Skip to main content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

The correlation between common 2D femoral notch parameters and 3D notch volume: a retrospective MRI study

Contributed equally
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201920:146

  • Received: 10 February 2019
  • Accepted: 26 March 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Although the stenotic femoral intercondylar notch was associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, the parameters for notch assessment were numerous. The present study aimed to compare the 2-dimensional (2D) femoral notch parameters, including the notch width (NW) and notch width index (NWI), with the 3-dimensional (3D) notch volume based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to determine appropriate femoral parameters for ACL injuries.


Two hundred forty individuals were included in this study, including 120 patients with ACL ruptures and 120 age- and gender-matched individuals without ACL ruptures. The NWs and NWIs were measured at four sites (the popliteal groove, the notch inlet and outlet, and the ACL attachment), and the notch volumes were calculated. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the 2D and 3D parameters were calculated. A multivariate analysis of the ACL injuries was conducted with these parameters and the demographic data.


The associations of the NW and NWI with the notch volume at each of the four locations of the femoral notch were poor in the subgroup analysis, with the exception of the NW in the male ACL-intact group (R = 0.307, 0.256, 0.404 and 0.387 at the popliteal groove, notch inlet and outlet, and ACL attachment, respectively). The multivariate analysis revealed that the notch volume (OR = 0.679, P < 0.001) and the NW at the popliteal groove (OR = 0.844, P = 0.004), notch inlet (OR = 0.720, P < 0.001) and ACL attachment (OR = 0.871, P = 0.028) were predictable parameters to the risk of ACL injuries.


The correlations between the 2D parameters and the 3D volumes were weak. The notch volume and the NW at the popliteal groove, notch inlet and ACL attachment were useful parameters for predicting the risk of ACL injuries.

Level of evidence

Level III, case-control study.


  • ACL injury
  • Femoral notch
  • Volume
  • Width
  • Magnetic resonance imaging


Decreased femoral intercondylar notch size is associated with an increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, as reported by numerous studies [1]. This phenomenon is mainly due to the ACL impinging on the lateral femoral condyle within a stenotic notch when receiving anterior shear forces or tibial rotation [24]. Some scholars have suggested that small femoral notches are associated with thin and weak ACLs, which means that ACL injuries can easily occur [57].

Currently, a large number of parameters are used for femoral notch size assessment, most of which are 2-dimensional (2D) notch parameters [1, 711] The notch width (NW), the width between the inner wall of the lateral femoral condyle and the outer wall of the medial femoral condyle as measured at the level of the popliteal groove are typical measurements, and the notch width index (NWI), the ratio of the NW to the bicondylar width, are most widely used in femoral notch size assessment. For more accurate assessment, the NW at different sites of the notch and corresponding NWI have been put forward. These measurements include the width at the notch inlet (NW_in), the width at the notch outlet (NW_ou), and the ACL attachment (NW_aa), etc. [12]. For many cases, the notch size can be efficiently evaluated by the NW and NWI [9, 13]. However, some other studies have presented the opposite results [9, 14]. One of the possible reasons for this discrepancy is that all of these 2D parameters can only denote the notch size of one location, which cannot adequately describe the 3-dimensional (3D) space.

The notch volume, which is a 3D notch parameter, describes the spatial dimensions of the femoral intercondylar notch and is an extension of the 2D parameters. Most studies, with the exception of one [13], have come to the conclusion that a smaller notch volume indicates a higher risk of ACL injury [8, 10, 11, 15]. However, due to the higher technical threshold and the more complicated measurement, the application of the notch volume measurement has been limited.

In this study, we researched the associations of the NW and NWI with the notch volume at four different locations (i.e., the popliteal groove, the notch inlet, the notch outlet, and the ACL attachment) of the femoral intercondylar notch in different groups (i.e., a male group, a female group, an ACL-injured group and an ACL-intact group). We attempted to confirm whether the common 2D notch parameters could be used to replace the 3D notch volumes in notch space assessment. Furthermore, the relationships of these parameters and non-contact ACL injuries were also assessed. We hypothesized that the typical 2D notch parameters could not represent the 3D notch volume, although most of these parameters could predict the risk of ACL injuries.


Sample size calculation, patient selection, and magnetic resonance images collected

The ethics of this retrospective case-control study were approved by our institutional research board. To determine the minimum number of participants required for our study, we performed a sample size calculation based on the results of van Eck et al. [9] (the Pearson correlation coefficient between the NW and notch volume was 0.551). To obtain a power of 0.99 (i.e., a β of 0.01) and an α of 0.01, we needed to include at least 53 participants in each group in the current study. We collected 240 participants in total (60 in each group) in this research, and the sample size reached the statistical requirement.

We have found a total of 4012 newly diagnosed knee MRIs for non-contact sport related injury in our hospital from June 2015 to July 2016 (Fig. 1). We recruited only adults aged 18–40 years old for the femoral intercondylar notch measurements in this study. To avoid racial bias, all of the participants were Han Chinese. Juveniles were excluded due to their open epiphyseal plates and potential age-related changes in the femoral notches [10]. Due to the potential osteophytosis of the femoral notch that is caused by degenerative changes with age, middle-aged and elderly individuals were excluded. ACL-deficient individuals with knees that were hurt over one year before the MRI was collected were ruled out [11] because their knees might have degenerated much sooner than the normal, and osteophytosis of the notch might have affected the measurements of the NW, NWI, and notch volume. Additionally, patients with knee MRIs without clear femoral ACL attachments were also excluded.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Flow chart of patient selection

We obtained 120 case-control pairs of individuals (60 males and 60 females) who were matched for gender and age. The demographic data (age, body height, and weight) were recorded. All of the ACL-injured patients (none of them with episodes of ACL injuries in bilateral knees) suffered first-time, sport-related, non-contact ACL injuries within one year. And the causes of their ACL injuries were listed in Table 1.To avoid false positive MRI results, all of the injuries were verified through ACL arthroscopy reconstruction surgeries. The patients with multiple ligament injuries or non-sport-related injuries were excluded to avoid evidence blurring. Those with contact ACL injuries were also ruled out because these injuries might have happened in high-energy impacts and been unrelated to any risk factors [16]. The ACL-intact group included individuals without any ligament injuries, such as synovitis, meniscus injuries, patellar tendinopathies or patellar dislocation. Those with knee injuries that were over one year old and those with previous operations were eliminated. Those with any diseases that might have altered the notch size were also excluded. These patients included those with knee degeneration, notch osteophytosis, and osteochondritis dissecans. All of the MRIs were obtained with the same MRI scanner machine (Siemens, Verio 3.0-T, slice thickness: 3.0 mm) in our hospital to avoid evident bias.
Table 1

The cause of non-contact ACL injuries in the research


Number of Cases

Number of Males

Number of Females





























Notch width and notch width index measurements

The coronal plane of the knee joint was selected for measurement. The NWs at the four locations (i.e., the popliteal groove, the femoral notch inlet and outlet, and the ACL attachment) were measured, and the corresponding NWI was calculated.

The measurements of the NW and NWI at the level of the popliteal groove were similar to those reported by van Eck et al. [9, 17]. The measurement slices were taken at the slice that exhibited a clear popliteal groove, and the reference line was marked as the distal tangent of the femoral condyles (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The coronal plane of the knee MRI shows the measurement of the NWs and the BW. 2A) AA” is the baseline, BB” is the BW at the level of the popliteal groove, CC” is the NW, and the NWI is equal to CC”/BB”. 2B) AA’ is the baseline, which is a proximal tangent of the lateral and medial femoral condyles. All the measurement of the notch width is in the same orientation as the baseline. BB’ is the NW at the notch inlet (NW_in), CC’ is the NW at the ACL attachment (NW_aa), DD’ is the NW at the notch outlet (NW_ou)

The measurements of the NW and NWI at the sites of the notch inlet, outlet, and ACL attachment were the same with those reported by Whitney et al. [12], which differed from the baseline selection of van Eck et al. The measurement plane was the coronal plane, which clearly displayed the notch inlet, outlet, and ACL attachment, and the reference line was marked as the proximal tangent of the femoral condyle (Fig. 2b).

All of the measurements were collected in the same manner by two experienced radiologists with the Tviews (WinningSoft, China) software, and the mean values were recorded.

Notch volume measurement

The technique for the notch volume measurement was similar to that previously described by Charlton et al. [14], which was previously used in the ACL volume measurements in a porcine model [18]. First, we selected sequential 2D axial slices that displayed the boundaries of the femoral notch. Second, we manually traced the edges based on the anatomic landmarks, and the 2D notch area was calculated by automatically the software (Fig. 3). Third, we calculated the notch volume by summing all of the 2D areas multiplied by the slice thickness.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The axial slice of the knee MRI shows the measurement of femoral intercondylar notch volume. The black curve traces the boundaries of the femoral notch. And the number beside the tracing place is the area calculated by the software itself

Statistical analysis

For all of the demographic data and notch data, the means, standard deviations, and standard errors were calculated. The inter-observer homogeneity of the notch parameter measurements was examined with Cronbach’s α. Bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlations between the 2D parameters (NW and NWI) and the 3D notch volume. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to display the independent effects of the NW, NWI, notch volume, age, body height, and weight on the ACL injuries. As the NW and NWI at the four sites might have been highly correlated, we examined only one of the eight relationships of the 2D notch parameters with the notch volume and demographic data in each of the multivariate logistic regressions, and we performed the multivariate logistic regressions eight times.


The number of individuals who were eligible according to the inclusion criteria was 240, and they were grouped according to gender and the presence of ACL injuries. The demographic data (age, height and weight), NW, NWI and notch volumes of the participants are displayed in Table 2, which includes the statistical results for the overall data and the subgroup data of the ACL-injured males, ACL-intact males, ACL-injured females and ACL-intact females.
Table 2

The demographic data and notch data of overall participants and subgroups



Male Group

Female Group


















Age (year)

29.78 ± 6.77

29.98 ± 5.94

28.94 ± 5.80

30.81 ± 6.76

28.15 ± 5.94

29.73 ± 5.58

31.4 ± 7.19

30.23 ± 6.30

Body Height (cm)

168.80 ± 8.68

168.32 ± 8.57

175.13 ± 5.32

162.00 ± 5.81

175.64 ± 4.79

174.62 ± 5.79

161.98 ± 5.84

162.02 ± 5.83

Body Weight (kg)

68.90 ± 14.77

68.26 ± 14.43

77.09 ± 12.41

60.07 ± 11.24

77.87 ± 12.14

76.31 ± 12.73

59.9 ± 11.35

60.21 ± 11.23

Time (month)a

3.37 ± 3.23

3.95 ± 3.68

2.79 ± 2.61

Notch Volume (cm3)

5.96 ± 1.38

6.84 ± 1.66

7.31 ± 1.58

5.49 ± 0.94

6.75 ± 1.30

7.88 ± 1.64

5.18 ± 0.95

5.81 ± 0.82

NW (mm)

20.17 ± 2.71

21.65 ± 2.70

22.19 ± 2.44

19.62 ± 2.55

21.49 ± 2.35

22.90 ± 2.34

18.84 ± 2.40

20.41 ± 2.47


16.89 ± 2.57

19.62 ± 3.10

19.27 ± 3.18

17.23 ± 2.79

17.83 ± 2.51

20.72 ± 3.13

15.95 ± 2.28

18.52 ± 2.67


20.01 ± 2.46

21.12 ± 2.50

21.38 ± 2.57

19.75 ± 2.23

20.81 ± 2.42

21.94 ± 2.62

19.21 ± 2.25

20.29 ± 2.08


21.21 ± 5.50

22.91 ± 3.72

22.95 ± 3.73

20.76 ± 3.06

22.03 ± 2.99

23.86 ± 4.17

19.54 ± 2.70

21.97 ± 2.95


0.2921 ± 0.0309

0.3090 ± 0.0335

0.2963 ± 0.0299

0.3048 ± 0.0360

0.2901 ± 0.0294

0.3025 ± 0.0294

0.2940 ± 0.0326

0.3156 ± 0.0363


0.2517 ± 0.0747

0.2804 ± 0.0408

0.2581 ± 0.0391

0.2682 ± 0.0435

0.2418 ± 0.0316

0.2744 ± 0.0393

0.2501 ± 0.0375

0.2864 ± 0.0418


0.2976 ± 0.0746

0.3022 ± 0.0340

0.2865 ± 0.0313

0.3070 ± 0.0318

0.2824 ± 0.0302

0.2906 ± 0.0321

0.3005 ± 0.0305

0.3138 ± 0.0321


0.3288 ± 0.0291

0.3275 ± 0.0477

0.3072 ± 0.0443

0.3226 ± 0.0441

0.2988 ± 0.0371

0.3156 ± 0.0494

0.3058 ± 0.0385

0.3393 ± 0.0433

aThe time of participation in physical and sports activities

The correlations between the 2D parameters (the NWs and NWIs at the four different sites) and the 3D femoral notch volume are displayed in Table 3, which includes the overall data analysis and the subgroup analyses. For all participants, the intercondylar notch volumes were moderately correlated with the NWs at the sites of the popliteal groove, notch inlet and ACL attachment, and minimally correlated with the NW at the notch outlet. In the subgroup analyses, the notch volume was irrelevant to the NWs at all of the four sites with the exception of the male ACL-intact group. The intercondylar notch volume was not related to the NWI at any of the four locations in the overall or subgroup analyses.
Table 3

The bivariate Pearson correlation coefficient between the notch volume and 2D notch parameters in overall and subgroup analysis


Notch Volume


Male injured group

Male control group

Female injured group

Female control group











− 0.089






































aSignificant correlation at 0.05 level

bSignificant correlation at 0.01 level

The associations of the 3D femoral notch volume and the 2D parameters (the NWs and NWIs at the four different sites) with the risk of ACL injury are displayed in Table 4. In both the male and female groups, the notch volume, NW, NW_in, and NW_aa were effective parameters for predicting the risk of a non-contact ACL injury (OR = 0.679, 0.844, 0.720 and 0.871, respectively). The NW_ou and NWI were effective parameters for ACL injury prediction only in the female group (OR = 0.765 and 0.836, respectively). The NWI_in, NWI_aa, and NWI_ou were ineffective for predicting ACL injury in the male and female groups.
Table 4

Multivariate Logistic Regression for Analysis of the Notch volume, 2D notch parameters, and demographic dataa in ACL injuries

Overall Data

Male Group

Female Group












Notch Volumeb




< 0.001



< 0.001



< 0.001


1 mm











1 mm



< 0.001



< 0.001



< 0.001


1 mm











1 mm






















































aThe demographic data included the age, body height and weight; the results showed that the age and the body weight were not the risk factors of ACL injuries, the body height was the risk factor of ACL injuries for males, but not for females

bThe notch volume here was the mean value of the eight times multivariate logistic regression analysis

OR: Multivariate odd ratio for ACL injuries in unit change

The mean inter-observer homogeneity (i.e., the mean Cronbach’s α value for all of the 2D parameters and the notch volumes) was 0.948.


One of the most important findings of our research is that the 3D femoral notch volume was almost irrelevant to the conventional 2D notch parameters, including the NW and NWI, at most of the four locations of the femoral notch in the subgroup analysis, which was in line with our hypothesis.

Although the notch volume and the NW were moderately correlated in the overall analysis, they were not correlated with each other in the subgroup analysis, with the exception of the male ACL-intact group. Therefore, the moderate correlation was probably caused by a confounding bias. Nevertheless, our results do not support the findings of van Eck et al. [9]. In their study, CT was applied for femoral notch volume measurement, and arthroscopy was used for the NW measurement, which resulted in a moderate correlation between the notch volume and the NW (including the notch inlet, the middle and the outlet). This was very important clinical research, although it was a study with a small sample study that included only 20 specimens who were not differentiated by gender, and older individuals with knee osteophytosis might not have been be ruled out. Additionally, the notch volumes were measured by CT, which neglected the notch cartilage, and the NWs were measured by arthroscopy, which was not sufficiently accurate due to location deviation. All of these factors blurred the evidence. The reason for the weak correlation between the NW and notch volume may be that the two parameters reflected different characteristics of the femoral notch. Although both parameters can reveal the notch size, the NW only represents the width of a specific location, whereas the notch volume demonstrates the overall size of the space.

Due to the convenience of measurement, 2D femoral notch parameters are the most widely used parameters. However, they only represent the size at one location of the notch and cannot adequately reflect the overall dimension [9], therefore, the measurement results may be biased. The 3D notch volume has advantages to describe the dimension of the femoral notch through 3D measurement. However, due to the higher technical threshold and the more tedious measurement, the application is limited.

We observed a severe lack of statistical correlation between the notch volume and the NWI, which is similar to the results reported by van Eck et al. [17]. One reason for the absence of a correlation between the notch volume and the NWI could be that the notch volume was an actual measurement of a 3D spatial dimension, whereas the NWI is the relative notch width as denoted by the ratio of the 2D notch width and the bicondylar width.

The notch volume and the NW at the popliteal groove, notch inlet, and ACL attachment were independent predictors of ACL injuries for both males and females based on the multivariate analyses of the data that were adjusted for age, body height and weight. Our results confirmed some of the results of previous research [8, 1012, 1921]. A decreased femoral notch size, including the notch volume and the notch widths at specific locations, increased the risk of suffering a non-contact ACL injury. The primary mechanisms include the ACL impingement theory and the small ACL hypothesis. The former means that the ACL might easily impinge on the inner wall of the lateral femoral condyle and lead to an ACL injury [24, 22], especially in the case of tibial plateau rotation shear stress from the front of the knee during flexion [4]. The later means that a small femoral notch size connotes a thin and vulnerable ACL, which could rupture in lower-load sports [14, 23].

Additionally, the NW at the femoral notch outlet, and the NWIs at the popliteal groove and femoral notch inlet were independent predictors of non-contact ACL injuries in the female group but not in the male group. Some other researchers have reported similar findings in that some parameters are useful for predicting ACL injuries in females but not in males [24]. The reasons remain unclear. Some scholars have indicated that the femoral notch size in females is smaller [10, 11, 13, 14], and the gender differences of notch anatomy [9] might be the explanation. Additionally, the ACL injury mechanisms seem to differ between males and females in previous studies [24]. Axial tibial compression combined with knee valgus loading and internal tibial rotation caused high tensile strain on the ACL [25], which might cause an ACL rupture at 15–27° of knee flexion according to research based on females [26].

Not all of the 2D femoral notch parameters were related to ACL injuries in our study. The NWIs at the locations of the femoral notch inlet, outlet, and ACL attachment were not effective parameters for predicting ACL injuries in the multivariate analysis. As the NWI is a ratio that reflects the relative stenosis of the femoral notch and has had numeric cut-off values from 0.19–0.27 in different studies [2729], its accuracy might be insufficient. Moreover, we suspected that the relative stenosis of the femoral notch in some specific locations might not indicate ACL impingement. Furthermore, as the actual notch width and bicondylar width do not increase proportionately with body height, the validity of the NWI might be decreased [30]. Hence, the absolute parameters are occasionally more useful.

Notably, the absolute 2D notch parameters were not always effective for predicting ACL injuries [16, 31]. For example, the NW at the notch outlet was ineffective in the male group in our study. This result may be because some individuals have normal notch width values and narrow notch angles [16]. For example, the NW of a rounded base-stenotic notch may be normal, but the notch angle might not be. In other words, notch shapes are varied; a type A notch [28], which is associated with the morphology of high-risk of ACL injuries, could have the same notch width as other types of notches. Moreover, the 2D measurements are sensitive to rotation and angulation, and the accuracy is thus affected, which can be avoided in 3D analyses.


There are some potential limitations in our study. First, although the patient information was blinded, the researchers could specify the groups of the MRI because the status of the ACL was clearly displayed. This might have caused evidence blurring. To avoid this error, the measurements were performed twice by two experienced radiologists, and the high inter-observer homogeneity of the results demonstrated the reliability of our findings. Second, the individuals of the ACL-intact group were not the normal; they included patients suffering from meniscus injuries, synovitis, patellar tendinopathies and patellar dislocations, and these factors might have resulted in evidence bias. Moreover, no researchers have referred to this issue. To achieve more accurate measurements, we excluded the cases with bony defects or hyperostosis, such as osteochondritis dissecans, villonodular synovitis, and noticeable joint degenerative changes. Moreover, all of the MRIs were obtained from the same machine to prevent evidence bias. Third, our research only involved the Han Chinese, which account for more than 90% of the Chinese population. Since the anatomical differences of the human species exist objectively [32, 33], whether these results are established in all human beings needs further verification. Due to the lack of large-scale epidemiological data of ACL injury on the Chinese population, our research is a supplement to Chinese data.


The current study demonstrated that there were very poor correlations between the characteristic 2D femoral notch parameters (including the NW and NWI) and the 3D notch volume. Therefore, the 2D notch parameters are not recommended as substitutes for the 3D measurements. The NWs at the popliteal groove, femoral notch inlet, outlet, and ACL attachment, and the NWIs at the popliteal groove and the notch volume were useful predictors of ACL injuries. For better femoral notch assessments, both 2D and 3D notch parameters are necessary.








Anterior cruciate ligament


Magnetic resonance imaging


Notch width


The Notch width at the ACL attachment


The Notch width at the notch inlet


The Notch width at the notch outlet


Notch width index



The authors would like to thank Dr. Xiao’er Wei from radiology department, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China for technical guidance; and we also thank Ms. Yujun Xu from Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich for statistical guidance.


1. The Western Medicine Guidance Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality of China (Grant No. 17411966400).

2. The Project of Shenkang Hospital Development Center of Shanghai (Grant No. 16CR3108B).

3. The project of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences (Grant No. DY2018010).

All of this funding was not involved in data collection, data analysis, or the preparation of or editing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Data associated with the present study is retained at the repository at the Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital. If there are any questions, please contact the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

CZ and GX Design of the study, collection of the data, drafting of the manuscript; XZ and ZF analysis and interpretation of the data; FW, FY and JZ Surgical operations, revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital (Approval No: 2016–111) for the MRIs used for this study, and written consent was also obtained from the patients in the present study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 201306, People’s Republic of China
Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China
Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 201306, People’s Republic of China


  1. Souryal TO, Freeman TR. Intercondylar notch size and anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(4):535–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Petersen W, Tillmann B. Structure and vascularization of the cruciate ligaments of the human knee joint. Anat Embryol. 1999;200(3):325–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB, Liudahl KJ, Addlestone RB. Analysis of the intercondylar notch by computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15(6):547–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Olsen OE, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball: a systematic video analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(4):1002–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Staeubli HU, Adam O, Becker W, Burgkart R. Anterior cruciate ligament and intercondylar notch in the coronal oblique plane: anatomy complemented by magnetic resonance imaging in cruciate ligament-intact knees. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(4):349–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Shelbourne KD, Facibene WA, Hunt JJ. Radiographic and intraoperative intercondylar notch width measurements in men and women with unilateral and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5(4):229–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Muneta T, Takakuda K, Yamamoto H. Intercondylar notch width and its relation to the configuration and cross-sectional area of the anterior cruciate ligament. A cadaveric knee study. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(1):69–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Simon RA, Everhart JS, Nagaraja HN, Chaudhari AM. A case-control study of anterior cruciate ligament volume, tibial plateau slopes and intercondylar notch dimensions in ACL-injured knees. J Biomech. 2010;43(9):1702–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Van Eck CF, Martins CA, Kopf S, Lertwanich P, Fu FH, Tashman S. Correlation between the 2-dimensional notch width and the 3-dimensional notch volume: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(2):207–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Swami VG, Mabee M, Hui C, Jaremko JL. Three-dimensional intercondylar notch volumes in a skeletally immature pediatric population: a magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomic comparison of knees with torn and intact anterior cruciate ligaments. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(12):1954–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wratten CJ, Tetsworth K, Hohmann E. Three-dimensional femoral notch volume in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient versus anterior cruciate ligament-intact patients: a matched case-control study with inter-gender comparison. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(6):1117–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Whitney DC, Sturnick DR, Vacek PM, DeSarno MJ, Gardner-Morse M, Tourville TW, Smith HC, Slauterbeck JR, Johnson RJ, Shultz SJ, et al. Relationship between the risk of suffering a first-time noncontact ACL injury and geometry of the femoral notch and ACL: a prospective cohort study with a nested case-control analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1796–805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. van Eck CF, Kopf S, van Dijk CN, Fu FH, Tashman S. Comparison of 3-dimensional notch volume between subjects with and subjects without anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(9):1235–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Charlton WP, St John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M. Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):329–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang C, Xie G, Fang Z, Zhang X, Huangfu X, Zhao J. Assessment of relationship between three dimensional femoral notch volume and anterior cruciate ligament injury in Chinese Han adults: a retrospective MRI study. Int Orthop. 2018. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 30069592.
  16. Alentorn-Geli E, Pelfort X, Mingo F, Lizano-Diez X, Leal-Blanquet J, Torres-Claramunt R, Hinarejos P, Puig-Verdie L, Monllau JC. An evaluation of the association between radiographic intercondylar notch narrowing and anterior cruciate ligament injury in men: the notch angle is a better parameter than notch width. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(10):2004–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. van Eck CF, Martins CA, Lorenz SG, Fu FH, Smolinski P. Assessment of correlation between knee notch width index and the three-dimensional notch volume. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(9):1239–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chaudhari AM, Zelman EA, Flanigan DC, Kaeding CC, Nagaraja HN. Anterior cruciate ligament-injured subjects have smaller anterior cruciate ligaments than matched controls: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(7):1282–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ireland ML, Ballantyne BT, Little K, McClay IS. A radiographic analysis of the relationship between the size and shape of the intercondylar notch and anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(4):200–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Stijak L, Bumbasirevic M, Kadija M, Stankovic G, Herzog R, Filipovic B. Morphometric parameters as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injuries - a MRI case-control study. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014;71(3):271–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernigou P, Garabedian JM. Intercondylar notch width and the risk for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the osteoarthritic knee: evaluation by plain radiography and CT scan. Knee. 2002;9(4):313–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Thein R, Spitzer E, Doyle J, Khamaisy S, Nawabi DH, Chawla H, Lipman JD, Pearle AD. The ACL graft has different cross-sectional dimensions compared with the native ACL: implications for graft impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(8):2097–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chandrashekar N, Slauterbeck J, Hashemi J. Sex-based differences in the anthropometric characteristics of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relation to intercondylar notch geometry: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(10):1492–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sturnick DR, Vacek PM, DeSarno MJ, Gardner-Morse MG, Tourville TW, Slauterbeck JR, Johnson RJ, Shultz SJ, Beynnon BD. Combined anatomic factors predicting risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury for males and females. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):839–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Li G, DeFrate LE, Park SE, Gill TJ, Rubash HE. In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(1):102–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Krosshaug T, Nakamae A, Boden BP, Engebretsen L, Smith G, Slauterbeck JR, Hewett TE, Bahr R. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury in basketball: video analysis of 39 cases. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):359–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoteya K, Kato Y, Motojima S, Ingham SJ, Horaguchi T, Saito A, Tokuhashi Y. Association between intercondylar notch narrowing and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(3):371–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Al-Saeed O, Brown M, Athyal R, Sheikh M. Association of femoral intercondylar notch morphology, width index and the risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(3):678–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Geng B, Wang J, Ma JL, Zhang B, Jiang J, Tan XY, Xia YY. Narrow intercondylar notch and anterior cruciate ligament injury in female nonathletes with knee osteoarthritis aged 41-65 years in plateau region. Chin Med J. 2016;129(21):2540–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Shelbourne KD, Kerr B. The relationship of femoral intercondylar notch width to height, weight, and sex in patients with intact anterior cruciate ligaments. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14(2):92–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lombardo S, Sethi PM, Starkey C. Intercondylar notch stenosis is not a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament tears in professional male basketball players: an 11-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(1):29–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, Tang T, Rubash HE, Li G. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(1):124–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Harvey WF, Niu J, Zhang Y, McCree PI, Felson DT, Nevitt M, Xu L, Aliabadi P, Hunter DJ. Knee alignment differences between Chinese and Caucasian subjects without osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(11):1524–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2019