Shah N, Porter M. Evolution of cemented stems. Orthopaedics. 2005;28(8 Suppl):s819–25.
Google Scholar
Bedard NA, Callaghan JJ, Stefl MD, Liu SS. Systematic review of literature of cemented femoral components: what is the durability at minimum 20 years follow-up? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(2):563–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Kazi HA, Whitehouse SL, Howell JR, Timperley AJ. Not all cemented hips are the same: a register-based (NJR) comparison of taper-slip and composite beam femoral stems. Acta Orthop. 2019;90(3):214–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Petheram TG, Whitehouse SL, Kazi HA, et al. The Exeter universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: a report of 382 hips. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(11):1441–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Westerman RW, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW, Timperley AJ, Howell JR, Wilson MJ. The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up: the first 540 cases. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(8):1002–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Junnila M, Laaksonen I, Eskelinen A, et al. Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic arthroplasty register association database. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(6):546–53.
Article
Google Scholar
Morita D, Iwase T, Ito T. Bone resorption with cemented Exeter universal stem – three-years longitudinal DEXA study in 165 hips for femur. J Orthop Sci. 2016;21(3):336–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Triple taper polished cemented stem in total hip arthroplasty: rationale for the design, surgical technique, and 7 years of clinical experience. J Arthroplast. 2001;16(8 suppl 1):37–41.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Buckland AJ, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD, Hardidge AJ, Ng KW, Choong PFM. Periprosthetic bone remodeling using a triple-taper polished cemented stem in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(7):1083–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Ebramzadeh E, Sarmiento A, HA MK, Llinas A, Gogan W. The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76(1):77–87.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. a fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77(12):1845–52.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kawate K, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, SA SAB, Jasty M, Harris WH. Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:70–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Maloney WJ, Schmalzried T, Harris WH. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:70–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Langlais F, Kerboull M, Sedel L, Ling RSM. The ‘French paradox.’. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85(1):17–20.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
El Masri F, Kerboull L, Kerboull M, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M. Is the so-called 'French paradox' a reality?: long-term survival and migration of the Charnley-Kerboull stem cemented line-to-line. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92(3):342–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Scheerlinck T, de Mey J, Deklerck R, Noble PC. CT analysis of defects of the cement mantle and alignment of the stem: in vitro comparison of Charnley-Kerboull femoral hip implants inserted line-to-line and undersized in paired femora. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(1):19–25.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Skinner JA, Todo S, Taylor M, Wang JS, Pinskerova V, Scott G. Should the cement mantle around the femoral component be thick or thin? J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85(1):45–51.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Imura S. Evaluation chart of hip joint functions. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1995;69(9):864–7 (in Japanese).
Google Scholar
Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74(3):385–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.
Google Scholar
Harris WH, WA MG. Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cementing technique. Follow-up note with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986;68(7):1064–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJ, Ling RS. Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988;19(3):477–89.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Purbach B, Kay PR, Siney PD, Fleming PA, Wroblewski BM. The C-stem in clinical practice: fifteen-year follow-up of a triple tapered polished cemented stem. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(8):1367–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Young L, Duckett S, Dunn A. The use of the cemented Exeter Universal femoral stem in a district general hospital: a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91(2):170–5.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Schuroff AA, Deeke M, Pedroni MA, Lupselo FS, Rodrigo Kunz E, Lima AM. Radiographic evaluation of cementation technique using polished, conical, triple-tapered femoral stem in hip arthroplasty. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017;52(Suppl 1):40–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Flatøy B, Röhrl SM, Rydinge J, Dahl J, Diep LM, Nordsletten L. Triple taper stem design shows promising fixation and bone remodeling characteristics: radiostereometric analysis in a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2015;97(6):755–61.
Article
Google Scholar
Yates PJ, Burston BJ, Whitley E, Bannister GC. Collarless polished tapered stem: clinical and radiological results at a minimum of ten years' follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90(1):16–22.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar