Skip to main content

Occupational influences on Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in a cohort of 18-year-old male military conscripts



The reported prevalence of spondylolysis (SL) in the adult population is 6–7%. Data concerning adolescent-onset spondylolisthesis (SLS) and the impact of certain activities on it is scarce. We examined the risk of clinical progression of SL and SLS as a function of primary severity and occupational strain among military recruits.


Based on the Israel defense Force (IDF) central human resources database, we identified 1521 18-year-old males inducted to the IDF with SL/SLS between the late nineteen nineties and early two-thousands. We followed changes in the SL/SLS status during the 3 years of obligatory military service. Disease severity was classified as Cat2: radiological findings of SL without clinical findings; Cat3: painful SL or asymptomatic grade 1 SLS; Cat4: grade 1 SLS with pain; Cat5: Grade 2 SLS. The soldiers were subdivided into the following occupational categories: administrative, combat, maintenance, and driving. The purpose was to compare the progression rates in different medical categories and job assignments.


There were 162 recruits in Cat2, 961 in Cat3, and 398 recruits in Cat4. The overall progression rate to Cat5 (grade 2 SLS) was 1.02%. Significant progression rates were seen amongst administrative soldiers with a relatively higher risk of progression from Cat4 (painful-grade-1 SLS: 2.2%) vs. Cat3 (asymptomatic SLS: 0.5%, relative risk = 4.7, p < 0.02). Other occupational categories did not exhibit significant progression rates.


Progression of SL/SLS was highest in Cat4, i.e. for recruits already diagnosed with painful SLS (i.e. with a more severe baseline disorder). Progression did not correlate with military occupation. We recommend further follow-up studies that include, aside from progression rates, incidence rates of newly diagnosed grade 2 SL during military service.

Peer Review reports


The term spondylolisthesis (SLS) refers to slipping, or listhesis, of a vertebra (“spondylos” in Greek) relative to an adjacent vertebra. Spondylolysis (SL) refers to the dissolution of or a defect in the pars interarticularis of a vertebra [1]. The reported prevalence of SL in the adult population is 6–7% [2, 3]. In certain ethnic groups, the prevalence is considerably higher, which probably indicates a genetic predisposition [4, 5].

The natural progression of SL has been investigated in longitudinal studies through development to skeletal maturity. Fredrickson et al. followed 500 primary-school-aged children prospectively, demonstrating an incidence rate of 4.4% of SL at the age of six, progressing to 6% at skeletal maturity [2]; slip progression beyond skeletal maturity was rare in their cohort. A 20-year follow-up of adult patients with SL demonstrated that 40% of patients did not exhibit further slipping, 40% showed a slippage increase of 1-5 mm, and 5% of patients were observed as having significant further slippage [6].

Adolescent-onset SLS has been associated with various sports involving hyperextensions, such as gymnastics, cricket, and soccer and explained because of either an acute injury or a fatigue fracture resulting from repetitive stress exerted across the pars. Spondylolysis was more commonly seen in sports characterized by forceful and repetitive hyperextension-hyperflexion and rotation of the lumbar spine [7].

In contrast to the well-documented slippage progression in children and adolescents, adult progression of isthmic SLS has rarely been described or discussed in the literature. Overall, it was concluded that the risk of progression of SL, with or without low-grade SLS, to a more significant slippage, is rare [8]. The literature on this issue is deficient as no standard has been set to define what degree of slip progression is significant [8]. In occupational medicine literature, we found only one study published on the subject investigating the association between professional driving and SLS [9]. The study found that the rate of acquired SLS was higher among those driving > 15 years compared to those driving ≤5 years (7.1% compared to 1.1%, respectively) [9].

In the current study, we aimed to understand the contributing factors for developing grade 2 SLS, with pain and neurological findings in military conscripts. Conscripts were categorized as having radiological findings of SL without clinical findings or painful SLS grade 1. Different military job assignments represented varying occupational settings. We hypothesized the existence of a linear dose-response relationship between progression rates and higher-strain occupations.


Data source

The study cohort was a subgroup of all 17-year-old male Israeli military recruits reporting to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for pre-induction medical examinations between the end-nineties to the early two-thousands (the total numbers and exact time framework were not declassified). Data of the recruits’ pre-induction medical files were reviewed. All recruits answered a detailed medical questionnaire, followed by a face-to-face interview relating to their medical history and responses to the questionnaire. The recruits were asked directly about past or present musculoskeletal or back symptoms and morbidity. The physical examination was performed by a physician and included a thorough examination of the musculoskeletal system. Imaging and specialist referrals (usually an orthopedic surgeon) were utilized as necessary primarily for recruits with a previously unreported finding or with an unclear diagnosis. The referral included a detailed history and a physical examination supplemented by imaging and laboratory tests, as needed. The specialists were instructed to review any documentation and imaging and, as required, request further information, based on the date of assessment and how it coincided with the clinical presentation. As SL/SLS diagnoses require mandatory imaging, physicians could only encode the diagnosis if presented with a signed medical record and an imaging result. Any pars defect resulted in SL classification, so it was impossible to differentiate between unilateral and bilateral SL. Relatively recent radiographs were mandatory for higher grades of SLS. The follow-up period of 36 months aligned with Israel’s obligatory service period, comprised the occupational exposure period.

Occupational categories

The soldiers were subdivided according to their military assignment into the following occupational categories: Combat Units (CU), Maintenance Units (MU), Driving Units (DU), and Administrative Units (AU). The CU service includes exceptionally strenuous physical activity and high mental stress. MU service is characterized by moderate physical activity and moderate mental stress (mechanics, welders, electricians and others), DU includes driving professions and includes either trucks or private vehicles. The AU service is predominantly characterized by sedentary office work, low mental, and no physical stress. We used these categories as markers for occupational stress.

The medical Spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis categories

Recruits were classified at the recruiting offices into the medical SL/SLS categories (Cat1-Cat7) presented in Table 1, as previously described [10]. The grades of SLS refer to the measure of displacement whereby Grade 1: less than 25%; Grade 2: 25 to 50% and higher (referring to Grade 3: 50 to 75%; Grade 4: 75 to 100%; and Grade 5: complete). These categories were documented in the IDF central human resources database before induction and updated if any significant change in the soldier’s medical status occurred.

Table 1 Medical Spondylolysis/ Spondylolisthes categories assigned at recruiting offices, and updated throughout three years of army service. Each category was assigned based on the severity grading of Spondylolysis/Spondylolisthesis

Overall, the study population we followed for exacerbation included 1521 subjects who met the inclusion criteria (soldiers in SL/SLS category 1 were not included in our study). Soldiers in categories 2 to 3 were assigned to and served in all occupational categories. Soldiers in category 4 were generally restricted from CU and served in either MU, DU, or AU. Soldiers in category 5 served in DU or AU only. Those in category 6 and 7 were medically disqualified from mandatory service. Table 2 provides the corresponding percentages of assignments based on medical severity. The above assignment plan may have influenced our dose-response ratio due to the inverse relationship between disease severity and occupational strain – the highest severity soldiers (Cat.4) were denied the highest strain occupations (combat). Nonetheless, the fact that driving and maintenance professions, which are categorized by higher strain compared to administrative professions, and the similar percentage of soldiers assigned to these occupations serve to mitigate any significant bias in that aspect.

Table 2 Percentage of soldiers assigned to each occupational group by medical severity

Follow up during the military service

All subjects were followed for 36 months by the units’ physicians noting any newly diagnosed conditions involving low back pain, SL or SLS. Any newly diagnosed illness or progression (based on complaint or injury) was documented by mandatory to referral to a military medical board that updated the SL/SLS category in the IDF central human resources database as was any change in duty assignment. The study endpoint per subject was defined as a change from the preliminary SL/SLS category (Cat2–4) to a higher category (Cat5 or beyond) during the three-year obligatory military service. This process was supervised and monitored by a trained physician stationed at the IDF medical corps headquarters.

Data analysis

The relative risk (RR) calculated as the proportion of progression to Cat5 in Cat4 divided by the proportion of progression to Cat5 in Cat2 or Cat3, and Fisher’s exact 95% confidence intervals, are presented. The significance of point estimates was assessed using a χ2 test with correction for continuity. A p < 0.05 in two-tailed tests was considered to be significant. RR and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a standard statistical package (Compare2 version 1.28, Copyright JH Abramson 2000–2001).


The groupings of the cohort of 1521 conscripts identified with Cat2 to Cat4 SL/SLS are presented in Table 2. Progression to Cat5 during the 3 years of obligatory military service was seen in 16 subjects (1.02%). Table 3 delineates the various occupational groups’ contributions to this progression, primarily, the AU with its high proportion in the cohort (10/1052) and the combatants with the relative high progression rate (1.8%, 5/275, even though recruits with Cat4 were banned from CU). The RR for progression by job assignments are presented in Table 4. The RR for progression was higher in Cat4 than Cat3 only in AU (RR = 4.7, p < 0.05). The higher difference between occupational groups was found between CU and MU (RR = 1.8/0.8 = 2.4, CI = 0.3–20.2, NS), but without statistical significance. There was no progression amongst the drivers, but this is not significant as there were only 63 in DU.

Table 3 Progression of spondylolysis or grade-1- spondylolisthesis (Categories 2–4) to grade-2- spondylolisthesis or higher (Cat5-Cat7) by job assignments
Table 4 Relative risk for progression between categories in different job assignments*


In this study, we investigated the progression rates to SLS grade 2 from SL and SLS grade 1 in a population of 1521 recruits according to their profession (CU, MU, DU, AU) during 36 months follow up. The main findings were that the incidence rate of progression of SL or SLS grade 1 to SLS grade 2 was 1.02% and that the RR for developing severe SLS was higher in category 4 compared to category 3 in AU (RR = 4.7, p < 0.05). The overall incidence of SL/SLS in the population from which the cohort was drawn can not be published, though the SL/SLS categories’ overall incidence may be seen in Bar Dayan et al. publication [10].

In skeletally immature individuals, the tendency for lumbosacral slip progression is well known. Slip progression is most likely to occur in adolescents younger than 15 years of age, usually during the adolescent growth spurt [11]. In contrast to the well-documented slip progression in children and adolescents [3, 7, 8], especially in athletes [7], the adult progression of isthmic SLS has rarely been described or discussed in the literature [11, 12]. Some authors even dispute its existence and clinical importance [2, 8]. Harris and Weinstein [12] reported the outcome of 11 patients in whom Grade-III and IV SLS were treated non-operatively over an average eighteen-year follow-up and found that 5/11 had one or more neurological findings, but none were incontinent. In his work, Floman [11] described 18 patients, ages 32 to 55 years, with documented adult isthmic slip progression who reported incapacitating low back pain, accompanied in most by significant sciatica. Documented slip progression ranged from 9 to 30% (average, 14.6%), and occurred from 2 to 20 years. Seitsalo et al. [13] followed-up 272 patients with SLS aged 14.3 for 14.9 years and found that 23% of adult patients exhibited some slip progression. Virta and Osterman [14] reported a 5.6% slip increase over a 17-year follow-up in 40 adult patients with SLS who had not undergone operations. Our study reflects a mean annual progression of 0.34% compared to 2% [6], 1.5% [12] and 0.32% in other studies. The variance between incidence rates emerges from different severity classifications, different age groups, and different follow-up times. Fredrickson et al. [2] estimated that approximately 15% of individuals with a pars interarticularis lesion had progression to SLS. The slip was seen predominately during the growth spurt, with minimal change after sixteen years. Others have accepted this concept [8]. Our cohort of 1521 patients is larger than all the previous studies [11,12,13,14] summed together (341 patients) and proves that the risk of progression of SL or low-grade SLS to a more significant slip is not ignorable and is 1.02% in 3 years among 18-year-old males.

We had hypothesized that there would be different progression rates in different severity scales of SL/SLS patients, specifically that the progression rate would be higher in Cat4. The low progression rate enabled statistical significance only in the large sample group (AU, that comprised two-thirds of our study population). In this group, the incidence of progression rate to Cat5 (SLS Grade 2 or higher) from Cat3 (Painful SL or asymptomatic grade 1 SLS) and category 4 (Grade 1 SLS with pain) was 0.5 and 2.2%, i.e. the RR was 4.7 (p < 0.05). This significance did not appear in the overall calculations, possibly due to the exclusion of Cat4 in CU. We did not find similar results in other studies; however, the incidence in Seitsalo et al. [13] for SLS patients’ progression was 2% yearly but without any comparison within subgroups.

We also hypothesized to find higher CU progression rates than AU and MU since they have more physical and strenuous activities and training during their services. It is known, that sports professionals have a significantly greater prevalence of SL and SLS, for instance, gymnastics (30%), American football (20%), weight lifting (23–30%), and wrestling (30–35%) [7, 11, 15]. The literature also shows an approximately fourfold increase of SL and SLS in adolescent dancers than the general population [16]. This increased incidence is mainly attributed to the repetitive shear forces of hyperextension positions and the poor mechanics and alignment often used by young dancers to obtain their positions. Ishimoto et al. [17] found, in a nested case-control study (722 vs. 605, mean age 70), that occupational driving and working in the agricultural/fishing industry were associated with radiographic spondylolisthesis (Odds ratio: 2.4 and 3.5, respectively). We indeed found a difference in the incidence rate between CU (1.8%) to AU (1%) and MU (0.8%), but those differences were not statistically significant. We estimate that the difference in activities and the short period of follow-up is the reason for the negative results.

At first glimpse, it not clear why the only subgroup that progressed with a significant RR was the AU. Two factors may contribute to this: almost 70% of the cohort was in AU; the second largest group was CU, from which Cat4 was banned.

The present study has several strengths. The first being that it is based on a large cohort (1521 subjects). Second, SL and SLS’s definition is exact and decided by a military medical committee based to a great extent on imaging (particularly crucial for Cat5 - SLS grade 2, since it is dependent on imaging). Third, SL/SLS data were collected from computerized data, guaranteeing a high coverage of progression. Fourth, all soldiers were conscripts in obligatory service of uniform age, rank, living conditions, and diet provided for each occupation.

There are several limitations to this study. We could not publish the actual number of subjects from which our cohort was drawn due to military censor restrictions. The study includes only male recruits, and therefore the conclusions are limited to males and possibly soldiers in general. The tendency to allocate higher grades of SL/SLS to less strainful occupations could have caused bias. Since the incidence of progression from SL to SLS is generally small, the size of our cohort, despite being much more prominent than other studies, is still not big enough to provide overall statistically significant results, beyond the stated subgroups. Moreover, despite collecting the baseline data prospectively, our study is retrospective. Data was not collected for research purposes and prevented differentiation between unilateral and bilateral SL and might have skipped asymptomatic SL/SLS progression.


We found that progression from SL or low-grade SLS to a painful or high-grade SLS during early adulthood (ages 18–21) is 0.34% yearly. We found some clues which support the hypothesis that the higher the severity scale, the higher the RR. It seems that the type of duty has an effect, but since the follow-up was too short, and the activities were not equivalent to those of elite sportspeople, the results were not conclusive. Our data do not support changing the IDF human resources criteria for job allocation. More research is needed, with longer follow-up and larger groups, to understand SL and SLS’s occupational implications in different jobs better.

Availability of data and materials

The data is kept at the IDF, Medical Corps. The raw data cannot be shared due to limitations on exporting data form military databases.



Israel Defense Forces


Combat Units


Maintenance Units


Administrative Units






Relative Risk


Confidence interval


  1. 1.

    Hu SS, Tribus CB, Diab M, Ghanayem AJ. Spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(3):656–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ, Yuan HA, Lubicky JP. The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:699e707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Virta L, Ronnemaa T, Osterman K, Aalto T, Laakso M. Prevalence of isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis in middle-aged subjects from eastern and western Finland. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:917e22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wynne-Davies R, Scott JH. Inheritance and spondylolisthesis: a radiographic family survey. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1979;61B:301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Albanese M, Pizzutillo PD. Family study of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2:496–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Saraste H. Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987;7:631–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Stanitski CL. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in athletes. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2006;14:141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Standaert CJ, Herring SA. Spondylolysis: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34:415–22.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chen JC, Chan WP, Katz JN, Chang WP, Christiani DC. Occupational and personal factors associated with acquired lumbar spondylolisthesis of urban taxi drive. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:992–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bar-Dayan Y, Morad Y, Elishkevitz KP, Bar-Dayan Y, Finestone AS. Back disorders among Israeli youth: a prevalence study in young military recruits. Spine J. 2012;12:749–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Floman Y. Progression of lumbosacral isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. Spine. 2000;25:342–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Harris IE, Weinstein SL. Long-term follow-up of patients with grade II and IV spondylolisthesis: treatment with or without posterior spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:960–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Seitsalo S, Osterman K, Hyvarinen H, Tallroth K, Schlenzka D, Poussa M. Progression of spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: a long-term follow-up of 272 patients. Spine. 1991;16:417–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Virta LJ, Osterman K. Radiographic correlations in adult symptomatic spondylolisthesis: a long-term follow-up study. J Spinal Disord. 1994;7:41–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mortazavi J, Zebardast J, Mirzashahi B. Low Back pain in athletes. Asian J Sports Med. 2015;6:e24718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gottschlich LM, Young CC. Spine injuries in dancers. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011;10:40–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ishimoto Y, Cooper C, Ntani G, et al. Is radiographic lumbar spondylolisthesis associated with occupational exposures? Findings from a nested case-control study within the Wakayama spine study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references




The study was not funded.

Author information




All authors participated in the study’s design, made revisions of the manuscript, and approved the final version. OZ supervised the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. YB collected the data and supervised the data analysis. ASF performed a critical review of the manuscript. AK performed the literature review. DS and DAN critically reviewed the manuscript and interpreted the data based on their professional perspectives. SM initiated the work and performed the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shlomo Moshe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from The IDF medical corps ethics committee. The IDF ethics committee waived the need for formal informed consent since actual patient files were not reviewed in this study but only computerized data (reference number IDF-885-2009).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors have any competing interests. The authors do not have any commercial or collaborative relationships that could be construed as biased or inappropriate. The decision to submit the paper for publication was not influenced by any funding body.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zack, O., Barak, Y., Finestone, A.S. et al. Occupational influences on Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in a cohort of 18-year-old male military conscripts. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21, 720 (2020).

Download citation


  • Spondylolysis
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Occupational
  • Low Back pain
  • Army recruits
  • Risk factor
  • Athlete
  • Adolescents