Skip to main content

Tributyltin perturbs femoral cortical architecture and polar moment of inertia in rat

Abstract

Background

Tributyltin, a well-known endocrine disruptor, is widely used in agriculture and industry. Previous studies have shown that tributyltin could cause deleterious effects on bone health by impairing the adipo-osteogenic balance in bone marrow.

Methods

To investigate further the effects of tributyltin on bone, weaned male SD rats were treated with tributyltin (0.5, 5 or 50 μg·kg− 1) or corn oil by gavage once every 3 days for 60 days in this study. Then, we analyzed the effects of tributyltin on geometry, the polar moment of inertia, mineral content, relative abundances of mRNA from representative genes related to adipogenesis and osteogenesis, serum calcium ion and inorganic phosphate levels.

Results

Micro-computed tomography analysis revealed that treatment with 50 μg·kg− 1 tributyltin caused an obvious decrease in femoral cortical cross sectional area, marrow area, periosteal circumference and derived polar moment of inertia in rats. However, other test results showed that exposure to tributyltin resulted in no significant changes in the expression of genes detected, femoral cancellous architecture, ash content, as well as serum calcium ion and inorganic phosphate levels.

Conclusions

Exposure to a low dose of tributyltin from the prepubertal to adult stage produced adverse effects on skeletal architecture and strength.

Peer Review reports

Background

Osteoporosis is an emerging medical and socioeconomic threat characterized by systemic impairment of bone mass and microarchitecture that increases the propensity for fragility fractures [1], and has become a serious public health problem [2, 3]. Genetic and environmental factors play key roles in the development of osteoporosis [4]. Mounting evidence obtained from studies on animal models and population studies revealed that exposure to endocrine disruptors (EDs) negatively affected bone health [5,6,7,8]. Tributyltin chloride (TBT), a notorious ED, is widely used in wood preservatives, disinfection of industrial circulation water, antifouling coatings for ships and slime treatment in paper mills [9]. Human exposure to TBT occurs mainly through consumption of contaminated dietary sources [9]. In one investigation of Mattos et al. on butyltin (BT) contamination in Northern Chilean coast, the calculated consumption of BT might exceed the tolerable daily intake recommended by European Food Safety Authority in the most contaminated sites [10]. Moreover, high levels of BTs have been detected in human liver tissue [11] and blood samples [12]. Previous studies showed that exposure to high dose TBT (over 10 mg·kg− 1) during gestation period caused delayed ossification of the fetal skeleton [13, 14]. Our previous study revealed that exposure to a low dose of TBT (50 μg·kg− 1) reduced the femoral bone mineral density (BMD) of rats with a downtrend of biomechanical strength [15].

Although measurement of BMD is an indispensable tool to identify individuals at high risk of injury, bone densitometry affords only a two dimensional areal view of the three dimensional mineralized mass of the skeleton [4]. Micro-computed tomography (μCT) is the most common technique for the nondestructive assessment and analysis of the three-dimensional bone architecture. There were two papers using μCT to assess the effect of TBT on bone [16, 17]. However, they both used adult female rodents. Although osteopenia is more serious in women than men, there is a 20% osteoporotic fracture risk in white men [2]. Moreover, skeletal growth is rapid during adolescence, and exposure to EDs before and during puberty therefore results in greater deficits at a site than exposure after puberty [18]. In this study, we would furtherly assess the effect of TBT on bone based on femoral cancellous and cortical architecture using μCT, derived polar moment of inertia (Jo), ash content (mineral content), serum calcium ion (Ca2+) and inorganic phosphate (Pi) levels, and expression of genes related to adipogenesis and osteogenesis.

Methods

Reagents

TBT (purity ≥96%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Co. (St Louis, MO). Kits for determination of total protein, serum Ca2+ and Pi were from NanJing JianCheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). The QIAamp RNA Blood Mini Kit and QuantiTect SYBR® Green RT-PCR Kits were from QIAGEN (regional headquarter, Shanghai for Asia). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and were obtained from commercial sources.

Animals and treatment

21-day-old male SD rats were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. [License No. SCXK (Jing) 20,160,011]. After 3 days of acclimatization, rats were randomly assigned into four groups (10 rats per group) based on body weight to achieve similar average weights in different groups. Rats were treated with corn oil or TBT (0.5, 5 or 50 μg·kg− 1) by gavage once every 3 days from ages of 24 d to 84 d, while the established no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) of TBT was 25 μg·kg− 1·day− 1 based on immunological effects [19]. All rats were killed 1 day after the final gavage (85 d). All treatments of rats in this study were performed humanely in accordance with the National Institutes of Health’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and followed the principles described in the “Use of Animals in Toxicology,” which were approved by the Ethics Committees of the School of Public Health, Shandong University, in March 2019. The identification code was 20,190,204.

Preparation of serum and femurs

Urethane was dissolved in saline solution at a final concentration of 20% (w/v). The rats were anesthetized with urethane (~ 1.2 g·kg− 1) by introperitoneal injection. After reaching the surgical level of anesthesia, blood was obtained from the aorta ventralis. The serum was separated and stored at − 80 °C for further analysis. Both femurs were isolated modestly, and then the muscular tissue was removed. Five left femora were used to assess gene expression, and the other left femora were stored at − 20 °C for ash content analysis. All right femurs were weighed and measured as described in a previous study [15], and fixed in 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde for further research.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (QPCR)

Bone marrow (BM) was flushed from the left femur (n = 5 per group), and strained through a 70-μm cell strainer. After centrifugation, total RNA was extracted using the QIAamp RNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. The concentration and quality of RNA were determined with a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Gene Company Limited, USA). After quality inspection, RNA was stored at − 80 °C for QPCR.

QPCR was performed using QuantiTect SYBR® Green RT-PCR Kits (QIAGEN) with reactions scaled to 25 μl, and 25 ng mRNA was used in each reaction. PCRs (in duplicate) were performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) with a program consisting of 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and then 60 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 30 s, followed by melting curve analysis. The primer sequences for each gene are listed in Table S1. Genes of interest were normalized to the GAPDH gene in the same sample following the 2–ΔΔCT method [20]. Primers were designed using Primer-BLAST (NCBI) or Primer5 software (Rozen and Skaletsky 2000), and were verified by gradient amplification and melting curve analysis.

Micro-computed tomography (μCT)

The fixed femurs were scanned with a Scanco μCT100 scanner (Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland), at a 20 μm isotropic resolution using an integration time of 300 ms, energy of 70 kVp, and intensity of 200 μA. Gaussian filtering (sigma = 0.8, support = 1) was used to reduce background noise. For analyses of trabecular bone within the distal femur, the specimen was scanned in 700 slices and a region of interest (ROI) of trabecular bone was selected between 230 slices and 300 slices to the growth plate. Trabecular bone parameters of the femoral metaphysis, including bone volume fraction (BV/TV), connectivity density (Conn.D), structural model index (SMI), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), were determined using Scanco’s 3D analysis tools (direct model). For cortical bone analysis, the femur specimens were scanned similarly. One millimeter thick sections immediately distal to the mid-diaphysis were used as ROI. In addition, total cross sectional area (TCS.Ar), cortical cross sectional area (Ct.Ar), cortical thickness (Ct.th), periosteal circumference (Ps.Cf), endocortical circumference (Ec.Cf) and marrow area (Ma.Ar) were obtained from the analysis.

Calculation of Jo

Jo was calculated as the medio-lateral (IML) + antero-posterior (IAP) axes, following the method of Jepsen et al. [21].

Ash content

Five left femora per group were used to detect the ash content. The dried, and ash weights were determined as described previously [21]. Ash content was determined as the ash weight normalized for hydrated weight.

Serum parameters

Serum Ca2+ and Pi levels were detected by colorimetry, following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed by SPSS software, version 21.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to analyze the bone structural phenotype and Jo, which were compared between the two groups. Other indicators were analyzed by ANOVA. The significance level was set at 0.05. Once significance was established (P < 0.05), Dunnett’s or Dunnett’s T3 test was performed to make multiple comparisons among the groups based on the homogeneity of variance.

Results

Effect of TBT on body weight and femur

The mean body-weight of rats is shown in Fig.1. Rat body weights increased with prolonged feeding time, however, exposure to TBT caused no significant effects on the body weights at all time points observed compared to the control. Consistent with the body weight, TBT-treatment caused no significant differences in femoral length and weight at the end of the experiment (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Effects of TBT exposure on body weight. The body weight of rats was not affected by TBT exposure at all time points, n = 10

Table 1 Bone length and bone weight of rats

Effect of TBT on the mRNA expression of genes involved in adipogenesis and osteogenesis in BM

PPARγ is a key transcriptional regulator of fat formation [22], while Fabp4 and Angptl4 are their target genes [23, 24]. Runx2 and ALP are early osteogenic markers [25, 26] and osteocalcin (OC) is a late osteoblast differentiation marker [27].

Analysis with QPCR analysis showed no notable TBT-related changes in the expression of PPARγ, Fabp4, ALP and OC at 85 d (Fig.2). The relative expression of Fabp4 showed 1.69-, 1.68- and 1.48-fold increases in respective TBT groups, but the change was not significant (P = 0.153). Although the expression of Angptl4 showed a significant decrease in the 0.5 μg·kg− 1 and 5 μg·kg− 1 TBT groups compared with the control (P < 0.05), the degree of the decline was minor (− 29.79% and − 24.25%, respectively).

Fig. 2
figure2

Effect of TBT on genes expression related to adipogenesis and osteogenesis. Expression of PPARγ (a), Fabp4 (b), Angptl4 (c), ALP (d), OC (e) and Runx2 (f) under different treatments. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 5, *P<0.05, compared with control

Effect of TBT on microstructure of femur

Quantitative measures of trabecular bone quality showed a decreasing trend in the BV/TV (− 24.60%, P = 0.153) along with a decreasing trend in Conn. D (− 17.56%, P = 0.277), Tb. N (− 14.92%, P = 0.193), and a subtle increase in Tb. Sp (+ 10.53%, P = 0.390) and SMI (+ 15.17%, P = 0.124), in TBT-treated rats compared to controls, although the differences were not significant (Fig.3). In contrast, the analysis of the mid-diaphysis showed that TBT-treated rats had a smaller Ct. Ar, Th. Ar and Ps. Cf than those of their control counterparts (Fig.4; P < 0.05), but had no effects on other indexes.

Fig. 3
figure3

Effects of TBT on femoral metaphysis of rat. Representative μCT images of trabecular architecture in the distal metaphysis form control and the 50 μg·kg− 1 TBT rats (a), BV/TV (b), Conn. D (c), SMI (d), Tb. N (e), Tb. Th (f), Tb. Sp (g). Data were presented from individual rat, and the mean is indicated by a line; n = 4

Fig. 4
figure4

Effect of TBT on femoral diaphysis of rat. Representative μCT images of femoral diaphysis from control and the 50 μg·kg− 1 TBT group (a), Ct. Ar (b), Ma. Ar (c), TCS. Ar (d), Ct.th (e), Ps. Cf (f), Ec. Ct (g). Data were presented from individual rat, and the mean is indicated by a line; n = 4, *P < 0.05, compared with control

Effect of TBT on Jo

Jo was significantly reduced in 50 μg·kg− 1 TBT-treated rats, compared with control rats (P < 0.05, Fig.5).

Fig. 5
figure5

Effect of TBT on polar moment of inertia (Jo). Data are presented from individual rat, and the mean is indicated by a line; n = 4, *P < 0.05, compared with control

Effect of TBT on ash content

There was no significant difference in ash content between the TBT groups and the control group (Fig.6).

Fig. 6
figure6

Effect of TBT on femoral ash content of rat. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 5

Effect of TBT on serum Ca2+ and pi levels

As shown in Fig.7, there were no significant changes in serum levels of Ca2+ and Pi between the control and TBT treated rats.

Fig. 7
figure7

Effects of TBT on serum calcium and phosphorus of rats. Expression of serum calcium (a) and phosphorus (b) under different treatments. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 10

Discussion

Consistent with our previous result on the BMD of the femur, μCT analysis revealed that the effect of TBT was more significant on the diaphysis than on the cancellous diaphysis in the femur of rats in this study. However, the study of Watt et al. observed a reduced femoral cortical cross-sectional area and thinner cortex with increased cancellous Tb. Th, Tb. N, and BV/TV in TBT-treated mice [16]. The discrepancies between the two studies might be explained by (1) the different dose. EDs could exhibit complex dose-response curves, and they might produce different effects at extremely low concentrations [28,29,30]. The highest concentration used in our study was 200-fold lower than the dose used in the study by Watt et al.; (2) The different species and sexes. Several systematic studies have revealed that femoral morphology and composition differ in genetic variation, sex and age [31,32,33]; (3) The different exposure times. Our exposure time included puberty of rats while that of Watt et al. only included the adult stage. Notably, skeletal growth is rapid during adolescence [34], in which endochondral and intramembranous ossification are produced simultaneously, while the process of endochondral ossification disappears after puberty [35]. Hence, the effect of TBT in this study includes the effect on skeletal development, while such an effect in the study of Watt et al. [16] is only on bone remodeling. As a long bone, the femoral diaphysis is a hollow cylinder whose size and shape can be influenced by the relative amounts of bone deposition and resorption on the periosteal and endosteal surfaces [36,37,38,39]. Therefore, a significantly smaller periosteal expansion and marrow infilling might lead to a smaller Ct. Ar, Th. Ar and Ps. Cf, which reflected the relative contribution of osteoblasts and osteoclasts working on them [33]. Indeed, in vitro studies showed that TBT not only inhibited osteoblasts [40, 41] but also suppressed osteoclastogenesis and resorptive activity of osteoclasts [16, 42].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells contributing to osteoblast and adipocyte progenies in adult bone marrow [43]. As common progenitor cells of adipocytes and osteoblasts, the commitment towards these lineages is classically considered to be inversely related [44]. As a dual RXRα/β and PPARγ agonist [22], TBT could reprogram BM-MSCs towards adipogenesis at the cost of osteogenesis in vitro [40, 41] and in vivo [45]. In contrast, TBT did not obviously change the expression of PPARγ and its target genes in this study. Consistent with the response of genes involved in adipogenesis, genes associated osteogenesis (ALP, OC and Runx2) were not significantly changed in this study. Since the relative expressive fold of Angptl4 expression was marginal only in the 0.5 and 5 μg·kg− 1 TBT groups, and had no effects in the 50 μg·kg− 1 TBT group. These data revealed that the impaired effects of TBT on the mesenchymal differentiation disappeared at 85d, suggesting that TBT treatment might have no persistent effects on the adipo-osteogenic balance in the BM of rats at the transcriptional level. This no residual effects might be partly due to the resistance produced by rats to TBT. One recent paper showed that feeding young mice a high-fat diet (HFD) significantly increased the CD45CD31Sca1+CD24+ (a tri-potent population with stem cell-like characteristics) and adipogenic progenitor cells (APCs) frequencies for 1 day but not for 10 days [46]. Our recent study showed that TBT treatment resulted in a dose-dependent increase in lipid accumulation and adipocyte number in the BM of the femur [15]. In addition, our previous study demonstrated that TBT-induced functional perturbations of the gut microbiome were similar to the HFD styles [47]. Therefore, whether the effect of TBT on APC proliferation is similar to that of HFD needs to be further investigated.

The different effects of TBT between this study and in vitro studies [40, 41] were at least partially were explained by the compensation effect of rats, because experimental animals can exert feedback mechanisms to counteract harmful effects. However, one paper [45] observed up-regulated MSCs expression of genes involved in lipogenesis in all three subsequent generations after ancestral perinatal TBT exposure. Preimplantation development is a major developmental period of epigenetic reprogramming of the genome in mammalians [48]. Indeed, exposure to TBT throughout pregnancy and lactation induced genome-wide alterations in methylation and altered the expression of metabolism-relevant genes in unexposed male descendants [49]. However, genomic methylation patterns are generally stable and heritable in somatic differentiated cells [48]. Therefore, the different exposure times might be a plausible explanation for the discrepancy between that of Chamorro-García et al. [45] and ours.

Jo is a quantity used to predict an object’s ability to resist torsion. Because structures possessing the same Ct. Ar but different moments of inertia (e.g., a solid cylinder and a tube) will exhibit different mechanical characteristics in bending and torsion [50], so measuring Jo is necessary. Moreover, the level of Jo is consistent with bone strength [51]. Ct. Ar, Jo, and ash content together might explain 66–88% of the genetic variability in adult whole bone mechanical properties [21, 33]. In this study, treatment with 50 μg·kg− 1 TBT caused a significant decrease in Ct. Ar and Jo, but not on ash content, which might be one possible explanation for the reduced but no significantly different biomechanical strength change induced by TBT in our previous study [15].

The skeleton is made of collagen fibers that form a scaffold where mineralization is initiated by the accumulation of Ca2+ and Pi, mainly in the form of crystalline hydroxyapatite (HA) [52]. Calcium and phosphorus play critical roles in diverse biological processes including bone mineralization [53, 54]. TBT treatment resulted in no significant changes in the serum Ca2+ and Pi levels in this study, which was in accordance with the data of ash content.

Conclusions

In conclusion, treatment with 50 μg·kg− 1 TBT caused a significant decrease in femoral Ct. Ar, Th. Ar and Jo of rat. All the data suggest that exposure to a low dose of TBT from the prepubertal to adult stage produces adverse effects on skeletal architecture and strength.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

APCs:

Adipogenic progenitor cells

BM:

Bone marrow

BMD:

Bone mineral density

BV/TV:

Bone volume fraction

Ca2+ :

Calcium ion

Conn.D:

Connectivity density

Ct.Ar:

Cortical cross sectional area

Ct.th:

Cortical thickness

Ec.Cf:

Endocortical circumference

EDs:

Endocrine disruptor

HA:

Hydroxyapatite

IAP:

Antero-posterior axes

IML:

Medio-lateral axes

Ma.Ar:

Marrow area

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

OC:

Osteocalcin

Ps.Cf:

Periosteal circumference

Pi:

Phosphate

PPARγ:

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ

SMI:

Structural model index

Tb.N:

Trabecular number

Tb.Th:

Trabecular thickness

TBT:

Tributyltin chloride

Tb.Sp:

Trabecular separation

TCS.Ar:

Total cross sectional area

μCT:

Micro-computed tomography

References

  1. 1.

    Rachner TD, Khosla S, Hofbauer LC. Osteoporosis: now and the future. Lancet. 2011;377(9773):1276–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62349-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Porter JL, Varacallo M: Osteoporosis. [Updated 2020 Nov 21] In: StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan- Available from: https://www.ncbinlmnihgov/books/NBK441901/2020.

  3. 3.

    Berry SD, Kiel DP, Colón-Emeric C. Hip fractures in older adults in 2019. Jama. 2019;321(22):2231–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.5453.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Seeman E. Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men. Lancet. 2002;359(9320):1841–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08706-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Prada D, López G, Solleiro-Villavicencio H, Garcia-Cuellar C, Baccarelli AA. Molecular and cellular mechanisms linking air pollution and bone damage. Environ Res. 2020;185(109465):109465.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Toni R, Di Conza G, Barbaro F, Zini N, Consolini E, Dallatana D, et al. Microtopography of immune cells in osteoporosis and bone lesions by endocrine disruptors. Front Immunol. 2020;11(1737):1737.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    van Zwol-Janssens C, Trasande L, Asimakopoulos AG, Martinez-Moral MP, Kannan K, Philips EM, et al. Fetal exposure to bisphenols and phthalates and childhood bone mass: a population-based prospective cohort study. Environ Res. 2020;186(109602):109602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yang Z, Shi J, Guo Z, Chen M, Wang C, He C, et al. A pilot study on polycystic ovarian syndrome caused by neonatal exposure to tributyltin and bisphenol a in rats. Chemosphere. 2019;231:151–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.129.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Antizar-Ladislao B. Environmental levels, toxicity and human exposure to tributyltin (TBT)-contaminated marine environment. Environ Int. 2008;34(2):292–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.09.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mattos Y, Stotz WB, Romero MS, Bravo M, Fillmann G, Castro IB. Butyltin contamination in northern Chilean coast: is there a potential risk for consumers? Sci Total Environ. 2017;595:209–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.264.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Takahashi S, Mukai H, Tanabe S, Sakayama K, Miyazaki T, Masuno H. Butyltin residues in livers of humans and wild terrestrial mammals and in plastic products. Environ Pollut. 1999;106(2):213–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00068-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kannan K, Senthilkumar K, Giesy JP. Occurence of butyltin compounds in human blood. Environ Sci Technol. 1999;33:1776–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Adeeko A, Li D, Forsyth DS, Casey V, Cooke GM, Barthelemy J, et al. Effects of in utero tributyltin chloride exposure in the rat on pregnancy outcome. Toxicol Sci. 2003;74(2):407–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfg131.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tsukamoto Y, Ishihara Y, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Hagiwara H. Inhibition of ossification in vivo and differentiation of osteoblasts in vitro by tributyltin. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68(4):739–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2004.04.020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yao W, Wei X, Guo H, Cheng D, Li H, Sun L, et al. Tributyltin reduces bone mineral density by reprograming bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rat. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;73(103271):103271.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Watt J, Baker AH, Meeks B, Pajevic PD, Morgan EF, Gerstenfeld LC, et al. Tributyltin induces distinct effects on cortical and trabecular bone in female C57Bl/6J mice. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(9):7007–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26495.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Resgala LCR, Santana HS, Portela BSM, Zanovello MVS, da Costa CS, Niño OMS, et al. Effects of Tributyltin (TBT) on rat bone and mineral metabolism. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2019;52(5):1166–77. https://doi.org/10.33594/000000079.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bass S, Delmas PD, Pearce G, Hendrich E, Tabensky A, Seeman E. The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(6):795–804. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI7060.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vos JG, De Klerk A, Krajnc EI, Van Loveren H, Rozing J. Immunotoxicity of bis (tri-n-butyltin) oxide in the rat: effects on thymus-dependent immunity and on nonspecific resistance following long-term exposure in young versus aged rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1990;105(1):144–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-008x(90)90366-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jepsen KJ, Akkus OJ, Majeska RJ, Nadeau JH. Hierarchical relationship between bone traits and mechanical properties in inbred mice. Mamm Genome. 2003;14(2):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-002-3045-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kanayama T, Kobayashi N, Mamiya S, Nakanishi T, Nishikawa J. Organotin compounds promote adipocyte differentiation as agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma/retinoid X receptor pathway. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67(3):766–74. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.104.008409.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Burris TP, Pelton PD, Zhou L, Osborne MC, Cryan E, Demarest KT. A novel method for analysis of nuclear receptor function at natural promoters: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist actions on aP2 gene expression detected using branched DNA messenger RNA quantitation. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13(3):410–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/mend.13.3.0246.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yoon JC, Chickering TW, Rosen ED, Dussault B, Qin Y, Soukas A, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma target gene encoding a novel angiopoietin-related protein associated with adipose differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(14):5343–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.20.14.5343-5349.2000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Beier EE, Maher JR, Sheu TJ, Cory-Slechta DA, Berger AJ, Zuscik MJ, et al. Heavy metal lead exposure, osteoporotic-like phenotype in an animal model, and depression of Wnt signaling. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(1):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205374.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kawane T, Qin X, Jiang Q, Miyazaki T, Komori H, Yoshida CA, et al. Runx2 is required for the proliferation of osteoblast progenitors and induces proliferation by regulating Fgfr2 and Fgfr3. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31853-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, Barone LM, Wilming L, Tassinari MS, et al. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol. 1990;143(3):420–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041430304.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kaiser J. Hormesis. Sipping from a poisoned chalice. Science. 2003;302(5644):376–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.302.5644.376.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, Heindel JJ, Jacobs DR Jr, Lee DH, et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(3):378–455. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2011-1050.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, et al. EDC-2: the Endocrine Society's second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E1–E150. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2015-1010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Glatt V, Canalis E, Stadmeyer L, Bouxsein ML. Age-related changes in trabecular architecture differ in female and male C57BL/6J mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(8):1197–207. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.070507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Halloran BP, Ferguson VL, Simske SJ, Burghardt A, Venton LL, Majumdar S. Changes in bone structure and mass with advancing age in the male C57BL/6J mouse. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(6):1044–50. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.6.1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Price C, Herman BC, Lufkin T, Goldman HM, Jepsen KJ. Genetic variation in bone growth patterns defines adult mouse bone fragility. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(11):1983–91. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.050707.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Braun JM. Early-life exposure to EDCs: role in childhood obesity and neurodevelopment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(3):161–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.186.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ballabriga A. Morphological and physiological changes during growth: an update. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(Suppl 1):S1–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    van der Meulen MC, Beaupré GS, Carter DR. Mechanobiologic influences in long bone cross-sectional growth. Bone. 1993;14(4):635–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90085-o.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Seeman E. From density to structure: growing up and growing old on the surfaces of bone. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(4):509–21. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.4.509.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Duan Y, Beck TJ, Wang XF, Seeman E. Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(10):1766–74. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.10.1766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sontag W. Quantitative measurement of periosteal and cortical-endosteal bone formation and resorption in the midshaft of female rat femur. Bone. 1986;7(1):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(86)90152-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yanik SC, Baker AH, Mann KK, Schlezinger JJ. Organotins are potent activators of PPARgamma and adipocyte differentiation in bone marrow multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Toxicol Sci. 2011;122(2):476–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfr140.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Baker AH, Watt J, Huang CK, Gerstenfeld LC, Schlezinger JJ. Tributyltin engages multiple nuclear receptor pathways and suppresses osteogenesis in bone marrow multipotent stromal cells. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28(6):1156–66. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx500433r.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yonezawa T, Hasegawa S, Ahn JY, Cha BY, Teruya T, Hagiwara H, et al. Tributyltin and triphenyltin inhibit osteoclast differentiation through a retinoic acid receptor-dependent signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;355(1):10–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.237.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chen Q, Shou P, Zheng C, Jiang M, Cao G, Yang Q, et al. Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: adipocytes or osteoblasts? Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(7):1128–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.168.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kawai M, Rosen CJ. PPARγ: a circadian transcription factor in adipogenesis and osteogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6(11):629–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.155.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chamorro-Garcia R, Sahu M, Abbey RJ, Laude J, Pham N, Blumberg B. Transgenerational inheritance of increased fat depot size, stem cell reprogramming, and hepatic steatosis elicited by prenatal exposure to the obesogen tributyltin in mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(3):359–66. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205701.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ambrosi TH, Scialdone A, Graja A, Gohlke S, Jank AM, Bocian C, et al. Adipocyte accumulation in the bone marrow during obesity and aging impairs stem cell-based hematopoietic and bone regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(6):771–84 e776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.02.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Guo H, Yan H, Cheng D, Wei X, Kou R, Si J. Tributyltin exposure induces gut microbiome dysbiosis with increased body weight gain and dyslipidemia in mice. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;60:202–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2018.04.020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science. 2001;293(5532):1089–93. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063443.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chamorro-Garcia R, Diaz-Castillo C, Shoucri BM, Käch H, Leavitt R, Shioda T, et al. Ancestral perinatal obesogen exposure results in a transgenerational thrifty phenotype in mice. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01944-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    van der Meulen MC, Jepsen KJ, Mikić B. Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything. Bone. 2001;29(2):101–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00491-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wergedal JE, Veskovic K, Hellan M, Nyght C, Balemans W, Libanati C, et al. Patients with Van Buchem disease, an osteosclerotic genetic disease, have elevated bone formation markers, higher bone density, and greater derived polar moment of inertia than normal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(12):5778–83. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030201.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Anderson HC. Mechanism of mineral formation in bone. Lab Investig. 1989;60(3):320–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Peacock M. Calcium metabolism in health and disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(Suppl 1):S23–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Berndt T, Kumar R. Novel mechanisms in the regulation of phosphorus homeostasis. Physiology (Bethesda). 2009;24:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00034.2008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the grants from the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2020MH332).

A statement for the methods

All methods in the study were carried out in accordance with the NIH Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and followed the principles in the “Use of Animals in Toxicology” (ARENA/OLAW 2002).

A statement for guidelines

Authors declare that the study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Funding

Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2020MH332).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MJL: Methodology, software and writing- original draft. DC: Methodology and project administration. HL: Methodology. WHY: Methodology and data curation. DMG: Methodology. SEW: Methodology. JLS: Conceptualization, project administration and writing - review & editing. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiliang Si.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All treatments of rats in our research were done humanely in accordance with the National Institutes of Health’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and followed the principles described in the “Use of Animals in Toxicology,” which were approved by the Ethics Committees of the School of Public Health, Shandong University, in March 2019. The identification code was 20190204.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Cheng, D., Li, H. et al. Tributyltin perturbs femoral cortical architecture and polar moment of inertia in rat. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04298-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tributyltin
  • Adipogenesis
  • Osteogenesis
  • Bone geometry
  • Micro-computed tomography
  • Polar moment of inertia