Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Effect of intensive inpatient physical therapy on whole-body indefinite symptoms in patients with whiplash-associated disorders

  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201920:251

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2621-1

  • Received: 1 January 2019
  • Accepted: 10 May 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

A considerable number of patients with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) report variable and indefinite symptoms involving the whole body, despite there being no evidence of direct injuries to organs other than the neck. However, little is known about their management or underlying mechanism. This study examined the effect of intensive physical therapy at the cervical muscles in patients with WAD reporting whole-body indefinite symptoms.

Methods

A total of 194 hospitalized patients with WAD who were resistant to outpatient care by reporting whole-body indefinite symptoms between May 2006 and May 2017 were enrolled in this observational study. All patients underwent daily physical therapies by low-frequency electric stimulation therapy and far-infrared irradiation to the cervical muscles during hospitalization. Self-rated records in the medical interview sheets on 22 representative whole-body symptoms at admission and discharge were compared.

Results

The number of symptoms was markedly decreased by the physical therapies during hospitalization. Almost all symptoms showed recovery rates of more than 80% at discharge as compared to those at admission. Although the percentage of patients reporting at least four of the 22 representative indefinite symptoms was 99.0% at admission, it decreased to 7.7% at discharge. Sixteen percent of patients recovered completely without any residual symptoms. The mean number of symptoms significantly decreased from 13.1 at admission to 2.0 at discharge. Notably, symptoms other than those in the neck or shoulder recovered to a greater extent than those in the neck or shoulder.

Conclusions

This study, for the first time, examined the management of whole-body indefinite symptoms in patients with WAD. The intensive physical therapy markedly improved the symptoms, suggesting the involvement of cervical muscles in the pathogenesis.

Trial registration

UMIN000035435 (Retrospectively registered on Jan 3, 2019).

Keywords

  • Whiplash injuries
  • Neck muscles
  • Therapy
  • Electric stimulation

Background

Whiplash neck injury, which commonly occurs in motor vehicle accidents, causes acute and chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) [13]. Its cumulative annual incidence is reported to be more than 300/100,000 people [4]. The Quebec Task Force defined whiplash neck injury as an injury caused by an acceleration-deceleration mechanism of energy transfer to the neck [5]. The energy may impact and cause injury to various components of the neck including bones, intervertebral discs, facet joints, spinal cord, nerve roots, and cervical muscles [57]. Mostly, however, the mechanical stress on the neck from motor vehicle accidents is not so strong or severe enough to injure bones, intervertebral discs, facet joints, spinal cord, or nerve roots, although it may cause functional disorders like cramps or spasms of cervical muscles [4, 8]. Hence, pain or stiffness of the neck or shoulder, the local and main symptom caused by nociceptive mechanical stimulus of the muscles, usually recovers within two to three weeks following the injury by conventional outpatient care, such as medication or neck rest [1, 8]. Alternatively, up to 30–50% of patients with WAD report variable and indefinite symptoms involving the whole body, despite there being no evidence of direct injury to organs other than the neck [14, 9, 10]. The reported whole-body indefinite symptoms include headache, vertigo or dizziness, palpitation, chest tightness, vision loss, dazzling, dry eyes, dry mouth, nausea or appetite loss, gastrointestinal symptoms (stomachache, diarrhea, and constipation), hyperhidrosis, cold sensation or poor circulation, unstable blood pressure, unknown fever, sleeping disorder, general malaise or fatigue, depression, distraction or obsession, irritability, and lack of endurance.

Treatment for patients with WAD remains controversial. A review reports that some active treatments, although not specified, have a tendency to be more effective than only resting of the neck [11]. Several reports have shown that pharmacological interventions such as paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids have slight or moderate effects [12, 13]. However, these studies are limited to the management of local pain in the neck or shoulder, performed as outpatient care for acute WAD. The management of other whole-body indefinite symptoms or intensive treatment by hospitalization has not been extensively examined.

We have previously reported that cervical muscle disorders may possibly be associated with these indefinite and variable symptoms and propose a new medical concept, namely cervical neuro-muscular syndrome [14]. On the basis of our clinical experience, we believe that functional disorders in cervical muscles, such as cramps or spasms after injury, are responsible not only for neck and shoulder symptoms but also for other whole-body symptoms of WAD. On palpation of 34 points of the neck, which is the original diagnostic method used at our institutions (Additional file 2: Figure S1), we observed that patients with WAD exhibit tenderness and hardening at specific sites of the posterior and lateral cervical muscles, such as trapezius, semispinalis capitis, splenius capitis, and sternocleidomastoid. These muscle lesions cannot be diagnosed using images such as plain radiographs or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the treatment, we attempted prescribing medication or neck rest with a cervical collar for functional disorders of the cervical muscles as outpatient care. Although these were partly effective for local symptoms of the neck or shoulder, they were hardly effective for other symptoms in the whole body.

Among the many interventions for local modulation of the cervical muscles, low-frequency electric stimulation has recently been reported to be effective for recovery of muscle tone of the erector spinae [15, 16]. In addition, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study has shown that far-infrared irradiation significantly decreased the stiffness of cervical muscles [17]. We also believe that a combination of the two physical therapies can decrease tenderness and hardening of the cervical muscles much more effectively than conventional treatments, through the aforementioned palpation of the neck. The present study therefore examined the effect of a combination of the two physical therapies at the cervical muscles of inpatients with WAD who were resistant to outpatient care and showed variable symptoms in the whole body.

Methods

Study design

This study is an observational study.

Patients

Among patients who visited our institutions with whiplash neck injuries due to motor vehicle accidents between May 2006 and May 2017, a considerable number of patients reported one or more indefinite symptoms in the whole body besides neck or shoulder symptoms. All underwent conventional outpatient care, such as medication and neck rest using a cervical collar. Outpatient care does not include physical therapies at the cervical muscles. This is because the outpatient facilities at our institutions, like that at most of hospitals in Japan, do not have equipment for physical therapies, whereas inpatient facilities do.

There was no definite criterion for hospitalization of the patients. In principle, hospitalization was decided through consensus between the patients and physicians, independently of the severity or frequency of the symptoms and the presence of neurological disorder or psychological distress. The main reason for hospitalization is resistance to outpatient care because of persistent indefinite symptoms involving the whole body that need not only more intensive treatments but also detailed examination in other organs. Patients with a history of any of the aforementioned symptoms before the motor vehicle accident were excluded. To avoid the effects of musculoskeletal and neuromuscular dysfunctions due to congenital or degenerative disorders apart from whiplash injury, those with cervical spondylosis, disk degeneration or herniation, ligament ossification, spinal deformity or scoliosis on plain radiographs and MRI, and those with neurologic deficits in the extremities on examination at admission, were also excluded. Self-rated medical interview sheets to evaluate the whole-body symptoms (Additional file 2: Figure S2) were collected at admission and discharge.

In total, 211 patients who were resistant to outpatient care for 14 to 61 days (27.2 days on average) and hospitalized at our institutions were enrolled in this observational study. Among these patients, 17 were excluded after enrollment: six patients were diagnosed with specific diseases in other organs after admission, four patients received pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments in addition to physical therapies at their insistence, four patients discharged themselves from the hospital for unknown reasons, two patients quit physical therapy because of skin disorders that were judged as therapy-related by physicians, and one patient refused to leave the hospital independent of the presence of symptoms even after 90 days. After excluding these patients, 194 patients, with a mean age of 45.6 years, including 82 men (45.4 years) and 112 women (45.7 years) met the aforementioned criteria (Table 1). Time after the whiplash injury at admission was 14 to 89 days (36.6 days on average). The period of hospitalization from admission to discharge was 11 to 88 days (46.1 days on average). None of the patients underwent re-hospitalization because of aggravation of the symptoms until their last visit to our institutions (0 to 54 days; 18.3 days on average, after discharge).
Table 1

Patient backgrounds

Age

Gender

Number (percentage) of patients

10–19

Male

0 (0)

Female

4 (2.1)

20–29

Male

7 (3.6)

Female

14 (7.2)

30–39

Male

26 (13.4)

Female

25 (12.9)

40–49

Male

19 (9.8)

Female

27 (13.9)

50–59

Male

13 (6.7)

Female

18 (9.3)

60–69

Male

11 (5.7)

Female

13 (6.7)

70–79

Male

6 (3.1)

Female

9 (4.6)

80–89

Male

0 (0)

Female

2 (1.0)

Total

 

194 (100.0)

Intervention

During hospitalization, the patients underwent physical therapies: low-frequency electric stimulation therapy and far-infrared irradiation at the cervical muscles for 15 min twice daily (Fig. 1A). None of the other treatments including medication, injection, external fixation, or cervical traction were administered. A combination of silver spike point (SSP; Nihon Medix, Chiba, Japan) and pain topra (LCF-30; Celcom, Inc., Fukuoka, Japan) were used for low-frequency electrical therapy. Ten and four sites were stimulated by SSP and pain topra, respectively (Fig. 1B). CERAPIA 3300 (Nihon Medix, Chiba, Japan) was used for far-infrared ray irradiation to the entire neck.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a A scene photograph of treatment with low-frequency electric stimulation with silver spike point (SSP) and pain topra, combined with far-infrared irradiation (FIR). b A representative example of SSP (blue circle) and pain topra (red circle) stimulation sites (ten and two, respectively). As most patients report headache and pain or stiffness in the neck and shoulder, both stimulations are performed at the semispinalis capitis muscle with the greater occipital nerve (CP sites in Additional file 2: Figure S1) and the trapezius and splenius capitis muscles (C and P sites, respectively, in Additional file 2: Figure S1)

Sites of low-frequency electric stimulations were determined on the basis of hardness and tenderness of 34 points of the neck upon palpation by eight physicians at our institutions (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Although neither the inter-rater nor intra-rater reliability of our palpation technique was tested, this original technique has meticulously been unified and made consistent among physicians according to the strict and frequent orientation by Dr. Matsui, who is the pioneer of this method [14]. For example, the semispinalis capitis muscle with the greater occipital nerve (CP sites in Additional file 2: Figure S1) was stimulated in patients with headache. The trapezius and splenius capitis muscles (C and P sites, respectively, in Additional file 2: Figure S1) were stimulated in patients with pain or stiffness of the neck and shoulder (Fig. 1b).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 J for Windows. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant; all reported P values were two-sided. As the sample size (n = 194) is large enough (> 30 or 40), the central limit theorem can be applied to clarify that the data are normally distributed and violation of the normality assumption should not cause major problems [18]. Hence, the paired Student’s t-test was used to examine the difference in the number of symptoms between admission and discharge. The difference in the number of patients with each symptom between admission and discharge was evaluated using the chi-square test, whereas Fisher’s exact test was used for symptoms for which the number of patients was five or fewer at discharge.

Results

The number of patients with the 22 representative symptoms involving the whole body at admission and discharge is shown in Table 2. At admission, more than 70% of patients reported headache, cold sensation or poor circulation, sleeping disorders, and general malaise or fatigue, apart from the local symptoms in the neck or shoulder. More than 50% reported vertigo or dizziness, vision loss, nausea or appetite loss, gastrointestinal symptoms (stomachache, diarrhea, or constipation), hyperhidrosis, depression, distraction or obsession, irritability, and lack of endurance. In addition, more than 30% of patients reported palpitation, chest tightness, dazzling, dry eyes, and dry mouth. At discharge, however, all indefinite symptoms except for sleeping disorder showed recovery rates higher than 80%. Headache, vertigo or dizziness, dry mouth, gastrointestinal symptoms (stomachache, diarrhea or constipation), hyperhidrosis, and sleeping disorder were significantly improved at discharge (P < 0.05). Notably, all patients (100%) with depression, distraction or obsession at admission recovered at discharge. More interestingly, pain or stiffness in the neck or shoulder, which are thought to be the main symptoms of WAD, showed the lowest recovery rate (50–60%).
Table 2

The numbers (percentages) of patients with the representative 22 symptoms at admission and discharge, and recovery rates

Symptom

Number (percentage) of patientsat admission (Total = 194)

Number (percentage) of patients at discharge (Total = 194)

Recovery rate

P-value

Headache

170 (87.6)

31 (16.0)

81.8

0.022

Neck pain or stiffness

186 (95.9)

85 (43.8)

54.3

0.273

Shoulder pain or stiffness

185 (95.4)

76 (39.2)

58.9

0.077

Vertigo or dizziness

123 (63.4)

17 (8.8)

86.2

0.006

Palpitation

81 (41.8)

4 (2.1)

95.1

0.198

Chest tightness

63 (34.5)

7 (3.6)

89.6

0.188

Vision loss

114 (58.8)

5 (2.6)

95.6

0.664

Dazzling

95 (49.0)

4 (2.1)

95.8

0.056

Dry eyes

88 (45.4)

5 (2.6)

94.3

0.132

Dry mouth

71 (36.6)

7 (3.6)

90.1

0.010

Nausea or appetite loss

107 (55.2)

3 (1.5)

97.2

0.577

Stomachache, diarrhea, or constipation

115 (59.3)

17 (8.8)

85.2

0.011

Hyperhidrosis

104 (53.6)

17 (8.8)

83.7

< 0.0001

Cold sensation or poor circulation

141 (72.7)

26 (13.4)

81.6

0.052

Unstable blood pressure

45 (23.2)

3 (1.5)

93.3

0.135

Unknown fever

48 (24.7)

5 (2.6)

89.6

0.237

Sleeping disorder

147 (75.8)

37 (19.1)

74.8

0.011

General malaise or fatigue

175 (90.2)

18 (9.3)

89.7

0.840

Depression

126 (64.9)

0 (0)

100.0

Distraction or obsession

99 (51.0)

0 (0)

100.0

Irritability

119 (61.3)

1 (0.5)

99.2

0.613

Lack of endurance

126 (64.9)

5 (2.6)

96.0

0.112

The P-value for difference in symptoms between admission and discharge was evaluated using the chi-square test, while Fisher’s exact test was used when the number of patients was ≤5 at discharge

The number of patients and their respective numbers of symptoms at admission and discharge are shown in Fig. 2, and they reveal a remarkable decrease in the number of symptoms during the hospitalization. Overall, 99.0% of the patients reported at least 4 symptoms at admission; however, this decreased to 7.7% at discharge (Table 3). Sixteen percent of patients completely recovered without any remaining symptoms. The number of symptoms present at admission were significantly decreased compared to that at discharge (13.1 ± 4.1 [mean ± standard deviation] versus 2.0 ± 1.4; P < 0.0001).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Numbers of patients with their respective number of symptoms at admission (red bars) and discharge (blue bars)

Table 3

Proportion of patients with their respective number of symptoms at admission and discharge

Number of symptoms

0

1

2

3

≥4

Total

Number (percentage) of patients at admission

0

0

2 (1.0)

0 (0)

192 (99.0)

194 (100.0)

Number (percentage) of patients at discharge

31 (16.0)

38 (19.6)

55 (28.4)

55 (28.4)

15 (7.7)

15 (7.7)

Discussion

This study, for the first time, examined the management of whole-body indefinite symptoms in patients with WAD, and found that the intensive physical therapy at the cervical muscles markedly improved the symptoms. With regard to the underlying mechanism, possible involvement of the autonomic nervous system has been proposed [19]. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction has recently been reported to play a role in painful musculoskeletal conditions such as chronic low back pain [20], fibromyalgia [21], and brachialgia [22]. The autonomic nervous system, which is responsible for regulating unconscious actions, consists of parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems. Because of its anatomical location, the parasympathetic system is referred to as having a craniosacral outflow, whereas the sympathetic nervous system has a thoracolumbar outflow. The parasympathetic system predominates during rest conditions, controlling miosis, lacrimation, salivation, pulsation, sweating, digestion, defecation, and peripheral circulation. Hence, the whole-body symptoms in WAD might possibly be related to dysfunction of the parasympathetic nerve that passes through cervical muscles. We assume that physical compression of the parasympathetic nerve caused by cervical muscle cramps or spasms may lead to the whole-body symptoms. However, considering that pain or stiffness in the neck or shoulder showed the lowest recovery rate by the physical therapies (Table 2), other mechanisms independent of the modulation of cervical muscles cannot be denied. In fact, the physical therapies used in this study: low-frequency electric stimulation and far-infrared irradiation, are reported to modulate not only muscle tone and stiffness [1517] but also nerve regeneration and repair directly [2325]. Therefore, a major limitation of this study is the lack of a detailed evaluation of muscle tone and stiffness before and after the intervention. Although we believe that the tenderness and hardening of cervical muscles significantly improved during hospitalization on palpation of the neck, a routine diagnostic method at our institutions (Additional file 2: Figure S1), objective or more reliable subjective tools are needed to examine the severity of cervical muscle functional disorders. For example, ultrasound elastography, which has been used in oncology to detect malignant lesions in soft tissues, is now applied to measure the mechanical properties of muscle in patients with multiple sclerosis spasticity [26]. We are now performing a prospective study in patients with various cervical disorders to measure the hardness and stiffness of cervical muscles using shear-wave elastography, a representative ultrasound elastography technique [27].

Another major limitation of the present study is that this is an observational study. In other words, this study lacks a control group that did not undergo physical therapies during hospitalization. Although the present inpatient population did not receive any other active treatments, the possibility that various symptoms improved merely by resting during hospitalization cannot be denied. Initially, this project was planned as a prospective randomized controlled trial; however, neither the authorities of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (presently called Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency) nor the IRB gave us permission to set up a control group because of ethical problems; only resting without any active intervention for hospitalized patients was not allowed. However, the inpatients enrolled in this study had already undergone conventional outpatient care, including neck rest with a cervical collar except local physical therapies for 14 to 61 days (27.2 days on average) before the hospitalization, but were resistant to care. As shown in Additional file 1: Table S1, which shows a comparison of the proportion of patients with the 22 representative symptoms between the first visit (n = 139) and admission (n = 194), the percentages of patients with symptoms other than those in the neck or shoulder did not decrease but increased during outpatient care, including resting neck rest. Therefore, it seems improbable that all symptoms recovered to such a drastic extent only by resting, even in the hospital.

There are many confounding factors to be considered in this study. Especially, psychological distress is a common problem following a whiplash injury and may play a key role in chronicity of the symptoms and even the recovery rate [28, 29]. Actually, in this study, more than a half of the patients reported psychological symptoms such as sleeping disorder, general malaise or fatigue, depression, distraction or obsession, irritability, and lack of endurance at admission (Table 2). Although these psychological symptoms showed recovery rates more than 70% at discharge, these cannot be explained only by parasympathetic system dysfunction. Meanwhile, it is known that a significant proportion of patients with WAD are also diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and patients with PTSD show autonomic nervous system dysfunction [30]. Further, it is true that many physicians have a perception that psychological aspects associated with compensation may be linked to whole-body indefinite symptoms. In contrast, these symptoms might be secondary to various and indefinite disorders. Therefore, whether these psychological symptoms are causes or consequences of indefinite symptoms of WAD is still controversial. Evaluation of the psychological conditions of patients in more detail will be needed as a routine practice.

The economic impact of medical interventions should be considered with increasing health care expenditures and limited resources. The inpatient physical therapy performed in this study, twice daily for an average of 46 days, is a costly treatment for both health care providers and individuals. Costs associated with WAD are estimated to be approximately US $4 billion per year in the UK, which are attributed to the health service as well as the long term disability of the patients [31]. Although a recent review of the literature failed to find any cost-effectiveness evaluations of treatments for WAD [32], feasibility of the present costly treatment as a therapeutic choice may be questionable. Development of more simple and feasible treatments that can be performed even in outpatient care or at home, such as a portable device for the physical therapy, will be the next task ahead of us.

Conclusions

This study for the first time examined the management of whole-body indefinite symptoms in patients with WAD. Intensive physical therapies at the cervical muscles during hospitalization markedly improved these symptoms. Almost all the 22 representative symptoms showed recovery rates of greater than 80%. Although most patients reported at least four symptoms at admission, these decreased to less than 10%. Moreover, approximately one-sixth of the patients showed no symptoms at discharge. The mean number of symptoms was significantly decreased from 13.1 at admission to 2.0 at discharge. Interestingly, symptoms other than those in the neck or shoulder recovered to a greater extent than did those in the neck or shoulder. This suggests that the whole-body indefinite symptoms in WAD may be derived from local disorders in the cervical muscles, possibly via parasympathetic nerve dysfunction.

Abbreviations

FIR: 

Far-infrared irradiation

IRB: 

Institutional review board

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

NSAIDs: 

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

SSP: 

Silver spike point

WAD: 

Whiplash-associated disorders

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Noriko Yoshimura at the 22nd Century Medical and Research Center of the University of Tokyo for fruitful discussion on statistics. We also thank Mrs. Hiroki Fujii, Tomohiko Kaneko, and Naoto Yanagi at our institutions for invaluable technical assistance.

Funding

There was no funding associated with this study. The patients were hospitalized for intensive treatment and detailed examination, but not for this study. The cost of treatment was borne partly by the patients and partly by the Japanese national insurance.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author’s contributions

TM conceived the idea and conception of the performed study. Initiation of the study was done by TM, MI, YE, NS, and HK. TM and HK conducted the ethical approval. Data acquisition was performed by TM, MI, YE, NS, SH, HF, and HK. Data interpretation were carried out by TM, KH, and HK. TM and HK performed the statistical analysis. TM and HK were responsible for writing the initial manuscript. Figure design was undertaken by TM and HK. Proofreading was carried out by all authors. All authors gave approval of the submitted version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted with the approval of the institutional review board (IRB) of Tokyo Neurological Center and Matsui Hospital. All participants signed written consent to participate in the study. All rights of the patients were protected against any kind of disadvantage and individual matters.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Head of Orthopaedics and Spine Department, Tokyo Neurological Center, Toranomon 4-1-17, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan
(2)
Department of Neurosurgery, Matsui Hospital, Kan-nonji 739, Kagawa 768-0013, Japan

References

  1. McClune T, Burton AK, Waddell G. Whiplash-associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice. Emerg Med J. 2002;19:499–506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Elliott JM, Noteboom JT, Flynn TW, Sterling M. Characterization of acute and chronic whiplash-associated disorders. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:312–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sterling M. Whiplash-associated disorder: musculoskeletal pain and related clinical findings. J Man Manip Ther. 2011;19:194–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Côté P, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, Haldeman S, Nordin M, Hurwitz EL, Guzman J, Peloso PM. The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the bone and joint decade 2000-2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine. 2008;33(4 Suppl):S60–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gurumoorthy D, Twomey L. The Quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders. Spine (Phila pa 1976). 1996;21:897–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaneoka K, Ono K, Inami S, Hayashi K. Motion analysis of cervical vertebrae during whiplash loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:763–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnston V, Jimmieson NL, Jull G, Souvlis T. Quantitative sensory measures distinguish office workers with varying levels of neck pain and disability. Pain. 2008;137:257–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pastakia K, Kumar S. Acute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Open Access Emerg Med. 2011;3:29–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rebbeck T, Sindhausen D, Cameron ID, Rubin G, Feyer AM, Walsh J Gold M, Schofield WN. A prospective cohort study of health outcomes following whiplash-associated disorders in an Australian population. Inj Prev. 2006;12:93–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Sterling M, Jull G, Kenardy J. Physical and psychological predictors of outcome following whiplash injury maintain predictive capacity at long term follow-up. Pain. 2006;122:102–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Peeters GG, Verhagen AP, de Bie RA, Oostendorp RA. The efficacy of conservative treatment in patients with whiplash injury: a systematic review of clinical trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:E64–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nikles J, Yelland M, Bayram C, Miller G, Sterling M. Management of whiplash-associated disorders in Australian general practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:551–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Curatolo M. Pharmacological and interventional management of pain after whiplash injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46:845–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Matsui T, Ii K, Hojo S, Sano K. Cervical neuro-muscular syndrome:discovery of a new disease group caused by abnormalities in the cervical muscles. Neurol Med Chir. 2012;52:75–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang DH, Jeon JK, Lee JH. Effects of low-frequency electric stimulation on cumulative fatigue and muscle tone of the erector spinae. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:105–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Maneski LZ, Malešević NM, Savić AM, Keller T, Popović DB. Surface-distributed low-frequency asynchronous stimulation delays fatigue of stimulated muscles. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48:930–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lai CH, Leung TK, Peng CW, Chang KH, Lai MJ, Lai WF, Chen SC. Effects of far-infrared irradiation on myofascial neck pain:a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20:123–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;10:486–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Passatore M, Roatta S. Influence of sympathetic nervous system on sensorimotor function: whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) as a model. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;98:423–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gockel M, Lindholm H, Niemisto L, Hurri H. Perceived disability but not pain is connected with autonomic nervous system function among people with chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:355–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Martinez-Lavin M. Biology and therapy of fibromyalgia. Stress, the stress response system, and fibromyalgia. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:216–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Greening J, Lynn B, Leary R. Sensory and autonomic function in the hands of patients with non-specific arm pain (NSAP) and asymptomatic office workers. Pain. 2003;104:275–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordon T. Electrical stimulation to enhance axon regeneration after peripheral nerve injuries in animal models and humans. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13:295–310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang JL, Lin YC, Young TH, Chen MH. Far-infrared ray radiation promotes neurite outgrowth of neuron-like PC12 cells through AKT1 signaling. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118:600–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen TY, Yang YC, Sha YN, Chou JR, Liu BS. Far-infrared therapy promotes nerve repair following end-to-end neurorrhaphy in rat models of sciatic nerve injury. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015; 207245.Google Scholar
  26. Illomei G. Muscle elastography in multiple sclerosis spasticity. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2016;6:13–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Paluch Ł, Noszczyk BH, Walecki J, Osiak K, Kiciński M, Pietruski P. Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of ulnar tunnel syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71:1593–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Treleaven J, Jull G, Sterling M. Dizziness and unsteadiness following whiplash injury: characteristic features and relationship with cervical joint position error. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:36–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Treleaven J, Jull G, LowChoy N. Smooth pursuit neck torsion test in whiplash-associated disorders: relationship to self-reports of neck pain and disability, dizziness and anxiety. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:219–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sterling M, Hendrikz J, Kenardy J. Similar factors predict disability and posttraumatic stress disorder trajectories after whiplash injury. Pain. 2011;152:1272–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Galasko G, Murray P, Stephenson W. Incidence of whiplash-associated disorder. BCMJ. 2002;44:237–40.Google Scholar
  32. van der Velde G, Yu H, Paulden M, Côté P, Varatharajan S, Shearer HM, Wong JJ, Randhawa K, Southerst D, Mior S, Sutton D, Jacobs C, Taylor-Vaisey A. Which interventions are cost effective for the management of whiplash-associated and neck pain associated disorders? A systematic review of the health economic literature by the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Spine J. 2016;16:1582–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement