- Research article
- Open Access
Combined lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches for Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane: a prospective study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 21, Article number: 229 (2020)
The objective of this study to evaluate prospectively the effectiveness of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane managed by combined lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches.
We analyzed 18 patients with Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane. There were 12 males and 6 females with an average of 38.5 years (range, 25–60 years). The mechanism of injury included traffic accident in 15 patients and falling in 3 patients. The injured lower limbs were right in 11 patients and left in 7 patients. The mean time from injury to surgery was 6.78 days (range, 5–9 days). There were 8 patients with meniscus injuries in our study.
The mean operation time was 3.41 h (range, 3–4 h). The mean blood loss was 352.78 ml (range, 300–410 ml). All the injured meniscuses were repaired. All patients were followed up, and the average time of follow up was 16.61 months (range, 14–22 months). Bone union was achieved at a mean of 12 weeks (range, 10–14 weeks). The mean degree of knee extension was 1.11° (range, 0–5°), and the mean degree of knee flexion was 120.56° (range, 110–130°). The mean points of KSS were 83 (range, 74–89 points). According to the criteria of KSS, 14 patients had clinical outcomes rated as excellent and 4 patients were rated as good.
Our results suggested that Combined lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches in the treatment of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane acquired satisfying outcomes. It was good for repairing the injured meniscus through our approaches.
Tibial plateau fractures are most commonly described according to the Schatzker classification system based on location, morphology and treatment. Schatzker type IV fractures are described as the fractures involving the medial plateau . They account for 10–30% of all tibial plateau fractures [2, 3]. The type IV fractures commonly result from high-energy trauma, and usually accompany with associated injuries of meniscus and ligaments [3, 4], Therefore, the treatment is still difficult in clinical practice, especially the fractures involving posteromedial plane.
At present, we can choose either medial or posteromedial approach to explore the site of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures, but either of them has its limited visualization of the articular surface of the medial plateau . Especially in the fractures involving posteromedial plane, the two approaches are often unable to achieve the sufficient reduction because of the limitation of visualization, and the meniscus cannot be elevated through the approaches if the meniscus is trapped in the fracture line. The type of the fracture is not uncommon. Yang et al. reported the fractures involving posteromedial plane accounted for 42.7% of Schatzker type IV fractures .
Therefore, in order to solve the limitation of visualization, we added a lateral peripatellar approach as viewing window to aid in congruent joint reduction. To our best knowledge, no study about the combination of lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches in the treatment of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane has been reported. In the following report, we shared with our successful experience in the management of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane through the combination of lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches.
Between January 2015 and January 2016, 42 patients with Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures were treated in our institution. All the operations were performed by the same orthopaedic surgeon. The inclusion criteria were: (1) the fractures involved posteromedial plane; (2) Patients of age of 18 years or more; (3) The injured knee joint was normal before injury. The exclusion criteria were: (1) Open or pathological fractures; (2) a history of knee surgery; (3) Fractures complicated by serious nerve or vascular injury. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 patients were included in our study. Our study was approved by the Chinese PLA General Hospital committee for clinical research and informed consent was obtained from the 18 patients.
There were 12 males and 6 females with an average of 38.5 years (range, 25–60 years). The mechanism of injury included traffic accident in 15 patients and falling in 3 patients. The injured lower limbs were right in 11 patients and left in 7 patients. The mean time from injury to surgery was 6.78 days (range, 5–9 days). There were 8 patients with lateral meniscus injuries in our study. More details listed in Table 1.
The patient was positioned supine on a radiolucent table under intratracheal general anesthesia. A pneumatic tourniquet was applied to the proximal thigh. Posteromedial approach was performed firstly [6,7,8]. A longitudinal incision was made along the posteromedial aspect of the tibia. The saphenous nerve and the great saphenous vein should be protected during exposure. Then the dissection was performed between the semitendinosus muscle and the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle in order to explore the pes anserinus tendon. The fracture line usually existed at the level of pes anserinus tendon at the metaphysis. The pes anserinus tendon was cut off along the incision of skin, and it was marked in order to repair it after the surgery. During the course of cutting off the pes anserinus, we should pay more attention in the protection of MCL (medial collateral ligament, MCL). When the site of fracture was exposed, the lateral peripatellar approach as viewing window was performed to aid in congruent joint reduction. The small incision (About 4-5 cm) was made along the lateral peripatellar (The distance between the two skin incisions should be more than 7 cm as the Fig. 1 showed), and then peripatellar retinaculum was incised. The patella and ligamentum patellae were pulled medially so that we could visualize the injured articular surface directly. If the meniscus is trapped in the fracture line, we can detect its injury severity and make its repair through the lateral peripatellar approach. When the anatomical reduction of the articular fracture was achieved, a medial buttress plate and a posterior plate were used at the apex of the fracture. Incisions were then closed over suction drains.
A knee plaster was performed, if the patient had an associated injury of ligament. Dressings were changed in 48 h and drainage tubes were pulled out 48 or 72 h after the surgery. Soft tissues were closely monitored in 48 h in order to avoid the compartment syndrome. The passive range-of-motion exercise was started at the first day after the operation. The full activity of knee was finished in 4–6 weeks after the surgery and progressive weight-bearing was started at 10–12 weeks after the operation.
Evaluation of outcome
Operation time, blood loss, bone union time, and the degrees of knee extension and flexion were indices of the outcome. The final clinical outcomes of knee were evaluated by Knee Society Score (KSS) [9, 10]. The outcomes were categorized as excellent (80–100 points), good (70–79 points), fair (60–69 points), or poor (< 60 points).
The mean operation time was 3.41 h (range, 3–4 h). The mean blood loss was 352.78 ml (range, 300–410 ml). All the injured meniscuses were repaired. All patients were followed up, and the average time of follow up was 16.61 months (range, 14–22 months). All patients underwent anteroposterior and lateral knee X-ray examination at one month, three months and six months after operation. Bone union was achieved at a mean of 12 weeks (range, 10–14 weeks). The mean degree of knee extension was 1.11° (range, 0–5°), and the mean degree of knee flexion was 120.56° (range, 110–130°). The mean points of KSS were 83 (range, 74–89 points). According to the criteria of KSS, 14 patients had clinical outcomes rated as excellent and 4 patients were rated as good (Fig. 2). More details listed in Table 2. There were no serious complications in our study. One patient had transient palsy of saphenous nerve (Case 4), and he was recovered completely at 10 weeks after surgery. One patient had superficial wound infection (Case 8), and she was cured by oral antibiotics.
This is the first prospective study of combined lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches in the treatment of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane. The present study showed that the approach acquired satisfying clinical outcomes. All patients had clinical outcomes rated as excellent or good. The motion ranges of the knee joint were nearly normal levels. All patients achieved bone union on time.
The main goals in the treatment of tibia plateau fractures include anatomic reduction of articular surface, maintenance of normal knee alignment, provision of knee stability and restoration of a painless range of motion and function [4, 11,12,13]. Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane remain difficult, because they usually accompany with meniscus and ligaments injuries. Two approaches have been applied to expose the type of fracture. However, either of them has its limitations. The medial approach with a medial parapatellar hasn’t given an adequate exposure of medial plateau, and it is very difficult to fix the posteromedial fragment if we don’t make an extensive dissection of the soft tissue. The posteromedial approach allows an wider exposure of posteromedial fragment for the fixation of the buttress plate [14,15,16]. However, it is unable to elevate and repair the lateral meniscus that trapped in the fracture line due to the limited visualization. Stannard et al. reported that there was a 49% meniscus injury during high-energy tibial plateau fractures, and the incidence of lateral meniscus injury was more than medial meniscus injury . Barrow et al. reported the incidence of meniscus injury was 25% in Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures of their study . Therefore, in order to solve the limitation of the two approaches, we designed the combined lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches. It could not only aid in the anatomic reduction of articular surface, but also repair the injured meniscus.
The incidence of injured meniscus was 44.44% (8/18) in our study. We repaired all the injured meniscuses when we achieved the adequate fixation of the fracture by dual plates. We believed that it was very important to repair these injured meniscuses, because they could allow patients to perform the early functional exercises and be beneficial to restore the normal ranges of knee motion. There were no serious complications in our study. Only 5.56% (1/18) patients had transient palsy of saphenous nerve and 5.56% (1/18) patients had superficial wound infection, and finally they were all cured. We thought we could overcome these complications as long as we pay more attention to them. The main advantage of our approach was that it could overcome the limited visualization to aid in the anatomic reduction of articular surface and repair associated injured menisci at the same time. Especially in the case of failure of restoring the width of plateau through the medial or posteromedial approach (Fig. 3), we should consider if the injured meniscus is trapped in the fracture line or not and add a lateral peripatellar approach as viewing window to aid in congruent joint reduction. However, the view of medial tibial plateau through the lateral window is very limited for the middle and posterior third of the medial meniscus.
In our experience, some important aspects should be paid. (1) We should evaluate carefully the fracture and the soft tissue envelope based on specific conditions of the patient. Handing the soft tissue properly in this region is critical to successful treatment. (2) Computed tomography (CT) is necessary before the operation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended, because it can provide information with regard to associated meniscus and ligaments injuries that may affect the treatment plan. (3) We should try our best to repair the injured meniscuses. There are two types of fracture combined with cruciate ligament injury. The first is the avulsion of cruciate ligament. Ligament’s bony avulsions should be repaired at the time of the internal fixation, acutely, thus promoting better prognosis due to direct bone to bone healing. The second is the rupture of the cruciate ligament. We should repair it through arthroscopy after the healing of fracture. As for MCL (medial collateral ligament, MCL) or LCL (lateral collateral ligament, LCL) injury, we also shouldn’t add an additional to repair the injured MCL or LCL, and we need add a knee plaster to protect the injured ligaments, because MCL or LCL damage is often incomplete. (4) In our approaches, the distance between the two skin incisions should be more than 7 cm in order to avoid the necrosis of the skin. (5) The incision of the lateral peripatellar approach should be small, because it just is a viewing window to aid in the treatment of the fracture.
The main strength of our study is that all the operations were performed by the same orthopaedic surgeon, and it can avoid the differences caused by different surgeons’ preference and experience. The type of the study is prospective. However, there are some limitations. The number of patients is relatively small, and control group isn’t included in our study. Therefore, the potential biased on our outcomes may be exist, and more patients need to be included in the future study to verify the effectiveness of this procedure and overcome the limitations of our current outcomes.
In conclusion, our study suggested that combined lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches in the treatment of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane acquired satisfying outcomes. It was good for repairing the injured meniscus through our approaches.
Availability of data and materials
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. All data and materials were in full compliance with the journal’s policy.
Yang G, Zhu Y, Luo C, Putnis S. Morphological characteristics of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures: a computer tomography based study. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2355–60.
Khatri K, Sharma V, Goyal D, Farooque K. Complications in the management of closed high-energy proximal tibial plateau fractures. Chin J Traumatol. 2016;6:342–7.
Stannard J. Fracture dislocation of the knee. J Knee Surg. 2016;4:300–2.
Giordano V, do Amaral NP, Koch HA. Outcome evaluation of staged treatment for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2017;17:S34–40.
Jason A, Lowe NT, Yoo B, Wolinsky P. Surgical techniques for complex proximal Tibial fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;61:1547–59.
Kandemir U, Maclean J. Surgical approaches for tibial plateau fractures. J Knee Surg. 2014;27:21–9.
Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Boraiah S, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Posteromedial supine approach for reduction and fixation of medial and bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:357–62.
Yuan GH, Zheng X, Chen K. Combined surgical approaches in the treatment of complex tibial plateau fractures. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017;1:89–92.
Asif S, Choon DS. Midterm results of cemented Press Fit Condylar Sigma total knee arthroplasty system. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005;13:280–4.
Pätzold R, Friederichs J, von Rüden C. The pivotal role of the coronal fracture line for a new three-dimensional CT-based fracture classification of bicondylar proximal tibial fractures. Injury. 2017;48:2214–20.
Zeng ZM, Luo CF, Putnis S, Zeng BF. Biomechanical analysis of posteromedial tibial plateau split fracture fixation. Knee. 2011;18:51–4.
Piątkowski K, Kwiatkowski K. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of Tibial plateau fractures and computed tomography examinations. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2015;17:135–45.
Subasi M, Kapukaya A, Arslan H, Ozkul E, Cebesoy O. Outcome of open comminuted tibial plateau fractures treated using an external fixator. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12:347–53.
Potocnik P, Acklin YP, Sommer C. Operative strategy in postero-medial fracture-dislocation of the proximal tibia. Injury. 2011;42:1060–5.
Fakler JK, Ryzewicz M, Hartshorn C, Morgan SJ, Stahel PF, Smith WR. Optimizing the management of Moore type I postero-medial split fracture dislocations of the tibial head: description of the Lobenhoffer approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:330–6.
Barei DP, O'Mara TJ, Taitsman LA, Dunbar RP, Nork SE. Frequency and fracture morphology of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fracture patterns. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:176–82.
Stannard JP, Lopez R, Volgas D. Soft tissue injury of the knee after tibial plateau fractures. J Knee Surg. 2010;23:187–92.
Zakrzewski P, Orłowski J. Meniscuses and ligaments injuries in tibial plateau fractures in comparative evaluation of clinical, intraoperative and MR examination. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2005;70:109–13.
The authors thank Dr. P. Y and J. Z for their help with the novel ideas in this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethical Review Boards of the Chinese PLA General Hospital committee (Beijing, China), and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964. All participants provided informed consent before their participation in the study and written were obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
All patients included into the study provided their informed consent at enrolment and the use of patients’ data for research.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Yin, B., Zhao, J. et al. Combined lateral peripatellar and posteromedial approaches for Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial plane: a prospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21, 229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03274-6
- Lateral peripatellar
- Tibial plateau