- Case report
- Open access
- Published:
Giant intradural plexiform schwannoma of the lumbosacral spine - a case report and literature review
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 21, Article number: 454 (2020)
Abstract
Background
Plexiform schwannoma (PS), variant of schwannoma, often involves multiple fascicles as plexiform neurofibroma, and is usually located superficially on the dermis and subcutaneous layers. Spinal PS is extremely rare, and there is insufficient information on its natural course and treatment strategy. We describe the clinical features and treatment of giant intradural PS at the lumbosacral spine.
Case presentation
A 66-year-old man presented with leg pain, paresthesia, and weakness for 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a large mass lesion involving a continuous multi-lobulated bead-like mass and a cystic portion from L1 to S3. The lesion was iso-intense on T2-weighted images (WI), iso- to slightly low-intense on T1-WI, and heterogeneous enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1-WI. The large mass lesion had three portions, including a cystic mass at L1, continuous multi-lobulated bead-like mass with a cystic portion from L2 to S1, and multi-lobulated mass from S2 to S3, which were identified with severe adhesions with cauda equina on operative assessment. Grossly total extirpation was achieved at the lumbar spine, and remained three round shaped small masses at the lumbar area and a multi-lobulated round masses from S2 to S3 involving nerves related with motor function of the lower extremities and anal sphincter, respectively. Histological examination revealed multinodular or plexiform growth pattern composed of spindle-shaped tumor cells, which were diffusely and strongly positive for S100 protein with KI67 < 1%. There were no recurrence of preoperative symptoms and changes of the remained masses over a 2-year follow-up period.
Conclusion
Subtotal extirpation to minimize neural deficits and close observation can be considered an appropriate treatment strategy for a giant spinal PS considering its benign prognosis and histological features, with a high risk of neurological damage during surgery.
Background
Schwannoma is a slow-growing benign tumor arising from Schwann cells of the nerve sheaths of peripheral nerves and believed to originate from embryonic neural crest cells [1]. Generally, spinal schwannoma presents with pain and/or neurologic deficits when it grows. In some cases, it presents as a large mass that extends into the vertebra body and extraspinal space [2, 3]. Few cases of spinal giant schwannoma arising from the lumbosacral area were reported in the literature with a rare incidence [2,3,4]. There are still very limited data in the previous literatures. Among the schwannoma entities, approximately 5% of schwannoma develop into plexiform schwannomas (PSs) as a histological subtype [5]. PS is located superficially on the dermis and subcutaneous layers as an asymptomatic solitary nodule with slow growth in 90% of cases [6]. Non-cutaneous deep-seated lesions, particularly spinal PSs, are extremely rare, and there are still very limited data in the previous literatures [7,8,9].
We report the experience of surgical treatment and 2-year follow-up for the spinal giant intradural PS located extensive lumbosacral area.
Case presentation
A 66-year-old man presented with both leg pain and paresthesia for 2 years. The symptoms aggravated in recent 6-month. The patient had a history of alcoholic liver cirrhosis and cured stomach cancer after subtotal gastrectomy 15 years ago with hematological abnormalities including thrombocytopenia (94 K) and anemia (7.6). Neurological examination showed grade 4 motor weakness of the lower extremities and neurogenic claudication with no bowel or bladder dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a large multi-lobulated bead-like mass lesion with a cystic portion from L1 to S3. The lesion was iso-intense on T2-weighted images (WI) and iso- to slightly low-intense on T1-WI with heterogeneous enhancement (Fig. 1). Neurophysiological study revealed multiple lumbar radiculopathies. There was no additional lesion of central nervous system on the whole spine and brain MR imaging with no abnormal skin lesion.
The extensive multi-lobulated mass lesions were located intraspinal canal and attached with neural components, which is judged to be difficult to access for a biopsy. We decided on surgical treatment to confirm a histological finding and improve the symptoms with removal of the mass lesion. The large mass lesion had three portions, including a cystic mass at L1, continuous multi-lobulated bead-like mass with cystic portion from L2 to S1, and multi-lobulated round masses from S2 to S3, which were identified under dural opening after total laminectomy of L1-S2. There were severe adhesions and tangles between the large mass lesion and the cauda equina with thickened arachnoid membrane and septum. The mass lesion from L1 to S1 was gross totally removed. We retained several small masses at the lumbar spine and multi-lobulated round masses from S2 to S3 involving nerves related with motor function of lower extremities and anal sphincter, respectively, under intraoperative monitoring.
The patient experienced voiding difficulty with no other additional neurologic deficits after surgery. Histological examination revealed multinodular or plexiform growth pattern composed of spindle-shaped tumor cells. The tumor cells had elongated wavy nuclei and arranged in fascicular pattern with focal nuclear palisading, which were diffusely and strongly positive for S100 protein with KI67 < 1% (Fig. 2). A benign PS was eventually confirmed. We decided to observe the remaining mass lesion based on the histology and patient’s refusal for further surgery. The postoperative voiding difficulty and leg weakness completely recovered with no disturbance for normal social activities. There were almost complete removal of the large mass at the lumbar spine, as well as a multi-lobulated round masses at S2-S3 with no changes at 2-year follow-up (Fig. 3).
Discussion
PS shows histologic features similar to those of conventional schwannoma, except for a more Antoni A pattern. However, PS shows complex growth and often involves multiple fascicles, and this differs from the single fascicle involvement of conventional schwannoma. Based on these features, it is difficult to achieve complete excision of PS without damaging multiple fascicles and neurological deficits [9]. Differential diagnosis from plexiform neurofibroma is required, which is one of the most common types of neurofibroma. Plexiform neurofibroma is related with neurofibromatosis type I and carries malignant potential risk [10]. However, unlike plexiform neurofibroma, PS is not thought to have the potential for malignant transformation [6]. There has been one report of PS, which changed to a malignant angiosarcoma [11].
Three cases of spinal giant intradural PS have been reported in the literature, two were treated with grossly total extirpation and one was treated with subtotal extirpation (Table 1). The giant spinal PS in this study was more extensive with severe adhesions and tangles between the cauda equina and mass lesion compared with previous cases in the literature. Considering the size of tumor and adhesions with neural structures, we can expect difficulty in total extirpation and risk of neural damage. We think that sometimes subtotal extirpation is more appropriate than total extirpation for spinal PS with a high risk of neural damage. It can be more clearly based on the abovementioned characteristics of a PS, including relatively benign prognosis and histological features involving multiple fascicles that could be associated with neurological deficits. In this case, there were no changes in the remaining masses at S2-S3 over a 2-year follow-up. However, there are insufficient data for spinal PS in the literature owing to its low incidence. Further studies with a large number of spinal PSs are required to demonstrate the natural course of the remaining mass lesion and identify treatment strategies in a long-term perspective.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- PS:
-
Plexiform schwannoma
References
Conti P, Pansini G, Mouchaty H, Capuano C, Conti R. Spinal neurinomas: retrospective analysis and long-term outcome of 179 consecutively operated cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2004;61:34–43 discussion 4.
Yu NH, Lee SE, Jahng TA, Chung CK. Giant invasive spinal schwannoma: its clinical features and surgical management. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:58–66.
Sridhar K, Ramamurthi R, Vasudevan MC, Ramamurthi B. Giant invasive spinal schwannomas: definition and surgical management. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:210–5.
Ozturk C, Mirzanli C, Karatoprak O, Tezer M, Aydogan M, Hamzaoglu A. Giant sacral schwannoma: a case report and review of the literature. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75:705–10.
Rongioletti F, Drago F, Rebora A. Multiple cutaneous plexiform schwannomas with tumors of the central nervous system. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:431–2.
Agaram NP, Prakash S, Antonescu CR. Deep-seated plexiform schwannoma - a pathologic study of 16 cases and comparative analysis with the superficial variety. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1042–8.
Sakaura H, Ohshima K, Iwasaki M, Yoshikawa H. Intra-extradural plexiform schwannoma of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:E611–4.
Mori K, Imai S, Nishizawa K, Nakamura A, Ishida M, Matsusue Y. Plexiform schwannoma arising from cauda equina. Spine J. 2015;15:205–6.
Lam Shin Cheung V, Provias J, Cenic A. Plexiform schwannoma of the thoracolumbar spine a rare clinical entity - a case report. Br J Neurosurg. 2017;31:279–81.
Hebert-Blouin MN, Amrami KK, Scheithauer BW, Spinner RJ. Multinodular/plexiform (multifascicular) schwannomas of major peripheral nerves: an underrecognized part of the spectrum of schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:372–82.
Lee FY, Wen MC, Wang J. Epithelioid angiosarcoma arising in a deep-seated plexiform schwannoma: a case report and literature review. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1096–101.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2019M3E5D1A02068142).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, funding acquisition, and supervision: IJ. Data curation, methodology, and resources: IJ, DY, JHC. Writing - original draft: DY. Writing - review & editing: IJ. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the principles of the 1964 Declaration Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Voluntary written informed consent was obtained prior to the study from the patients.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication of this case report and any accompanying images was obtained from the patient. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, D., Choi, J.H. & Jeon, I. Giant intradural plexiform schwannoma of the lumbosacral spine - a case report and literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21, 454 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03492-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03492-y