Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Residual leg numbness after endoscopic discectomy treatment of lumbar disc herniation

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 21, Article number: 273 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy was popular in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Previous study focuses on the leg pain of disc herniation, and little study concern the residual leg numbness after surgery. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with leg pain and numbness.

Methods

Patients with one level lumbar disc herniation who had transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy from June 2016 to July 2019 were categorized into two groups according to the leg numbness. 293 patients initially fulfilled the study criteria, and 27 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 266 patients available for analysis, 81 cases with leg numbness and pain (A group), and 185 cases with leg pain (B). Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy was performed, and the clinical outcomes of blood loss, operation times, hospital stay days, pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS-pain), numbness (VAS-numbness), functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), and the disk height and intervertebral foramen height were recorded.

Results

All patients with pain and numbness pre-operation in group A, complain of leg numbness during or just after walking or standing not diminished after surgery in group A, and no one complain numbness after surgery in group B. The pain index and ODI score were better than preoperational in all patients (P < 0.01), and no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative disk and foramen height were no significant difference compare to preoperative in all patients (P > 0.05), and no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). The leg numbness symptoms last longer in central disc herniation patients (10.4 ± 2.2 months) than in paracentral (6.3 ± 2.1 months) and foraminal disc herniation patients (5.6 ± 2.3 months) after surgery (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Based on the results of this study, transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy was effective and safe procedures in the treatment of disc herniation with leg pain and numbness. The leg numbness symptoms last longer in central disc herniation patients than in paracentral and foraminal disc herniation patients after surgery.

Peer Review reports

Background

Lumbar disk herniation is one of the most common neuropathies that presents with lower extremity symptoms. With the development of concept and technique of minimally invasive spinal surgery, many minimally invasive techniques have been developed to the lumbar disc herniation [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The current trend of evolution lumbar disc surgery has been toward transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, which is a minimally invasive treatments aimed at removing nuclear material and decompression the nerve through devices were inserted percutaneous into intervertebral discs [8, 9]. The previous studies shown that transforaminal endoscopic discectomy has the advantages of minimal invasive doesn’t damage the spinal structures, safe procedures with less trauma and faster recovery, etc. The main advantages of it was its lower extremity pain symptoms was released at once after operation, which was the reason for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy has become popular [6, 7, 10, 11].

The most common lower extremity symptoms of lumbar disc herniation is pain, but often accompanied by numbness, tingling, and sometimes a burning sensation [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In lumbar disc herniation patients, pain and numbness of the lower extremities are the most typical symptoms, which disturbed walking ability and limit their activity of daily living. After discectomy and nerve decompression, the tingling and burning sensation often released with the pain [3, 11, 12, 19]. However, the numbness always present and don’t disappear with these accompanying symptoms [2, 7, 17, 20,21,22]. Pain and numbness are the most typical symptoms, which disturbed walking ability and limit their activity of daily living [12, 15, 23,24,25]. After operation, residual leg numbness following endoscopic lumbar discectomy can lower patient satisfaction, which led to patients usually complain of leg numbness during or just after walking or standing [13, 22, 26,27,28]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and efficacy of endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with numbness.

Methods

Patients with a one-level lumbar disc herniation at L4/5 or L5/S1 who underwent transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy from June 2016 to July 2019 were included. The exclusion criteria included pathologic conditions of the lumbar spine (trauma, tumor, or infection) and spinal central canal stenosis causing saddle hypesthesia with bowel and bladder dysfunction. The patients were categorized into two groups according to leg numbness. Two hundred and ninety-three patients met the criteria, and 27 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 266 patients available for analysis, 81 patients with leg numbness and pain (group A, including 44 men and 37 women with an average age of 39.47 ± 6.14 years), and 185 patients with leg pain (group B, including 99 men and 86 women with an average age of 40.15 ± 5.39 years). There was no significant difference in A and B on age and sex distribution, older and the pain history (Table 1, P > 0.05).

Table 1 General date of patients (Means ± SD)
Full size table

Surgical procedures

The transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy was performed with the patient prone on a radiolucent operating table. The entry point is planned by preoperative imaging (CT scan and MRI) which generally 10–13 cm from the midline, and the skin is infiltrated with 1% lidocaine (Figs. 1, 2, 3). A long 18-gauge spinal needle was inserted from the entry point toward the midline, in the anterior–posterior view, under intermittent fluoroscopic guidance [29, 30].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Thirty-nine years old female patient had L4/5 center disc herniation and right leg pain combine with numbness. The leg pain was disappeared after transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and nerve decompression, but the numbness was stayed until 8 months after operation. a show the skin marks, b and c was the MR image of the center disc herniation, d was the image of the endoscopic procedures, e show the herniation disc remove, and f was the removed disc herniation fragment

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Male patient of 41 years old had L5/S1 paracentral disc herniation and left leg pain combine with numbness. The leg pain was disappeared after transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and nerve decompression, but the numbness was stayed until 6 months after surgery. a show the skin marks, b and c was the MR image of the left paracentral disc herniation, d and e was the image of the endoscopic procedures, and F was the removed disc herniation fragment

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Male patient of 42 years old had L4/5 foraminal disc herniation and left leg pain combine with numbness. The leg pain was disappeared after transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and nerve decompression, but the numbness was stayed until 7 months after procedures. a show the skin marks, b was the CT image of the left foraminal disc herniation, c and d was the image of the endoscopic procedures, e show the nerve decompression, and f was the removed disc herniation fragment

Full size image

As usual performance of endoscopic discectomy, the discography was not performed (Figs. 1, 2, 3). A guide wire was then inserted and a small skin incision made around it. The dilator was inserted, and the 7 mm working sheath was inserted over the dilator. AP and lateral C-arm projections confirm the correct location of the working sheath. The endoscope is advanced through the tunnel to visualize the migrated disc herniation directly. When the disc is visualized, the use of radiofrequency probe can help shrink the fragment to be easily removed with flexible endoscopic forceps. After the herniated disc tissue was removed, the ventral epidural space is explored with an endoscopic nerve hook confirming that the herniated disc has been completely removed, and the traversing nerve root is free and totally decompression the stenosis.

Since the surgery is done under local anesthesia, the surgeon has complete communication with the patient in procedures, by checking the movements of the affected limb and patient complaining sudden and severe radicular pain during the procedure. Foraminoplasty was performed when disc herniation at L5/S1 level (Fig. 2), which removed small portions of anterolateral bone of facet articulation and its attached ligamentum flavum without interrupting the facet joint space, provided enough working space [31, 32]. A gentle hammering and twisting motion of the trephine removed anterolateral bony portions of the facet join. Then the lateral surface of the dural sac and traversing root, the posterior longitudinal ligament, and posterolateral annulus of the disc of the contralateral portion could be observed. Safely remove the herniated fragment, the ventral epidural space is explored with an endoscopic nerve hook confirming that the herniated disc has been completely removed, and the traversing nerve root is free and totally decompression the stenosis. Finally, the endoscope and working cannula are removed from the patient, and the wound is closed with a single skin suture.

Critical of clinical outcomes

Before surgery and at the one-year follow-up, operation times, blood loss, hospital stays, pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS-pain), numbness (VAS-numbness), functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), and Macnab criteria were quantified in follow-up. All patients had preoperative and post-operative plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance (MR) images. The focus was to evaluate height of disk space and intervertebral foramen. The disk and foraminal height were measured using X-ray film by the computer. The disk height was the means of the anterior and posterior disk height.

Statistical analysis

All measurements were performed by a single observer and are expressed as means ± SD. Using the SPSS 17.0 statistics software, classic t-test and chi-square test were performed. Between-group comparisons should be performed using unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests, while within-group comparisons (preoperative vs. postoperative) should be performed using paired t-tests. The threshold for statistical significance used in this study was p < 0.05.

Results

The disc herniation levels were shown Table 1 and no difference distribution between two groups in the surgical level of L4/5 or L5/S1 (P > 0.05). The follow-up data, hospital days, average operational time and blood loose were showed in Table 2. In ends 266 cases had follow-up at least 1 year and 27 cases lost, and the follow-up rate was 88.04% (81/92) in group A, and 92.03% (185/201) in group B (P > 0.05). The followed time was from 13 to 18 months (average 14 months) in all patients, and average 14.82 ± 1.29 months in group A, and 14.31 ± 1.45 months in group B (P > 0.05). The average operational time and blood loose was 41.72 ± 11.53 min and 32.37 ± 15.59 mL in group A, and 36.83 ± 11.84 min and 29.15 ± 12.64 mL in group B (P > 0.05). The hospital days were no significant difference between two groups patients (3.29 ± 1.15 days in group A, and 3.47 ± 1.28 days in group B, P > 0.05).

Table 2 Follow up time, hospital days, blood loss, and operation date of patients (Means ± SD)
Full size table

There were no infection and no dural tear of cerebrospinal fluid leakage complications in this series cases. On the Macnab criteria, there were no patients was poor results in all patients, and there was no significant difference of good or excellent between two group patients (85.2% in group A patients, and 86.5% in group B patients, P > 0.05). The general, good and excellent patients was 12, 27 and 42 cases in group A, and 25, 76 and 84 cases in group B.

Patients with pain and numbness pre-operation in group A, complain of leg numbness during or just after walking or standing not diminished after surgery (Fig. 4). However, no one complain numbness after surgery in group B, that patients no leg numbness in pre-operation. The average VAS-numbness scores were 7.58 ± 2.64 in pre-operation, 7.47 ± 2.72 in one-week post-operation, 6.89 ± 2.15 in 4 weeks post-operation, 5.34 ± 2.71 in 3 months post-operation, 3.46 ± 1.27 in 6 months post-operation, and 1.05 ± 0.38 in 12 months post-operation. The disk herniation location was significant difference between two groups (Table 1), and there were more central disc herniation patients in group A and more paracentral disc herniation in group B (P < 0.01). In group A, 46 patients were central herniation, 22 patients with paracentral herniation, and 13 patients was foraminal herniation. After operation, the leg numbness was lasted means 10.4 ± 2.2 months in the central disc herniation patients, released average 6.3 ± 2.1 months in paracentral disc herniation patients, and disappeared means 5.6 ± 2.3 months in foraminal disc herniation patients. The leg numbness symptoms last longer in central disc herniation patients than in paracentral and foraminal disc herniation patients after surgery (P < 0.01).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Residual leg numbness patients’ data. The pre-operation VAS-numbness scores was 7.58 ± 2.64 in group A patients. The post-operation VAS-numbness was 7.47 ± 2.72 in 1 week and 1.05 ± 0.38 in 50 weeks

Full size image

The VAS-pain index and ODI were better all patients (Table 3), and were significantly better than preoperative (P < 0.01). The VAS-pain improved from 8.29 ± 1.37 to 1.13 ± 0.46 in group A, and from 8.92 ± 1.51 to 1.18 ± 0.45 in group B. The ODI improved from 67.58 ± 14.57 to 12.41 ± 6.83 in group A, and from 63.49 ± 13.57 to 12.16 ± 6.35 in group B. There was no significant difference between two groups on the average change of VAS-pain and ODI scores (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Clinical results date of patients (Means ± SD)
Full size table

The average disk space height and intervertebral foramen height were showed in Table 3, and there was no significant difference of postoperative compare to preoperative height (P > 0.05). The average disk space height and intervertebral foramen height were from 8.68 ± 2.31 mm and 13.46 ± 1.76 mm in preoperatively to 7.15 ± 2.41 mm and 11.37 ± 1.82 mm in postoperatively in group A, and from 8.57 ± 2.49 mm and 13.45 ± 1.63 mm to 7.13 ± 2.18 mm and 11.39 ± 1.67 mm in group B.

Discussion

Degenerative lumbar disc herniation in adults that are part of the aging process may lead to compression of neurologic tissues within the spinal canal, subarticular zones or the foraminal zone, characterized by the pain of leg pain [13, 19, 33, 34]. Accurate anatomic classification of the disc herniation in the spinal canal can facilitates preoperative planning and can minimize the risk of surgical complications such as missed pathology and iatrogenic root injury [7, 23, 27]. With the minimal invasive techniques development, all sizes and types of disc herniation are possible in the hands of a skilled and experienced endoscopic surgeon [4, 14, 22]. According to the data of this case, the pain index and ODI scores were significantly better the preoperative in all patients (Figs. 1, 2, 3).

The most common symptom of lumbar disk herniation is leg pain, but this often accompanied by numbness, tingling, and sometimes a burning sensation [3, 28, 33, 35]. The transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy have been demonstrated to provide a number of benefits, include less tissue trauma, preservation of normal anatomical structures, and a faster recuperative period [24, 25]. Wang et al. reported transforaminal endoscopic discectomy has excellent overall clinical effects in treating common peroneal nerve paralysis induced by lumbar disc herniation by offer sufficient decompression of the nerve root [33]. However, the accompanying symptom of numbness was difficult to diminished at once after lumbar surgery [13, 21, 26, 28]. In this series cases, residual numbness cases shown leg numbness during or just after walking or standing not diminished after surgery (Fig. 4). Some patients had residual numbness lasting more than 6 months, and some cases feel better within 6 months after surgery.

In lumbar disc herniation patients, pain and numbness of the lower extremities are the most typical symptoms, which disturbed walking ability and limit their activity of daily living [1, 35, 36]. Differences in anatomic areas of herniation affect the presenting symptoms, and herniation located canal center or foraminal can causes significant disability [11, 22, 25, 37]. As previously reported, functional neuropathies in disk herniation can be classified into nerve root compression and spinal canal central compression [3, 14, 24, 37]. The spinal central canal compression may cause saddle hypesthesia with bowel and bladder dysfunction, but these cases was excluded in this series study. Oba et al. reported lumbar disc herniation patients with longer preoperative leg numbness duration and narrow preoperative dural sac cross-sectional area showed less leg numbness improvement [28]. The results of this series cases present that most numbness cases were central disc herniation (Fig. 1). After operation, the leg numbness was lasted longer in central disc herniation patients than in paracentral and foraminal disc herniation patients. In the nerve root compression, the dominate symptom is lower extremity pain, such as radicular pain or sciatic pain. On the other hand, in the spinal central canal compression type, patients show polyradicular symptoms such as lower extremity weakness and numbness [28, 38].

Pain symptoms from lumbar disc herniation are the most common health problems in population [2, 13, 15, 21]. The endoscopic discectomy procedure was safe procedures in the situation of central disc herniation, and the neurological improvement from decompression by removed the herniated disc tissue as the results of this study. The leg pain can be effectively released by endoscopic lumbar discectomy, but leg numbness not diminished at once after surgery [11, 26,27,28]. Numbness of the lower extremity at rest is difficult to improve even if surgical decompression is performed, which suggests severe degeneration of the nerve roots due to chronic compression [18, 28, 38]. Although some cases numbness is resolved within 6 months, this series cases study illustrates the importance of timely to care some patients suffered from the residual leg numbness symptoms postoperatively and lasting more than 6 months.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this study, transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy was effective and safe procedures in the treatment of disc herniation with leg pain and numbness. The leg numbness symptoms last longer in central disc herniation patients than in paracentral and foraminal disc herniation patients after surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets are available under reasonable request, please contact Yan.

Abbreviations

VAS:

Visual Analog Scale

ODI:

Oswestry Disability Index

CH:

Central herniation

PH:

Paracentral herniation

FH:

Foraminal herniation

CT:

computed tomography

MR:

magnetic resonance

References

  1. Choi DJ, Jung JT, Lee SJ, Kim YS, Jang HJ, Yoo B. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for recurrent lumbar disc Herniations. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8(3):325–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi KC, Kim JS, Kang BU, Lee CD, Lee SH. Changes in back pain after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and annuloplasty for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study. Pain Med. 2011;12(11):1615–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iprenburg M, Wagner R, Godschalx A, Telfeian AE. Patient radiation exposure during transforaminal lumbar endoscopic spine surgery: a prospective study. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40(2):E7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer HM, Brock M. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Neurosurg Rev. 1993;16(2):115–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang X, Zhou S, Bian Z, Li M, Jiang W, Hou C, Zhu L. Unilateral percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for lumbar infectious spondylitis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Li X, Dou Q, Hu S, Liu J, Kong Q, Zeng J, Song Y. Treatment of cauda equina syndrome caused by lumbar disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Acta Neurol Belg. 2016;116(2):185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yokosuka J, Oshima Y, Kaneko T, Takano Y, Inanami H, Koga H. Advantages and disadvantages of posterolateral approach for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Spine Surg. 2016;2(3):158–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S, Giannakopoulos A, Heikenfeld R, Kasch R, Merk H, Godolias G, Ruetten S. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Pain Physician. 2015;18(1):61–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJ. Clinical and radiological outcomes of Foraminal decompression using unilateral Biportal endoscopic spine surgery for lumbar Foraminal stenosis. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10(4):439–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu S, Xu YQ, Ding ZH, Wang YL, Shi JH, Zhong SZ. Clinical anatomic study of the lower lumbar anterolateral vein: with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Chin J Traumatol. 2008;11(2):110–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee CW, Yoon KJ. The usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic technique in multifocal lumbar pathology. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:9528102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu W, Li Q, Li Z, Chen L, Tian D, Jing J. Clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating adolescent lumbar disc herniation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(9):e14682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeom KS, Choi YS. Full endoscopic contralateral transforaminal discectomy for distally migrated lumbar disc herniation. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(3):263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee SH, Kang BU, Ahn Y, Choi G, Choi YG, Ahn KU, Shin SW, Kang HY. Operative failure of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a radiologic analysis of 55 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(10):E285–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jang JS, An SH, Lee SH. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(5):338–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rossiter JP, Brunet DG. A woman with leg numbness and weakness. Brain Pathol. 2016;26(5):675–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang L, Wang Y, Li Z, Yu B, Li Y. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg. 2014;14:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fishman SM. Surgery for leg numbness with back pain, patient controlled analgesia, phantom limb pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20(3):61–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, Miklitz B. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(9):973–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sairyo K, Goel VK, Masuda A, Biyani A, Ebraheim N, Mishiro T, Terai T. Biomechanical rationale of endoscopic decompression for lumbar spondylolysis as an effective minimally invasive procedure - a study based on the finite element analysis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005;48(2):119–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Passacantilli E, Lenzi J, Caporlingua F, Nardone A, Cannizzaro D, Pescatori L, Santoro A. Full endoscopic transforaminal endoscopic approach for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation, our experience. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016;60(3):410–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamson S, Trescot AM, Sampson PD, Zhang Y. Full-endoscopic assisted lumbar Decompressive surgery performed in an outpatient, ambulatory facility: report of 5 years of complications and risk factors. Pain Physician. 2017;20(2):E221–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tu Z, Li YW, Wang B, Lu G, Li L, Kuang L, Dai Y. Clinical outcome of full-endoscopic Interlaminar discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation: a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2017;20(3):E425–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee SH, Chung SE, Ahn Y, Kim TH, Park JY, Shin SW. Comparative radiologic evaluation of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open microdiscectomy: a matched cohort analysis. Mt Sinai J Med. 2006;73(5):795–801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shiboi R, Oshima Y, Kaneko T, Takano Y, Inanami H, Koga H. Different operative findings of cases predicted to be symptomatic discal pseudocysts after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(2):233–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Teli M, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M, Zagra A, Corriero A, Giudici F, Minoia L. Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(3):443–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JH, Lee SH. Which clinical and radiological variables could predict clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation? Spine J. 2018;18(8):1338–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oba H, Tsutsumimoto T, Yui M, Kamanaka T, Ohta H, Kosaku H, Misawa H. A prospective study of recovery from leg numbness following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Sci. 2017;22(4):670–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim HS, Paudel B, Jang JS, Lee K, Oh SH, Jang IT. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for all types of lumbar disc Herniations (LDH) including severely difficult and extremely difficult LDH cases. Pain Physician. 2018;21(4):E401–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu QF, Pan H, Fang YY, Jia GY. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for high-grade down-migrated disc using a trans-facet process and pedicle-complex approach: a technical case series. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(Suppl 3):393–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee S, Kim SK, Lee SH, Kim WJ, Choi WC, Choi G, Shin SW. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chung J, Kong C, Sun W, Kim D, Kim H, Jeong H. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar Foraminoplasty for lumbar Foraminal stenosis of elderly patients with unilateral radiculopathy: radiographic changes in magnetic resonance images. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2019;80(4):302–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang YP, Zhang W, Zhang J, Sun YP, An JL, Ding WY. Analysis of the clinical effects of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy on lumbar disk herniation combined with common peroneal nerve paralysis: a 2-year follow-up retrospective study on 32 patients. J Pain Res. 2017;10:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, Lee JS. Clinical and radiological outcomes of endoscopic partial facetectomy for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159(6):1129–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gadjradj PS, van Tulder MW, Dirven CM, Peul WC, Harhangi BS. Clinical outcomes after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective case series. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40(2):E3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dabo X, Ziqiang C, Yinchuan Z, Haijian N, Kai C, Yanbin L, Qiang F, Chuanfeng W. The clinical results of percutaneous endoscopic Interlaminar discectomy (PEID) in the treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a case-control study. Pain Physician. 2016;19(2):69–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee CW, Yoon KJ, Ha SS. Comparative analysis between three different lumbar decompression techniques (microscopic, tubular, and endoscopic) in Lumbar Canal and lateral recess stenosis: preliminary report. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:6078469.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Skeik N, Jabr FI. Intermittent back and leg pain with numbness. Tethered spinal cord syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78(7):869–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely appreciated the genial help from all scholars who contributed to our research.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the hospital ethics committee of the First People’s Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, and all patients signed had informed consent.

Funding

Not applicable of funding on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopedics department, First People’s Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, 526000, People’s Republic of China

    Denglu Yan

  2. Orthopedics department, People’s Hospital of Baoan, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518101, People’s Republic of China

    Zaiheng Zhang

  3. Orthopedics department, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, 510150, People’s Republic of China

    Zhi Zhang

Authors
  1. Denglu Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zaiheng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DY participated in the design of the study, performance the surgery, and drafted the manuscript. ZZh participated in the design of the study and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. ZZ participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denglu Yan.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, D., Zhang, Z. & Zhang, Z. Residual leg numbness after endoscopic discectomy treatment of lumbar disc herniation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21, 273 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03302-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03302-5

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us