Skip to main content

Incidence and risk factors for poor ankle functional recovery, and the development and progression of posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis after significant ankle ligament injury (SALI): the SALI cohort study protocol

Abstract

Background

Ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries, accounting for up to 5% of all Emergency Department visits in the United Kingdom. Ankle injury may be associated with future ankle osteoarthritis. Up to 70% of ankle osteoarthritis cases may be associated with previous ankle injury. There is limited research regarding the association between ankle sprain and ankle osteoarthritis development. The current study aims to phenotype those who suffer significant ankle ligament injuries, identify potential risk factors for ankle injuries and subsequent poor recovery, examine why individuals may develop osteoarthritis, and what factors influence this chance.

Methods

In this multicentre cohort study participants were recruited from nine Emergency Departments and two Urgent Care Centres in the United Kingdom. Participants (aged 18–70 years old) were defined as those who had suffered an isolated acute ankle sprain, which was Ottawa Ankle Rules positive, but negative for a significant ankle fracture on x-ray. Age and sex matched controls were also recruited. The controls were individuals who had not suffered a significant ankle injury, including ankle pain, function affected for more than 7 days, or the ankle caused them to report to an Emergency Department. Data is collected through a series of seven questionnaires (at baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years later). The questionnaires include four sections (demographic questions; index injury, and injury history questions; functional assessment questions; and quality of life questions) and are designed to collect detailed information about the individual, their injury, potential risk factors for ankle sprains and ankle osteoarthritis, plus their medical history and any medication consumed.

Discussion

The Significant Ankle Ligament Injury (SALI) study aims to add to the limited knowledge regarding which factors can predict ankle sprains, complaints, and osteoarthritis. This is important because despite ankle sprains being regarded as a benign injury that resolves quickly, residual symptoms are not uncommon months and years after the injury.

Peer Review reports

Background

Ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. This is emphasised by research, worldwide, stating the high prevalence of ankle sprains [8,9,10,11,12]. Ankle sprains account for up to 5% of all Emergency Department visits in the UK annually, which is approximately 5600 injuries per day [4, 8, 13,14,15,16].

Ankle sprains are also the most common type of ankle injury in many sports [14, 17,18,19,20,21], with about half of all reported ankle sprain injuries occurring during sports [12, 22, 23]. This has been stated to be about 15% of the total number of sporting injuries [9] and emphasises that ankle sprains are one of the most common injuries to occur during sport and physical activity, both recreationally and competitively [20, 24,25,26,27]. This is particularly evident in sports where participants frequently jump and land on 1 foot, make sharp cutting manoeuvres, or make contact with either a teammate or opponent, such as basketball [28, 29], volleyball [30], field hockey [31], handball [32], football [33], and figure skating [34] where ankle sprains have been reported as a predominant injury. Importantly the risk of sustaining an ankle sprain is different for differing sports [2, 17, 19].

Despite the high prevalence of ankle sprains, they are often regarded as a benign and self-limiting injury, which will resolve quickly with limited treatment and respond well to conservative management [8, 14, 28, 35,36,37]. However, studies have shown that residual symptoms are not uncommon months and even years after the injury [14, 28, 38, 39].

Approximately, one third of patients report residual complaints after treatment, such as pain, re-sprain, swelling, muscular weakness, plus loss of function or feelings of instability [2, 6, 9, 16, 19, 22, 23, 40,41,42]. In studies where patients visited their GP after lateral ankle sprain, 47.5% of the patients experienced persistent complaints and only 17.5% regarded themselves as completely recovered [9, 11, 43]. Around 33% of patients experience pain 1 year after spraining an ankle [22, 42], and 50% of patients who suffer an ankle sprain experience pain 4 years after suffering the sprain [44]. Similarly, studies with a long-term follow-up, ranging from 5 to 7 years, reported chronic complaints in 20–39% of the patients [22, 45, 46]. In addition to persistent complaints, individuals also have an increased risk of recurrent ankle sprain [9, 41, 47], for example Kreitner, et al. [48] found that up to 34% of patients report at least one re-sprain within 3 years of the initial sprain.

The residual complaints have been linked to both functional and mechanical impairments [49, 50]. These impairments may contribute to long-term restrictions and limitations in occupational and recreational activities, which can produce an increased likelihood of individual’s physical activity decreasing [51, 52], and consequently negatively affects health related quality of life [46, 49, 53]. Consequently, ankle sprain injuries could represent a significant public health problem and a major health care burden [46, 54]. All of which could be due to injuries from sport, exercise, and recreation, such as an ankle sprain, being a leading cause of cessation of regular physical activity [55,56,57]. Thus, due to ankle sprains being a common injury [18, 56], with a high percentage of disability occurring after the initial injury, it is an injury which may play a significant role in reducing an individual’s physical activity [46, 56].

The occurrence of ankle sprains does not only have a physical impact for patients but also impacts society, through high social economic costs, and financial burden [8, 22, 41]. Both of which are associated with diagnosis, treatment, and loss of work productivity contingent with the severity of the injury [1, 3, 8]. This is shown by a quarter of individuals who sustain ankle sprain injuries being unable to attend work or school for 7 days following the initial injury [4, 8, 58]. The financial impact is also emphasised by the medical cost of one ankle sprain, including the healthcare and time off work, costing in the range of £940 to £1314, which is £1–2 billion annually [59, 60]. However, this figure only accounts for individuals who have sought help from a hospital emergency department and not those who have self-managed or received other forms of care [59, 60].

Ankle sprains have also been stated as a leading cause of post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis [2, 8, 61,62,63,64]. Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis and one of the leading causes of pain and disability [14, 65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. Most research has been conducted on the hip and knee, where post-traumatic osteoarthritis accounts for 8 and 12% of cases, respectively [75, 76]. In contrast up to 70% of ankle osteoarthritis cases may be associated with previous ankle injuries [76], however ankle osteoarthritis is poorly understood. The cause of osteoarthritis remains somewhat unknown, but a number of risk factors (mainly for knee and hip osteoarthritis) have been identified, including joint injury, muscle weakness, mechanical stress or loading of the joints [77,78,79,80]. It is possible that these risk factors play a role in ankle osteoarthritis however the degree to which is still unknown.

Sex and hormonal factors have also been identified as risk factors for osteoarthritis development, and so alongside a higher rate of ankle sprains [8, 81, 82] females have been found to be more susceptible than males in developing ankle osteoarthritis [77, 79, 80]. Females susceptibility to both ankle sprains and ankle osteoarthritis could be due to the anatomical [83,84,85], hormonal [84, 86, 87], and neuromuscular differences [86, 88, 89] which exists between sexes. However, these differences may not necessarily explain the differences in incidence rates of ankle sprains, and thus suggests that future research is needed to examine whether differences between sexes are related to anatomical or physiological differences, or if differences are activity specific and thus related to training behaviours [8].

Age has also been identified as a risk factor for both ankle sprains and osteoarthritis, with the incidence of ankle sprains being found to be higher in younger people [8, 10, 43], while the prevalence of osteoarthritis increases with age [90, 91]. Osteoarthritis is not a normal part of the ageing process. Association may be a consequence of collective exposure to various risk factors, physiological changes, and vulnerabilities which occur as part of aging, thus making the joint susceptible to osteoarthritis [69, 92]. This can include a loss of strength, increased reaction time, poor proprioception, oxidative damage, and cartilage thinning [69, 92].

There is limited longitudinal research regarding ankle osteoarthritis in general, and in particular after trauma [14, 41]. Additionally, factors which can predict persistent ankle complaints are relatively unknown [22], all of which highlights the need for further research to examine these factors. The following is a methodological description of the significant ankle ligament injury (SALI) cohort study, which aims to phenotype those who suffer significant ankle ligament injuries, identify potential risk factors for ankle injuries, examine why individuals may develop osteoarthritis, and what factors influence this chance.

Objectives

  1. 1)

    To identify the prevalence of persistent ankle pain and dysfunction at discrete timepoints following presentation to the Emergency Department for a significant ankle ligament injury.

  2. 2)

    To determine the individual risk factors for poor patient reported outcomes measures (e.g. pain and persistent dysfunction) following significant ankle ligament injury.

  3. 3)

    To identify the prevalence and risk factors for development of ankle osteoarthritis, post significant ankle ligament injury.

Methodology

This study is a longitudinal prospective cohort study that obtains questionnaire data from adults aged 18 to 70 who suffer a significant ankle ligament injury. Participants are recruited following attendance at an Emergency Department for their ankle injury. The study collects data at seven time points; at time of the injury, then 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years after injury (Fig. 1). Further nested studies will be considered dependant on ethical review and funding.

Fig. 1
figure1

A schematic of the time points which SALI participants are followed up with questionnaires. Abbreviations: SALI; Significant Ankle Ligament Injury, ED: Emergency Department

Ethics

All aspects of this study were approved by the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee (NREC reference: 15/EM/0384), and the Research & Innovation department of Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (study sponsor).

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Eligible patients were aged between 18 and 70 years old at the time of seeking medical attention for an isolated acute (within 2 weeks) ankle sprain. Patients were also required to be Ottawa Ankle Rules positive, but negative for a significant ankle fracture on an x-ray. Ottawa Ankle Rules positive is when an individual reports pain in the malleolar zone and any of the following; bone tenderness at the posterior edge (6 cm) or tip of the lateral malleolus; or bone tenderness at the posterior edge (6 cm) or tip of the medial malleolus; or an inability to bear weight immediately and in the Emergency Department for four steps [7, 93]. Individuals who suffered a flake (avulsion) fracture were also included, due to flake fractures being able to be treated as soft-tissue injuries, as reported in other studies [15, 16]. Eligibility was assessed by the clinical team in each Emergency Department, or the study team following thorough training.

Exclusion

Patients aged under 18 and over 70 were excluded, in addition to those with injuries 2 weeks old or greater and significant ankle fracture (with the exception of flake fractures [4, 15, 16]), as reported by x-ray [94]. Patients with other significant joint injuries, including additional lower leg injury, and bilateral ankle injury, were excluded [6, 16]. Individuals were also excluded if they were not independently living or could not read English, like the study Matthews, et al. [95] conducted.

Recruitment

This multi-centre study recruited participants from nine Emergency Departments and two Urgent Care Centres in the United Kingdom. The recruitment sites were; Nottingham University Hospital Queens Medical Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds St James University Hospital, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University Hospital Coventry, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Warwick Hospital, King’s Mill Hospital, and Royal Derby Hospital. In addition to two Urgent Care Centres; Nottingham Urgent Care Centre and St Cross, Rugby. Eligible patients were identified and first approached by Emergency Department clinical staff in one of two ways:

Phase one

Face-to-face contact by Emergency Department clinicians (Emergency Nurse Practitioners, Advanced Nurse Practitioners, Initial Assessment Team, Emergency Department Physiotherapists, or doctors).

Phase two

Retrospective identification using medical records within 2 weeks of the patient’s first contact with the Emergency Department.

Phase one

Ankle injury patients were given an introductory SALI study Patient Information Sheet before their x-ray. If their x-ray was negative, the patient was given more information about the study while they were in the Emergency Department by the clinical team. If interested, the research team explained the study in detail, giving opportunity to ask questions. Informed consent was received from the patients. Once enrolled participants were given a unique SALI ID number, SALI cohort study covering letter, a questionnaire (baseline), and a pre-paid business envelope for them to return the questionnaire in. Alternatively, participants could also receive an email link to the questionnaire.

Interested participants that were unable to stay to speak with the research team provided their name, postal and email addresses, and contact telephone number for telephone follow-up by the research team. Their hospital identifier number was noted (NHS number or site specific) by the clinician. For patients that declined participation their hospital identifier number only was recorded (to avoid contacting these patients following retrospective phase two screening).

Phase two

Patients that attended the Emergency Department with an ankle injury in the previous week were retrospectively screened by the clinical team. Eligible patients (that were not approached by phase one recruitment) were posted a letter of introduction, participant information sheet, informed consent form, contact details form and prepaid return envelope. Two weeks following the initial postal contact patients was followed up by telephone, having had time to consider if they wish to take part in the study. Consenting participants were enrolled in the study and sent the baseline questionnaire, either by post, with a pre-paid reply envelope, or by email, depending on their preference.

Recruitment was also aided through the use of posters in the Emergency Departments. These posters provided brief study details, and the research team contact details.

Control participants

Age and sex matched controls from the general population were also recruited. The control participants were any individual who had not suffered a significant ankle injury (e.g. one that caused ankle pain and poor function for more than 7 days) and caused them to report to an Emergency Department. The control participants were recruited through posters and leaflets in hospital Emergency Departments and around the University of Nottingham.

Sample size

A sample size calculation was conducted, based on a 6 month pilot study at Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham. This recorded 2723 ankle sprain patients reporting to Emergency Department, 1760 of which were Ottawa Ankle Rules positive, but negative for a significant ankle fracture on an x-ray. Thus, we estimated ~ 7000 ankle sprain patients, which were Ottawa Ankle Rules positive, but negative for a significant ankles fracture on x-ray, would report to Queens Medical Centre Emergency Department in a 24 month period, with ~ 4600 being aged between 18 and 70, thus eligible for the study. Consequently, based on a recruitment rate of about 40%, and the Emergency Departments varying in size between the study’s recruitment sites we aim to recruit 3000 participants.

Duration of the study

Recruitment began in October 2016 for a period of 39 months, with the last patient recruited in January 2020. The recruited participants are followed up for a period of 15 years, with questionnaires sent serially (Fig. 1). Due to the study being a 15 year cohort study the recruitment is not currently completed for all time points, thus the overall recruitment is still ongoing.

Questionnaires

Consenting participants complete a questionnaire at each data collection time point (Fig. 1). Questionnaires differ slightly at each time point (Table 1). If a participant does not respond to a questionnaire, they are sent up to three reminders, at around 2, 4, and 6 weeks after the questionnaire was sent. Reminders consist of a telephone call, email, or postal reminder. The questionnaires include four sections; demographics; index injury and injury history; functional assessments; and quality of life (see Additional file 1). The questionnaires collect detailed information about the individual and their injury, potential risk factors for ankle sprains and ankle osteoarthritis, in addition to comorbidities and medication consumed. A pilot baseline questionnaire was completed by volunteers before the start of the study, to assess content, language and length. Patient and public involvement was coordinated through the Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis and Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust.

Table 1 Data recorded at each questionnaire timepoint

The demographic section records age, and sex, plus height and body mass (which is also used to calculate body mass index). This section also records known risk factors for osteoarthritis, namely knee alignment, Heberden’s nodes, and the relationship between index to ring finger (2D:4D ratio) [96]. Participants self-report these measures using validated line drawings [97, 98].

The injury section records information relating to the current ankle injury, such as which ankle was injured, the cause of the injury, and footwear worn at the time of injury. Participants are also asked to report their current level of ankle pain and pain at the time of the injury (between 0 and 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = maximum pain). Previous ankle injuries and other significant injuries are also recorded.

The functional assessment questions includes the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, which is a validated 42 item questionnaire that assesses ankle function in five sections; pain, other symptoms (e.g. swelling, stiffness, and range of motion), activities of daily living, sport and recreational activities, and foot and ankle related quality of life [99]. In the baseline questionnaire participants are asked to record their ankle function a week before their injury (to provide a ‘normal’ picture of their ankle pre-injury).

The final section explores quality of life. Questions document type, frequency and intensity of physical activity and exercise, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular medication, as well as including an EQ-5D-5L health questionnaire [100].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis will be conducted in SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25) using descriptive statistics (mean (standard deviation)) for continuous variables, and number (percentage) for categorical variables. Variables will be considered significant if p values are 0.05 or below, using 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion

We have described the protocol of a large UK cohort study aiming to phenotype those who suffer significant ankle sprains and identify potential risk factors for poor recovery. The study design also allows examination of risk factors for ankle osteoarthritis development following a significant ankle ligament injury. These are important questions as there is limited research regarding which factors are associated with suffering a significant ankle sprain (requiring x-ray), persistent complaints, and ankle osteoarthritis development [14, 22, 41]. Ankle sprains are often regarded as benign injuries which resolve quickly [8, 14, 28, 35,36,37], however, residual symptoms are not uncommon months and even years after the injury [14, 28, 38, 39].

Despite ankle osteoarthritis only accounting for 4% of all osteoarthritis cases, compared to 41% being the knee and 19% being the hip [14, 101], a large percentage of ankle osteoarthritis, 78%, is post-traumatic, compared to 9% of primary osteoarthritis [102], which is much higher than other joints [14, 76, 102, 103].

The current study questionnaire collects data on both age and sex, both of which have been suggested to be risk factors for both ankle sprains and osteoarthritis, with females being at higher risk for ankle sprains [8, 81, 82] and osteoarthritis [77, 79, 80], while the incident rates of ankle sprains are higher in young people [8, 10, 43], and the prevalence of osteoarthritis increases with age [90, 91]. The study also collects data on individual’s height and body mass, both of which have been identified as potential risk factors for ankle sprains [104, 105]. The questionnaires also includes questions regarding Heberden’s nodes, as a clinical sign of primary osteoarthritis, plus suggest a genetic predisposition to the development of osteoarthritis in several joints [106, 107].

We also examine the relationship between index to ring finger (2D:4D ratio) due to suggestions that when the index finger is shorter than the ring finger, “type 3”, being associated with knee osteoarthritis [98]. The relevance of the 2D:4D ratio and the risk of ankle osteoarthritis development is not yet known but will be explored in this study. The current study also records data on what footwear was worn at the time of injury, this is important as footwear influences the incidence of ankle injuries during sport [108] and non-sporting occasions [109].

The questionnaires also include questions regarding individual’s smoking status and alcohol consumption. The inclusion of questions regarding tobacco smoking is due to it being shown to be associated with increased musculoskeletal and overuse injury rates compared to non-smokers [110]. Plus, despite successfully stopping smoking, ex-smokers still maintained a higher injury risk in comparison to non-smokers [110]. Similarly, alcohol consumption has also been suggested to be a risk factor for musculoskeletal pain and injury [111, 112].

The study aims to disseminate the results of this study through publications in relevant peer-reviews journals and conference proceedings.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the current study uses a series of questionnaires and aims to phenotype those who suffer significant ankle ligament injuries, identify risk factors for suffering a significant ankle ligament injury, plus examine why individuals may develop ankle osteoarthritis and what factors influence this chance. All of which is important as there is limited research regarding ankle sprains and ankle osteoarthritis, despite ankle sprains being a common injury.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

SALI:

significant ankle ligament injury

2D:4D ratio:

relationship between index to ring finger

ED:

Emergency Department

References

  1. 1.

    Gribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, Docherty CL, Fourchet F, Fong DT-P, et al. Evidence review for the 2016 international ankle consortium consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(24):1496–505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Herzog MM, Kerr ZY, Marshall SW, Wikstrom EA. Epidemiology of ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):603–10. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-447-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Delahunt E, Remus A. Risk factors for lateral ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):611–6. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44-18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bleakley CM, O’Connor SR, Tully MA, Rocke LG, MacAuley DC, Bradbury I, et al. Effect of accelerated rehabilitation on function after ankle sprain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:1964–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Al Bimani SA, Gates LS, Warner M, Ewings S, Crouch R, Bowen C. Characteristics of patients with ankle sprain presenting to an emergency department in the south of England (UK): a seven-month review. Int Emerg Nurs. 2018;41:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2018.05.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bleakley CM, O'Connor S, Tully MA, Rocke LG, MacAuley DC, McDonough SM. The PRICE study (protection rest ice compression elevation): design of a randomised controlled trial comparing standard versus cryokinetic ice applications in the management of acute ankle sprain [ISRCTN13903946]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-125.

  7. 7.

    Auleley G-R, Kerboull L, Durieux P, Cosquer M, Courpied J-P, Ravaud P. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: a study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32(1):14–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70093-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014;44(1):123–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mailuhu AK, Verhagen EA, van Ochten JM, Bindels PJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Middelkoop M. The trAPP-study: cost-effectiveness of an unsupervised e-health supported neuromuscular training program for the treatment of acute ankle sprains in general practice: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):78–86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0539-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bridgman S, Clement D, Downing A, Walley G, Phair I, Maffulli N. Population based epidemiology of ankle sprains attending accident and emergency units in the west midlands of England, and a survey of UK practice for severe ankle sprains. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(6):508–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.6.508.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hølmer P, Søndergaard L, Konradsen L, Nielsen PT, Jørgensen LN. Epidemiology of sprains in the lateral ankle and foot. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(2):72–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Waterman BR, Owens BD, Davey S, Zacchilli MA, Belmont PJ Jr. The epidemiology of ankle sprains in the United States. JBJS. 2010;92(13):2279–84. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cooke M, Lamb S, Marsh J, Dale J. A survey of current consultant practice of treatment of severe ankle sprains in emergency departments in the United Kingdom. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(6):505–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.6.505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Palmer-Green DS, Batt ME, Scammell BE. Simple advice for a simple ankle sprain? The not so benign ankle injury. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(6):947–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.12.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lamb S, Marsh J, Hutton J, Nakash R, Cooke M, Trial CAS. Mechanical supports for acute, severe ankle sprain: a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9663):575–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60206-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lamb S, Nakash R, Withers E, Clark M, Marsh J, Wilson S, et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of mechanical support for severe ankle sprains: design of a randomised controlled trial in the emergency department [ISRCTN 37807450]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fong DT-P, Hong Y, Chan L-K, Yung PS-H, Chan K-M. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med. 2007;37(1):73–94. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200737010-00006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007;42(2):311–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yeung M, Chan K-M, So C, Yuan W. An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain. Br J Sports Med. 1994;28(2):112–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.28.2.112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tassignon B, Verschueren J, Delahunt E, Smith M, Vicenzino B, Verhagen E, et al. Criteria-based return to sport decision-making following lateral ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Sports Med. 2019;49(4):601–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01071-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Janssen KW, van Mechelen W, Verhagen EA. Bracing superior to neuromuscular training for the prevention of self-reported recurrent ankle sprains: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(16):1235–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092947.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mailuhu AK, Oei EH, van Putte-Katier N, van Ochten JM, Bindels PJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors for persistent complaints five years after a lateral ankle sprain: a long-term follow-up study in primary care. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(3):250–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    van Ochten JM, de Vries AD, van Putte N, Oei EH, Bindels PJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. Association between patient history and physical examination and osteoarthritis after ankle sprain. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(9):717–24. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-109554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Abassi M, Bleakley C, Whiteley R. Athletes at late stage rehabilitation have persisting deficits in plantar-and dorsiflexion, and inversion (but not eversion) after ankle sprain. Phys Ther Sport. 2019;38:30–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.04.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Barker HB, Beynnon BD, Renström PA. Ankle injury risk factors in sports. Sports Med. 1997;23(2):69–74. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199723020-00001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bellows R, Wong CK. The effect of bracing and balance training on ankle sprain incidence among athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Sports P Ther. 2018;13(3):379–88. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20180379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Branche CM, Gilchrist J, Goodman RA, Weitman EA. The prevention of ankle sprains in sports. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(6):753–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465990270061201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Anandacoomarasamy A, Barnsley L. Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(3):14–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Trevino SG, Davis P, Hecht PJ. Management of acute and chronic lateral ligament injuries of the ankle. Orthoped Clin North America. 1994;25(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31862-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bahr R, Bahr I. Incidence of acute volleyball injuries: a prospective cohort study of injury mechanisms and risk factors. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1997;7(3):166–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1997.tb00134.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Murtaugh K. Injury patterns among female field hockey players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(2):201–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200102000-00005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nielsen A, Yde J. An epidemiologic and traumatologic study of injuries in handball. Int J Sports Med. 1988;9(05):341–4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1025037.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ekstrand J, Tropp H. The incidence of ankle sprains in soccer. Foot Ankle. 1990;11(1):41–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079001100108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dubravcic-Simunjak S, Pecina M, Kuipers H, Moran J, Haspl M. The incidence of injuries in elite junior figure skaters. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):511–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465030310040601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Birrer RB, Fani-Salek MH, Totten VY, Herman LM, Politi V. Managing ankle injuries in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1999;17(4):651–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(99)00060-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Braun BL. Effects of ankle sprain in a general clinic population 6 to 18 months after medical evaluation. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(2):143–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.8.2.143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wilkerson GB, Horn-Kingery HM. Treatment of the inversion ankle sprain: comparison of different modes of compression and cryotherapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;17(5):240–6. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1993.17.5.240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Doherty C, Bleakley C, Hertel J, Caulfield B, Ryan J, Delahunt E. Recovery from a first-time lateral ankle sprain and the predictors of chronic ankle instability: a prospective cohort analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(4):995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516628870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wikstrom EA, Mueller C, Cain MS. Lack of consensus on return-to-sport criteria following lateral ankle sprain: a systematic review of expert opinions. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;1(aop):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kannus P, Renstrom P. Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(2):305–12. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173020-00021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    van Putte-Katier N, van Ochten JM, van Middelkoop M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Oei EH. Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities after lateral ankle trauma in injured and contralateral ankles. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(12):2586–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.09.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    van Rijn RM, Van Os AG, Bernsen RM, Luijsterburg PA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. What is the clinical course of acute ankle sprains? A systematic literature review. Am J Med. 2008;121(4):324–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.11.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    van Ochten JM, Mos MC, van Putte-Katier N, Oei EH, Bindels PJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. Structural abnormalities and persistent complaints after an ankle sprain are not associated: an observational case control study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(626):e545–53. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X681349.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kemler E, Thijs KM, Badenbroek I, van de Port IG, Hoes AW, Backx FJ. Long-term prognosis of acute lateral ankle ligamentous sprains: high incidence of recurrences and residual symptoms. Fam Pract. 2016;33(6):596–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Konradsen L, Bech L, Ehrenbjerg M, Nickelsen T. Seven years follow-up after ankle inversion trauma. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2002;12(3):129–35. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.02104.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Verhagen R, De Keizer G, Van Dijk C. Long-term follow-up of inversion trauma of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1995;114(2):92–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422833.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Akbari M, Karimi H, Farahini H, Faghihzadeh S. Balance problems after unilateral lateral ankle sprains. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(7):819–24. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2006.01.0001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kreitner K-F, Ferber A, Grebe P, Runkel M, Berger S, Thelen M. Injuries of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle: assessment with MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(3):519–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Houston MN, Van Lunen BL, Hoch MC. Health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2014;49(6):758–63. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hertel J. Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):364–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bahr R, Lian Ø, Bahr I. A twofold reduction in the incidence of acute ankle sprains in volleyball after the introduction of an injury prevention program: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1997;7(3):172–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1997.tb00135.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    McKeon JMM, Bush HM, Reed A, Whittington A, Uhl TL, McKeon PO. Return-to-play probabilities following new versus recurrent ankle sprains in high school athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(1):23–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2013.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hiller CE, Nightingale EJ, Raymond J, Kilbreath SL, Burns J, Black DA, et al. Prevalence and impact of chronic musculoskeletal ankle disorders in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(10):1801–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hubbard-Turner T, Turner MJ. Physical activity levels in college students with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2015;50(7):742–7. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-50.3.05.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Koplan JP, Powell KE, Sikes RK, Shirley RW, Campbell C. An epidemiologic study of the benefits and risks of running. JAMA. 1982;248(23):3118–21. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03330230030026.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    McKeon PO, Hubbard TJ, Wikstrom EA. Consequences of ankle inversion trauma: a novel recognition and treatment paradigm. In: Zaslav KR, editor. An international perspective on topics in sports medicine and sports injury. Rijeka: InTech; 2011. p. 457–73.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 1995;273(5):402–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520290054029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    De Bie R, De Vet H, Van den Wildenberg F, Lenssen T, Knipschild P. The prognosis of ankle sprains. Int J Sports Med. 1997;18(4):285–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-972635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Bamber ZA, Fong D, Wheeler P. Assessing lateral ankle sprain risk using lower limb anthropometrics. ISBS Proc Arch. 2018;36(1):334–7.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Cooke M, Marsh J, Clark M, Nakash R, Jarvis R, Hutton J, et al. Treatment of severe ankle sprain: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of mechanical ankle support with tubular bandage. The CAST trial. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2009;13(13):iii ix–x 1–121.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Horisberger M, Fung TS. Ligamentous posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(4):612–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Croy T, Saliba S, Saliba E, Anderson MW, Hertel J. Differences in lateral ankle laxity measured via stress ultrasonography in individuals with chronic ankle instability, ankle sprain copers, and healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(7):593–600. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hirose K, Murakami G, Minowa T, Kura H, Yamashita T. Lateral ligament injury of the ankle and associated articular cartilage degeneration in the talocrural joint: anatomic study using elderly cadavers. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(1):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-003-0732-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kaminski TW, Needle AR, Delahunt E. Prevention of lateral ankle sprains. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):650–61. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-487-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ayis S, Dieppe P. The natural history of disability and its determinants in adults with lower limb musculoskeletal pain. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(3):583–91. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.080455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Brooks PM. The burden of musculoskeletal disease—a global perspective. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25(6):778–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0240-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Dominick KL, Ahern FM, Gold CH, Heller DA. Health-related quality of life and health service use among older adults with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2004;51(3):326–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Felson DT. An update on the pathogenesis and epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin. 2004;42(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(03)00161-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(8):635–46. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Kopec J, Sayre E, Flanagan W, Fines P, Cibere J, Rahman MM, et al. Development of a population-based microsimulation model of osteoarthritis in Canada. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18(3):303–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.10.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Kuijt M-TK, Inklaar H, Gouttebarge V, Frings-Dresen MH. Knee and ankle osteoarthritis in former elite soccer players: a systematic review of the recent literature. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(6):480–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2012.02.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Neogi T. The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(9):1145–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Uthman OA, van der Windt DA, Jordan JL, Dziedzic KS, Healey EL, Peat GM, et al. Exercise for lower limb osteoarthritis: systematic review incorporating trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:347–59.

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Lonner JH, Pedlow FX, Siliski JM. Total knee arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthrosis. J Arthroplast. 1999;14(8):969–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90012-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Saltzman CL, Salamon ML, Blanchard GM, Huff T, Hayes A, Buckwalter JA, et al. Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consecutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopaedic center. Iowa Orthopaed J. 2005;25:44–6.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Blagojevic M, Jinks C, Jeffery A, Jordan K. Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18(1):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Buckwalter JA. Sports, joint injury, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(10):578–88. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2003.33.10.578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Davis MA, Ettinger WH, Neuhaus JM, Cho SA, Hauck WW. The association of knee injury and obesity with unilateral and bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130(2):278–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Tran G, Smith TO, Grice A, Kingsbury SR, McCrory P, Conaghan PG. Does sports participation (including level of performance and previous injury) increase risk of osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(23):1459–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Joseph MF, Rahl M, Sheehan J, MacDougall B, Horn E, Denegar CR, et al. Timing of lower extremity frontal plane motion differs between female and male athletes during a landing task. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(7):1517–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510397175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    McLean S, Walker K, van den Bogert AJ. Effect of gender on lower extremity kinematics during rapid direction changes: an integrated analysis of three sports movements. J Sci Med Sport. 2005;8(4):411–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1440-2440(05)80056-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Conn JM, Annest JL, Bossarte RM, Gilchrist J. Non-fatal sports and recreational violent injuries among children and teenagers, United States, 2001–2003. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(6):479–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Kelso J. Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys. 1984;246(6):1000–4.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Quatman-Yates CC, Quatman CE, Meszaros AJ, Paterno MV, Hewett TE. A systematic review of sensorimotor function during adolescence: a developmental stage of increased motor awkwardness? Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(9):649–55. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.079616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Robertson SD, Zelaznik HN, Lantero DA, Bojczyk KG, Spencer RM, Doffin JG, et al. Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999;25(5):1316–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Scott Kelso J, Holt KG, Rubin P, Kugler PN. Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. J Mot Behav. 1981;13(4):226–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1981.10735251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Davids K, Glazier P. Deconstructing neurobiological coordination: the role of the biomechanics-motor control nexus. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(2):86–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e3181d4968b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Davids K, Glazier P, Araujo D, Bartlett R. Movement systems as dynamical systems. Sports Med. 2003;33(4):245–60. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333040-00001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Naimark A, Weissman BN, Aliabadi P, et al. The incidence and natural history of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly, the Framingham osteoarthritis study. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(10):1500–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780381017.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Oliveria SA, Felson DT, Reed JI, Cirillo PA, Walker AM. Incidence of symptomatic hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a health maintenance organization. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(8):1134–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Zhang Y, Jordan JM. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26(3):355–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2010.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, ter Riet G. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326(7386):417–23. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Boyce S, Quigley M, Campbell S. Management of ankle sprains: a randomised controlled trial of the treatment of inversion injuries using an elastic support bandage or an Aircast ankle brace. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(2):91–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2003.009233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Matthews PA, Scammell BE, Ali A, Coughlin T, Nightingale J, Khan T, et al. Early motion and directed exercise (EMADE) versus usual care post ankle fracture fixation: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19-28(1):304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Fernandes GS, Sarmanova A, Warner S, Harvey H, Akin-Akinyosoye K, Richardson H, et al. Knee pain and related health in the community study (KPIC): a cohort study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18-30(1):404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ingham SL, Moody A, Abhishek A, Doherty SA, Zhang W, Doherty M. Development and validation of self-reported line drawings for assessment of knee malalignment and foot rotation: a cross-sectional comparative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Zhang W, Robertson J, Doherty S, Liu J, Maciewicz R, Muir K, et al. Index to ring finger length ratio and the risk of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(1):137–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(10):788–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070102201004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Janssen M, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Cushnaghan J, Dieppe P. Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis. I. Analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.50.1.8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Valderrabano V, Horisberger M, Russell I, Dougall H, Hintermann B. Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(7):1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Brown TD, Johnston RC, Saltzman CL, Marsh JL, Buckwalter JA. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: a first estimate of incidence, prevalence, and burden of disease. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(10):739–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000246468.80635.ef.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Milgrom C, Shlamkovitch N, Finestone A, Eldad A, Laor A, Danon YL, et al. Risk factors for lateral ankle sprain: a prospective study among military recruits. Foot Ankle. 1991;12(1):26–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079101200105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Sitler M, Ryan J, Wheeler B, McBride J, Arciero R, Anderson J, et al. The efficacy of a semirigid ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in basketball: a randomized clinical study at west point. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(4):454–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659402200404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Kellgren J, Lawrence J, Bier F. Genetic factors in generalized osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1963;22(4):237–55. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.22.4.237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Schouten J, Van den Ouweland F, Valkenburg H. A 12 year follow up study in the general population on prognostic factors of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51(8):932–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.51.8.932.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Torg JS, Quedenfeld T. Effect of shoe type and cleat length on incidence and severity of knee injuries among high school football players. Res Q Am Assoc Health Phys Educ Recreat. 1971;42(2):203–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1971.10615058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Hansen AH, Childress DS. Effects of shoe heel height on biologic rollover characteristics during walking. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(4):547–54. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2003.06.0098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Altarac M, Gardner JW, Popovich RM, Potter R, Knapik JJ, Jones BH. Cigarette smoking and exercise-related injuries among young men and women. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00166-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Estruch R, Sacanella E, Fernandez-Sola J, Nicolas JM, Rubin E, Urbano-Marquez A. Natural history of alcoholic myopathy: a 5-year study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998;22(9):2023–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Ueno S, Hisanaga N, Jonai H, Shibata E, Kamijima M. Association between musculoskeletal pain in Japanese construction workers and job, age, alcohol consumption, and smoking. Ind Health. 1999;37(4):449–56. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.37.449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the patients who have kindly given their time to take part in this study. We would also like to extend thanks to all the clinical, research and administrative staff involved in the recruitment of participants at all the recruiting sites. Recruiting centres were the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Laura Wyatt (PI), The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds General Infirmary and St James Hospital, Stuart Nuttall (PI), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh- NHS Lothian, Alasdair Gray (PI), Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Rebecca Boulton (PI), University Hospital Coventry, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Catherine Morgan (PI), Royal Berkshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liza Keating (PI) Warwick Hospital; South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Elaine Hardy (PI), and Royal Derby Hospital; University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Graham Johnson (PI). Patient Identification Sites: Urgent Care Centre Nottingham – City Care, Laura Wyatt (PI) and Hospital of St Cross Rugby, Catherine Morgan (PI).

Funding

This study was supported financially by the Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis (Grant reference 20194 and 21595), British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine and Nottingham Hospitals Charity. The funders did not have a specific role, and has not influenced the study’s design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript write up.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DP, RK, FC, MEB and BES were responsible for conception of the study. LAW, DP, AC, RK, FC,MEB and BES were responsible for study design. LW, DP, MEB and BES were responsible for acquisition of funding for the study. TBS, LAW, DP, MEB and BES drafted the manuscript and substantively revised it. All authors have read, revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Bestwick-Stevenson.

Ethics declarations

The authors have nothing to declare.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All aspects of this study were approved by the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee (NREC reference: 15/EM/0384) on 5th November 2015, and the Research & Innovation department of Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (study sponsor). All participants were required to provide their written informed consent prior to joining the study.

Consent for publication

Informed consent to publish anonymised data was obtained in writing from all participants.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

SALI baseline questionnaire.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bestwick-Stevenson, T., Wyatt, L.A., Palmer, D. et al. Incidence and risk factors for poor ankle functional recovery, and the development and progression of posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis after significant ankle ligament injury (SALI): the SALI cohort study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04230-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ankle sprain
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Injury
  • Cohort study
  • Study protocol