity of the entire clinical study; PH and SR is in charge of the study concepts, design, manuscript preparation and editing; PH and SR are in charge of the language polishing and the grammar revision; RL, and XT is in charge of the collection of the study data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (IORG No: IORG0003571) gave a final approval on 20/11/2019 for the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consents to participate in this study were obtained from the legal guardians of every patient.

Consent for publication

Informed consents were obtained from the legal guardians of every patient in.

this study for publication of this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, P., Rai, S., Liu, R. et al. Glenohumeral joint dislocation is rare in children with proximal humeral fractures: a descriptive study and literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 36 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04992-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04992-1

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us